Upload
lytruc
View
213
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Farrah Siddiqui, M.D.
Discussion: Francis B. Quinn, Jr., M.D., FACS
The University of Texas Medical Branch
Department of Otolaryngology
Grand Rounds Presentation
March 31, 2010
رب زدن عـلما Overview
Background: History of management of PNI
Anatomy & classification of neck zones
Epidemiology
Morbidity & types of injury
Diagnosis
Management
Clinical cases
Conclusions
Background: History 1944: Bailey—early exploration if deep to platysma
1956: Fogelman & Stewart—6% mortality in early exploration vs. 35% if delayed
1979: Roon & Christensen—immediate exploration for middle zone vs. angiogram for stable high or low zones 81% surgery with 53% negative exploration rate
1980s +: Selective management
Clinical Exam
Adjunctive tests: Endoscopy, swallow study
Arteriography
Duplex Ultrasound
Computerized tomography angiography (CTA)
With mandatory exploration, mortality decreased from 15-18% pre WWII to 3-7% during WWII. However, negative exploration increased dramatically—40-60% Roon AJ, Christensen N. Evaluation and treatment of penetrating cervical injuries. J Trauma 1979; 19: 391-7.
Background: History Meyer et al 1987: prospective zone II study, n = 120
5.8% immediate exploration
94.2% had endoscopy & arteriography before surgery
6% morbidity, 0.8% mortality
Biffl WL et al 1997: 18 year prospective study showed selective management of PNI safe
1973-1978: mandatory exploration 56% negative
1978-1996: selective 66% observed
1 missed esophageal injury
16% negative exploration
3 % mortality; 10% morbidity
Biffl WL et al. Selective management of penetrating neck trauma based on cervical level of injury; Denver since 1978
Sniper injury to neck from Spanish Civil War left him with vocal cord paralysis
Anatomy: Zones I - III Zone I: sternal notch
cricothyroid membrane
Zone II: cricothyroid membrane angle of mandible
Zone III: angle of mandible skull base
Is this classification outdated?
Zone I is treated like thoracic injury Anterior neck area classification ant to pos B of SCM; posterior neck not further divided Often patients have multiple wounds or GSW tract can involve multiple zones, so some question importance of this classification Superficial wound does not correspond well to deeper structures injured.
Anatomy: Facial planes
Hematomas, air tracks
Bullet, metal tracks
Carotid space: Carotid, IJV, CN X
Retropharyngeal space: behind pharynx, anterior to prevertebral muscles
Perivertebral space: muscles & soft tissue around vertebrae
www.medscape.com
• Bleeding that displaces prevertebral muscles anteriorly is associated with vertebral body fractures.
• Retropharyngeal carotid artery important for presurgical planning
• Esophageal injury can track air into RP, prevertebral space
• Missed esophageal injuries can present as retropharyngeal abscess, mediastinitis, sepsis
Epidemiology: Adult PNI
1% of all trauma patients in USA
Demetriades et al 1993 GSW more clinical signs & injuries (35% vs. 19% for SW)
Structures injured: 40% no significant damage
Major vein 15-25%
Major artery 10-15%
Digestive tract (pharynx, esophagus) 5-15%
Respiratory tract (larynx, trachea) 4-12%
Major nerves 3-8%
Gun shot (GSW) Stab (SW) Shotgun
45% 40% 4%
• Brywczynski JJ et al. Management of penetrating neck injury in the emergency department: a structured literature review. Emerg Med J 2008; 25: 711-715 metaanalysis of 20 studies
• Demetriades prospective study; 97 GSW, 89 SW
Epidemiology: Pediatric PNI 40% mortality—zones I & III more common
60% zone I—multiple wounds
29% zone II
56% zone III—multiple wounds
Mandatory Neck Exploration Selective Neck Exploration
Hoarseness, aphonia, airway Change in neck exam
Shock, continued bleeding Abnormal diagnostic tests
Blood in aerodigestive tract
Subcutaneous air
Neurologic deficits 86% positive exploration
Multiple major injuries
100% positive exploration
Kim MK et al. Penetrating neck trauma in children: An urban hospital’s experience. Otolayngol Head Neck Surg 2000; 123: 439-43. Upenn n = 35 1990-97 Firearm injuries second leading cause of mortality in age 15-24.
Morbidity: Vascular injury Major Signs
Active bleeding
Unstable/hypotension
Expanding hematoma
Pulsatile swelling
Bruit, thrill
Unilateral CNS deficit
Pulse deficit Minor Signs
Parasthesias
Nonexpanding hematoma
C spine or skull base fractures in MVAs
Morbidity: Vascular injury Carotid artery injury
22% vascular injuries
10-20% mortality in hospital
Repair preferred unless comatose patient
Ligate or embolize if high carotid injury
Minor injury (intimal flap) endovascular repair, ? Anti-platelet Tx
Anticoagulate blunt injury
Vertebral artery injury
10%
2/3 major neck trauma, especially C spine & esophagus
Isolated 1/3 no signs
Sepsis due to missed esophageal injury
Endovascular embolization if bleeding
Ligation low risk
Anticoagulate blunt injury
Morbidity: Esophageal Injury Odynophagia, dysphagia,
hematemesis
Airway injury 25% have esophageal injury
Transcervical trajectory
Saliva in wound, subcutaneous emphysema
Prevertebral air on lateral neck X ray
Kietdumrongwong P & Hemachudha T 2005
Kietdumrongwong P & Hemachudha T. Pneumomediastinum as initial presentation of paralytic rabies: A case reportBMC Infectious Diseases 2005, 5:92.
Morbidity: Esophageal Injury Most commonly missed
Weigelt JA et al 1987: 30% no signs or symptoms
Wood J et al 1989: most common cause delayed morbidity
Asensio JA et al 2001: 34 center study of 405 patients with penetrating esophageal injuries
56% cervical esophagus
19% mortality—most common exsanguination
82% primary repair with 16% requiring muscle flaps
11% drainage
3-4% complex: resection/diversion or resection/anastomosis
41% esophageal complication in delayed repair (vs. 19%)
Empyema, abscess, mediastinitis
Weigelt JA et al. Diagnosis of penetrating cervical esophageal injuries. Am J Surg, 1987; 154 (6): 619-22. Asensio JA et al. Penetrating esophageal injuries: multicenter study of the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma. J Trauma-Injury, Infection & Critical Care. 2001; 50(2): 289-96. 34 centers retrospective Wood J et al. Penetrating neck injuries: recommendations for selective management. J Trauma 1989; 29: 602-5.
Morbidity: Esophageal Injury Srinivasan et al 2000: flexible esophagoscopy safe &
accurate Sensitivity = 92.4%, specificity = 100%
PPV = 33.3%, NPV = 100% no injuries missed
Low PPV because incidence of injury low (3.6%)
Imaging Water soluble contrast (gastrograffin): ½ missed
aspiration pneumonitis: not use if poor gag reflex/cough
Barium: ¼ missed
increased mediastinitis
Srinivasan R et al. Role of Flexible Endoscopy in the Evaluation of Possible Esophageal Trauma After Penetrating Injuries. AJG 2000; 95(2): 1725-29. Start with gastrograffin if negative, repeat swallow with barium
Morbidity: Esophagram
Nel L et al 2009
Nel L et al. Imaging the oesophagus after penetrating cervical trauma using water-soluble contrast alone: simple, cost-effective and accurate. Emerg Med J. 2009;26:106–108
Morbidity: Esophageal Injury Treatment
Observe 24 hrs if high suspicion but studies negative
Pharyngeal injury NPO, IV antibiotics, NGT
Esophageal injury primary repair vs. drainage/ resection/diversion
Early diagnosis primary repair
Late diagnosis with sepsis/inflammation drainage
Morbidity: Airway Injury More common in blunt trauma
5-15% PNI will have laryngotracheal trauma
Hoarseness, stridor, hemoptysis, difficulty breathing, pain
Air leak in wound, difficult airway surgery!!!
Majority airways managed by rapid sequence intubation (RSI) at scene or ED
Mandavia DP 2000 Retrospective N = 748 11% emergent intubation -67% RSI with 100% success -33% fiberoptic 91% success -3 fiberoptic failures RSI
Eggen JT 1993
N = 114 60% intubated, 22% ED No intubation complications
Shearer VE 1993
N = 107 83% RSI with DL 100% success 6% surgical airway 100% 7% awake fiberoptic 98% 4% blind nasotracheal 75%
•Eggen JT et al. Airway management, penetrating neck trauma. J Emerg Med 1993: 11: 31-5. •Mandavia DP et al. Emergency airway management in penetrating neck injury. Ann Emerg Med 2000; 35: 221-5. •Shearer VE et al. Airway management for patients with penetrating neck trauma: a retrospective study. Anasth Analg 1993; 77: 1135-8. •Mandavia et al •Shearer et al
Morbidity: Airway Injury High index of suspicion—avoid paralytic agent!
Trachea most commonly involved (2/3) vs. larynx (1/3)
25% have esophageal injury
Esophageal injury chances of airway injury double
Unstable airway Be prepared for surgical airway
tracheotomy safest option
Stable airway Flexible laryngoscopy, bronchoscopy
CT shows fractures, tracheal injury
OR for endoscopy if suspect injury Steroids, oxygen, IV Abx, humidified air if no fractures, mucosal
disruptions or progressive edema/hematoma
Morbidity: Airway Injury Laryngeal fractures in PNI
Thyroid cartilage most common
Should not delay fixation for > 24 hours since increased risk of scarring
Group Laryngeal Injury Treatment
I Minor endolaryngeal hematoma; No fracture; Good airway
Observe; steroids, PPI, humidity
II Hematoma/edema compromising airway; Laceration without exposed cartilage; Nondisplaced fracture(s)
OR for tracheotomy, DL & esophagoscopy
III Massive edema, exposed cartilage, immobile vocal cord(s), displaced fracture(s)
OR for repair & tracheotomy
IV Group III + more than 2 fracture lines OR for repair & trach
V Laryngotracheal separation OR for repair
Gold SM et al. Blunt laryngeal trauma in children. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1997; 123: 83.
Morbidity: Airway Injury Groups III- V: OR for repair
Repair anterior commissure, TVC lacerations
Cover exposed cartilage
Repair fractures with stainless steel wire or suture
Some prefer absorbable (PDS), others prolene
Nonabsorbable & absorbable miniplates also used
Stent indicated if unstable larynx after fracture fixation or lacerations involving anterior commissure
Remove 10-14 days with endoscopy, remove granulation with CO2 laser
Morbidity: Airway Injury Baisakhiya N et al 2009
Baisakhiya N et al. Laryngotracheal Trauma . The Internet Journal of Otorhinolaryngology. 2009 Volume 9 Number 1 CT shows right thyroid cartilage fracture & air escape suggesting tracheal tear. Extensive subQ air. Patient managed with tracheostomy, reduction of fracture + fixation with 4-0 prolene. Tracheal partially excised with primary repair of trachea.
Morbidity: Airway Injury
Outcomes of penetrating laryngotracheal injury
1/3 delayed diagnosis
10% preventable mortality
Many suffer permanent voice & swallowing problems
Diagnosis: Clinical exam Rivers et al 1988
no vascular injury missed by physical exam
Demetriades et al 1993, n = 335 269 negative exam observed
2 later required intervention for vascular injury
Demetriades et al 1996, n = 223 All patients with negative clinical exam
had arteriogram
No vascular injury requiring intervention
NPV of clinical exam 100%
Biffl et al 1997, n = 312 105 positive exam OR
16% negative exploration
207 negative exam observed
1 esophageal perforation
Sekharan J et al 2000, n = 145 0.7% vascular injury missed
Azuaje R et al 2003 93% sensitive, 97% PPV
Inaba K et al 2006, n = 91 100% sensitive, 93.5% specific
Tisherman SA et al 2008 Clinical exam protocol up to 95% sensitive
injury Demetriades Br J Surg 1993; World J Surg 1996, all prospective Biff et al, Am J Surg 1997, prospective Tisherman SA et al. Clinical practice guideline; penetrating zone II neck trauma. J Trauma 64: 1392-1405, 2008. Inaba K et al. Prospective evaluation of screening multislice helical computed tomographic angiography in the evaluation of penetrating neck trauma. J Trauma 61: 144-149, 2006. n = 91, prospective Azuaje RE et al. Reliability of physical examination as a predictor of vascular injury after penetrating neck trauma. The Am Surg. 2003; 69: 804-7. Sekharan J et al. Continued experience with physical examination alone for evaluation and management of penetrating zone 2 neck injuries: rests of 145 cases. J Vasc Surg 1988; 8: 112-6.
Diagnosis: Clinical Exam Fogelman MJ & Stewart RD 1956: 43% positive explorations were
hemodynamically stable & 70% had no bleeding
Carducci et al 1985: 1/3 patients with positive exploration had no
signs/symptoms on clinical exam
Scalafani et al 1991: 61% sensitivity for vascular injury
Apffelstaedt et al 1994: n = 335 SW; 30% positive explorations had no clinical signs
Eddy VA et al 2000: low sensitivity & NPV with clinical exam but improved in patients when CXR added to physical exam
Fogelman MJ and Stewart RD, Am J Surg 1956, 91: 581. Carducci et al, Ann Emerg Med 1985 15:208 Apffelstaedt World J Surg, 1994, 18: 917 Scalafani SJ et al. The role of angiography in penetrating neck trauma. J Trauma 31: 557-62, 1991. Eddy VA et al. Is routine arteriography mandatory for penetrating injuries to zone I of the neck? J Trauma 2000; 48: 208.
Diagnosis: Arteriography Gold standard for vascular injury
Diagnostic & therapeutic
Zones I & III difficult to assess clinically
Zones I & III often involve complex surgery
Eddy VA et al 2000
N = 138, retrospective review vs. mandatory zone I angio
No arterial injuries on arteriogram if normal exam & CXR
Demetriades et al 1993
Cost-effective for zones I & III
Decreased surgery rates to 5% in zone I & 13% in zone III
Diagnosis: Arteriography Modrall JM et al 1995 meta-analysis: Diagnosis of vascular
trauma
23% positive zones I & III
2.2 to 28% positive zone II only 1% needs surgery
94-100% sensitive
90-98% specific
54-66% PPV high false positive rate
100% NPV no false negatives
0-3% complication, mostly minor
$66,420 per positive arteriogram due to high FP
Modrall JM et al. Diagnosis of vascular trauma. 9(4) 1995.
Diagnosis: Arteriography—arterial injury
Munera F et al 2000
Left carotid artery occlusion seenin angiogram on right as well as parasagittal helical CTA on left
Diagnosis: Arteriography Specialized team
Expensive
0.16-2.0% complication: hematoma, pseudoaneurysm, spasm, thrombosis, emboli, thrombi, arterial dissection
permanent CNS sequelae
Morris C 2008.
Morris C. Vascular and Solid Organ Trauma - Interventional Radiology. www.emedicine.com 2008. Digital subtraction left cervical carotid angiogram demonstrating traumatic injury of the left internal carotid artery, manifested by pseudoaneurysm formation and an intimal dissection
Diagnosis: Arteriography
Endovascular therapy Covered stent graft:
pseudoaneurysm, lacerations, AVF
Embolization or coiling: pseudoaneurysm, AVF
Endovascular occlusion: injured vertebral arteries
Test balloon occlusion prior to ligation
www.medscape.com
Munera F et al 2000 & 2005.
Diagnosis: Arteriography
www.findmeacure.com
Dong Z et al 2006.
Dong Z et al. Endovascular repair for a huge vertebral artery pseudoaneurysm caused by Behcet’s disease. Chinese Medical Journal, 2006, Vol. 119 No. 5 : 435-437
Diagnosis: Duplex U/S Bynoe RP et al 1991, n = 198
95% sensitive, 99% specific
Demetraides D et al 1995 (82) 91% sensitive, 98.6% specific
100% sensitive for clinically significant injuries
Montalvo BM et al 1996 (52) Detected all serious injuries
Limitations Operator dependent
No soft tissue/bony detail
Not useful in zone I & III
•Bynoe RP et al. Noninvasive diagnosis of vascular trauma by duplex ultrasonagraphy. J VAsc Surg 14: 346-52, 1991. prospective •Demetraides D et al. Penetrating injuries of the neck in patients in stable condition: Physical examination, angiography or color flow Doppler imaging. Arch Surg 130: 971-75. 1995. prospective •Montalvo BM et al. Collor Doppler sonography in penetrating injuries of the neck. Am J Neuroradiol. 17: 943-951, 1996. prospective •Picture shows Pseudoaneurysm (arrow) of the femoral artery on angiography and on (B) color duplex ultrasound demonstrating communication and flow between the false aneurysm (FA) and the common femoral artery (CFA) via a neck. (C) Characteristic "to-and-fro" Doppler waveform in the neck of the pseudoaneurysm. (D) Absence of flow within the false aneurysm after successful thrombin injection
Diagnosis: CTA Method:
Nonionic contrast in peripheral IV, care in renal or diabetic
Exam takes 1 min., postprocessing takes 15 min.
Axial usually enough; add multiplanar + 3D for OR plan
Direct signs
Irregular vessel margins, filling defects
Contrast extravasation, lack of vascular enhancement
Vessel caliber changes
Indirect: indistinct perivascular fat plane, bullet/bone fragments within 5 mm of major vessel, hematoma close to vessel
Associated Injuries: C spine, bullet track, aerodigestive
Munera F et al. Penetrating injuries of the neck: use of helical computed tomographic angiography. J Trauma. 2005; 58: 413-18. University of Miami, prospective 2 yr. n = 60
Diagnosis: CTA Munera F et al 2000 (2005) (p)
Sensitivity 90% (100%)
Specificity 100% (98.6%)
PPV 100% (92.8%)
NPV 98% (100%)
Inaba K et al 2006 (p)
Sensitivity 100%
Specificity 93.5%
Nondiagnostic 2.2%
Woo K et al 2005 (r)
CTA decreased negative exploration & adjunct tests
Gonzalez RP et al 2003 (p)
Physical exam missed 2 esophageal injuries seen on CTA
Recommend as initial for zone II
Mazolewski PJ et al 2001 (p)
100% sensitive, 91% specific
operative findings in zone II
Gracias VH et al 2001 (r)
Initial test in zones I – III
Decreased overall adjunct studies
MRI/MRA logistics difficult, no bony information
(1st number compared to arteriography; 2nd number compared to actual intervention—surgery or endovascular or observation) Munera F et al. Diagnosis of arterial injuries caused by penetrating trauma to the neck: comparison of helical CT angiography and conventional angiography. Radiology 2000; 216 (2) 356-62. Inaba K et al. Prospective evaluation of screening multislcine helical CTA in the initial evaluation of penetrating neck injuries. J Trauma, Injury, Infection and Critical Care. 2006; 61 (1): 144-56 Gracias VH et al. Computed tomography in the evaluation of penetrating neck trauma: a preliminary study. Arch Surg. 2001; 136: 1231-1235. Mazolewski PJ et al. Computed tomographic scan can be used for surgical decision making in zone II penetrating neck injuries. J Trauma. 2001: 51: 315-19. Gonzalez RP et al. Penetrating zone II neck injury: does dynamic computed tomographic scan contribute to the diagnostic sensitivity of physical examination for surgically significant injury? A prospective blinded study. J Trauma 2003; 54: 61-4.
Diagnosis: CTA Woo K et al 2005 Retrospective 1994 – 2004
Patient n = 130
Surgery Negative
Exploration
Angio-graphy
Esopha-gram
CF
Doppler
CTA 34 1
(3%)
0 4
(12%)
4
(12%)
13
(39%)
No CTA 96 32
(33%)
22%
(66%/32)
19
(29%)
17
(26%)
21
(32%)
No CTA 1994-1998: 34% angiogram, 24% esophagram
41% CTA 1999-2004: 11% angiogram, 16% esophagram
Woo Karen et al. CT angiography in penetrating neck trauma reduced the need for operative neck exploration. The American Surgeon 2005.
Diagnosis: Cost-effectiveness of CTA
Seamon MJ et al: extremity CTA versus arteriogram saved $12,922 in patient charges & $1,166 hospital cost
Decreased negative exploration rate cuts OR & patient cost
A Prospective Validation of a Current Practice: The Detection of Extremity Vascular Injury With CT Angiography. Original Article Journal of Trauma-Injury Infection & Critical Care. 67(2):238-244, August 2009. Seamon, Mark J.
Diagnosis: CTA—stab wound
Munera F et al. Multidetector row computed tomography in the management of penetrating neck injuries. Seminals in Ultrasound CT and MRI. 2009. Multiple stab wounds to neck; axial CT (c) shows right skin defect with extension down to jugular vein, no hematoma; B) is maximum intensity projection & A) is color 3D volume rendered image patient taken to OR for debridement & small injury to right IJV repaired
Diagnosis: CTA—arterial injury
Munera F et al 2009.
Self-inflicted GSW to right neck; axial CTA shows large hematoma with contrast extravasation. MIP & 3D show facial artery branching from ECA & running into hematoma,most likely source of bleeding
Diagnosis: CTA—arterial injury
Munera F et al 2005
Right common carotid pseudoaneurysm
Diagnosis: CTA—arterial injury
Munera F et al 2000
Axial CT images from inferior to superior shows progressive narrowing of right ICA; no contrast enhancement seen in superior most (bottom)
Diagnosis: CTA—arterial injury
Munera F et al 2000
Left common carotid pseudoaneurysm with fistula to IJV: left = proximal axial CT, right = at bifurcation; see increased collection of contrast into left IJV as compared to normal right; sagittal recon shows extravasation of contrast and increased enhancement of left IJV
Diagnosis: CTA—venous injury
Munera F et al 2009. Direct injury with thrombosis of right IJV
Diagnosis: CTA—esophageal injury
Munera F et al 2005.
Axial CT shows bullet tract through left neck, close to esophagus; esophagus replaced by large posterior mediastinal hematoma
Diagnosis: CTA—esophageal injury
Rathlev NK et al 2007
Rathlev NK et al. Evaluation and management of neck trauma. Emerg Med Clin N Am 2007; 25: 679-694. Free air adj to esophagus, traumatic perf
Diagnosis: CTA Limitations
1.1 – 2.2% nondiagnostic
Large patients: shoulder obscures neck
Streak artifacts from bullets/metal
Normal variants may look like injuries
Subclavian arteries
Large volume contrast: renal, diabetic patient
Munera F et al 2009.
Munera F et al 2009. GSW to neck, bullet fragments in right carotid space cause streak artifact nondiagnostic CTA required angio which showed dissection
Management Summary Unstable Stable w/ symptoms Stable without
symptoms
Airway injury
Hemodynamic instability
Uncontrolled bleeding
Evolving CVA
Hematoma, hemoptysis, hematemesis, dysphagia, dysphonia, peripheral neuro deficit, subcutaneous air
Mandatory Exploration CTA in all
Selective testing: endoscopy, esophagraphy
Arteriography I & III
Foley tamponade
? Mandatory exploration
Observe > 12 hrs
CTA in all
Arteriography & Esophagraphy in zone I
? exploration
South Africa: Foley catheter balloon tamponade for life-threatening hemorrhage in penetrating neck trauma. Navsaria P et al. World J Surgy 2006 30: 1265-1268
Case 1 24 M, GSW to right neck
Intubated at scene
Vitals currently stable
Right neck swelling, no bruit/thrill
SubQ air
CTA done
What next?
Woo K et al 2005
Woo K et al 2005. CTA allows visualization of bullet tract; carotids are fine; bullet fragments + air in prevertebral + parapharyngeal space esophagram done, no injury noted
Case 2 35 M
Injury to neck with working with axe
chip flew into midline
1 week ago
c/o pain, dysphagia
Vitals stable, no dysphonia
No fever
Wound between thyroid & cricoid, no saliva or air
Gulia J et al 2009
•J. Gulia, S. Yadav, K. Singh & A. Khaowas : Penetrating Neck Injury: Report Of Two Cases. The Internet Journal of Emergency Medicine. 2009 Volume 6 Number 1 •Gulia J et al 2009
Case 3: 40 M, stray shot to neck
c/o pain, some bleeding
Wound anterior neck
No exit wound
No swelling
Mild dysphonia
No airway distress
Vitals stable Sari M et al 2007.
Sari M et al 2007. Atypical penetrating laryngeal trauma. European Journal of Emergency Medicine 2007, 14:230–232
Case 3 Sari M et al 2007.
Flexible laryngoscopy showed airway stable, bilat TVC mobile, right supraglottic edema with bullet lodged OR for DL, bullet removed, no further intervention needed, observed x 24 hrs.
Conclusions Immediate exploration for patients with hard signs
Hemodynamic instability
Uncontrollable bleeding, expanding hematoma
Worsening neurological status
Air bubbling in wound, need for surgical airway
Brywczynski JJ et al 2008: meta-analysis shows C spine injury less common in penetrating trauma
Remove C collar to examine neck !!!
Selective management of stable patients
Conclusions: Selective Management Method Logistics
($, ease)
Reliability Adjunct Tests
Bonus
Physical Exam Cheap
Quick
Large trauma centers
X rays
Esophagram
Endoscopy
No
Duplex Ultrasound
Cheap
Quick
Operator
Zone II only
No
Arteriography Expensive
Time
Specialized
Gold standard vascular injury
Endovascular Treatment
CTA Mid price
Quick
Good
Streak artifacts
Lower rate Bony, tissue, aerodigestiveC spine, bullet tract
Conclusions Zone I Zone II Zone III
CTA CTA CTA
Esophagram/flexible esophagoscopy if suspect/see injury on CT
Flexible laryngoscopy if suspect/see injury on CT
Arteriogram if CTA nondiagnostic, need more information for OR or plan endovascular intervention
OR if injury needs to be surgically assessed/repaired
? Usefulness of whole body CTA in multiple GSW/SW
Neck Zones Obsolete???
Conclusions
Zone I-III classification still works for operative management of vascular injuries
Zone II easy to get proximal & distal control surgery
Zone I & III may try endovascular therapy
Difficult proximal control zone I: median sternotomy
Difficult distal control zone III: skull base
Penetrating neck injury: Algorithm
Munera F et al.
Munera F et al. Penetrating injuries of the neck: use of helical computed tomographic angiography. J Trauma. 2005; 58: 413-18. University of Miami, prospective 2 yr. n = 60
Discussion: Francis B. Quinn, Jr., MD Doctor Siddiqui has given an excellent and up‐to‐date summary of the diagnosis and treatment of
penetrating injuries of the neck, with emphasis on the wide range of approaches made possible by
newer imaging techniques. She has pointed out that the earlier "zone" protocol may be soon
overwhelmed by the more modern "selective" management strategies.
The question of evaluating various series of cases is made complicated by the several mechanisms
of injury as drawn from different cultures and environments. We note that 75% of South African
patients present with incised wounds, 50% of U.S. urban patients seek treatment for gunshot
wounds, and our military casualties suffer wounds from low‐velocity shell fragments, as well as high
velocity small caliber rifle bullets, often accompanied by substantial loss of tissue.
Thus, reports of treatment results should allow us to picture the biomechanics of injury, for as has
been shown in a previous Grand Rounds(1,2,3), the high velocity projectile creates instantaneous and
extensive tissue expansion with shearing stress leading to delayed devitalizationand unanticipated
late complications. Further, even low velocity (800 fps) bullets are known to tumble and fragment,
causing tissue injury far from the missile track. In contrast, stabbing or cutting injury causes tissue
injury limited to the track of the weapon.
Doctor Siddiqui's presentation has shown us that the newer treatment methods have laid upon
faculty of resident training institutions the requirement to distill the reports of these methods into a
doctrine suitable for the instruction of those aspiring young surgeons under our direction, a doctrine
which takes into account the local weapons culture as well as the technical and imaging support
available.