exposure to goose droppings

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/12/2019 exposure to goose droppings

    1/1

    091168LIS

    VIRFvdB

    RIVM National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, PO Box 1, 3720 BA Bilthoven, the Netherlands, www.rivm.com

    Dr Sabine Dittrich(1,2)

    , Dr Marion Koopmans(1)

    , Dr Ana Maria de Roda Husman(1)

    1 Centre for Infectious Disease Control Netherlands, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), The Netherlands

    2 European Public Health Microbiology Training Program (EPIET/EUPHEM), European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC),

    Sweden

    Questions and suggestions are welcome: [email protected]

    Health risk assessment of exposure to geese

    droppings in recreational waters in The NetherlandsBackgroundAdvice was sought from the RIVM by the Ministries of Agriculture and Health to assess the

    possible health risk from exposure to goose droppings in recreational areas in the Netherlands.

    A qualitative assessment of the health risk from exposure to goose droppings in recreational

    water was done in order to assist the MoH in further policy decisions. This approach was chosen

    since not enough accurate information are available for the Netherlands which would allow

    quantative estimations and modeling. Data on all aspects of the contamination chain

    (geese droppingsrecreational water public/swimmer) were collected and data gaps

    identified.

    Method Scientic literature (Pubmed) was screened for existing data on migration pattern, excreta

    and existing water pollution data. Literature was included after assessing the relevance of the

    article (abstract) in respect to the study question. Various combinations of keywords were used:

    Geese/goose/waterfowls/birds, droppings/feces/fecal contamination, cryptosporidium/giradia/

    avian influenza/contamination/pathogens. All relevant scientific publications before April 2009

    were included.

    Local experts on geese in the Netherlands were questioned on Dutch migration patterns.

    Specic information on geese numbers, fecal contamination in the Netherlands were obtained

    by using Dutch keywords like keutel, ganzen, nederlands on google.

    ResultsGeese Droppings Recreational water Public

    Geese in the Netherlands

    Wintering geese (Sep-Feb):2 million/year on agricultural land

    Breading geese (March-June):

    ~155000 / year by lakes/sea

    Flock sizes: 10-10000 birds

    Breading geese

    main source of concern

    Fecal Burdon

    Amount: ~170 fecal pellets/geese/day

    Dropping size: 0.42 g 25.4 g/dropping

    Pathogen (prevalence)

    C. parvum(81.8 - 90%)Giardia sp.(not available)

    E. hellem(8.8%)

    Campylobacter jejuni(50.2%)

    Salmonella spp.(0.8%)

    Fecal coliform bacteria (100%)

    Avian influenza Virus

    (1.8%; 0% highly pathogenic)

    Routes of contamination

    Two routes of contamination:1) Indirect contamination by fecal runoff from

    agricultural land into canals/ recreational

    sites

    2) Direct contamination by defecation into

    the water

    Health consequences of pathogens

    Gastroenteritis

    Respiratory disease/Conjunctivities (AIV)

    Survival time at 15-20C in fresh

    water

    C. parvum 3 - 12 months

    Giardia sp. max. 2 months

    E. hellemmin. 6 months

    Campylobacter jejuni 30 min. (in sunlight)

    Fecal coliform bacteria 12 - 30 days

    Avian Influenza Virus 4 days

    Infective dose (as available)

    C. parvum 8 - 1000 cystsGiardia sp. 10 oocysts

    Campylobacter jejuni 8*102bacteria

    Dutch water quality

    All recreational waters comply with EU

    regulations

    (tests for fecal contamination)

    Exposure of swimmers (water intake)

    Children: 37 ml per swim (in pools)

    Adult: 16 ml per swim (in pools)

    5.7 ml-13 ml per dive

    (occupational diver)

    SUMMARY of literature data Large numbers of geese large fecal burden

    Breeding geese might be main source of contamination.

    Large numbers of pathogens present (data not shown)

    Long survival time of pathogens

    Fecal contamination was linked to geese by molecular source tracking

    MISSING data to perform detailed quantitative microbial risk assessment:

    Detailed maps of geese numbers at specic sites no calculation using specific dilution factor

    possible.

    No data on long-lasting pathogens like Giardia sp.available for Dutch water sites.

    Detailed data on feces produced by geese in the Dutch delta are not available and available

    data are not consistent enough.

    RecommendationLarge numbers of geese at a specific bathing site have the potential to be a public health threat.

    No such risk can be scientifically proven with the data available for the Netherlands.

    No outbreaks of gastroenteritis have so far been linked to contaminations through geese

    anywhere in the world making the risk theoretical until otherwise proven. However, even if lakes

    with high geese numbers result in higher contamination, proof of an association is very difcult.

    It is recommended to monitor specific risk sites closely and perform a bathing water profile

    as described by the EU water directive (2006/7/EC).

    In addition a detailed evidence based Quantitative Microbial Risk Assessment is recommended

    including laboratory studies of pathogen load and survival time in Dutch climate.

    This would lead to a model taking run-off scenarios, varying amount of geese, meteorological

    data, dilution factors and temperature changes into account and could lead to a tool to help

    take decisions on possibly redefining recreational water sites.

    ional Institute

    Public Health

    the Environment