Expert Pediatrician Exposes Vaccine Myths

8/13/2019 Expert Pediatrician Exposes Vaccine Myths

1/12

Expert Pediatrician Exposes Vaccine Myths

See http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2009/11/14/Expert-Pediatrician-Exposes-Vaccine-Myths.aspx

Dr. Larry Palevskyis a board-certified pediatrician trained at the New York Schoolof Medicine, and one of the leading physicians in the contry who, fro! !y view, is

actally able to co!pellingly and convincingly provide sond, rational, scientific

"stification as to why yo need to seriosly reconsider the wisdo! of choosing

vaccines as an option to prevent against !ost diseases.

The Difference Between What You Learn in School and What Works

Dr. Palevs!y says:

#$hen % went throgh !edical school, % was taght that vaccines were co!pletely

safe and co!pletely effective, and % had no reason to believe otherwise. &ll theinfor!ation that % was taght was pretty standard in all the !edical schools and the

teachings and scientific literatre throghot the contry. % had no reason to

disbelieve it.

'ver the years, % kept practicing !edicine and sing vaccines and thinking that !y

approach to vaccines was co!pletely onboard with everything else % was taght.

(t !ore and !ore, % kept seeing that !y e)perience of the world, !y e)perience in

sing and reading abot vaccines, and hearing what parents were saying abot

vaccines were very different fro! what % was taght in !edical school and !yresidency training.

* and it beca!e clearer to !e as % read the research, listened to !ore and !ore

parents, and fond other practitioners who also shared the sa!e concern that

vaccines had not been co!pletely proven safe or even co!pletely effective, based on

the literatre that we have today.

* %t didn+t appear that the scientific stdies that we were given were actally

appropriately designed to prove and test the safety and efficacy.

%t also ca!e to !y attention that there were ingredients in there that were notproperly tested, that the co!parison grops were not appropriately set p, and that

conclsions !ade abot vaccine safety and efficacy "st did not fit the scientific

standards that % was trained to phold in !y !edical school training.

Were Vaccines eally the !Sa"ior# $%ainst Past Diseases&

"onventional medicine teaches that the polio and the smallpox epidemics #ent a#ay$eca%se o& the vaccines' and that most o& the diseases that #e &aced in the 20 thcent%ryin the (nited )tates #ere $ro%*ht do#n $eca%se o& the po#er' stren*th and theimplementation o& the vaccine policy.

1
http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2009/11/14/Expert-Pediatrician-Exposes-Vaccine-Myths.aspxhttp://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2009/11/14/Expert-Pediatrician-Exposes-Vaccine-Myths.aspxhttp://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2009/11/14/Expert-Pediatrician-Exposes-Vaccine-Myths.aspxhttp://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2009/11/14/Expert-Pediatrician-Exposes-Vaccine-Myths.aspx


2/12

Mean#hile' there are a si*ni&icant n%m$er o& st%dies in the medical literat%re thatact%ally sho# there #ere many other reasons that these in&ectio%s diseases #ent a#ay.

+or example' one article p%$lished in 2000 in thePediatrics ornal descri$es ho#'$e&ore the ,orld ,ar ' the maority o& the in&ectio%s diseases the () #as &aced #ith

s%ch as diphtheria' tetan%s' polio' pert%ssis' measles' in&l%ena' parapert%ssis't%$erc%losis and scarlet &ever #ere all red%ced $e&ore ,orld ,ar and E+3Ethere #ere anti$iotics and vaccinations availa$le to treat or to vaccinate a*ainst thesediseases.

he reasons &or the red%ctions in incidence rates and mortality o& these diseases #erepredominantly d%e to the implementation o& p%$lic health strate*ies' incl%din*:

"lean #ater

etter livin* conditions

mproved sanitation

mproved n%trition

here are many s%ch examples.

'a"e the Proper Safety Studies $ctually Been Done&

)o' #hy is there s%ch a vast di&&erence amon* intelli*ent' scienti&ically oriented'committed and o$ective scientists and physicians a$o%t the sa&ety and e&&icacy o&vaccines5

Dr. Palevs!y says:

#% think that if yo ask !ost of !y colleages where they get their infor!ation, they

will say that they read it fro! the &!erican &cade!y of Pediatrics, fro! the &M&,

fro! the D, and in their "ornals.

(t % wold like to challenge !ost of !y colleages to look throgh the stdies

the!selves to actally see if the proper scientific stdies were done sing a proper

stdy grop and a proper control grop.

$ere the ingredients in vaccines properly stdied/

%s there a difference between being e)posed to a virs, bacteria, heavy !etal or to)in

throgh the air, food, yor intestines and yor skin, verss when it+s in"ected into

yor body/

0ave we really looked at what happens to vaccine !aterials once in"ected into a

child/ %s an antibody sfficient to provide protection for a child against disease/

More and !ore stdies are co!ing ot to show that1

2he proper stdies haven+t been done

&ntibodies are not the final way in which yor body is protected

2


3/12

2here is a difference between how children process !aterial throgh air and

food verss throgh in"ection 2here are particles in vaccines that do acc!late in yor body and case

i!pair!ents in yor i!!ne syste! 2here are particles in the vaccines that get into yor brain, and

2here are foreign DN& particles that get into yor body

3or !any health professionals it is a shock to discover that there is sch a lack of

infor!ation on the safety and efficacy, and a !onting degree of infor!ation that

actally raises sspicions abot the safety and effectiveness of vaccines, and whether

or not they have been properly stdied.

,hat #e c%rrently have is a one-sided policy6 a one #ay o& thin!in* that is impossi$leto really allo# &or the appropriate de$ate. )cience is tr%ly a &ield #here yo% as! a7%estion' yo% &ind an ans#er' and yo% don8t have the $iases or the in&l%ences thatchan*e the #ay an ans#er or a concl%sion is made. ,e are not seein* that #ithvaccines.

n a personal note' recently received the Visionary #ard at the V" con&erencein ,ashin*ton D". n my acceptance speech' $asically $ro!e do#n in tears #hen told the a%dience ho# &elt #hen came to realie that $y ro%tinely vaccinatin*tho%sands o& innocent children at my clinic' 8d pro$a$ly ca%sed dama*e to many o&them. t #as a very di&&ic%lt thin* &or me to accept intellect%ally and emotionally.

'ow a (on"entionally Trained Physician $ccepts that Vaccines (an (ause

'ar)

Dr. Palevs!y $e*an his investi*ation in earnest a$o%t 10 years a*o $eca%se parentscame to him #ith complaints' #orries' and concerns that somethin* had happened totheir children a&ter they #ere vaccinated.

nterestin*ly' this is the same #ay that $ecame enli*htened a$o%t vaccines -- thro%*hthe concern o& a very patient mother #hose &amily #as ta!in* care o&. )he *ently

persisted in sho#in* me the evidence and than! ;od listened per se.

t is simply a piece or strand o& either 3 or D. nd even o& itsel&' a vir%s can8t=do> anythin*.

n addition it is so tiny that it can only $e seen %nder an electron microscope. t ism%ch smaller than $acteria' #hich can only $e seen in the re*%lar microscope. )ovir%ses cannot $e isolated #hen yo% ma!e a viral vaccine. ll that can $e isolated isthe tiss%e' #hether it8s h%man tiss%e or animal tiss%e that is $elieved to have $eenin&ected $y that speci&ic vir%s that yo%8re tryin* to isolate.

)o #hen a viral c%lt%re or a set o& c%lt%res are made incl%din* the speci&ic vir%s'yo%8re *oin* to have the D o& people or animals #ho #ere already in&ected. hosecells are then ta!en and *ro#n on animal cells' #hether its mon!ey !idney cells orchic!en em$ryo cells.

,hen mixed to*ether' these cells #ill splice and recom$ine' #hich means that D&rom animal cells are *oin* to mix #ith D &rom the !no#n in&ected cells #ith thevir%s.

)o $y de&inition' a viral vaccine contains &orei*n animal and' even possi$ly' &orei*n

h%man D. hat8s #hy i& yo% have an e** aller*y' yo% sho%ldn8t *et certainvaccines $eca%se it is !no#n that there8s *oin* to $e e** protein in the vaccine.

C


6/12

)o the 7%estion is' ho# sa&e is it to inect viral material that is em$edded into theD o& &orei*n D cells5

,hat st%dies have $een done to act%ally test #hether &orei*n D is *ettin* into yo%r$ody6 #hether it stays in yo%r D6 #hether it *ets into yo%r $rain6 and #hether

there are &orei*n animal vir%ses that are inherently present in animal D to $e*in#ith5

The Dan%ers of $d/u"ants

d%vants are %sed in vaccines in order to create a s%&&iciently stron* imm%nolo*icalresponse. d%vants a%*ment yo%r imm%nolo*ical response.

%t there is clear evidence that ad%vants' li!e al%min%m and s7%alene impair yo%rimm%ne system.

)o #hile yo% may $e *ettin* the anti$odies desired' yo% are' at the same time'dama*in* yo%r imm%ne system. Partic%larly in children' this can set them %p todevelop chronic illness.

Pushin% for +nfor)ed (onsent

)o' does that mean yo% sho%ld never vaccinate a*ainst anythin*5

Dr. Palevs!y says:

#2hat+s so!ething that needs to be left p to the individal parent. % a! trly aproponent of infor!ed consent, and %+! trly spportive of fa!ilies who have done

their ho!ework and who have been able to !ake the choice.

$hat is the possible risk of the illness/ $hat is the possible health otco!e if yor

child gets one of those illnesses/

&nd how !ch do yo know abot those risks verss how !ch do yo know abot

the risks of the vaccines and the health otco!es of what !ay happen when children

are vaccinated against single, or even !ltiple, vaccines/

&nd when parents are given both sides, it is p to the! to !ake that infor!ed choice.

%t is no longer !y role to tell the! that they !st do this vaccine bt not that vaccine,

becase each parent has to !ake an infor!ed choice based on their nderstanding of

how diseases occr or don+t occr, what science we have available, and whether they

feel co!fortable with the devil that they know 9the science and the otco!es of

disease: verss the devil that they don+t know 9science and the otco!es of the

vaccine:.

What a-out the Swine 0lu Vaccine&

F


7/12

Echoin* many other health pro&essionals' incl%din* mysel&' Dr. Palevs!y8s concern isthat there haven8t $een s%&&icient amo%nts o& scienti&ic investi*ation to act%ally $ea$le to say that the vaccines are sa&e' or even e&&ective.

Ge says:

#Now if yo read the packaging first of the swine fl vaccine, it specifically states

that the swine fl or the 0;N; fl vaccine was !anfactred in the sa!e

!anfactring process as the fl vaccine. 2herefore since we believe that the fl

vaccine has been sfficiently tested to be safe, we can then conclde that the 0;N;

vaccine is safe.

(t the pblic shold know that even thogh or athorities are standing there and

saying that the 0;N; vaccine is safe, the proper stdies have not been done.

* &nd it+s nfair to say to parents or to the pblic that if yo co!e down with a fl-

like illness, it !st be 0;N;. %n stdies that have been done, people who did get thefl had their noses swabbed, and they were fond to have 0;N;.

$hat+s !issing in these data is a poplation of healthy people who have not had any

fl sy!pto!s 8 to actally see if their noses contained 0;N; 8 becase if so!eone is

sick and has the presence of an 0;N; virs in the nose, it doesn+t !ean that the

0;N; is casing the illness.

Yo really have to take an appropriate control grop to see if people are coloni4ed

with that virs even when they+re not sick.

So we don+t have that data< we really don+t know. % don+t think we can say with good

scientific certainty that people who are getting sick fro! the fl and who are being

diagnosed with 0;N; are actally having 0;N; as the case.

.ther Ways to Protect Yourself $%ainst the 0lu

*ain' there8s clear evidence in the medical literat%re that sho#s proper hy*iene'proper sleep' proper diet' proper s%pplementation #ith thin*s li!e vitamin D @ma!in*s%re that yo% *et yo%r vitamin D level done &irstA' and perhaps vitamin "' can act%ally

prevent yo% &rom *ettin* the &l%.

Many insist that vaccinated individ%als =protect> the %nvaccinated a*ainst the &l%vir%s in essence' reapin* the $ene&it o& the protection they re&%se &or themselves'#hile at the same time p%ttin* others in dan*er.

%t ho# does that ma!e sense5

)ays Dr. Palevs!y:

#0ow does vaccinating against the fl virs stop yo fro! carrying the fl virs in

yor nasal passages/

nd yet' this is #hat many $elieve.

H


8/12

The (oncept of 'erd +))unity 1 B2STED3

ne o& the primary ar*%ments that is $ein* %sed to %sti&y this insane $ehavior is=herd imm%nity.>

he &act is that vaccination does stop yo% &rom carryin* $acteria or vir%ses inyo%r nose' in yo%r throat' in yo%r intestines' in yo%r air#ay' on yo%r s!in' or in yo%r

$ody.

%t many do not %nderstand the si*ni&icance o& this &act' and have $een made to$elieve that i& yo%8re vaccinated' yo% #on8t carry vir%ses' and there&ore' others #ill $eprotected $eca%se yo%8re vaccinated.

s it t%rns o%t' this $elie& is $ased on scienti&ic &act.

Dr. Palevs!y explains:

#2his whole concept of herd i!!nity is very interesting, becase we were taght

that herd i!!nity occrs becase a certain percentage of a poplation gets an

active illness. 2herefore by a certain percentage of getting the active illness, they

i!part a protection onto the re!aining part of the poplation that has not gotten the

illness yet.

&nd so the herd that is getting the illness is shedding the illness and protecting those

who have not gotten it.

%n vaccine science, we are e)trapolating or conclding that if we vaccinate a certainpercentage of people, we are i!parting protection on those who have not been

vaccinated. &nd that has N'2 been shown to be tre, becase the tre herd i!!nity

in theory is based on an &2%7= D%S=&S=, and we know that despite what we+re

taght, vaccination does not !i!ic the natral disease.

So we cannot se the sa!e !odel of herd i!!nity in a natral disease in the

vaccination policy. (t nfortnately, we do se it even thogh it cannot be sed

becase it doesn+t have scientific backing.

$hat+s !ost interesting to !e is that the entire concept of herd i!!nity fails to

acknowledge that there is a life cycle of the virses and the bacteria all on their own,and that what trns the! on and off !ay have nothing to do with the percentage of

people who have been infected.

&ll yo have to do is look at the S&>S otbreak. 2hat virs that we were spposed to

fear didn+t infect ?@ or A@ percent of the poplation, which wold then i!part herd

i!!nity on the 5@ or B@ percent that didn+t get the disease.

2his is becase the virs itself had a life cycle of its own. &nd so it ca!e and went

withot any percentage of the poplation being protected. 2here wasn+t herd

i!!nity, and yet the virs died ot on its own.

I


9/12

$e fail to inclde that virses have a life cycle, and that they are in relationship to

other organis!s and to s. So!ething activates the! and so!ething actally stops

the!, and it has nothing necessarily to do with the percentage of people who wold

have the illness or who have been vaccinated.

* %t is preposteros to think that a child who is vaccinated no longer carries thebacteria or the virses that they have been vaccinated against. %f, in fact, children are

vaccinated, then why are parents and pblic health athorities afraid that non-

vaccinated children are so!ehow carrying so!ething that their children are not,

when they shold feel co!fortable that their children are vaccinated/

Yo can+t have it both ways.

Yo can+t vaccinate believing that yor children are protected and then feel that yor

children are not protected becase so!ehow, so!e non-vaccinated child is carrying

so!e secret organis! that no one else is carrying.

%t "st doesn+t !ake any sense.

The Difference -etween *atural +))unity and Vaccine4lnduced +))unity

t8s important to %nderstand that the natral illnesshas *reater in&l%ence on the healtho& yo%r $ody. )ays Dr. Palevs!y:

#%n !edical school, the !entors that % had saw children in their practices in the C@s,

6@s and all the way p to the A@s getting these fl-like illnesses who were properly

treated with rest, flids and proper spple!entation.

2hose kids had develop!ental growth sprts after the illnesses were over.

2here is so!ething to say for these viral illnesses that i!part a certain boosting of the

i!!ne syste! of yor children. &nd if we+re not letting the! have these illnesses,

what are we doing to their i!!ne syste!s/ &ren+t we actally ha!pering their

overall health/

Jo% need to %nderstand that there8s a si*ni&icant di&&erence $et#een nat%ral imm%nityand vaccination imm%nity.

,hen children are $orn' they develop nat%ral imm%nity to h%ndreds' tho%sands'millions' and even trillions o& microor*anisms that they $reathe in' eat' and to%chthro%*h their s!in. heir imm%ne systems at the linin* o& their air#ays' at the linin*o& their intestines' and on their s!in are actively protectin* their $ody &rom the o%tside#orld.

hose imm%ne systems that are intricately and speci&ically located in the linin*s arevery important to create memory and protection to the or*anisms that they contin%e to

$reathe' eat' and to%ch.

hat imm%ne system response then has a domino e&&ect on creatin* other memory andimm%ne responses that *ive yo%r $ody anti$odies and protection.

9


10/12

hat8s a very important step &or ho# the imm%ne system mat%res in o%r children.+rom the linin*s' the imm%ne system receives in&ormation' sends o%t si*nals to allother parts o& the imm%ne system' and creates an imm%ne response' memory' andanti$odies.

n the other hand' #hen yo% inect materials into yo%r $ody' yo% are $ypassin* thatcr%cial &irst step called the primary line o& de&ense.

,ith vaccination yo% are %st creatin* an anti$ody. hat does impart lon*-termimm%nity $eca%se it does not create the !ind o& memory that occ%rs #hen yo% $reatheit in' eat it' or are exposed thro%*h the s!in' and then *o thro%*h the co%rse o& thenat%ral disease.

)ome people #ill ar*%e that this is #hy #e have nasal spray vaccines.

Go#ever' a*ain' yo%8re ma!in* the ass%mption that yo% have not already $een

exposed to the vir%s at some point' and yo%8re also ma!in* the ass%mption thatexpos%re a%tomatically leads to in&ection.

Expos%re does not necessarily lead to in&ection. lot o& it has to do #ith the overallstat%s o& yo%r imm%ne system.

The Dan%ers of (o)-inin% Vaccines

ne iss%e that is &re7%ently i*nored is the potential harm &rom the syner*y o&com$inations o& vaccines' #hich have never$een st%died.

o one !no#s #hether there8s interaction $et#een the $acteria and the vir%ses in thevaccines administered as part o& the childhood vaccination sched%le' or i& there isinteraction in the trace thimerosal @#hich is still in some o& the m%lti-vials o& certainvaccinesA' or the lar*e amo%nt o& al%min%m that is in many o& them.

Dr. Palevs!y says:

#2here is a scientist na!ed (oyd 0aley, who has actally looked into so!e of the

vaccine ingredients and 9;: what happens to nerve cells when yo in"ect the! in the

lab to specific vaccine ingredients, and 95: what happens to the nerve cells when yo

keep adding another vaccine ingredient.

0e specifically showed that in the presence of thi!erosal, there+s a lot of da!age to

nerve cells. $hen yo add al!in! to the thi!erosal, yo need less thi!erosal to

create the da!age to the i!!ne and nerve cells in the presence of al!in!.

2hen when yo add neo!ycin 8 an antibiotic in so!e of the vaccines 8 it potentiates

the potency of nerve cell da!age with al!in! and !ercry together.

&nd when yo cltre the nerve cells and testosterone, verss estrogen, and yo

e)pose the! to so!e of the vaccine ingredients like thi!erosal, yo actally see that

the nerve cells that are e)posed to testosterone are !ore da!aged in greater a!ontsthan the nerve cells that are bathed in estrogen.

10


11/12

2hat raises so!e concern becase we do see that children with nerodevelop!ental

disorders are C1;, boys to girls.

So yo have to estion whether testosterone actally !akes children !ore

vlnerable to e)posre to to)ins like !ercry, al!in! or their co!bination/

None of these stdies have been done in h!ans. People say, #$e can+t do those

stdies. &nd % say, #$hy not/ 2hey say, #%t+s nethical.

% say, #$ell, if it+s nethical to do those stdies on vaccine ingredients and

co!bining the! together, then it+s nethical to give the vaccines in general.

So we+re !issing a lot of i!portant data that we won+t believe, and we+re also

!issing a lot of i!portant data that we won+t acc!late becase !ost of the stdies

that are done are by the !anfactrers of the vaccines the!selves.

$-out Dr5 Lawrence B5 Pale"sky6 M5D56 05$5$5P5

Dr. Palevs!y is a $oard certi&ied pediatrician #ho %tilies a holistic approach tochildren8s #ellness and illness. Dr. Palevs!y received his medical de*ree &rom the

J( )chool o& Medicine in 19IH' completed a three-year pediatric residency at heMo%nt )inai Gospital in J" in 1990' and served as a pediatric &ello# in theam$%latory care o%t-patient department at ellev%e Gospital' J"' &rom 1990-1991.

)ince 1991' his clinical experience incl%des #or!in* in pediatric emer*ency andintensive care medicine' in-patient and o%t-patient pediatric medicine' neonatal

intensive care medicine' ne#$orn and delivery room medicine' and conventional'holistic and inte*rative pediatric private practice at the "enter &or Gealth K Gealin*-an inte*rative and complementary care medical &acility a&&iliated #ith the eth sraelMedical "enter in J". Dr. Palevs!y is a +ello# o& the merican cademy o&Pediatrics' co-&o%nder and President o& the Golistic Pediatric ssociation@###.hpa!ids.or*A and PastPresident o& the merican Golistic Medical ssociation@###.holisticmedicine.or*A.

n his c%rrent practice in orthport' Lon* sland and Manhattan' J"' Dr. Palevs!yo&&ers cons%ltations and ed%cational pro*rams to &amilies and practitioners in theareas o& preventive and holistic health6 childhood development6 li&estyle chan*es6

n%trition &or ad%lts' in&ants and children6 sa&e' alternative treatments &or common anddi&&ic%lt to treat ac%te and chronic pediatric and ad%lt conditions6 vaccinationcontroversies6 mind&%l parentin*6 and rethin!in* the medical paradi*m.

dditionally' he teaches holistic inte*rative pediatric K adolescent medicine toparents' and medical and allied health pro&essionals' $oth nationally K internationally'and is availa$le &or spea!in* en*a*ements #orld#ide.

+or more in&ormation or to contact Dr. Palevs!y' please visit###.drpalevs!y.comorcontact info7drpale"sky5co)

elated Links8VEY +)portant Vaccine 9uestion

11
http://www.drpalevsky.com/http://www.drpalevsky.com/https://owcex01.mercola.com/owa/redir.aspx?C=2ff36e4011d643fdb485ce56de6db0ca&URL=mailto%[email protected]://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2009/09/24/VERY-Important-Vaccine-Question.aspxhttp://www.drpalevsky.com/https://owcex01.mercola.com/owa/redir.aspx?C=2ff36e4011d643fdb485ce56de6db0ca&URL=mailto%[email protected]://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2009/09/24/VERY-Important-Vaccine-Question.aspx


12/12

0lu Vaccine Exposed

Dan%ers of Excessi"e (hildhood Vaccinations

12
http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2009/09/26/Flu-Vaccine-Exposed.aspxhttp://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2009/09/26/Flu-Vaccine-Exposed.aspxhttp://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2008/04/01/the-dangers-of-excessive-childhood-vaccinations.aspxhttp://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2008/04/01/the-dangers-of-excessive-childhood-vaccinations.aspxhttp://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2009/09/26/Flu-Vaccine-Exposed.aspxhttp://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2008/04/01/the-dangers-of-excessive-childhood-vaccinations.aspx

Documents

Expert Pediatrician Exposes Vaccine Myths