57
Experimental Design Playing with variables

Experimental Design Playing with variables The nature of experiments allow the investigator to control the research situation so that causal relationships

  • View
    219

  • Download
    1

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Experimental Design Playing with variables The nature of experiments allow the investigator to control the research situation so that causal relationships

Experimental Design

Playing with variables

Page 2: Experimental Design Playing with variables The nature of experiments allow the investigator to control the research situation so that causal relationships

The nature of experiments

allow the investigator to control the research situation so that causal relationships among variables may be evaluated

One variable is manipulated and its effect upon another variable is measured, while other variables are held constant

Page 3: Experimental Design Playing with variables The nature of experiments allow the investigator to control the research situation so that causal relationships

So… you’ve decided to do an experiment

Decisions… decisions… decisions

Page 4: Experimental Design Playing with variables The nature of experiments allow the investigator to control the research situation so that causal relationships

Decision 1: Independent Variable?

value is changed or altered independently of other variables

hypothesized to be the causal influence categorical or continuous (?)

Experimental Treatments: alternative manipulations of the

Independent Variable

Page 5: Experimental Design Playing with variables The nature of experiments allow the investigator to control the research situation so that causal relationships

Experimental and Control Groups Control Group

Experimental Groups

there can be more than one treatment level of the Independent Variable (basic or factorial)

there can be more than one IV

0

5

10

15

20

25

Control Exp 3

IVtreatment

Experimental Groups

Page 6: Experimental Design Playing with variables The nature of experiments allow the investigator to control the research situation so that causal relationships

Decision 2: Dependent Variable

The criterion or standard by which the results are judged

It is presumed that changes in the Dependent Variable are the result of changes in one or more Independent Variable

the choice of Dependent Variable determines the type of answer that is given to the research question

Page 7: Experimental Design Playing with variables The nature of experiments allow the investigator to control the research situation so that causal relationships

Decision 3: Test units/unit of analysis The subjects or entities whose

responses to the experimental treatment are being measured

People are the most common test unit in business research

Page 8: Experimental Design Playing with variables The nature of experiments allow the investigator to control the research situation so that causal relationships

Decision 4: Extraneous variables

A number of extraneous or “other” variables may affect the dependent variable and distort the results

Conditions of constancy: When extraneous variables cannot be

eliminated we strive to hold Extraneous Variables constant for all subjects

Page 9: Experimental Design Playing with variables The nature of experiments allow the investigator to control the research situation so that causal relationships

But, what about ___________?

Problems… problems…

Page 10: Experimental Design Playing with variables The nature of experiments allow the investigator to control the research situation so that causal relationships

IMPACT OF THE RESEARCH SITUATION

Demand Characteristics: experimental design procedures that unintentionally hint to subjects about the experimenter’s hypothesis

rumour instructions status and personality of researcher unintentional cues from experimenter experimental procedure itself Setting: Field versus Laboratory

Page 11: Experimental Design Playing with variables The nature of experiments allow the investigator to control the research situation so that causal relationships

Field versus Laboratory Field experiments: usually used to

fine-tune strategy and determine sales volume

Laboratory: used when control over the experimental setting is more important

Page 12: Experimental Design Playing with variables The nature of experiments allow the investigator to control the research situation so that causal relationships

Experimental Design effects….

Page 13: Experimental Design Playing with variables The nature of experiments allow the investigator to control the research situation so that causal relationships

The Hawthorne effectSubjects perform differently just because they know they are are experimental subjects

Western Electric’s Hawthorne Plant 1939 study of light intensity

The Guinea Pig effectexhibit the behaviour that they think is expected

Potential Solutions:

run experiment for a longer period

use a control group

Deception (?)

Page 14: Experimental Design Playing with variables The nature of experiments allow the investigator to control the research situation so that causal relationships

Experimental Treatment Diffusion

if treatment condition perceived as very desirable relative to the control condition, members of the control group may seek access to the treatment condition

Potential Solutions:-have control group in another site

-of course, this introduces new variables!

Page 15: Experimental Design Playing with variables The nature of experiments allow the investigator to control the research situation so that causal relationships

John Henry Effect

legend of black railway worker control group overcompensates

Potential Solutions: don’t do threatening experiments don’t set up obviously competitive situations don’t tell control group that they are control group

• conduct in another location somewhere else

• unfortunately, produces new variable of different location, neighbourhood, etc.!

Page 16: Experimental Design Playing with variables The nature of experiments allow the investigator to control the research situation so that causal relationships

Resentful Demoralization of Control Group Control group artificially demoralized if perceives

experimental group receiving desirable treatment being withheld from it

Potential Solutions? what about giving control group some perk to compensate? don’t tell them they are control group! (but what about

informed consent?)… Use of Placebo… use of blinding…

Page 17: Experimental Design Playing with variables The nature of experiments allow the investigator to control the research situation so that causal relationships

Getting control….

Design decisions

Page 18: Experimental Design Playing with variables The nature of experiments allow the investigator to control the research situation so that causal relationships

Physical Control– Holding the value or level of extraneous

variables constant throughout the course of an experiment.

Statistical Control– Adjusting for the effects of confounding

variables by statistically adjusting the value of the dependent variable for each treatment conditions.

Design Control– Use of the experimental design to control

extraneous causal factors.

Page 19: Experimental Design Playing with variables The nature of experiments allow the investigator to control the research situation so that causal relationships

• Blinding is utilized to control subjects knowledge of whether or not they have been given a particular experimental treatment

• double-blind experiment

• secrecy • but then violate principle of informed consent

• screen out or balance number of placebo reactors in treatment & control groups

Blinding

Page 20: Experimental Design Playing with variables The nature of experiments allow the investigator to control the research situation so that causal relationships

Sampling

Who and HowAnd How to Screw It up

Page 21: Experimental Design Playing with variables The nature of experiments allow the investigator to control the research situation so that causal relationships

Terms Sample Population (universe) Population element census

Page 22: Experimental Design Playing with variables The nature of experiments allow the investigator to control the research situation so that causal relationships

Why use a sample? Cost Speed Sufficiently accurate (decreasing

precision but maintaining accuracy) More accurate than a census (?) Destruction of test units

Page 23: Experimental Design Playing with variables The nature of experiments allow the investigator to control the research situation so that causal relationships

Stages in the Selection of a Sample

Step 1: Define thethe target population

Step 2: SelectThe Sampling

Frame

Step 3: ProbabilityOR Non-probability?

Step 4: PlanSelection of

samplingunits

Step 5: DetermineSample Size

Step 6: SelectSampling units

Step 7: ConductFieldwork

Page 24: Experimental Design Playing with variables The nature of experiments allow the investigator to control the research situation so that causal relationships

Step 1: Target Population The specific, complete group

relevant to the research project Who really has the information/data

you need How do you define your target

population

Page 25: Experimental Design Playing with variables The nature of experiments allow the investigator to control the research situation so that causal relationships

Bases for defining the population of interest include: • Geography• Demographics• Use• Awareness

Page 26: Experimental Design Playing with variables The nature of experiments allow the investigator to control the research situation so that causal relationships

Operational Definition

A definition that gives meaning to a concept by specifying the activities necessary to measure it. “The population of interest is defined as

all women in the City of Lethbridge who hold the most senior position in their organization.”

What variables need further definition?

Page 27: Experimental Design Playing with variables The nature of experiments allow the investigator to control the research situation so that causal relationships

Step 2: Sampling Frame

The list of elements from which a sample may be drawn. Also known as: working population. Examples?

Page 28: Experimental Design Playing with variables The nature of experiments allow the investigator to control the research situation so that causal relationships

Sampling Frame Error:

error that occurs when certain sample elements are not listed or available and are not represented in the sampling frame.

Page 29: Experimental Design Playing with variables The nature of experiments allow the investigator to control the research situation so that causal relationships

Sampling Units:

A single element or group of elements subject to selection in the sample. Primary sampling unit Secondary sampling unit

Page 30: Experimental Design Playing with variables The nature of experiments allow the investigator to control the research situation so that causal relationships

Error: Less than perfectly.representative samples.

Random sampling error. Difference between the result of a sample and

the result of a census conducted using identical procedures; a statistical fluctuation that occurs because of chance variation in the selection of the sample.

Page 31: Experimental Design Playing with variables The nature of experiments allow the investigator to control the research situation so that causal relationships

…Error

Systematic or non-sampling error. Results from some imperfect aspect of

the research design that causes response error or from a mistake in the execution of the research

Examples: Sample bias, mistakes in recording responses, non-responses, mortality etc,.

Page 32: Experimental Design Playing with variables The nature of experiments allow the investigator to control the research situation so that causal relationships

…Error

Non-response error. The statistical difference between a

survey that includes only those who responded and a survey that also includes those that failed to respond.

Page 33: Experimental Design Playing with variables The nature of experiments allow the investigator to control the research situation so that causal relationships

Step 3: Choice! Probability Sample:

A sampling technique in which every member of the population will have a known, nonzero probability of being selected

Page 34: Experimental Design Playing with variables The nature of experiments allow the investigator to control the research situation so that causal relationships

Step 3: Choice! Non-Probability Sample:

Units of the sample are chosen on the basis of personal judgment or convenience

There are no statistical techniques for measuring random sampling error in a non-probability sample. Therefore, generalizability is never statistically appropriate.

Page 35: Experimental Design Playing with variables The nature of experiments allow the investigator to control the research situation so that causal relationships

Classification of Sampling Methods

SamplingMethods

ProbabilitySamples

SimpleRandom

Cluster

Systematic Stratified

Non-probability

QuotaJudgment

Convenience Snowball

Page 36: Experimental Design Playing with variables The nature of experiments allow the investigator to control the research situation so that causal relationships

Probability Sampling Methods

Simple Random Sampling the purest form of probability sampling. Assures each element in the population

has an equal chance of being included in the sample

Random number generators

Probability of Selection = Sample Size

Population Size

Page 37: Experimental Design Playing with variables The nature of experiments allow the investigator to control the research situation so that causal relationships

Advantages minimal knowledge of population needed External validity high; internal validity

high; statistical estimation of error Easy to analyze data

Disadvantages High cost; low frequency of use Requires sampling frame Does not use researchers’ expertise Larger risk of random error than stratified

Page 38: Experimental Design Playing with variables The nature of experiments allow the investigator to control the research situation so that causal relationships

Systematic Sampling An initial starting point is selected by a

random process, and then every nth number on the list is selected

n=sampling intervalThe number of population elements

between the units selected for the sample

Error: periodicity- the original list has a systematic pattern

?? Is the list of elements randomized??

Page 39: Experimental Design Playing with variables The nature of experiments allow the investigator to control the research situation so that causal relationships

Advantages Moderate cost; moderate usage External validity high; internal validity

high; statistical estimation of error Simple to draw sample; easy to verify

Disadvantages Periodic ordering Requires sampling frame

Page 40: Experimental Design Playing with variables The nature of experiments allow the investigator to control the research situation so that causal relationships

Stratified Sampling Sub-samples are randomly drawn from

samples within different strata that are more or less equal on some characteristic

Why? Can reduce random error

More accurately reflect the population by more proportional representation

Page 41: Experimental Design Playing with variables The nature of experiments allow the investigator to control the research situation so that causal relationships

How?1.Identify variable(s) as an efficient basis

for stratification. Must be known to be related to dependent variable. Usually a categorical variable

2.Complete list of population elements must be obtained

3.Use randomization to take a simple random sample from each stratum

Page 42: Experimental Design Playing with variables The nature of experiments allow the investigator to control the research situation so that causal relationships

Types of Stratified SamplesProportional Stratified Sample:

The number of sampling units drawn from each stratum is in proportion to the relative population size of that stratum

Disproportional Stratified Sample: The number of sampling units drawn

from each stratum is allocated according to analytical considerations e.g. as variability increases sample size of stratum should increase

Page 43: Experimental Design Playing with variables The nature of experiments allow the investigator to control the research situation so that causal relationships

Types of Stratified Samples…Optimal allocation stratified sample:

The number of sampling units drawn from each stratum is determined on the basis of both size and variation.

Calculated statistically

Page 44: Experimental Design Playing with variables The nature of experiments allow the investigator to control the research situation so that causal relationships

Advantages Assures representation of all groups in

sample population needed Characteristics of each stratum can be

estimated and comparisons made Reduces variability from systematic

Disadvantages Requires accurate information on

proportions of each stratum Stratified lists costly to prepare

Page 45: Experimental Design Playing with variables The nature of experiments allow the investigator to control the research situation so that causal relationships

Cluster Sampling The primary sampling unit is not the

individual element, but a large cluster of elements. Either the cluster is randomly selected or the elements within are randomly selected

Why? Frequently used when no list of population available or because of cost

Ask: is the cluster as heterogeneous as the population? Can we assume it is representative?

Page 46: Experimental Design Playing with variables The nature of experiments allow the investigator to control the research situation so that causal relationships

Cluster Sampling example You are asked to create a sample of all

Management students who are working in Lethbridge during the summer term

There is no such list available Using stratified sampling, compile a list of

businesses in Lethbridge to identify clusters

Individual workers within these clusters are selected to take part in study

Page 47: Experimental Design Playing with variables The nature of experiments allow the investigator to control the research situation so that causal relationships

Types of Cluster SamplesArea sample:

Primary sampling unit is a geographical area

Multistage area sample: Involves a combination of two or more

types of probability sampling techniques. Typically, progressively smaller geographical areas are randomly selected in a series of steps

Page 48: Experimental Design Playing with variables The nature of experiments allow the investigator to control the research situation so that causal relationships

Advantages Low cost/high frequency of use Requires list of all clusters, but only of

individuals within chosen clusters Can estimate characteristics of both cluster and

population For multistage, has strengths of used methods

Disadvantages Larger error for comparable size than other

probability methods Multistage very expensive and validity depends

on other methods used

Page 49: Experimental Design Playing with variables The nature of experiments allow the investigator to control the research situation so that causal relationships

Classification of Sampling Methods

SamplingMethods

ProbabilitySamples

SimpleRandom

Cluster

Systematic Stratified

Non-probability

QuotaJudgment

Convenience Snowball

Page 50: Experimental Design Playing with variables The nature of experiments allow the investigator to control the research situation so that causal relationships

Non-Probability Sampling Methods

Convenience Sample The sampling procedure used to obtain

those units or people most conveniently available

Why: speed and cost External validity? Internal validity Is it ever justified?

Page 51: Experimental Design Playing with variables The nature of experiments allow the investigator to control the research situation so that causal relationships

Advantages Very low cost Extensively used/understood No need for list of population elements

Disadvantages Variability and bias cannot be measured

or controlled Projecting data beyond sample not

justified.

Page 52: Experimental Design Playing with variables The nature of experiments allow the investigator to control the research situation so that causal relationships

Judgment or Purposive Sample The sampling procedure in which an

experienced research selects the sample based on some appropriate characteristic of sample members… to serve a purpose

Page 53: Experimental Design Playing with variables The nature of experiments allow the investigator to control the research situation so that causal relationships

Advantages Moderate cost Commonly used/understood Sample will meet a specific objective

Disadvantages Bias! Projecting data beyond sample not

justified.

Page 54: Experimental Design Playing with variables The nature of experiments allow the investigator to control the research situation so that causal relationships

Quota Sample The sampling procedure that ensure that

a certain characteristic of a population sample will be represented to the exact extent that the investigator desires

Page 55: Experimental Design Playing with variables The nature of experiments allow the investigator to control the research situation so that causal relationships

Advantages moderate cost Very extensively used/understood No need for list of population elements Introduces some elements of stratification

Disadvantages Variability and bias cannot be measured

or controlled (classification of subjects0 Projecting data beyond sample not

justified.

Page 56: Experimental Design Playing with variables The nature of experiments allow the investigator to control the research situation so that causal relationships

Snowball sampling The sampling procedure in which the

initial respondents are chosen by probability methods, and then additional respondents are obtained by information provided by the initial respondents

Page 57: Experimental Design Playing with variables The nature of experiments allow the investigator to control the research situation so that causal relationships

Advantages low cost Useful in specific circumstances Useful for locating rare populations

Disadvantages Bias because sampling units not

independent Projecting data beyond sample not

justified.