F Y October 29, 2009. How do we look? ? ACPE Accreditation

F YOctober 29, 2009October 29, 2009

How do we look?How do we look?

??

ACPE AccreditationACPE Accreditation

Terrific!Terrific!

ACPE AccreditationACPE Accreditation

ACPE Self-Study Report FindingsACPE Self-Study Report Findings

• Mission and Planning—

• Organization and Administration—

• Curriculum—

• Students—

• Faculty and Staff—

• Facilities and Resources—

FACULTY AACP SurveyFACULTY AACP Survey

How do we stack up?How do we stack up?

??100% response from the 55 faculty 100% response from the 55 faculty

members who participate in the PharmD members who participate in the PharmD ProgramProgram

Graduating Student SurveyGraduating Student Survey

How do we How do we stack up?stack up?

??96% response from the 96% response from the 100 PharmD students 100 PharmD students who graduated in the who graduated in the Class of 2009Class of 2009

Benchmark Schools for ACPEBenchmark Schools for ACPE

• University of Arizona• University of Illinois at

Chicago• University of North

Carolina• University of Kansas

• The Ohio State University• University of Michigan• University at Buffalo• University of Kentucky• University of Iowa

Legend for Benchmark GraphsLegend for Benchmark Graphs

Pitt Peer All AACP Schools

50 60 70 80 90 100

Figure 2-1. Faculty Agreeing with Statement

31. School effectively employs strategic planning

32. Input requested during development of strategic plan

All AACP SchoolsPeer SchoolsPitt 50 60 70 80 90 100

Figure 9-1. Percent of Faculty Surveyed Agreeing withStatements

40. Curriculum is consistent with the collective vision ...

41. Faculty are consulted in curricular matters

42. Organization and structure of curriculum is clear

43. Instructional content fits curriculum

45. Curricular collaboration encouraged...

All AACP SchoolsPeer SchoolsPitt

50 60 70 80 90 100

Figure 7-1. Percent Faculty Surveyed Agreeingwith Statements on School Administration

1. Have clearly defined responsibilities

2. Function as a unified team

3. Are aware of my needs/problems

4. Are responsive to my needs/ problems

90.7%86.6%83.2%

83.3%81.7%76.4%

83.3%75.0%77.3%

79.6%72.9%72.2%

Pitt Peer Schools All AACP Schools

50 60 70 80 90 100


20. Receive adequate support staff resources


SURVEY DATA: Look for the Blue!

ACPE Self-Study ReportACPE Self-Study Report

• Mission and Planning • Organization and Administration • Curriculum• Students• Faculty and Staff• Facilities and Resources

Mission and PlanningMission and Planning

50 60 70 80 90 100


31. School effectively employs strategic planning

32. Input requested during development of strategic plan


PAGE (PAGE (PProgress rogress AAt a t a GGlanclancEE))National Leader in Education

Measure Target FY02 FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09

First-Time Pass Rate NAPLEX

>95% 96.4% 90.1% 96.7% 99.0% 100%

Peer Review Publications (Education)

5 1 5 5 7

Long-Range Plan Evaluate

•Dean•LTeam•Faculty•CAC, CC•Stakeholders

•Councils•Departments •Committees•Task forces•Teams

•Dean•LTeam•Faculty•CAC, CC•Stakeholders

•Dean, Leadership Team

PAGE, Assess Matrix

Annual ReportRevise

Figure 3-1. Plan and Evaluation Process

CAC: Curriculum Assessment Committee CC: Curriculum Committee

““The Commendables”: The Commendables”: Mission and Planning: Chapters 1-3Mission and Planning: Chapters 1-3

• PharmD program mission is articulated on every syllabus.. . . & has been for many years

• Our extensive history and experience in Long-Range Plan and re-evaluating our plan

• Sustained use of measurable outcomes and tracking progress to achieve goals

ACPE: Six Sections of The Self-Study ACPE: Six Sections of The Self-Study ReportReport


Administration: Faculty SurveyAdministration: Faculty Survey

50 60 70 80 90 100

Figure 7-1. Percent Faculty Surveyed Agreeingwith Statements on School Administration

1. Have clearly defined responsibilities

2. Function as a unified team

3. Are aware of my needs/problems

4. Are responsive to my needs/ problems

90.7%86.6%83.2%

83.3%81.7%76.4%

83.3%75.0%77.3%

79.6%72.9%72.2%

Pitt Peer Schools All AACP Schools

UPMC SupportUPMC Support

'99 '00 '01 '02 '03 '04 '05 '06 '07 '08 '090

1000

2000

3000

4000

Figure 6-1. Faculty Support from UPMC

$3,580,770

Year

Th

ou

san

ds

““The Commendables:” Chapters 4-8 The Commendables:” Chapters 4-8 Organization and AdministrationOrganization and Administration

• Faculty representation on University committees

• Our sustained and successful partnerships

• Consensus process—supports our culture of collegiality, congeniality, and achievement.

• Experience, academic strength, and leadership of the dean.



Curriculum: Faculty SurveyCurriculum: Faculty Survey

50 60 70 80 90 100

Figure 9-1. Percent of Faculty Surveyed Agreeing withStatements

40. Curriculum is consistent with the collective vision ...

41. Faculty are consulted in curricular matters

42. Organization and structure of curriculum is clear

43. Instructional content fits curriculum

45. Curricular collaboration encouraged...


Curriculum: Graduating Student SurveyCurriculum: Graduating Student Survey

50 60 70 80 90 100All AACP SchoolsPeer SchoolsPitt

Figure 11-1. Percentage of Graduating Students Agreeing with Statement

Doctor of Pharmacy Curriculum...

31. Developed the skills...for continued learning...

32. Provided opportunities to engage in active learning...in class

33. Encouraged students to ask questions in class

84. Prepared students to enter pharmacy practice

Curriculum Assessment: Faculty Curriculum Assessment: Faculty

50 60 70 80 90 100


Figure 15-1. Percentage of Faculty Agreeing with Statement

8. Committee responsible for assessment is effective

46. School uses programmatic assessment data to improve the curriculum

Commendables: Chapters 9-15Commendables: Chapters 9-15CurriculumCurriculum

• NAPLEX and MJPE pass rate

• Standardized syllabus—mission of the PharmD Program

• Culture that fosters the scholarship of education

• Development and implementation of curricular maps

• Extensive integration of IPPEs and classroom-based learning

• Development, refinement, and adoption of the Assessment Matrix


• Mission and Planning

• Organization and Administration

• Curriculum

• Students

• Faculty and Staff

• Facilities and Resources

Perceptions: Student SurveyPerceptions: Student Survey

50 60 70 80 90 100

Figure 23-1. Percent Students Surveyed Agreeingwith Statements

63. School is welcoming to students with diverse backgrounds

68. Preceptors modeled . . . attributes, behaviors in practice experience70. Aware of behaviors . . . professional, academic conduct

74. School was supportive of student professional organizations

67. Faculty committed to . . . professionalism, leadership, mentoring......


73. Encouraged to participate in . . . meetings and to pursue leadership . . .

Students sayStudents say “We Communicate”“We Communicate”

50 60 70 80 90 100


Figure 22-1. Percentage Graduating Students Agreeing with Statement

58. School provided timely information about news....

60. School's administration responded to problems...

65. Student government effectively communicated opinions...

66. School obtained student perspectives on curriculum. student services...

Applications for 50 Open Admission SeatsApplications for 50 Open Admission Seats

'05 '06 '07 '08 '090

200

400

600

800

1000

Figure 16-1. Applications Processed by Year

SupplementalPharmCAS

>10:1

Students: ScholarshipsStudents: Scholarships

'02 '03 '04 '05 '06 '07 '08 '09 '100

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

Figure 16-2. Students Awarded Scholarships

Fiscal Year

Students: GPA at graduationStudents: GPA at graduation

'07 '08 '09 '100

1

2

3

4

Figure 17-2. GPA at Graduation

OpenConditional

Calculated at completion of P3 year

Graduation Year

GP

A

““The Commendables:” Chapters 16-23The Commendables:” Chapters 16-23Students (student services, policies)Students (student services, policies)

• Effective, standardized admissions scoring system

• Students participate extensively in committees

• Student input has generated quality improvements


• Mission and Planning

• Organization and Administration

• Curriculum

• Students

• Faculty and Staff

• Facilities and Resources

50 60 70 80 90 100


20. Receive adequate support staff resources


Staff SupportStaff Support

50 60 70 80 90 100


11. School uses an effective faculty recruitment process


0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80


34. Funds are available to support faculty development


Funds for DevelopmentFunds for Development

0 20 40 60 80 100


27. School has sufficient number of qualified faculty


Faculty Recruitment ProcessFaculty Recruitment Process Number of Faculty Number of Faculty

Performance Criteria & FeedbackPerformance Criteria & Feedback

Time Allocation of FacultyTime Allocation of Faculty

50 60 70 80 90 100



27. School has a sufficient...faculty

62. Time spent on teaching is appropriate

63. Time spent on reseach is appropriate

64. Time spent on service is appropriate65. Time spent on clinical service is appropriate

50 60 70 80 90 100


Figure 26-3. Percentage Faculty Agreeingwith Statement

14. Allocation of effort was clearly stated

15. Criteria for performance assessment are consistent with responsibilities

18. Performance feedback is effective

Faculty Development: Faculty SurveyFaculty Development: Faculty Survey

50 60 70 80 90 100


36. Programs available to improve teaching ...

37. Programs available to develop competence in research...


Faculty Commitment: AlumniFaculty Commitment: Alumni

50 60 70 80 90 100

Figure 23-2. Percent Alumni Surveyed Agreeingwith Statement

18. School provided environment ...promoted professionalbehavior...harmonious relationships ...

19. Faculty committed to developing professionalism...


““The Commendables:” Chapters 24-26The Commendables:” Chapters 24-26Faculty and StaffFaculty and Staff

• Faculty depth and breadth of expertise

• Faculty accomplishments

• The School’s commitment to professional development of faculty, staff, and preceptors—a measure of excellence



ResourcesResources

Library

Physical

Financial

Library: OverallLibrary: Overall

50 60 70 80 90 100

Peer SchoolsPitt

Figure 29-1. Analysis of Basic Resources for Pharmacy Education(2008) and Core Journals (2009) Holdings at School and Mean of

Peer Schools

Resources Overall

Resources First Purchase

Percentage

Journals

Experiential Learning Sites: Students Experiential Learning Sites: Students

50 60 70 80 90 100

Figure 28-1. Percentage of Graduate Student Agreeingwith Statement

39. Sites for introductory pharmacy practice experiences were of high quality

46. Practice experience electives met needs

48. Sites for advanced pharmacy practice experiences were of high quality


SpaceSpace

2002 2006 2007 2008 2009 20120

25000

50000

75000

100000

125000

Figure 27-2. School of Pharmacy Space Allocation

58,000

72,31382,876 84,299

108,229

84,723

Fiscal Year

Squ

are

Fee

t

Resources: Faculty SurveyResources: Faculty Survey

50 60 70 80 90 100


28. Resources can accommodate present student enrollment


Facilities: StudentsFacilities: Students

50 60 70 80 90 100


77. Computer and information technology

78. Classrooms

79. Laboratories and non-classroom environments

80. Study areas in school or elsewhere

Figure 27-1. Graduating Student SurveyResponses: . . . "were conducive to learning"

School: Financial StatusSchool: Financial Status

'99 '00 '01 '02 '03 '04 '05 '06 '07 '08 '090

5000

10000

15000

20000

25000

University

UPMC

Endowments & GiftsSponsored Projects

Figure 30-1. Expenditures by Source

Fiscal Year

CE

Fund

s (T

hous

ands

)

Resources: EndowmentResources: Endowment

'97 '98 '99 '00 '01 '02 '03 '04 '05 '06 '07 '08 '090

5

10

15

Figure 30-2. School of Pharmacy Endowment - Book Value

$13,841,444

Fiscal Year

Dol

lars

(M

ilion

s)

ACPE: The Self-Study ReportACPE: The Self-Study Report• Mission and Planning—

– Long history of Long-Range Plan, PAGE• Organization and Administration—

– Outstanding partnerships, administration, culture of consensus• Curriculum—

– Commendable; curriculum & assessment; organization; IPPEs• Students—

– High achievers, well-supported by faculty and staff• Faculty and Staff—

– Outstanding in depth, breadth, expertise; • Facilities and Resources—

– Library beyond compare, more experiential sites than used each year, financially sound, building on track

How do we really stack up?How do we really stack up?

??

ACPE Accreditation

As our colleague, Dr. Colleen Culley,

has so eloquently stated,

WE ROCK!!!

Documents

F Y October 29, 2009. How do we look? ? ACPE Accreditation