Upload
thomasina-fox
View
214
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Overview• Scientific motivation and opportunity
– A poorly explored portion of the observable parameter space
– A range of exciting astrophysical phenomena– Possibility of fundamental new discoveries– Technological advances and synoptic surveys
• Pilot project using DPOSS plate overlaps– A rich phenomenology of the time-variable sky
• Palomar-Quest: status and plans
• Some challenges ahead
Exploration of the Time DomainThings that go bang! in the night… New and old.
Megaflares on normal stars Optical transients
Synoptic sky surveys will require a real-time mining of massive data streams and multi-PB archives
A Systematic Search for Transients and Highly Variable Objects Using DPOSS Plate Overlaps
~ 1.5 O overlaps between adjacent plates ~ 40% of the total survey area
Effective Area Coverage in a “Snapshot” Survey:
If texp < tburst and baseline ∆t >> tburst , then
Effective Area = Useful Area Npasses Nfilters
For DPOSS: ~ 15,000 deg2 0.4 2 3 ~ 0.9 Sky
B. Granett, A. Mahabal, S.G. Djorgovski,and the DPOSS Team
Baselines from days to ~ 10 yrs, typical ~ 2-4 yrsTypical limiting mags r ~ 20, using 3 bandpasses (JFN gri)
SpectroscopicSource Identifications:
35% QSOs (1/2 radio loud)
18% CVs18% M dwarfs 6% Earlier type stars23% Unidentified (likely BL Lacs?)
DPOSS Pilot Project Conclusions:• Faint, variable sky has a very rich phenomenology
– Spectroscopic follow-up will be a key bottleneck for any synoptic sky surveys
• Most high-amplitude variable sources down to ~ 20 mag are QSOs (Blazars, OVVs…), CVs, and flaring late-type dwarfs, with some early-type stars
• Asteroids may be a significant contaminant in a search for transients
• We find many more transients (~ 103/Sky) than expected from current models for orphan afterglows.– Most of them are probably QSOs, CVs, flaring stars, and
distant SNe; some may well be afterglows; and some may be new types of phenomena
• The Palomar-Quest survey should provide a major new venue for the exploration of the time domain
The Palomar-Quest Digital Sky Survey• The Palomar-Quest Consortium: Caltech - Yale - JPL• 50% point&shoot (NEAT, M.Brown), 50% drift scan (PQ survey)• PQ survey: a fully digital successor to the historic Palomar sky
surveys; a Caltech-JPL-Yale-NCSA-… collaboration• Data rate ~ 1 TB/month; ~100 TB total; many scientific uses• VO connections and standards built in from the start; a testbed for
many new IT/ VO applications
The PQ Survey: A new, digital, synoptic sky survey using the Quest-2 112-CCD camera
at the Palomar 48” Samuel Oschin telescope
• A collaboration between Caltech, Yale/Indiana U., and NCSA/UIUC; plus collaborations with other groups (INAOE, LBL, JPL…); started in summer of 2003
• About 50% of the telescope time, driftscan mode• Now next-day (or month… processing real-time• NVO connections and standards built in from start• Repeated observations, time baselines minutes to years
• A science and technology precursor/testbed for the LSST and other major synoptic sky surveys in the future
PQ Survey Sky Coverage• Range -25°< < +30°, excluding the Galactic plane• Ultimately cover ~ 14,000 - 15,000 deg2
• Rate ~ 500 deg2/night in 4 bands• As of Jan’05, covered ~ 13,000 deg2 in UBRI, of which
~ 11,000 deg2 at least twice, and ~ 4,700 deg2 at least 4 times; and ~ 14,100 deg2 in rizz, of which ~ 11,600 deg2
at least twice, and ~ 4,200 deg2 at least 4 times
The PQ Survey Science• Large QSO and gravitational lens survey
– Tests of the concordance cosmology– Dark mattter distribution– AGN physics and evolution
• High-redshift (z ~ 4 - 6.5) QSO survey– Probes of reionization and early structure formation
• Exploring the time domain– Supernovae, GRBs, AGN, var. stars, optical transients– Surprizes and new phenomena?– Time baselines ranging from minutes (inter-CCD) to days,
months, years (repeat scans) to decades (cross-match to DPOSS, SDSS, etc.)
• Galactic structure and stellar astrophysics• Etc. etc. - think what it can do for you
Palomar-Quest Data FlowImage
ArchiveCatalogs Archive
Master ArchivePipeline
Data Proc.
Target Selection
CIT
Yale
NCSA
JPL
LBL SNF
SDSC
P48
CITData
BrokerP200
Follow-up
PQ Survey: Recent and Upcoming Developments
• Completely redoing the DRP at Caltech– Much (much!) better data cleaning– Image remapping to a standard pixel grid, to enable
image coaddition and subtraction• Using the HyperAtlas technology for this
• Using some TeraGrid resources
– Yet to come: better object detection, classification
• Next: A real-time DRP for discovery of transents and moving objects (collaborate w. JPL, M. Brown)
A Search for Low-z Supernovae
• Calibration of the SN Ia Hubble diagram• New standard candles from SN II• Endpoints of massive star evolution
C. Baltay, R. Ellis, A. Gal-Yam, S.R. Kulkarni, and the LBL SNF
(Using the image subtraction technique)
Optical Transients and Asteroids
(Exploratory work; A. Mahabal, with P. Kollipara, a Caltech undergrad)
CITData
Broker
JPLNEAT
Archive
VariablesArchive
MasterArchive
ImageArchive
Yale
AlertDecisionEngine
SourceClassification
Engine
KnownVariablesChecker
AsteroidSeparator
Engine
CITFast
Pipeline
CIT Next-Day Pipeline
NCSA
Other?LBL SNF
Website
P48
BroadcastAlert
Off-site Archives
NVO / Multi-Off-site Archives
Palomar-Quest Real-Time TransientsDiscovery System Data Flow
ComparisonEngine:
Vars./Trans.Detector
Some Challenges Ahead• Automated, reliable, adaptive data cleaning
• High volume data generators lots of glitches
• Cutting-edge systems poor stability
• High completeness / Low contamination• Must work with “solar system people” - moving
objects are the major contaminant for extra-solar-system variables and transients (and vice versa?)
• Automated, reliable event classification and alert decisions (need Machine Learning methods)– Sparse data from the event originator; folding in
heterogeneous external data; VO connections; etc.