1
Factors Associated with Persistent Neurocognitive Impairment Despite Long-term HAART in Patients with HIV-Dementia V Tozzi, P Balestra, MF Salvatori, C Vlassi, A Corpolongo, R Bellagamba, P Lorenzini, S Galgani, M Zaccarelli, G Liuzzi, L Giancola, U Visco-Comandini, E Boumis, A Antinori, P Narciso. National Institute for Infectious Diseases "L. Spallanzani", Via Portuense 292, 00149 Rome, Italy. *Contact e-mail: [email protected] Background The optimal treatment for HIV-D has not been established, but there are strong evidences that the highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) is effective in treating the neurocognitive impairment (NCI). However, although potent antiretroviral treatment can reverse HIV-D, the benefits vary substantially between individuals. In the era of HAART, the course of HIV-D has changed, and several distinct patters of evolution of cognitive functions have been proposed. Although these patterns have not been fully characterized, they include: 1) improvement of cognitive functions with full reversal of the cognitive deficit (“reversible NCI”), 2a) initial improvement after the initiation of HAART but with significant persistent neurological deficit, or 2b) slow continued decline in neurocognitive functions with or without effective peripheral virological control (“persistent NCI”). Thus, although HAART improves NCI, predictors of reversible NCI are unknown. Therefore, we have conducted a prospective observational study to examine the clinical course of HIV associated NCI in patients with HIV-D treated with HAART. Aims To describe prevalence of persistent neurocognitive impairment despite long-term HAART in patients with HIV-D. To assess and risk factors for persistent neurocognitive impairment despite long-term HAART in patients with HIV-D. Methods Design. Prospective observational study. Setting. National Institute for Infectious Diseases, L Spallanzani, Rome, Italy. Patients. All patients with HIV-related NCI (as defined below) seen in our Institute since 1995. Exclusion criteria. Opportunistic infections or tumors of the CNS, any confounding neurological illness, major neurological or psychiatric disorders, current drug abuse, use of sedative- hypnotics. Neuropsychological testing. A battery of 17 standardized tests sensitive to a wide spectrum of different cognitive domains. Administered by one of us (P.B.). Requiring approximately 90 minutes to complete. Neuropsychological (NP) testing z-scores. The NPl scores from each test was transformed into a z-scores using a reference population. Each z-score was adjusted so that negative values indicated below-average performance. Summary global NPZ8 and NPZ4 scores were also ogtained. Neurological diagnosis. HIV-related neurocognitive impairment (NCI) was defined as performing below one standard deviation for the normative mean on at least two NP tests or two standard deviations below the mean on at least one test. The diagnosis of NCI also required the exclusion of other conditions that could explain the finding. HAART regimens. As best judged by the treating physician. Criteria for the diagnosis of either reversible or persistent neurocognitive impairment (NCI). According to the results of serial NP assessments, patients were considered having either reversible or persistent NCI. End points. Neuropsychological test results. Statistics. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate the probability of reversible neurocognitive impairment over time. The association between reversible NCI and selected characteristics was assessed by means of the chi-square test, or, when appropriate, by means of the student’s t-test. A multivariable analysis using a multiple logistic regression model was performed in order to assess statistically significant associations between reversible neurocognitive impairment and main demographic (age, gender, years of education), clinical (HIV disease stage at enrollment, virological response to HAART, antiretroviral treatment, exposure to CSF penetrating drugs), laboratory (CD4 cell count at enrollment and during follow-up, plasma HIV RNA at enrollment and during follow-up), and neuropsychological (NPZ4 and NPZ8 scores at enrollment and follow-up) variables. Moreover, a multiple logistic regression was also used to assess the probability of reversible neurocognitive impairment adjusted by the same variables. Abstract E-119 Concentration and Speed ofM ental Processing Trail M akingA W AIS-R Digit Span(forward) W AIS-R Digit Span(backward) W AIS-R Digit Symbol StroopW ordand Colour Corsi Cubetest M ental Flexibility Trail M aking B StroopColour-W ord StroopColour-W ord ControlledOral W ord M em ory ReyAuditoryVerbal Learning ReyAuditoryVerbal Learningafter15’ ReyComplexFigure, delayed FiguraComplessadi Rey, ritardata Babcock StoryRecall, im mediate BabcockStoryRecall, delayed FineM otorFunctioning LafayetteGroovedPegboard, dominant LafayetteGroovedPegboard, nondomin. Visuospatial and Constructional ReyComplexFigure, copy Neuropsychological test battery, bycognitive dom ain Factors associated with reversible neurocognitive impairment (NCI) Reversible NCI All patients No Yes p (n=116) (n=81) (n=35) Age in years, mean (±SD) 41.5 (8.4) 40.7 (8.0) 43.4 (9.0) .110 Education in years, mean (±SD) 10.8 (3.9) 10.1 (3.6) 12.4 (4.4) .004 Gender, n. (%) female 21 (18.1) 20 (24.7) 2 (5.7) .017 Months of follow-up, mean (±SD) 36.2 (27.7) 35.6 (26.7) 37.6 (30.0) .725 HIV transmission modality, n. (%): - Intravenous drug use 47 (40.2) 37 (45.7) 10 (28.6) - MSM 27 (23.1) 17 (20.9) 10 (28.6) .408 - Heterosexuality 40 (35.0) 25 (30.9) 15 (42.3) - unknown 2 (1.7) 2 (2.5) 0 HIV clinical stage, n. (%): - CDC group A or B 56 (48.7) 35 (43.2) 21 (60.0) .148 - CDC group C 60 (51.3) 46 (56.8) 14 (40.0) Positive HCV serology, n. (%) 56 (47.) 44 (54.3) 12 (34.3) .231 Baseline CD4 cell/l, mean (±SD) 259 (±224) 268 (±228) 238 (±219).514 Nadir CD4 cell/l, mean (±SD) 153 (±137) 142 (±116) 178 (±174).205 Bas viral load log cp/ml, mean (±SD) 3.93 (±1.4) 3.8 (±1.5) 4.3 (±1.3).097 Virological suppression (<50 cpml) 66 (60) 49 (62.8) 17 (53.1) .346 during HAART n.(%) NPZ4 score, mean (±SD)at baseline -2.42 (±2.5) -2.8 (± 2.7) -1.8 (± 2.1) .078 NPZ8 score (±SD) at baseline -1.97 (±1.6) -2.3 (±1.6) - 1.5 (±1.3).026 Delta NPZ4 score, mean (±SD) 0.86 (±1.8) 0.61(±1.8)1.24 (±1.9) .178 (first follow-up vs baseline) Delta NPZ8 score, mean (±SD) 0.45 (±1.3) 0.18 (±1.2) 0.84 (±1.3) .044 (first follow-up vs baseline) “Neuroactive HAART”, %* (±SD) 57.4 (±49.2) 59.9 (±54.0) 51.7(±44.5) .369 * % of months of treatment with 2-3 neuroactive drugs (d4T, AZT, ABC, EFV, NVP, IDV) containing HAART Factors associated with reversible NCI in the 116 impaired HIV-positive patients. Results of the logistic regression model Univariate analysis Multivariate analysis Factor OR 95% CI p OR 95% CI p Sex Female 1.00 Male 5.41 1.19-24.58 .029 3.62 0.51-25.5 .196 Education 1.15 1.15-1.04 .006 1.17 0.98-1.38 .070 (for 1 degree increase) CD4 at last visit 1.00 0.99-1.00 .128 1.00 0.99-1.00 .241 (for 1 degree increase) Baseline NPZ8 score 1.63 1.02-2.59 .037 5.53 2.03-5.06 .001 (for 1 degree increase) Delta NPZ8 visit 0-1 1.56 0.99-2.46 .055 6.94 2.39-20.09 <.001 (for 1 degree increase) N europsychologicaltesting: criteria forinterpretation Scores are adjusted forgender,age,education and com pared to population based norm s. C riteria forim pairm ent:>1 SD below the norm ative m ean on tw o tests or> 2 SD below the norm ative m ean on one test. Im paired patients:evaluation ofotherconditions thatcould explain the finding (clinical,laboratory, neuroim aging). C linicalevaluation offunctionalim pairm ent. D iagnostic criteria for H IV-D :im pairm entm eeting or notm eeting H IV -D criteria. 1 Baseline characteristics in the 116 study patients, by HAART exposure All patients naive experienced p (n=116) (n=68) (n=48) Clinical Age in years, mean (±SD) 41.5 (±8.4) 40.4 (±8.8) 43.1 (±7.4) .096 Education in years, mean (±SD) 10.9 (±4.0) 10.7 (±4.3) 10.9 (±3.6) .079 Gender, n. (%) male 94 (81.0) 56 (82.3) 38 (79.2) .666 HIV transmission modality, n. (%): - Intravenous drug use 47 (40.5) 27 (39.7) 20 (41.7) - MSM 27 (23.3) 22 (32.3) 5 (10.4) .030 - Heterosexuality 40 (34.4) 18 (26.4) 22 (45.8) - Other / unknown 2 (1.7) 1 (1.5 ) 1 (2.1) HIV clinical stage, n. (%): - CDC group A or B 56 (48.3) 38 (55.9) 18 (37.5) .051 - CDC group C 60 (51.7) 30 (44.1) 30(62.5) Positive HCV serology, n. (%) 56 (47.9) 30 (44.1) 26 (53.0) .244 CD4 cell count/l, mean (±SD) 259 (±224) 194 (±167) 350.8 (±259) <.001 HIV RNA, log cp/ml, mean (±SD), 3.9 (±1.4) 4.6 (±1.1) 3.1 (±1.4) <.001 Months of HIV infect., mean (±SD) 75.5 (±62.1) 58.1 (±56.1) 99.4 (±62.7) <.001 Neuropsychological Test Battery ° Global NPZ4 score* (±SD) -2.4 (±2.5) - 2.1 (±1.6) -2.9 (±3.3) .128 Global NPZ8 score* (±SD) -2.0 (±1.6) -1.7 (±1.2) -2.3 (±1.9) .100 Trail Making A (±SD) -3.5 (±5.3) -3.1 (±3.7) -3.9 (±6.9) .410 WAIS-R Digit Span (forward) *(±SD) -0.76 (±1.2) -0.71 (±1.1) -0.83 (±1.3) .656 WAIS-R Digit Span (back.) *(±SD) -1.22 (±1.2) -1.3 (±1.0) -1.11 (±1.3) .436 WAIS-R Digit Symbol * (±SD) -1.49 (±1.0) -1.47 (±0.9) -1.5 (±1.1) .848 Stroop Word and Colour * (±SD) -1.05 (±2.1) -0.88 (±1.6) -1.3 (±2.5) .300 Corsi Cube test * (±SD) -1.08 (±1.4) - 1.11 (±1.2) -1.03 (±1.7) .757 Trail Making B * (±SD) -4.05 (±4.2) -3.7 (±3.6) -4.46 (±4.9) .395 Stroop Colour-Word *(±SD) -2.04 (±2.3) -1.85 (±2.0) -2.29 (±2.7) .373 Controlled Oral Word *(±SD) -1.40 (±1.8) -1.21 (±1.2) -1.67 (±2.4) .283 Rey Auditory Verbal Learning * (±SD) -1.91 (±1.4) -1.70 (±1.3) -2.18 (±1.4) 078 Rey Audit. Verb. Learn. at 15’ * (±SD) -2.26 (±1.6) - 1.98 (±1.6) -2.61 (±1.5) .049 Rey Complex Figure (delayed)* (±SD) -1.52 (±1.4) -1.40 (±1.4) -1.65 (±1.4) .469 L. Grooved (dominant hand) * (±SD) -2.3 (±3.3) -2.17 (±3.2) -2.47 (±3.4) .648 L. Grooved (non dom. hand) * (±SD) -2.13 (±4.1) -2.01 (±3.1) -2.3 (±5.3) .722 Rey Complex Figure (copy)* (±SD) -0.76 (±1.6) -0.70 (±1.6) -0.81 (±1.6) .817 ° All neuropsychological test battery results are given as normalized z-scores p student’s t-test * greater negative z-scores reflect greater neurocognitive impairment D e lta c h a n g e s fro m b a s e lin e in N P Z 4 * a n d N P Z 8 ** s c o re s in 6 8 HAART n a iv e c o g n itiv e ly im p a ire d p a tie n ts , b y m o n th o f H AART. * T ra il M a k in g A , T ra il M a k in g B , L a fa y e tte G ro o v e d P e g b o a rd d o m in a n t h a n d , W AIS-R D ig itS ym bol ** T ra il M a k in g A , T ra il M a k in g B , L a fa y e tte G ro o v e d P e g b o a rd d o m in a n t h a n d , L a fa ye tte G ro o v e d P e g b o a rd n o n d o m in a n t h a n d , W A IS -R D ig it S p a n (b a c k w a rd ), W AIS-R D ig itS y m b o l, R e y A u d ito ry V e rb a l L e a rn in g T e s t, R e y A u d ito ry V e rb a l L e a rn in g a fte r 1 5’ 0 0,2 0,4 0,6 0,8 1 1,2 1,4 6 m onths (n=31) 12 m onths (n=47) 18 m onths (n=36) 24 m onths (n = 3 4 ) 36 m onths (n=37) 48 m o n th s (n=29) >48 m onths (n=31) N P Z 4 score N P Z 8 score * p <.05 ** p <.01 c o m p a re d to b a s e lin e (p a ire d t te st) * * * ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** * D e lta c h a n g e s fro m b a s e lin e in n e u ro p s y c h o lo g ic a l te sts exp lo rin g c o n c e n tra tio n a n d s p e e d o f m e n ta l p ro c e s s in g in 6 8 H A A R T naive c o g n itiv e ly im p a ire d p a tie n ts , b y m o n th o f H AART. -1 -0,5 0 0,5 1 1,5 2 2,5 6 m onths (n=31) 12 m onths (n=47) 18 m onths (n=36) 24 m onths (n=34) 36 m onths (n=37) 48 m onths (n = 29 ) >48 m onths (n = 3 1) T ra il M a k in g A D ig it S p a n (forw ard) D ig it S p a n (b a c k w a rd ) D ig it S ym bol S tro op W o rd C olour * p <.05 ** p <.01 co m p a re d to b a se lin e (p a ire d t te st) ** * * * * * * * * D e lta c h a n g e s fro m b a s e lin e in n e u ro p s y c h o lo g ic a l te sts exp lo rin g m e n ta l fle x ib ility in 6 8 H A A R T n a iv e c o g n itiv e ly im p a ire d p a tie n ts , b y m o n th o f H AART. 0 0,5 1 1,5 2 2,5 3 6 m onths (n=31) 12 m onths (n=47) 18 m onths (n=36) 24 m onths (n=34) 36 m onths (n=37) 48 m onths (n = 29 ) >48 m onths (n=31) T ra il M a k in g B S tro op C olour-W ord C o n tr o lled O ra l W ord * p <.05 ** p <.01 co m p a re d to b a se lin e (p a ire d t te st) * * * ** ** * * * ** ** ** ** ** ** * * D e lta c h a n g e s fro m b a s e lin e in n e u ro p s y c h o lo g ic a l te s ts exp lo rin g m e m o ry in 6 8 H A A R T n a iv e c o g n itiv e ly im p a ire d p a tie n ts , b y m o n th of HAART. -0,5 0 0,5 1 1,5 2 6 m onths (n=31) 12 m onths (n=47) 18 m onths (n=36) 24 m onths (n=34) 36 m onths (n=37) 48 m onths (n=29) >48 m onths (n=31) R ey A VL R ey A V L a fte r 1 5' R ey C om p lex F ig u re * p <.05 ** p <.01 co m p a re d to b a s e lin e (p a ire d t te st) * * * * * * ** D e lta c h a n g e s fro m b a s e lin e in n e u ro p s y c h o lo g ic a l te s ts exp lo rin g fine m o to r fu n c tio n in g in 6 8 H A A R T n a iv e c o g n itiv e ly im p a ire d p a tie n ts , b y m o n th o f H AART. 0 0,5 1 1,5 2 2,5 6 m onths (n = 31) 12 m onths (n = 4 7 ) 18 m onths (n = 3 6 ) 24 m onths (n = 34 ) 36 m onths (n = 37 ) 48 m onths (n = 2 9) >48 m onths (n = 3 1) L G P d om in an t h and L G P n on d o m in an t h and * p <.05 ** p <.01 co m p a re d to b a s e lin e (p a ire d t te st) * * * ** ** * * ** ** ** ** ** 0.00 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.00 0 2 4 6 8 10 Proportion rem aining im paired Years since H AA R T K aplan-M eier estim ates ofthe probability ofrem aining cognitively im paired in the 116 cognitively im paired H IV + patients,by year ofH A A R T 1 2 A bnorm alN europsychologicalTestB attery results consistentw ith H IV-related N eurocognitive Im pairment Exclusion ofconfounding conditions H IV-related neurocognitive im pairm ent (n=116 patients) Serial neuropsychological assessm ents Impaired Unimpaired (PersistentN C I) (R eversible N CI) n=81 (69.8% ) n=35 (30.2% ) HAART Main Findings Changes in Neuropsychological Test Battery during HAART. HAART was associated with significant improvements in neuropsychological performances at months 6, 12, 18, 24, 36, 48 of treatment, but no longer beyond the 48 th month. The improvement was more prominent in neurocognitive measures exploring mental flexibility and fine motor functioning, and less prominent in neurocognitive measures exploring memory and concentration and speed of mental processing. Prevalence of persistent neurocognitive impairment (NCI). A persistent NCI was observed in 69% of patients, despite 9 years of HAART. Factors associated with persistent neurocognitive impairment. Patients with persistent NCI were less educated (10.1 vs 12.4 years; p=.004), predominantly female (75.3% vs 94.3; p=.017), had a worse baseline mean NPZ8 global score (-2.29 vs -1.47; p=.026), and a lower improvement in mean NPZ8 score between baseline and first follow-up Results Patient’s characteristics at enrollment. 116 neurocognitively impaired patients were included. 68 (58.6%) patients were antiretroviral naïve, while 48 (41.4%) were HAART-experienced. HAART-naïve and HAART-experienced patients did not differ in terms of age, education, gender, clinical stage, positive HCV serology, nadir CD4 cell count, peak plasma viral load. As expected, HAART-experienced patients had higher CD4 cell count, lower plasma viral load, longer time since first documented positive HIV test. Finally, the neuropsychological profile did not differ between the two groups. Changes in Neuropsychological (NP) Test Battery during HAART. The changes in NP test results were assessed among the 68 naïve patients only. NP z-scores showed significant (p<.05) improvements after 6, 12, 18, 24, 36, 48 months of HAART, but no longer beyond the 48 th month. The improvement was more prominent in neurocognitive measures exploring mental flexibility (71.4% of measures) and fine motor functioning (64.3% of measures) and less prominent in neurocognitive measures exploring memory (28.6% of measures) and concentration and speed of mental processing (21.4% of measures). Prevalence of persistent neurocognitive impairment. Overall, a reversible NCI was observed in 35/116 (30.2%) patients, while a persistent NCI was observed in 81 (69.8%) of patients. After 9 years of HAART the estimated probability of remaining neurocognitively impaired was 69% , by Kaplan-Meier. Factors associated with persistent neurocognitive impairment. Age, CDC stage, risk category, baseline CD4+ count and viral load, virological response to HAART, changes in viral load and CD4+ count, use of CNS penetrating drugs did not differ between patients with persistent or reversible NCI. By contrast, Conclusions Although HAART was associated with a reversal of neurocognitive abnormalities, the impairment persisted in nearly 2/3 of cases despite 9 years of HAART. Less severe impairment and prompt improvement in cognitive performance were both independently associated with reversible NCI. Our data indicate that HAART should be initiated as soon as NCI is diagnosed to avoid a potentially irreversible neurological damage. Additional treatment strategies are needed in patients with persistent NCI despite HAART. 2 1 3 3 2 4 4 4 4 4 4 5 6 7 5 6 7 4 3 6 7 4

Factors Associated with Persistent Neurocognitive Impairment Despite Long-term HAART in Patients with HIV-Dementia V Tozzi, P Balestra, MF Salvatori, C

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • Factors Associated with Persistent Neurocognitive Impairment Despite Long-term HAART in Patients with HIV-DementiaV Tozzi, P Balestra, MF Salvatori, C Vlassi, A Corpolongo, R Bellagamba, P Lorenzini, S Galgani, M Zaccarelli, G Liuzzi, L Giancola, U Visco-Comandini, E Boumis, A Antinori, P Narciso. National Institute for Infectious Diseases "L. Spallanzani", Via Portuense 292, 00149 Rome, Italy. *Contact e-mail: [email protected] optimal treatment for HIV-D has not been established, but there are strong evidences that the highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) is effective in treating the neurocognitive impairment (NCI). However, although potent antiretroviral treatment can reverse HIV-D, the benefits vary substantially between individuals. In the era of HAART, the course of HIV-D has changed, and several distinct patters of evolution of cognitive functions have been proposed. Although these patterns have not been fully characterized, they include: 1) improvement of cognitive functions with full reversal of the cognitive deficit (reversible NCI), 2a) initial improvement after the initiation of HAART but with significant persistent neurological deficit, or 2b) slow continued decline in neurocognitive functions with or without effective peripheral virological control (persistent NCI). Thus, although HAART improves NCI, predictors of reversible NCI are unknown. Therefore, we have conducted a prospective observational study to examine the clinical course of HIV associated NCI in patients with HIV-D treated with HAART. Aims To describe prevalence of persistent neurocognitive impairment despite long-term HAART in patients with HIV-D. To assess and risk factors for persistent neurocognitive impairment despite long-term HAART in patients with HIV-D.MethodsDesign. Prospective observational study.Setting. National Institute for Infectious Diseases, L Spallanzani, Rome, Italy.Patients. All patients with HIV-related NCI (as defined below) seen in our Institute since 1995. Exclusion criteria. Opportunistic infections or tumors of the CNS, any confounding neurological illness, major neurological or psychiatric disorders, current drug abuse, use of sedative-hypnotics. Neuropsychological testing. A battery of 17 standardized tests sensitive to a wide spectrum of different cognitive domains. Administered by one of us (P.B.). Requiring approximately 90 minutes to complete.Neuropsychological (NP) testing z-scores. The NPl scores from each test was transformed into a z-scores using a reference population. Each z-score was adjusted so that negative values indicated below-average performance. Summary global NPZ8 and NPZ4 scores were also ogtained. Neurological diagnosis. HIV-related neurocognitive impairment (NCI) was defined as performing below one standard deviation for the normative mean on at least two NP tests or two standard deviations below the mean on at least one test. The diagnosis of NCI also required the exclusion of other conditions that could explain the finding. HAART regimens. As best judged by the treating physician. Criteria for the diagnosis of either reversible or persistent neurocognitive impairment (NCI). According to the results of serial NP assessments, patients were considered having either reversible or persistent NCI. End points. Neuropsychological test results.Statistics. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate the probability of reversible neurocognitive impairment over time. The association between reversible NCI and selected characteristics was assessed by means of the chi-square test, or, when appropriate, by means of the students t-test. A multivariable analysis using a multiple logistic regression model was performed in order to assess statistically significant associations between reversible neurocognitive impairment and main demographic (age, gender, years of education), clinical (HIV disease stage at enrollment, virological response to HAART, antiretroviral treatment, exposure to CSF penetrating drugs), laboratory (CD4 cell count at enrollment and during follow-up, plasma HIV RNA at enrollment and during follow-up), and neuropsychological (NPZ4 and NPZ8 scores at enrollment and follow-up) variables. Moreover, a multiple logistic regression was also used to assess the probability of reversible neurocognitive impairment adjusted by the same variables. AbstractE-119

    Factors associated with reversible neurocognitive impairment (NCI)Reversible NCI All patients No Yes p (n=116) (n=81) (n=35) Age in years, mean (SD) 41.5 (8.4) 40.7 (8.0) 43.4 (9.0) .110Education in years, mean (SD) 10.8 (3.9) 10.1 (3.6) 12.4 (4.4) .004Gender, n. (%) female21 (18.1)20 (24.7) 2 (5.7) .017Months of follow-up, mean (SD) 36.2 (27.7)35.6 (26.7)37.6 (30.0).725HIV transmission modality, n. (%):- Intravenous drug use47 (40.2)37 (45.7)10 (28.6)- MSM27 (23.1)17 (20.9)10 (28.6).408- Heterosexuality40 (35.0)25 (30.9)15 (42.3)- unknown2 (1.7) 2 (2.5) 0HIV clinical stage, n. (%):- CDC group A or B56 (48.7) 35 (43.2)21 (60.0).148- CDC group C60 (51.3)46 (56.8) 14 (40.0)Positive HCV serology, n. (%)56 (47.)44 (54.3)12 (34.3).231Baseline CD4 cell/ml, mean (SD) 259 (224) 268 (228) 238 (219).514Nadir CD4 cell/ml, mean (SD) 153 (137) 142 (116) 178 (174).205Bas viral load log cp/ml, mean (SD)3.93 (1.4)3.8 (1.5)4.3 (1.3).097Virological suppression (

  • Neuropsychological test battery, by cognitive domain

    Concentration and Speed of Mental Processing

    Trail Making A

    WAIS-R Digit Span (forward)

    WAIS-R Digit Span (backward)

    WAIS-R Digit Symbol

    Stroop Word and Colour

    Corsi Cube test

    Mental Flexibility

    Trail Making B

    Stroop Colour-Word

    Stroop Colour-Word

    Controlled Oral Word

    Memory

    Rey Auditory Verbal Learning

    Rey Auditory Verbal Learning after 15

    Rey Complex Figure, delayed

    Figura Complessa di Rey, ritardata

    Babcock Story Recall, immediate

    Babcock Story Recall, delayed

    Fine Motor Functioning

    Lafayette Grooved Pegboard, dominant

    Lafayette Grooved Pegboard, non domin.

    Visuospatial and Constructional

    Rey Complex Figure, copy

  • Neuropsychological testing:criteria for interpretation

    Scores are adjusted for gender, age, education and compared to population based norms. Criteria for impairment: >1 SD below the normative mean on two tests or > 2 SD below the normative mean on one test. Impaired patients: evaluation of other conditions that could explain the finding (clinical, laboratory, neuroimaging). Clinical evaluation of functional impairment. Diagnostic criteria for HIV-D: impairment meeting or not meeting HIV-D criteria.

  • Delta changes from baseline in NPZ4* and NPZ8** scores in 68 HAART naive cognitively impaired patients, by month of HAART. * Trail Making A, Trail Making B, Lafayette Grooved Pegboard dominant hand, WAIS-R DigitSymbol** Trail Making A, Trail Making B, Lafayette Grooved Pegboard dominant hand, Lafayette Grooved Pegboard non dominant hand, WAIS-R Digit Span (backward), WAIS-R DigitSymbol, Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test, Rey Auditory Verbal Learning after 15

    * p

  • Delta changes from baseline in neuropsychological tests exploring concentration and speed of mental processing in 68 HAART naive cognitively impaired patients, by month of HAART.

    * p

  • Delta changes from baseline in neuropsychological tests exploring mental flexibility in 68 HAART naive cognitively impaired patients, by month of HAART.

    * p

  • Delta changes from baseline in neuropsychological tests exploring memory in 68 HAART naive cognitively impaired patients, by month of HAART.

    * p

  • Delta changes from baseline in neuropsychological tests exploring fine motor functioning in 68 HAART naive cognitively impaired patients, by month of HAART.

    * p

  • Proportion remaining impaired

    Years since HAART

    Kaplan-Meier estimates of the probability of remaining cognitively impaired in the 116 cognitively impaired HIV+ patients, by year of HAART

  • Abnormal Neuropsychological Test Battery results consistent with HIV-related Neurocognitive Impairment

    Exclusion of confounding conditions

    HIV-related neurocognitive impairment(n=116 patients)

    Serial neuropsychological assessments

    Impaired Unimpaired (Persistent NCI) (Reversible NCI) n=81 (69.8%) n=35 (30.2%)

    HAART