Upload
nassor
View
40
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Objective: coat at least 90% of the SPS with a carbon thin film with low secondary electron emission in order to mitigate electron cloud. Objects to coat: dipoles (MBB+MBA = 70%), Quadrupoles (QD+QF = 10%), LSS (10%), eventually SSS (10%). The pumping port shields shall also be coated. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Facility to coat the SPS magnets with carbon
Objective: coat at least 90% of the SPS with a carbon thin film with low secondary electron emission in order to mitigate electron cloud.
Objects to coat: dipoles (MBB+MBA = 70%), Quadrupoles (QD+QF = 10%), LSS (10%), eventually SSS (10%). The pumping port shields shall also be coated.
Facility to coat the SPS magnets with carbon
Objective: coat at least 90% of the SPS with a carbon thin film with low secondary electron emission in order to mitigate electron cloud.
Objects to coat: dipoles (MBB+MBA = 70%), Quadrupoles (QD+QF = 10%), LSS (10%), eventually SSS (10%). The pumping port shields shall also be coated.
Quadrupoles , drift tubes for LSS and SSS, and pumping port shields will be coated in actual facility (b. 181-R-F12) (potential conflicts with NEG coating for LHC have not yet been analyzed)
Surface cleaning is mandatory prior to coat. Two options: 1) wet cleaning; 2) plasma cleaning (validation foreseen for 2014).
Facility to coat the SPS magnets with carbon
Surface requirements: 600 m2 (+100m2 for storage); >18 tons crane. Close to BA3 or BA5. (avoid road transport and easy extraction from tunnel )
Production constrains: ~1000 magnets to be cleaned and coated in one year (LS2) => 6 / day.
Coating systems required to assure such pace: 1) if wet cleaning 12; 2) if plasma cleaning 16. (two dipoles piled up per coating system).
Production steps for each dipole:
TE-VSC
Surfacecleaning coatingDismount
from SPS transport tocoating lab
TE-MSC
TransportTo SPS installation
TE-MSC
WET CLEANING PLASMA CLEANING
Surface required 600 (+100) m2 600 (+100) m2
Manpower 2 + 3 + 1 4 + 1
Advantages •Is Independent of coating systems
•Less handling of dipoles•The same people for cleaning and coating;
Disadvantages •Handling of radioactive liquids (0.5 Ton / dipole);•Install “demineralized” water circuit.
•Requires more coating systems
Wet vs Plasma cleaning
Coating system
16 meter
Dipoles pilled up by two
Pumping system + gas injection+ plasma generator + step motor
Structure to support graphite cathodeAnd stainless steel anode (in case of plasma cleaning)
16 coating systems in parallel
32 meter
19 meter
The prototype coating system (b.181-R-G12)
The prototype coating system (b.181-R-G12)
The prototype coating system (b.181-R-G12)