15
Experience with CMLD in a Practical SOL Application DOE-NERC FIDVR & Dynamic Load Modeling Conference Alexandria, VA October 1, 2015 Robert J. O’Keefe American Electric Power

Experience with CMLD in a Practical SOL Application · Experience with CMLD in a Practical SOL Application DOE-NERC FIDVR & Dynamic Load Modeling Conference Alexandria, VA October

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    0

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Experience with CMLD in a Practical SOL Application · Experience with CMLD in a Practical SOL Application DOE-NERC FIDVR & Dynamic Load Modeling Conference Alexandria, VA October

Experience with CMLD in a Practical SOL Application

DOE-NERC FIDVR & Dynamic Load Modeling Conference

Alexandria, VAOctober 1, 2015

Robert J. O’KeefeAmerican Electric Power

Page 2: Experience with CMLD in a Practical SOL Application · Experience with CMLD in a Practical SOL Application DOE-NERC FIDVR & Dynamic Load Modeling Conference Alexandria, VA October

Load Area Overview

G G

345 kV 345 kV

138 kV138 kV

138 kV

G138-69 kV Network

120 miles to interconnected system

100 miles to another load area

Page 3: Experience with CMLD in a Practical SOL Application · Experience with CMLD in a Practical SOL Application DOE-NERC FIDVR & Dynamic Load Modeling Conference Alexandria, VA October

Single-Phase A/C ComponentSensitivity

5% increase in D-component shows following effects on area import limits:

Non-fault initiated generating plant trip150 mw decrease in limit based on avoiding voltage collapse

345 kV transmission line fault and trip200 mw decrease in limit based on avoiding UVLS operations500 mw decrease in limit based on avoiding transient instability

Page 4: Experience with CMLD in a Practical SOL Application · Experience with CMLD in a Practical SOL Application DOE-NERC FIDVR & Dynamic Load Modeling Conference Alexandria, VA October

CMLD Issues

1. Question about effect of D-component Tstall value as voltage decreases below Vstall

2. Question about tripping of stalled A, B, and C components as their speed reaches zero

3. Question on representation of D-component stalling and associated FIDVR effect

These issues encountered in attempt to calculatestability import limits for load area

Page 5: Experience with CMLD in a Practical SOL Application · Experience with CMLD in a Practical SOL Application DOE-NERC FIDVR & Dynamic Load Modeling Conference Alexandria, VA October

2-Bus Test Case

• Set controllable voltage source on bus 1; CMLD on bus 2

• Ramp voltage source down / up or apply fault

• View CMLD P&Q vs V or T

Page 6: Experience with CMLD in a Practical SOL Application · Experience with CMLD in a Practical SOL Application DOE-NERC FIDVR & Dynamic Load Modeling Conference Alexandria, VA October

EPRI CMLD Data, D-Component = 100%Steady-State P,Q vs V Characteristics

Transition to Stall Mode

P

Q

Transition to Stall Mode

P

Q

Page 7: Experience with CMLD in a Practical SOL Application · Experience with CMLD in a Practical SOL Application DOE-NERC FIDVR & Dynamic Load Modeling Conference Alexandria, VA October

EPRI CMLD DataSteady-State P,Q vs V Characteristics

Transition to Stall Mode

C-Component 100% Stall/Trip

P

Q

D-component Transition to Stall Mode

C-component 100% Stall/Trip

P

Q

Page 8: Experience with CMLD in a Practical SOL Application · Experience with CMLD in a Practical SOL Application DOE-NERC FIDVR & Dynamic Load Modeling Conference Alexandria, VA October

EPRI CMLD Data, D-Component = 0%Steady-State P,Q vs V Characteristics

P

Q

C-component stalls but does not tripC-component stalls

but does not trip

P

Q

Page 9: Experience with CMLD in a Practical SOL Application · Experience with CMLD in a Practical SOL Application DOE-NERC FIDVR & Dynamic Load Modeling Conference Alexandria, VA October

EPRI CMLD Data, D-Component = 100%Tstall = .033

P

Q

V infinite bus

V load bus

V infinite bus

P

QV load bus

Page 10: Experience with CMLD in a Practical SOL Application · Experience with CMLD in a Practical SOL Application DOE-NERC FIDVR & Dynamic Load Modeling Conference Alexandria, VA October

EPRI CMLD Data, D-Component = 100%Tstall = 999

P

Q

V infinite bus

V load bus

P

Q

V infinite bus

V load bus

Page 11: Experience with CMLD in a Practical SOL Application · Experience with CMLD in a Practical SOL Application DOE-NERC FIDVR & Dynamic Load Modeling Conference Alexandria, VA October

EPRI CMLD Data, D-Component = 100%Vstall = 0.10

Page 12: Experience with CMLD in a Practical SOL Application · Experience with CMLD in a Practical SOL Application DOE-NERC FIDVR & Dynamic Load Modeling Conference Alexandria, VA October

PSS/E Implementation Questions

What is supposed to be D-component state below Vstall and before Tstall timer times out?

Is this an artificial question arising from the performance (static-empirical) model?

What is supposed to happen to A, B, and C components should their speed reach zero?

Trip or stay energized?

Page 13: Experience with CMLD in a Practical SOL Application · Experience with CMLD in a Practical SOL Application DOE-NERC FIDVR & Dynamic Load Modeling Conference Alexandria, VA October

Single-Phase A/C StallingNon-Modeled Factors

• Point-on-wave variability considering three 120-degree displaced phases

• Distance from fault / dependency on rate of voltage drop

Does it make sense to attenuateD-component stall effect somehow?

Interim Remedies Rejected:-Disable stall mode by increasing Tstall or decreasing Vstall-Increase Rstall and Xstall, and perhaps Vstall

Page 14: Experience with CMLD in a Practical SOL Application · Experience with CMLD in a Practical SOL Application DOE-NERC FIDVR & Dynamic Load Modeling Conference Alexandria, VA October

EPRI CMLD DataP,Q vs V Trajectories of a Load Bus from Simulation of

Generator trip & Sudden Voltage Collapse

P

Q

P

Q

Page 15: Experience with CMLD in a Practical SOL Application · Experience with CMLD in a Practical SOL Application DOE-NERC FIDVR & Dynamic Load Modeling Conference Alexandria, VA October

Other CMLD Advice

Network non-convergence associated with CMLD model may cause simulations to drift

Have found it necessary to decrease the acceleration factors to 0.25 or less to avoid non-convergence in most cases