1
Poster template by ResearchPosters.co.za AFRIBILITY UNVEILED Navigating disability issues in Africa and beyond Fadia Gamieldien (GMLFAD001) AHS4089F Introduction to Disability as Diversity: Disability Studies Programme, University of Cape Town July 2011) Introduction Process A B Results Discussion References Upholding the human rights of vulnerable groups requires an interdisciplinary way of thinking about disability. This comes with intersectoral collaboration between health practitioners, academics, researchers, civil society, disabled peoples’ organisations and community based human resources. This will facilitate reintegration via community engagement, resource mobilisation, strengthening sense of agency in individuals and groups, public- private partnerships and access to information. An individual can become disabled at any time in their lives and what is functional in one world is not necessarily functional in another. The socio/cultural dynamics which impacts on citizenship for disabled people occurs on a multitude of levels which should consider the notion of justice as it means different things to different people. This framework considers individual self identity, power, psychodynamics, and connection of self with others versus collective identity in terms of physical, economic, social, emotional, political and moral dimensions. Infrastructure changes to improve access must be addressed along with attitudinal barriers. Awareness of power and privilege is important in terms of addressing the imbalances of the past as even within the disability sector there is a hierarchy of privilege which allows some people to access resources easier than others (Barnes, 2007). According to Deal (2007), subtle forms of prejudice impacts on disabled people and there are gender-specific risk factors for mental health problems that disproportionately affect women. In Africa, women have lower social status than men, experience greater discrimination and are often at the receiving end of gender based physical and sexual violence which is exacerbated by limited access to resources. African countries also experiences different crises (war, xenophobia, natural disasters) and the aftermath of these has an impact on the mental health needs of survivors. Models give people an opportunity to shape ideas as well as be shaped by ideas. Different models related to disability have been developed mostly in the West. The reviewer looked at models in the literature and considered the following aspects: Does it speak to health as a human rights issue? Does it consider the African context? Does it allow for issues of diversity? The three dominant models are: 1. The moral/religious model where the cause of impairments is attributed to wrong doing and are seen as a divine or moral justice which is part of a supernatural scheme. 2. The medical/individual model which is impairment focused and difficulties faced by disabled individuals are viewed as their deviation from the ‘norm’ as a result of their functional deficits. 3. The social/political model where disability is framed as a form of oppression as a result of the social experience of having an impairment and not due to the impairment itself (Hammel, 2006:61). It is recognised as the vehicle that has lead to a human rights approach to address the global oppression faced by disabled people. Western models focus on economics as they have been developed in high income countries, while African countries value indigenous knowledge systems and cultures focussing on the sacred reality of life. This creates an opportunity to consider a socio- ecological approach to disabled people and their environment; with consideration to ethics, spirituality and hope in terms of humans’ connection to the universe and its impact on spiritual wellbeing (Kronenberg and Pollard, 2005:321). Historically mental illness has been marginalized within the service delivery sector yet it can be the cause as well as be caused by poverty, violence, inequality and HIV/ AIDS. This model provides a framework for thinking about sustainable reintegration opportunities for disabled people in their environments of choice as these relate to areas of living, learning, working and socializing. The term environment is not restricted to geography but also economic, social, legal, cultural and political structures informing space and place and shaping peoples’ lives (Hammel, 2006:60). It is viewed as a politically relevant model for advocating for the health and wellbeing of disabled people in Africa in terms of intersectionality, positionality and diversity. The challenge now is for Africa to embrace its history and cultural diversity and access a model applicable for the continent. This model looks at factors to consider to ensure that disabled people are able to carry out gender specific, locally relevant, economic activities within the wider cultural-political environment. Understanding each other well, respecting others, and accepting others will create a more suitable habitat for human kind. Afribility allows us to consider every day as human rights day, strive for a more just society, embrace the diversity in Africa and honour the spirit of African Humanism/ Ubuntu as we work with the people we serve. Umuntu, ngumuntu, ngabantu : “A person is a person through other people” Acknowledgements: Special thanks to the mental health service users and advocates who ensure that Mental illness does not stay the “Cinderella” of service delivery Conclusion Barnes, C. 2007. Disability, higher education and the inclusive society. British Journal of Sociology of Education. 28(1):135-145. Deal, M. 2007. Aversive disablism: subtle prejudice toward disabled people. Disability and Society. 22(1):93-97. Gamieldien, F. 2008. Psychosocial rehabilitation. [Conference presentation, Wellington, South Africa]. (Unpublished). Hammel, K.W.2006. Perspectives on Disability and Rehabilitation: Contesting assumptions; challenging practice. Philadelphia: Elsevier/ChurchillLivingstone.55-70 Kronenberg, F. & Pollard, N. 2005. Overcoming occupational apartheid. In Occupational therapy without borders: learning from the spirit of survivors. F. Kronenberg, N. Pollard & S. Simó Algado. Eds. Edinburgh: Elsevier/Churchill Livingstone. 58-86. London, L. 2010. Health and human rights: train-the-trainer course. [Course notes]. Cape Town: University of Cape Town. (Unpublished). Van Zyl, M. 2011. Disability as diversity. [Class notes]. Cape Town: University of Cape Town. (Unpublished). Watermeyer, B. 2006. Disability and psychoanalysis. In Disability and Social Change: a South African agenda. B. Watermeyer, L. Swartz, M. Schneider, T.Lorenzo & M. Priestley. Eds. Pretoria: HSRC Press. 31-43. Human beings do not thrive when isolated from others; therefore this framework requires the consideration of values such as: personhood, morality, respect, human dignity, group consolidarity, compassion and collective unity. Africa is a melting pot of differences and an African model of disability should be ageless, universal, transcultural, indigenous and humanitarian while fostering social consciousness and disability confidence Afribility… the route for getting to the root of it! S E N S I T I V I T Y A N D A W A R E N E S S O F W I S D O M , B E L I E F S , C U L T U R E S U N D E R S T A N D T H E V I E W S O F M E N T A L H E A L T H A N D W E L L B E I N G A L O N G T H E S P E C T R U M O F : I N D I V I D U A L , C A R E R S , C O M M U N I T Y , C O U N T R Y , N A T I O N , W O R L D S E N S I T I V I T Y A N D A W A R E N E S S O F W I S D O M , B E L I E F S , C U L T U R E S U N D E R S T A N D T H E V I E W S O F M E N T A L H E A L T H A N D W E L L B E I N G A L O N G T H E S P E C T R U M O F : I N D I V I D U A L , C A R E R S , C O M M U N I T Y , C O U N T R Y , N A T I O N , W O R L D CONSIDER ACCESS ISSUES GET AROUND TO BE PRODUCTIVE CONSIDER MARKET SHARE WHOLE FAMILY IS AFFECTED BY DISABILITY CONSIDER HOUSEHOLD PARTICIPATION TOOL FOR COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT BUSINESS SENSE TO WIDEN POOL OF POTENTIAL EMPLOYEES AND CONSUMERS CREATE SPACE AND PLACE FOR ENTREPRENEURSHIP CAN THIS PERSON WORK? FULL TIME? PART TIME? NOT AT ALL? CONSIDER IMPACT THIS HAS ON FAMILY FINANCES AND WORKING PATTERNS OF NON ILL FAMILY MEMBERS? FOSTER CHOICES AND OPPORTUNITIES ACROSS THE LIFESPAN PERSONAL GROWTH AND RECOVERY JOURNEY DIGNITY OF INDIVIDUAL FOCUS ON SELF ESTEEM, SELF IDENTITY, SELF BELIEF AND BELONGING RESPONDS TO PEOPLE’S REAL NEEDS FLEXIBILITY INTERDEPENDENCE UNDERSTAND INDEPENDENT LIVING UNDERSTAND AGENCY AND RESILIENCE INNER WORLD AND SELF AWARENESS CONSIDERED CONSIDER: AGE, GENDER, SEXUALITY, RACE, ETHNICITY, RELIGION, CLASS, HOUSING, EDUCATION, IMPAIRMENT OCCUPATIONAL JUSTICE OCCUPATIONAL APARTHEID OCCUPATIONAL MARGINALIZATION SPIRITUALITY ENABLEMENT DISABILITY SECTOR THE LARGEST MINORITY GROUP MARGINALIZATION WITHIN THIS (E.G. DISABLED WOMEN) FOCUS ON PARTICIPATION OF MARGINALIZED GROUP (DISABLED) AND UNDERST AND THE IMPACT OF LANGUAGE USED CONSIDER THE NETWORK OF PEOPLE INVOLVED LEARNING, WORKING AND SOCIALISING ACROSS THE LIFESPAN PROVIDE CHOICE AND OPPORTUNITY IN ENVIRONMENTS OF LIVING, DISABILITY SECTOR THE LARGEST MINORITY GROUP MARGINALIZATION WITHIN THIS (E.G. DISABLED WOMEN) FOCUS ON PARTICIPATION OF MARGINALIZED GROUP (DISABLED) AND UNDERST AND THE IMPACT OF LANGUAGE USED CONSIDER THE NETWORK OF PEOPLE INVOLVED LEARNING, WORKING AND SOCIALISING ACROSS THE LIFESPAN PROVIDE CHOICE AND OPPORTUNITY IN ENVIRONMENTS OF LIVING, • CONSIDER SPIRITUALITY AND RELIGIOUS ISSUES WHAT IS SOCIAL JUSTICE AND RECOURSE FOR POPULATION BEING SERVED • CONSIDER THE NOTIONS OF POVERTY • FOSTER POSITIVE ATTITUDINAL CHANGES • PROVIDE ACCESS TO INFORMATION • INCREASE VISIBILITY THROUGH PARTICIPATION AND PRESENCE • ECONOMIC EMPOWERMENT AND SUSTAINABLE LIVELIHOODS

Fadia Gamieldien (GMLFAD001)

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    4

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Fadia Gamieldien (GMLFAD001)

Poster template by ResearchPosters.co.za

AFRIBILITY UNVEILEDNavigating disability issues in Africa and beyond

Fadia Gamieldien (GMLFAD001) AHS4089F Introduction to Disability as Diversity: Disability Studies Programme, University of Cape Town July 2011)

Introduction

Process

A

B

Results

Discussion

References

Upholding the human rights of vulnerable groups requires an interdisciplinary way of thinking about disability. This comes with intersectoral collaboration between health practitioners, academics, researchers, civil society, disabled peoples’ organisations and community based human resources. This will facilitate reintegration via community engagement, resource mobilisation, strengthening sense of agency in individuals and groups, public- private partnerships and access to information.

An individual can become disabled at any time in their lives and what is functional in one world is not necessarily functional in another. The socio/cultural dynamics which impacts on citizenship for disabled people occurs on a multitude of levels which should consider the notion of justice as it means different things to different people.

This framework considers individual self identity, power, psychodynamics, and connection of self with others versus collective identity in terms of physical, economic, social, emotional, political and moral dimensions. Infrastructure changes to improve access must be addressed along with attitudinal barriers. Awareness of power and privilege is important in terms of addressing the imbalances of the past as even within the disability sector there is a hierarchy of privilege which allows some people to access resources easier than others (Barnes, 2007). According to Deal (2007), subtle forms of prejudice impacts on disabled people and there are gender-specific risk factors for mental health problems that disproportionately affect women. In Africa, women have lower social status than men, experience greater discrimination and are often at the receiving end of gender based physical and sexual violence which is exacerbated by limited access to resources.

African countries also experiences different crises (war, xenophobia, natural disasters) and the aftermath of these has an impact on the mental health needs of survivors.

Models give people an opportunity to shape ideas as well as be shaped by ideas. Different models related to disability have been developed mostly in the West. The reviewer looked at models in the literature and considered the following aspects:

•Does it speak to health as a human rights issue?•Does it consider the African context? •Does it allow for issues of diversity?

The three dominant models are:1. The moral/religious model where the cause of impairments is attributed to wrong doing

and are seen as a divine or moral justice which is part of a supernatural scheme. 2. The medical/individual model which is impairment focused and difficulties faced by

disabled individuals are viewed as their deviation from the ‘norm’ as a result of their functional deficits.

3. The social/political model where disability is framed as a form of oppression as a result of the social experience of having an impairment and not due to the impairment itself (Hammel, 2006:61). It is recognised as the vehicle that has lead to a human rights approach to address the global oppression faced by disabled people.

Western models focus on economics as they have been developed in high income countries, while African countries value indigenous knowledge systems and cultures focussing on the sacred reality of life. This creates an opportunity to consider a socio- ecological approach to disabled people and their environment; with consideration to ethics, spirituality and hope in terms of humans’ connection to the universe and its impact on spiritual wellbeing (Kronenbergand Pollard, 2005:321).

Historically mental illness has been marginalized within the service delivery sector yet it can be the cause as well as be caused by poverty, violence, inequality and HIV/ AIDS.

This model provides a framework for thinking about sustainable reintegration opportunities for disabled people in their environments of choice as these relate to areas of living, learning, working and socializing. The term environment is not restricted to geography but also economic, social, legal, cultural and political structures informing space and place and shaping peoples’ lives (Hammel, 2006:60). It is viewed as a politically relevant model for advocating for the health and wellbeing of disabled people in Africa in terms of intersectionality, positionality and diversity.

The challenge now is for Africa to embrace its history and cultural diversity and access a model applicable for the continent. This model looks at factors to consider to ensure that disabled people are able to carry out gender specific, locally relevant, economic activities within the wider cultural-political environment. Understanding each other well, respecting others, and accepting others will create a more suitable habitat for human kind.

Afribility allows us to consider every day as human rights day, strive for a more just society, embrace the diversity in Africa and honour the spirit of African Humanism/ Ubuntu as we work with the people we serve. Umuntu, ngumuntu, ngabantu :

“A person is a person through other people”

Acknowledgements: Special thanks to the mental health service users and advocates who ensure that Mental illness does not stay the “Cinderella” of service delivery

Conclusion

Barnes, C. 2007. Disability, higher education and the inclusive society. British Journal of Sociology of Education.28(1):135-145.Deal, M. 2007. Aversive disablism: subtle prejudice toward disabled people. Disability and Society. 22(1):93-97.

Gamieldien, F. 2008. Psychosocial rehabilitation. [Conference presentation, Wellington, South Africa]. (Unpublished).Hammel, K.W.2006. Perspectives on Disability and Rehabilitation: Contesting assumptions; challenging practice. Philadelphia: Elsevier/ChurchillLivingstone.55-70Kronenberg, F. & Pollard, N. 2005. Overcoming occupational apartheid. In Occupational therapy without borders:

learning from the spirit of survivors. F. Kronenberg, N. Pollard & S. Simó Algado. Eds. Edinburgh: Elsevier/Churchill Livingstone. 58-86.London, L. 2010. Health and human rights: train-the-trainer course. [Course notes]. Cape Town: University of Cape Town. (Unpublished).Van Zyl, M. 2011. Disability as diversity. [Class notes]. Cape Town: University of Cape Town. (Unpublished).Watermeyer, B. 2006. Disability and psychoanalysis. In Disability and Social Change: a South African agenda. B. Watermeyer, L. Swartz, M. Schneider, T.Lorenzo & M. Priestley. Eds. Pretoria: HSRC Press. 31-43.

Human beings do not thrive when isolated from others; therefore this framework requires the consideration of values such as: personhood, morality, respect, human dignity, group consolidarity, compassion and collective unity. Africa is a melting pot of differences and an African model of disability should be ageless, universal, transcultural, indigenous and humanitarian while fostering social consciousness and disability confidence

Afribility… the route for getting to the root of it!•

SENS

ITIV

ITY

AND

AWAR

ENES

S OF

WIS

DOM

, BEL

IEFS

, CUL

TURE

S• UNDERST

AND

THE

VIEW

S OF

MEN

TAL

HEAL

TH A

ND W

ELLB

EING

ALO

NG T

HE S

PECT

RUM

OF:

INDI

VIDU

AL,C

ARER

S, C

OMM

UNIT

Y, C

OUNT

RY, N

ATIO

N , W

ORLD

• SE

NSIT

IVIT

Y AN

D AW

AREN

ESS

OF W

ISDO

M, B

ELIE

FS, C

ULTU

RES

• UNDERSTAN

D TH

E VI

EWS

OF M

ENTA

L HE

ALTH

AND

WEL

LBEI

NG A

LONG

THE

SPE

CTRU

M O

F: IN

DIVI

DUAL

,CAR

ERS,

COM

MUN

ITY,

COU

NTRY

, NAT

ION

, WOR

LD

• CONSIDER ACCESS ISSUES• GET AROUND TO BE PRODUCTIVE• CONSIDER MARKET SHARE WHOLE FAMILY IS AFFECTED BY DISABILITY• CONSIDER HOUSEHOLD PARTICIPATION• TOOL FOR COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT • BUSINESS SENSE TO WIDEN POOL OF POTENTIAL EMPLOYEES AND CONSUMERS• CREATE SPACE AND PLACE FOR ENTREPRENEURSHIP• CAN THIS PERSON WORK? FULL TIME? PART TIME? NOT AT ALL?• CONSIDER IMPACT THIS HAS ON FAMILY FINANCES AND WORKING PATTERNS OF NON ILL FAMILY MEMBERS?• FOSTER CHOICES AND OPPORTUNITIES ACROSS THE LIFESPAN

• PERSONAL GROWTH AND RECOVERY JOURNEY• DIGNITY OF INDIVIDUAL• FOCUS ON SELF ESTEEM, SELF IDENTITY, SELF BELIEF AND BELONGING• RESPONDS TO PEOPLE’S REAL NEEDS • FLEXIBILITY• INTERDEPENDENCE• UNDERSTAND INDEPENDENT LIVING • UNDERSTAND AGENCY AND RESILIENCE• INNER WORLD AND SELF AWARENESS CONSIDERED• CONSIDER: AGE, GENDER, SEXUALITY, RACE, ETHNICITY, RELIGION, CLASS, HOUSING, EDUCATION, IMPAIRMENT

• OCCUPATIONAL JUSTICE• OCCUPATIONAL APARTHEID• OCCUPATIONAL MARGINALIZATION• SPIRITUALITY• ENABLEMENT

• DISABILITY SEC

TOR TH

E LARGES

T MINORITY

GROUP

MARGINALIZATION WITHIN THIS (E

.G. DISABLED WOMEN)

• FOCUS ON PARTICIPATION OF M

ARGINALIZED GROUP (D

ISABLED) AND

• UNDERSTAND THE IMPACT OF LANGUAGE USED

• CONSIDER THE NETWORK OF PEOPLE INVOLVED

LEARNING, WORKING AND SOCIALISING ACROSS THE LIFESPAN

• PROVIDE CHOICE AND OPPORTUNITY IN ENVIRONMENTS OF LIVING,

• DISABILITY SEC

TOR TH

E LARGES

T MINORITY

GROUP

MARGINALIZATION WITHIN THIS (E

.G. DISABLED WOMEN)

• FOCUS ON PARTICIPATION OF M

ARGINALIZED GROUP (D

ISABLED) AND

• UNDERSTAND THE IMPACT OF LANGUAGE USED

• CONSIDER THE NETWORK OF PEOPLE INVOLVED

LEARNING, WORKING AND SOCIALISING ACROSS THE LIFESPAN

• PROVIDE CHOICE AND OPPORTUNITY IN ENVIRONMENTS OF LIVING,

• CONSIDER SPIRITUALITY AND RELIGIOUS ISSUES

• WHAT IS SOCIAL JUSTICE AND RECOURSE FOR POPULATION BEING SERVED

• CONSIDER THE NOTIONS OF POVERTY

• FOSTER POSITIVE ATTITUDINAL CHANGES

• PROVIDE ACCESS TO INFORMATION

• INCREASE VISIBILITY THROUGH PARTICIPATION AND

PRESENCE

• ECONOMIC EMPOWERMENT AND SUSTAINABLE

LIVELIHOODS