Upload
others
View
0
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
1 M.L. Reinke, APS-DPP 2016
Experimental Pathways to Understand and Avoid High-Z Impurity Contamination from
ICRF Heating in Tokamaks
M.L. Reinke 58th Annual Meeting of the American Physical Society Division of Plasma Physics
San Jose, CA October 31st – November 4th
S.J. Wukitch, J.L. Terry, B. LaBombard, Y. Lin, J. Wright, R. Mumgaard, A. Kuang, M. Chilenski, V. Bobkov, P. Jacquet, J. Hobirk, C. Giroud, S. Menmuir and teams from
2 M.L. Reinke, APS-DPP 2016
ICRF Heating Proven, but Integration Challenge Remains • heating via Ion Cyclotron Range of Frequency
(ICRF) waves has reactor-relevant features – low-cost ($/MW), commercially available sources – existing technology spans frequency range for
high-field concepts X2,T ~ 120 MHz @ 12 T – no core density cutoff, increasing absorption
efficiency with βi
– demonstrated use for core MHD control (sawteeth) and for avoiding on-axis impurity accumulation
• decades of experience show ICRF heating linked to increased impurity contamination – critical issue H-mode tokamaks with high-Z PFCs
B.C Stratton – NF (1984) PLT
demonstrate RF antennas that can survive the plasma, and plasmas that can survive the RF
3 M.L. Reinke, APS-DPP 2016
Recent Experimental Work Demonstrates Progress In Resolving Core ICRF Impurity Contamination Problem
• examples of the ICRF impurity problem and leading explanation of the proposed mechanism(s) – sputtering via rectified sheath-induced voltages and E×B convective cells
• Alcator C-Mod and JET experimental results demonstrating impurity sources are primary concern relative to E×B convective cells
• improvements in ICRF antenna design and operation that can reduce, but do not eliminate the impurity contamination
• scoping research on SOL impurity screening that could further reduce core contamination through use of high field side antennas – sensitivity of core high-Z build-up to enhanced confinement regime
emphasis on simple experiments that demonstrate concepts and progress
4 M.L. Reinke, APS-DPP 2016
Experience with ICRF on Metallic Divertor Tokamaks M.-L. Mayoral et al 2014 Nucl. Fusion 54 033002 • ICRF impurity story on JET
– in JET-C, ICRF linked to increased Ni, and JET-ILW, ICRF linked to W despite having Be main/RF limiters
– H-mode scenarios are not dominantly RF-heated, and JET ‘lives’ with this and uses ICRF for sawtooth/impurity control
5 M.L. Reinke, APS-DPP 2016
Experience with ICRF on Metallic Divertor Tokamaks • ICRF impurity story on JET
– in JET-C, ICRF linked to increased Ni, and JET-ILW, ICRF linked to W despite having Be main/RF limiters
– H-mode scenarios are not dominantly RF-heated, and JET ‘lives’ with this and uses ICRF for sawtooth/impurity control
• ICRF impurity story on Alcator C-Mod – all high-Z (molybdenum) PFCs including
main/RF limiters + divertor – boronization required sustain H-modes at
high stored energy, keep PRAD low – decay in performance correlated with
integrated RF joules through antennas – boronization not required for I-mode (low 𝜏𝑍)
B. Lipschultz Phys. Plasmas 13,
056117 (2006)
removal of boronization
6 M.L. Reinke, APS-DPP 2016
Leading Explanation for Mechanism(s) Responsible INCREASED SOURCE
(sputtering via sheath rectified voltages) • on field lines seeing ICRF AC potential, plasma surfaces have in imbalance between e- and i+ losses due to the I-V curve
see: F. W. Perkins, Nucl. Fusion 29, 583 (1989).
7 M.L. Reinke, APS-DPP 2016
Leading Explanation for Mechanism(s) Responsible INCREASED SOURCE
(sputtering via sheath rectified voltages) • on field lines seeing ICRF AC potential, plasma surfaces have in imbalance between e- and i+ losses due to the I-V curve
• a DC potential develops to balance the losses, ~ 100 V – moves to dominant D+ sputtering
• picture can also hold off of antenna linked field lines if single pass absorption is low (far field sources)
see: F. W. Perkins, Nucl. Fusion 29, 583 (1989).
8 M.L. Reinke, APS-DPP 2016
Leading Explanation for Mechanism(s) Responsible
– DC potential to balance AC losses
INCREASED SOURCE (sputtering via sheath rectified voltages)
INCREASED TRANSPORT (radial flux via E×B convective cells)
– potential structure from antenna gives rise Eθ and Er, crossed w/ BT
– partially observed on multiple tokamaks
see: D. A. D’Ippolito, Phys. Fluids B 5 3603 (1993).
9 M.L. Reinke, APS-DPP 2016
Proposed Experiment to Decouple Sources and Transport • avoid direct measurement of complex, 3D
boundary physics phenomenon – develop a simple, repeatable, transferable test
• inject non-recycling impurities (N2) toroidally and poloidally localized to an active ICRF antenna – move puff location relative to antenna or change
active antenna (if you have more than one) – perform in L-mode, avoid confusion w/ ETB & ELMs
• measure relative change in core using single chord VUV or charge-exchange spectroscopy
• results could be followed up with validation work – ex: D2 injection on loading [Zhang – NF (2016)]
10 M.L. Reinke, APS-DPP 2016
• D(H) heating at 80 MHz in q95 ~ 4.4 plasmas at Bt=5.4 T and n/nGW ~ 0.2
• a single dipole antenna was powered and puff rotated around antenna
• N2 injected via slow capillary gas feeds and H-like nitrogen (N VII) observed by radially viewing XEUS spectrometer
C-Mod Experimental Setup
11 M.L. Reinke, APS-DPP 2016
• D(H) heating at 80 MHz in q95 ~ 4.4 plasmas at Bt=5.4 T and n/nGW ~ 0.2
• a single dipole antenna was powered and puff rotated around antenna
• N2 injected via slow capillary gas feeds and H-like nitrogen (N VII) observed by radially viewing XEUS spectrometer
• puffed on RF shots and Ohmic references – comparison shows active component and an RF
induced intrinsic source, demonstrated by O VIII – observed far SOL change in N II at gas puff
C-Mod Experimental Methods
12 M.L. Reinke, APS-DPP 2016
C-Mod Experimental Methods
• D(H) heating at 80 MHz in q95 ~ 4.4 plasmas at Bt=5.4 T and n/nGW ~ 0.2
• a single dipole antenna was powered and puff rotated around antenna
• N2 injected via slow capillary gas feeds and H-like nitrogen (N VII) observed by radially viewing XEUS spectrometer
• puffed on RF shots and Ohmic references – comparison shows active component and an RF
induced intrinsic source, demonstrated by O VIII – observed far SOL change in N II at gas puff
• use a scaled RF trace to derive correction
13 M.L. Reinke, APS-DPP 2016
C-Mod Experimental Methods
• D(H) heating at 80 MHz in q95 ~ 4.4 plasmas at Bt=5.4 T and n/nGW ~ 0.2
• a single dipole antenna was powered and puff rotated around antenna
• N2 injected via slow capillary gas feeds and H-like nitrogen (N VII) observed by radially viewing XEUS spectrometer
• puffed on RF shots and Ohmic references – comparison shows active component and an RF
induced intrinsic source, demonstrated by O VIII – observed far SOL change in N II at gas puff
• use a scaled RF trace to derive correction • corrected RF & Ohmic are nearly the same
14 M.L. Reinke, APS-DPP 2016
C-Mod Experiments Show Insensitivity to Puff Location
field line mapping of puff locations to active antenna
15 M.L. Reinke, APS-DPP 2016
Similar Experiments Conducted on JET in April 2016
• D(H) heating at 42 MHz in L-mode plasmas at q95 =4.0, Bt=2.6 T and n/nGW = 0.34
• single gas puff (outboard midplane) powering different dipole antennas, NEAR (A+B) and FAR (D) – +/- 90o phasing also checked
against standard, 180o phasing
• fully stripped nitrogen measured with charge-exchange @ r/a < 0.88 (modulating a single PINI)
results summarized in V. Bobkov, NME (2016)
16 M.L. Reinke, APS-DPP 2016
Results Show Weak Dependence on Active Antenna and Phase
(both heating phase 180o) • subsequent shots changed active RF antenna, small differences observed
• compare 𝑃𝑃 ≡ Δ𝑁𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶/Γ𝑁𝑁before and after puff and normalize – PFNEAR/PFFAR = 0.88 +/- 0.12
NEAR PUFF
FAR FROM PUFF
17 M.L. Reinke, APS-DPP 2016
Results Show Weak Dependence on Active Antenna and Phase
• subsequent shots changed active RF antenna, small differences observed
• compare 𝑃𝑃 ≡ Δ𝑁𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶/Γ𝑁𝑁before and after puff and normalize – PFNEAR/PFFAR = 0.88 +/- 0.12
• comparing different phasing also shows changes for antenna far from puff – PF+90/PF180 = 0.90 +/- 0.15 – PF-90/PF180 = 0.66 +/- 0.11
• weak, but measurable effect at -90 deg. phase, overall results similar to C-Mod
180 deg -90 deg +90 deg ALL FAR FROM PUFF
18 M.L. Reinke, APS-DPP 2016
Solutions to Core Impurity Problem Linked to Reducing Impurity Sources: The C-Mod Field Aligned Antenna • does not eliminate role of convective cells in setting antenna survivability • use novel antenna engineering and operation to reduce impurity sources
– similar focus on antenna design for impurity source reduction @ AUG [Bobkov – NF 2016]
‘Field Aligned (FA) Antenna’ 78 MHz quadrupole
straps ⊥ to magnetic field
𝑩
‘Toroidally Aligned (TA) Antenna’ two 80MHz dipoles
straps ⊥ to toroidal field
𝝓
For more information: S.J. Wukitch, PoP 20 05611 (2013) NO4.00008 (Wed. AM)
http://www-internal.psfc.mit.edu/research/alcator/pubs/index.htm
19 M.L. Reinke, APS-DPP 2016
Field Aligned Antenna Reduces But Does Not Eliminate Core High-Z Contamination
• ‘fiducial’ shots run interleaved with other experiments as integrated energy through both ICRF antennas increased after boronization – 0.7 MA, EDA H-mode which could be sustained with power from single antenna (1.7 MW) – alternated shots with long FA phase and long TA phase (8 total plasmas)
• H-modes using field-aligned antenna show consistently lower Mo than those using toroidally aligned antenna
• Mo level continues to rise in H-modes using the FA antenna – H-modes still require wall
conditioning for high performance
20 M.L. Reinke, APS-DPP 2016
Difference in Core Mo Content Linked to TA Antenna Limiter
• Mo I source at TA Limiter is higher when TA is powered and increases with integrated usage – supported by comparison with B II emission
21 M.L. Reinke, APS-DPP 2016
Difference in Core Mo Content Linked to TA Antenna Limiter
• Mo I and B II at FA limiter are similar when either TA or FA antenna is powered – rotating appears to mitigate local limiter source
22 M.L. Reinke, APS-DPP 2016
Divertor and Main Limiter Mo Sources Grow Similarly for Both Antennas
• main-chamber limiter Mo I continues to increase as boronization is removed – does not appear to
saturate, but similar source rate for each antenna
• outer divertor Mo I emission saturates, while core Mo continues to rise – good screening, consistent
w/ history [Lipschultz, 2001]
MAIN LIMITER
OUTER DIVERTOR
23 M.L. Reinke, APS-DPP 2016
Further Reduction in Core Contamination May Be Possible by Moving ICRF Antenna to High-Field Side
is the low-field side the best place for ICRF antennas? • placement on the high field side where prior work
suggests better impurity screening [McCracken, PoP (1997)]
– quiescent SOL, no ELMs or energetic ion losses – low neutral pressure allowing increased RF voltages
• reactor relevant D-T-(3He) minority heating schemes – nHe-3/ne ~ 1-2% and fICRF = 2ΩcT = ΩcHe-3
– D-T- (3He) has high single pass absorption independent of temperature helping to mitigate far field RF impurity sources
engineering challenge, motivated by physics B. LaBombard et al 2015 Nucl. Fusion 55 053020 G.M. Wallace, AIP Conf. Proc. 1689, 030017 (2015) http://www-internal.psfc.mit.edu/research/alcator/pubs/APS/APS2014/Bonoli_APS-invited_2014.pdf
put R
F an
tenn
as h
ere
24 M.L. Reinke, APS-DPP 2016
Experiments Measure Relative Screening of HFS vs. LFS Impurity Sources as Topology and Regime are Varied
1150730027
0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 Time (s)
-0.002 0.000
0.002
0.004
0.006
0.008
A U
NVII
Model * 0.00478, Tau => 0 ms
1160615014
0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 Time (s)
-0.002 0.000
0.002
0.004
0.006
0.008
A U
NVII Model * 0.101, Tau = 70 ms
• puff trace N2 from low-field side (LFS) and high field side (HFS) midplane on separate shots, measure core nitrogen evolution using VUV spectroscopy – known influx rate (𝛤𝑍) from calibrated puffs into empty vacuum vessel – comparing the same plasma, compare penetration factors (𝑃𝑃) from VUV spec.
𝝏𝝏𝝏𝝏𝝏
= 𝑷𝑷 ∙ 𝚪𝝏 −𝝏𝝏𝝉𝝏
𝝏𝝏 𝝏 = 𝑷𝑷 ∙ 𝒎𝒎𝒎𝒎𝒎 𝝏
𝒎𝒎𝒎𝒎𝒎 𝝏 = 𝒎−𝝏/𝝉𝝏 𝚪𝝏𝒎𝒔/𝝉𝒛𝝏𝒔𝝏
𝟎
𝝏𝑽𝑽𝑽 𝝏 = 𝑷𝑷𝑽𝑽𝑽 ∙ 𝒎𝒎𝒎𝒎𝒎(𝝏)
N VII from XEUS
EDA H-mode
Ohmic
N2 GAS PUFF
N2 GAS PUFF 𝜏𝑍 from CaF2 laser ablation
25 M.L. Reinke, APS-DPP 2016
Ohmic Screening Experiments Demonstrate Important Balance Between Parallel Flows and E×B Flows in SOL • HFS impurities up to ~x5
better screened than LFS • poorest HFS screening does
not occur in DN • results show effects, which
can compete or add – strong LFS→HFS flows
(measured with probes) – dispersal via E×B drift
(from N V emission patterns)
• new Rev. B discharges confirm hypothesis, showing screening at SSEP=-5 mm
LFS puff
HFS puff
more details see: B. LaBombard – NME (2016) http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nme.2016.10.006
26 M.L. Reinke, APS-DPP 2016
Screening Strongly Depends on Confinement Regime • in I-mode, factor of ~2 better
screening on HFS vs. LFS • E×B works w/ parallel flows
I-mode EDA H-mode
• EDA H-mode, larger E×B drift • in favorable topology, HFS
screening is much worse?
see: B. LaBombard IAEA (2016)
27 M.L. Reinke, APS-DPP 2016
Conclusions and Implications • N2 gas puff experiments demonstrate RF-induced sources are more important than RF-
driven E×B convective cells for high-Z contamination – empirical approach on JET and Alcator C-Mod, transferable to other devices
• innovative design of ICRF antennas, such as field aligning, helps reduce antenna limiter sources, but does eliminate issue of core high-Z build-up – in C-Mod EDA H-modes boronization still required to constrain core Mo levels
• further reduction may be possible by locating ICRF antennas on the high field side, gas puff experiments allow impurity screening to be explored – balance of parallel and ExB flows controls penetration factors, which depends on
topology and confinement regime
• results combine to form design criteria for the use of ICRF in devices which will be unable to use wall conditioning techniques and will rely more heavily on ICRF (WEST, ITER, high-field tokamak concepts)
• also demonstrate progress in solving a long-standing problem linked to ICRF using simple experimental tests to gain further insight into important physics mechanisms