Upload
inari
View
29
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Extension Response to Contaminated 2,4-DB/Peanut Problems in 2007. Eric P. Prostko*, J. Tim Flanders, and Scott N. Brown The University of Georgia. SWSS/WSSA - 2009. UGA Eric Prostko County Extension Agents Scott Brown – Colquitt Tim Flanders – Berrien Dealers Joe Dixon – Berrien - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Extension Response to Contaminated 2,4-DB/Peanut
Problems in 2007
Eric P. Prostko*, J. Tim Flanders, and Scott N. BrownThe University of Georgia
SWSS/WSSA - 2009
The Players
• UGA
– Eric Prostko
• County Extension Agents
– Scott Brown – Colquitt
– Tim Flanders – Berrien
• Dealers
– Joe Dixon – Berrien
• Growers
– At least 48
• Industry
– Jim Shue (NuFarm)
– J.W. Christiansen (Aceto)
• Private Consultant
– Tim Adcock (Diligene Technologies)
• GA Department of Agriculture
2,4-DB in Peanuts
• One of the most commonly used herbicides
• 50% of acres
• 1-3 applications/year
• From 2 WAP until 30 DBH
• Annual morningglory, sicklepod, pigweed (?)
Typical 2,4-DB Injury Symptoms
2007 Symptomology
Berrien County – Dixon FarmAugust 23, 2007 (14 DAT)
2005 2,4-DB @ 1 pt/A Butoxone 175 @ 1 pt/A
Contaminated Lots(> 250 ppm or 0.025%)
Lot # Dicamba (%) 2,4-D (%)
FB-01 0 0.294
0.091 (MCPA)
EC-16 0.170 0.110
0.079 (MCPA)
EC-16 0.198 0.104
EL-31 0 0.011
EL-31 0 0.010
EL-31 0 0.012
CE-04 0 0.006
What will 2,4-D and dicamba do to peanuts????
• Research in GA conducted over the past few years would suggest that 2 oz/A (0.778 oz ai/A) of 2,4-D would not cause many problems.– If contaminated product was applied at
24 oz/A then 2,4-D rate would only be 0.025-0.071 oz ai/A (0.03-0.09X)
What will 2,4-D and dicamba do to peanuts????• No data exists for peanut response to
dicamba.– Peanuts are more sensitive to dicamba
than 2,4-D.– Dicamba rate was equivalent to 0.041-
0.048 oz ai/A – Normal dicamba (Banvel) rate for corn
is 8 oz/A (3.08 oz ai/A)– 0.013-0.016X rate
What happened at harvest?
Table 1. Peanut Pod Numbers and Weights as Influenced by 2,4-DB formulation, Berrien County, September 14, 2007.
Sample1
Contaminated Non-Contaminated
Pods/plant 100 pod weight (g) Pods/plant 100 pod weight (g)
1 31.5 144.6 28.3 153.1
2 32.1 162.5 39.1 168.6
3 29.3 169.4 25.5 159.0
Average 31.0 158.8 31.0 160.2
1Contaminated and Non-Contaminated samples collected from same field.2Average of 10 plants.
Table 2. Peanut yield (cv. Georgia Green) as influenced by 2,4-DB formulation, P.H. Danforth Farm, Berrien County, October 12, 2007.
Sample1
Contaminated Non-Contaminated
Yield (lbs/A)
100 pod weight (g)
Yield2
(lbs/A)100 pod
weight (g)
1 4667 187.6 4619 184.1
2 4581 204.4 4849 155.4
3 4424 184.9 4302 155.8
Average 4557 192.3 4590 165.1
1Contaminated and Non-Contaminated samples collected from same field. Plot size was 6’ X 130’. 2Adjusted to 10% moisture.
Berrien County, 2007
What did the company do?
• Hired consultant to manage complaints• Information request form was mailed to all
growers• Monies were distributed based upon
comparison of 2007 yields to historical yields• Growers were happy and I was curious.• 2007 was a dry year
– May to September: -6.54” deficit
• Was yield loss due to product or dry weather?
2008 ResearchI just had to know for sure!!!!
• Small plot research
• Contaminated 2,4-DB
• 24 oz/A + COC @ 1%
• Applied at various stages (28, 45, 62, 78, 91, and 105 DAP)
• Irrigated peanuts
• Weed-free
• Twin-row
• AP-3
• Visual observations
• yield
Peanut Yield Response to Contaminated 2,4-DB, 2008
47234505
43624612
5014 5037
4588 47235002
4827
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
Time of Application (DAP)
Yie
ld (lb
s/A
) >
24 oz/A +1% Peptoil
P = 0.2142CV = 8
Peanut Pod Weights in Response to Contaminated 2,4-DB, 2008
161167
159
177
163 161 163 161172
165
0
50
100
150
200
Time of Application (DAP)
100
pods
(gra
ms)
.
24 oz/A +1% Peptoil
P = 0.3239CV = 6
100 Seed Weights in Response to Contaminated 2,4-DB, 2008
67 6762 60
68 68 6772
67
78
0
20
40
60
80
100
Time of Application (DAP)
gra
ms
.
24 oz/A +1% Peptoil
LSD 0.10 = 7CV = 9
Why is this important?
• Peanut response to dicamba
– Dicamba resistant crops are in the pipeline
– More contamination/drift problems are likely
• Dicamba/peanut tolerance studies were conducted in 7 locations in 2008 across peanut belt
Peanut Response to Clarity (dicamba) 4SC @ 16 ozs/A
Applied 30 DAP Applied 59 DAP Applied 91 DAP
Photo 107 DAP
www.gaweed.com