Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Faculdade de Ciências
Departamento de Ciências Biológicas
SECOSUD II – Setembro de 2018
Assessment of land use, land use change and
forest in Mozambique through
Collect Earth
By
Edna T. Munjovo, Joaquim D. Campira
1This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License
1.INTRODUCTION
Population growth
2
SE
CO
SU
D I
I
Con
serv
ati
on
an
d e
qu
ita
ble
use
of
bio
logic
al
div
ers
ity i
n t
he S
AD
C r
egio
n
Changes on ecological footprint
T15 (3): Desertification and degraded land
correction
➢ Evaluate land use, land use change and forestry in 25,000 plots randomly placed
across the country between 2001 to 2016.
➢ Provide the resulting data to SADC institutions as a baseline to define LDN
targets.
2. OBJECTIVESS
EC
OS
UD
II
Con
serv
ati
on
an
d e
qu
ita
ble
use o
f b
iolo
gic
al
div
ers
ity i
n t
he S
AD
C r
egio
n
3
3. METHODOLOGY
3.1. Main tools
SE
CO
SU
D I
I
Con
serv
ati
on
an
d e
qu
ita
ble
use o
f b
iolo
gic
al
div
ers
ity i
n t
he S
AD
C r
egio
n
12
3
3.12.1 2.2 2.3
4
Classification
3.2. Basics elements (cards)
Target plot
Grid
Identity card
FAO
SE
CO
SU
D I
I
Con
serv
ati
on
an
d e
qu
ita
ble
use o
f b
iolo
gic
al
div
ers
ity i
n t
he S
AD
C r
egio
n
IPCC
National
b
a
c d
30%
10%
20%
Total plots: > 25 0005
4.RESULTS
4.1. Land use and land use change between 2001 and 2016
Legend:
SE
CO
SU
D I
I
Con
serv
ati
on
an
d e
qu
ita
ble
use o
f b
iolo
gic
al
div
ers
ity i
n t
he S
AD
C r
egio
n
Floresta Área Agrícola Pradaria Outros Usos Áreas Alagadas Áreas UrbanasForest Cropland Grassland Other land Water land Settlement
59.8%14.8%
21.8%
58.2%17.5%
20.6%
0.6% 1.9% 1.0% 0.6% 1.2%1.9%
2001
6
SE
CO
SU
D I
I
Con
serv
ati
on
an
d e
qu
ita
ble
use
of
bio
logic
al
div
ers
ity i
n t
he S
AD
C r
egio
n
2016
7
4.2. Current Land use subtypes - National ClassificationS
EC
OS
UD
II
Con
serv
ati
on
an
d e
qu
ita
ble
use
of
bio
logic
al
div
ers
ity i
n t
he S
AD
C r
egio
n
1% 3%
2%
19%
18%
1%
5%
1%
17%
17%
9%
3%
1% 1% 1%
Montain forest Closed evergreen fores Opened evergreen forest Closed deciduous forest
Opened deciduous forest Mangrove Mopane Mecruse
Cropland Grassland Shrubland Thicket
Plantation Settlement Water body Other lands
8
4.3. Current land use per provinceS
EC
OS
UD
II
Con
serv
ati
on
an
d e
qu
ita
ble
use o
f b
iolo
gic
al
div
ers
ity i
n t
he S
AD
C r
egio
n
67%
14%
0%
17%
1% 1%Cabo Delgado
65%9%1%
22%
2%1%
Gaza
67%
15%
0%
14%
3% 1%
Inhambane
62%17%
1%
19%
1%
Manica
39%
14%0%
39%
3%5%
Maputo
37%
36%
2%
22%
1% 2%Nampula
71%
9%
20%
Niassa
54%
12%
0%
29%
4%
Sofala
60%13%
1%
22%
3%1%
Tete
47%
33%
1%
16%
2% 1%
Zambezia
Legend:
Floresta Área Agrícola Pradaria Outros Usos Áreas Alagadas Áreas UrbanasForest Cropland Grassland Other land Water land Settlement 8
49.28
3.071.76
47.96
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Área FlorestalInicial
Perda de Floresta Ganho de Floresta Área Florestal Atual
Millio
ns
(ha)
SE
CO
SU
D I
I
Con
serv
ati
on
an
d e
qu
ita
ble
use o
f b
iolo
gic
al
div
ers
ity i
n t
he S
AD
C r
egio
n
2001 2016Gain forest Lost forest
4.4. Forest dynamic between 2001 and 2016
Lost and gain in forest cover Forest to cropland
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
2000
Broadleaf
mixed
forest
Broadleaf
evergreen
forest
Broadleaf
deciduous
forest
Eucalyptus
plantation
Other
plantations
Acacia
wodland
Th
ou
san
ds
F>C
≈ 2M
F>S
≈ 58K
G>F
≈1M
C>S
≈ 69K
9
6.2% of the initial forest has been lost
-20,000.00
-15,000.00
-10,000.00
-5,000.00
0.00
5,000.00
10,000.00
15,000.00
20,000.00
25,000.00
30,000.00
35,000.00
-500,000.00
-400,000.00
-300,000.00
-200,000.00
-100,000.00
0.00
100,000.00
200,000.00
300,000.00
400,000.00
500,000.00
Niassa
NampulaZambézia
Maputo
-400,000.00
-300,000.00
-200,000.00
-100,000.00
0.00
100,000.00
200,000.00
300,000.00
-800,000.00
-600,000.00
-400,000.00
-200,000.00
0.00
200,000.00
400,000.00
600,000.00
800,000.00
Legend:
Floresta Área Agrícola Pradaria Outros Usos Áreas Alagadas Áreas UrbanasForest Cropland Grassland Other land Water land Settlement
10
4.5. Land use change per provinceS
EC
OS
UD
II
Con
serv
ati
on
an
d e
qu
ita
ble
use o
f b
iolo
gic
al
div
ers
ity i
n t
he S
AD
C r
egio
n
SE
CO
SU
D I
I
Con
serv
ati
on
an
d e
qu
ita
ble
use o
f b
iolo
gic
al
div
ers
ity i
n t
he S
AD
C r
egio
n
49.0
49.1
49.2
49.3
49.4
49.5
49.6
49.7
49.8
49.9
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
Are
a Millio
ns
Year
Floresta
3
5
7
9
11
13
15
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
Are
a Millio
ns
Year
Área Agrícola
16.817.017.217.417.617.818.018.218.418.618.8
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
Are
a
Millio
ns
Year
Pradaria
0.760.780.800.820.840.860.880.900.920.940.96
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
Are
a
Millio
ns
Year
Área Urbana
Forest Cropland
SettlementGrassland
4.6. Land use change between 2001 and 2016
Land use change 11
4.7. Disturbance factorsS
EC
OS
UD
II
Con
serv
ati
on
an
d e
qu
ita
ble
use o
f b
iolo
gic
al
div
ers
ity i
n t
he S
AD
C r
egio
n
Main disturbance factors in forest
12
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
Th
ou
san
ds
SE
CO
SU
D I
I
Con
serv
ati
on
an
d e
qu
ita
ble
use o
f b
iolo
gic
al
div
ers
ity i
n t
he S
AD
C r
egio
n
5. CONCLUSION
➢ In Mozambique land use changes vary according to the characteristics of each
province (e.g.: demography).
➢ In the 2001-2016 period 6.2% (3.07 million hectares) of the initial forest has been
converted, mainly to agriculture.
➢ About 2.1 million hectares of the remaining forest area may be lost in coming years
due to the occurrence of factors such as shifting agriculture, logging, coal
production.
Collect earth is powerful tool that can be used to evaluate land use and land use
changes in future.
SE
CO
SU
D I
I
Con
serv
ati
on
an
d e
qu
ita
ble
use o
f b
iolo
gic
al
div
ers
ity i
n t
he S
AD
C r
egio
n
Thank you
2000 2018Campus principal da UEM
