46
Extensions of the notions of polynomial and rational hull Alexander J. Izzo Banach Algebras and Applications, July 2019, University of Manitoba

Extensions of the notions of polynomial and rational hullbanach2019/pdf/Izzo.pdf · 2019. 7. 21. · Banach Algebras and Applications, July 2019, University of Manitoba. Outline

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    5

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • Extensions of the notions of polynomial and rational hull

    Alexander J. Izzo

    Banach Algebras and Applications, July 2019, University of Manitoba

  • Outline

    I. Polynomial and Rational Hulls

    II. Motivating Questions

    III. The New Hulls

    IV. Applications

  • Polynomial and Rational Convexity

    X ⊂ Cn compact

    Definition: The polynomial hull of X ⊂ Cn is the set

    X̂ = {z ∈ Cn : |p(z)| ≤ maxx∈X

    |p(x)| for every polynomial p}.

    X is said to be polynomially convex if X̂ = X .

    X̂ is said to be nontrivial if X̂ \ X 6= ∅.

  • Polynomial and Rational Convexity

    X ⊂ Cn compact

    Definition: The polynomial hull of X ⊂ Cn is the set

    X̂ = {z ∈ Cn : |p(z)| ≤ maxx∈X

    |p(x)| for every polynomial p}.

    X is said to be polynomially convex if X̂ = X .

    X̂ is said to be nontrivial if X̂ \ X 6= ∅.

    P (X)= uniform closure of polynomials in z1, . . . , zn on X

    X̂ is the maximal ideal space of P (X).

    In particular, P (X) = C(X) =⇒ X̂ = X .

  • Examples

    In the plane, a compact set is polynomially convex if and only its com-

    plement is connected. The polynomial hull of a compact set in the plane

    is obtained by filling in the holes.

  • Examples

    In the plane, a compact set is polynomially convex if and only its com-

    plement is connected. The polynomial hull of a compact set in the plane

    is obtained by filling in the holes.

    The situation is vastly more complicated in CN for N ≥ 2. Consider

    K1 = {(eiθ, 0) : 0 ≤ θ ≤ 2π} K2 = {(e

    iθ, e−iθ) : 0 ≤ θ ≤ 2π}

    Both are circles, but K̂1 is the disc {(z, 0) : |z| ≤ 1}, while K2 is poly-

    nomially convex.

  • Examples

    In the plane, a compact set is polynomially convex if and only its com-

    plement is connected. The polynomial hull of a compact set in the plane

    is obtained by filling in the holes.

    The situation is vastly more complicated in CN for N ≥ 2. Consider

    K1 = {(eiθ, 0) : 0 ≤ θ ≤ 2π} K2 = {(e

    iθ, e−iθ) : 0 ≤ θ ≤ 2π}

    Both are circles, but K̂1 is the disc {(z, 0) : |z| ≤ 1}, while K2 is poly-

    nomially convex.

    There exist non-polynomially convex arcs (Wermer 1955) and Cantor

    sets (Rudin 1956).

  • Polynomial and Rational Convexity

    X ⊂ Cn compact

    Definition: The polynomial hull of X ⊂ Cn is the set

    X̂ = {z ∈ Cn : |p(z)| ≤ maxx∈X

    |p(x)| for every polynomial p}.

  • Polynomial and Rational Convexity

    X ⊂ Cn compact

    Definition: The polynomial hull of X ⊂ Cn is the set

    X̂ = {z ∈ Cn : |p(z)| ≤ maxx∈X

    |p(x)| for every polynomial p}.

    Definition: The rational hull of X ⊂ Cn is the set

    hr(X) = {z ∈ CN : p(z) ∈ p(X) for all polynomials p}.

    X is said to be rationally convex if hr(X) = X .

    hr(X) is said to be nontrivial if hr(X) \ X 6= ∅.

  • Polynomial and Rational Convexity

    X ⊂ Cn compact

    Definition: The polynomial hull of X ⊂ Cn is the set

    X̂ = {z ∈ Cn : |p(z)| ≤ maxx∈X

    |p(x)| for every polynomial p}.

    Definition: The rational hull of X ⊂ Cn is the set

    hr(X) = {z ∈ CN : p(z) ∈ p(X) for all polynomials p}.

    X is said to be rationally convex if hr(X) = X .

    hr(X) is said to be nontrivial if hr(X) \ X 6= ∅.

    R(X)= uniform closure of rational functions holomorphic on X

    hr(X) is the maximal ideal space of R(X).

    In particular, R(X) = C(X) =⇒ hr(X) = X .

  • Analytic Structure in Polynomial Hulls

    Observe: If X ⊂ Cn bounds an analytic variety V , then by the maximum

    principle, V is contained in X̂.

  • Analytic Structure in Polynomial Hulls

    Observe: If X ⊂ Cn bounds an analytic variety V , then by the maximum

    principle, V is contained in X̂.

    “Conjecture”: Every nontrivial polynomial hull contains an analytic disc.

  • Analytic Structure in Polynomial Hulls

    Observe: If X ⊂ Cn bounds an analytic variety V , then by the maximum

    principle, V is contained in X̂.

    “Conjecture”: Every nontrivial polynomial hull contains an analytic disc.

    Wermer (1958) prove this in the case of real-analytic 1-manifolds.

  • Analytic Structure in Polynomial Hulls

    Observe: If X ⊂ Cn bounds an analytic variety V , then by the maximum

    principle, V is contained in X̂.

    “Conjecture”: Every nontrivial polynomial hull contains an analytic disc.

    Wermer (1958) prove this in the case of real-analytic 1-manifolds.

    Theorem (Alexander 1971): If J is a rectifiable arc in Cn, then J is

    polynomially convex (and P (J) = C(J)).

    Theorem (Alexander 1971): If J is a rectifiable simple closed curve in

    Cn, then either J is polynomially convex (and P (J) = C(J)) or else

    Ĵ \ J a one-dimensional complex analytic subvariety of Cn \ J .

  • Polynomial Hulls without Analytic Discs

    Theorem (Stolzenberg 1963): There exists a compact set X in C2 such

    that X̂ \ X 6= ∅ but X̂ contains no analytic discs.

  • Polynomial Hulls without Analytic Discs

    Theorem (Stolzenberg 1963): There exists a compact set X in C2 such

    that X̂ \ X 6= ∅ but X̂ contains no analytic discs.

    Many later examples:

    Wermer (1970, 1982)

    Duval and Levenberg (1997)

    Alexander (1998)

  • Polynomial Hulls without Analytic Discs

    Theorem (Stolzenberg 1963): There exists a compact set X in C2 such

    that X̂ \ X 6= ∅ but X̂ contains no analytic discs.

    Many later examples:

    Wermer (1970, 1982)

    Duval and Levenberg (1997)

    Alexander (1998)

    Polynomial Hulls with Dense Invertibles

    Theorem (Dales and Feinstein 2008): There exists a compact set X in

    C2 with X̂ \ X 6= ∅ such that P (X) has dense invertibles.

  • Topology of Sets with Hull without Analytic Discs

    Theorem (I., Samuelsson Kalm, Wold, 2016; I., Stout 2018): Every

    smooth compact manifold of real dimension ≥ 2 smoothly embeds in

    CN for some N so as to have nontrivial polynomial hull without analytic

    discs.

  • Topology of Sets with Hull without Analytic Discs

    Theorem (I., Samuelsson Kalm, Wold, 2016; I., Stout 2018): Every

    smooth compact manifold of real dimension ≥ 2 smoothly embeds in

    CN for some N so as to have nontrivial polynomial hull without analytic

    discs.

    Question (Bercovici 2014): Does there exist a (nonsmooth) 1-dimensional

    manifold with nontrivial polynomial hull without analytic discs?

  • Topology of Sets with Hull without Analytic Discs

    Theorem (I., Samuelsson Kalm, Wold, 2016; I., Stout 2018): Every

    smooth compact manifold of real dimension ≥ 2 smoothly embeds in

    CN for some N so as to have nontrivial polynomial hull without analytic

    discs.

    Question (Bercovici 2014): Does there exist a (nonsmooth) 1-dimensional

    manifold with nontrivial polynomial hull without analytic discs?

    A similar question was raised by Wermer (1954) but for 1-dimensional

    manifold in C2.

  • Topology of Sets with Hull without Analytic Discs

    Theorem (I., Samuelsson Kalm, Wold, 2016; I., Stout 2018): Every

    smooth compact manifold of real dimension ≥ 2 smoothly embeds in

    CN for some N so as to have nontrivial polynomial hull without analytic

    discs.

    Question (Bercovici 2014): Does there exist a (nonsmooth) 1-dimensional

    manifold with nontrivial polynomial hull without analytic discs?

    A similar question was raised by Wermer (1954) but for 1-dimensional

    manifold in C2.

    Question: Which compact spaces can be embedded in some CN so as

    to have nontrivial polynomial hull without analytic discs?

  • Topology of Sets with Hull without Analytic Discs

    Theorem (I., Samuelsson Kalm, Wold, 2016; I., Stout 2018): Every

    smooth compact manifold of real dimension ≥ 2 smoothly embeds in

    CN for some N so as to have nontrivial polynomial hull without analytic

    discs.

    Question (Bercovici 2014): Does there exist a (nonsmooth) 1-dimensional

    manifold with nontrivial polynomial hull without analytic discs?

    A similar question was raised by Wermer (1954) but for 1-dimensional

    manifold in C2.

    Question: Which compact spaces can be embedded in some CN so as

    to have nontrivial polynomial hull without analytic discs?

    Fundamental Question: Does there exist a Cantor set with nontrivial

    polynomial hull without analytic discs?

  • Cantor Sets with Hull with Interior

    Theorem (Vitushkin 1973): There exists a Cantor set in C2 whose

    polynomial hull contains an open set of C2.

  • Cantor Sets with Hull with Interior

    Theorem (Vitushkin 1973): There exists a Cantor set in C2 whose

    polynomial hull contains an open set of C2.

    Theorem (Henkin 2006): There exists a Cantor set in C2 whose rational

    hull contains an open set of C2.

  • Cantor Sets with Hull with Interior

    Theorem (Vitushkin 1973): There exists a Cantor set in C2 whose

    polynomial hull contains an open set of C2.

    Theorem (Henkin 2006): There exists a Cantor set in C2 whose rational

    hull contains an open set of C2.

    Question: Can Henkin’s theorem be generalized to CN for N > 2?

  • Cantor Sets with Hull with Interior

    Theorem (Vitushkin 1973): There exists a Cantor set in C2 whose

    polynomial hull contains an open set of C2.

    Theorem (Henkin 2006): There exists a Cantor set in C2 whose rational

    hull contains an open set of C2.

    Question: Can Henkin’s theorem be generalized to CN for N > 2?

    Answer: Yes, but a direct generalization is not so interesting, because

    while in C2 to say z ∈ hr(X) means every analytic variety through z

    intersects X , in contrast, in CN , N > 2, hr(X) concerns only codimen-

    sion 1 analytic varieties.

  • k-Hulls

    Definition: For 1 ≤ k ≤ N , the k-rational hull hkr (X) of X is the set

    hkr (X) = {z ∈ CN : every analytic subvariety of CN of pure

    codimension ≤ k that passes through z intersects X}.

    We say that X is k-rationally convex if hkr (X) = X .

  • k-Hulls

    Definition: For 1 ≤ k ≤ N , the k-rational hull hkr (X) of X is the set

    hkr (X) = {z ∈ CN : every analytic subvariety of CN of pure

    codimension ≤ k that passes through z intersects X}.

    We say that X is k-rationally convex if hkr (X) = X .

    How to define k-polynomial hull?

  • k-Hulls

    Definition: For 1 ≤ k ≤ N , the k-rational hull hkr (X) of X is the set

    hkr (X) = {z ∈ CN : every analytic subvariety of CN of pure

    codimension ≤ k that passes through z intersects X}.

    We say that X is k-rationally convex if hkr (X) = X .

    How to define k-polynomial hull?

    Note: If z ∈ h2r(X), then for V = {p = 0} (p a polynomial), z ∈

    hr((X ∩ V )).

  • k-Hulls

    Definition: For 1 ≤ k ≤ N , the k-rational hull hkr (X) of X is the set

    hkr (X) = {z ∈ CN : every analytic subvariety of CN of pure

    codimension ≤ k that passes through z intersects X}.

    We say that X is k-rationally convex if hkr (X) = X .

    How to define k-polynomial hull?

    Note: If z ∈ h2r(X), then for V = {p = 0} (p a polynomial), z ∈

    hr((X ∩ V )).

    To define 2-polynomial hull, replace z ∈ hr((X ∩ V )) by z ∈ X̂ ∩ V .

  • k-Hulls

    Definition: For 1 ≤ k ≤ N , the k-rational hull hkr (X) of X is the set

    hkr (X) = {z ∈ CN : every analytic subvariety of CN of pure

    codimension ≤ k that passes through z intersects X}.

    We say that X is k-rationally convex if hkr (X) = X .

    Definition: For 2 ≤ k ≤ N , the k-polynomial hull X̂k of X is the set

    X̂k = {z ∈ CN : z ∈ hk−1r (X) and z ∈ X̂ ∩ V for every analytic subvariety V

    of CN of pure codimension ≤ k − 1 that passes through z}.

    We say that X is k-polynomially convex if X̂k = X .

  • k-Hulls

    Definition: For 1 ≤ k ≤ N , the k-rational hull hkr (X) of X is the set

    hkr (X) = {z ∈ CN : every analytic subvariety of CN of pure

    codimension ≤ k that passes through z intersects X}.

    We say that X is k-rationally convex if hkr (X) = X .

    Definition: For 2 ≤ k ≤ N , the k-polynomial hull X̂k of X is the set

    X̂k = {z ∈ CN : z ∈ hk−1r (X) and z ∈ X̂ ∩ V for every analytic subvariety V

    of CN of pure codimension ≤ k − 1 that passes through z}.

    We say that X is k-polynomially convex if X̂k = X .

    With these definitions

    X̂ = X̂1 ⊃ hr(X) = h1

    r(X) ⊃ X̂2 ⊃ h2r(X) ⊃ · · · ⊃ X̂

    n ⊃ hnr (X) = X.

  • Hulls without Analytic Discs

    Three Fundamental Constructions

    (i) Stolzenberg 1963: Take a limit of boundaries of analytic varieties whose

    hulls are such that their projections to the coordinate planes miss points

    of a dense set.

    (ii) Wermer 1970: Successively remove sets from the boundary of a domain

    in CN in such a way that what is left in the limit has hull without analytic

    discs.

    (iii) Wermer 1982 (based on Cole 1968): Take a limit of graphs of multivalued

    analytic functions involving square roots to get a “Riemann surface with

    an infinite number of branch points”.

  • Hulls without Analytic Discs

    Fundamental Construction (ii)

    (ii) Wermer 1970: Successively remove sets from the boundary of a domain

    in CN in such a way that what is left in the limit has hull without analytic

    discs.

  • Hulls without Analytic Discs

    Fundamental Construction (ii)

    (ii) Wermer 1970: Successively remove sets from the boundary of a domain

    in CN in such a way that what is left in the limit has hull without analytic

    discs.

    The key to (ii) is to cut out subsets with the property that a point of

    the domain lies in the rational hull of the set that remains if it does not

    lie in the polynomial hull of the set removed. One approach uses:

  • Hulls without Analytic Discs

    Fundamental Construction (ii)

    (ii) Wermer 1970: Successively remove sets from the boundary of a domain

    in CN in such a way that what is left in the limit has hull without analytic

    discs.

    The key to (ii) is to cut out subsets with the property that a point of

    the domain lies in the rational hull of the set that remains if it does not

    lie in the polynomial hull of the set removed. One approach uses:

    Lemma: Let p be a polynomial on CN and X = {ℜp ≤ 0} ∩ ∂B. (B =

    unit ball in CN ) Then X̂ = hr(X) = {ℜp ≤ 0} ∩ B.

  • Hulls without Analytic Discs

    Fundamental Construction (ii)

    (ii) Wermer 1970: Successively remove sets from the boundary of a domain

    in CN in such a way that what is left in the limit has hull without analytic

    discs.

    The key to (ii) is to cut out subsets with the property that a point of

    the domain lies in the rational hull of the set that remains if it does not

    lie in the polynomial hull of the set removed. One approach uses:

    Lemma: Let p be a polynomial on CN and X = {ℜp ≤ 0} ∩ ∂B. (B =

    unit ball in CN ) Then X̂ = hr(X) = {ℜp ≤ 0} ∩ B.

    What makes the proof of the lemma work is that ∂̂B2

    = B.

  • Hulls without Analytic Discs

    Fundamental Construction (ii)

    (ii) Wermer 1970: Successively remove sets from the boundary of a domain

    in CN in such a way that what is left in the limit has hull without analytic

    discs.

    The key to (ii) is to cut out subsets with the property that a point of

    the domain lies in the rational hull of the set that remains if it does not

    lie in the polynomial hull of the set removed. One approach uses:

    Lemma: Let p be a polynomial on CN and X = {ℜp ≤ 0} ∩ ∂B. (B =

    unit ball in CN ) Then X̂ = hr(X) = {ℜp ≤ 0} ∩ B.

    What makes the proof of the lemma work is that ∂̂B2

    = B.

    With this observation one can generalize the lemma to get a very flexible

    method of constructing hulls without analytic discs.

  • Applications

    Theorem: Any compact set X ⊂ CN with nontrivial k-polynomial hull

    (k ≥ 2) contains a subset Y with nontrivial (k − 1)-rational hull such

    that Ŷ contains no analytic discs (and P (Y ) has dense invertibles).

  • Applications

    Theorem: Any compact set X ⊂ CN with nontrivial k-polynomial hull

    (k ≥ 2) contains a subset Y with nontrivial (k − 1)-rational hull such

    that Ŷ contains no analytic discs (and P (Y ) has dense invertibles).

    Theorem: There exists a Cantor set in CN (N ≥ 2) whose (N − 1)-

    rational hull contains an open set of CN .

  • Applications

    Theorem: Any compact set X ⊂ CN with nontrivial k-polynomial hull

    (k ≥ 2) contains a subset Y with nontrivial (k − 1)-rational hull such

    that Ŷ contains no analytic discs (and P (Y ) has dense invertibles).

    Theorem: There exists a Cantor set in CN (N ≥ 2) whose (N − 1)-

    rational hull contains an open set of CN .

    Corollary: For N ≥ 2, there exists a totally disconnected, perfect set in

    CN that intersects every analytic subvariety of CN of positive dimension.

  • Applications

    Theorem: Any compact set X ⊂ CN with nontrivial k-polynomial hull

    (k ≥ 2) contains a subset Y with nontrivial (k − 1)-rational hull such

    that Ŷ contains no analytic discs (and P (Y ) has dense invertibles).

    Theorem: There exists a Cantor set in CN (N ≥ 2) whose (N − 1)-

    rational hull contains an open set of CN .

  • Applications

    Theorem: Any compact set X ⊂ CN with nontrivial k-polynomial hull

    (k ≥ 2) contains a subset Y with nontrivial (k − 1)-rational hull such

    that Ŷ contains no analytic discs (and P (Y ) has dense invertibles).

    Theorem: There exists a Cantor set in CN (N ≥ 2) whose (N − 1)-

    rational hull contains an open set of CN .

    Theorem: For N ≥ 3, there exists a Cantor set K in CN with nontrivial

    (N−2)-rational hull and whose polynomial hull contains no analytic discs

    (and such that P (K) has dense invertibles).

  • Applications

    Theorem: Any compact set X ⊂ CN with nontrivial k-polynomial hull

    (k ≥ 2) contains a subset Y with nontrivial (k − 1)-rational hull such

    that Ŷ contains no analytic discs (and P (Y ) has dense invertibles).

    Theorem: There exists a Cantor set in CN (N ≥ 2) whose (N − 1)-

    rational hull contains an open set of CN .

    Theorem: For N ≥ 3, there exists a Cantor set K in CN with nontrivial

    (N−2)-rational hull and whose polynomial hull contains no analytic discs

    (and such that P (K) has dense invertibles).

    Corollary: There exists a simple closed curve (and an arc) in C3 with

    nontrivial polynomial hull containing no analytic discs.

  • Applications

    Theorem: Any compact set X ⊂ CN with nontrivial k-polynomial hull

    (k ≥ 2) contains a subset Y with nontrivial (k − 1)-rational hull such

    that Ŷ contains no analytic discs (and P (Y ) has dense invertibles).

    Theorem: There exists a Cantor set in CN (N ≥ 2) whose (N − 1)-

    rational hull contains an open set of CN .

    Theorem: For N ≥ 3, there exists a Cantor set K in CN with nontrivial

    (N−2)-rational hull and whose polynomial hull contains no analytic discs

    (and such that P (K) has dense invertibles).

    Corollary: There exists a simple closed curve (and an arc) in C3 with

    nontrivial polynomial hull containing no analytic discs.

    Corollary: Every uncountable, compact, metrizable space of finite topo-

    logical dimension can be embedded in some CN so as to have nontrivial

    polynomial hull without analytic discs.

  • Open Question

    Does there exist a Cantor set in C2 with a nontrivial polynomial hull

    that contains no analytic discs?