38
Excellence in Risk Management II A Qualitative Survey of Enterprise Risk Management Programs April 18, 2005

Excellence in Risk Management II A Qualitative Survey of Enterprise Risk Management Programs April 18, 2005

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Excellence in Risk Management II A Qualitative Survey of Enterprise Risk Management Programs April 18, 2005

Excellence in Risk Management IIA Qualitative Survey of Enterprise Risk Management Programs

April 18, 2005

Page 2: Excellence in Risk Management II A Qualitative Survey of Enterprise Risk Management Programs April 18, 2005

Marsh 2

What Is ERM?

“Assessing and addressing risk from all sources.”

“A process to manage all risks of the enterprise.”

“Managing your business with a more deliberate and systematic focus on risk.”

“Implementing the infrastructure and culture within the organization to make good decisions on risk.”

Respondents shared these definitions with us:

Page 3: Excellence in Risk Management II A Qualitative Survey of Enterprise Risk Management Programs April 18, 2005

Marsh 3

“Excellence in Risk Management” Studies

“Excellence in Risk Management I” studied the risk management practices of 30 top-performing risk managers in North America. Findings presented at the 2004 RIMS conference included the following:

– The events of the past 10 years have resulted in a dramatic shift in the the importance of risk management and its practices.

– There is an opportunity for risk managers to play a more strategic role in their organizations.

– Companies can recognize a significant financial impact by controlling risk and recognizing profit from risk-related strategies.

– Successful risk management relies on a robust hierarchy of information and integrated information systems.

Using “Excellence I” as a foundation of understanding, “Excellence II” examines the characteristics and practices of organizations that are implementing an enterprise-wide risk management program.

Page 4: Excellence in Risk Management II A Qualitative Survey of Enterprise Risk Management Programs April 18, 2005

Marsh 4

Excellence in Risk Management II—Research Parameters and Methodology

Methodology:

Qualitative versus quantitative approach

In-depth interviews within five large organizations that are implementing an ERM program

Industries represented: Information services (2) Financial services (2) Commodity services (1)

Interviews with 25 individuals at these organizations, including risk management at each company

Interviews were administered by phone to obtain insights on practices, perceptions, organizational dynamics, and relationships

Interviews were supplemented by a short closed-end questionnaire covering basic topics

Interviews were conducted by Greenwich Associates

Page 5: Excellence in Risk Management II A Qualitative Survey of Enterprise Risk Management Programs April 18, 2005

Marsh 5

Who We Interviewed

Risk Management (7)

Operations (8)

Audit (5)

Compliance and Legal (3)

Business-Unit Head (1)

Safety (1)

Page 6: Excellence in Risk Management II A Qualitative Survey of Enterprise Risk Management Programs April 18, 2005

Marsh 6

Key Takeaways

Recognize the fundamental benefits of ERM

Understand how to implement ERM

Understand how to sustain ERM in your company

Page 7: Excellence in Risk Management II A Qualitative Survey of Enterprise Risk Management Programs April 18, 2005

Marsh 7

Enterprise Risk Management—Applying Risk Management Discipline More Broadly

ObjectiveSetting

RiskIdentification

Risk Assessment

Risk MitigationControl

Activities

Monitoring

•All Types of Risk•Broad Focus•Continuous

Communication

Source: The Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission

Page 8: Excellence in Risk Management II A Qualitative Survey of Enterprise Risk Management Programs April 18, 2005

Marsh 8

Survey Results Overview

Why ERM?

Getting Senior-Management Support

Creating a Process to Support ERM

Building ERM Into the Corporate Culture

Key Takeaways

Page 9: Excellence in Risk Management II A Qualitative Survey of Enterprise Risk Management Programs April 18, 2005

Why ERM?

Page 10: Excellence in Risk Management II A Qualitative Survey of Enterprise Risk Management Programs April 18, 2005

Marsh 10

ERM Benefits

“I’m liberating people in our company about risk and uncertainty so that they can better achieve the objectives that they made to the board.”

-Risk Manager

Page 11: Excellence in Risk Management II A Qualitative Survey of Enterprise Risk Management Programs April 18, 2005

Marsh 11

As Organizations Adopt ERM, the Role of Risk Manager Becomes More Strategic

Strategic Risk Management

Progressive Risk Management

Traditional Risk Management

Impact On Impact On Organization’s Bottom Organization’s Bottom Line and CultureLine and Culture

Organizational Buy-InOrganizational Buy-In

Technical Technical ManagementManagement

Page 12: Excellence in Risk Management II A Qualitative Survey of Enterprise Risk Management Programs April 18, 2005

Marsh 12

As Companies Develop an ERM Approach, Potential Benefits Multiply

. Support Objectives. Support Objectives

. Improve Earnings . Improve Earnings and Cash Flowand Cash Flow. Manage Growth. Manage Growth. Capture . Capture OpportunitiesOpportunities

. Reduce Losses

. Lower Insurance Costs

Managing Risk

Transferring Risk

OptimizingRisk

Advanced Risk Management

Defensive Risk Management

ERM Approach

. Purchase Insurance and Cover Risks

Page 13: Excellence in Risk Management II A Qualitative Survey of Enterprise Risk Management Programs April 18, 2005

Marsh 13

73%

80%

80%

80%

Risk Manager

Other

Agree/Strongly Agree

The Role of Risk Management in the Firm

The firm views risk management as a keystrategic function

The role of the risk manager has becomemuch more strategicwith implementationof ERM

Risk Manager

Other

(Risk Manager: n=5; Other: n=15)

Page 14: Excellence in Risk Management II A Qualitative Survey of Enterprise Risk Management Programs April 18, 2005

Marsh 14

31%

81%

20%

100%

60%

88%

75%

80%Strategic

Operational

Highly Significant Benefits (4 & 5)

Financial

Hazard

Q21. With the implementation of an integrated approach to risk management across the firm in all of the risk areas (ERM), how would you rate the benefits accruing—or expected to accrue—in each of the major types of risk? Please rate on a scale of 1 to 5, where 1 is “None” and 5 is “Highly Significant.”

Benefits of ERM Implementation inMajor Risk Areas

Risk Manager

Other

Risk Manager

Other

Risk Manager

Other

Risk Manager

Other

(Risk Manager: n=5; Other: n=16)

Page 15: Excellence in Risk Management II A Qualitative Survey of Enterprise Risk Management Programs April 18, 2005

Marsh 15

40%

80%

80%

100%

.

Risk Manager

Other

Present and Future Benefits of ERM

Agree/Strongly Agree

There are tremendousfuture potential benefits in ERM that have not yet been realized

The firm is recognizing substantial benefits from ERM today

Risk Manager

Other

(Risk Manager: n=5; Other: n=15)

Page 16: Excellence in Risk Management II A Qualitative Survey of Enterprise Risk Management Programs April 18, 2005

Marsh 16

94%

88%

80%

100%

100%

94%

100%

100%

Highly Significant Benefits (4 & 5)

Risk Manager

Other

Risk Manager

Other

Risk Manager

Other

Risk Manager

Other

Improved communications on risk taking to shareholders/board

Better-informed decisions

Better allocation of capital and resources to address risk

Improved corporate governance practices

(Risk Manager: n=5; Other: n=16)

Perceived Benefits of ERM

Page 17: Excellence in Risk Management II A Qualitative Survey of Enterprise Risk Management Programs April 18, 2005

Marsh 17

Examples of ERM Benefits

Multimillion-dollar project undertaken once risk profile understood

Offshore outsourcing program cancelled once high risk was assessed

Natural hedge discovered

Facilitated M&A process

Reduced insurance rates

Decided not to discontinue product once risk was understood

Page 18: Excellence in Risk Management II A Qualitative Survey of Enterprise Risk Management Programs April 18, 2005

Marsh 18

ERM—Driving Forces

Company Risk Company Risk Management Management

FocusFocus

Understanding RiskUnderstanding Risk

Controlling RiskControlling Risk

Optimizing RiskOptimizing Risk

External Forces Sarbanes-Oxley

Six Sigma Corporate Scandals Regulatory Initiatives September 11 Natural Disasters

Internal Forces

Managing Earnings and Cash Flows Stakeholder Accountability Meeting Objectives Regulatory Compliance

Page 19: Excellence in Risk Management II A Qualitative Survey of Enterprise Risk Management Programs April 18, 2005

Getting Senior-Management Support

Page 20: Excellence in Risk Management II A Qualitative Survey of Enterprise Risk Management Programs April 18, 2005

Marsh 20

Consensus That Board and Senior-Management Buy-In of ERM Is Essential to Acceptance by the Organization

Board

Senior Management

Functional Management

Business Units and Operations

• Alignment with board objectives

• Senior-level champion

• Continued involvement

• Sets the tone

• Link to investors

Page 21: Excellence in Risk Management II A Qualitative Survey of Enterprise Risk Management Programs April 18, 2005

Marsh 21

Continued Support From Senior Management Requires Direct Communication By ERM Team

• Risk committees

• Senior-management risk committee

• Board level: audit committee / separate risk committee

• Internal audit

• Continuous communications

• “Don’t shoot the messenger” attitude

• Help from brokers and consultants

• Can jump-start process

Page 22: Excellence in Risk Management II A Qualitative Survey of Enterprise Risk Management Programs April 18, 2005

Creating a Process to Support ERM

Page 23: Excellence in Risk Management II A Qualitative Survey of Enterprise Risk Management Programs April 18, 2005

Marsh 23

Accountability and Reporting at All Levels Is Required to Support the ERM Process

Board

Senior Management

CEO CFO CRO COO CTO

OperationsBusiness Units

FunctionalManagement

Cross-Functional ERM TeamRisk Management, Audit, Compliance/Legal

Risk Committee

Risk Committee

Page 24: Excellence in Risk Management II A Qualitative Survey of Enterprise Risk Management Programs April 18, 2005

Marsh 24

Organization to Support ERM—Key Takeaways

• Separate risk committees to board and senior management

• Risk management representation in senior management

• Cross-functional ERM team—risk management, internal audit, legal, and compliance form core team

• Representation from operations/business units and functional management

• Human resources conspicuous in its absence

Page 25: Excellence in Risk Management II A Qualitative Survey of Enterprise Risk Management Programs April 18, 2005

Marsh 25

Objectives

Policies and Procedures

Decisions

Plans and Budgets

Financial Strategy

Enterprise Risk Management

Corporate Strategy

Link to Strategic Objectives and Integrate ERM Thinking Into Regular Business Activities

Page 26: Excellence in Risk Management II A Qualitative Survey of Enterprise Risk Management Programs April 18, 2005

Marsh 26

Reinforce the ERM Process With a CommonLanguage and Training

• Establish a common language about risk

• Simple

• In conformity with culture

• Take a consultative approach to training by using workshops

• Use available technology

• Keep it simple

Page 27: Excellence in Risk Management II A Qualitative Survey of Enterprise Risk Management Programs April 18, 2005

Building ERM Into the Corporate Culture

Page 28: Excellence in Risk Management II A Qualitative Survey of Enterprise Risk Management Programs April 18, 2005

Marsh 28

“Risk management is everybody’s job. Everybody who does anything in the company is a risk manager to some extent.”

-Senior Manager

ERM in the Corporate Culture

“The most important thing is to get buy-in from the most senior levels of the organization first. Until you do that, you’re going to have great ideas, but they’ll never see the light of day.”

-Risk Manager

Page 29: Excellence in Risk Management II A Qualitative Survey of Enterprise Risk Management Programs April 18, 2005

Marsh 29

93%

100%Risk Manager

Other

Agree/Strongly Agree

Embedding ERM in Corporate Culture

Implementation of ERM requires and results in a cultural change in the organization

(Risk Manager: n=5; Other: n=15)

Page 30: Excellence in Risk Management II A Qualitative Survey of Enterprise Risk Management Programs April 18, 2005

Marsh 30

How to Influence Thinking to Include ERM

Communications

Compensation

Performance Measurement

Learning & Development

“Grooming”Internally

All Company

Employees

“Lifetime” Mentality to ERM

Page 31: Excellence in Risk Management II A Qualitative Survey of Enterprise Risk Management Programs April 18, 2005

Key Takeaways

Page 32: Excellence in Risk Management II A Qualitative Survey of Enterprise Risk Management Programs April 18, 2005

Marsh 32

ERM Risk Analysis Involves Five Fundamental Steps—Applied to All Areas of Risk

1. IdentifyRisks

2. AssessImpact

3. AssessLikelihood

4. Quantify &

Prioritize

5. Optimize

Page 33: Excellence in Risk Management II A Qualitative Survey of Enterprise Risk Management Programs April 18, 2005

Marsh 33

ERM Demands a Strategic Role for Risk Managers

ERM ApproachERM Approach

Advanced RiskAdvanced RiskManagementManagement

Defensive Risk Defensive Risk ManagementManagement

Strategic Risk Management

Progressive Risk Management

Traditional Risk Management

Compa

ny E

RM E

volu

tionRisk M

anager Evolution

VALUE

Page 34: Excellence in Risk Management II A Qualitative Survey of Enterprise Risk Management Programs April 18, 2005

Marsh 34

For Low-Frequency Risks, ERM Can RevealHidden Risks Requiring Action and Help in Prioritizing Resources

High ImpactHigh Impact Low Likelihood

Low Impact Low Likelihood

High Impact High Likelihood

Low Impact High Likelihood Low Impact

Low Likelihood High Likelihood

Page 35: Excellence in Risk Management II A Qualitative Survey of Enterprise Risk Management Programs April 18, 2005

Marsh 35

Cautions

• Don’t treat ERM as one-time project

• Overkill can create backlash

• Need tangible accomplishments to keep momentum

Page 36: Excellence in Risk Management II A Qualitative Survey of Enterprise Risk Management Programs April 18, 2005

Marsh 36

Recommendations

“Just do it! ”

Get started

Identify a champion

Get senior-management buy-in

Start prioritizing risks using “Top10” approach

Perform business practice reviews

Hold risk workshops

Leverage existing initiatives– Sarbanes-Oxley– Six Sigma– Audit and compliance initiatives– Strategic planning

Maintain sensitivity to seismic events in the company

Employ team approach to the task of implementing ERM

Formalize it: – Structured approach to

organizing processes / lines of reporting

Keep ERM technology simple and understandable

Embed ERM in existing business processes

Treat ERM as a process, not a project

Page 37: Excellence in Risk Management II A Qualitative Survey of Enterprise Risk Management Programs April 18, 2005

Marsh 37

Final Thought

“The key to high-performance risk management is aligning risk strategy among key risk stakeholders, obtaining and sustaining senior management engagement, and achieving effective integration with strategic planning.”

-Risk Manager

Page 38: Excellence in Risk Management II A Qualitative Survey of Enterprise Risk Management Programs April 18, 2005

Thank You

RIMS and Marsh are proud to have sponsored the Excellence in Risk Management II survey

Marsh is part of the family of MMC companies, including Kroll, Guy Carpenter, Putnam Investments, Mercer Human Resource Consulting (including Mercer Health & Benefits, Mercer HR Services, Mercer Investment Consulting, and Mercer Global Investments), and Mercer specialty consulting businesses (including Mercer Management Consulting, Mercer Oliver Wyman, Mercer Delta Organizational Consulting, NERA Economic Consulting, and Lippincott Mercer).

The Risk and Insurance Management Society, Inc. (RIMS) is a not-for-profit organization dedicated to advancing the practice of risk management, a professional discipline that protects physical, financial and human resources. Founded in 1950, RIMS represents nearly 4,000 industrial, service, nonprofit, charitable, and governmental entities. The Society serves over 9,600 risk management professionals around theworld.

Copyright 2005 Marsh Inc. All rights reserved. Compliance # MA6-10480