Exercise 1 Reckoning

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/3/2019 Exercise 1 Reckoning

    1/1

    Charles Wang WTE

    Prof. Mischkot 10.15.11

    Exercise 1 Reckoning

    William J. Cronons,The Trouble with Wilderness, is an essay that tells readers to re-evaluate

    our view of the wilderness. He describes how the word wilderness itself has changed from one of

    waste and barbarianism to something sublime. Natural landscapes became sacred because of the

    emotion of awe it evoked and how it made travelers feel closer to God. Wilderness is also described as the

    frontier, which created the sense of individualism because it gave the travelers in the American West

    the ability to re-create the cultural and individual way of life. Following the end of the frontier, people

    became concerned with the loss of something so American, that wilderness parks were made. Cronons

    description of the sublime and the frontier opens the eyes to the reader of the history of why we

    romanticize the wilderness, telling us that our wonderment comes from cultural fabrications and not our

    natural instincts. Because of the cultural manipulation to societys description of wilderness, we tend to

    value some places of wilderness over others, allowing us to believe that some places are genuinely wild

    while some places are not at all. Cronon wants us, the readers, to realize that nature is everywhere, and

    human beings are part of it despite the cities they build and live in. It is only through our recognition that

    nature is connected with humanity that ecological problems may not occur, and that the two can co-exist

    without conflicts.

    Henry David Thoreau seems to be the type of person that Cronon would described as falling intosocieties description of the wilderness during the nineteenth century. In his essay Why I went to the

    Woods, Thoreau describes how people should start to live life more simply, to care for what is crucial,

    and to forget anything trivial. Although his main point is different from Cronon, there is some conflict

    because of his belief that going into the wild will clarify his points. Cronon would criticize Thoreau for

    even making a distinction between civilization and nature. Thoreaus need to move away from society

    and live with nature to discover a simpler way to live life is his way of romanticizing the wilderness.

    Cronon would argue that it is Thoreau conception of wilderness, not the wilderness itself that allows

    Thoreau to write what he wants.

    Both author however seems to have a preference of conservation. Cronon wants humans to

    realize that they are a part of nature in order to allow us to remedy ecological problems easily. Thoreau

    indirectly supports nature, by describing the benefits of living simply, which only comes from being away

    from civilization.