Facey_W

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/12/2019 Facey_W

    1/5

    Technical Committee A-6, Aerospace

    Actuation, Control and Fluid Power Systems

    SAE A-6 Project A-6A3-08

    ARP94910, Guide to the Specification ofan FCS for a Militar UA

    Presentation for Panel Access toAirspace

    William B. Facey

    . . .Patuxent River NAS, MD

    [email protected]

    AUVSIs Unmanned Systems North America 2009Washington, DC, August 10-13, 2009 9/3/2009, Page 1

  • 8/12/2019 Facey_W

    2/5

    Technical Committee A-6, Aerospace

    Actuation, Control and Fluid Power Systems

    Project Definition & Approval

    In July 2007 the A-6 released AS94900 Aerospace Flight Control Systems , ,

    For Adopted by DoD to replace MIL-F-9490 on November 5, 2007.

    Version of the AS for UAs suggested to Armed Services and drew

    immediate support from NAVAIR, the US Army and the USAF.

    Approved by A-6 Steering Council as an ARP because although theFCS technology employed for UAs is mature, the application is not

    Whereas an AS Aerospace Standard contains specific performance

    requirements. conforming to broadly accepted engineering practices

    an ARP - Aerospace Recommended Practice is intended as a guide tostandard engineering practices. with content of a more general nature,

    or that have not yet gained broad acceptance.

    AUVSIs Unmanned Systems North America 2009Washington, DC, August 10-13, 2009 9/3/2009, Page 2

  • 8/12/2019 Facey_W

    3/5

    Technical Committee A-6, Aerospace

    Actuation, Control and Fluid Power Systems

    What is The Need?

    A document that will provide a basis for making design and

    per ormance ec s ons an u gments or uture s.

    UAs have different needs from manned aircraft

    Currently no standards for UA FCS subsystems.

    The specifications for UAs now in development relied on selecting

    relevant requirements from manned aircraft specifications.

    Difficult, time-consumin rocess with no industr involvement.

    UA mission creep - continuing expansion of UAS missions and

    operating areas.

    Drives us to re uire increased levels of airworthiness out of UAS

    platforms.

    Not always possible if not designed into system from start.

    AUVSIs Unmanned Systems North America 2009Washington, DC, August 10-13, 2009 9/3/2009, Page 3

  • 8/12/2019 Facey_W

    4/5

    Technical Committee A-6, Aerospace

    Actuation, Control and Fluid Power Systems

    Terms of Reference

    Guide to the specification of the FCS for the UA not the entire UAS

    Cover range of FCS capability required for the range of UAs coveredby figure A.4 in the DOD 2007 roadmap. (Except smallest TBD)

    , , ,test and quality assurance requirements, similar in structure, scopeand depth to AS94900.

    Function and performance oriented

    Guiding creation of a performance requirement specification

    Covers FCS and subsystems design and integration with the vehicle butdoes not specify specific architectural approaches.

    mp as s: The differing levels of performance capability required for different UA

    categories and operational areas.

    AUVSIs Unmanned Systems North America 2009Washington, DC, August 10-13, 2009 9/3/2009, Page 4

    r mar y e av or o ow ng rst an secon a ures.

  • 8/12/2019 Facey_W

    5/5

    Technical Committee A-6, Aerospace

    Actuation, Control and Fluid Power Systems

    Concluding Notes:

    First A-6 balloting to A-6 panels and A-6 in 2010, release in

    .

    We think, with the exception of standards associated with UA

    , .

    It is likely to precede standards and regulations determining

    how some key requirements are derived. UA standardswriting will be iterative for some time.

    AUVSIs Unmanned Systems North America 2009Washington, DC, August 10-13, 2009 9/3/2009, Page 5