64
Fall Protection for Towers 1. Review of CPL 2-1.36 Fall Protection for Towers

Fall Protection for Towers 1. Review of CPL 2-1.36 Fall Protection for Towers

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Fall Protection for Towers 1. Review of CPL 2-1.36 Fall Protection for Towers

Fall Protection for Towers

1. Review of CPL 2-1.36

Fall Protection for Towers

Page 2: Fall Protection for Towers 1. Review of CPL 2-1.36 Fall Protection for Towers

Disclaimer

“This material was produced under Grant No. 46F3-HT13 from the Occupational Safety & Health Administration, U.S. Department of Labor. It does not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the U.S. Department of Labor, nor does mention of trade names, commercial products or organizations imply endorsement by the U.S. government.”

Page 3: Fall Protection for Towers 1. Review of CPL 2-1.36 Fall Protection for Towers
Page 4: Fall Protection for Towers 1. Review of CPL 2-1.36 Fall Protection for Towers
Page 5: Fall Protection for Towers 1. Review of CPL 2-1.36 Fall Protection for Towers

Competent Person Is capable of identifying existing and

predictable hazards in surroundings or in working conditions which are unsanitary, hazardous or dangerous to employees

Has authorization to take prompt corrective measures

Page 6: Fall Protection for Towers 1. Review of CPL 2-1.36 Fall Protection for Towers

Qualified Person Has recognized degree, certificate or

professional standing, or has extensive knowledge, training and experience

Has successfully demonstrated ability to solve or resolve problems related to subject matter, the work or project

Page 7: Fall Protection for Towers 1. Review of CPL 2-1.36 Fall Protection for Towers

Crew Chief Is authorized, designated and

deemed competent and qualified by the employer

Page 8: Fall Protection for Towers 1. Review of CPL 2-1.36 Fall Protection for Towers

Authorized Person Is approved or assigned by the

employer to perform a specific duty type(s) or to be at a specific location(s) at the job site

Page 9: Fall Protection for Towers 1. Review of CPL 2-1.36 Fall Protection for Towers

Equipment Anti- two-blocking device:

Used on all hoists except when an employer can demonstrate that ambient radiation frequency (RF) precludes such use

Page 10: Fall Protection for Towers 1. Review of CPL 2-1.36 Fall Protection for Towers

Equipment … In such case, a site-specific safety

and health program will be established and maintained onsite to ensure that: Two-blocking cannot occur Effective communications between the

hoist operator and personnel being hoisted is maintained

Page 11: Fall Protection for Towers 1. Review of CPL 2-1.36 Fall Protection for Towers
Page 12: Fall Protection for Towers 1. Review of CPL 2-1.36 Fall Protection for Towers

Equipment

Anti-two-blocking tower mount transmitter

Page 13: Fall Protection for Towers 1. Review of CPL 2-1.36 Fall Protection for Towers

Riding the Line No more than two employees may

be hoisted on load line at one time (effective 3/26/02)

Pre-lift meeting reviews procedures and appropriate requirements in this guideline (CPL 2-1.36)

Page 14: Fall Protection for Towers 1. Review of CPL 2-1.36 Fall Protection for Towers

Riding the Line Equipment:

Anti-two-block device used on all hoists Rigging, hoist line and slings shall have

factor of 10/1 Hoist line used to raise or lower

employees equipped with swivel Spin-resistant wire rope prohibited

Page 15: Fall Protection for Towers 1. Review of CPL 2-1.36 Fall Protection for Towers
Page 16: Fall Protection for Towers 1. Review of CPL 2-1.36 Fall Protection for Towers

Riding the Line Equipment:

When hoisting personnel, the hoist capacity load rating de-rated by a factor of 2 (reduced by half)

All employees provided with and required to use proper PPE, which inspected before each use

Page 17: Fall Protection for Towers 1. Review of CPL 2-1.36 Fall Protection for Towers

Riding the Line Equipment:

Guide line used except where employer can demonstrate specific circumstances or conditions to preclude use

Page 18: Fall Protection for Towers 1. Review of CPL 2-1.36 Fall Protection for Towers
Page 19: Fall Protection for Towers 1. Review of CPL 2-1.36 Fall Protection for Towers

Anti-two-block warning system

Page 20: Fall Protection for Towers 1. Review of CPL 2-1.36 Fall Protection for Towers

Riding the Line Equipment:

Gin poles thoroughly inspected by competent person before each use to determine they’re free of defects, including but not limited to:• Damaged and/or missing members• Corrosive damage• Missing fasteners• Broken welds at joints• General deterioration

Page 21: Fall Protection for Towers 1. Review of CPL 2-1.36 Fall Protection for Towers
Page 22: Fall Protection for Towers 1. Review of CPL 2-1.36 Fall Protection for Towers
Page 23: Fall Protection for Towers 1. Review of CPL 2-1.36 Fall Protection for Towers

Riding the Line Equipment:

Gin pole attached to tower as designed by RPE, and minimum of two attachment locations at bottom and near top

Personnel load and material capacities of lifting system in use posted onsite near hoist operator’s location

Page 24: Fall Protection for Towers 1. Review of CPL 2-1.36 Fall Protection for Towers

Riding the Line All trial lifts, inspections and proof

tests documented and documentation left onsite

Except where demonstrated that its use is precluded, a personnel platform must be used to hoist more than one employee to work station (1926.550(g))

Page 25: Fall Protection for Towers 1. Review of CPL 2-1.36 Fall Protection for Towers
Page 26: Fall Protection for Towers 1. Review of CPL 2-1.36 Fall Protection for Towers

Riding the Line When a Bostswain’s seat-type or full

body harness used to hoist employees, the following applies: No more than two employees at a time Harness attached to hook by lanyard Only locking type snaphooks used Harness equipped with two side rings

and at least one front and one back D ring

Page 27: Fall Protection for Towers 1. Review of CPL 2-1.36 Fall Protection for Towers
Page 28: Fall Protection for Towers 1. Review of CPL 2-1.36 Fall Protection for Towers

Riding the Line Hoist line hook equipped with safety

latch which can be locked in a closed position

Use of free-spooling (friction lowering) prohibited

When hoist line used to raise or lower employee(s), no other load shall be attached to any hoist line

Page 29: Fall Protection for Towers 1. Review of CPL 2-1.36 Fall Protection for Towers

Riding the Line No other load shall be raised or

lowered at same time on same hoist

Page 30: Fall Protection for Towers 1. Review of CPL 2-1.36 Fall Protection for Towers

Riding the Line As-built drawings approved by RPE

provides lifting capacity of gin pole and available at job site

Gin pole raising line not to be used to raise or lower employees

Employees must maintain 100% tie off when moving between hoist line and tower

Page 31: Fall Protection for Towers 1. Review of CPL 2-1.36 Fall Protection for Towers
Page 32: Fall Protection for Towers 1. Review of CPL 2-1.36 Fall Protection for Towers

Riding the Line Maximum rate of travel shall not

exceed 200 feet per minute when guide line used to control personnel hoists

When guide line cannot be used, rate of hoisted employee’s travel shall not exceed 100 feet per minute

Page 33: Fall Protection for Towers 1. Review of CPL 2-1.36 Fall Protection for Towers

Riding the Line In all personnel hoist situations,

maximum rate shall not exceed 50 feet per minute when personnel being lifted approach within 50 feet of top block

Page 34: Fall Protection for Towers 1. Review of CPL 2-1.36 Fall Protection for Towers

Speed control and speed indication are required, especially for personnel rated hoists.

Page 35: Fall Protection for Towers 1. Review of CPL 2-1.36 Fall Protection for Towers

Communications During Lifting Operations Employees being hoisted shall

remain in continuous sight of and/or in direct communications with operator or signal person

When radios used, shall be non-trunking, closed 2-way selective frequency systems

Page 36: Fall Protection for Towers 1. Review of CPL 2-1.36 Fall Protection for Towers

Communications During Lifting Operations When hand signals used, employees

must use industry standard hand signals

Page 37: Fall Protection for Towers 1. Review of CPL 2-1.36 Fall Protection for Towers
Page 38: Fall Protection for Towers 1. Review of CPL 2-1.36 Fall Protection for Towers

Pre-Lift Meeting Held prior to trial lift at each location Meeting shall:

Be attended by hoist operator, employees to be lifted and crew chief

Review procedures to be followed and all appropriate requirements

Be repeated for any employee newly assigned

Page 39: Fall Protection for Towers 1. Review of CPL 2-1.36 Fall Protection for Towers

Documentation All trial lifts, inspections and proof

tests documented, with documentation remaining onsite during length of project

Pre-lift meeting documented, with documentation remaining onsite during length of project

Page 40: Fall Protection for Towers 1. Review of CPL 2-1.36 Fall Protection for Towers

Fall Protection

… Fall protection during climbing is necessary part of fall safety. However, climbers sometimes faced with climbing in areas with inadequate anchorage points (typically during antenna climbing). In these cases, first man up carries and attaches safety rope for use during time of work performance. Fall protection rope removed when all work completed.

Page 41: Fall Protection for Towers 1. Review of CPL 2-1.36 Fall Protection for Towers

Fall Prevention

… Though free climbing not authorized, antenna manufacturers do not presently have way to provide fall protection that meets minimum anchorage requirements.

Page 42: Fall Protection for Towers 1. Review of CPL 2-1.36 Fall Protection for Towers

First man up attaches safety line. Once attached, all others can attach to it. Depending upon the number of personnel on the antenna, more than one rope may be required.

Page 43: Fall Protection for Towers 1. Review of CPL 2-1.36 Fall Protection for Towers

The use of portable type anchorage points can make difficult attachment locations safe. Cross arms shown here are one such means.

Page 44: Fall Protection for Towers 1. Review of CPL 2-1.36 Fall Protection for Towers
Page 45: Fall Protection for Towers 1. Review of CPL 2-1.36 Fall Protection for Towers

Climber is attached with fall protection lanyard and positioning device.

Page 46: Fall Protection for Towers 1. Review of CPL 2-1.36 Fall Protection for Towers

Climber is using a cross arm anchorage point to allow him to work in an area that does not have an adequate anchorage point.

Page 47: Fall Protection for Towers 1. Review of CPL 2-1.36 Fall Protection for Towers

Climber is transferring from one anchorage point to another.

Page 48: Fall Protection for Towers 1. Review of CPL 2-1.36 Fall Protection for Towers

Proposed Rule The following NOT in place and NOT

currently a rule: “Qualified climber” is term used in

tower industry and by National Association of Tower Erectors (NATE)

Though term used, still not an accepted principle by OSHA

Page 49: Fall Protection for Towers 1. Review of CPL 2-1.36 Fall Protection for Towers

Excerpt From Proposed Change “Federal Register”

Vol. 55, No. 69 April 10, 1990 1910 Walking and Working Surfaces

and Personal Protective Equipment (Fall Protection Systems)

Page 50: Fall Protection for Towers 1. Review of CPL 2-1.36 Fall Protection for Towers

Proposed Rule (under ladders) Indeed, OSHA believes that the

amount of time employees would spend installing, inspecting and maintaining fall protection on fixed ladders could substantially exceed the amount of time that ‘qualified climbers’ would be spending to climb the ladders.

Page 51: Fall Protection for Towers 1. Review of CPL 2-1.36 Fall Protection for Towers

Proposed Rule Therefore, as an alternative, OSHA

believes it appropriate to allow “qualified climbers” as defined by OSHA to climb these ladders without fall protection under certain conditions.

Page 52: Fall Protection for Towers 1. Review of CPL 2-1.36 Fall Protection for Towers

Proposed Rule First, the employer would have to

certify that the employee is a “qualified climber,” as provided in 1910.32(b)(5) of this proposal.

Second, once the “qualified climber” reaches a work station, the employer would be required to provide appropriate fall protection.

Page 53: Fall Protection for Towers 1. Review of CPL 2-1.36 Fall Protection for Towers

Proposed Rule “Qualified climbers” as provided in

1910.23(a)(2), ladders and step bolts on triangulation, telecommunication electrical power towers and poles and similar structures, including stacks and chimneys, need not have ladder safety devices, cages or wells if only “qualified climbers” are permitted to use these ladders or step bolts. Such “qualified climbers” shall meet the following requirements.

Page 54: Fall Protection for Towers 1. Review of CPL 2-1.36 Fall Protection for Towers

Proposed Rule (i) “Qualified climbers” shall be

physically capable (demonstrated through observations of actual climbing activities or by a physical examination) of performing the duties which may be assigned them.

Page 55: Fall Protection for Towers 1. Review of CPL 2-1.36 Fall Protection for Towers

Proposed Rule (ii) “Qualified climbers” shall have

successfully completed a training or apprenticeship program that covered hands-on training for the safe climbing of ladders or step bolts and shall be retrained as necessary to ensure the necessary skills are maintained.

Page 56: Fall Protection for Towers 1. Review of CPL 2-1.36 Fall Protection for Towers

Proposed Rule (iii) The employer shall ensure

through performance observations, and formal classroom or on the job training, that the “qualified climber” has the skill to safely perform the climbing.

Page 57: Fall Protection for Towers 1. Review of CPL 2-1.36 Fall Protection for Towers

Proposed Rule (iv) “Qualified climbers” shall have

climbing duties as one of their routine work activities and

(v) “Qualified climbers,” when reaching their work position, shall be protected by a fall protection system meeting the requirements of 1910.28.

Page 58: Fall Protection for Towers 1. Review of CPL 2-1.36 Fall Protection for Towers

Proposed Rule 1910.268 Telecommunications (g) Personal climbing equipment – (1)

General body belts and pole straps shall be provided and the employer shall ensure their use when work is performed at positions more than four feet (1.2m) above the ground, on poles and on towers, except as provided in paragraphs (n)(7) and (n)(8) of this section.

Page 59: Fall Protection for Towers 1. Review of CPL 2-1.36 Fall Protection for Towers

Proposed Rule … Personal fall protection systems shall

meet the applicable requirements set forth in Subpart I of this part. The employer shall ensure that all climbing equipment is inspected prior to each day’s use to determine that it is in safe working condition.

Page 60: Fall Protection for Towers 1. Review of CPL 2-1.36 Fall Protection for Towers

Proposed Rule … Production samples of personal

fall protection systems shall be certified by the manufacturer or a qualified person as having been tested in accordance with and as meeting the requirements of Subpart I of this part as applicable.

Page 61: Fall Protection for Towers 1. Review of CPL 2-1.36 Fall Protection for Towers

Remember Currently no program for “qualified

climbers” However, if company set up for a

“qualified climber” program, the proposed rules would be a minimum starting point for establishing safe climber’s program

Page 62: Fall Protection for Towers 1. Review of CPL 2-1.36 Fall Protection for Towers

Remember Absolute best method for

maintaining climber safety is 100% fall protection

Page 63: Fall Protection for Towers 1. Review of CPL 2-1.36 Fall Protection for Towers

Remember Accidents from falls do not have

to be from towers Can happen from any height, so

think about what you are doing

Page 64: Fall Protection for Towers 1. Review of CPL 2-1.36 Fall Protection for Towers

Questions???