18
FACE Gasoline Fuels with Ethanol By John Orban and Elizabeth Slone, Battelle September 10, 2010 The selection of ten gasoline FACE fuels was approved by the FACE Committee at the October 2009 committee meeting in East Liberty, Ohio. However it was suggested that ethanol should have been one of the main factors considered in the selection process. The purpose of this activity is to determine predicted properties of supplemental FACE gasoline fuels containing specified levels of ethanol (20% and 30%). The FACE Committee recommended using data from the American Petroleum Institute (API) report “Determination of the Potential Property Ranges of Mid-Level Ethanol Blends”, (April 23, 2010). The data contained in an appendix to the API report were downloaded from an API website for use in the analysis that follows. The API study involved the collection of 71 ethanol-free gasoline samples collected from retail outlets or donated from API member companies and blended with various levels of ethanol ranging from 10% to 30%. The samples were analyzed for ethanol level, vapor pressure, distillation, and octane levels. The data presented in the API report can be used to develop predictions of properties for blends of the baseline fuel with specified percentages of ethanol; however, the API study did not develop any predictive relationships, except in a very qualitative and empirical manner. An attempt was made to characterize such relationships for properties of interest to the FACE program (RON, sensitivity, T 10 , T 50 , T 90 , vapor pressure, and specific gravity) ; but it became apparent that the effort to derive predictive formulas was beyond the scope of this activity. Instead, we chose a more practical approach using simple linear predictions of fuel blend properties based only on the baseline (0% ethanol) property and the percent of ethanol being added. Separate linear equations were used to predict properties with 20% and 30% ethanol using only data in the range of +/- 5% of the target ethanol level. Specifically, we assumed the following relationship: P x = α + γ * P x=0 + β * P x=0 * X, Where P x is the property of interest in the blend containing X% ethanol (X=0%, 20%, 30%); P x=0 is the baseline property; and α, γ, and β are constants (regression coefficients). Using the API dataset reveals the coefficient estimates shown in Table 1. Figures 1 though 9 contain a graphical summary of the data. The top portion of each figure contains plots of the residuals (measured – predicted) versus the predicted values for judging the goodness of fit (random scatter is a good fit) and characterizing the uncertainty in the prediction. The middle portion shows how the baseline properties in the API report (o) compare with the corresponding properties of the baseline FACE fuels (letters A-J). Finally, the bottom portion shows the predicted (lines) and observed fuel properties from the API dataset and the predicted properties of the FACE fuels with 20% and 30% ethanol blends. An Excel spreadsheet version of the model is available upon request to CRC.

FACE Gasoline Fuels with Ethanol By John Orban and ... · FACE Gasoline Fuels with Ethanol By John Orban and Elizabeth Slone, Battelle September 10, 2010 . The selection of ten gasoline

  • Upload
    lenga

  • View
    214

  • Download
    1

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: FACE Gasoline Fuels with Ethanol By John Orban and ... · FACE Gasoline Fuels with Ethanol By John Orban and Elizabeth Slone, Battelle September 10, 2010 . The selection of ten gasoline

FACE Gasoline Fuels with Ethanol

By John Orban and Elizabeth Slone, Battelle

September 10, 2010

The selection of ten gasoline FACE fuels was approved by the FACE Committee at the October 2009 committee meeting in East Liberty, Ohio. However it was suggested that ethanol should have been one of the main factors considered in the selection process.

The purpose of this activity is to determine predicted properties of supplemental FACE gasoline fuels containing specified levels of ethanol (20% and 30%). The FACE Committee recommended using data from the American Petroleum Institute (API) report “Determination of the Potential Property Ranges of Mid-Level Ethanol Blends”, (April 23, 2010). The data contained in an appendix to the API report were downloaded from an API website for use in the analysis that follows.

The API study involved the collection of 71 ethanol-free gasoline samples collected from retail outlets or donated from API member companies and blended with various levels of ethanol ranging from 10% to 30%. The samples were analyzed for ethanol level, vapor pressure, distillation, and octane levels. The data presented in the API report can be used to develop predictions of properties for blends of the baseline fuel with specified percentages of ethanol; however, the API study did not develop any predictive relationships, except in a very qualitative and empirical manner. An attempt was made to characterize such relationships for properties of interest to the FACE program (RON, sensitivity, T10, T50, T90, vapor pressure, and specific gravity) ; but it became apparent that the effort to derive predictive formulas was beyond the scope of this activity. Instead, we chose a more practical approach using simple linear predictions of fuel blend properties based only on the baseline (0% ethanol) property and the percent of ethanol being added. Separate linear equations were used to predict properties with 20% and 30% ethanol using only data in the range of +/- 5% of the target ethanol level. Specifically, we assumed the following relationship:

Px = α + γ * Px=0 + β * Px=0 * X,

Where Px is the property of interest in the blend containing X% ethanol (X=0%, 20%, 30%); Px=0 is the baseline property; and α, γ, and β are constants (regression coefficients). Using the API dataset reveals the coefficient estimates shown in Table 1. Figures 1 though 9 contain a graphical summary of the data. The top portion of each figure contains plots of the residuals (measured – predicted) versus the predicted values for judging the goodness of fit (random scatter is a good fit) and characterizing the uncertainty in the prediction. The middle portion shows how the baseline properties in the API report (o) compare with the corresponding properties of the baseline FACE fuels (letters A-J). Finally, the bottom portion shows the predicted (lines) and observed fuel properties from the API dataset and the predicted properties of the FACE fuels with 20% and 30% ethanol blends.

An Excel spreadsheet version of the model is available upon request to CRC.

Page 2: FACE Gasoline Fuels with Ethanol By John Orban and ... · FACE Gasoline Fuels with Ethanol By John Orban and Elizabeth Slone, Battelle September 10, 2010 . The selection of ten gasoline

Table 1. Estimated Regression Coefficients for Predicting Fuel Properties with Blends of 20% and 30% Ethanol

α γ β RON 15 < Ethanol < 24 50.8336 0.4573 0.0032

26 < Ethanol < 35 82.0859 0.2339 -0.0010 MON 15 < Ethanol < 24 28.6880 0.6715 0.0014

26 < Ethanol < 35 55.4224 0.4579 -0.0019 Sensitivity 15 < Ethanol < 24 7.0093 0.1846 0.0170

26 < Ethanol < 35 9.6374 0.2876 -0.0003 ROAD 15 < Ethanol < 24 39.9852 0.5562 0.0024

26 < Ethanol < 35 70.0026 0.3294 -0.0015 Distillation_10 15 < Ethanol < 24 43.9954 0.5840 0.0020

26 < Ethanol < 35 52.1245 0.4889 0.0032 Distillation_50 15 < Ethanol < 24 100.0714 0.3092 -0.0009

26 < Ethanol < 35 141.2436 0.0848 0.0007 Distillation_90 15 < Ethanol < 24 -7.6085 1.0326 -0.0022

26 < Ethanol < 35 -94.2252 1.3379 -0.0034 Specific_Gravity 15 < Ethanol < 24 0.1984 0.7259 0.0008

26 < Ethanol < 35 0.2982 0.6241 -0.0003 VaporPressure 15 < Ethanol < 24 2.1512 0.9057 -0.0016

26 < Ethanol < 35 2.1904 0.9459 -0.0036

Property Ethanol Group Coefficients

Page 3: FACE Gasoline Fuels with Ethanol By John Orban and ... · FACE Gasoline Fuels with Ethanol By John Orban and Elizabeth Slone, Battelle September 10, 2010 . The selection of ten gasoline

The 10 FACE fuel properties are provided in the Table 2, along with estimates for fuel properties with the addition of 20 and 30 % ethanol. Baseline (0% ethanol) fuel properties are the average of KEN and CPChem measurements provided to Battelle. Aromatics and n-Paraffins have been estimated using the following calculation:

Px = Px=0 * (1 – X/100)

Fuel Ethanol RON MON Sensitivity ROAD T10 T50 T90 Specific Gravity

Vapor Pressure Aromatics NParaffins

A 0% 86.00 85.85 0.20 85.93 144.50 203.50 221.50 0.75 7.15 0.75 6.60 A 20% 95.68 88.82 7.11 91.93 134.14 159.48 211.49 0.75 8.40 0.60 5.28 A 30% 99.74 89.97 9.69 94.54 136.44 162.78 179.78 0.76 8.19 0.53 4.62 B 0% 94.95 91.95 3.00 93.45 150.00 215.50 240.50 0.71 7.25 4.45 8.10 B 20% 100.35 93.09 8.59 96.48 137.57 162.98 230.29 0.73 8.48 3.56 6.48 B 30% 101.57 92.42 10.47 96.69 139.65 164.06 203.28 0.74 8.27 3.12 5.67 C 0% 84.15 82.90 1.25 83.53 142.00 202.50 243.00 0.73 7.15 2.50 24.00 C 20% 94.71 86.75 7.67 90.48 132.58 159.19 232.76 0.74 8.40 2.00 19.20 C 30% 99.36 88.78 9.98 93.86 134.99 162.68 206.38 0.75 8.19 1.75 16.80 D 0% 93.85 87.25 6.60 90.55 140.50 240.00 359.50 0.58 7.10 28.85 19.71 D 20% 99.77 89.80 10.48 94.73 131.65 170.14 348.00 0.63 8.35 23.08 15.77 D 30% 101.35 90.53 11.47 95.86 134.11 166.65 350.49 0.66 8.14 20.20 13.80 E 0% 88.65 82.30 6.40 85.48 143.00 201.50 276.00 0.65 7.15 8.75 7.40 E 20% 97.06 86.33 10.37 91.66 133.21 158.90 265.40 0.68 8.40 7.00 5.92 E 30% 100.28 88.54 11.42 94.41 135.57 162.57 247.20 0.70 8.19 6.13 5.18 F 0% 95.15 86.35 8.80 90.75 140.00 192.00 278.00 0.63 7.45 9.20 4.10 F 20% 100.45 89.17 11.63 94.85 131.33 156.12 267.38 0.67 8.66 7.36 3.28 F 30% 101.62 90.17 12.08 95.92 133.82 161.57 249.67 0.69 8.44 6.44 2.87 G 0% 97.45 86.75 10.70 92.10 137.00 242.00 367.00 0.54 7.95 31.90 3.70 G 20% 101.65 89.45 12.63 95.67 129.46 170.72 355.42 0.60 9.10 25.52 2.96 G 30% 102.09 90.33 12.61 96.31 132.07 166.86 359.77 0.63 8.86 22.33 2.59 H 0% 86.35 78.50 7.85 82.43 143.50 229.00 325.00 0.54 7.45 34.65 21.00 H 20% 95.86 83.67 11.13 89.82 133.52 166.92 313.87 0.60 8.66 27.72 16.80 H 30% 99.81 87.01 11.82 93.54 135.86 165.48 307.81 0.63 8.44 24.26 14.70 I 0% 72.30 71.50 0.85 71.90 161.00 204.00 227.50 0.73 7.50 1.90 9.90 I 20% 88.53 78.77 7.46 83.45 144.44 159.63 217.43 0.74 8.70 1.52 7.92 I 30% 96.93 84.19 9.87 90.54 146.07 162.84 187.20 0.75 8.48 1.33 6.93 J 0% 76.25 72.05 4.20 74.15 179.00 215.50 337.00 0.59 6.75 26.80 23.10 J 20% 90.59 79.15 9.22 84.81 155.66 162.98 325.74 0.64 8.05 21.44 18.48 J 30% 97.74 84.41 10.80 91.18 156.58 164.06 322.66 0.66 7.85 18.76 16.17

Figures 10 and 11 contain two-dimensional and three dimensional plots of the main (Ethanol, RON, sensitivity, aromatics, and N-paraffins) and secondary fuel properties.

Page 4: FACE Gasoline Fuels with Ethanol By John Orban and ... · FACE Gasoline Fuels with Ethanol By John Orban and Elizabeth Slone, Battelle September 10, 2010 . The selection of ten gasoline

Figure 1. RON versus Ethanol with Predicted Values (Note that Data is Restricted to that in the Ethanol Modeling Group Range)

All Data Estimates/Observed vs. Ethanol

RON

88 90 92 94 96 98

100 102 104

Ethanol (%)

10 20 30 40

A

A B B

C

C D D

E

E F F G G

H

H

I

I

J

J

o o

o o

o o

o o

o o

o o

o o o o

o

o o o

o

o

o o o

o

o o o

o o

o o

o o

o o

o o o

o

o o o o o o

o o o

o o o o

o o o o

o o

o o

API vs. FACE at Ethanol = 0

API

FACE

RON

70 80 90 100

A B C D E F G H I J

o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o

API Pred. vs. Residuals (15 < Ethanol < 24)

Residual

-2

-1

0

1

2

3

predicted

92 94 96 98 100 102 104

o o

o o

o

o

o o

o o

o o

o

o o

o o

o o o

o o

o o

o

o

o

o o

o

o

o

o o o o

o o

o

o o

API Pred. vs. Residuals (26 < Ethanol < 35)

Residual

-1

0

1

2

predicted

99 100 101 102 103

o

o

o

o

o

o

o

o

o

o o

o o

o o o

o

o o

o

o

Page 5: FACE Gasoline Fuels with Ethanol By John Orban and ... · FACE Gasoline Fuels with Ethanol By John Orban and Elizabeth Slone, Battelle September 10, 2010 . The selection of ten gasoline

Figure 2. MON versus Ethanol with Predicted Values

All Data Estimates/Observed vs. Ethanol

MON

78 80 82 84 86 88 90 92 94

Ethanol (%)

10 20 30 40

A A

B B

C C

D D

E E F F G G

H

H

I

I

J

J

o o

o o

o o

o o

o o

o o

o o

o o o

o o o o o o o

o

o o o o

o o o o o o

o o

o o

o o

o

o

o

o

o

o

o o o

o o o o

o o

o o o o o o

API vs. FACE at Ethanol = 0

API

FACE

MON

70 80 90 100

A B C D E F G H I J

o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o

API Pred. vs. Residuals (15 < Ethanol < 24)

Residual

-2

-1

0

1

2

3

predicted

84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93

o o

o

o

o o

o o

o o

o o o

o o

o o

o

o o o

o o

o o

o o

o o o

o

o o o o

o o o o

o o

API Pred. vs. Residuals (26 < Ethanol < 35)

Residual

-2

-1

0

1

2

predicted

87 88 89 90 91 92

o

o

o

o

o o o

o

o

o o

o o

o o

o

o

o o

o o

Page 6: FACE Gasoline Fuels with Ethanol By John Orban and ... · FACE Gasoline Fuels with Ethanol By John Orban and Elizabeth Slone, Battelle September 10, 2010 . The selection of ten gasoline

Figure 3. Sensitivity versus Ethanol with Predicted Values

All Data Estimates/Observed vs. Ethanol

Sensitivity

6 7 8 9

10 11 12 13 14 15

Ethanol (%)

10 20 30 40

A

A B

B

C

C D D

E E F F

G G

H H

I

I J

J o

o o

o

o o

o

o

o o o o

o o

o

o o

o o o o

o

o o

o o

o o o

o o o o o

o o

o

o o

o o o

o

o

o o o

o

o

o o o

o o o

o o o o o

o o

API vs. FACE at Ethanol = 0

API

FACE

Sensitivity

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

A B C D E F G H I J

o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o

API Pred. vs. Residuals (15 < Ethanol < 24)

Residual

-3

-2

-1

0

1

2

predicted

8 9 10 11 12 13 14

o o o

o

o o o o

o o

o o o

o o

o

o

o o o

o

o

o o o

o

o

o o o o

o o

o o

o o

o o

o

o

API Pred. vs. Residuals (26 < Ethanol < 35)

Residual

-1.0 -0.8 -0.6 -0.4 -0.2 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8

predicted

10 11 12 13

o

o

o

o

o

o

o o

o

o

o

o o o

o

o

o

o o

o

o

Page 7: FACE Gasoline Fuels with Ethanol By John Orban and ... · FACE Gasoline Fuels with Ethanol By John Orban and Elizabeth Slone, Battelle September 10, 2010 . The selection of ten gasoline

Figure 4. ROAD versus Ethanol with Predicted Values

All Data Estimates/Observed vs. Ethanol

ROAD

82 84 86 88 90 92 94 96 98

100

Ethanol (%)

10 20 30 40

A A

B B

C

C D D

E

E F F G G

H

H

I

I

J

J

o o

o o

o o

o o

o o

o o

o o o o o

o o o o

o o o o

o o o o

o o o o o o o o

o o

o o

o

o o o o o

o o o

o o o o o o

o o o

o o

o

API vs. FACE at Ethanol = 0

API

FACE

ROAD

70 80 90 100

A B C D E F G H I J

o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o

API Pred. vs. Residuals (15 < Ethanol < 24)

Residual

-2

-1

0

1

2

predicted

88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98

o o

o o

o

o

o o

o o

o o

o

o o

o o

o o o o

o

o

o o

o

o

o o

o

o

o

o o o o o

o o

o o

API Pred. vs. Residuals (26 < Ethanol < 35)

Residual

-1

0

1

2

predicted

93 94 95 96 97

o

o

o

o

o

o

o

o

o

o o

o o

o o o

o

o o

o

o

Page 8: FACE Gasoline Fuels with Ethanol By John Orban and ... · FACE Gasoline Fuels with Ethanol By John Orban and Elizabeth Slone, Battelle September 10, 2010 . The selection of ten gasoline

Figure 5. Distillation at 10% versus Ethanol with Predicted Values

All Data Estimates/Observed vs. Ethanol

10% Distillation (F)

90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160

Ethanol (%)

10 20 30 40

A A B B C C D D E E F F G G H H I I J J

o o o o

o o

o o o o o o

o o o o o o o o o o o o

o o o o o o

o o o

o

o o o o o o o o o o o o

o o

o o o o o o

o o o o o o

o o

o o o o o o o o o o o o o

o o o o

o o

o o

o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o

o o o o

o o o o o o o o o o o

o

o o o o o o

o o

o o

o o o o

o o o o

o o o

o o

o

o o o

o o o o o

o o

o o

o

o

o

o o o o o

o

o o

o o

o o o

o

o o o o o o

o o

o

o

o

o o o o o

o o o o

o o

o o

o o

o o o o

o o

o

o o

o o

o o

API vs. FACE at Ethanol = 0

API

FACE

10% Distillation (F)

90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180

A B C D E F G H I J

o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o

API Pred. vs. Residuals (15 < Ethanol < 24)

Residual

-8 -6 -4 -2 0 2 4 6 8

predicted

100 110 120 130 140 150

o o

o o

o o

o o

o o

o o

o o o o

o o

o o

o o o

o

o o

o o

o o

o o

o

o

o o

o o o o

o o o o

o o

o

o

o o o o

o o o o o o

o o

o o

o o o o o o

o o o o o

o o o o

o o

o o o o

o o

o o o o

o o

o o

o o o o o o o o

o o

o o o

o

o o o

o

o o

o o o

o

o o

o

o

o

o

o o

o o

o o o o

o o

o o

o

o o

API Pred. vs. Residuals (26 < Ethanol < 35)

Residual

-8

-6

-4

-2

0

2

4

6

predicted

100 110 120 130 140 150

o

o

o

o

o

o

o o

o

o o

o

o

o o o

o

o

o

o o

o o

o

o

o o

o

o o

o

o

o

o o

o

o o

o o

o o o o

o o

o o o o

o o o

o

o

o

o

o

o

o

o o

o

o

o

o o

o

o o

o

Page 9: FACE Gasoline Fuels with Ethanol By John Orban and ... · FACE Gasoline Fuels with Ethanol By John Orban and Elizabeth Slone, Battelle September 10, 2010 . The selection of ten gasoline

Figure 6. Distillation at 50% versus Ethanol with Predicted Values

All Data Estimates/Observed vs. Ethanol

50% Distillation (F)

140 150 160 170 180 190 200 210

Ethanol (%)

10 20 30 40

A A B B C C D

D E E F

F G

G H H I I J J

o o o

o o o o o o o

o o o o o o o o

o o o

o

o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o

o o

o o

o o o o o o

o o o o o o

o o o o o

o

o o o

o

o

o

o o o o o o o o o o o o o

o o o o

o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o

o o o o o o o o

o o o o o o

o o o o o

o o o o o o o o o o o o o o

o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o

o o o o o o o o

o o o o o o o o o o o o o o

o o o o

o o o o o o o o o o o o o

o

API vs. FACE at Ethanol = 0

API

FACE

50% Distillation (F)

140 150 160 170 180 190 200 210 220 230 240 250

A B C D E F G H I J

o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o

API Pred. vs. Residuals (15 < Ethanol < 24)

Residual

-10

0

10

20

30

40

predicted

140 150 160 170 180

o o o

o o o o o o o

o

o o o o o o o

o o o

o

o o o o o o o o o

o o o o o

o o

o o o o o o

o o o o o o o o o

o o o o o

o o o

o o o o o o o o o

o o o o o o o o

o

o

o o o

o

o

o

o o o o o o o o o o o o o

o o o o

o o o o o o o o

o o

o o o o o o o

o o o o o o o o

o o o

o o o o o o o

API Pred. vs. Residuals (26 < Ethanol < 35)

Residual

-3

-2

-1

0

1

2

3

predicted

156 158 160 162 164 166 168

o o

o

o o

o

o o

o o o

o

o

o

o

o

o

o

o

o o

o o o o

o o o o o

o o o o o

o

o

o o

o

o o

o o o

o

o o o o

o o

o

o

o

o o

o

o o o

o o o o

o o

o o o

o

Page 10: FACE Gasoline Fuels with Ethanol By John Orban and ... · FACE Gasoline Fuels with Ethanol By John Orban and Elizabeth Slone, Battelle September 10, 2010 . The selection of ten gasoline

Figure 7. Distillation at 90% versus Ethanol with Predicted Values

All Data Estimates/Observed vs. Ethanol

90% Distillation (F)

160 180 200 220 240 260 280 300 320 340 360

Ethanol (%)

10 20 30 40

A

A

B B

C C

D D

E E

F F

G G

H H

I

I

J J o o o o

o o

o o o o o o

o o o o o o o o o o o

o o o o o o o

o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o

o o o o o o o o o o

o o

o o o o o o o o

o o o o o o o o o o o o o

o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o

o o

o o o o o o o o o

o o o

o o

o o o o

o o o o

o o o

o o

o

o o o

o o o o o

o

o o

o

o o o o o o o o

o o o

o o o o

o

o

o o o o o o o o

o

o o

o o o o o o o o o o o

o o o

o

o o o o o o

o

o

o

o

o o o

API vs. FACE at Ethanol = 0

API

FACE

90% Distillation (F)

220 230 240 250 260 270 280 290 300 310 320 330 340 350 360 370

A B C D E F G H I J

o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o

API Pred. vs. Residuals (15 < Ethanol < 24)

Residual

-20

-10

0

10

predicted

240 260 280 300 320 340 360

o o o o

o

o

o o o o

o o

o o

o o o o

o o

o o o

o

o o o

o o

o

o o

o o o o

o o

o o o o o o o

o o o o o

o o o o o o

o

o o o

o o o

o

o o o o

o o

o o o

o o

o o

o o

o o o

o

o o o o o

o

o o o o o

o o

o

o

o o o o o o o

o o o

o o o

o o o o

o o

o o

o o o

o o o o o

o o

o o

o o o o o o o

API Pred. vs. Residuals (26 < Ethanol < 35)

Residual

-70 -60 -50 -40 -30 -20 -10

0 10 20 30

predicted

220 240 260 280 300 320 340

o o o o o o

o o o o

o o

o o o o o o o

o o o

o o

o o o o

o o o

o

o

o o o o o

o

o

o

o o o o o

o o o o o o

o o o o o

o

o o o o o o o

o

o o o o o

Page 11: FACE Gasoline Fuels with Ethanol By John Orban and ... · FACE Gasoline Fuels with Ethanol By John Orban and Elizabeth Slone, Battelle September 10, 2010 . The selection of ten gasoline

Figure 8. Specific Gravity versus Ethanol with Predicted Values

All Data Estimates/Observed vs. Ethanol

Specific Gravity

0.60 0.62 0.64 0.66 0.68 0.70 0.72 0.74 0.76 0.78

Ethanol (%)

10 20 30 40

A A

B B C C

D

D E

E

F F

G

G

H

H

I I

J J

o o o o

o o

o o o o

o o o o o

o o o o o o o o

o o o o o

o o

o o

o o o o o o

o o o o o o

o o o o o o o o

o o o o o o o o

o o

o o o

o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o

o o o o

o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o

o o o o o o o o o o o

o o o

o o o o o o o o o o

o o

o

o

o o o o

o o o

o o o o o o

o

o

o o o o

o o o o

o o o o o o o o o o o o o

o o o o o o o o o o o o

o o o o o o

API vs. FACE at Ethanol = 0

API

FACE

Specific Gravity

0.54 0.56 0.58 0.60 0.62 0.64 0.66 0.68 0.70 0.72 0.74 0.76 0.78

A B C D E F G H I J

o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o

API Pred. vs. Residuals (15 < Ethanol < 24)

Residual

-0.017

-0.012

-0.007

-0.002

0.003

0.008

0.013

predicted

0.70 0.72 0.74 0.76 0.78

o o o o o

o o o o o o o o o

o

o o o o o

o o o

o o o

o o o o

o o

o o

o o o o o o

o o o o

o o

o o o o

o

o

o o o

o

o

o

o o o o

o o

o

o o o

o o

o o o

o o o o

o o o

o o o o o o o

o o o o o o o o o o o o o o

o o o o o o

o o

o o o o

o o

o o o o o o o o o

o

o o

o o o o

o o o o o

o o

API Pred. vs. Residuals (26 < Ethanol < 35)

Residual

-0.008 -0.006 -0.004 -0.002 0.000 0.002 0.004 0.006 0.008

predicted

0.72 0.74 0.76 0.78

o o

o o o

o

o

o

o

o

o o

o o o

o

o

o

o o o

o

o

o

o o

o

o o o

o

o

o o o

o

o o

o

o

o o o o

o

o o o o o

o o

o

o

o o o o

o

o o o o o o

o o o o o

o

Page 12: FACE Gasoline Fuels with Ethanol By John Orban and ... · FACE Gasoline Fuels with Ethanol By John Orban and Elizabeth Slone, Battelle September 10, 2010 . The selection of ten gasoline

Figure 9. Vapor Pressure versus Ethanol with Predicted Values (Red Letters)

All Data Estimates/Observed vs. Ethanol

Vapor Pressure

6 7 8 9

10 11 12 13 14 15 16

Ethanol (%)

10 20 30 40

A A B B C C D D E E F F G G H H I I J J

o o o o

o o

o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o

o

o o o o o o

o o o o o o o o o o o o

o o o o o o o o

o o o o

o o o o o o

o o

o o o o o o

o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o

o o o o

o o o o o o

o o

o o o o o o

o o o o o o o o

o o o o

o o o o o

o o

o o

o

o o o o o o o o o

o

o o

o

o o o

o o

o

o o

o o

o o

o o o

o

o o o

o o o o o o o o o o o

o o o o o o

o o

o o o

o

o o o

o o o

o

o o

o o o o

API vs. FACE at Ethanol = 0

API

FACE

Vapor Pressure

4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15

A B C D E F G H I J

o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o

API Pred. vs. Residuals (15 < Ethanol < 24)

Residual

-0.6 -0.4 -0.2 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0

predicted

6 8 10 12 14 16

o o o o

o o

o o

o o

o o

o o o o

o o

o o o

o o o o o o o

o o

o o o

o o o o o o o o o

o o

o o

o o o o

o o

o o o o

o o o o

o o

o o o o

o o o o o

o o

o o

o o

o o

o o

o o o o

o o o o

o o

o o

o o o o o o o o

o o o o

o o o o o o

o o

o o

o o o o o o

o o

o o o

o

o o o o

o o o o

o o o

API Pred. vs. Residuals (26 < Ethanol < 35)

Residual

-1.0 -0.8 -0.6 -0.4 -0.2 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8

predicted

6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15

o o

o

o

o

o

o

o

o o o

o o o

o

o

o

o o o o o

o

o

o

o

o

o o

o o

o

o

o o o o

o

o

o

o

o

o o

o o

o

o

o o o o

o o

o o o

o

o o o

o o

o o

o o

o

o o o

Page 13: FACE Gasoline Fuels with Ethanol By John Orban and ... · FACE Gasoline Fuels with Ethanol By John Orban and Elizabeth Slone, Battelle September 10, 2010 . The selection of ten gasoline

Figure 10a. Scatter-plot Matrix for Main Effect FACE Fuel Properties

0

+X

0+ X

0

+X

0+ X

0

+X

0+ X

0+ X

0

+X

0

+

X

0

+X

0

+X

0

+X

0

+X

0

+ X

0

+ X0

+ X0+ X

0+ X

0

+X

0

+X

0

+X

0

+X

0

+X

0

+X

0

+ X0

+X0+X

0+ X

0

+X

0

+X

0 + X0 + X0 + X

0+ X

0 + X0 + X

0+ X

0+ X

0 + X

0+ X

0 + X0 +X0 + X

0+X

0 + X0 +X

0+X

0+ X

0 + X

0+ X

0 + X0 + X0 + X

0+X

0 +X0 +X

0+X

0+X

0 + X

0+ X

0 + X0 + X

0+

X0

+ X

0 + X0 + X0 + X

0+ X

0 + X

0+

X

0 + X0 +X

0+

X0

+X

0 + X0 +X0 +X

0+ X

0 + X

0+

X

0 + X0 + X

0+

X0

+X

0 +X0 +X0 +X

0+X

0 + X

0+

X

0+X0+X

0+X

0+X

0+X 0+X 0+X

0+X

0+X

0+

X

Ethanol

RON

Sensitivity

Aromatics

NParaffins

0 10 20 30

70

80

90

100

70 80 90 100

0

5

10

15

0 5 10 15

0

20

40

0 20 400

10

20

Ethanol: 0 = 0%; + = 20%; X = 30%

Page 14: FACE Gasoline Fuels with Ethanol By John Orban and ... · FACE Gasoline Fuels with Ethanol By John Orban and Elizabeth Slone, Battelle September 10, 2010 . The selection of ten gasoline

Figure 10b. Scatter-plot Matrix for Secondary FACE Fuel Properties

0+

X 0+X

0

+X

0+X

0+

X0

+X0

+X

0

+X

0

+

X

0

+X

0+X

0+X0

+ X0

+X0

+ X0+X0+X

0+ X

0

+ X

0

+ X0

+ X

0+X0

+ X0

+X0

+ X0+X

0+X

0+ X

0

+ X

0

+ X

0

+X

0

+X

0

+ X

0

+X

0

+ X

0

+X

0

+X

0

+ X

0

+ X

0

+ X

0

+ X

0

+X

0

+ X

0

+X

0

+ X

0

+X

0

+X

0

+ X

0

+ X

0

+ X

0

+X

0

+X

0

+X

0

+X

0

+X

0

+X

0

+X

0

+X

0

+X

0

+X

0 +X

0+X

0 +X

0 +X

0 + X0 +X

0 +X0 + X

0 +X

0 + X

0 +X

0 +X

0 +X

0 +X

0 + X0 +X

0 +X0 + X

0 +X

0 + X

0+X

0+X0+

X

0+X

0+X0+X

0+X0+X

0+X

0+X

0+X

0+X

0+X

0+X

0+X0+X

0+X0+X

0+X

0+X

0 +X0+X0 + X

0+X0

+ X

0+X

0+X

0+

X

0 + X

0+

X

0 + X0 +X0 + X

0+X0

+ X

0+X

0+X

0+

X

0 + X

0+

X

0+X0+X0+X

0+X 0+X

0+X

0+X

0+X

0+X

0+X

0+X0+X 0+X

0+X 0

+X

0+X

0+

X

0+X

0+X

0+X

0+X0+X 0+X

0+X0

+X

0+X

0+X

0+

X

0+X

0+X

0

+X

0

+X

0

+ X

0

+X

0

+ X

0

+X

0

+X

0

+X

0

+X

0

+ X

0

+ X

0

+X

0

+ X

0

+X

0

+ X

0

+X

0

+X

0

+X

0

+X

0

+ X

0

+X

0

+X

0

+X

0

+X

0

+X

0

+X

0

+X

0

+X

0

+X

0

+X

0

+X

0

+X

0

+X

0

+X

0

+X

0

+X

0

+X

0

+X

0

+X

0

+X

0

+X

0

+X

0

+X

0

+X

0

+X

0

+X

0

+X

0

+X

0

+X

0

+X

0

+X

0

+X

0

+X

0

+X

0

+X

0

+X

0

+X

0

+X

0

+X

0

+ X

MON

ROAD

T10

T50

T90

SpecificGravity

VaporPressure

70 80 90

70

80

90

100

70 80 90 100

120

140

160

180

120 140 160 180

150

200

250

150 200 250

200

300

400

200 300 400

.5

.6

.7

.8

.5 .6 .7 .8

7

8

9

Ethanol: 0 = 0%; + = 20%; X = 30%

Page 15: FACE Gasoline Fuels with Ethanol By John Orban and ... · FACE Gasoline Fuels with Ethanol By John Orban and Elizabeth Slone, Battelle September 10, 2010 . The selection of ten gasoline

Figure 10c. Scatter-plot Matrix for Main versus Secondary FACE Fuel Properties

0

+

X

0

+

X

0

+

X

0

+

X

0

+

X

0

+

X

0

+

X

0

+

X

0

+

X

0

+

X0

1020

30Et

hano

l

70 75 80 85 90 95MON

0

+

X

0

+

X

0

+

X

0

+

X

0

+

X

0

+

X

0

+

X

0

+

X

0

+

X

0

+

X

010

2030

Etha

nol

70 80 90 100ROAD

0

+

X

0

+

X

0

+

X

0

+

X

0

+

X

0

+

X

0

+

X

0

+

X

0

+

X

0

+

X

010

2030

Etha

nol

130 140 150 160 170 180T10

0

+

X

0

+

X

0

+

X

0

+

X

0

+

X

0

+

X

0

+

X

0

+

X

0

+

X

0

+

X

010

2030

Etha

nol

160 180 200 220 240T50

0

+X

0+X

0

+X

0+ X

0

+X

0+ X

0+ X

0

+X

0

+

X

0

+

X

7080

9010

0R

ON

70 75 80 85 90 95MON

0

+X

0+X

0

+X

0+ X

0

+X

0+ X

0+X

0

+X

0

+

X

0

+

X

7080

9010

0R

ON

70 80 90 100ROAD

0

+X

0+ X

0

+X

0+ X

0

+X

0+ X

0+ X

0

+X

0

+

X

0

+

X

7080

9010

0R

ON

130 140 150 160 170 180T10

0

+X

0+X

0

+X

0+X

0

+X

0+ X

0+X

0

+X

0

+

X

0

+

X

7080

9010

0R

ON

160 180 200 220 240T50

0

+X

0

+X

0

+X

0

+ X

0

+ X0

+ X0

+ X

0

+ X

0

+X

0

+X

05

1015

Sens

itivi

ty

70 75 80 85 90 95MON

0

+X

0

+X

0

+X

0

+ X

0

+ X0

+ X0

+X

0

+ X

0

+X

0

+X

05

1015

Sens

itivi

ty

70 80 90 100ROAD

0

+X

0

+X

0

+X

0

+ X

0

+ X0

+ X0

+ X

0

+ X

0

+X

0

+X

05

1015

Sens

itivi

ty

130 140 150 160 170 180T10

0

+X

0

+X

0

+X

0

+X

0

+ X0

+ X0

+X

0

+X

0

+X

0

+X

05

1015

Sens

itivi

ty

160 180 200 220 240T50

0 + X0 +X0 + X

0+ X

0 + X0 + X

0+

X

0+

X

0 + X

0+ X

010

2030

40Ar

omat

ics

70 75 80 85 90 95MON

0 + X0 +X0 + X

0+ X

0 + X0 + X

0+

X

0+

X

0 + X

0+ X

010

2030

40Ar

omat

ics

70 80 90 100ROAD

0+ X0+ X 0+ X

0+ X

0+ X0+ X

0+

X

0+

X

0+ X

0+X

010

2030

40Ar

omat

ics

130 140 150 160 170 180T10

0+ X0+X 0+ X

0+X

0+ X0+ X

0+

X

0+

X

0+ X

0+X

010

2030

40Ar

omat

ics

160 180 200 220 240T50

0 + X0 +X

0

+X

0+

X

0 + X0 + X0 + X

0+

X

0+ X

0

+X

05

1015

2025

NP

araf

fins

70 75 80 85 90 95MON

0 + X0 +X

0

+X

0+

X

0 + X0 + X0 +X

0+

X

0+ X

0

+X

05

1015

2025

NP

araf

fins

70 80 90 100ROAD

0+ X0+ X

0

+X

0+

X

0+ X 0+ X 0+ X

0+

X

0+ X

0

+X

05

1015

2025

NP

araf

fins

130 140 150 160 170 180T10

0+ X0+X

0

+X

0+

X

0+ X 0+ X 0+X

0+

X

0+ X

0

+X

05

1015

2025

NP

araf

fins

160 180 200 220 240T50

Ethanol: 0 = 0%; + = 20%; X = 30%

Page 16: FACE Gasoline Fuels with Ethanol By John Orban and ... · FACE Gasoline Fuels with Ethanol By John Orban and Elizabeth Slone, Battelle September 10, 2010 . The selection of ten gasoline

Figure 10d. Scatter-plot Matrix for Main versus Secondary FACE Fuel Properties, Continued

0

+

X

0

+

X

0

+

X

0

+

X

0

+

X

0

+

X

0

+

X

0

+

X

0

+

X

0

+

X

010

2030

Eth

anol

200 250 300 350 400T90

0

+

X

0

+

X

0

+

X

0

+

X

0

+

X

0

+

X

0

+

X

0

+

X

0

+

X

0

+

X

010

2030

Eth

anol

.55 .6 .65 .7 .75Specific Gravity

0

+

X

0

+

X

0

+

X

0

+

X

0

+

X

0

+

X

0

+

X

0

+

X

0

+

X

0

+

X

010

2030

Eth

anol

6.5 7 7.5 8 8.5 9Vapor Pressure

0+

X0

+X

0

+X

0+X

0+X

0+X

0+X

0+X

0

+X

0

+X

7080

9010

0R

ON

200 250 300 350 400T90

0+

X0

+ X

0

+X

0+ X

0+ X

0+ X

0+ X

0+ X

0

+X

0

+X

7080

9010

0R

ON

.55 .6 .65 .7 .75Specific Gravity

0+

X0

+X

0

+X

0+X

0+X

0+X

0+X

0+X

0

+X

0

+X

7080

9010

0R

ON

6.5 7 7.5 8 8.5 9Vapor Pressure

0

+X

0

+X

0

+X

0+X

0+X

0+X 0

+X

0+X

0

+X

0

+X

05

1015

Sen

sitiv

ity

200 250 300 350 400T90

0

+X

0

+ X

0

+X

0+ X

0+ X

0+ X0

+ X

0+ X

0

+X

0

+ X0

510

15S

ensi

tivity

.55 .6 .65 .7 .75Specific Gravity

0

+X

0

+X

0

+X

0+X

0+X

0+X0

+X

0+X

0

+X

0

+X

05

1015

Sen

sitiv

ity

6.5 7 7.5 8 8.5 9Vapor Pressure

0+X 0+X 0+X

0+X

0+X 0+X

0+X

0+X

0+X

0+X

010

2030

40A

rom

atic

s

200 250 300 350 400T90

0+X0 + X0 + X

0+ X

0 + X0 + X

0+ X

0+ X

0 + X

0+ X

010

2030

40A

rom

atic

s

.55 .6 .65 .7 .75Specific Gravity

0 +X0 +X0 +X

0+X

0 +X0 +X

0+X

0+X

0 +X

0+X

010

2030

40A

rom

atic

s

6.5 7 7.5 8 8.5 9Vapor Pressure

0+X0+X

0+X 0

+X0+X 0+X 0+X

0+X

0+X

0+X

051

0152

025

NP

araf

fins

200 250 300 350 400T90

0+X0 + X

0+ X0

+ X0 + X0 + X0 + X

0+ X

0 + X

0+ X

051

0152

025

NP

araf

fins

.55 .6 .65 .7 .75Specific Gravity

0 +X0 +X

0+X0

+X0 +X0 +X0 +X

0+X

0 +X

0+X

051

0152

025

NP

araf

fins

6.5 7 7.5 8 8.5 9Vapor Pressure

Ethanol: 0 = 0%; + = 20%; X = 30%

Page 17: FACE Gasoline Fuels with Ethanol By John Orban and ... · FACE Gasoline Fuels with Ethanol By John Orban and Elizabeth Slone, Battelle September 10, 2010 . The selection of ten gasoline

Figure 10e. Scatter-plot Matrix for Main versus Secondary FACE Fuel Properties (Figures 10C and D combined)

0

+

X

0

+

X

0

+

X

0

+

X

0

+

X

0

+

X

0

+

X

0

+

X

0

+

X

0

+

X0

1020

30Et

hano

l

70 75 80 85 90 95MON

0

+

X

0

+

X

0

+

X

0

+

X

0

+

X

0

+

X

0

+

X

0

+

X

0

+

X

0

+

X

010

2030

Etha

nol

70 80 90 100ROAD

0

+

X

0

+

X

0

+

X

0

+

X

0

+

X

0

+

X

0

+

X

0

+

X

0

+

X

0

+

X

010

2030

Etha

nol

130 140 150 160 170 180T10

0

+

X

0

+

X

0

+

X

0

+

X

0

+

X

0

+

X

0

+

X

0

+

X

0

+

X

0

+

X

010

2030

Etha

nol

160 180 200 220 240T50

0

+

X

0

+

X

0

+

X

0

+

X

0

+

X

0

+

X

0

+

X

0

+

X

0

+

X

0

+

X

010

2030

Etha

nol

200 250 300 350 400T90

0

+

X

0

+

X

0

+

X

0

+

X

0

+

X

0

+

X

0

+

X

0

+

X

0

+

X

0

+

X

010

2030

Etha

nol

.55 .6 .65 .7 .75Specific Gravity

0

+

X

0

+

X

0

+

X

0

+

X

0

+

X

0

+

X

0

+

X

0

+

X

0

+

X

0

+

X

010

2030

Etha

nol

6.5 7 7.5 8 8.5 9Vapor Pressure

0

+X

0

+X

0

+

X

0

+X

0

+X

0

+X0

+X

0

+X

0

+

X

0

+

X

7080

9010

0R

ON

70 75 80 85 90 95MON

0

+X

0

+X

0

+

X

0

+X

0

+X

0

+X0

+X

0

+X

0

+

X

0

+

X70

8090

100

RO

N

70 80 90 100ROAD

0

+X

0

+X

0

+

X

0

+X

0

+X

0

+X0

+ X

0

+X

0

+

X

0

+

X

7080

9010

0R

ON

130 140 150 160 170 180T10

0

+X

0

+X

0

+

X

0

+X

0

+X

0

+ X0

+X

0

+X

0

+

X

0

+

X

7080

9010

0R

ON

160 180 200 220 240T50

0

+X

0

+X

0

+

X

0

+X

0

+X

0

+X0

+X

0

+X

0

+

X

0

+

X

7080

9010

0R

ON

200 250 300 350 400T90

0

+X

0

+X

0

+

X

0

+ X

0

+X

0

+ X0

+ X

0

+X

0

+

X

0

+

X

7080

9010

0R

ON

.55 .6 .65 .7 .75Specific Gravity

0

+X

0

+X

0

+

X

0

+X

0

+X

0

+X0

+X

0

+X

0

+

X

0

+

X

7080

9010

0R

ON

6.5 7 7.5 8 8.5 9Vapor Pressure

0

+

X

0

+X

0

+

X

0

+X

0

+X

0

+X0

+X

0

+ X

0

+

X

0

+X

05

1015

Sens

itivi

ty

70 75 80 85 90 95MON

0

+

X

0

+X

0

+

X

0

+X

0

+X

0

+X0

+X

0

+ X

0

+

X

0

+X

05

1015

Sens

itivi

ty

70 80 90 100ROAD

0

+

X

0

+X

0

+

X

0

+X

0

+X

0

+X0

+ X

0

+X

0

+

X

0

+X

05

1015

Sens

itivi

ty

130 140 150 160 170 180T10

0

+

X

0

+X

0

+

X

0

+X

0

+X

0

+ X0

+X

0

+X

0

+

X

0

+X

05

1015

Sens

itivi

ty

160 180 200 220 240T50

0

+

X

0

+X

0

+

X

0

+X

0

+X

0

+X0

+X

0

+X

0

+

X

0

+X

05

1015

Sens

itivi

ty

200 250 300 350 400T90

0

+

X

0

+X

0

+

X

0

+X

0

+X

0

+ X0

+ X

0

+ X

0

+

X

0

+X

05

1015

Sens

itivi

ty

.55 .6 .65 .7 .75Specific Gravity

0

+

X

0

+X

0

+

X

0

+X

0

+X

0

+X0

+X

0

+X

0

+

X

0

+X

05

1015

Sens

itivi

ty

6.5 7 7.5 8 8.5 9Vapor Pressure

0 +X0+X0 + X

0

+X

0 + X0 +X

0

+X

0

+X

0 + X

0+

X

010

2030

40Ar

omat

ics

70 75 80 85 90 95MON

0 + X0 +X0 + X

0

+X

0 + X0 +X

0

+X

0

+X

0 + X

0+

X

010

2030

40Ar

omat

ics

70 80 90 100ROAD

0+X0+X0+X

0

+X

0+X0+X

0

+X

0

+X

0+X

0+X

010

2030

40Ar

omat

ics

130 140 150 160 170 180T10

0+X0+X 0+X

0

+X

0+X0+ X

0

+X

0

+X

0+X

0+X

010

2030

40Ar

omat

ics

160 180 200 220 240T50

0+X0+X 0+X

0

+X

0+X0+X

0

+X

0

+X

0+X

0+X

010

2030

40Ar

omat

ics

200 250 300 350 400T90

0+X0 +X0+X

0

+X

0 + X0 + X

0

+X

0

+X

0+X

0+

X

010

2030

40Ar

omat

ics

.55 .6 .65 .7 .75Specific Gravity

0 +X0 +X0 +X

0

+X

0 +X0 +X

0

+X

0

+X

0 +X

0+

X

010

2030

40Ar

omat

ics

6.5 7 7.5 8 8.5 9Vapor Pressure

0+X

0+X

0

+X

0

+X

0+ X0 +X0 +X

0

+X

0+ X

0

+X

05

1015

2025

NPa

raffi

ns

70 75 80 85 90 95MON

0+ X

0+X

0

+X

0

+X

0+ X0 +X0 +X

0

+X

0+ X

0

+X

05

1015

2025

NPa

raffi

ns

70 80 90 100ROAD

0+X

0+X

0

+X

0

+X

0+X 0+X 0+ X

0

+X

0+X

0

+X

05

1015

2025

NPa

raffi

ns

130 140 150 160 170 180T10

0+X

0+X

0

+X

0

+X

0+X 0+ X 0+X

0

+X

0+X

0

+X

05

1015

2025

NPa

raffi

ns

160 180 200 220 240T50

0+X

0+X

0

+X

0

+X

0+X 0+X 0+X

0

+X

0+X

0

+X

05

1015

2025

NPa

raffi

ns

200 250 300 350 400T90

0+X

0+X

0

+X

0

+X

0+ X0 + X0 + X

0

+X

0+X

0

+X

05

1015

2025

NPa

raffi

ns

.55 .6 .65 .7 .75Specific Gravity

0+X

0+X

0

+X

0

+X

0+X0 +X0 +X

0

+X

0+X

0

+X

05

1015

2025

NPa

raffi

ns

6.5 7 7.5 8 8.5 9Vapor Pressure

Ethanol: 0 = 0%; + = 20%; X = 30%

Page 18: FACE Gasoline Fuels with Ethanol By John Orban and ... · FACE Gasoline Fuels with Ethanol By John Orban and Elizabeth Slone, Battelle September 10, 2010 . The selection of ten gasoline

Figure 11. Three-Dimensional Plot for Main Fuel Properties