Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Experimental tests of the Standard Model
0. Standard Model in a Nutshell
1. Discovery of W and Z boson
2. Precision tests of the Z sector
3. Precision test of the W sector
4. Radiative corrections and prediction of the
Higgs mass
5. Higgs searches
Literature for (2):
Precision electroweak measurement on the Z resonance,
Phys. Rept. 427 (2006), hep-ex/0509008.
http://lepewwg.web.cern.ch/LEPEWWG/1/physrep.pdf
1
0. Standard Model in a Nutshell
2
RRR
LLL
e
e
e
LH weak iso-
spin doublets
RH singlets
W )( 21
2
1i
Symmetry:
Additional fieId W3 which corresponds to the 3rd isospin operator 3.
W3 only couples to the particles of the weak isospin doublet!
In addition we have two more fields:
• Photon which couples to the LH and RH fermions with same strength.
• Z boson which couples to LH and RH fermions with different couplings gL
and gR
How can we associate the observed fields to W3?
weak isospin: T, T3
3
3,2,1iW i
,~ ii WigJiJ
Corresponding to J and J3 there are fields
321 and )(2
1WiWWW
g
BYJ
2
g
BJg
i Y
2~
convention
g, g are coupling
constants.
Additional gauge field B
Gauge field B couples to hyper-charge: Y = 2 [Q-T3]
couples to LH and RH fermions
T.Plehn
4
While the charged boson fields W correspond to the observed
W bosons, the neutral fields B and W3 only correspond to
linear combinations of the observed photon and Z boson:
WW
WW
WBZ
WBA
cossin
sincos
3
3
WW
WW
ZAW
ZAB
cossin
sincos
3
massless photon
massive Z boson
The weak mixing angle w (Weinberg angle) follows from coupling constants:
WW
eg
eg
cossin
W
W
W
Z ggg
gcos
sin
cos
Coupling to the
photon field ~e
e
e
W
Vertex factors
)1(2
1
2
5gi
e
e
Z
)(2
1
cos
5
AV
W
ggg
i
e
e
ie
Propagator
(unitary gauge)
22
2
Z
Z
Mq
Mqqg
22
2
W
W
Mq
Mqqg
2
1
q
Feynman rules
:02qW28 2
2
F
W
G
M
g
:02qZ2cos8 22
2
NC
ZW
G
M
g
22
NCF GGAssuming
universality follows 2
22cos
Z
WW
M
M
=0
= 1- =1
2
22cos
Z
WW
M
M
1. Discovery of the W and Z boson1983 at CERN SppS accelerator,
s 540 GeV, UA-1/2 experiments
1.1 Boson production in pp interactions
p
pu
d
Ws
q,
q, p
pu
u
Zs
q,
q,
XWpp XffZpp
Similar to Drell-Yan: (photon instead of W)
10 1001 ZWMs ,ˆ
)( ZW
nb1.0
nb1
nb10
12.0x mitˆqsxxs qq
22
q )GeV65(014.0xˆ sss
Cross section is small !7
1.2 Event signature:
p p
High-energy lepton pair:
222 )( ZMppm
XffZpp
GeV91ZM
8
1.3 Event signature: XWpp
p p
High-energy lepton:
Large transverse
momentum pt
Undetected :
Missing momentum
Missing pT vector
How can the W mass be reconstructed ?
9
W mass measurement
In the W rest frame:
•
•
2WM
pp
2WT M
p
Tp
Tdp
dN
2WM
In the lab system:
• W system boosted only
along z axis
• pT distribution is conserved:
maximum pT= MW / 2
Jacobian Peak:
• Trans. Movement of the W
• Finite W decay width
• W decay not isotropic
GeV80WM
21
22
4
2~ T
W
W
T
T
pM
M
p
p
dN
10
Jacobian Peak
21
22
4
2cos
cosT
W
W
T
TT
pM
M
p
dp
d
d
dN
dp
dN~
Assume isotropic decay of the W boson in its CM system:
.cos
constd
dN
(Not really correct: W boson has spin=1 decay is not isotropic!)
2sin
w
TT
M
p
p
p
2
2
2cos1
w
T
M
p
cos2~cos
2T
w
T dp
M
pd
11Jacobian
W candidate from the LHC – they still exist!
eeWdu Anti-quarks from the sea! 12
Z bosons are alos produced at the LHC
13
14
Z and W production at LHC
P.Harris,
Moriond 2011
Instead of EeT
use ET (i.e. E T)
W-boson production at LHC
15
Valence quark +
sea quark
valence quark ratio u/d = 2 more W+ than W-
ATLAS 2010:
1.4 Production of Z and W bosons in e+e- annihilation
Precision tests
of the Z sector Tests of the W sector
qqW
16
2. Precision tests of the Z sector (LEP and SLC)
21sin
32
21
21sin
34
21
21sin2
21
21
21
2
2
2
W
W
W
AV
quarkd
quarku
gg
Z
f
f
5
2
1
cos
fA
fV
w
ggig
22
2
Mq
Mqqgi
)(2
1)(
2
1AVRAVL gggggg
32
3 and sin2 TgQTg AWV
w
eg
sin
Standard Model
2
22 1
Z
ww
M
Msin
17
WW
A
V QT
Q
g
g 22
3
sin41sin21
Cross section for ffZee /
2M
2
Z
eeA
eVe
ZZZ
Z
AV
W
Z
ee
uggviMMq
Mqqgvggu
giM
uvq
gvuieM
)(2
1
)()(
2
1
cos
)()(
5
22
25
2
2
2
2
ee for
Z propagator considering a
finite Z width (real particle)
With a “little bit” of algebra similar as for M ….18
One finds for the differential cross section:
2222
2
2222
22
)()(cos
)(
)()(cos)(cos
2cos ZZZ
Z
ZZZ
ZZ
MMs
sF
MMs
MssFF
sd
d
/Z interference Z
)cos1()cos1()(cos 2222QQF e
cos4)cos1(2cossin4
)(cos 2
22 A
e
AV
e
V
WW
e
Z ggggQQ
F
cos8)cos1)()((cossin16
1)(cos 22222
44 AV
e
A
e
VAV
e
A
e
V
WW
Z ggggggggF
Vanishes at s MZ
known
e e
19
At the Z-pole s MZ Z contribution is dominant
interference vanishes
222
22222
44
2
)()()()()()(
cossin163
4
ZZZ
AVeA
eV
ww
ZtotMMs
sgggg
s
2222 )()()()(3
AV
AVeA
eV
eA
eV
FBgg
gg
gg
ggA
cos3
8)cos1(~
cos
2
FBAd
d BF
BFFBA
Forward-backward asymmetry
with
coscos
)0(1
)1(0
)( dd
dBF
20
22
12
Z
e
Z
ZZM
Ms
22
22)()(
cossin12
fA
fV
ww
Zf gg
M
i
iZ
With partial and total widths:Cross sections and widths
can be calculated within the
Standard Model if all
parameters are known
222
22222
44
2
163
4
)()()()()()(
cossin ZZZ
AV
e
A
e
V
ww
ZMMs
sgggg
s
22222 )(12)(
ZZZZ
e
MMs
s
Ms
Breit-Wigner Resonance:
BW description is very general
Z
iiiZBR )(
21
Z Resonance curve:
220
12
Z
e
ZM
Initial state Bremsstrahlung corrections
22222 )(12)(
ZZZZ
e
MMs
s
Ms
s
EzdzzszG
sm
ffff
f
21)()(
1
/4
0
)(2
Peak:
2.2 Measurement of the Z lineshape
• Resonance position MZ
• Height e
• Width Z
E
Leads to a deformation of the resonance: large (30%) effect ! 22
Resonance shape is the same, independent of final state: Propagator the same!
hadronsee ee
23
e e
e e
k k
p p
e
e e
e
k
p p
k
channel schannel t
eeee t channel contribution forward peak
Effect of t
channel
s-channel contribution ~ ( e)2
24
MZ = 91.1876 0.0021 GeV
Z = 2.4952 0.0023 GeV
had = 1.7458 0.0027 GeV
e = 0.08392 0.00012 GeV
= 0.08399 0.00018 GeV
= 0.08408 0.00022 GeV
Z = 2.4952 0.0023 GeV
had = 1.7444 0.0022 GeV
e = 0.083985 0.000086 GeV
Z line shape parameters (LEP average)
Assuming lepton
universality: e = =
3 leptons are treated
independently
23 ppm (*)
0.09 %
*) error of the LEP energy determination: 1.7 MeV (19 ppm)
http://lepewwg.web.cern.ch/ (Summer 2005)
test of lepton
universality
(predicted by SM: gA and gV
are the same)
25
LEP energy calibration: Hunting for ppm effects
Changes of the circumference of the LEP
ring changes the energy of the electrons
and thus the CM energy (shifts MZ) :
• tide effects
• water level in lake Geneva
1992 1993
Changes of LEP circumference
C=1…2 mm/27km (4…8x10-8)
ppm100
Effect of moon Effect of lake
26
Effect of the French “Train a Grande Vitesse” (TGV)
In conclusion: Measurements at the ppm level are difficult to
perform. Many effects must be considered!
Vagabonding currents from trains
27