23
International Journal of Economics, Commerce and Management United Kingdom Vol. IV, Issue 8, August 2016 Licensed under Creative Common Page 603 http://ijecm.co.uk/ ISSN 2348 0386 FACTORS PROMOTING ENTERPRISE LEVEL UNION - MANAGEMENT PARTNERSHIP IN THE GARMENT INDUSTRY OF CAMBODIA Shirley Samuel Gurunathan Joseph IIC University of Technology, Cambodia [email protected] Leow Chee Seng IIC University of Technology, Cambodia [email protected] Abstract This concept paper presents the problem statement and literature review for a study titled “Factors promoting enterprise level union-management partnership in the garment industry of Cambodia”. It looks at the purpose for study and the literature available to propose partnership relationships between the enterprise union and management in the garment industry to significantly improve the existing adversarial relationship between the union and management. This concept paper discusses the importance of partnership between union and management in the garment industry of Cambodia especially with the implementation of the Law on Unions of Enterprise in 2016. Keywords: Employee Voice, Engagement Culture, Garment Industry, Learning, Legislation, Organizational Structure, Role of Manager, Trust, Union-Management Partnership INTRODUCTION Development and the birth of trade unions in Cambodia may be broken up into three important intervals. Between 1979 and 1990, Cambodia was under a centrally-planned political-economic system, with state-controlled unions. Following the failure of the centrally-planned system, arrived the first stage of unions organising in a market economy. During this time, the 1993

FACTORS PROMOTING ENTERPRISE LEVEL UNION - …ijecm.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/4838.pdf · Development and the birth of trade unions in Cambodia may be broken up into three

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    2

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

International Journal of Economics, Commerce and Management United Kingdom Vol. IV, Issue 8, August 2016

Licensed under Creative Common Page 603

http://ijecm.co.uk/ ISSN 2348 0386

FACTORS PROMOTING ENTERPRISE LEVEL

UNION - MANAGEMENT PARTNERSHIP IN

THE GARMENT INDUSTRY OF CAMBODIA

Shirley Samuel Gurunathan Joseph

IIC University of Technology, Cambodia

[email protected]

Leow Chee Seng

IIC University of Technology, Cambodia

[email protected]

Abstract

This concept paper presents the problem statement and literature review for a study titled

“Factors promoting enterprise level union-management partnership in the garment industry of

Cambodia”. It looks at the purpose for study and the literature available to propose partnership

relationships between the enterprise union and management in the garment industry to

significantly improve the existing adversarial relationship between the union and management.

This concept paper discusses the importance of partnership between union and management in

the garment industry of Cambodia especially with the implementation of the Law on Unions of

Enterprise in 2016.

Keywords: Employee Voice, Engagement Culture, Garment Industry, Learning, Legislation,

Organizational Structure, Role of Manager, Trust, Union-Management Partnership

INTRODUCTION

Development and the birth of trade unions in Cambodia may be broken up into three important

intervals. Between 1979 and 1990, Cambodia was under a centrally-planned political-economic

system, with state-controlled unions. Following the failure of the centrally-planned system,

arrived the first stage of unions organising in a market economy. During this time, the 1993

© Joseph & Seng

Licensed under Creative Common Page 604

Constitution and the 1997 Labour Law were enacted creating the legal landscape for unions

organizing to boom. The third period, 1997 to the present time, union organising continued and

intensified with management of enterprises resisting unionism. This period was also

characterised by alignments, realignments and divisions between and within the leading union

organisations.

In the garment industry of Cambodia, where unionisation is estimated at 60%, the

effectiveness of having so many unions is questionable, leaves many unions weak, under–

funded, competing with one another and subject to corruption and political interference (Arnold,

2013). According to Nuan and Serrano (2010), unions and employers in Cambodia often do not

have the knowledge or tools to engage in dialogue and dispute prevention measures including

collective bargaining. They also mentioned that employers have complained about multiple

competing unions and strikes while unions voiced out their concerns over low wages, anti-union

discrimination, and abuse of short-term contracts.

Furthermore International Labour Organization perceives the Law on Unions of

Enterprise violates the ILO convention on collective bargaining and opens the door for

authorities to abuse the law (Mom & Sean, 2014). With the implementation of the Law on

Unions of Enterprise in Cambodia in 2016, both unions and management must find the best way

to enhance cooperation between each other to foster good union-management relations in the

event this law stifles the freedom of association among workers in Cambodia.

Problem Statement

The intense union avoidance by employers due to unions motivating workers to become

organised and join the union by pushing for increase in wages, job security, improvement in

working conditions, improvements in safety and health standards and channel to voice

grievances is a common feature among garment factory employers in Cambodia. Employers are

also requested for ―cooperation fees‖ by unions in order to reduce demands made by their

members or to get the unionised workers to cooperate with the management. Employers are

also faced by inappropriate pressure through reports released by Workers Right Movement and

Non-Governmental Organizations (NGO) accusing them of violating workers freedom of

association. Such reports may induce boycott from International consumers from buying

garments produced in Cambodia.

There is on-going labour unrest in the garment factories due to demands for higher

wages and benefits made by unions. Table 1 and 2 and Figure 1 and 2 shows the number of

strikes and man days lost reported by the Garment Manufacturers Association of Cambodia

(GMAC) which clearly shows the on-going labour unrest in the garment industry of Cambodia.

International Journal of Economics, Commerce and Management, United Kingdom

Licensed under Creative Common Page 605

Table 1: Number of Strikes Reported by GMAC Members

Number of Strikes in Cambodia (Reported by GMAC members)

Jan Feb Mar April May Jun July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Total Change Percentage

2003 3 3 4 10 4 10 3 5 2 2 8 1 55

2004 4 6 13 8 9 12 14 5 3 3 2 5 84 29 52.7%

2005 6 4 6 6 7 7 4 6 7 5 4 4 66 -18 -21.4%

2006 4 8 6 6 13 8 13 7 6 8 2 5 86 20 30.3%

2007 10 7 3 6 3 7 12 6 6 4 10 6 80 -6 -7.0%

2008 4 6 26 14 5 4 7 13 10 6 7 3 105 25 31.3%

2009 3 4 5 2 4 11 9 6 6 2 3 3 58 -47 -44.8%

2010 2 4 5 0 1 1 15 5 5 0 5 2 45 -13 -22.4%

2011 5 4 4 1 0 3 1 5 2 3 2 4 34 -11 -24.4%

2012 7 16 9 10 14 12 13 11 10 7 4 8 121 87 255.9%

2013 11 13 16 8 11 14 10 9 14 15 10 16 147 26 21.5%

2014 8 4 11 15 4 10 4 9 13 8 8 14 108 -39 -26.5%

2015 18 11 11 6 11 10 12 6 5 3 4 19 118 10 9.26%

2016 5

Source: www.gmac-cambodia.org/strike/

Figure 1: Number of Strikes in Cambodia (Reported by GMAC Members)

Table 2: Lost Man Days (Reported by GMAC Members)

Source: www.gmac-cambodia.org/strike/

© Joseph & Seng

Licensed under Creative Common Page 606

Table 2. Lost Man Days

Lost Man Days (Reported by GMAC members)

Jan Feb Mar April May Jun July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Total Change Percentage

2003 7,315 3,660 12,550 11,176 8,040 51,424 2,621 6,857 12,600 683 13,071 287 130,284

2004 12,054 7,024 8,139 7,299 12,030 11,579 20,680 20,325 1,295 1,862 1,880 2,945 107,112 -23,172 -17.8%

2005 5,190 1,281 4,847 7,100 2,785 7,835 2,425 4,607 5,947 3,370 4,420 2,612 52,419 -54,693 -51.1%

2006 6,611 39,730 16,928 31,563 86,724 49,184 24,387 21,074 16,376 31,622 6,184 13,330 343,713 291,294 555.7%

2007 36,246 18,320 12,816 13,934 10,207 11,154 27,979 14,960 52,320 33,148 38,848 24,210 294,142 -49,571 -14.4%

2008 17,450 25,826 43,181 33,427 21,450 10,438 17,665 35,359 39,958 18,673 36,125 4,844 304,396 10,254 3.5%

2009 33,450 24,605 13,881 5,378 26,138 69,713 15,644 22,363 53,822 1,751 29,083 18,138 313,966 9,570 3.1%

2010 27,300 26,392 13,542 0 1,200 8,000 68,852 21,026 22,033 0 7,959 5,900 202,204 -111,762 -35.6%

2011 4,238 27,280 7,780 2,200 0 19,224 3,000 20,360 8,400 30,600 5,580 10851 139,513 -62,691 -31.0%

2012 26,071 76,382 19,452 20,662 122,520 62,179 56,288 88,173 38,200 14,140 9,130 9,630 542,827 403,314 289.1%

2013 58,580 52,860 85,655 31,404 87,267

107,553 25,413 88,704 112,125 91,600 84,485 62,881 888,527 345,700 63.7%

2014 32,362 4,753 82,660 115,750 24,255 34312 22630 58030 15050 90400 10722 36020 526,944 -361583 -40.6%

2015 18,

080 21400 17253.5 11940 37541 77550 109304 11370 7066 3073 10713 138540 452,364 -74,581

-

14.1534015

2016 16709

Source: www.gmac-cambodia.org/strike/

Figure 2: Lost Man Days (Reported by GMAC Members)

Source: www.gmac-cambodia.org/strike/

International Journal of Economics, Commerce and Management, United Kingdom

Licensed under Creative Common Page 607

Poor government enforcement during labour unrest also contributes to the frequency of the

labour unrest in the garment factories in Cambodia. Due to the ongoing demands for higher

wages and benefits by the unions, it is becoming harder for Cambodia to compete with low-

wage countries such as Vietnam, Myanmar, Bangladesh and Laos.

In Yarrington, Townsend, and Brown (2007) findings, managers and unions agreed that

the nature of relationships changed due to government legislation and factors such as trust,

communication, employee voice, respecting rules, professional credibility and role of managers

play an important role in developing good union-management partnership relations. For the

purpose of this study, other factors which are engagement culture and organizational structure

have been included in this study besides the factors mentioned by Yarrington et al. (2007)to

examine its importance in developing union-management partnership relations in garment

factories of Cambodia.

Need of the Study

The purpose of this study is to find ways to avoid adversarial relationship between enterprise

union and management and promote a harmonious relationship through partnerships between

enterprise union and management in the Garment Industry of Cambodia. Factors such as trust,

employee voice, role of managers, organizational structure, legislation, learning and

engagement culture has to be researched to understand its role in promoting partnerships

between union and management to foster beneficial union-management relationship in the in

the Garment Industry of Cambodia.

Garment factories and enterprise level unions in Cambodia are constantly reported in

the press for various violations of labour laws and freedom of association as well as violence

towards workers and managers. Management is seen as trying to intimidate and threaten

workers seeking to form unions and assert their labour rights and cases of union

representatives and leaders being terminated as a result of their union activities still happen as

a means of union avoidance by the management.

Union leaders are known for working for their own interested and ―secretly‖ ask for

cooperation fees from the management to settle disputes. Many union leaders have no intention

to resolve disputes amicably but rather prefer to ―stretch‖ the problems further just to show their

members that they are able to ―distract‖ the management from their daily activities and be

bogged with disputes resolving activities

Furthermore unions accuse the factories of using short term fixed duration contracts as a

union-busting technique to prevent the workers from unionizing. Unions perceive that fixed

duration contract workers are in fear of being fired if they involve themselves in union activities.

© Joseph & Seng

Licensed under Creative Common Page 608

The minimum wage for regular workers increased from USD45 in 1997 to USD61 in 2010, an

increase of USD16 for the past 13 years which amounts to USD1.23 per year (Sophal, 2011).

Again in May 2013 the minimum wage was increased to USD80, February 2014 to USD100 and

January 2015 to USD128 (Sophal, 2011).

The minimum wage is once again increased to USD140 effective January 1st, 2016 but

the unions are demanding that the minimum wage should be USD207 and keep on demanding

that the minimu wage should be adjusted according to the cost of living. It is becoming harder

for Cambodia to compete with low-wage countries such as Vietnam, Myanmar, Bangladesh and

Laos (Dara, 2015).

Research Questions

This study is guided by the following seven research questions:

Does trust promote enterprise level union-management partnership in the Garment Industry

of Cambodia?

Does employee voice promote enterprise level union-management partnership in the

Garment Industry of Cambodia?

Does the role of managers promote enterprise level union-management partnership in the

Garment Industry of Cambodia?

Does organizational structure promote enterprise level union-management partnership in

the Garment Industry of Cambodia?

Does legislation promote enterprise level union-management partnership in the Garment

Industry of Cambodia?

Does learning promote enterprise level union-management partnership in the Garment

Industry of Cambodia?

Does engagement culture promote enterprise level union-management partnership in the

Garment Industry of Cambodia?

How do Unions and Management Benefit from Partnership?

Cooperation and change are more difficult to bring about in union setting. The institutional

relations between labour and management, the long history of conflict and mistrust,

management‘s continual need to reduce costs and maintain and enhance productivity, the

unions‘ role in protecting the job security and earnings of its members, combine to make

organizational changes more difficult. In spite of this, there is a rich history of union-

management cooperation (Schuster & Weidman, 2006). Companies and unions have

International Journal of Economics, Commerce and Management, United Kingdom

Licensed under Creative Common Page 609

developed pragmatic solutions to significant problems affecting the workplace when traditional

power strategies such strikes, picketing, boycotts, and exercise of management rights were

ineffective (Schuster, 1984). Based on the problem statement of this study the following issues

are discussed.

Union Avoidance by the Management

According to Ozley (1998), management avoids union through union busting and hardball

tactics. In union busting tactics, management tries to get unionised employees to de-certify

their union. Ozley warns that this is extremely difficult and legally risky and may result in the

loss of ―good will‖ towards the company. The advantage of this tactic is that management can

―create and live in a hostile environment for a long time‖. Another tactic mentioned by Ozley is

the hardball tactic. He explains that management rejects any demands or suggestions made by

the union, decides on its own solutions to problems and uses pressure, coercion and persuasive

arguments right to arbitration stage.

Reasons for Labour Unrest and Unions Taking an Adversary Stand towards Management

Research conducted by Ahmed, Raihan, and Islam (2003) in Bangladesh show that the lack of

minimum facility and safety at work, sub-standard living conditions, deferred payment of wages

and benefits, international conspiracy and coercive role of the law enforcing agency, too much

dependency on buyers, pressures from the workers and local terrorists, use of workers by

others and rumors, un-fulfillment of education demands of their children, distorted minded

workers, political instability of the country, too much workload, lack of promotion opportunity,

insufficient wages to survive etc., are the primary source of labour unrest. They conclude that

the policy makers of Bangladesh should design policies that minimize the labour problems and

uncertainties in the garment sector by taking into considerations the causes mentioned above.

Reasons Dispute Resolution Channels are not Effective and Constantly Being Frustrated

by the Unions or Management

According to a research conducted by Robinson and Freidman (1995), union representatives

underestimate management‘s concern for harmful acts against workers, or management‘s

sincere wish to negotiate in good faith within the financial constraints, and were generally highly

suspicious of management motives and intentions towards workers. They also conclude that

managers saw union representatives as unreasonable, and under estimate union capabilities

and unwillingness to accept extenuating circumstances and that negotiations will be significantly

improved if such misconstrues can be tackled and debunked prior or during negotiations.

© Joseph & Seng

Licensed under Creative Common Page 610

Impact of Legislation

In his book, Willman (1998), the Conservative government in the United Kingdom sought to

tame what they saw as the excessive power of trade unions. Willman explained that new

legislation regulating the rights, responsibilities, and internal government processes of unions

was central to this search; in 1980, 1984, 1988, and 1993, Acts of Parliament detailed measure

which unions perceived as typically unacceptable and disruptive. Yet, resistance to regulations,

especially following the miners' strike in 1984-85, failed to prove effective and British unions had

to come to terms with a new legal context due to their activities.

Furthermore the new Law on Union of Enterprise in Cambodia is perceived by labour

groups, human rights advocates, and opposition politicians as a move by the government to

weaken the workers‘ movement in Cambodia by the following ways: First, the scope of the law

excludes informal workers, civil servants, teachers, and domestic workers. A separate law is

required to provide legal protection for these workers, raising questions about the motivations

for this lack of inclusiveness. Second, the inclusion of age, residency and literacy requirements

for prospective union leaders can be read as restrictions on the right of workers. Third, labour

groups have decried the financial reporting requirement as being overly burdensome. Lastly,

there are also predictably provisions that would make strike action difficult, if not altogether

impossible. All these issues combine to undermine workers‘ right to free association in

Cambodia.

Corrupt Practices among Union and Management

According to Arnold (2013), the rapid increase of unions and federations correlates with the rise

of unions as businesses. Running a union can be profitable, as corrupt unions can seek

kickbacks from employers as a means to raise extra money in other ways.

Creating Effective Partnerships between Union and Management Relationship

Partnership is a way to move adversarial industrial relations to problem‐solving outcomes

among unions, managers and workers (Guest and Peccei, 2001, Martinez Lucio and Stuart,

2004; Dietz, 2004; Roche and Geary, 2006). According to Ratnam (2006), two-way

communication, facilitates cooperation, information sharing, and transparent management are

prerequisites for developing a problem-solving approach, mutual trust and understanding,

shared values, beliefs and objectives are essential to facilitate cooperation between union and

management. Hence, there exists a need to orient, train and prepare managers about their

duties, to consult and communicate, and seek co-operation with workers and unions. Ratnam

goes on to say that workers and unions should be unaware of their rights and duties, and roles

International Journal of Economics, Commerce and Management, United Kingdom

Licensed under Creative Common Page 611

and obligations concerning accessibility to information and show demonstrated interest and

readiness to participate with the spirit of co-operation in joint consultation.

Effective union-management management teams have mutually understood goals, clear

roles and responsibilities, efficient operating procedures, constructive personal relationships and

an ability to resolve conflict in a timely manner (Grant & Clarkson, 2001). They go on to say that

ideal partnerships are able to conduct effective meetings, identify and solve problems, give and

receive information and are able to make decisions and evaluate progress. Studies conducted

by Meyer (2013) supported that unions, when coupled with good employee relations, facilitate

the adoption of high performance work practices and consequently have a positive impact on on

organizational competitiveness.

A survey conducted by Asuyama and Neou (2010), found that labour disputes and

labour union problems seems to have improved due to the increased dialogue between labour

unions and other stakeholders. Soon (2013) study shows that partnership ideology has a

positive relationship for the union and decision making process and which reinforces the

partnership debate of mutual gains that balance actor interest has been dominant in the

literature.

RELATED THEORIES

The evolution of the trade unions has been interpreted in different ways by different authorities.

Their views are expressed in the form of ideologies, approaches, theories, etc. The purpose of

such approaches and theories has been to explain the basic motivating factors behind union

growth and bargaining policies. Unions engage in a wide variety of functions, ranging from

organisation of works to maintaining and protecting their rights. The following theories of labour

movements were as follows:

Marxian Class Struggle Theory / Revolutionary Theory

Webb‘s Theory of Industrial Democracy

Cole‘s Theory of Industrial Unionism

Hoxie‘s Theory of Business Union

Tannenbaum‘s Anti-Technology Theory

Common‘s Pragmatic Approach Theory

Perlman‘s Theory of scarcity consciousness

Kerr and Associates Protest Theory

© Joseph & Seng

Licensed under Creative Common Page 612

THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK

A number of studies have been conducted on various aspects of the variables used to build the

Analytical Model in this study.

Trust and Union-Management Partnership

Daud and Tumin (2013) say that trade union must be able to build trust among members

especially during early stage of formation. Membership rate will increase if employees trust the

union. A study conducted by Finnerty (2008) concludes that trust is the foundation for building a

more cooperative and collaborative relationship between management and the union. According

to Reina and Reina (2010) "When we break agreements with others, we disempower the

relationship and compromise the trust between us. They express that if we repeatedly fail to

honor our agreements, we decrease the capacity for trust in our relationships". Labour disputes,

imposed collective agreements, wage cuts and contracting out result in a cycle of distrust.

Employee Voice and Union-Management Partnership

A research conducted by Bennet (2010) investigated HRM practitioners and union

representative experiences of employee voice initiatives at work. Marchington (2005) model of

engagement can be used as a conceptual framework for evaluation. Marchington

conceptualizes the following four essential facets of participation which would be the degree of

engagement signifies the extent to which workers or their representatives are able to influence

management decision-making. A study conducted by Buttigieg, Deery, and Iverson (2014)

indicates that members having a higher union satisfaction especially when they perceive that

their leaders to be highly responsive to their needs and concern, are more willing to express

voice.

According to Fitzpatrick (1998), unionised staff tends to be better informed and

managers see unions as a way of building commitment to business plans. An additional benefit

comes from having an alternative feedback channel. Internal communications managers are

well versed in the need to collect reactions, views and concerns from staff. However, when

there is only one channel for collecting feedback, there will always be suspicions about the

quality of information being gathered. Trade union representatives can be seen as independent

voices in the workplace, challenging both the rumours of their peers and the messages of the

management. Although managers may not welcome being questioned on matters such as

business strategy or tactics, they should be aware that an even handed representative will add

powerful support when it is appropriate.

International Journal of Economics, Commerce and Management, United Kingdom

Licensed under Creative Common Page 613

Neil and Robinson (2012), conducted a survey which showed that nurses‘ level of

disengagement and management agreed to a significant culture shift away from ―adversarial

management‖ versus ―union positioning‖ was needed which lead to running workshops, one of

the agreed key principles to ensure effective partnership was to communicate openly, honestly

and respectfully, question when they don‘t know and not to assume; seek to understand all

perspectives; value each other and be non-judgmental; and stand for equality.

Role of Manager and Union-Management Partnership

McGuire, Mc. Guire and Sanderson (2013), studied the evolution of a line manager‘s roles and

responsibilities and the relationships line managers have fostered with HR functions and trade

unions. The role that trade unions lay in the workplace in UK has changed dramatically in

recent years. Trade unions traditionally used an adversarial approach, which was against the

interest of management. However, in an era of declining unionization rates, trade unions have

progressively moved towards partnership working, providing employers and managers with a

wide range of information services through networking, marketing and advisory services.

Moreover, trade union interest are focusing more and more on a balanced work-life balance,

employee empowerment and matters related to managerial and employee conduct and

behavior. It is becoming more evident that trade unions have become allies with line managers

to legitimize organizational change and voicing employee concerns and anxieties to senior

management in the organization. Their findings reveal that when there is a transference of HR

responsibilities to line managers of HR activities including selection and recruitment, grievance

and discipline, absence management and individuals development, line managers reported a

shift of working relationship from an adversarial way of a more two way cooperative relationship.

Based on Yarington, Townsend, and Brown (2007) findings, when an individual is seen to be an

experienced IR professional the advantages are two folds. Primarily, it seems that they are far

more prone to benefit from their own experiences and seen more positively by their fellow

practitioners.

According to Grandz (2009), ―leaders must have a vision and that effective leaders are

good at understanding the wide variety of physical, economic, psycho-social, and emotional

needs that people have, and in their ability to tailor a ―vision‖ so that it promises to satisfy unmet

needs‖.

Organizational Structure and Union-Management Partnership

Based on OECD LEED forum on partnerships and local governance, to become efficient, a

partnership needs to have recognizable and autonomous structure to bring about its identity

© Joseph & Seng

Licensed under Creative Common Page 614

(Michael, 2006). The structure must have stability and permanence together with flexibility, with

a specific amount of autonomy, i.e. independent from political influence. It is also important to

review lines of communication to ensure that all partners are kept informed and involved.

Partnership enjoys social and political approval and partners acknowledge the

practicalities of the political tasks and show determination with a strong sense of ownership

feeling. Deals are based on identifiable duties, shared privileges and obligations, and therefore

are signed by all relevant partners. The partnership takes an inclusive approach whereby

pertinent actors are involved in planning and setup). Robust commitment the partners from

each is seen in the fact that all partner enterprises are equally represented and, where feasible,

represented by experienced people who can impact within their organization due to their

influence.

Legislation and Union-Management Partnership

According to Doherty (2008), traditionally, trade unions in UK and Ireland have maintained the

role of representing employees, but declining union participation has meant that ―union only

voice‖ is now the way in only a minority organizations and thus, it may be argued that where

organizations have few, or no, voice and involvement arrangement in place, and where trade

union membership is not an option, employees are in a weak position to advance their case in

the absence of any legal right. Equally, employers may take all opportunity to avoid involving

employees in their organizations in the absence of any legal requirements to (Teague, 2004).

A report to the Solidarity Center, compiled by Schurman and Eaton (2013), mentions

that another major collaboration between the international community and the local labour

community in Cambodia was the birth of the new Law on Union of Enterprise. It contains

specific language for the inclusion of all workers to have the ability to form a union and not just

associations, regardless of formal status. The associations for workers excluded from the

current labour law will be able to act as unions under the proposed Law on Unions of Enterprise.

Learning and Union-Management Partnership

The research conducted by Tony (2014) suggests that successful union-management learning

partnerships can also have an optimistic effect on handling conflict in those organisations with

the following practical implications. There are consequences for management in recognising the

"additional value" that through partnership learning initiatives with their unions brings in terms of

additionally ―both pre-empting and resolving individual and collective disputes in the workplace‖.

Stroud and Fairbrother (2008) explain that trade unions in the European Steel Industry attempt

to introduce workplace learning initiatives on different levels, in various ways and for a range of

International Journal of Economics, Commerce and Management, United Kingdom

Licensed under Creative Common Page 615

reasons, primarily through bargaining processes, partnership and forms of social dialogue.

There are of course doubts and concerns about the nature of this engagement. Based on

different range of possibilities, from the comprehensive "partnership" based provision in

Germany, to the reliance on voluntarism and learning-by-doing procedures evident elsewhere,

in practice the learning based on partnership relationships between union and management

remains limited. For unions to open up this domain of activity, they need to look to the broad

concerns and needs of their members, as well as looking to their own organisational structure

and policy objectives.

Some unions remain apprehensive towards social partnership initiatives, viewing them to

be an "emasculation of trade union purpose" and weakening employees' positions, and the

collective bargaining process is claimed by some to result in a distortion of learning processes

and opportunities so as to be almost meaningless (Rainbird, Sutherland, Edward, Holly &

Munro, 2000).

Engagement Culture and Union-Management Partnership

According to Macdonald (1997), the growing decentralization of IR caused by the requirement

for establishments to become more versatile, productive and competitive to face globalization

requirements means that authorities should delegate more responsibility and power to

supervisors and workers at the industry and enterprise level allow them to resolve problems in

their own workplace.

According to Sophal (2013), there are ongoing efforts in Cambodia to change the

regulatory framework with the view to smoothing labour relations. The main intention is to

introduce a rule of ―most representative union‖ so that ―collective bargaining‖ per factory would

be implemented.

According to Fletcher and Fang (2006), a vital component in successful partnering is the

need for executives to understand the effect of culture on the relationships they create along

with the networks they form. That is especially the situation with dealings in Asia as evidenced

by the increase in research during the last decade into the role of relationships and networks in

business activities in Asian countries. The reasons why networks have a tendency to be more

crucial in business activities in Asia are due to the following: greater political unrest in many

Asian countries; the dynamics of racial tensions; the lack of rule of law; and in some instances

the nature of the political system and its developments. The formation of networks of

relationships has been used as an approach to overcoming business risks due to the above

factors.

© Joseph & Seng

Licensed under Creative Common Page 616

Tu (2010) describes that different countries have different cultures, so there's a need to

comprehend the effects of cultures and international communications. Despite the zeal for

increased economic exchange, lots of people have found that cultural differences have

interfered with their capability to progressively conduct business because of the lack of

comprehension of the cultural differences. To overcome this, common organizational culture

can help with the coordination of an international partnership arrangement, and senior

managers need to possess knowledge of the national ethnic value characteristics of the people

concerned.

Due to cultural differences among workers, trade union leaders and management, which

also include language barriers, many strikes due occur. According to Sophal (2013), in most

factories, even lower level management is foreign rather than Cambodian, which is perceived to

contribute to poor communications. Frequent strikes are the least in part also attribute to poor

management. Reportedly, many factory managers have been unable to establish a

communication initiatives to tackle issues before they spill over into strikes.

The Proposed Conceptual Model

Based on the literature review and variables discussed above, the following analytical model

(Figure 3) will be tested to investigate the factors that promote enterprise level union-

management partnership in the garment industry of Cambodia.

Figure 3: Analytical Model: Factors Promoting Enterprise Level Union-Management Partnership

in the Garment Industry of Cambodia

Adopted from Joseph, S. (2015)

International Journal of Economics, Commerce and Management, United Kingdom

Licensed under Creative Common Page 617

CONCLUSION

The literature review in this chapter shows that partnership between union and management is

used in many countries around the world to improve union-management relations. Partnership

between union and management also has many other benefits besides improving working

relationships in organizations. This study looks at ways to instill partnership relationship

between the unions and management in enterprises in garment factories of Cambodia in order

to move away from the current adversary relationships between union and management. As

discussed in the earlier chapters, the pressures of competition in a market economy will

eventually impel and compel unions and management to cooperate with each other. Unions

should work for the well-being of their enterprise in the hope of safeguarding their members‘

jobs, incomes, and other benefits. Unions and management may accommodate each other‘s

demands when the going is good: if capacity to pay is not a constraint, persuasion is possible.

But in difficult times, unions find it difficult to cooperate with management because it usually

entails shedding some of the benefits and safeguards and making sacrifices through termination

of employees‘ contracts. Due to the power-dynamics in union-management relations, ―aspiring

together and achieving together‖ is not so common in Cambodia. As a means to achieve a win-

win position for both union and management, this study aims to emphasize the importance of

partnership as a strategy to foster beneficial union-management relations in garment factories of

Cambodia.

According to a Policy Brief by the Cambodian Center for Human Rights (Tola, 2014),

there is continued room for improvement in the garment industry and in the implementation of

the legal framework to adhere to human rights standards in commercial enterprises that would

result in economic growth, as stability in the private sector would likely increase and investment

in Cambodia would become attractive. One of the recommendations suggested to the garments

factories was to establish effective operational-level mechanisms for employees, either

individually or through unions, to bring grievances to the attention of their employers; these

mechanisms should be based on engagement and dialogue with the employees. The other

recommendation suggested to the unions was to improve communication and coordination

mechanism, so as to reduce redundant or contradictory complaints.

Schappe (1997), proposes partnership as a model that regards cooperative relationships

between union and management. He explains that the unions and management fundamental

traditional roles are changed so that both organizations become jointly responsible for running

of the organization and attending to the welfare of the employees by implementing various

mechanism of cooperation such as quality of work life groups, joint problem-solving groups, self-

managed work teams but most importantly leaders must have the right skills.

© Joseph & Seng

Licensed under Creative Common Page 618

REFERENCES

Ahmed, S., Raihan, M. Z., & Islam, N. (2013). Labor unrest in the ready-made garment industry of Bangladesh. International Journal of Business and Management, 8(15), 68-80. Retrieved April 30, 2015, from http://search.proquest.com/docview/1425863082?accountid=27932.

Allen, A. J., Yoerger, A. M., Lehmann-Willenbrock. N., & Jones, J. (2015). "Would you please stop that!: The relationship between counterproductive meeting behaviors, employee voice, and trust". Journal of Management Development, Vol. 34 Iss: 10, pp.1272 – 1287.

Appelbaum, E., & Hunter, W. L. (2004). Title Union Participation in Strategic Decisions of Corporation. RetrievedMay 15, 2015, fromhttp://www.nber.org/chapters/c9958 – Volume from national Bureau of Economic Research.

Arnold, D. (2013). Workers‘ agency and re-working power relations in Cambodia‘s Garment Industry.Maastricht University, the Netherlands. RetrievedMay 1, 2015, fromwww.capturingthegains.org/pdf/ctg-wp-2013-24.pdf

Asuyama, T., &Neou, S. (2012). How Has Cambodian Garment Industry Evolved? Institute of Developing Economies. RetrievedMay 25, 2015, from https://www.google.com/#q=Asuyama%2C+T.%2C+%26+Neou%2C+S.+(2012)+How+Has+Cambodian+Garment+Industry+Evolved%3F+

Babbie, E. (2002). The Basis of Social Research. USA, Wadsworth/Thomson Learning.

Badigannavar, V. (2009). Does labor−management partnership deliver mutual gains? Evidence from the UK public services, in David Lewin, Bruce E. Kaufman (ed.) Advances in Industrial & Labor Relations (Advances in Industrial & Labor Relations, Volume 16) Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

Barbash , J. (1989). John R. Commons: Pioneer in Labor Economics. Monthly Labor Review, p44-49.

Bennett, T. (2010). Employee voice initiatives in the public sector: Views from the workplace. The International Journal of Public Sector Management, 23(5), 444-455. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/09513551011058475.

Benson, J., & Brown, M. (2010). Employee voice: Does union membership matter? Human Resource Management Journal, 20: 80–99. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-8583.2009.00116.x.

Boone, N. H., & Boone, A.D. (2012). Analyzing Likert Data. Journal of Extention, Volume 50, Number 2, Tools of the Trade. Article# 2TOT2.

Boyce, C., & Neale, P. (2006). Conducting In-Depth Interview: A Guide for Designing and Conducting In-Depth Interviews for Evaluation Input. Pathfinder International Tool Series, Monitoring and Evaluation-2. Retrieved May 30, 2015, from http://www.pathfind.org/site/DocServer/m_e_tool_series_indepth_interviews.pdf?docID=6301.

Brandstetter, R., de Bruijn, H., Byrne, M., Deslauriers, H., Forschner, M., Machacova, J., Orologa, A., & Scopperra, A. (2006). ―Successful Partnership: A Guide‖. OECD LEED Forum on Partnerships and Local Governance ZSI (Centre for Social Innovation).

Bridgepan Group. (2009). Designing an Effective Organization Structure.RetrievedJune 22, 2015 fromhttp://www.bridgespan.org/getmedia/b1139597-adfe-4dd7-bbb2-ac8c67883020/effective-organizations_-structural-design.pdf.aspx.

Brown, W., &Oxenbridge, S. (2004). The development of co-operative employer/trade union relationships in Britain. IndustrielleBeziehungen, 11(1), 143-158. RetrievedMay 2, 2015, from http://search.proquest.com/docview/228362852?accountid=27932.

Brown, W., Peccei, R., & Huxley, K. (2008). Does partnership at work increase trust? An analysis based on the 2004 Workplace Employment Relations Survey. Industrial Relations Journal, 39: 124–152. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2338.2007.00481.x.

Bryson, A. (2005). Union effects on employee relations in Britain. Human Relations, 58(9), 1111-1139. RetrievedMay 29, 2015, from http://search.proquest.com/docview/231523489?accountid=27932.

International Journal of Economics, Commerce and Management, United Kingdom

Licensed under Creative Common Page 619

BT Plc. (2002). Partnership and Workplace Learning at BT. Education & Training, 44(7), 314-315. RetrievedJune 2, 2015, from http://search.proquest.com/docview/237067442?accountid=27932.

Buttigieg, D. M., Deery, S. J., & Iverson, R. D. (2014). Voice within trade unions? A test of the voice and loyalty hypothesis. Journal of Industrial Relations, 56(1), 3. doi:10.1177/0022185613498659.

Canvas (2015, July). Analysis of the Situation in Cambodia. RetrievedFebruary 2, 2016, from Canvasopedia.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/cambodia-analysis.pdf.

Cedric, E. D., & John W. F. (2005). "Decision of union workers to participate in employee involvement: an application of the theory of planned behaviour". Employee Relations, Vol. 27 Iss 5 pp. 511 -531. Retrieved May 30, 2015, fromhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1108/01425450510612031.

Chua Lee Chuan (2006). Sample Saiz Estimation Using Krejcie and Morgan and Cohen Statistical Power Analsis: A Comparison. JurnalPenyelidikan IPBL, Jilid 7.

Cooke, N. W. (1990). ―Factors influencing the effect of joint union-management programs on employee-supervisor relations‖. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, Vol.43, No. 5 pp.587-603.

Cooper, D., & Schindler, P. (2008). Business Research Methods. McGraw Hill International Edison, UK.

Creswell, W. J. (2009). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Method Approaches. Sage Publication, USA.

Curran, D., & Quinn, M. (2012). "Attitudes to employment law and the consequent impact of legislation on employment relations practice". Employee Relations, Vol. 34 Iss: 5, pp.464 – 480.

Daud, Z., &Tumin, S. (2013). The Relationship between Employees‘ Need and the Formation of Trade Union: The Malaysian Manufacturing Company‘s Experience International Journal of Business and Social Science Vol. 4 No. 13.

Dara, M. (2015, June 24). ―Trade Unions Agree on $177 Wage Demand‖. The Cambodia Daily. Retrieved June 20, 2015, from https://www.cambodiadaily.com/business/page/6/

David, S., &Kossov, I. (2016, June 8) ―Defend the factory‖. The Phnom Penh Post. Retrieved June 10, 2016, from http://www.phnompenhpost.com/national/defend-factory-pm-says

Dietz, G. (2004), ―Partnership and the development of trust in British workplaces‖. Human Resource Management Journal, Vol. 14 No. 1, pp. 5‐24.

Dietz, G., Cullen, J., & Coad, A. (2005) "Can there be non‐union forms of workplace partnership?". Employee Relations, Vol. 27 Iss: 3, pp.289 - 306.

Doherty, M. (2008). Hard law, soft edge? Information, consultation and partnership. Employee Relations, 30(6), 608-622. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/01425450810910019

Doug, G., & Gregg, N. (1999). Rethinking the Twenty-First Century Workplace: Unions and Workplace Democracy. Retrieved June 8, 2015, from http:/scholarship.law.upenn.edu

Drakopoulos, S., &Katselidis, I. (2014). The Development of Trade Union Theory and Mainstream Economic Methodology. Journal of Economic Issues (M.E. Sharpe Inc.), 48(4), 1133-1149.

Ear, S. (2013). Cambodia's Garment Industry: A case study in governance. Journal of Southeast Asian Economies, 30(1), 91-105. Retrieved June 10, 2016, from http://search.proquest.com/docview/1492269127?accountid=27932

Ethical Trading Initiative, (2010). Working with trade unions to improve working conditions:The benefits for retailers and suppliers. ETI member briefing. Retrieved June 6, 2015, from http://www.ethicaltrade.org/sites/default/files/resources/Benefits%20of%20working%20with%20trade%20unions.pdf

Evaluation and Data Development Strategic Policy Human Resources Development Canada (1998).Evaluation of Labour-Management Partnership Program (LMPP). Retrieved June 30, 2015, from http://publications.gc.ca/site/archiveearchived.html?url=http://publications.gc.ca/collections/collection_2013/rhdcc-hrsdc/RH64-114-1998-eng.pdf

© Joseph & Seng

Licensed under Creative Common Page 620

Finnerty, L. (2008). Creating management-union partnerships (Order No. MR37556). Available from ProQuest Central. (304812698). Retrieved May 15, 2015, from http://search.proquest.com/docview/304812698?accountid=27932

Fiorito, J. P. I., & Russell, Z. (2014). Union Beliefs and Activism: A Research Note. Journal of Labor Research, 35(4), 346-357.

FitzPatrick, L. (1998). "Trade unions — The forgotten internal communications tool?"Journal of Communication Management, Vol. 3 Iss: 2, pp.172 – 179

Fletcher, R., & Fang, T. (2006). "Assessing the impact of culture on relationship creation and network formation in emerging Asian markets". European Journal of Marketing, Vol. 40 Iss 3/4 pp. 430 – 446 Permanent link to this document:http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/03090560610648138

Fosh, P. (1997). "The future for Hong Kong trade unions: What can they learn from the British trade unions‘ experience of adversity 1979 to 1997?".Employee Relations, Vol. 19 Iss: 5, pp.466 – 495

Pattison, J., &Kline, T. (2015). "Facilitating a just and trusting culture". International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance, Vol. 28 Iss: 1, pp.11 – 26.

Fujimura, H. (2012). ―Japan‘s Labor Unions, Past, Present and Future‖. Japan Labor Review 9(1) 6-24.

Gandz, J. (2009). Compelling Visions: Content, Context, Credibility and Collaboration. Ivey Business Journal Online, 73(2), 1. Retrieved June 15, 2015, from http://search.proquest.com/docview/216195601?accountid=27932

Geary, J. (2008). Do Unions Benefit from Working in Partnership with Employers? Evidence from Ireland. Industrial Relations. Journal of Economy and Society, 47: 530–568. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-232X.2008.00534.x

Gennard, J. & Judge, G. (2005). Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development: ISBN 1843980630. Retrieved May 11, 2015, from https://books.google.com.my/books?id=FuUmIixUldwC&pg=PA227&lpg=PA227&dq=trade+unionmanagement+relationships+and+partnerships&source=bl&ots=Hb_Mbgkht1&sig=wd3_SZEKVwyF2uWntfNBgghW1G8&hl=en&sa=X&ei=rrViVaGJD8vIuAT09ILgAw&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=trade%20union-management%20relationships%20and%20partnerships&f=false

Gill, C., & Meyer, D. (2013). "Union presence, employee relations and high performance work practices". Personnel Review, Vol. 42 Issue 5 pp. 508 – 528.

Gillespie, N., & Dietz, G. (2009). ―Trust Repair after an Organizational- Level Failure. Academy of Management Review 34(1), 127-145.

Gillespie, N & Dietz, G. (2012). ―The Recovery of Trust: Case studies of Organizational Failures and Trust Repair‖. Institute of Business Ethics.

Gitlow, A. L., &Gitlow, H. S. (2013). Unionism, Job Security, and Quality of Output: A Dilemma? Labor Law Journal, 64(1), 33-42. Retrieved June 7, 2015, from http://search.proquest.com/docview/1321128212?accountid=27932

Grant, A., & Clarkson, J. (2001). Developing co-operative union-management relationships: A partnership approach to conflict.Canadian HR Reporter, 14(9), 10-10,12. Retrieved June 11, 2015, from http://search.proquest.com/docview/220811578?accountid=27932

Guest, D.E., &Peccei, R. (2001). ―Partnership at work: mutuality and the balance of advantage‖. British

Journal of Industrial Relations, Vol. 39 No. 2, pp. 207‐36. [CrossRef], [ISI] [Infotrieve].

Hair, F. J. Fr., Celsi, M., Money, A., Samuel, P., Page, M. (2014). Essentials of Business Research Methods. Routledge, Taylor and Francis, London.

Haley, D. L. (2005). What factors are experienced as drivers and/or resistors to promote change towards collaborative union/management relations: Participatory intervention? Retrieved May 16, 2015, from http://search.proquest.com/docview/305350195?accountid=27932http://search.proquest.com/docview/305350195?accountid=27932

International Journal of Economics, Commerce and Management, United Kingdom

Licensed under Creative Common Page 621

Harley, B., Hyman, J. &Thompson, P. (2005). Participation and Democracy at Work. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, pp. 20-37.

Haynes, P., & Allen, M. (2001). Partnership as union strategy: A preliminary evaluation.Employee Relations, 23(2), 164-187. Retrieved May 28, 2015, from http://search.proquest.com/docview/235181589?accountid=27932

Holland, P., Cooper, B. K., Pyman, A., &Teicher, J. (2012). Trust in management: the role of employee voice arrangements and perceived managerial opposition to unions. Human Resource Management Journal, 22: 377–391. doi: 10.1111/1748-8583.12002

Holloway, I.(1997). Basic Concepts for Quatitative Research, Blackwell Science.

Imai, J. (2011). The transformation of Japanese Employment Relations – Reform without labour. Palgrave, Macmillan, UK.

Industrial Relations Adversarial Approach Pits Organization Against Employees‘ Rights (n.d.). Retrieved June 16, 2015, from http://www.strategic-human-resource.com/industrial-relations-adversarial-approach.html

Jeff, H., & Cunningham, I. (1996). "Change in Employee Relations — Can Linem Managers Deliver?" Management Research News, Vol. 19 Iss 4/5 pp. 35 – 37 Permanent link to this document: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/eb028455

Johnstone, S., Wilkinson, A., &Ackers, P. (2004). Partnership paradoxes: A case study of an energy company. Employee Relations, 26(4), 353-376.

Joyner, F. F. (2015). Bridging the knowing/Doing gap to create high engagement work cultures.Journal of Applied Business Research, 31(3), 1131-n/a. Retrieved June 2, 2016, from http://search.proquest.com/docview/1699068637?accountid=27932

Kalowski, A. (2015).Structure determining factors of business organization.International Journal of Innovation, Management and Technology, 6(3), 206-212. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.7763/IJIMT.2015.V6.603

Kiss, I. (2007). Ljudskifaktor – najvažniji element organizacijske structure. Ekonomija/Economics, 13(2), pp. 379-392. Retrieved May 16, 2015, from https://www.efst.hr/management/Vol18No1-2013/6-Spaho.pdf.

Kochan, T. A., &Osterman, P. (1994). The Mutual Gains Enterprise. Harvard Business School Press, Boston.

Kochan, T. A. (2008). "The potential and precariousness of partnership: the case of the Kaiser Permanente labor management partnership". Human Resource Management International Digest, Vol. 16 Issue: 5

Krejcie, R., V. & Morgan, D. W (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. EducPsychol Meas.

Kumar, K. P., &Babu, S. S. (2015). Social engagement synergy of unionized employees with enterprise objectives: An emerging paradigm in industrial relations.IUP Journal of Management Research, 14(2), 52-67. Retrieved June 15, 2016, from http://search.proquest.com/docview/1697672510?accountid=27932

Larson, S., &Nissed B. (1987). Theories of the Labor Movement, Wayne State University Press, Detroit.

Lee, D., Huh, Y., &Reigeluth, C. M. (2015). Collaboration, intragroup conflict, and social skills in project-based learning.Instructional Science, 43(5), 561-590. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11251-015-9348-7

Lyon-C. V. (2013). Professionals, Artists, and Unions: Agents of Class Transformation. Rethinking Marxism, 25:1, 100-103, DOI: 10.1080/08935696.2012.741774

Macdonald, D. (1997). Challengers for Employers and Their Organization. International Labor Organization ACT/EMP publications – Industrial Relation. Retrieved May 10, 2015, from https://www.google.com/#q=International+Labour+Organization+ACT%2FEMP+Publications+(ELEMENTS+OF+A+SOUND+INDUSTRIAL+RELAMacdonald%2C+D.+(1997).++Challengers+for+Employers+and+Their+Organization+

© Joseph & Seng

Licensed under Creative Common Page 622

Mathis, L., R. & Jackson, H., J. (2006). Human Resource Management. USA: Southwestern College Publishing.

Marchington, M. (2005), ―Employee involvement: patterns and explanations‖, in Harley, B., Hyman, J. and Thompson, P. (Eds), Participation and Democracy at Work, Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, pp. 20-37.

Martinez, L. M., & and Stuart, M. (2004), ―Swimming Against the Tide: Social Partnership, Mutual Gains and the Revival of ‗Tired‘ HRM‖. International Journal of Human Resource Management, Vol. 15 No. 2,

pp. 410‐24. [CrossRef], [ISI] [Infotrieve]

Mc. Andrew, I. (2006). ―Employers, Unions and Workplace Partnership in New Zealand‖. Department of Management, University of Otago, Dunedin.

McGuire, F., & McGuire, D., & Sanderson, M. (2013). Exploring line manager relationships with trade unions and the HR function. Strategic HR Review, 12(6), 332-334. Retrieved May 10, 2015, from http://search.proquest.com/docview/1461357146?accountid=27932

McKeena, E and Beech, N. (2002). Human Resource Management – A Concise Analysis. Harlow, England, Prentice Hall.p58.

Miguel, M. L., &Stuart, M. (2002). "Assessing the principles of partnership: Workplace trade union representatives‘ attitudes and experiences". Employee Relations, Vol. 24 Iss: 3, pp.305 – 320

Milinski, M. S. (1998). Obstacles to sustaining a labor-management partnership: A management perspective.Public Personnel Management, 27(1), 11-21. Retrieved May 12, 2015, from http://search.proquest.com/docview/215930196?accountid=27932

Mom, K., & Sean. T. (2014, May 29): ILO attacks trade union law. The Phnom Penh Post. Retrieved May 30, 2015 from http://www.phnompenhpost.com/national/ilo-attacks-trade-union-law

Mulder, C. P. (2006). Unions and the strategy of class transformation: The case of the broadway musicians (Order No. 3216957). Available from ABI/INFORM Complete; ProQuest Central. (305306599). Retrieved May 13, 2015, from http://search.proquest.com/docview/305306599?accountid=27932

Napathorn, C. (2011). What Types of Factors Can Influence the Strength of Labor Unions in Companies and State Enterprises in Thailand? International Journal of Business and Management Vol. 6, No. 2.112 ISSN 1833-3850 E-ISSN 1833-8119

Natsuda, K., Goto, K., &Thoburn. J. (2009). Challenges to the Cambodian Garment Industry in the Global Garment Value Chain. RCAPS Working Paper No.09.3.

Neil, A., & Robinson, J. (2012). Making a Union/Management Partnership Really Work. Kai Tiaki : Nursing New Zealand, 17(11), 32-3. Retrieved May 10, 2015, from http://search.proquest.com/docview/963358595?accountid=27932

Nowak, P. (2015). "The past and future of trade unionism". Employee Relations, Vol. 37 Iss 6 pp.683 – 691. Permanent link to this document: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/ER-04-2015-0064

Nuan, V., & Serrano, M. (2010). Building Unions in Cambodia. History, Challenges, Strategies. Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung, Singapore.

Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd

ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

OSN Academy (n.d.). Chapter 1: Trade Union. Retrieved May June 1, 2015, from www.osnacademy.com/contentImage/211409574341Trade%20Unions.pdf

Michael, F. (2006). ―Successful Partnerships – A. Guide‖. OECD LEED Forum on Partnerships and Local Governance. Retrieved May 10, 2015, from https://www.google.com/#q=OECD+LEED+forum+2006

Ozley, L. M. (1998). Rethinking the management labour relationship. RetrievedApril 30, 2015, from http://www.leeozley.com/labor.htm

Pannucci, C. J., & Wilkins, E.G. (2010) Identifying and avoiding bias in research‖. Plastic and reconstructive surgery, 126(2), 619.

Peter, Z. (2014, July 31). Unions Want Arbitration Council Deal Renewed. The Cambodia Daily. Retrieved May 21, 2015, from http://www.opendevelopmentcambodia.net/tag/free-trade-union/

International Journal of Economics, Commerce and Management, United Kingdom

Licensed under Creative Common Page 623

Policy Brief (2014): The Garment Industry in Cambodia: ―Workers Rights are Human rights‖. Cambodia Center for Human Rights. Retrieved January 10, 2016, from https://www.google.com/#q=Policy+Brief+by+the+Cambodian+Center+for+Human+Rights+(2014)

Poole, M., Lansburry, R., &Wailes, N. (2001). A Comparative Analysis of Developments in Industrial Democracy. Industrial Relations. A Journal of Economy and Society: Volume 40, Issue 3, pages 490–525.

Pride W. M., Hughes, J. R., Kapoor, R. J.(2013).―Business‖. 12th Edition, South Western Cengage

learning, USA, page 308-309

Pyman, A., Holland, P., Teicher, J., & Cooper, B. K. (2010). Industrial Relations Climate, Employee Voice and Managerial Attitudes to Unions: An Australian Study. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 48: 460–480. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8543.2009.00772.x

Radhakrishna, B. R. (2007). Tips for Developing and Testing Questionnaire/Instrument. Journal of Extension, Volume 45, Number 1, Tools of the Trade, 1TOT2.

Rainbird, H., Sutherland, J., Edwards, P., Holly, L., & Munro, A. (2003). ―Employee Voice and Training at Work. An Analysis of Case Study and WERS 98. London: Department of Trade and Industry.

Ramesh, V. M., &Sakthivel, R. (2013). Effectiveness of communication in human resource management. Journal of Contemporary Research in Management, 8(3), 13-24. Retrieved December 28, 2015, from http://search.proquest.com/docview/1503317626?accountid=27932

pp.75 – 108

Ratnam, V.C.S. (2006). ―Industrial Relations‖, Oxford University Press, India.

Reina, D., & Reina, M. (2010). Rebuilding Trust in the Workplace. B-K Publishers Inc. California.

Rittau, Y., &Dundon, T. (2010). The roles and functions of shop stewards in workplace partnership. Employee Relations, 32(1), 10-27. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/01425451011002734

Robinson, R. J., & Friedman, A. R. (1995). "Mistrust and Misconstrued in Union-Management Relationships: Causal Accounts in Adversarial Contents‖. International Journal of Conflict Management, Vol. 6 Iss: 3, pp.312 – 327

Roche, W.K., & Geary, J. F. (2006). Partnership at Work: The Quest for Radical Organizational Change, Routledge, London.

Sabina Siebert, (2011). "Are trade unions learning?" Higher Education, Skills and Work-Based Learning, Vol. 1 Iss: 2, pp.91 – 94

Saporta, I., & Lincoln, B. (1995). Managers' and workers' attitudes toward unions in the U.S. and Canada.Relations Industrielles, 50(3), 550-566. Retrieved April, 30, 2015, from http://search.proquest.com/docview/224290732?accountid=27932

Schappe, H. R. (1997). "Union ‐ Management Cooperation: Different Relationships, Different Forms". American Journal of Business, Vol. 12 Iss: 2, pp.39 – 46

Schurman, J. S., & Eaton, E. A. (2013). ―Trade Unions Organizing Workers Informalised from Above: Case Studies from Cambodia, Colombia, South Africa, and Tunisia‖. Report to the Solidarity Center, Rutgers University

Schuster, M.H. (1984). Union-Management Cooperation: Structure, Process, and Impact. Kalamazoo, MI: W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research.

Schuster, M. H., & Weidman, S. (2006). Organizational change in union settings: Labor-management partnerships: The past and the future.HR.Human Resource Planning, 29(1), 45-51. Retrieved April 30, 2015, fromhttp://search.proquest.com/docview/224379772?accountid=27932

Sekaran, U. (2006). Research methods for business: A skill-building approach. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

Serrat, O. (2009). Building Trust in the Workplace. © Asian Development Bank. Retrieved June 12, 2015, from https://think-asia.org/handle/11540/2763

© Joseph & Seng

Licensed under Creative Common Page 624

Sheehan, C., De Cieri, H., Cooper, B., & Shea, T. (2016). "Strategic implications of HR role management in a dynamic environment". Personnel Review, Vol. 45 Iss: 2, pp.353 – 373

Silva, R.S. (n.d.). Elements of a Sound Industrial Relations System. International Labour Organization ACT/EMP Publications. Retrieved June 10, 2015, fromhttps://www.google.com/#q=International+Labour+Organization+ACT/EMP+Publications+(ELEMENTS+OF+A+SOUND+INDUSTRIAL+RELATIONS+SYSTEM)+by+S.R.+de+Silva+(Theory+Mc.+Gregor,+F.+Tailor,+Hawthose+(Book)

Sirianni, C. (1987). Work Participation and the Politics of Reform. Temple University Press.

Soon, S. K. (2014). Does labor–management partnership deprive union members of activism toward their unions? Evidence from union members in Korea. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 25:11, 1613-1630, DOI:10.1080/09585192.2013.84172

Sophal, C. (2011).Historical Development of Minimum Wage in the Cambodia Garment Industry. Retrieved June 10, 2015, fromhttp://nokorkhmer.blogspot.my/2011/08/historical-development-of-minimum-wage_15.html

Sophal, E. (2013). Cambodia‘s Garment Industry: A Case Study in Governance. Journal of Southeast Asian Economies Vol. 30, No. 1 (2013), pp. 91–105DOI: 10.1355/ae30-1f

Sparrow, J. (2013). "The five key roles of managers: how HR can build engagement that lasts". Strategic HR Review, Vol. 12 Iss: 2.

Stroud, D., &Fairbrother, P. (2008). Workplace learning: A trade union failure to service needs. Journal of Workplace Learning, 20(1), 6-20. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/13665620810843610

Suwarno, S.,&Abtoyo, W.K. (2012). Partnership at Work. A Case Study of Indonesia. ILERA World Congress, Philadelphia, USA.

Teague, P. (2004), ―Social partnership and the enterprise: Some lessons from the Irish experience‖. European Political Economy Review, Vol.2 No. 1, pp. 6-35.

Tola, M. (2014). ―Cambodia‘s Draft Law on Union of Enterprise- Legal Analysis‖ Cambodia. Retrieved May 30, 2015, fromhttp://www.licadhocambodia.org/reports.php?perm=199

Tony, B. (2014). "Do union-management learning partnerships reduce workplace conflict?". Employee Relations, Vol. 36 Iss: 1, pp.17 – 32.

Tony, D. (2002). Department of Management. National University of Ireland. GalwayIndustrial Relations Journal, Vol 33 (3): pp.234-24544.

Totterdill, P., & Exton, R. (2014). "The impact of workplace partnership: Becton Dickinson". Strategic Direction, Vol. 30 Iss: 9, pp.20 – 21

Tschida, T. J. (2006). Unions and Management: A Blissful Marriage? How call centersare creating models for win-win relationships. BUSINESS JOURNAL Retrieved May 30, 2015, from http://www.gallup.com/businessjournal/21727/unions-management-blissful-marriage.aspx?version=print

Tu, J. (2010). An empirical study of cultural comparisons on Asian four little dragons. Interdisciplinary Journal of Contemporary Research in Business, 2(5), 189-206. Retrieved June 2, 2015, from http://search.proquest.com/docview/815310298?accountid=27932

UNESCO (n.d.). Culture for Development Indicators in Cambodia (CDIS), Cambodia Brief Cambodia (2012-2013). Retrieved May 28, 2016, fromhttp://www.unesco.org/new/en/culture/themes/cultural-diversity/cultural-expressions/programmes/culture-for-development-indicators/

Upchurch, M., Danford, A., Tailby, S., & Richardson, M. (2008). The Realities of Partnership at Work. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke.

Videla, N. P. (2006). It cuts both ways: Workers, management and the construction of a "community of fate" on the shop floor in a Mexican garment factory. Social Forces, 84(4), 2099-2120. Retrieved April 27, 2015, from http://search.proquest.com/docview/229912290?accountid=27932

International Journal of Economics, Commerce and Management, United Kingdom

Licensed under Creative Common Page 625

Willman, P. (1998). Managing the unions: The impact of legislation on trade unions' behaviour. Industrial & Labor Relations Review, 51(2), 324-325. Retrieved May 30, 2015, from http://search.proquest.com/docview/236367711?accountid=27932

Wilson Learning Worldwide Inc. (n.d.) Employee Engagement: The leader‘s role. Edina, MN: Wilson Learning Worldwide Inc.

Wilton, N. (2010). Introduction to Human Resource Management, Sage Publication Ltd, London.

Wong, S. E. (2000). Partnership of trade unions in national development programmes and in promotion of labour mobility in Singapore, Singapore NTUC.

Wu, C., & Liu, C. (2010). Do trade unions deteriorate international competitiveness? Reconciliation of the discrepancy between theory and practice.Atlantic Economic Journal, (2). 145.

Yarrington, L., Townsend, K., & Brown, K. (2007). Models of Engagement: Union Management Relations for the 21st Century. (2007). Retrieved May 30, 2015, from http://eprints.qut.edu.au/9121/1/ Models_of_Engagement.pdf

Young, P., Moule, P., Evans, D., Simmons, S., Crack, M., & Mayo, G. (2012). Learning together, working together: An evaluation of experiences of a pilot programme for partnership between unions and management in the health service. Nurse Education Today, 32501-505. doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2011.07.009