Fact Sheet on Jail Expansion in Contra Costa

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/31/2019 Fact Sheet on Jail Expansion in Contra Costa

    1/4

    Facts on Incarceration and Deportation in Contra Costa County

    On June 6th

    and 7th

    a representative of the Contra Costa County Sheriff announced that

    the sheriff would like to expand county jail facilities by 150 beds to hold 300 inmates. The costs

    of the construction and ongoing annual costs of staffing these facilities have not been publiclyreleased. Crowding at the countys jail could be addressed by building more jail space, or by

    addressing some of the underlying causes of the high numbers of people incarcerated.

    This fact sheet describes six of the challenges underlying the jail crowding, and six

    opportunities to implement strategies that are backed by the countys strategic plan, scientific

    research on best practices, and broad community support. These solutions are more likely to

    improve community health and safety, and ultimately reduce costs to the county.

    REALIGNMENT

    The ChallengeIn October of 2011, the new state legislation AB109 or realignment took effect, and the

    county became responsible for incarcerating and supervising an increased number of

    individuals with non-serious, non-sexual, and non-violent offenses. Realignment followed a

    thirty-year escalation of mass incarceration and prison expansion, the cost of which became

    unbearable and forced the state to change direction. The legislators writing AB109 hoped that

    the counties could figure out a way to do what it could not: reduce recidivism and find more

    effective ways of responding to crime.

    The Opportunity

    For the first 9 months, the county received $4.57 million from the state for meeting this

    responsibility, which is spent on increasing jail and probation staff and basic health services. For

    the second year, the county is getting $19 million, which can go much further to meet

    community needs like transitional employment, integrated services, and housing. The county

    has a Strategic Plan for Reentry, which includes specific recommendations on reintegrating

    people released from incarceration, but none of it has been implemented yet due to lack of

    funding.1

    The realignment funding is a rare opportunity to implement this plan.

    HOUSING

    The Challenge

    It is widely recognized that stable housing is key to successful reintegration, yet seven out of

    ten recently released Richmond residents do not have stable housing.2

    A study by the CA

    1Contra Costa County Re-entry Strategic Plan:http://www.cocoreentry.org

    2Pacific Institute (2010) Survey of 101 individuals on probation or parole released within the previous 3-18

    months. More information at:http://www.pacinst.org/topics/community_strategies/

    formerly_incarcerated/reentry_report.pdf

    http://www.cocoreentry.org/http://www.cocoreentry.org/http://www.cocoreentry.org/http://www.pacinst.org/topics/community_strategies/%20formerly_incarcerated/reentry_report.pdfhttp://www.pacinst.org/topics/community_strategies/%20formerly_incarcerated/reentry_report.pdfhttp://www.pacinst.org/topics/community_strategies/%20formerly_incarcerated/reentry_report.pdfhttp://www.pacinst.org/topics/community_strategies/%20formerly_incarcerated/reentry_report.pdfhttp://www.pacinst.org/topics/community_strategies/%20formerly_incarcerated/reentry_report.pdfhttp://www.pacinst.org/topics/community_strategies/%20formerly_incarcerated/reentry_report.pdfhttp://www.cocoreentry.org/
  • 7/31/2019 Fact Sheet on Jail Expansion in Contra Costa

    2/4

    Department of Corrections found that 30 to 50 percent of parolees were homeless.3

    Contra

    Costa County probation staff reported in May that 96% of people on AB109 probation have

    housing, but that this includes many inadequate arrangements, such as individuals living in

    backyard tool sheds. While $100,000 of AB109 funding was allotted to transitional housing, as

    of May no one had qualified you must have an income to be eligible. The only housingassistance provided to these returning residents has been a bed at a homeless shelter.

    However, community testimonies and published research has found that staying at a homeless

    shelter actually increases the rate of re-incarceration by up to 17%.4

    The Opportunity

    The Reentry Policy Council recommends several evidence-based strategies for increasing

    housing options available to people coming home, including the use of state and local funding

    used for traditional public safety and criminal justice purposes to finance the development of

    supportive housing.5

    AB109 funding could be dedicated to re-entry housing that builds upon

    existing community-based housing programs.

    REENTRY SERVICES

    The Challenge

    No integrated system exists for maintaining information on and making referrals to the services

    needed by returning residents. Probation and parole officers rely on their own individual

    records and collected business cards to make referrals. Without such a system, individuals are

    unlikely to have needed support during the first 72 hours after release, a period when studies

    have found the greatest risk of death.

    The Opportunity

    Independent evaluations have found that integrated programs like the No Violence Alliance

    have had clients three times less likely to be re-arrested.6

    This program and other like it cost

    less than $10,000 per client, a fifth of the cost of incarceration. Community-based organizations

    and service providers in West Contra Costa are in the process of designing such a program that

    could be funded in the coming year at multiple sites.

    3California Department of Corrections (1997) Prevention Parolee Failure Program: An Evaluation.

    4Stephen Metraux and Dennis P. Culhane (2004) Homeless Shelter Use and Reincarceration: Assessing the Risk,

    Criminology and Public Policy3, no. 2, pp 201-222.5

    Council of State Governments Reentry Policy Council (2005) Report of the Re-Entry Policy Council: Charting the

    Safe and Successful Return of Prisoners to the Community. New York: Council of State Governments.6

    No Violence Alliance evaluation

  • 7/31/2019 Fact Sheet on Jail Expansion in Contra Costa

    3/4

    DETENTION OF IMMIGRANTS

    The Challenge

    Contra Costa County has the highest rate of deportation of immigrants who have not been

    convicted of anything in all of the Bay Area. 1/3 of all immigrants whom ICE has arrested under

    SCOMM have never been convicted of anything;The Opportunity

    Santa Clara, San Francisco, and other counties have stopped cooperating with the ICE Secure

    Communities program. Contra Costa Sheriff could decide to no longer refer people to ICE who

    do not have a violent or serious offense.

    PRE-TRIAL DETENTION AND BAIL REFORM

    The Challenge

    85% of the Contra Costa County jail inmates (approximately 1,300 individuals) are pre-trial, as

    in they are incarcerated despite having not been tried and convicted. This is fourteen percentabove the state rate and twenty four percent above the national average.

    7These individuals are

    incarcerated primarily because they simply cannot afford bail, and as a result are prevented

    from continuing or pursuing employment and engaging in family and community life.

    The Opportunity

    The countys Community Corrections Partnership has participated in trainings and researched

    bail reform best practices that more effectively gage the risk of releasing an individual on public

    safety, while reducing the jail population. Santa Cruz county enacted such a system in 2005,

    releasing low-level offenders on their own recognizance, and found that after two years 92%

    had not re-offended, and 90 jail beds a day were saved. Camden, New Jersey, enacted similar

    changes and reduced its jail population by 21%, saving $9 million annually.8

    EMPLOYMENT

    The Challenge

    Approximately eighty percent of formerly incarcerated residents are unemployed, according to

    both the Pacific Institute survey and a May report by probation staff. With such extreme

    unemployment, this community is prevented from gaining the independence and dignity

    necessary to reintegrate successfully.

    The Opportunity

    Transitional employment programs can provide direct employment and training, ensuring both

    short-term needs and a path toward long-term employment. Large projects like the

    7ACLU (2012) Public Safety Realignment; California at a Crossroads:

    https://www.aclunc.org/issues/criminal_justice/realignment_will_california_confront_its_incarceration_crisis.sht

    ml8

    ACLU (2012)

    https://www.aclunc.org/issues/criminal_justice/realignment_will_california_confront_its_incarceration_crisis.shtmlhttps://www.aclunc.org/issues/criminal_justice/realignment_will_california_confront_its_incarceration_crisis.shtmlhttps://www.aclunc.org/issues/criminal_justice/realignment_will_california_confront_its_incarceration_crisis.shtmlhttps://www.aclunc.org/issues/criminal_justice/realignment_will_california_confront_its_incarceration_crisis.shtmlhttps://www.aclunc.org/issues/criminal_justice/realignment_will_california_confront_its_incarceration_crisis.shtml
  • 7/31/2019 Fact Sheet on Jail Expansion in Contra Costa

    4/4

    construction of the Lawrence Berkeley National Lab provide potential employment placements

    for which a transitional employment program could prepare formerly incarcerated residents.

    The county itself is one of the largest employers and can implement the recommendation of its

    Reentry Strategic Plan to ban the box and level the playing field for residents with a past

    conviction applying for county positions.

    VIOLENCE PREVENTION

    The Challenge

    Violent crime and gun violence continue to take lives and devastate families and communities

    in Contra Costa County. In the community of North Richmond alone there were more than five

    shootings in the last month. The Richmond Ceasefire-Lifelines to Healing initiative is a

    community-driven collaboration between law-enforcement, community and clergy leaders to

    reduce gun violence, recidivism and built a pathway to opportunities for those most impacted

    by gun violence. Every major law enforcement entity in Contra Costa County is at the

    Ceasefire-Lifelines working group table, except the Contra Costa Sheriff's Office despite

    numerous requests from working group partners. This has made implementation in the greater

    Richmond area difficult because of the lack of coordination and accountability.

    The Opportunity

    Ceasefire-Lifelines is a proven strategy to save lives and has proven to reduce gun violence

    nearly 70% in cities across the country. The early data shows that gun violence is down nearly

    50% at this time in 2011, however, community efforts have been hampered by the lack of

    cooperation from Sheriff David Livingston. It is imperative that the Contra Costa Sheriff's Office

    join the Ceasefire-Lifelines to Healing working group table and embrace the goals of the

    initiative to keep our community alive and free and build pathways to opportunity.