Upload
anirudh-chaiworaporn
View
188
Download
9
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Citation preview
Cardboard Bumper Assembly Jig for the NISH AbilityOne Design Challenge
Client: Specialized Training for Adult Rehabilitation
Semester: Fall 2011Ref: SEC F11-75-NISH
Team Members:Ben Blair, MEJohn Hughey, CpEJordan John, ME (PM)Linden Eason, EE
1 | P a g e
8 November 2011
Specialized Training for Adult RehabilitationAttn: Kathy Baumann, Executive DirectorP.O. BOX 93820 North 13th StreetMurphysboro, Illinois 62966
Dear Mrs. Baumann,
The letter is in response to your request for proposal for the NISH AbilityOne Design Network Challenge. Our team, SEC Team 75, has developed a cardboard banding jig designed for production and completion of cardboard bumper systems through START and its subsidiaries. Further, we believe that our design will not only increase production numbers dramatically, but will help to aid and assist the operator of said jig.
This proposal is based on simple, clean, and efficient incorporation of electronic and mechanical systems. The goal of this design is to be able to create cardboard bumpers rapidly and easily through the use of racking, clamping, and counting assemblies. Overall, START is producing approximately 1200 units per week while their demand from their current subsidiary is 4000 (Please see Appendix A). We hope to exceed this projected number through our jig.
Finally, SEC Team 75 would like to thank you for the opportunity to submit a design proposal to your company and we hope to hear from you soon.
Sincerely,
Jordan JohnProject Manager – Team 75Saluki Engineering [email protected](618) 303-0975
2 | P a g e
Executive Summary
The Saluki Engineering Company in collaboration with the Institute for Economic
Empowerment has put out a request for proposal that states, “Client wants a device or a
system that will solve a real workplace problem for at least one group of severely
handicapped workers.” The goal is to design a cardboard bumper assembly jig. The
design will be simple, efficient, and cost effective. The approach to this request is a
multifaceted design that will increase ease of assembly as well as increase production
rates by a projected 233.33%.
The project will consist of an electrical and mechanical subassembly working
together to create an overall project. The assembly will consist of the following:
The mechanical system will be a racking and clamping system. The rack will be a
plate that will be supported by rigid rectangular shafts. As the cardboard pieces are fed
into the rack, the electrical system will allow for the user to know if the system is under
filled, filled, or overfilled through the use of LED indicators. These indicators will be
housed and attached to the racking system and controlled by a microcontroller. Once the
rack is filled, the clamping system will swing downward and hold the pieces together
allowing the operator to band the cardboard slivers.
The final design of said project will conclude in early April with a detailed design
report submitted by April 19th, 2012. The estimated cost of the final design will be $248.
3 | P a g e
Non-Disclosure Information
The information provided in or for this proposal is the confidential, proprietary property
of the Saluki Engineering Company of Carbondale, Illinois, USA. Such information may be used
solely by the party to whom the proposal has been submitted by the Saluki Engineering
Company and solely for the purpose of evaluating this proposal. The submittal of this proposal
confers no right in, or license to use, or right to disclose to others for any purpose, the subject
matter, or such information or data, nor confers the right to reproduce or offer such information
for sale. All drawings, specifications, and other writings supplied with this proposal are to be
returned to Saluki Engineering Company promptly upon request. The use of this information,
other than for the purpose of evaluating this proposal, is subject to the terms of agreement under
which services are to be performed pursuant to this proposal.
4 | P a g e
Table of Contents
Transmittal Letter (JJ)……………………………………………………………………………..2
Executive Summary (LE)..………..………………………………………………………………3
Nondisclosure Statement……………………………………………………...…………………..4
Table of Contents………………………………………………………………………………….5
List of Tables and Figures…………………………………………………………………………6
Introduction (JH)...……….………………………....………………………………………..……7
Literature Review (All, Revised by BB)…………. ……....………………………..………..……8
Project Description (JJ).……………………………………………………………………….…18
Project Specifications (JJ).…...……………………………………………………………..……20
Design Basis (JJ)…....……………………………………………………………………………20
Project Organization (JJ).…...……………………………………………..………………..……21
Scope of Work (JJ)……………………………………………………………………………….21
Subsystem Design………………………………………………………………………………..22
Clamping System (BB)……………….…………………………………………………….22
Racking System (JJ)…………………....…………………..………………………………23
Power Source (LE)…………………...…………………………………………………….26
Control Circuit (JH)……………..…….…………………………………………………....27
Microcontroller (JH)……..…………...…………………………………………………….28
Sensors (JH)………………………….……………………………………………………..30
LEDs (LE)…………………………….……………………………………………………32
Ventilation and Filters (LE)…………….…………………………………………………..33
Training Aids (JH, LE)………………….………………………………………………….34
Material Selection (BB)…....………………………………………………………………….…34
Action Item List (All)……...………………………………………………………………….…35
Draft Schedule (JJ)…..…………………………………………………………………………...36
Resources Needed (JJ, JH)…………………………………………………………………….…37
List of Analysis (All)…………………………………………………………………………….37
Works Cited……………………………………………………………………………………...39
Appendix A: Communications……..……………………………………………………………41
Appendix B: RFP Documents…………………………………………………………………....42
Appendix C: 3-D Renderings of Mechanical System (JJ)…………………………….…………50
Appendix D: Microcontroller Wiring Diagram…...…………………………………..…………53
Appendix E: Resumes……………………………………………………………………………54
5 | P a g e
List of Tables and Figures
FiguresFigure 1: Cardboard Bumper Picture…………………………………………………………….11
Figure 2: Jig Design………………..…………………………………………………………….13
Figure 3: Cost of Binding Machine..…………………………………………………………….14
Figure 4: Banding Machine…….………………………………………………………………..15
Figure 5: Shirt Press……....…….………………………………………………………………..17
Figure 6: Block Diagram………………..…………….…………………………………………19
Figure 7: Supports………………………………………………………………………………..24
Figure 8: Racking Plate………………………………………………………………………..…25
Figure 9: Draft Assembly……………………………………………………………………...…26
Figure 10: Circuit Logic Diagram………………………………………………………………..27
Figure 11: Pin Assignment Diagram…………………………………………………………..…28
Figure 12: Microcontroller Wiring Diagram……………………………..…………..………….30
Figure 13: Sensor Placement Diagram………………………………………………..…………31
Figure 14: Sample LED……………………………………………………………….…………32
Figure 15: LED Setup…………………………………………………………………..………..33
TablesTable 1: Production Rates………………………………………………………………………....8
Table 2: Project Specifications………………..…………………………………………………20
Table 3: Basis of Design…………………………………………………………………………20
Table 4: Organizational Chart………………………….………………………………………...21
Table 5: Material Selection Matrix………………………………………………………………34
Table 6: Action Item List……………………………….………………………………………..35
Table 7: Proposed Schedule…………………………….………………………………………..36
Table 8: Resources Needed………………………………………………………………………37
6 | P a g e
Introduction
In the early 1960’s a movement began; A movement that would finally allow those with
severe handicaps, mental and physical alike, to no longer feel ostracized in the workplace. This
movement, known as the Disability Rights Movement, would lead to numerous national
organizations aimed to aid those with handicaps to find work and succeed in industry. One of the
organizations formed during these trying times was the National Institute for the Severely
Handicapped (NISH).
Through the years, NISH has developed into an international organization helping
hundreds of thousands people find work despite their handicaps. One of the biggest challenges
NISH has encountered is being able to place clients in to work that has numerous restrictions.
These restrictions are often based on ergonomics and movement controlled assembly. Because of
this, NISH has developed the AbilityOne Network Challenge.
The NISH AbilityOne Network Challenge sponsors competition throughout the nation
aimed at the design and manufacturing of “enabling devices”. These devices seek to aid those
with handicaps to perform complex tasks easily. In other words, these devices create a solution
to problems affecting those with handicaps in the workplace.
Specialized Training for Adult Rehabilitation (START), a NPO based out of
Murphysboro, Illinois that is a subsidiary of NISH. START has in house facilities in which they
employ individuals with handicaps. One of their current projects is creating cardboard bumpers
that are used by local companies for shipping and packing. Currently, they are able to produce
1200 units per week. Their current client has increased their demand to 4000 units per week.
7 | P a g e
Through the development of an assistive jig, SEC Team 75 hopes to expedite their current
assembly process to meet this demand.
Current Production Requested Production Increase Needed1200 units 4000 units 2800 units (233.33%)
Table 1: Production Rates
As table 1 shows, the increase needed to reach the goals set by START’s client is around
2800 units, or 233.33%. The concept of this design includes a jig in which they will be able to
rack, clamp, and count cardboard pieces allowing faster wrapping and assembly of cardboard
bumpers.
Literature Review
The American Heritage Stedman’s Medical Dictionary defines handicap as a physical,
mental, or emotional condition that interferes with ones normal functioning [1]. When most
people think of the word handicap, they instantly envision someone in a wheelchair; however,
there are other disabilities such as being hearing impaired, having a long term illness, a brain
injury, or even intellectual disabilities just to name a few.
The 2010 census reports that in the United States as a whole, around twelve percent of
the population, nearly thirty-six million people have some level of disability. Individuals who
suffer from disabilities have reported difficulties in obtaining jobs, keeping a job once obtained,
and performing job duties. The average employment rate of disabled citizens across the United
States is a paltry 33.4 percent [2].
NISH, the National Institute for the Severely Handicapped, is an organization that is
focused on helping people with disabilities gain employment. NISH’s mission is “Create
8 | P a g e
employment opportunities for people with significant disabilities.” [3] NISH been helping
handicapped people since 1974. NISH is affiliated with the AbilityOne program. The AbilityOne
program is composed of 600 nonprofit organizations across the United States. One of these
organizations is START in Murphysboro. These organizations are dedicated to providing work
to disabled people and providing them income. They work toward finding jobs for people with
all types of disabilities, from the blind to those with mental disabilities like autism. The
AbilityOne network currently employees around 47,000 people, making them the largest
employer of disabled people in the United States. [3]
Every year NISH supports a competition called the AbilityOne Design Challenge. In this
competition students are encourage to make something that can assist people with disabilities in
their everyday careers. These designs are required to help make their daily task easier. The teams
must registered by the 20th of April. In their entry each group must submit a final report with full
details of their design, as well as a video of their design in use.
These designs are put though strict judging criteria. These criteria are based on a series of
questions.
“• Is the assistive technology device/system a solution to a barrier
that prevents a person with a significant disability from entering or
advancing in the workplace? If the answer is “No”, the submission
will not be reviewed further and will be considered to be out of contention.
• Was a prototype built? If the answer is “No”, the submission will not
9 | P a g e
be reviewed further and will be considered to be out of contention.
• Was the device/system designed in collaboration with a person who
has a disability? If the answer is “No”, the submission will not be
reviewed further and will be considered to be out of contention.
• Is the device/system currently being used or intended for use?
by the end of the current school year? Additional consideration
is given to those devices that are in use.
• Was the design developed with consultation from a NISH affiliated
NPA? Additional consideration is given to those that worked with a NISH affiliate.” [5]
The final results depend on how well each group answers the questions above, as well as
a few additional things such as safety and overall ease of use. The better the design solves a
problem but at the same time meets these judging criteria the more highly rated the entry will
place in the competition.
Workforce Concerns
The closest organization in the AbilityOne network is Specialized Training for Adult
Rehabilitation Inc., also known as S.T.A.R.T. This not-for profit organization has been around
since 1969. The S.T.A.R.T. program caters to disabled adults by offering six different
rehabilitation programs that serve over one hundred and fifty, not limited to just working
opportunities. The organization had very humble beginnings, when it was first founded it
10 | P a g e
operated out of a church basement. Now the program utilizes over thirty-six thousand square feet
of space for its programs [6]. “Work opportunities include mobile custodial crews,
subcontracting services for area businesses, janitorial services at the rest area on Interstate 57,
and state of the art microfilming and digital scanning services.” [6]
Current System and Proposed Design
The S.T.A.R.T. factory in Murphysboro currently uses a binding system that workers use
to double-bind stacks of cardboard strips. This system relies heavily on the use of human labor,
because the current system calls for the stack to be manually counted, stack, held, and bound.
These stacks of cardboard strips are used as packing bumpers by Penn Aluminum. Penn
Aluminum uses the bumpers to pack and protect the products they send out on a daily basis.
Penn has been a long-time contractor with S.T.A.R.T., starting nearly fifteen years ago, and
S.T.A.R.T has been producing these bumpers for them nearly the same amount of time.
Figure 1: Cardboard bumper
11 | P a g e
Recently, Penn has led S.T.A.R.T. to increase the production of bumpers per month to double
what their current production rate is at making the current quota nearly 4000 bumpers a month.
While S.T.A.R.T. has been able to slightly increase their production of the bumpers, they are not
able to fully meet the demand at this point. With a slight amount of simple adjustments the
productivity will be able to be increased to meet demands set forth by the client.
To make the bumpers, employees currently hand count out 15 pieces of cardboard of a set
length and width. Then they hold the cardboard pieces together and wrap them in tape on both
ends, producing the cardboard bumpers. One problem is that it takes a lot of motor skills to hold
all 15 pieces together while wrapping the bumper with tape that is dispensed from a wet tape
machine. This causes production to be slow because many of the disabled people that work at
START have disabilities that limit their motor skills. When our team visited the factory during
production hours they noticed that even though S.T.A.R.T. has two tape dispensers, they are
unable to use them because there is only one worker per shift with the necessary motor skills to
hold the cardboard bundle while simultaneously cranking out a length of tape and then wrapping
the tape around the cardboard.
12 | P a g e
Figure 2: Jig Design
As seen in Figure 2 above one idea on how to assist the operator is to include a jig device
to hold the cardboard stacks in place as the operator binds the stack. Another idea is to build a
system that allows the pieces to be held, much like the clamping system above, but also to rotate
to ease the process of wrapping the band around the unit.
While a system that uses mechanical components to lessen the amount of dexterity
required to perform the task is great, a completely autonomous system is not what we are striving
for. The whole reason S.T.A.R.T. exists is to help people with disabilities find work. Rather than
creating an expensive machine to do the task for them, we are striving to make an efficient,
13 | P a g e
affordable, and easy to use mechanism to assist the process. The plan is to incorporate
electronics into the design via sensors and possible electro mechanics, but due to the nature of
S.T.A.R.T the design must not be a financial burden on them, therefore target unit cost is
between two and five hundred dollars. Most automatic banding units cost over one thousand
dollars, with high-end units selling for nearly ten thousand dollars.
Model Cost
Pac SM65 Arch Strapping Machine $9986
Signode TABLE-TYER Plastic Strapping Machine $2566
Signode 430999 Power Strapping Machine $1082
Figure 3: Cost of Binding Machines
The current tape dispenser system looks much like the machine in figure 4 below.
S.T.A.R.T. had considered helping to make the job easier by buying automatic tape dispensers,
but even those units were much too expensive. By utilize the existing units in the design, since
they have proven reliable and the employees are used to using them, the total cost of the design
may to be reduced.
14 | P a g e
Figure 4: Banding Machine [7]
The way the strips are stacked is a major point that could be improved. By
decreasing the time required to count out the strips and then arrange them in a neat row could
significantly increase daily output of the cardboard bumpers. The amount of time that is takes to
make count the bumpers and stack them is close to 2 minutes.
To make the job of counting the strips easier, the idea to using sensors to detect when the
correct number of cardboard strips have been placed into the machine. The most cost-effective
option seems to be using an infra-red sensor and connecting it to a microcontroller inside the
unit. Infra-red sensors are widely used in robotics and are fairly cheap and easy to maintain most
costing roughly $25-$100 [8].
15 | P a g e
There are a couple different ways to program the sensor. The first way, and probably the
easiest is to program the sensor to count each strip as it is loaded into the holding tray. When the
sensor has counted the correct number of cardboard strips, a green LED will light up on the unit
and the employee will know that it is time to activate the holding system and wrap the tape
around the bundle.
The second way to program the sensor would be to make it so that the green LED lights
up after the cardboard reaches a certain height. The microcontroller for the unit will also be fairly
inexpensive and will probably be the best option to handle the input from the sensor
A third way is measure the weight of the stack and allowing the sensor to engage between
a certain tolerances, which would again activate a green stating the jig is full. Included in all of
these would be a red light that allows the user to know when the jig is overfilled.
After looking at various competing systems, both in terms of binding and in terms of tape
dispensing, none of the other products seem to be near to what is needed by S.T.A.R.T., and if a
product is similar to a possible desired component design it is out of the price range that an
organization like S.T.A.R.T. could afford.
The option of a stacking system could also speed up the bumper production process. A
patent for a device that is used to stack fanfold paper was fold and reviewed. Creating a system
similar to this device will be of benefit to S.T.A.R.T. This design is a very good design because
of its simplicity. It uses very few moving parts and is fairly inexpensive [9]. The design allows
sheets to slide down a chute that only allows the sheets to fall flat on the bottom of a tank that
holds all of the paper. A problem may arise in the case when the cardboard trying to be stacked
may not fall flat. This is a very small flaw though, since employees could easily reach in and fix
16 | P a g e
the problem. The design allows stacks to be made easily, by a simple process. This is ideal for
the design that can be used by the S.T.A.R.T. facility because the simplicity means it can be
easily used and taught to the employees.
The problem with the design mentioned above is that a hopper system would need to be
included to render the stacking system improvement. Due to the size of the cardboard strips,
11x2x.25 inches, a hopper that would hold a considerable amount of cardboard strips that would
allow steady production would have to be of substantial size. This depending on S.T.A.R.T.’s
work space may cause a problem by consuming to large of area making it impractical in
S.T.A.R.T’s limited workspace for this project which is 15x8.
The Last component the design could include is a clamping device. Since one of the
largest problems in production is the holding of the cardboard in place, a clamp may be put in
place to hold the stack steady in a jig while being bound. The clamp would resemble something
that is used in presses, with a handle the must be pulled down to lock in place until released. A
shirt press like seen in figure 5 below contains a sample clamp that would apply pressure on the
stack in the jig.
17 | P a g e
Figure 5: Shirt Press [10]
The biggest considerations for the design are as follows. First, is ease of use? Since the
competition is focus on simplicity, but more importantly the S.T. A.R.T. facility is focused
toward providing jobs that mental disabled employees can accomplish. So the easier the design
can be taught and used the more useful the final product will be. The second thing is the cost of
the design. Since S.T.A.R.T. has limited funding the cost of the system must not place them in a
finical burden. Ultimately these constraints will determine which of the above options for design
will be able to be included in an effective manner.
Project Description
Team 75’s objective is to create a device that will assist the racking, holding, and banding
of cardboard bumpers. The basis of this design is to create a base racking system. As the operator
fills this racking system, three LED indicators will give insight on how full the jig is. The LED’s
will light up as the sensors indicate capacity either by means of a microcontroller or logic circuit.
The first LED will allow the user to know the jig is not filled full, but is actively powered. The
second will tell the operator the jig is at proper capacity (15 cardboard slivers). The last will tell
the operator the jig is over capacity. Once the jig is properly filled, a swing clamp will come
down and apply pressure to the bunch. Once this is done, the operator can then band the bumper
and production is complete. By speeding the counting process and assisting with holding while
banding, the operator will be able to speed production time and will also see an ease in doing so.
The organization of this jig is seen in figure 6.
18 | P a g e
Figure 6: Block Diagram
Currently, the process is done completely by hand. Therefore, any implementation of
assistance will increase production. The current production rate is around 1200 units per week.
This figure is gathered during final shipment each week to the company they create the bumpers
for. The design team for this project has also confirmed these numbers by video taping
production and scaling the timing over the weekly hours. Overall, we are hoping to increase
production from 1200 units to 4000+ allowing not only the client’s demands to be met, but an
increase in salary for the operators. Currently, they are paid on a by-piece basis, so, if we are able
to speed units produced, we will also be able to help the operator make more during a shift. Our
final production rates will be calculated in the same manner, by averaging a piece-by-piece
production time through video taping and scaling this over the weekly hours.
19 | P a g e
Carboard Banding System
Electrical System AC to DC Power Supply
Arduino Uno Microcontroller or Logic Circuit
Overflow LED
Fill LED
Underflow LED
Fill Sensor
Overflow Sensor
Ventilation and Filters
Mechanical System Feed (Counting) Racking
MechanismClamping
Mechanism Taping
Project Specifications
Project Specifications
Size 2'x2'x2'Weight <20lbs
Cost <250Productivity Rate 60 bumpers per hourOperating Force 10lbf (projected)
Microcontroller Voltage Requirement ~8V
Table 2: Project Specifications
Design Basis
Documents DateRequest for Proposal 9-Sep-11SEC RFP Project Definition 9-Sep-11SEC RFP List of Deliverables 9-Sep-11Draft Proposal 8-Nov-11Final Proposal* 8-Dec-11End of Proposal Memo 8-Dec-11Progress Report 23-Feb-12Design Report 19-Apr-12Notebooks and End of Project Memo 5-May-12
Table 3: Basis of Design (Please see appendix B for home documents)
*Final Proposal overrules any statements made in the draft proposal
Project Organization
20 | P a g e
Table 4: Organizational Chart
Scope of Work
List of Deliverables as Required Literature Review Technical description of all work done for every solution Equipment, component, and materials take-off lists and costs for each solution Technical Drawings Selected solution with Pugh chart Technical description of recommended system and how it works Summary of lab tests and analysis performed relevant to solution Complete specification including all drawings necessary for production and installation
as well as repair Complete list of components and signal processes Table of performance data Technical list of problems and limitations derived during design and testing Analysis of electromagnetic compatibility including coding Fault analysis Technical Manual Users Guide Conclusion and recommendation section Estimated cost of production Timeline to construct, build, or manufacture
21 | P a g e
Project Manager:Jordan John (ME)Responsibilities:
3-D Rendering/Material Selection/Racking System
John Hughey (CpE)Responsibilities:
Programming/Software Mapping and Integration
Linden Eason (EE)Responsibilities:
Electrical Wiring and Integration/Harness Wiring
and Integration
Ben BlairResponsibilities:
Material Selection/Clamping System/Fabrication
Appendix
Subsystem Designs
Clamping System
Summary of Components
Clamping device
Lever Pressure applying plate Jig Mounting Unit
List of Deliverables
Clamping Prototype Analysis of maximum force needed on handle Analysis of mechanical advantage Analysis of minimum pressure needed for plate clamping 3-D Renderings
Due to the current problem that S.T.A.R.T. has with holding the bumper stacks while
taping them together, the use of a clamp will be included in the design. The clamp’s purpose is to
apply pressure to the stack so that it the stack will be firmly held in place in the jig.
The clamp does not need to apply a lot of force, only enough to keep the stack solid
seated in the jig. The clamp will resemble that of a shirt press machine. It will have a handle that
extends forward that the employee will be able to pull down with minimal force to apply the
pressure of the clamp. The clamp will be composed of a four bar mechanism which when the
force of the lever is applied the four bar mechanism will move until weigh is over center causing
the mechanism to lock in place. To release the mechanism the level will need to be lifted to
allow the center of mass to return to its original position. The length of the handle will be
22 | P a g e
determined to allow the greatest mechanical advantage so it can be used by all employee’s at
START.
Racking System
Summary of Components
Rack Jig
Supports Racking Plate Assembly Sensor Housing
List of Deliverables
Racking Prototype Analysis of proper sensor placement Analysis of maximum force applied on supports Analysis of tolerance through system Analysis of clamping attachment placement 3-D Renderings
The basis of the rack design will be a support set with a plate assembly mounted on the
inside of the supports. Along the back support, the clamping device will be mounted. First, for an
ease of visualization, please refer to appendix C. Appendix C has drawings that show the
proposed design on a drafted model. These drawings were made by using AutoDesk Inventor
2010.
The supports of the racking system will be made from steel rectangular tubes. The left
and right will be identical with drilled holes through the body of each to mount the plate
assembly. The back tube will be longer to allow the clamping device to be attached. As
proposed, the left, right, and back tubes will be cut to 12”, 12”, and 14” respectively. Again, this
is just a drafted model and said measurements can change.
23 | P a g e
Figure 7: Supports
Next, the rack assembly will be mounted within the thresholds of the supports. This is
where the operator will put the cardboard slivers into the rack allowing the operator to work
hands free during this process. The plate will be cut to 11.5” W by 2” deep. The height of the
rack will be anywhere from 4.5” to 6.5” depending on the final design.
24 | P a g e
Figure 8: Racking Plate
The rack will also be home to the clamping assembly. As seen in the appendices, a
proposed clamping assembly will attach to the rear support shaft and swing downwards into the
rack allowing pressure to be applied to the stack of cardboard slivers. This design will have to be
prototyped once force analysis is done on the clamping system.
Finally, the sensor placement has yet to be determined. Because of the nature of sensors
and how they react to different reflections of materials, direct sensor placement will derive from
adequate testing and analysis allowing for the precise placement. This analysis will be mostly
based on where exactly the sensor will be most accurate. By finding a position along the frame in
which the sensor can function normally and without interference, we will be able to make the
overall system more accurate. Interference can be a result from many things (magnetic fields,
25 | P a g e
reflective properties of the metals used, “noise”, etc.) so the placement will be determined during
our analysis and testing phases.
All subassemblies of the rack system will be attached with fasteners of 1/4” diameter and
varying lengths. Some will be direct carriage style bolts; some will be counter bored screws
allowing for flush design. The assembly will appear similar to the following:
Figure 9: Draft Assembly
Power Source
Summary of Components Power Source
List of Deliverables
Functioning power source
26 | P a g e
Analysis of output power
The most important item to complete the electrical sub-system is the power source. The
microcontroller can be operated within a voltage range of six volts to twenty volts but operates
optimally between seven volts and twelve volts and uses a wall power adapter. The wall power
adapter chosen to power the selected microcontroller has an output of nine volts.
Control Circuit
Summary of Components 2 to 4 demultiplexer Breadboard Power Supply
List of Deliverables Working prototype Stress tests for components
The individual inputs from the sensors will need to be processed in order for the correct
LED to light up. While we had originally planned to use an Arduino for this purpose, a physical
circuit will be cheaper to build and maintain. The physical circuit should also be more durable.
The circuit will follow a simple logic pattern (see appendix D).
Figure 10: Circuit Logic Diagram
27 | P a g e
As the above figure shows, the circuit will have four states. State 00 (neither sensor
detects cardboard) will light up the green LED to tell the operator to fill the jig. State 01 (overfill
sensor off, fill sensor on) will light up the yellow LED to tell the operator that the jig is full. State
11 (overfill sensor on, fill sensor on) will light up the red LED to let the operator know the jig is
too full. State 10 (overfill sensor on, fill sensor off) will be used as a simple form of error
detection and will light up all three LEDs as red. Since we have 2 inputs and 4 outputs it is
necessary to use a 2-to-4 demultiplexer to handle the logic. A demultiplexer uses several AND
gates to take a small number of inputs and translate them into a greater number of outputs. The
pin assignment diagram for the demultiplexer is as follows (Also in appendix D):
Figure 11: Pin Assignment Diagram
Microcontroller
Summary of Components Microcontroller
28 | P a g e
List of Deliverables
Working prototype Documented C code structure
The individual inputs from the sensors will need to be processed in order for the correct
LED to light up. While this could be done using a physical circuit, the amount of data
transmitted by the sensors that would then need to be transmitted to the LEDs makes using a
physical circuit a poor option. Since power is required to operate the sensors and LEDs, it is a
small step to incorporate a microcontroller into the design. The microcontroller that fits our
design the based is part of the Arduino series of microcontrollers. These microcontrollers are
based on an open source platform that allows for easy development. The wiring diagram for the
sensors we plan to use is as follows (Also in appendix D):
29 | P a g e
Figure 12: Microcontroller Wiring Diagram [11]
To connect the LEDs to the microcontroller, it will be necessary to use a 330 Ohm
resistor in series with each LED to prevent them from burning out. The microcontroller will need
to be programmed to handle the sensor inputs and convert them into the proper outputs for the
LED indicators. Arduino microcontrollers can be programmed in C, which is fortunately one of
the most wide-spread programming languages. The C language is very versatile, which is
fortunate since it allows the programmer to develop custom functions through which to run
inputs and outputs. This allows the code for the microcontroller to be minimal.
Sensors
Summary of Components IR Photosensors
List of Deliverables Report of sensor placement on the jig Report of sensor placement angles Functional prototype Analysis of sensor accuracy
30 | P a g e
Figure 13: Sensor Placement Diagram
Based on the project design, two sensors are needed. The term “sensor(s)” as used in this
subsection refers to both parts of the sensor unit, the emitter and the receiver. The first sensor
will be placed 4.25 inches above the base of the jig. This sensor will return a “low” value when it
detects under-fill and return a “high” value when the jig is full, indicating the correct number of
cardboard strips have been inserted. The second sensor will be placed .25 inches above the
under-fill sensor, and will be utilized to prevent over-fill of the jig, returning a “high” value
when the jig is not over-filled and a “low” value when the jig is over-filled. The over-fill
indicator is necessary in the event that an employee loads too many strips into the jig, going over
the specified amount of cardboard strips. This can easily happen due to the need for an increased
production rate of nearly four hundred percent as requested by the contract holder for the
cardboard bumper project (see appendix A). The biggest concern when selecting which sensor to
utilize is the range which the sensor produces accurate measurements. Another concern when
selecting the sensor is the level of background noise produced by ambient light. In order to
produce a final product that maximizes cost effectiveness and fits within size specifications,
photo sensors that work off the infrared spectrum of light will be implemented. The sensor works
31 | P a g e
based on an LED that sends infrared light into the jig that will then be reflected into the photo
sensor when the cardboard strips reach the required height.
Indicator LEDs
Summary of Components:
Green LED (power on) Yellow LED (capacity) Red LED (over capacity)
List of Deliverables: Analysis of viewing placement of LEDs Analysis of LED placement on rack Analysis LEDs colors and brightness Functioning indicator system
Figure 14: Sample LED [12]
Once the photo sensors are inserted in the proper place, the use of red-green-blue light
emitting diodes (RGB LEDs) will be used to indicate the states of the cardboard strips placed in
the jig. A system of three LEDs will be used to specify if the jig has enough cardboard strips to
continue with the binding process. The first of the three LEDs will light up green and stay lit
most of the time to inform the employee operating the jig to keep inserting material. The second
LED will light up yellow once the jig is filled to correct height, which in this design is measure
at 4.25 inches. The third and final LED will light up red as fail safe to notify the operator that the
machine is over-filled, which will be measured at 4.5 inches and strips must be removed until the
32 | P a g e
second LED displays yellow. Although one RGB LED is able to produce multiple colors, the
decision to go with three separate diodes was to take into account any employees that may have
problems distinguishing color. Therefore, the LEDs will be placed in an adjacent vertical
position so that the LEDs can mimic the fill process with the bottom light meaning fill, the
middle light meaning stop and the top light meaning over fill. This is shown below:
Figure 15
: LED Setup
Ventilation and Filter
Summary of Components:
Fan Exhaust Vents Housing
List of Deliverables: Diagram of electrical sub-system placement Analysis of filters efficiency Analysis of airflow and operating temperatures Analysis of exhaust vent placement Functioning cooling and protective layout
The other electrical sub-systems will need to be enclosed within a case to protect them
from any damage due to the working environment. The goal is to make this case rugged and
breathable with a light weight material. The design include two exhaust vents and a fan that will
be used to give the parts better air flow and keep internal temperature at or slightly below room
33 | P a g e
temperature (approximately 72°F). One of the exhaust vents will be placed facing away from the
jig while the other facing the side as intake. A filter will be placed inside of the exhaust vent for
intake to prevent any dust entering the case and causing damage to the parts inside. The type of
fan, filter and even vent placement has not been completely determined until we have complete
analysis of airflow and the operating temperatures produced by the other electrical sub-systems.
Training Aids
Summary of Components: Training media for employees Training Manuals
List of Deliverables: Training media for employees Documentation of all subsystems for START to use if maintenance is needed
In order for both current and future employees of the START facility to use the prototype,
training materials will need to be designed. The directors of the facility will need to be
interviewed to determine the most effective training materials currently in use at the facility so
that the materials provided for this product are as effective as possible. Possible training
mediums include training videos, training manuals, and posters with helpful reminders.
Regardless of the medium used, the training materials will provide a step-by-step walkthrough of
the operation of the jig. A manual will also be provided to the directors of the START facility in
order for them to have full documentation of the components used. Included in this manual will
be instructions for basic maintenance.
Material Selection
Material type Yield Strength Density Cost Overall rating
34 | P a g e
(MPa) (lb/in^3) ($/ton)ASTM A681 (Steel) 380 0.282 1000 8.6
AISI 1020 (Steel) 350 0.284 3000 5.5Al 2024 (Aluminum) 324 0.1 2100 7.2Al 5052 (Aluminum) 228 0.097 1000 8.5
Table 5: Material Selection Matrix
From this material selection matrix, it can be seen that a steel subsidiary is the best choice
for cost effectiveness in this application. The steel will be a common carbon steel, like ASTM
A81 and AISI 1020 as shown in the matrix, that can be bought at a local hardware store.
Action Item List
# Activity Person Assigned Due Status Comments1 Order Electrical Parts JH 11/16/11 11/22/11 50%
2 Purchase Mechanical Parts
JJ 11/16/11 1/17/12 0%
3 Begin testing and analysis of AC Power
LE 11/16/11 1/24/12 0%
4 Begin Racking System Base Build
JJ 11/16/11 1/24/12 0%
5 Begin Programming Infared Sensors
JH 11/16/11 1/24/12 0%
6 Begin Programming Simple Logic Controller
JH 11/16/11 1/24/12 0%
7 Begin Programming Arduino Microcontroller
JH 11/16/11 1/31/12 0%
8 Begin Sensor Placement Analysis
JH/LE 11/16/11 1/31/12 0%
9 Finalize LED Placement LE 11/16/11 2/7/12 0%
10 Begin Clamping Mechanism Design
BB 11/16/11 2/7/12 0%
11 Begin Ventilation and Filter Analysis
LE 11/16/11 2/7/12 0%
Table 6: Action Item List
35 | P a g e
Proposed Spring 2012 Schedule
Table 7: Proposed Schedule
36 | P a g e
Resources Needed
Item Description Quantity Individual Price Overall Price Subtotal (w/on hand) Subtotal (w/o on hand)1 AutoDesk Inventor Software 1 $1,500.00 On Hand2 MEEP Machine Shop Work 5 hours $25.00 On Hand
Misc. Costs $0.00 $1,625.003 Arduino Uno 1 $30.00 $30.004 AC Adapter 1 $7.00 $7.005 Optical Phototransistor (QRD1114) 5 $1.13 $5.656 T1-3/4 (5mm) Multicolor RGB LED with White Diffused Lens 10 $1.75 $17.507 CanaKit 1/4W Resistor Kit 1 $15.00 $15.008 Wire (6 colors) 60 foot $0.1-0 per foot $6.00
Electrical Costs $81.15 $81.159 Steel Plate (48"x48" 1/4"thickness) 1 $118.86 $118.8610 Steel Rectangular Shaft (2"x2" 1/4"thickness) 50 $0.54 per inch $27.0511 Pins for Clamp (1/2" diameter) 2 $1.00 $2.0012 Steel Clamp arms 2 $2.00 $4.0013 Neoprene Handle 1 $4.50 $4.5014 Misc. Bolts 100 $0.10 $10.00
Mechanical Costs $166.41 $166.41
Total $247.56 $1,872.56
Table 8: Resources Needed
List of Analyses
General Durability Analysis
o Will focus on estimated material life through life cycle analysis as well as operating needs (proper temperature, proper power, etc.) that must be met for the system to continue to function.
Reliability Analysiso Will focus on the ability to perform accurately and precisely over the life of the
unit. Prototype Implementation for Analysis Employee Strength Test
o Will be tested using force gauges to find the optimal force range for the project. Motion Capture for Production Rates
o Daily and weekly production analysis to ensure that the projected production rate is met.
Mechanical
Analysis of maximum force needed on handle Analysis of mechanical advantage Analysis of minimum pressure needed for plate clamping Analysis of proper sensor placement Analysis of maximum force applied on supports Analysis of tolerance through system
37 | P a g e
Analysis of clamping attachment placement Wear and fatigue testing
Electrical Analysis of output power Coding revision and testing Analysis of proper housing placement on jig Analysis of sensor accuracy Analysis of viewing placement of LEDs Analysis of LED placement on rack Analysis LEDs colors and brightness Analysis of filters efficiency Analysis of airflow and operating temperatures Analysis of exhaust vent placement
Works Cited
38 | P a g e
1. Dictionary.com, "handicap," in The American Heritage® Stedman's Medical Dictionary.
Source location: Houghton Mifflin Company.
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/handicap. [Oct 5, 2011]
2. American Fact Finder, U.S. Census Bureau, [Oct 2, 2011]
http://factfinder2.census.gov/faces/tableservices/jsf/pages/productview.xhtml?fpt=table
3. “About NISH.” Internet: http :// www . nish . org / NISH / [Oct 5, 2011]
4. AbilityOne Network Fact Sheet [Oct 4, 2011]
http://www.nish.org/NISH/Rooms/DisplayPages/LayoutInitial?
Container=com.webridge.entity.Entity%5BOID
%5B3A204683BB46664D9DEFF5408A4A0613%5D%5D
5. “Judging Criteria.” [Oct 5, 2011] http://www.instituteforempowerment.org/design-
challenge/judging-criteria
6. Specialized Training for Adult Rehabilitation. [Oct 3, 2011]
http://www.startinc.org/AboutUs.php
7. Better Packages, Inc. “Better Pack® 333 Plus water-activated paper tape dispenser.” 2008.
[Oct 5, 2011] http://www.betterpackages.com/products/dispensers/manual/bp333plus.shtml,
8. Seattle Robotics Society [Oct 4, 2011] http://www.seattlerobotics.org/guide/infrared.html
9. R.A. McIntosh, R. G. Bernier, D. A. Estabrooks. “Stacking System for Fanfold Paper and
The Like,” U.S Patent 4,226,410, Oct. 7, 1980.
10. Powerpress, Inc. “15 X15 Digital High Press Sublimation Clamp Shell
T Shirt Heat Press Transfer Screen Printing Machine.” 2010 [Nov 4 2011]
39 | P a g e
11. Bildr.org. “Are we getting close? Proximity Sensors + Arduino” [Nov 7, 2011]
http://bildr.org/2011/03/various-proximity-sensors-arduino/
12. Acronum.com. “Sample LED” [Dec 6, 2011]
http://acronum.com/nz-en/components/com_virtuemart/shop_image/product/
RGB_LED_5mm_4_00_4c47d58584e78.jpg
40 | P a g e
Appendix A
From: Carl Hartmann <[email protected]>Date: Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 12:25 PMSubject: Re: NISHTo: John Hughey <[email protected]>
Good Morning,
We have recently purchased two new tape machines, which brings our total to 4. In fullproduction, if we have the cardboard cut, we can utilize two people per tape machine. Wecurrently have trouble getting the cardboard cut, so we are utilizing only three or fourclients per day. ( We have a large crate building operation which is utilizing our saws inthe woodshop for another 4 weeks. After that we should be able to cut enough cardboardto utilize all of the tape machines.)
Presently per client, they are producing 80 - 90 bundles per day, per client. Presently weare producing an average of 250 per day, or about 1200 per week. We are being told, thatthe ideal production, per our customer , is 4,000 per week.
Hope this is helpful, please ask if you have other questions.
Carl
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 11:15 AM, John Hughey <[email protected]> wrote:Hi Carl,This is John Hughey, the project manager from the NISH design team. For the purpose of our design we were hoping you could provide us with the production figures for the carboard bumpers. When we first toured the facility Kathy mentioned that the Aluminum Company had recently increased demands so we need to know how many units they need per month and how many you are currently producing.Thanks,John Hughey
Appendix B
37 | P a g e
Saluki Engineering CompanySenior Engineering Design Center
College of Engineering – Mailcode 6603Carbondale IL 62901-6603
618-453-7837, -7031, -7025
Request for Proposals (RFP)
9 September 2011
Subject: AbilityOne Network Design Challenge
Client: Institute for Economic Empowerment
Project Number: F11-75-NISH
Since the passage of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 employers have been required to make adjustments in the work environment to make reasonable accommodation those with disabilities. The purpose of NISH goes beyond reasonable accommodation to a mission to create employment opportunities for people with severe disabilities by securing federal contracts through the AbilityOne Program for its network of community-based, nonprofit agencies. In keeping with this mission, the AbilityOne Network Design Challenge was founded to encourage the development of creative technological solutions for barriers that prevent people with disabilities from entering or advancing in the workplace.
Saluki Engineering Company, hereinafter SEC, has been appointed Architect-Engineer Coordinator for the referenced study on behalf of Institute for Economic Empowerment, hereafter Client, to make an engineering study of the referenced project.
SEC has divided the work into packages by engineering team capability and will coordinate the overall work. SEC has sent this bid package to three competitive engineering teams, hereinafter Engineer, of equal capability including your team. SEC is hereby requesting a proposal from Engineer for Client’s approval to do the defined work. The timeline for this project will be as follows:
8 November 2011 Proposal FINAL draft due posted on website by 11AM. This proposal will be evaluated for compensation (grade in the course).
8 November – 17 November 2011 First Design Reviews teams 70-77
42 | P a g e
Saluki Engineering CompanySenior Engineering Design Center
College of Engineering – Mailcode 6603Carbondale IL 62901-6603
618-453-7837, -7031, -7025
29 Nov – 8 Dec 2011 Oral presentations of proposals 11:00-11:50 am in EGR A111
8 December 2011 Spiral bound hardcopy AND proposal posted to website with required modifications, if any
17 January 2012 Phase II work begins.
23 February 2012 Progress Reports posted to web space by 1PM
19 April 2012 Design Reports (6 copies: 3-ring binder + 4CDs + Website) due at 1PM
24-26 April 2012 Demonstrations of projects E215 1PM
24-26 April 2012 Presentations of posters E215 1PM (may be required on an earlier date)
1-3 May 2012 Design oral presentations
Your proposal will receive conditional acceptance on 12 Dec 2011; you may have to make additional changes in January after Management and Client review it and new data become available.
43 | P a g e
Saluki Engineering Company9 September 2011 Project # F11-75-NISHSEC Request For Proposal Letter Page 44
Engineer will present the drawings, specifications, and explanatory text in a final Design Report together with the capital cost estimate and schedule to construct, install, or manufacture the product.
One written and one oral progress report will be required during the design as indicated above. In addition, one to three design review meetings will be required.
The proposal, which you will submit by noon according to the attached schedule, must include:
1. A cover and title page2. A transmittal letter3. An abstract or executive summary of 300 to 500 words4. A non-disclosure statement5. A table of contents6. An introduction that indicates that you understand the study and why it is being undertaken.7. A literature survey that lays out the following:
a. An introduction that outlines the content of the literature reviewb. what is already known about projects of this type, including similar existing systemsc. what the required design procedures ared. the relevant content of the applicable codes and standardse. the relevant materials and components available on the marketf. a summary of how the reviewed literature relates to this project
8. An over all project description that indicates the subsystems and their relationships to each other, including a site plan or block diagram to visually show how the subsystems are related, and how this system will be different from existing systems
9. The design basis10. For each subsystem,
a. a description of what each subsystem will be or dob. a description of how each subsystem relates to the other subsystems, including references to the site
plan or block diagram to show the relationships,c. a list of the elements which will define the subsystem design,d. a list of deliverables, including all drawings, tables, lists, write-ups and other elements, that you can
now identify as probable parts of the Design Report you will submit at the completion of the projecte. a list of design activities required to produce the deliverables listed
11. A project organization chart indicating project manager and showing for each nominee: name, principal area of responsibility, and discipline (ME, EE, or CpE);
12. An action item list that shows detailed action items for the first two weeks and significant action items for weeks thereafter
13. Team timeline indicating major design activities and significant milestones in eithera. Excel or Word table, b. Microsoft Project, orc. other project tracking software package.
[Note that there is a lot of redundancy between 10e, 11, and 12. Be aware that self-consistency is one item on which your proposal will be evaluated.]
44 | P a g e
Saluki Engineering Company9 September 2011 Project # F11-75-NISHSEC Request For Proposal Letter Page 45
14. A list of all resources you will need including space, computers and specialized software required, and including – for design and build projects – a list of all components that you can now anticipate needing and their actual costs, or current location if they are to be borrowed
15. List of data analyses, experiments, and simulations to be performed16. Description of what is to be built and demonstrated or software to be written and demonstrated17. An appendix that includes
a. the resumes for all candidates for the teamb. copies of any communications your team has with Client, other companies, or individuals.
Any literature that your team requests that vendors send to the College of Engineering during the course of the writing of this proposal will be addressed as follows:
A. Weston, F. Harackiewicz, or K. PurcellCollege of Engineering – Mailcode 6603
Southern Illinois University
Carbondale IL 62901-6603
In addition, any information you request to be faxed should be sent to
A. Weston, F. Harackiewicz, or K. PurcellFAX: 618-453-7455
Voice: 618-453-7837 (Weston), -7031 (Harackiewicz)
618-559-6190 (Purcell)
Please note: If any material that arrives is sent to YOUR name at the college, you will never see the material because students are not known by name to the mailroom staff. Be sure to give SEC management a memo indicating (1) what and from whom you ordered and (2) the SEC Reference Number of the team that is to get it. This is to alert management to watch for your material and recognize it when it comes in.
Engineer will adjust the Scope of Work so that it is suitable for each of the engineers who will be working on the project. If significant design components of the project must be omitted because of time or staff limitations, clearly identify them in your proposal. Your final cost analysis must, in any event, account for them.
The attachments to this letter are listed below:
1. Client’s project definition
2. Design Report deliverables checklist
3. Spring 2012 tentative schedule
45 | P a g e
Saluki Engineering Company9 September 2011 Project # F11-75-NISHSEC Request For Proposal Letter Page 46
SEC management looks forward to receiving your proposal. Engineer shall deliver the proposal to the SIU Engineering College complex in Carbondale, Illinois, addressed to the attention of Dr. F. Harackiewicz and Mrs. Purcell, SEC's Managers of ECE Projects or Dr. A. Weston, SEC’s Manager of ME Projects.
Sincerely,
F J Harackiewicz
Manager of ECE Projects<[email protected]>
46 | P a g e
Saluki Engineering Company 9 September 2011 Project # F11-75-NISH SEC Request For Proposal Letter Page 47Attachment 1 - Project Definition
Client wants a device or a system that will solve a real workplace problem for at least one group of severely handicapped workers.
The winning proposal for the device or system will have verifiable, quantified goals. The proposal will describe technologies that have been used in the past as well as those currently being used to overcome the problem. The functional description of the proposed device or system will include a statement of how it is different from, and better than, what currently exists. The proposed schedule will allow for at least three design-build-test-modify iterations. The proposal will incorporate all of the requirements for a winning design.
The device or system itself will have complete documentation so that it may be reproduced for use with others of similar handicap. The documentation will contain a thorough failure analysis and data from validation and revalidation of the design with members of the group it will serve.
More information on the design challenge for 2011-2012 can be found here: http://www.instituteforempowerment.org/design-challenge
Challenge requirements can be found here:
http://www.instituteforempowerment.org/design-challenge/submission-specifications
For online registration go to:
http://www.instituteforempowerment.org/design-challenge/registration/college-entrants
For Judging criteria:
http://www.instituteforempowerment.org/design-challenge/judging-criteria
In case of a conflict between this RFP and Client's design requests, Client's design requests control. As new data become available, Client may give Engineer additional data and criteria that Engineer will incorporate into the design.
47 | P a g e
Saluki Engineering Company 9 September 2011 Project # F11-75-NISH SEC Request For Proposal Letter Page 48Attachment 2 - Design Report Deliverables Checklist
The proposal Engineer submits will indicate that these items will be included in the Design Report (not the Proposal!):
1. A literature review relevant to the design submitted (not a copy of the literature review in this proposal)
2. A complete technical description and the results of all work done for all solution options studied3. Equipment, component, materials take-off lists and costs for each solution studied4. Engineering drawings defining the solutions5. A recommended solution and a detailed justification for the choice recommended or implemented,
including a Pugh chart or some similar matrix comparison chart that is discussed in the text6. A complete technical description of the recommended system and how it works7. Incorporate into descriptions a summary and the significance of any laboratory work, computer
simulations, or mathematical analysis performed.8. A complete engineering specification for the system including all engineering drawings necessary
for construction, manufacture, or installation and maintenance and repair 9. A complete list of the components and signals in the process, and a list of the ones that are included
in the model, if any, with the corresponding part of the model identified10. Tables of performance data – individual subsystem and overall – expected and, for the part that was
built, achieved11. Identification of the important technical problems and limitations encountered during design,
construction and debugging, e.g., time, accuracy of results, reproducibility of results, limitations on input
12. An analysis of electromagnetic compatibility issues and changes necessary in the design to meet EMC code specifications
13. A fault analysis of the recommended system, including identification of all faults that could occur, a technical solution to eliminate their consequences, and the cost for incorporating the improvement
14. For the working model, Technical Manual that includes a technical description of both the hardware and the software, together with, but not limited to: appropriate hardware engineering drawings and component lists; software flowcharts, listings, and disks; and instructions for construction, maintenance, trouble shooting, and modification
15. If a prototype of the device was built, User's Guide for the individual using the prototype, including both instructions on how to connect and use the hardware, how to set up and use the software, what performance can be expected, and what limitations the prototype has
16. A conclusion and recommendations section that a. summarizes the performance, b. includes recommendations for improvement, enhancement, and manufacture, and c. discusses the economic, societal, environmental, manufacturability, health, and safety issues
related to this project if it is implemented17. An estimate of the amount of capital required to construct, build, manufacture, or install the
designed system, whichever is appropriate 18. A timeline schedule to construct, build, manufacture, or install the designed system, whichever is
appropriate
48 | P a g e
Saluki Engineering Company 9 September 2011 Project # F11-75-NISH SEC Request For Proposal Letter Page 49Attachment 2 - Design Report Deliverables Checklist19. In an appendix:
a. the actual itemized cost to construct the prototype, including costs of ruined components and components for options not included in the prototype
b. any calculations, spreadsheets, computer simulation results, or other data that should be a part of the report but is too numerous or too bulky to be included in the report itself, this material will be be referenced and summarized in tables in the report,
c. formal laboratory reports for all laboratory work performed with the results referenced and summarized in the report, and
d. for projects NOT having a working prototype with a Technical Manual, a listing of any software developed as a part of the project.
49 | P a g e
Appendix C
50 | P a g e
51 | P a g e
52 | P a g e
Appendix D
53 | P a g e
Benjamin W. Blair
13536 Mary’s Creek Rd. (618) 317-1926Sparta, IL 62286 [email protected]
OBJECTIVE Seeking full time employment in the mechanical engineering field.
EDUCATION Southern Illinois University Carbondale, ILBachelor of Science in Mechanical Engineering, May 2012
GPA: 3.58/4.00
Related Coursework:ThermodynamicsMechanical DesignHeat TransferEngineering Economics
Fluid MechanicsInternal Combustion EnginesComputer-Aided DrawingMaterial Selection
EXPERIENCE Farmhand, Blair Farms Inc. 2006-PresentOperated and maintained mechanical equipment, obtaining understanding of how different machines work.
Assistant, Sparta Animal ClinicPerformed office duties, building skills filing paperwork and improving my customer interaction.
SKILLS Computer Skills: Microsoft Office, AutoCAD, C++, MATLAB
LEADERSHIP AND AWARDS
Academic Scholarship, SIUC, 2008-2010Volunteer Track and Field Coach, Sparta High School, 2010-2011Volunteer Math Team Coach, Sparta High School, 2010
54 | P a g e
55 | P a g e
LINDEN EASON, A.A.
Contact [email protected]
905 East Park Street Apt D5Carbondale, IL 62901
(815) 519-3741
Objective: To seek an internship position with a company requiring me to utilize my technical abilities and further develop my engineering knowledge.
Education: Southern Illinois University Carbondale Major: Electrical And Computer EngineeringCumulative GPA: 3.0/4.0 Major GPA: 3.3/4.0 Expected Graduate Graduation: Fall 2012Minor: Mathematics
Rock Valley College A.A.Cumulative GPA: 3.0/4.0
Experience: Southern Illinois University Carbondale - Teacher’s Assistant Provided students with diverse ways to approach technical
assignments Graded all of the class assignments
Foot Locker Inc. – Champs Sports Sales Representative Worked to provide customers with the best customer care Helped organize and monitor inventory
The Kroger Co. – Hilander Foods Gas Clerk & Deli Worker2. Managed the gas clerk area3. Managed deli area
Fall 2011-present
March 2006 – September 2007
May 2005 – December 2005
Skills: MATLAB simulink Visual Studio, C++ Microsoft Office Suite Xilinx
Volunteer Work:
ACT preparation program-Helped to develop students test taking skills
Engineering Day SIUC -Hovercraft demonstration
Erma Hayes Center -Served as a mentor for children at the Erma Hayes Center
Adopt a Spot NSBE-Helped to clean excess garbage off a stretch of road
Fall 2006-present
Honors and Activities:
Dean’s List Awarded Smart Grant Awarded Minority Engineering Program Scholarship
Fall 2008Fall 09-Spring 11Fall 2011-Spring
56 | P a g e
LINDEN EASON, A.A.
2012ExtracurricularActivities:
National Society of Black Engineers member SIUC -Helped in the organization of volunteer work, fundraising and events. - Serve as one of the chapter’s senators
Fall 2011-present
Permanent Address: College Address:
102 DLK Drive 221 Bailey Hall
Anna, IL 62906 1225 Point Drive
618-833-3772 Carbondale, IL 62901
618-536-7979
Objective: A career in computer engineering.
Education
Southern Illinois University Carbondale (SIUC), Carbondale, Illinois August 2007 - Present
Course work toward Bachelors of Science in Computer Engineering with a Minor in Management
GPA: 3.0/4.0
Relevant Coursework
Digital Circuit Design Intro to Software Engineering Verilog and VHDL Synthesis
Experience
Resident Assistant, Southern Illinois University Carbondale August 2009-Present
Help Residents with both academic and personal issues.
Provide programming and other services to help improve the college experience.
Help achieve the mission and vision of SIUC University Housing.
Cook/Delivery Driver, Pizza Hut Inc. August 2006 – August 2008
Help satisfy customer complaints.
Skills
Microsoft Office Suite: Word, Excel, PowerPoint
Awards & Honors
57 | P a g e
CAD/CAM Energy in Society Energy Systems and Management
Material Science Material Selection for Design Pneumatic/Hydraulic Design
LINDEN EASON, A.A.
College of Engineering Scholarship Fall 2008 – Spring 2010
Dean’s List, SIUC Spring 2007 – Fall 2008
Activities
Residence Halls of Horror – Director, Room Coordinator Fall 2009 – Fall 2011
Thompson Point Executive Council (TPEC) – Vice President Fall 2008 – Spring 2009
SIUC Leadership Council Fall 2007 – Spring 2008
Objective An entry level position in Mechanical Engineering beginning May 2012.
Skills Excellent written and oral communication skillsNumerous leadership experiencesWorks well in a team or an independent setting
Education Southern Illinois University; Carbondale, IllinoisCarbondale, Illinois 62901 Pursuing Bachelor’s in Mechanical Engineering Pursuing Minor in Mathematics Projected Graduation Date: Spring 2012 GPA: 3.19/4.00
SpecializedCourseWork
RelevantWorkExperience
RelevantProjects
58 | P a g e
School Address (Until 5/15/2012)900 S. Elizabeth Street
Apartment #3Carbondale, IL 62901
Permanent Address13132 Fenwick StreetFishers, IN 46037
Cell: 618-303-0975Email: [email protected]
Boeing Integrated Defense Systems Externship - Joint Helmet Mounted Cueing System (JHMCS) integration for F-15’s and F/A 18’s; St. Louis, MO (March 2011)
SIUC Resident Assistant; SIUC University Housing (August 2009-May 2010)SIUC College of Engineering Peer Mentor; SIUC University Housing (August 2008-May 2009)
Vacuum Flask Drinking Apparatus (Spring 2011) Individualized design of flask with in depth material selection based on
Thermos® technology“A Renewable Home”: A Project on Sustainability and Renewable Energy Sources for the Modern Home (Spring 2009)
Project Manager Research and development of a completely self-sustained living unit complete
with energy flow analysis and renewable energy systems design
LINDEN EASON, A.A.
Awards SIUC Dean’s List and College of Engineering Honor Roll (Fall 2007, Summer 2009)Two time recipient of the Highway District #9 Engineering Scholarship (Fall 2008, Fall 2009) Phi Sigma Kappa Fraternity 2008-2009 “Brother of the Year”
Activities Order of Omega Honor Society (April 2010-Present)Golden Key Honor Society (October 2008-Present)Alpha Lambda Delta Honor Society (May 2008-Present)Phi Sigma Kappa Fraternity (May 2008-Present)
President (November 2009-November 2010) Vice-President (November 2010-April 2010)
59 | P a g e