Upload
vudiep
View
217
Download
2
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
SPONSORED BY
Aerospace and defense executives from the Americas and Europe met June 4-6 for the fourth annual Aviation Week Executive Summit in Denver. Sponsored by Siemens PLM Software, the Summit focused on the challenges presented by a dramatic increase in production required for the civil aviation sector, new successes for the industry manned space program, and equally dramatic drawdowns in funding for NASA and the Defense Dept. The summit opened with a keynote by Norm Augustine, Chairman Emeritus of Lockheed Martin Corp. Augustine revisited his now legendary tome, the 1982 publication of “Augustine’s Laws.” Other speakers included the Honorable Kenneth J. Krieg, former Undersecretary of Defense AT&L and founder of Samford Global; David Shook, SVP and Managing Director Americas for Siemens PLM Software; Phil Dunford, Chairman of the American Helicopter Society and Chief Operations Executive of Boeing Military Aircraft; Joel Cawley, IBM’s Corp VP Strategy and Enterprise Initiatives; Jean Botti, Chief Technology Officer for EADS; Eric Roegner, President ALCOA Forgings and Extrusions; Gina Burns, Chair of AIA’s Workforce Committee; and Jennifer Pollino, EVP, Goodrich Corp.
The Summit brings together those who have attended Aviation Week’s Executive Roundtables throughout the year. The focus during 2012 was on
2012 Executive Summit:
Renewing the Laws for a New Era
Carole Rickard Hedden Denver, CO June 4-‐6, 2012
2 SPONSORED BY
reviewing Augustine’s Laws and also challenging the participants to develop new laws that reflect the current environment and guides to how industry can build during the coming years. To write the laws, the interactive discussions built on presentations by the speakers in four key areas: Analyze Create Make/Sustain Who Since 2004, the Aviation Week Executive Roundtable has brought together leaders from across industry and the government to discuss the most pressing issues most pressing in assuring delivery of quality systems to end-users. Action is the desired outcome for the event, and among the actions outlined by the group was a rebranding and marketing initiative directed toward current and future A&D employees – and utilized outside of the Washington DC environment using new and established media. Greg Hamilton, Aviation Week’s President, and Tony Velocci, Editor in Chief, will convene a working group on this action. The second action was to revisit Augustine’s Laws and develop a new set geared to the current economic, technological and global environment. Aerospace and Defense 21st Century Laws Law 1: If you want “A List” people, you must have “a List” supervisors/leaders. - Matrix organizations make this a
challenge, but everyone needs to know where to go for constructive feedback and functional expertise.
Law 2: Lead with a light touch. – Delegate, empower, hold accountable,
allow failure.
Law 3: Respect n = f (respect “out”)
Bring together the industry’s best, brightest and most forward-thinking leaders. Stir in provocative presentations from inside/outside the industry. Develop new laws for a new era.
3 SPONSORED BY
Law 4: People are not interchangeable parts. - A pair of hands comes with a brain (and a heart).
Law 5: Cool work – BS + Respect > Compensation (cool work minus the BS plus respect is greater than/equal to compensation) Law 6: Your expectation of your employees is a self-fulfilling prophecy. Law 7: A little (visible) recognition goes a long way.
Law 8: In a culture of innovation, the only rules you cannot break are the known laws of physics. Law 9: The speed of innovation is inversely proportional to the organizational coefficient of friction (see Norm: … the epoxy that greases the wheels of progress). Law 10: Government has a high tolerance for failure … as long as it does not happen. Law 11: Export control and ITAR policies ensure that the Pentagon will get yesterday’s technologies tomorrow. Law 12: Feed your innovators (employees and smaller suppliers) … or they will starve and/or go to another table. (i.e. impact of 120-day accounts payable) Law 13: Innovation cannot survive without top cover; allow failures early and often, but when still relatively cheap. Law 14: If the profits of labor are greater than the profits of innovation, a company almost certainly will fail. Law 15: Innovation is inversely proportional to the weight of the procurement specifications. Law 16: The farther away from the government you get, the more money you can make. Law 17: The only time an engineer is optimistic is when establishing a schedule for completion. Law 18: Creating and disciplining well-‐defined interface standards in defense and security would expand competition. Example: telephone integration standards allowed many players to participate in telecom. Open standards today are really proprietary standards that provide a long-‐term annuity to the owner.
4 SPONSORED BY
Law 19: Co-‐opetition will rule. The G7 must bring China and other emerging economies into the global commercial “rule system” as soon as possible. The sooner this happens, the more responsible China/they will be in the global community of modern industrialized nations. OR, stated another way: Pirates eventually die of rum or become shipping companies – make emerging economies shipping companies early. Law 20: Lead, Follow or …. Regardless of the industry sector, winners will be those aligned in the shaded blue area (see diagram below).
More Laws to Consider While the Summit attendees were focused on developing 20 new laws to complement Norm Augustine’s original list, there were additional thoughts worthy of consideration. The brilliance of an outside idea introduced into a design team against its will dulls in direct proportion to the brilliance of the design team.
5 SPONSORED BY
The cost of a system is inversely proportional to the level of trust between government, primes, and supply base. Innovation – takes a village, where big players don’t starve the villagers in the process and bring them to the design/build process early. The age of technology in a fielded system is proportional to the program’s development funding. The more money you have, the older the tech will be when it goes to market. There are two theories of disagreeing with your customer. Both of them are wrong. The quantity and quality of innovation is directly proportional to the magnitude of the M factor (M= motivation). If you build a better mousetrap, the government won’t beat a path to your door. Feed your innovators or they will starve – or go to another table. Successful innovation depends on more than just technology; it requires a paying customer willing to embrace the change. To pursue high-‐risk innovation you need an exit strategy, particularly if you are a large company. What is considered to be business innovation frequently is no more than a shift of work from one functional area to another. The primary focus used to be how much money can I make. Now it is how much risk can I take. The corollary to this is you shouldn’t necessarily expect customer-‐funded development in this environment. Remember the movie, “A Bridge Too Far” – don’t outrun your infrastructure, including suppliers. For the first time since WWII, affordability is a higher priority than performance gains. Defense companies need commercial-‐like headlights in technology, time.
6 SPONSORED BY
To drive innovation in outcomes, we must better align stakeholder interest/incentives to create two-‐way transparency, build trust and shorten time required to deliver products to market. In the government-‐contracting world, law/regulation mitigates trust. We need a third party to play a role in fixing this shortcoming. Don’t expect innovation when you provide the spec. Aerospace and defense needs to link technology roadmaps with product introduction cycles. The current gap between the two is the “chasm of death”. Developing the link provides the means to sustain/grow over time. Failure to understand the portfolio of innovation in your enterprise is a great peril. All innovation has different time frames, risk levels and resource requirements – if all is high, then you can’t get too much product. Culture trumps technology. Too much computing results in too little thinking – thinking through the physics, science, environment of the problem is required. Electronic communication and 3D models are poor substitutes for face-‐to-‐face communication. We design by mission, not testing, alleviating us of pesky problems —and opportunities to eliminate them early. Partnerships are anything but partners. Shared destiny too often becomes destruction. Time for governance outstrips industry capability. Success is proportional to innovation; innovation is a power function of ability to attract new talent. If you don’t keep the battery charged, it will be dead when you need it. If you don’t know where you’re going, all roads look good. Game changers don’t know the meaning of “good enough.”
7 SPONSORED BY
Innovation is a team sport. The path to collaborative innovation is strewn with barbed wire; the path to success comes to those who can find a new or alternate path. Funhouse mirrors are the business equivalent of perceived risk. The degree of integration is directly proportional to reward potential or equal to the expected value/expected cost. A government spec-‐driven process does not create a Watson (see IBM/Jeopardy). Long-‐term sustainment of a program doesn’t sustain the industrial base. If policies attack failure, failure is assured. The state of the U.S. military industrial base is directly proportional to the margin allowed and proportional to Augustine’s 16th law. If the profits of labor are greater than the profits of innovation, the industry will fail. The best innovations are those that a million people said wouldn’t work. The first step to a solution is acknowledging the problem. The greatest innovations come with the least knowledge of how they should be accomplished. We are not constrained by what should be. If the government can ignore commercial business models, it will. If the government can dis-‐incentivize innovation through its IP policy it will. The government has a high tolerance for failure, as long as it doesn’t happen. The OEMS are delegating design authority to suppliers, unless they don’t build what the OEM specified. Buying In is now a future, not a one-‐time event. Innovation is inversely proportional to the depth of the procurement spec.
8 SPONSORED BY
NOTES FROM DISCUSSION Several of the small groups created charts and note lists relative to how/why they proposed specific laws. Elements of a Business Model
Today Should Be Customer-‐value proposition
Minimize unit production cost
Life-‐cycle cost
Profit model Constrained, regulated Open-‐value-‐driven Innovation Customer funded
(technology Supplier-‐funded (cost control)
Resources Diminishing Drawn to more dynamic, challenging industries
Drawn to new, exciting opportunities
Business Culture Risk-‐averse, focused on H1
Need to promote risk-‐taking Freedom to fail
Business Process Detailed, processes and procedures Restrictive
Priorities for industrial innovation:
Technology . Expand the frontier . Weight reduction . Propulsion technology
Necessity–driven . 3D printing . Rapid prototyping
Business model innovation . Sources of value . Delivery mechanisms Enablers of innovation required for the future
o Processes to identify disruptive technologies. o An industry and organizational culture willing to embrace and learn
from failure. o Employees and cultures who are curious and who learn continuously.
9 SPONSORED BY
o Processes designed to capture unmet customer needs. o Rewards and recognition that work and meet human needs.
Impediments to innovation: • Current acquisition system – lack of commitment to justify risk/reward; • Profitability constraints impede corporate willingness to invest; • Functional “this is how we have always done it” attitudes; • Inability to value the outcome over the specification; • A generation that is gaining limited experience moving from “innovate”
to “make”; • Cultures where innovators are often punished – those shot from behind
as others move forward; • Leadership development programs that “stamp out” new leaders vs.
encouraging natural leaders. The faster you exert downward margin pressure on suppliers, the more difficult it is for their business to succeed. The higher the number of projects on your innovation horizon, the greater the resistance your shareholders will exert. Organizational constructs are required to support. Stop waiting for the customer to tell you what it wants. Stop relying on the government for investment capital. Focused competency trumps diversification. The farther away from the government you get, the more money you can make. The best law for the perfect business model is yet to be developed – keep working. Innovation without impact … isn’t. The supplier of the future is an innovation source and partner to his customer. Innovation doesn’t happen in a vacuum. It is incentivized by the prospect of business success. The seeds of innovation are inversely proportional to the organizational coefficient of friction. (Internal layers of processes, resistance, etc.) (Epoxy of progress)
10 SPONSORED BY
Create ambassadors across the A&D of how unique this industry is. Investment is required to drive sales growth; investment is also required to survive declining sales.
Employees want direction and strategy – what am I going to be, where am I headed and how do I get there? Young people have gadgets in their hands every day, and every day something is happening in A&D companies that can be delivered via these devices to create excitement. We need an agnostic aerospace branding fund. Every employee needs the ability to shape the future. Continuously deliver direct, specific and useful feedback – early and often. If you want the best people, be the best leader. Always do the right things, whether someone is watching or not. Retention of ‘A’ players is a function of the quality of leadership – matrix organizations make this a real challenge – who is my boss? Engagement of 95% who want to do good work is a function of dealing with the bottom 5% -‐-‐ the 95% know long before the leader knows who the 5% is. Sometimes the 5% are just in the wrong job.
-‐-‐ Growth +
You are here
11 SPONSORED BY
Don’t forget the top 5% -‐-‐ they have options. Surround yourself with people who are smarter than you are. Feedback does not have to be unpleasant; it does have to be real. Feedback is a function of respect. People need to know the notional path to success in this organization. People want to be valued – and this does not necessarily mean a huge paycheck. Observe the Platinum Rule – people want to be treated as they want to be treated – not necessarily how you want to be treated. Leaders need to engage people with ambition in the probability discussion – what they desire versus what is possible/likely. Your expectation of your employees is a self-‐fulfilling prophecy. A strategy-‐driven culture is the DNA of a high-‐performance organization. You probably have a leadership problem when employees vote with their feet. The ability to attract and retain high-‐quality workforce is directly proportional to the quality of an organization’s leadership. A little recognition goes a long way. Job function without accountability is human capital squandered.
About Siemens PLM Software Siemens PLM Software, a business unit of the Siemens Industry Automation Division, is a leading global provider of product lifecycle management (PLM) software and services with seven million licensed seats and more than 71,000 customers worldwide. Headquartered in Plano, Texas, Siemens PLM Software works collaboratively with companies to deliver open solutions that help them turn more ideas into successful products. For more information on Siemens PLM Software products and services, visit www.siemens.com/plm <http://www.siemens.com/plm> .