Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
The
Middle States Association of Colleges and Schools
Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
EXCELLENCE BY DESIGN
A Self-Study for Accreditation
by the Middle States Association
ST. JOSEPH SCHOOL
DOWNINGTOWN, PA
April 26 – 29, 2015
SR. CATHERINE MASINO
PRINCIPAL
CATHY HERB
BERNADETTE LOUDEN
INTERNAL COORDINATORS
3624 Market Street 2 West Philadelphia, PA 19104
Telephone: (267) 284-5000 FAX: (215) 662-0957
www.msa-cess.org
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
Introduction 1
Organization for Growth and Improvement
Introduction 3
The Internal Coordinators 4
The School's Planning Team 5
The Role of the School's Leadership and Governance 9
The Plan for Institutionalizing a Planning Ethic 10
The Plan for Communication and Awareness 13
The Plan for Periodic Reviews of the Plan for Growth
and Improvement 14
Profile of the School
Profile of the School Community 16
Profile of Student Performance 31
The School's Mission, Beliefs, and Profile of Graduates
Mission 37
Beliefs 38
Profile of Graduates 40
Profile of Organizational Capacity
Introduction 43
Philosophy/Mission Standard 45
Governance and Leadership Standard 51
School Improvement Planning Standard 60
Finances Standard 67
Facilities Standard 75
School Climate and Organization Standard 86
Page
Health and Safety Standard 97
Educational Program Standard 107
Assessment and Evidence of Student Learning Standard 117
Student Services Standard 124
Student Life and Student Activities Standard 134
Information Resources and Technology Standard 142
Self-Assessment of Adherence to the Indicators of Quality for
Curriculum, Instruction and Assessment
Introduction 151
Religion 152
ELA – Writing 169
Science 186
The Plan for Growth and Improvement
STUDENT PERFORMANCE AND ORGANIZATIONAL
CAPACITY OBJECTIVES 205
Student Performance Objective: Religion 206
Student Performance Objective: ELA – Writing 206
Student Performance Objective: Science 207
Organizational Capacity Objective: Professional Development 207
Technical Review 208
Action Plans:
Action Plan: Religion 221
Action Plan: ELA – Writing 226
Action Plan: Science 229
Action Plan: Professional Development 235
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 1
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
INTRODUCTION
xcellence by Design is an accreditation protocol that uses strategic planning as a
vehicle for growth and improvement in student performance and in the school’s
capacity to effect that growth. The protocol, developed by the Middle States
Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools (MSA-CESS) of the Middle States
Association of Colleges and Schools, links various planning and school growth and
improvement efforts. Excellence by Design leads the school to establish objectives for
improving student performance and organizational capacity based on its vision of a
preferred future for its students. Therefore, Excellence by Design is a future-oriented and
visionary process. In addition, the protocol provides for a continuous review of
programs and services and of the results of student performance. It also allows diverse
constituent groups to participate in charting the future of the institution.
The purpose of Excellence by Design is to provide a framework and process to guide the
school’s efforts to achieve excellence in student performance and to achieve
accreditation by the Middle States Association of Colleges and Schools—The Gold
Standard.
Excellence by Design also provides the framework for formally aligning all the work of
the school to ensure that all of its efforts are coordinated and focused on achieving the
school’s mission. It is expected that this framework will accomplish the following
purposes:
Development of a sense of community and common purpose among the school’s
students and staff, and its community of stakeholders.
A Plan for Growth and Improvement in student performance and the school’s
capacity to produce the levels of student performance expected by the school and
its community of stakeholders.
Greater cooperation between all of the school’s stakeholders in identifying and
implementing practices that have been demonstrated to lead to excellence in
student performance and the organization’s capacity to produce the desired
levels of student performance.
Most importantly, this framework intends to develop in the school community of
stakeholders an understanding that the school is part of a larger community of learners
and that this community has agreed upon, supports, and accepts responsibility for
assisting the school in achieving its Mission, Profile of Graduates, and Plan for Growth
E
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 2
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
and Improvement in student performance and organizational capacity. This learning
community understands that, by working together to articulate and align its efforts, it
can achieve higher levels of excellence in student performance.
In order to develop a culture of continuous growth and improvement, education
leaders must keep the attention of the entire school community focused on answering
the five questions below. In the Excellence by Design process, the Planning Team was
guided to develop answers to the following questions:
#1: By the time they have experienced our full educational program and services,
what should our students know, and how should they be able to use what
they know? What content, skills, and work habits should be the priorities for
learning? What attitudes, qualities or characteristics should our students
demonstrate?
#2: How well should students perform the desired outcomes, and what does
excellent performance look like?
#3: How will we measure and evaluate our students’ performance in multiple
ways?
#4: How well do our students currently perform? What is the actual quality of
their work?
#5: What must we do to improve student performance?
In setting a course for continuous improvement in student and organizational
performance, schools and their communities must study not only what the existing data
tell them about their students’ present performance, but they must also set clear targets
for what they want student performance to be in the future. Maintaining a focus on
these five questions is essential to a successful continuous improvement process and is a
“habit of mind” that must be cultivated and nurtured by the school’s leaders and those
leading the growth and improvement efforts. Too often schools find themselves
working on curriculum and instructional materials and engaging in professional
development before they have clearly decided what their students should know, how
they should use their content knowledge, process skills, and work habits, and what the
quality of their performance should be.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 3
Self-Study Document
© 2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
ORGANIZATION FOR GROWTH AND
IMPROVEMENT
n this section of the school's self-study, the school is asked to ensure it has the
organizational elements and processes that are necessary for the school to be
successful in achieving its Plan for Growth and Improvement. The school has or has
developed the organizational elements and processes described below:
Leadership for Growth and Improvement
The primary role of the leadership and governing body of the school—those in
positions of authority and influence within the school—in the school improvement
process is to serve as the “champions” for developing a planning ethic and the growth
and improvement process. Strategic planning experts have long held that champions
are extremely important to the success of planning for growth and improvement in any
organization. Because a major goal of the self-study and accreditation process is to
ensure that the school has a vision and a plan to achieve the vision that is accepted and
supported by all, leaders must communicate publicly, clearly, and often that:
the planning process is important for the future of the school and its students,
and
they will provide the leadership, resources, and support needed to make the
process and the plan successful.
This critical role for leaders also applies to the heads and governing bodies of larger
organizations of which the school may be a part. It is very difficult for an individual
school within a larger system to plan strategically for improving student performance
without the clear support and assistance of it parent organization. They, too, must
“champion the cause.”
It is also important for the head of the school and at least one representative of the
governing body to serve, when appropriate, on the Planning Team. However, in this
role, the leaders should serve as “equals among equals” by serving on the Team as
members with the same authority and influence as all other members of the Team. This
is often a difficult role to take, because education organizations are typically organized
as hierarchies, and the leaders are often expected to make the decisions in a “top down”
I
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 4
Self-Study Document
© 2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
manner. However, if the goal is to identify a mission and plan to achieve it that is
“owned” by all the stakeholders of the school, the mission and plan must be developed
through a grass roots level—bottom up, rather than top down.
A. Internal Coordinators
A required component of the protocol is the appointment of a team of Internal
Coordinators. The primary functions of the Internal Coordinators are to:
Coordinate the institution’s planning process and development of a plan for
growth in student performance.
Oversee planning and preparation for the Visiting Team visit.
Prepare for the Mid-Term Report.
Provide the energy, enthusiasm, and expertise to move the process forward.
The Internal Coordinators for the self-study and accreditation process are:
Name Role in the Institution
Bernadette Louden 8th grade teacher
Cathy Herb 2nd grade teacher
A.1 How and why were the Internal Coordinators selected?
During our opening faculty meetings (school year 2013-2014), Dr. Angela Rufo
presented the Excellence by Design Protocol. The descriptions of the Internal
Coordinators and Planning Team were then distributed at our October faculty meeting
and all faculty members were asked to reflect on their willingness and ability to serve in
a leadership role. The administration, Sister Catherine Irene and Sister Rita Doyle,
discussed possible candidates and approached Mrs. Bernadette Louden and Mrs. Leann
Robertson to be our Internal Coordinators. They agreed, however, when Mrs.
Robertson left our school for a career change, Mrs. Catherine Herb assumed co-
leadership as an Internal Coordinator.
A.2 How did the Internal Coordinators fulfill their role and responsibilities?
The Internal Coordinators were very committed to their roles and responsibilities. They
collaborated with the Planning Team, chairpersons and committee members so that all
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 5
Self-Study Document
© 2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
parties understood the process. They assured that communication was and remains
ongoing.
A.3 What kinds of support and assistance were provided to the Internal
Coordinators to enable them to fulfill their responsibilities?
Mrs. Bernadette Louden met with the Internal Coordinators from SS. Philip and James
School and developed a timetable for meetings. She shared this with Mrs. Cathy Herb
and then with the Planning Team. Whenever questions arose or additional information
was needed, the Administration assisted by communicating with other schools and
securing the required resources. Dr. Angela Rufo provided timely assistance and
direction as questions arose.
B. The Planning Team1
A major commitment the school makes when seeking accreditation is to include a
varied spectrum of the school's stakeholders in the process of continually defining a
preferred vision, in developing the means to get closer to that vision, and in
implementing the action plans developed by these stakeholders. In summary, it is
expected that the Planning Team will be given the authority, resources, and support to:
Develop the vision for the school by creating or reaffirming a statement of
mission.
Develop a set of beliefs to serve as the ethical code for the institution.
Develop a profile of the knowledge, skills, and qualities the institution expects of
its graduates.
1It is important to note that, although the Excellence by Design protocol calls this stakeholder group a
Planning Team, what the school calls this group is not important. Its purpose, composition, operation,
and results are what is key. What the protocol requires for accreditation is that this group meets the letter
and spirit of the requirements for a Planning Team without regard to what it is called. In many schools,
an improvement team already exists and includes the required stakeholders, so it makes sense for the
school to continue that organization with any adjustments necessary to meet the requirements of the
ExBD protocol. This same principle applies to all requirements of the protocol. It is less important what
elements and products of the process are called than it is that the school meets the intentions and results
of the requirements.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 6
Self-Study Document
© 2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
Identify the areas of student performance that are the priorities for growth and
improvement.
Oversee development of the action plans to achieve the performance objectives.
Monitor implementation of the action plans.
Conduct a periodic review of the progress being made to achieving the
objectives.
The protocol requires that the Planning Team includes a varied spectrum of the school's
community of stakeholders. Because Middle States’ member institutions are so varied in
type and situation, Middle States does not prescribe what groups constitute a school's
stakeholders. This is a local decision. However, the school's leadership and the Planning
Team will be expected to provide a rationale for the composition of the Planning Team.
Because the school is committing itself to developing a planning ethic and a culture of
continuous improvement, the Planning Team should be institutionalized. The
institution must find ways to integrate the work of the Planning Team into the culture
of the school and the work of the school. In most cases, this will require a concerted
effort and the opening to examination of how the institution thinks about institutional
growth and improvement and who is responsible to lead it.
B.1 The members of the Planning Team are:
Name Role in the Institution
Sister Catherine Masino Principal
Sister Rita Doyle Vice-Principal (2013-2014)
Bernadette Louden 8th grade teacher
Cathy Herb 2nd grade teacher
Karen McDonald 6th grade teacher
Kathy Mullen 5th grade teacher (until March 2015)*
Sr. Christine Lamb 5th grade teacher
Mrs. Lorraine Geiling Art teacher
Sister Diane Licordare Vice-Principal (2014-2015)
*Kathy Mullen resigned from St. Joseph School, effective March 13, 2015.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 7
Self-Study Document
© 2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
B.2 What charge was given to the Planning Team? What authority was it given to
oversee, monitor, and make decisions regarding the school’s planning for
growth and improvement in student performance and organizational
capacity?
The Planning Team was given the charge to revise the Mission Statement and the Belief
Statements. They were also charged with defining the Profile of Graduates of St. Joseph
School. The Planning Team will be given the directive to oversee and monitor the
School’s plans for growth and improvement and engage stakeholders in the process.
They will present ideas to the administration that require decisions and discuss all areas
to work for consensus before presenting them to the entire faculty, staff, and school
community.
B.3 How does the membership of the Team reflect the diversity within the
school’s community of stakeholders?
The Planning Team reflects the diversity of the school community. Teachers were
selected across each grade level (primary grades, middle grades, and junior high) and
special content areas. Some members of the Planning Team are current and former
parents of students of St. Joseph School. The Principal and Vice-Principal are also
members of the Planning Team.
B.4 How were the members of the Planning Team selected?
In addition to soliciting the two Internal Coordinators, the School administration
invited all faculty members to volunteer their time and expertise. Each faculty member
was provided a list of the Standards and asked to select a few areas in which they felt
comfortable serving. They were also given the description of the Planning Team and
the qualities needed to serve on this Team. The Planning Team consists of those who
volunteered to serve in this area.
B.5 How does the Planning Team function and make its decisions?
The Planning Team followed a consensus model for decision making. All topics were
thoroughly discussed and vetted prior to making a decision.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 8
Self-Study Document
© 2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
B.6 How often did the Planning Team meet? (Provide a list of the Team’s meetings
and minutes for the meetings in the Team’s workroom.)
The Planning Team has been meeting regularly since January 2014. The meetings were
typically held weekly as the Team worked to complete the Middle States Accreditation
process.
B.7 What is the Planning Team’s relationship to any other groups in the school, if
any, responsible for planning for growth and improvement in student
performance?
Members of the Planning Team are faculty members, administration and past and
present school parents. As a result, all have contributed ideas, goals and strategies for
growth and improvement.
B.8 What is the Planning Team’s plan for rotating membership of the Team and
identifying new members? What is the plan for training and orienting new
members to the work of the Team?
At the beginning of each school year, the Planning Team will be asked to recommit
themselves to their role. The committee chairpersons will provide the guidance
necessary for a smooth transition in the event that the team membership needs to be
modified.
B.9 How will the Planning Team function after the visit of the Visiting Team and
during the implementation of the Plan for Growth and Improvement?
The Planning Team will continue to function in a cohesive manner to maintain the
strategic plan and ensure ongoing success.
The Planning Team will:
o discuss the recommendations from the Visiting Team
o invite other stakeholders to join the implementation process
o communicate the plan for growth and improvement to stakeholders
o establish a time-line for implementation of recommendations made by the
Visiting Team
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 9
Self-Study Document
© 2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
C. Role of the School’s Leadership and Governance
It is school's formal leaders—those in positions of authority and influence within the
school—who should serve as the primary “champions” for the planning process and
the Plan for Growth and Improvement. Strategic planning experts have long held that
champions are extremely important to the success of planning. Because a goal of the
self-study and accreditation process is to develop a vision and a plan to achieve it that is
accepted and supported by the entire community of the school, the school's leaders and
governing body must communicate clearly and often that this process is important for
the future of the school and its students, and that they will provide the leadership,
resources, and support needed to make the process and the plan successful.
C.1. What role has the school’s leadership and governance played in the self-study
process and the planning for growth and improvement in student
performance?
The school‘s leadership has played a significant and supportive role in the self-study
process and the planning for growth and improvement in student performance.
The Principal and Vice-Principal have been integral members of the Planning
Team.
Each Planning Team member has been part of one of the curricular area
committees for growth and improvement.
The Pastor supports the School’s effort to obtain Middle States Accreditation
and has been advised of all proceedings. Additionally, one of the Internal
Coordinators met with the Pastor in June of 2014 to review the past year’s
proceedings and present the Team’s plans for the coming year.
C.2. How has the leadership provided support for the self-study and accreditation
processes?
Leadership has provided support for the self-study and accreditation process by
embracing the commitment of this goal.
School leadership promotes safe, open lines of communication which are
consistent with the Catholic nature of the school.
Pastor and Principal are advocates of the accreditation process and have
provided financial resources and time for implementation of the self-study and
accreditation process.
Faculty has provided significant leadership and has collaborated with the
Principal to revise the Mission Statement and Beliefs.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 10
Self-Study Document
© 2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
C.3. If the school is part of a larger system of schools, what role did the leadership
and governance of the system play in the planning process? What kind of support
did that leadership and governance provide for the school’s planning efforts?
The Office of Catholic Education of the Archdiocese of Philadelphia has
provided opportunities for leadership by offering in-service opportunities with a
representative from the Middle States Association.
Dr. Angela Rufo visited with the Principal and Internal Coordinator in April
2014 and with the Principal in November 2014 to provide support and answer
questions.
D. The Plan for Institutionalizing a Planning Ethic
A sound planning ethic is critical to achieving the school’s mission, its objectives for
growth and improvement in student performance and organizational capacity, and to
its capacity to effect the intended growth. An effective planning ethic addresses the
essential question: “Does the school and its community of stakeholders have the
capacity, the will, and the systematic structures and processes required to develop and
implement its plan and achieve its objectives?” A fine plan full of great activities is only
as strong as the ability and willingness of the school and its stakeholders to implement
it.
While successful planning is reflective of the school’s context and culture, it should be
visionary in describing what the school and its stakeholder community want for their
students and pragmatic in specifying the steps to reach that goal. Successful planning
for growth and improvement has been described as a delicate balance between brave
steps forward and reassuring steps to the side; between the recognition of the need for
growth and a celebration of what already exists that is good, steady, and/or certain;
between the bold, frequently scary, visions of future possibilities and the comfort with
past and present successes.
When a school seeks accreditation using the Excellence by Design protocol, it must
commit to working toward establishing and sustaining a planning ethic within the
school. A planning ethic means that planning for growth and improvement becomes
part of what the school and its community of stakeholders do as much as teaching, and
providing programs, resources, services, and activities. A planning ethic requires
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 11
Self-Study Document
© 2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
continuous clarification of the community’s unique mission, beliefs, profile of
graduates, and student and organizational performance goals. It requires that all of its
processes are vision-driven. And it requires that the community is action-oriented by
developing and implementing long-term, strategic action plans that integrate programs,
services, facilities, and support to address the school’s growth objectives.
In the Excellence by Design protocol, the school also makes a commitment to continuous
growth and improvement. The school and its stakeholders should demonstrate that
they are never satisfied with the status quo in terms of how their students perform but
are striving constantly to improve the levels of performance. The setting of and striving
to achieve challenging growth objectives should become a dynamic process in which
the school develops the flexibility to revise and modify its plans to achieve its objectives
based on the results received from implementing those plans. As part of the
accreditation process, the school must review the results of its efforts periodically and
open its processes and results willingly to review by its peers in the Middle States
Association.
A planning ethic also requires the school to commit to involving its stakeholders in
meaningful ways in the setting of objectives, developing plans to achieve and measure
those objectives, and the implementation of those plans. In a planning culture, the
school strives to develop broad ownership of both the planning process and the Plan for
Growth and Improvement by the entire community by ensuring broad based
knowledge and understanding of and support for the objectives and the plans to
achieve them.
A planning ethic that provides significant roles for the stakeholders of the school also
has the effect of sharing among the stakeholders responsibility for the success of any
planning for growth and improvement. Excellence by Design builds such roles and
responsibilities into the self-study and planning processes. Therefore, if implemented
faithfully, Excellence by Design can provide the school with the vehicle it needs to build
sustainability into its planning for growth and improvement, because ownership of and
responsibility for the success of the planning process and the plan for growth and
improvement no longer rest with one person (the head of the school) but with all of the
school’s stakeholders.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 12
Self-Study Document
© 2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
Describe below the school’s plan for institutionalizing a planning ethic.
The School’s planning ethic will come to fruition through several deliberate steps:
The Action Plan will be monitored through monthly Planning Team meetings to
review and assess progress. The team will use the teacher share folder to collect
and evaluate information regarding the growth and improvement of the school.
Survey Monkey will be used to collect data needed for measuring the
performance objectives as set by each committee.
A full evaluation of the progress made toward achieving the Plan’s goals,
revising the Plan and developing new goals as appropriate will be done on a
trimester basis. This evaluation will ensure that the assessments designated for
measuring the performance objectives are administered and that the results are
collected, analyzed, and used to determine the efficacy of the Action Plan. The
faculty as a whole will be involved through regular updates and discussions
during faculty meetings that would focus on the Plan. Content for those
meetings will be provided to Principal and Planning Team by the committee
members in order to prepare for these discussions.
A celebration of the school’s successes in moving toward achievement of its
objectives will be planned. These events will signify and celebrate the school’s
improvement and motivation in achieving its goals.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 13
Self-Study Document
© 2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
E. A Plan for Communication and Awareness
An important factor in increasing the likelihood that a school will achieve the goals it
has set in its Plan for Growth and Improvement is to ensure broad ownership of the
planning process and the Plan for Growth and Improvement across the entire school
and its stakeholder community. This is accomplished by ensuring broad based
knowledge and understanding of and support for the school’s performance objectives
and the plans to achieve them.
Therefore, an important element of the planning process communicating with the
school’s staff, students, governing board, and other stakeholders to ensure they are
aware of the requirements of the Excellence by Design protocol, the school’s planning
process, mission, objectives, action plans and, eventually, its accomplishments as it
implements its plan. The communication process should include means for obtaining
from the members of the school’s stakeholder community input and feedback regarding
the products of the planning process (i.e., mission, objectives, action plans).
Stakeholders cannot support and take ownership in what the school is doing unless
they first know about it and are invited to join in the process.
The primary purpose of communication is to develop a critical mass within the school’s
community of stakeholders with knowledge about, understanding of, and support for
the planning process and the Plan for Growth and Improvement in student learning
and the organization’s capacity to produce learning at the level expected.
In order to ensure that all essential stakeholder groups are aware of the Middle States
process, there must be as much transparency and inclusion as possible.
The community of stakeholders will be kept informed through the following means
School Website
Online School Communications
Parish Bulletin
Faculty Meetings
School Reach and Constant Contact
Home and School Association General Meetings
Local Newspapers
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 14
Self-Study Document
© 2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
F. A Plan for Periodic Reviews of the Plan for Growth and
Improvement
In order to institutionalize a planning ethic, continuous growth and improvement in
student and organizational performance must become a way of life within the school. It
must be an ongoing, dynamic, and “evergreen” process. It is expected and required that
the Plan for Growth and Improvement that is developed and presented for
accreditation will be implemented faithfully over the length of the accreditation term.
Consequently, it should be anticipated, and it should be expected that implementing the
activities of the action plans and gathering the results of the assessments used to
measure the student and organizational performance objectives will indicate there is a
need to revise the action plans regularly based on what is working and what is not.
Therefore, the Excellence by Design protocol includes the requirement for formal reviews
of the action plans and progress toward achieving the performance objectives are
conducted periodically but, as a minimum, at least once annually.
The members of the Planning Team will review the implementation of the Action Plan
twice a year – fall and spring. Responses, gauging the success and effectiveness of the
implementation of the Action Plan, will be gathered via surveys. The results of the
surveys will be reviewed and shared with all stakeholders. Based on the responses,
necessary revisions will be made to the Action Plan. The Planning Team will
communicate regularly with committee members and stakeholders at faculty meetings
and Home and School meetings to promote engagement in the process.
The strategies for periodic review of the Plan for Growth and Improvement will
include:
Invite feedback from stakeholders throughout the implementation process.
Identify objectives which would require additional financial resources.
Obtain financial support to achieve objectives.
Plan calendars and schedules to assure timely analysis of surveys and
feedback especially during regular faculty meetings.
Maintain a record of work for annual and the third year reevaluation.
Recognize successes of the implementation of the action plan through
assemblies, school events and publication on the website, in the school
communications and in the parish bulletin.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 15
Self-Study Document
© 2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
THE PROFILE OF THE SCHOOL
he Profile of the School includes the following information and data that 1)
describe the community(ies) the school serves and in which it exists, 2) help to
develop an understanding of the school’s Mission, and 3) and describe the
opportunities for and challenges to the school as it seeks to achieve its Mission. The
Profile includes:
A brief history of the community, its schools, and its traditions
Descriptions of the demographic and social and economic characteristics of the
community, its constituencies, and its schools
The climate for teaching and learning in the school
Description of the number and qualifications of the professional and support
staffs
Description of the number and characteristics of the student population
Key trends or changes occurring in the school and its community(ies)
The data and information contained in the Profile of the School are not evaluated by the
Visiting Team. Instead, the Profile serves two purposes:
To ensure that the members of the Planning Team have a common knowledge
base about the history and current status of the school in those areas on which
the accreditation of the school will focus; and
To “introduce” members of the Visiting Team to the school, and as such,
provides one of the lenses through which Team members will view and evaluate
the school. Thus, the Profile section should provide sufficient information about
the school and its students’ performance to build and enhance Team members’
awareness and understanding of the total milieu in which the school exists and
operates.
T
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 16
Self-Study Document
© 2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
PROFILE OF THE SCHOOL COMMUNITY
A.1. Provide a description of the community. Describe its history and major
characteristics, including geographic location and socioeconomic and demographic
makeup.
St. Joseph School is located in the borough of Downingtown, Chester County,
Pennsylvania. Our school is situated in southeastern Pennsylvania, along the Route 30
corridor approximately 30 miles west of the city of Philadelphia. The route 30 area is
one of the most rapidly developing areas within southeastern Pennsylvania.
With close to 4,500 families making up the greater whole, St. Joseph is the second-
largest parish in the Archdiocese of Philadelphia. St. Joseph has grown steadily in the
past 10 years and expects this growth to continue in years ahead.
The majority of the students enrolled in the school reside in the Downingtown Area and
Coatesville Area School Districts, that percentage being 97%. Our parish has a diverse
socioeconomic makeup, evident in the increase of families applying for and qualifying
for tuition assistance through the EITC program.
A.2. Describe any changes in the community occurring over the last five years that
have had an impact on the school. Indicate any changes that are expected to
occur during the next five years.
Last Five Years:
More students have been admitted that require educational support.
Introduction of Spanish instruction in Grades 5-8 in September 2009.
Opening of Downingtown Area School District STEM Academy in September,
2010.
Our Pastor was suddenly removed from our Parish in early 2011.
Opening of Pre-Kindergarten for 3- and 4-year-olds in September, 2011.
Additional Deacon joined our Parish in 2012.
Increased enrollment of students in charter and cyber schools.
New church dedicated in June, 2013.
DASD has instituted some full-day Kindergarten classes.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 17
Self-Study Document
© 2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
Next Five Years:
Opening of Downingtown Area School District 6th Grade Center in September
2014.
Anticipated recovery of the 2008 recession.
Residential development will increase in parts of the parish/school boundaries.
Continued use of various marketing strategies for the school.
Opening of additional classrooms, including resource rooms, in Pope John Paul
II Regional Elementary School.
A.3. Describe the major challenges currently faced by the community—social,
economic, political.
Anticipated realignment of boundaries for local public school districts.
Implementation of 1:1 technology in some local public schools.
Finance Council works to keep tuition costs affordable.
Cost of parochial high school tuition results in families choosing to leave Catholic
Schools in the middle grades.
Fewer families practicing their Catholic faith.
A.4. List the major educational and cultural programs and facilities in the
community that are available for use by the schools and their students.
Program/Facility
Archdiocesan Boys Choir
Archdiocesan Elementary Choir
Archdiocesan Elementary Honor Band
Bishop Shanahan 8th Grade Visitation Day
Bishop Shanahan Art Show
Bishop Shanahan Musical & Pep Band invitations
Boy Scouts and Girl Scouts
Chester County Historical Society
Chester County Intermediate Unit (various programs)
Chester County Public Library System
Chester County Science Fair
Chester County Youth Orchestra
Class trips to various religious, cultural and historical venues
Creative Communications Poetry contest
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 18
Self-Study Document
© 2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
Program/Facility
Downingtown Parks and Recreations
Home & School sponsored activities at local sports facilities
Knights of Columbus Drug & Alcohol prevention contest
Penn State Career Day for Women
Philadelphia Soul sponsored fitness program
Raytheon sponsored Math Counts
West Chester University Planetarium
Wilmington Blue Rocks school band performance
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 19
Self-Study Document
© 2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
PROFILE OF THE SCHOOL
B.1. History of the School:
Provide a brief history of the school. Include key milestones and developments in the
life of the school.
In February 1954, St. Joseph Parish broke ground on Downingtown’s first Catholic
elementary school. The original school opened the following September on
Pennsylvania Avenue. With the opening of the school came the blessing of the guidance
and community presence of the Sisters, Servants of the Immaculate Heart of Mary to
Downingtown.
The school opened with 274 students, nearly half of whom were in first and second
grades. The school, a two-story brick building, was modern in every respect and
included eight classrooms, a kitchen, cafeteria, and an auditorium large enough to seat
450 people. The school taught first through eighth grades. However, for its second and
third years, the school was granted permission to add a ninth and tenth grade until
Bishop Shanahan, the new Catholic high school under construction, was completed.
By 1987, the parish and school had grown in families and students. The elementary
school was now more than 20 years old, and not only needed repairs, but it was also too
small to meet the parish’s needs. Plans were made to build the Education Center, and
ground was broken in 1986. Much of the construction funding came from the estate of
former St. Joseph School teacher, Karen Butterfield. Parishioners also helped fund the
construction.
The Education Center opened in September 1987. By the mid-1990’s it became clear that
the school did not have the space necessary for our ever growing, always busy parish
community. In 1999, the parish-funded expansion created 11 additional classrooms, a
gym and the Parish Meeting Center.
Today, the school provides a Catholic education approximately 630 students in Grades
Pre-K – 8. As we look to the future, there promises to be more changes for the school.
We are constantly evaluating the needs of our student population in an effort to deliver
the best educational experience possible. There will be continued and ongoing upgrades
in technology, reviews of the best instructional tools and programs available for our
students, and further improvements to our facilities. While much has changed over the
years, much has also remained the same. As we celebrate our 60th anniversary, our
mission remains constant… providing a strong Catholic education rooted in faith,
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 20
Self-Study Document
© 2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
academics and service in Downingtown. We look forward to more changes ahead,
while celebrating the traditions and accomplishments of the past that make us St.
Joseph School.
B.2. Description of the School:
Official Name of the
School Saint Joseph School
Address of the Main
Campus (street address,
city, state, zip code)
340 Manor Avenue
Downingtown, PA 19335
Telephone Number of
Main Campus 610-269-8999
Fax Number of Main
Campus
610-269-2252
Name and Title of Head of
School Sister Catherine I. Masino, IHM
E-mail Address of Head of
the School [email protected]
Website Address for the
School www.stjosephrc.org/school
Type of Organization
(check all that apply)
Public
Independent
X Not for Profit
Proprietary
X Religious
X Academic
Career and Technical
Secondary Students
Postsecondary Students
Year School Began
Operating 1954
Year of First Graduating
Class 1955
State/Agency/Country
Granting License to
Pennsylvania
Archdiocese of Philadelphia
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 21
Self-Study Document
© 2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
Operate United States of America
Diplomas/ Certificates/
School is Licensed to
Grant
8th Grade Diploma
Calendar System (quarter,
semester, trimester, 12-
month, other)
Trimester System
Currently Accredited by Name of Agency Accredited Until
Middle States Association Spring 2015
B.3. SCHOOL INFORMATION: INDEPENDENT, RELIGIOUS, AND
PROPRIETARY SCHOOLS
This section is not applicable to our school.
Is the school incorporated? Yes
X No
If yes, Name of Corporation:
Is the school licensed to operate as an
educational school?
X Yes
No
If yes,
In what state(s) is the school licensed to
operate?
Pennsylvania
In what country(ies) is the school
licensed to operate?
United States of America
If no, explain the school’s authority to
operate:
Is the school licensed to grant diplomas
or certificates?
X Yes
No
If yes,
In what state(s) is the school licensed to
grant diplomas or certificates?
Pennsylvania
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 22
Self-Study Document
© 2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
Type(s) of diplomas or certificates
offered
8th Grade Diploma
If no, explain the school’s authority to
grant diplomas or certificates:
Religious Affiliation: Roman Catholic
B.5. SCHOOL INFORMATION: ALL SCHOOLS
B.5.a. Enrollment Trends
FOR THE ACADEMIC YEAR: 2014 -- 2015
Grades
Included in
This School
PAST PRESENT PROJECTED
BOYS/GIRLS
Two Years
Ago
BOYS/GIRLS
One Year
Ago
BOYS/GIRLS
This Year
BOYS/GIRLS
Next Year
PK3 2 8 9 7 15 9 12 12
PK4 12 13 16 17 23 16 21 18
Kindergarten 49 30 35 36 33 28 35 28
Grade 1 30 33 40 31 31 33 33 28
Grade 2 33 39 34 32 42 28 31 33
Grade 3 27 41 34 38 29 34 42 28
Grade 4 39 30 24 40 32 38 29 34
Grade 5 31 36 37 31 22 38 32 38
Grade 6 29 38 31 31 35 33 22 38
Grade 7 27 43 26 37 28 30 35 33
Grade 8 24 36 26 42 24 37 28 30
TOTALS 303 347 312 342 314 324 320 320
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 23
Self-Study Document
© 2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
B.5.a.1. Explain any significant or unusual enrollment trends for this school.
During the summer of 2014, 15 children moved out of the area: a family of three to
Texas, another family of three to Florida, a family of two to North Carolina, a family of
three to Indiana, a family of two to New Jersey, and two families of two to New York.
Some families chose the local public schools, but they did not inform us until the end of
the summer. This was an anomaly for this current year. Our Kindergarten to Grade 1
enrollment decreased when some families chose to go to public school after completing
full-day Kindergarten at St. Joseph School.
B.5.b. Student Demographic Trends:
FOR THE ACADEMIC YEAR: 2014 -- 2015
Student Characteristic:
ETHNICITY
Percent of Student Body
Now
Percent of Student Body
Two Years Ago
African-American 0.6% 1.2%
Asian 3.6% 3.1%
Caucasian/White 90.5% 89.8%
Hispanic 1.2% 1.9%
Multiracial 3.8% 3.6%
Native American 0.3% 0.4%
TOTAL 100% 100%
B.5.b.1. Explain any significant or unusual demographic trends for this school.
The student population has been predominantly Caucasian/White since its
establishment in 1954.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 24
Self-Study Document
© 2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
B.5.c. Size of the Professional and Support Staffs:
FOR THE ACADEMIC YEAR: 2014 - 2015
Full-Time Part-time Total Full-Time
Equivalent
ADMINISTRATIVE
STAFF:
Administrators 2 0 2
INSTRUCTIONAL
STAFF:
Classroom teachers-
elementary/lower
school
22 1 22.5
Classroom teachers-
middle school 10 1 10
STUDENT
SERVICES STAFF:
Guidance/college/
career counselors** 1 0 1
Specialists and
consultants** 3 0 3
Technology services
personnel 1 1 1.5
Information
resources/ library
personnel
0 2 1
Health services
personnel 0 2 1
SUPPORT STAFF:
Paraprofessionals
and aides 0 16 8
Secretaries and clerks 1 0 1
Custodial personnel* 0 0 0
Maintenance
personnel 3 0 3
Food services
personnel 0 2 1
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 25
Self-Study Document
© 2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
Full-Time Part-time Total Full-Time
Equivalent
Security personnel 0 0 0
*These services are outsourced to a cleaning company.
**These services are provided by the Chester County Intermediate Unit and are not employed
by St. Joseph School.
B.5.c.1. Describe significant trends in size of the staff that have had or may have an
impact on the education program, provision of student services, personnel,
facilities or finances.
All aides are part-time, requiring no benefits, allowing aides for the full day for
Kindergarten and part-time aides in Pre-K and Grades 1 to 3.
Grade 3 was reduced to one rotating aide for all three classrooms for three hours.
Full-time nurse was replaced by two part-time nurses.
B.5.d. Experience of the Staff:
FOR THE ACADEMIC YEAR: 2014 - 2015
Years 0-1 2-5 6-10 11-20 over 20
Administrative
Staff
Women 0 0 0 0 2
Men 0 0 0 0 0
Instructional Staff
Women 2 4 2 14 12
Men 0 0 0 0 0
Student Services
Staff
Women 1 1 2 1 5***
Men 0 0 0 0 0
Support Staff
Women 0 14 4 1 0
Men 1 1 1 0 0
***Includes those who provide services through the Chester County Intermediate Unit and are
not employed by St. Joseph School.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 26
Self-Study Document
© 2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
B.5.d.1. Describe significant trends in experience of the staff that have had or may
have an impact on the education program, provision of student services,
personnel, facilities or finances.
More than 75% of staff has more than ten years of teaching experience.
Potential for large staff turnover within next 5 years due to retirement.
Teachers changing careers due to increased financial needs in their families.
B.5.e. Academic Preparation of the Professional Staff:
FOR THE ACADEMIC YEAR: 2014 - 2015
Associate’s
or No
Degree
Bachelor’s
Degree
Bachelor’s
Degree
plus
hours
Master’s
Degree
Master’s
Degree
plus
hours
Doctorate
Administrative
Staff
Women 0 0 0 2 0 0
Men 0 0 0 0 0 0
Instructional
Staff
Women 0 6 18 7 5 0
Men 0 0 0 0 0 0
Student
Services Staff
Women 1 0 2 6 1 0
Men 0 0 0 0 0 0
B.5.e.1. Describe significant trends in the academic preparation of the staff that have
had or may have an impact on the education program, provision of student
services, personnel, facilities or finances.
With the implementation of the online grading and report card system, the teachers
have required professional development, webinars, and peer support for both Option C
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 27
Self-Study Document
© 2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
and My Students Progress. The new LabLearner Science Curriculum also required
additional training for the teachers. After-school i-Pad training was provided for the
faculty and many have also participated in professional development classes with the
Chester County Intermediate Unit.
B.5.f. Professional Certifications of the Professional Staff:
FOR THE ACADEMIC YEAR: 2014 - 2015
No
Certificate
Emergency
Certificate
Elementary
Level
Certificate
Middle
Level
Certificate
Secondary
Level
Certificate
Administrative
Certificate
Administrative
Staff
Women 0 0 2 0 1 2
Men 0 0 0 0 0 0
Instructional
Staff
Women 4 0 24 6 10 0
Men 0 0 0 0 0 0
Student
Services Staff
Women 4 0 4 0 0 0
Men 0 0 0 0 0 0
+ Some faculty members are certified in multiple levels.
B.5.f.1. Describe significant trends in the professional certification of the staff that
have had or may have an impact on the education program, provision of
student services, personnel, facilities or finances.
Some of our faculty members were certified in a different state and they are working
towards their Pennsylvania state certification. Other faculty members completed their
degrees and still need to complete their Praxis tests. Some faculty members are certified
in multiple levels. There have been changes to the grade-level certifications, and this
might impact future professional certifications.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 28
Self-Study Document
© 2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
B.5.g. Staff Demographic Trends:
FOR THE ACADEMIC YEAR: 2014 - 2015
Race/Ethnicity Percent of Staff in
Current Year
Percent of Staff Two
Years Ago
African-American 0% 0%
Asian 0% 0%
Caucasian/White 100% 100%
Hispanic 0% 0%
Native American Indian 0% 0%
Other: 0% 0%
Other: 0% 0%
TOTAL 100% 100%
B.5.g.1. Describe significant trends in the demographics of the staff that have had or
may have an impact on the education program, provision of student services,
personnel, facilities or finances.
NA
B.5.h. Staff Turnover:
B.5.a. Indicate the percentage of each category below that were new hires (or
assumed a new position within the school) in the year indicated.
FOR THE ACADEMIC YEAR: 2014 - 2015
Percent New Hires
Three Years Ago
Percent New Hires
Two Years Ago
Percent New Hires
One Year Ago
Administrative
Staff 0% 0% 0%
Instructional Staff 0% 11% 11%
Student Services
Staff 0% 0% 33%
Support Staff 0% 50% 0%
TOTAL 0% 11% 12%
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 29
Self-Study Document
© 2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
B.5.h.2 Indicate the percentage of each category below that left the staff or moved
to a new position) in the year indicated.
Percent
Changeover Three
Years Ago
Percent
Changeover Two
Years Ago
Percent
Changeover One
Year Ago
Administrative
Staff 0% 0% 0%
Instructional Staff 0% 9% 8%
Student Services
Staff 0% 0% 33%
Support Staff 0% 33% 0%
TOTAL 0% 9% 11%
B.5.h.3. Describe significant trends in staff turnover that have had or may have an
impact on the education program, provision of student services, personnel,
facilities or finances.
Some faculty members have retired in recent years and this trend looks to continue, as
many teachers get closer to retirement. Some of the new faculty members are recent
college graduates and other teachers have returned to teaching after raising their
children. The trend is for our faculty to have a greater diversity of experience in future
years.
B.5.i. Participation In and Support for the School:
Parents
X Exceeds Expectations
Satisfactory
Needs Improvement
Unsatisfactory
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 30
Self-Study Document
© 2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
Community members and organizations
Exceeds Expectations
X Satisfactory
Needs Improvement
Unsatisfactory
The business community
Exceeds Expectations
X Satisfactory
Needs Improvement
Unsatisfactory
B.5.j. Relationships with Authorities and Agencies:
Evaluate the quality of the school’s relationships with local authorities and government agencies.
X Exceeds Expectations
Satisfactory
Needs Improvement
Unsatisfactory
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 31
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
PROFILE OF STUDENT PERFORMANCE
he Profile of Student Performance includes the following information and data
that describe the levels of student performance on assessments that are most
respected by the members of the school’s community of stakeholders, valued by
the school’s professional staff, and/or required by the state or federal governments. The
Profile includes:
Data for standardized academic assessments.
Data for school-based academic assessments.
Data for achievement indicators such as graduation rate, college rigorous
courses, college acceptance, etc.
Data for citizenship measures such as attendance, promptness, discipline, etc.
Data for state academic assessments, if applicable.
Collecting and tracking data that describe how well the school’s students are
performing in the areas that are normally used by the school’s community of
stakeholders to determine if the school is accomplishing its mission is important for the
following reasons:
The school needs these data to determine if it is making progress toward
achieving its mission;
The school needs these data to determine if its graduates are meeting the
expectations expressed in the school’s Profile of Graduates;
The school needs these data to help it determine in which areas of student
performance there are the largest gaps between what is expected and how
students are performing and, therefore, what the focus of the school’s Plan for
Growth and Improvement should be.
T
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 32
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
B. ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE DATA—ALL SCHOOLS
B.1. Results of Standardized Academic Assessments:
FOR THE ACADEMIC YEAR: 2013 -- 2014
N.B. A more detailed report is available for review.
B.1.a. Provide a description of proposed improvements and/or corrective actions
that need to be taken for students performing below standard. Include a
description of actions that have been initiated or are formally planned.
The Chester County Intermediate Unit provides remediation and support for students
in Mathematics, Reading, and Speech/Language who might perform below the
standard and/or struggle within the classroom setting. In Grades 1 - 3 Math, and in the
other subject areas, students receive direct instruction in a separate setting. In Grades 4
and 5, the CCIU Math Specialist provides direction instruction in the math classroom.
SAINT JOSEPH SCHOOL
TERRA NOVA SCORES ~ SPRING, 2014
READING ENGLISH LANGUAGE
ARTS
LANGUAGE MATH TOTAL SCORE
SCIENCE SOCIAL STUDIES
KINDERGARTEN 80 - - 84 84 - -
GRADE 1 71 - - 75 81 69 73
GRADE 2 73 - - 73 74 66 68
GRADE 3 81 81 76 75 82 83 76
GRADE 4 82 83 79 73 85 68 79
GRADE 5 72 80 80 78 82 72 79
GRADE 6 81 83 78 78 86 79 79
GRADE 7 81 89 91 87 92 75 85
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 33
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
In Grades 6, 7, and 8, math support occurs at the end of the math period. In Grades 6 -
8, if additional support is needed in Reading, the students may be excluded from their
Spanish class for more direct instruction. St. Joseph School has a Student Support Team
(SST) which meets weekly to provide assistance to teachers who identify students who
are struggling. The Guidance Counselor, Reading Specialist, Principal, and teachers
from Grades 2, 3, and 7 form the SST. If there is relatively slow or no progress after the
SST and additional accommodations, then students can be recommended for
educational psychological evaluations through their local school districts. If students
are identified with an IEP, then a modification plan with the Administration, teacher,
and parents may be implemented.
B.2. Retention in Grade:
FOR THE ACADEMIC YEAR: 2013 -- 2014
Grade Level Sub-Group of Students Percentage Retained in
Grade
K to 7
All 0.1%
K 1%
1 0%
2 0%
3 0%
4 0%
5 0%
6 0%
7 0%
B.3. Honor Roll:
FOR THE ACADEMIC YEAR: 2013 – 2014
St Joseph School does not have an Honor Roll program.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 34
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
B.4. GRADE POINT AVERAGE:
FOR THE ACADEMIC YEAR: 2013 -- 2014
Grade Level Sub-Group of Students Average GPA
4-8
All 89.6
4 92
5 90
6 89
7 89
8 88
D. CITIZENSHIP PERFORMANCE DATA—ALL SCHOOLS
D.1. Attendance:
FOR THE ACADEMIC YEAR: 2013 -- 2014
Grade Level Sub-Group of Students Percentage Absent 10 or
More Days2
K to 8
All 20%
K 23%
1 20%
2 21%
3 14%
4 20%
5 13%
6 28%
7 13%
8 19%
2 The school may change this standard to meet the generally accepted standard for the school.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 35
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
D.2. Tardiness:
FOR THE ACADEMIC YEAR: 2013 -- 2014
Grade Level Sub-Group of Students
Percentage Late to School
10 or More Days
K to 8
All 2%
K 5%
1 1%
2 0%
3 0%
4 0%
5 3%
6 5%
7 2%
8 6%
D.3. Suspensions from School:
FOR THE ACADEMIC YEAR: 2013 -- 2014
Grade Level Sub-Group of Students Percentage Suspended
One or More Times
K to 8
All 0%
1 0%
2 0%
3 0%
4 0%
5 0%
6 0%
7 0%
8 0%
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 36
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
D.4. Expulsions:
FOR THE ACADEMIC YEAR: 2013 -- 2014
Grade Level Sub-Group of Students Percentage Expelled
K to 8
All 0%
1 0%
2 0%
3 0%
4 0%
5 0%
6 0%
7 0%
8 0%
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 37
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
THE SCHOOL’S MISSION,
BELIEFS, AND PROFILE OF GRADUATES
he foundation for an effective plan for improving student performance and the
organization's capacity to achieve the levels of performance desired and expected
is established by the school's Mission, Beliefs, and Profile of Graduates. These
foundational documents answer the following questions:
What is our vision for a better future for the children of our school?
What beliefs or core values will guide our journey?
What will our students have to know, be able to do, and to demonstrate for us to achieve
our mission?
A. MISSION
A school’s Mission should reflect the deepest desires of the school’s community of
stakeholders for what they want the school to become—its future in terms of what it
will do for its students. The mission expresses what the adults in the school community
commit themselves to doing for the benefit of the students.
A mission statement should describe in broad and visionary terms what the school is
striving to become. A mission should be outcome-based, providing clarity regarding the
school’s audience (whom it serves), its action (what it commits to doing for its
audience), its aim (the purposes for which it exists) and its means (how, in broad terms,
it will its purposes).
While it is not appropriate for a Visiting Team to determine whether the school’s
Mission is the right or wrong mission for the school or a good or bad mission. Nor is it
appropriate for the Team to require changes to the Mission.
A Visiting Team will, however, offer an objective perspective regarding whether any
elements of the Mission are unclear or seem inconsistent or incomplete or whether the
school and its community of stakeholders support and are “walking the talk” of the
Mission. However, it is up to the school to decide if the Team’s comments are legitimate
and relevant. It is in this spirit that the following observations on the school’s mission.
T
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 38
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
What is the school’s Mission?
Saint Joseph School offers an education that combines Catholic tradition with academic
excellence. As a community grounded in humility, compassion and self-respect,
students are inspired and encouraged to imitate the qualities of our patron, St. Joseph.
Who among the school's community of stakeholders was involved in the
development/revision/reaffirmation of the school's Mission?
The Planning Team, through weekly meetings, guided the development of the School’s
Mission. The final Mission Statement was presented to the faculty at a meeting on
February 17, 2014.
Provide a brief description of process used to develop/revise/reaffirm the school's
Mission.
Feedback regarding the previous Mission statement was requested from the staff
during an October 2013 faculty meeting. The faculty was then asked to focus on the
qualities of St. Joseph to incorporate into the Mission Statement. The Planning Team
reviewed the feedback and made the necessary revisions.
B. BELIEFS
tatements of belief serve as the foundation of a strong strategic plan. They are the
formal expression of a school’s fundamental values and serve as its ethical code.
Beliefs describe the moral character of a school. In a planning process involving
diverse stakeholder groups, they represent the composite of the personal values held by
individual planning team members.
Because beliefs are a matter of faith, not a matter of fact, they express the school’s
overriding convictions, its inviolate commitments. They outline what members of the
school’s community of stakeholders are willing to “go to the mat” defending. Because
beliefs identify the “line in the sand,” they can be used as a lens through which to
examine the worthiness of the school’s potential decisions or future actions.
S
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 39
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
Only members of the school community can identify their deeply held beliefs. A
Visiting Team can, however, offer an objective perspective on what is unclear or seems
inconsistent or incomplete in the school’s Beliefs. Ultimately, however, it is the school
that has to decide if the Team’s comments are legitimate and relevant. It is in this spirit
that the following observations on the school’s Beliefs are made.
What are the school’s Beliefs?
We believe that
The life and teaching of Jesus Christ is the foundation of all learning.
A Catholic learning environment shows reverence for God, for each other and for
creation.
Strengthened by our faith, students will acquire knowledge, skills and attitudes to
research and interact with information effectively.
Service is an essential part of the education of our students.
Academic excellence is the shared responsibility of the parish, the administration
and faculty, family, student and community.
Through rigorous academics and varied assessments, students are prepared to be
life-long learners through the 21st Century.
Every student is valued for his/her unique gifts and talents.
Who among the school's community of stakeholders was involved in the
development/revision/reaffirmation of the school's Beliefs?
The entire faculty provided input on the revision of the school’s belief statements.
Provide a brief description of process used to develop/revise/reaffirm the school's
Beliefs.
In November 2013, the faculty met as a whole to brainstorm a list of belief statements
that characterize St. Joseph School. From a list of over 60 suggestions, the Planning
Team met to develop a more concise list. The selected Belief Statements were then
presented to the Faculty for approval. At a February 2014 faculty meeting, the Belief
Statements received unanimous approval and were adopted. The Belief Statements
were presented to parents at the September Back-to-School nights. Along with the
Mission Statement, the Beliefs are posted within the School and on the School’s website.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 40
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
C. PROFILE OF GRADUATES
he Profile of Graduates provides the answer to the following question: When our
students have completed our entire educational program and have had the
benefit of the services and activities provided by the institution and its
community:
What do we expect them to know?
What do we expect them to be able to do with what they know?
What qualities or characteristics do we want them to demonstrate?
A Profile of Graduates:
Describes the students at the point of exit from the institution.
States the values, achievement, and readiness that each student will manifest
upon graduation.
Should be considered both as a Bill of Rights and set of corresponding
responsibilities for students, faculty, staff, administration, and the institution’s
community.
Defines the outcomes each and every student will attain if the mission is
operative and appropriately translated into programs and services.
A Profile of Graduates serves to:
Translate the identity, vision, and values expressed in the beliefs and mission
into statements that describe student outcomes.
Translate and transform concepts from the ideal and global to specific expression
in the development of a student in the institution.
Give expression to what the mission means in the operational life of the
institution.
Define an outline or shape each student is expected to grow into regardless of
specific courses taken or post-graduation plans.
A concrete reference point for faculty, staff, and the institution’s community
when designing curriculum, instructional experiences, service programs,
auxiliary resources, and student and family services.
T
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 41
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
What is the school’s Profile of Graduates?
Graduates will live their Catholic faith by:
embracing God in every aspect of life
serving others through God and His Church
responding to future challenges guided by the values of morality and integrity.
Graduates will demonstrate academic excellence by:
mastering a rigorous curriculum through disciplined work habits and study
skills
appreciating each person’s unique gifts and talents
becoming life-long learners through critical thinking and effective
communication.
Graduates will exemplify the qualities of a leader by
assuming dynamic roles in their education, activities and interests
remaining active stewards in their parish and community
motivating others to do their best while striving to do the same.
Who among the school's community of stakeholders was involved in the
development/revision/reaffirmation of the school's Profile of Graduates?
The Planning Team, which consisted of faculty, parents and graduates, developed a list
which exemplifies what we expect of our graduates.
Provide a brief description of process used to develop/revise/reaffirm the school's
Profile of Graduates.
The lists that were generated by the Planning Team were presented to the faculty. Each
person was given the opportunity to add to/ revise graduate qualities we expect.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 42
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 43
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
THE PROFILE OF ORGANIZATIONAL CAPACITY
he Profile of Organizational Capacity provides information and data that portray
the school’s capacity to produce the levels of student performance the school and
its community of stakeholders desire and expect. The Profile consists of the
results of a self-assessment of the school’s adherence to the Middle States Standards for
Accreditation.
The twelve Standards for Accreditation reflect research-based best practices for quality
in schools. The Standards also represent the organizational “building blocks” that need
to be in place to produce high levels of student performance. The self-assessment leads
to identifying the school’s strengths and areas in need of improvement.
The Profile also provides those responsible for developing the school’s Plan for Growth
and Improvement with a good understanding of the current status of the school.
Standards for Accreditation for Schools: Elementary, Middle, High, and
PreK-12 Institutions
Foundational Standards: Standards addressing best practices in the components of a
school that provide the foundations for quality in the education program, services,
and results in terms of student learning.
Standard 1: Philosophy/Mission
Standard 2: Governance and Leadership
Standard 3: School Improvement Planning
Standard 4: Finances
Standard 5: Facilities
Standard 6: School Climate and Organization
Operational Standards: Standards addressing best practices in delivering the
education program, services, and activities to the students.
Standard 7: Health and Safety
Standard 8: Educational Program
Standard 9: Assessment and Evidence of Student Learning
Standard 10: Student Services
Standard 11: Student Life and Student Activities
Standard 12: Information Resources and Technology
T
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 44
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
Method(s) Used to Conduct the Self-Assessment of Adherence to the
Standards for Accreditation
A. By Standards Surveys
X YES NO The self-assessment was conducted using the surveys
provided by the Middle States Association.
Total Number of Surveys
Returned 409
The results represent surveys
completed by:
Students 259 (Grades 4-7)
Parents 108
Faculty and Staff 40
Administrators 2
B. By a Committee
YES X NO The self-assessment was conducted by a committee
for all the Standards.
Committee Member’s Name Role in the School’s Community (e.g. teacher, parent,
student, etc.)
**NOTE: Committee size and composition may vary depending upon the school’s size, the
topic to be addressed, etc. If needed, add lines to the above chart.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 45
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
PHILOSOPHY/MISSION STANDARD FOR
ACCREDITATION
A. Issues Related To This Standard
The following requirements ask the school to provide a self-assessment of expectations
for quality included in this Standard for Accreditation. The information and data
requested in this section are not for evaluation purposes. Instead, the information and
data assist the school in making the determination whether it meets the Standard and
its Indicators of Quality.
A.1. List the people who participated in the most recent development/review of the
philosophy/mission and the stakeholder group each participant represents.
Name Stakeholder Group
Mrs. Bernadette Louden Teacher/Parent of Alumni
Mrs. Catherine Herb Teacher/Parent
Sister Catherine Irene Masino, IHM Principal
Sister Rita Doyle, IHM Vice-Principal
Sister Christine Lamb Teacher
Mrs. Kathleen Mullen Teacher/Parent of Alumni
Mrs. Karen McDonald Teacher/Parent of Alumni
Mrs. Lorraine Geiling Teacher/Parent of Alumni
A.2. List the date(s) of the most recent revision/adoption of the school's
philosophy/mission.
St. Joseph School revised and adopted the school’s mission statement on February 17,
2014.
A.3. By what body was the most recent revision/adoption of the school's
philosophy/mission approved?
After discussing the Mission Statement as an entire faculty, each faculty member was
asked to write the most important ideas that they would like to see in our revised
Mission Statement. The ideas were presented to the entire group and then small groups
reviewed the ideas further. The Planning Team reviewed these ideas in greater depth.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 46
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
A43. Indicate where the philosophy/mission is formally published.
St. Joseph School Website
St. Joseph School Family Handbook
School brochures
Posters in each classroom
B. Self-Assessment of Adherence to the Indicators of Quality
The school must meet this Standard for Accreditation to be granted “Accreditation” by
the Middle States Association. The Indicators of Quality for the Standard identify the
types of evidence that, when taken together, indicate whether the school meets the
Standard. The school may indicate other types of evidence particular to the school in the
“Other” section provided below. Rate the degree to which the school meets each
Indicator by using the following scale:
Rating of Adherence to the Indicator
1. Does Not Meet The evidence indicates the school does not meet the
expectations of this Indicator
2. Partially Meets/In
Need of Improvement
The evidence indicates that the school partially meets the
expectations of this Indicator and is in need of
improvement
3. Meets The evidence indicates the school meets the expectations
of this Indicator
4. Exceeds The evidence indicates the school exceeds the expectations
of this Indicator
Middle States Association Accreditation Standard 1:
Philosophy/Mission
The Standard: The school has a clearly written and actively implemented statement
of philosophy/mission that conveys the general and specific purposes of its educational
program, expresses expectations for quality, and serves as the basis for daily
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 47
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
operational and instructional decision making as well as long-range planning.
Stakeholders give input into the development of the school’s philosophy/mission and
understand and accept it. This document is aligned with the community served and is
reviewed periodically by stakeholder representatives.
1.1. – 1.5: Indicators for all schools
MSA Indicator of Quality Rating
1 2 3 4
1.1 The school takes steps to ensure that students and
their families understand and support the school’s
philosophy/mission.
X
1.2 The philosophy/mission is free of contradiction,
ambiguity, and excessive abstraction. X
1.3 The philosophy/mission is consistent with ethical
norms and demonstrates respect for persons of all
races, creeds, and cultures.
X
1.4 The school implements a system to assess its
effectiveness in fulfilling its philosophy/mission. X
1.5 The school’s philosophy/mission is clearly
communicated in its brochures, promotional
materials, policy and procedural handbooks, web
site, and similar resources.
X
1.6 – 1.8: Indicators for faith-based schools3
MSA Indicator of Quality Rating
1 2 3 4
1.6 The school’s religious identity is articulated
clearly in the school’s mission, beliefs and
publications.
X
3 The use of the Faith-Based Indicators for this and the other Standards for Accreditation by faith-based
schools is voluntary and not required, unless their use is directed by the head of a parent school system
such as a Diocesan/Archdiocesan or a similar system of schools. The Faith-Based Indicators allow faith-
based schools, if they desire, to include in their self-study and accreditation process Indicators of Quality
that address unique characteristics of and expectations for schools whose mission and educational
program are defined wholly or in part by their particular faith.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 48
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
MSA Indicator of Quality Rating
1 2 3 4
1.7 The school’s religious identity is integrated into its
philosophy/mission and its school-wide goals and
objectives.
X
1.8 Symbols and artifacts of the school community’s
faith are visible in the school. X
B.1. Stakeholders’ comments to support the ratings:
It was expressed by students that the faith is well known
Some students are disrespectful and not following God’s rules
B.2. Evidence:
Indicator
No. Evidence
N/A A rating of 1 or 2 was not received in any of the indicators of quality.
C. Self-Assessment of Adherence to the Standard for Accreditation
x Our self-assessment is that our school MEETS this Standard for Accreditation
Our self-assessment is that our school DOES NOT MEET this Standard for
Accreditation for the following reason(s):
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 49
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
D. Root Cause Analysis
Foundational Issue: Philosophy/Mission
Are there philosophy/mission
standard indicators not met or in
need of improvement that inhibit
the attainment of the
organizational capacity objective?
YES
X NO
Data to support your conclusion:
Stakeholders’ feedback and surveys provided
the data for this standard.
Hypothesis derived from your
conclusion:
Philosophy/Mission Statement was altered to
reflect the values of St. Joseph School.
E. Implications for Planning
E.1. List the school’s significant strengths in meeting the Philosophy/Mission
Standard.
A graduate will reflect the values of personal honesty and respect for others
o having the humility to recognize his/her own failings and the strength to
rely on others for help
o having the insight to recognize his/her own strengths and the compassion
to offer his/her help to those who are in need.
E.2. List the school’s significant areas in need of improvement in meeting the
Philosophy/Mission Standard.
We need to continue to share our Mission Statement with our students in the
classroom.
We need to display the Mission Statement and Beliefs throughout St. Joseph
school.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 50
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
E.3. Based on the strengths and areas for improvement identified, list any
important next steps or strategic priorities related to Philosophy/Mission that
should be included in the action plan in the Plan for Growth and
Improvement.
Copy of Mission Statement and Beliefs will be displayed in our hallways, on our
school website and in our school handbook.
As part of our morning announcements, the Mission Statement will be recited by
all students and faculty.
F. Evidence to Support the Assessment of This Standard
Evidence School
The school’s philosophy/mission X
Samples of publications that communicate the mission/philosophy to the
school’s community of stakeholders X
Marketing, recruitment, and admissions materials X
Address of the school’s website (stjosephrc.org) X
Policies related to the philosophy/mission X
School Handbook X
Survey results X
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 51
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
GOVERNANCE AND LEADERSHIP STANDARD FOR
ACCREDITATION
A. Issues Related To This Standard
The following requirements ask the school to provide a self-assessment of expectations
for quality included in this Standard for Accreditation.
TO BE COMPLETED BY INDEPENDENT, RELIGIOUS, AND
PROPRIETARY SCHOOLS
1. Is the school incorporated? Yes
X No
If yes, Name of Corporation:
2. Is the school licensed to operate as an
educational school?
X Yes
No
If yes,
In what state(s) is the school licensed to
operate?
Pennsylvania
In what country(ies) is the school
licensed to operate?
United States of America
If no, explain the school’s authority to
operate:
3. Is the school licensed to grant
diplomas or certificates?
X Yes
No
If yes,
In what state(s) is the school licensed to
grant diplomas or certificates?
Pennsylvania
Type(s) of diplomas or certificates
offered
8th Grade Diploma
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 52
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
For religious schools:
Religious Affiliation: Roman-Catholic
Archdiocese of Philadelphia
B. Self-Assessment of Adherence to the Indicators of Quality
The school must meet this Standard for Accreditation to be granted “Accreditation” by
the Middle States Association. The Indicators of Quality for the Standard identify the
types of evidence that, when taken together, indicate whether the school meets the
Standard. The school may indicate other types of evidence particular to the school in the
“Other” section provided below. Rate the degree to which the school meets each
Indicator by using the following scale:
Rating of Adherence to the Indicator
1. Does Not Meet The evidence indicates the school does not meet the
expectations of this Indicator
2. Partially Meets/In
Need of Improvement
The evidence indicates that the school partially meets the
expectations of this Indicator and is in need of
improvement
3. Meets The evidence indicates the school meets the expectations
of this Indicator
4. Exceeds The evidence indicates the school exceeds the expectations
of this Indicator
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 53
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
Middle States Association Accreditation Standard 2:
Governance and Leadership
The Standard: The school is chartered, licensed, or authorized by a state, nation, or
authority that operates in the public interest. The governance and leadership ensure the
integrity, effectiveness, and reputation of the school through the establishment of
policy, provision of resources, and assurance of a quality educational program. The
governance and leadership act ethically and consistently to assure an atmosphere of
mutual respect and purposeful effort on behalf of students and their learning. School
leaders foster a productive environment for teaching and learning, timely and open
communication with stakeholders, and the vision necessary for day-to-day operations
and long-term planning.
2.1 – 2.17: Indicators for schools that are not part of a public school
district, archdiocesan/diocesan system, corporation, or other
school organization with a central office staff
X These Indicators are not applicable to our school.
Governance and Leadership
2.18 – 2.38: Indicators for schools that are part of a public school district,
archdiocesan/diocesan system, corporation, or other school
organization with a central office staff
These Indicators are not applicable to our school.
Governance
MSA Indicator of Quality Rating
1 2 3 4
2.18 The school is in compliance with all applicable
statutes, ordinances, and regulations of all civil
authorities of the jurisdiction in which the school
is located.
X
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 54
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
MSA Indicator of Quality Rating
1 2 3 4
2.19 No legal or proprietary ambiguities in ownership,
control, or responsibility exist. Partnerships and
any corporate linkages in ownership/governance
are expressed as enforceable agreements.
X
2.20 The governance works cooperatively to establish
and maintain clearly formulated written policies
and procedures that are consistent with the
school’s philosophy/mission. The policies and
procedures are implemented and reviewed
regularly.
X
2.21 The governance provides appropriate
opportunities for education of the trustees/board,
including orientation and training sessions so that
all members understand their responsibilities and
roles.
X
2.22 The governance appropriately recognizes the
accomplishments of the staff and students. X
2.23 The governance provides the school with effective
leadership, support, and continuity, including
succession planning to ensure stability of the
school leadership.
X
2.24 The governance thinks and acts strategically,
reflecting on its decisions and the consequences of
its actions.
X
2.25 The governance implements a system for
evaluating its own effectiveness in performing its
duties.
X
2.26 The governance focuses its activities on selecting,
evaluating, and supporting the head of the school
system, policy development, planning, assessing
the organization’s performance, and ensuring
adequate resources to accomplish the
organization’s philosophy/mission.
X
2.27 Governance refrains from undermining the
authority of the leadership to conduct the daily
operation of the school system.
X
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 55
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
MSA Indicator of Quality Rating
1 2 3 4
2.28 The governance utilizes a clearly defined
performance appraisal system for the head of the
school system. The appraisal is conducted with
the knowledge and participation of the head of
the organization.
X
Central Office Leadership
MSA Indicator of Quality Rating
1 2 3 4
2.29 The head of the school system is accountable to
the governance and is responsible for ensuring
expected levels of student performance.
X
2.30 The central office leadership ensures that all
school system programs and activities are
adequately and appropriately planned,
supervised, resourced, and staffed with qualified
personnel.
X
2.31 The central office leadership stays well informed
of educational developments. X
2.32 The central office leadership adheres to
appropriate guidelines concerning confidentiality
in communications.
X
School Leadership
MSA Indicator of Quality Rating
1 2 3 4
2.33 The school leadership maintains appropriate and
constructive relations with families, students,
staff, the community, and with each other in the
interest of serving the needs of the students.
X
2.34 The school leadership undertakes operational,
long range, and strategic planning aimed at
accomplishing the school’s mission and goals.
X
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 56
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
MSA Indicator of Quality Rating
1 2 3 4
2.35 The head of the school is accountable to the
governance and is responsible for ensuring
expected levels of student performance.
X
2.36 The school leadership ensures that all school
programs and activities are adequately and
appropriately planned, supervised, resourced,
and staffed with qualified personnel.
X
2.37 The school leadership ensures that members of the
professional and support staffs stay well informed
of educational developments.
X
2.38 The school leadership adheres to appropriate
guidelines concerning confidentiality in
communications.
X
2.39: Indicator for schools that provide distance education
X This Indicator is not applicable to our school.
2.40– 2.47: Indicators for faith-based schools4
These Indicators are not applicable to our school.
MSA Indicator of Quality Rating
1 2 3 4
2.40 The governance and leadership articulate and
model the religious tenets of the school. X
2.41 Maintaining the religious identity of the school is a
priority of the administration. X
2.42 Policies, procedures and decisions of the
governing body and leadership are based in and X
4 The use of the Faith-Based Indicators for this and the other Standards for Accreditation by faith-based
schools is voluntary and not required, unless their use is directed by the head of a parent school system
such as a Diocesan/Archdiocesan or a similar system of schools. The Faith-Based Indicators allow faith-
based schools, if they desire, to include in their self-study and accreditation process Indicators of Quality
that address unique characteristics of and expectations for schools whose mission and educational
program are defined wholly or in part by their particular faith.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 57
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
informed by the religious values and identity of
the school.
2.43 Leadership accepts the authority of the sponsoring
religious institution. X
2.44 Planning and decision-making by the governance
and leadership engages the school community in
setting direction and ensuring the future of the
school as a faith-based institution.
X
2.45 Criteria for hiring the school’s leadership include
an assessment of the candidates’ understanding
and commitment to the religious beliefs and
mission of
N/A*
2.46 Governance and leadership promote respect and
collaboration among all members of the school's
"faith" community.
X
2.47 Attention is given to building a respectful and
collaborative "faith" community among the faculty
and staff.
X
* The Principal is assigned to the school by the Sisters, Servants of the Immaculate Heart of Mary.
B.1. Stakeholders’ comments to support the ratings:
No comments
B.2. Evidence:
Indicator No. Evidence
N/A A rating of 1 or 2 was not received in any of the indicators of quality.
C. Self-Assessment of Adherence to the Standard for Accreditation
X Our self-assessment is that our school MEETS this Standard for Accreditation
Our self-assessment is that our school DOES NOT MEET this Standard for
Accreditation for the following reason(s):
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 58
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
D. Root Cause Analysis
Foundational Issue: Governance and Leadership
Are there governance and
leadership standard indicators not
met or in need of improvement that
inhibit the attainment of the
organizational capacity objective?
YES
X NO
Data to support your conclusion:
Stakeholders feedback and surveys provided
the data for this standard.
Hypothesis derived from your
conclusion:
Parents, faculty and staff are pleased with the
leadership.
E. Implications for Planning
E.1. List the school’s significant strengths in meeting the Governance and
Leadership Standard.
Saint Joseph’s School greatest strength in the area of Governance and Leadership
is that the school’s administration has strengthened the collaboration and
communication between teachers and parents. Through the introduction and
use of communication tools such as My Student Progress, our faculty and
administrative e-mail system (Webmail), our school website and Student Study
Team meetings, the administration has been able to create a better synergy to
promote student success. Leadership adheres to appropriate guidelines
concerning confidentiality in communications.
E.2. List the school’s significant areas in need of improvement in meeting the
Governance and Leadership Standard.
Policy and onboarding procedures for new teachers and established job descriptions
need clarification.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 59
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
E.3. Based on the strengths and areas for improvement identified, list any
important next steps or strategic priorities related to Governance and
Leadership that should be included in the action plan in the Plan for Growth
and Improvement.
Policy and procedures for faculty should be revisited periodically at faculty meetings.
F. Evidence to Support the Assessment of This Standard
Evidence School
Job descriptions for the head of the institution and other key administrative
personnel X
Appraisal tool and/or description of the process used to appraise the
performance of the head of the institution X
Chart of lines of authority/responsibilities X
Policies related to governance and leadership
Policies and Procedures of the Office of Catholic Education
Parish Elementary School Lay Teachers and Administrators
Handbook
Saint Joseph School Handbook
X
Names, addresses, and organizational position of the institution’s owners
St. Joseph Parish
460 Manor Ave
Downingtown, PA 19335
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 60
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT PLANNING STANDARD FOR
ACCREDITATION
A. Issues Related To This Standard
The following requirements ask the school to provide a self-assessment of expectations
for quality included in this Standard for Accreditation. The information and data
requested in this section are not for evaluation purposes. Instead, the information and
data assist the school in making the determination whether it meets the Standard and
its Indicators of Quality.
A.1. SCHOOL PLANS
Type of Plan Yes/No
Year Last
Reviewed/
Updated
Quality/Effectiveness
of Plan
Strategic Plan/Long-
Range Plan
X 2013
X Satisfactory
Needs Improvement
Unsatisfactory
Financial Plan* X
X Satisfactory
Needs Improvement
Unsatisfactory
Facilities Plan* X
X Satisfactory
Needs Improvement
Unsatisfactory
Technology Plan X 2013
X Satisfactory
Needs Improvement
Unsatisfactory
Professional
Development Plan X 2013
X Satisfactory
Needs Improvement
Unsatisfactory
Staffing Plan
X Annually
X Satisfactory
Needs Improvement
Unsatisfactory
Institutional
Advancement and
Development Plan
X
Satisfactory
Needs Improvement
Unsatisfactory
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 61
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
*St. Joseph Parish, under the guidance of the its Finance Council, has long-range plans for
finances and facilities.
B. Self-Assessment of Adherence to the Indicators of Quality
The school must meet this Standard for Accreditation to be granted “Accreditation” by
the Middle States Association. The Indicators of Quality for the Standard identify the
types of evidence that, when taken together, indicate whether the school meets the
Standard. The school may indicate other types of evidence particular to the school in the
“Other” section provided below. Rate the degree to which the school meets each
Indicator by using the following scale:
Rating of Adherence to the Indicator
1. Does Not Meet The evidence indicates the school system does not meet
the expectations of this Indicator
2. Partially Meets/In
Need of Improvement
The evidence indicates that the school system partially
meets the expectations of this Indicator and is in need of
improvement
3. Meets The evidence indicates the school system meets the
expectations of this Indicator
4. Exceeds The evidence indicates the school system exceeds the
expectations of this Indicator
Curriculum
Review/Revision Plan X 2013
X Satisfactory
Needs Improvement
Unsatisfactory
Staffing Plan X
Satisfactory
Needs Improvement
Unsatisfactory
Student Enrollment Plan X
Satisfactory
Needs Improvement
Unsatisfactory
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 62
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
Middle States Association Accreditation Standard 3:
School Improvement Planning
The Standard: The school uses a collaborative process to develop and implement a
written strategic or long-range plan to improve its educational program and services.
Plans are aligned with the school’s philosophy/mission and its operational plans, and
are focused on continuous improvement of student performance, staff professional and
organizational growth.
3.1– 3.8: Indicators for all schools
MSA Indicator of Quality Rating
1 2 3 4
3.1 The school’s improvement plans are developed
with broad-based school community participation
and input.
X
3.2 Information about the school’s planning
processes, its improvement plans and goals, and
the results of implementing the improvement
plans are communicated to stakeholders and the
public.
X
3.3 Improvement plans are supported by the school
community and approved by the governance
where appropriate.
X
3.4 Periodic external reviews validate the school’s
processes for strategic or long-range planning and
school improvement.
X
3.5 The school can document its long-range planning
for finances, facilities, and technology
enhancement.
X
3.6 Improvement plans are based on an analysis of
historical data, baseline performance information,
trend data, and projections.
X
3.7 The school’s improvement plans are reviewed
periodically to determine the extent to which
outcomes meet expectations so that corrective
actions can be taken as needed.
X
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 63
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
MSA Indicator of Quality Rating
1 2 3 4
3.8 Planners consider the capacities of its facilities,
equipment, and staff before adopting new
programs.
X
3.9: Indicator for faith-based schools5
This Indicator is not applicable to our school.
MSA Indicator of Quality Rating
1 2 3 4
3.9 The spiritual life of the community is a priority in
all planning activities. X
B.1. Stakeholders’ comments to support the ratings:
Faculty restrooms are needed to accommodate the teachers/staff in both wings of
the second floor
Maintenance of all restrooms is needed
Air conditioning, heating, and proper ventilation need to be corrected to alleviate
health-related issues
B.2. Evidence:
Indicator
No.
Evidence
N/A A rating of 1 or 2 was not received in any of the indicators of quality.
5 The use of the Faith-Based Indicators for this and the other Standards for Accreditation by faith-based
schools is voluntary and not required, unless their use is directed by the head of a parent school system
such as a Diocesan/Archdiocesan or a similar system of schools. The Faith-Based Indicators allow faith-
based schools, if they desire, to include in their self-study and accreditation process Indicators of Quality
that address unique characteristics of and expectations for schools whose mission and educational
program are defined wholly or in part by their particular faith.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 64
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
C. Self-Assessment of Adherence to the Standard for Accreditation
X Our self-assessment is that our school MEETS this Standard for Accreditation
Our self-assessment is that our school DOES NOT MEET this Standard for
Accreditation for the following reason(s):
D. Root Cause Analysis
Foundational Issue: School Improvement Planning
Are there school improvement
planning standard indicators not
met or in need of improvement that
inhibit the attainment of the
organizational capacity objective?
YES
X NO
Data to support your conclusion:
Survey monkey results showed that all
indicators were met. Saint Joseph School
Community continues to address needs as
they arise and plan for school improvement as
resources allow.
Hypothesis derived from your
conclusion:
If improvements are completed as comments
suggest, restrooms will be available and
maintained in all areas and ventilation,
heating and cooling will be properly
regulated.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 65
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
E. Implications for Planning
E.1. List the school’s significant strengths in meeting the School Improvement
Planning Standard.
The geographical location is conducive to a healthy enrollment
The faculty and staff are dedicated and qualified
The faculty implement Common Core curriculum
The faculty is current with professional development
The students receive scholarships
The standardized test results are above the national average
The institution has Middle States Accreditation
E.2. List the school’s significant areas in need of improvement in meeting the
School Improvement Planning Standard.
Additional faculty restrooms are needed to accommodate the teachers/staff in
both wings of the second floor
Maintenance of all restrooms is needed
Air conditioning, heating, and proper ventilation need to be corrected to
alleviate health-related issues
E.3. Based on the strengths and areas for improvement identified, list any
important next steps or strategic priorities related to School Improvement
Planning that should be included in the action plan in the Plan for Growth
and Improvement.
Faculty Committees will be formed to address Strategic Plans to improve the
Professional Development of faculty. These committees will consist of Curriculum
Coordinators and other faculty members who will promote, improve, and sustain the
professional growth and development of faculty for the benefit of students.
These committees will be responsible for:
regulating Faculty Professional Development paperwork
creating pacing charts
locating workshops relating to subject areas
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 66
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
F. Evidence to Support the Assessment of This Standard
Evidence School
Strategic and/or long-range plan X
Development/institutional advancement plan X
Enrollment plan X
Policies related to school improvement planning X
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 67
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
FINANCES STANDARD FOR ACCREDITATION
A. Issues Related to this Standard
A.1. For Publicly-Funded Schools
X This section is not applicable to our school.
A.2. For Non-Public, Independent And Proprietary Schools
This section is not applicable to our school.
A.2.a. FINANCIAL RESOURCES:
INCOME SOURCE
Current Year
Last Year
% from tuition 74% 79%
% from fees 5% 4%
% from fund-raising and other special
Activities 3% 2%
% from Parish subsidy 15% 13%
% from grants 1% <1%
% from interest/investments/rental income <1% <1%
Other (describe): Cares 1% 1%
Other (describe): Lunch 1% 1%
Other (describe):
TOTAL 100% 100%
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 68
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
A.2.b. ANNUAL PER PUPIL COSTS:
PER PUPIL
COSTS
2014-2015
Current
Academic
Year
2013-2014
Last
Academic
Year
Elementary
Grades PK-8 $3,760.00 $3,662.00
A.2.c. INSURANCE FOR THE SCHOOL:
Adequacy of Coverage
TYPE OF INSURANCE Satisfactory Needs Improvement Unsatisfactory
Property liability X
Employee liability X
Administration liability X
Governing body liability X
Theft, fraud, deceit X
Tuition increase N/A
Travel and field trips X
Institution-owned vehicles N/A
A.3. Provide a description of proposed improvements and/or corrective actions that
need to be taken if a rating of “Needs Improvement” or “Unsatisfactory” is
assigned. Include a description of actions that have been initiated or are
formally planned.
At this time no improvements and/or corrective actions are needed.
A.4. Indicate any anticipated major capital expenditures within the next three
years.
Technological infrastructure wiring
Expenditure for iPads
Purchase of new Data Server (M:Drive)
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 69
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
B. Self-Assessment of Adherence to the Indicators of Quality
The school must meet this Standard for Accreditation to be granted “Accreditation” by
the Middle States Association. The Indicators of Quality for the Standard identify the
types of evidence that, when taken together, indicate whether the school meets the
Standard. The school may indicate other types of evidence particular to the school in the
“Other” section provided below. Rate the degree to which the school meets each
Indicator by using the following scale:
Rating of Adherence to the Indicator
1. Does Not Meet The evidence indicates the school system does not meet
the expectations of this Indicator
2. Partially Meets/In
Need of Improvement
The evidence indicates that the school system partially
meets the expectations of this Indicator and is in need of
improvement
3. Meets The evidence indicates the school system meets the
expectations of this Indicator
4. Exceeds The evidence indicates the school system exceeds the
expectations of this Indicator
Middle States Association Accreditation Standard 4:
Finances
The Standard: Financial resources are sufficient to provide the educational
opportunities defined in the school’s philosophy/mission. The business practices of the
school are ethical. These practices promote confidence in the school’s ability to manage
fiscal and material resources in a responsible manner and follow prescribed budgeting
and accounting principles. The majority of resources raised for school purposes is
dedicated to the school’s operations.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 70
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
4.1 – 4.12: Indicators for all schools
MSA Indicator of Quality Rating
1 2 3 4
4.1 The school implements written financial policies
and procedures that are in accordance with
accepted business practices.
X
4.2 The governance and leadership exercise prudent
control over all financial operations. X
4.3 Levels of income and expenditures are in
appropriate balance. Current assets are sufficient
to meet current liabilities.
X
4.4 Finances are currently stable and projections
indicate continuing stability. X
4.5 The school develops short- and long-range
financial plans to ensure resources are available to
deliver its educational program and services.
X
4.6 Stakeholders have opportunities to provide input
into financial plans. The staff is involved in
determining priorities for curriculum and
instructional needs.
X
4.7 Families enrolling students in the school are
informed in advance of all financial obligations for
attending the school.
X
4.8 Those entrusted with overseeing and conducting
the financial and business operations of the school
possess appropriate qualifications.
X
4.9 Periodic audits or financial reviews are conducted
by qualified external agencies and the school
responds appropriately.
X
4.10 The school has written, reasonable, and equitable
tuition, collection, and refund policies. X
4.11 The school carries adequate insurance coverage
including business interruption, casualty,
property, and liability insurance for employees
and the governance/owner, as appropriate.
X
4.12 The school makes prudent use of resources X
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 71
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
MSA Indicator of Quality Rating
1 2 3 4
available through development activities, grants,
foundations, and other partnerships.
4.13 – 4.15: Indicators for faith-based schools6
These Indicators are not applicable to our school.
MSA Indicator of Quality Rating
1 2 3 4
4.13 The governance provides financial resources
necessary to support and enhance the religious
nature of the school.
X
4.14 The governance makes judicious use of financial
resources based on the religious values of the
school.
X
4.15 Institutional advancement efforts are supported
by the governance, leadership, staff, parents, and
alumni.
X
B.1. Stakeholders’ comments to support the ratings:
Involvement of stakeholders regarding allocation or use of resources should be
increased.
B.2. Evidence:
Indicator
No. Evidence
N/A A rating of 1 or 2 was not received in any of the indicators of quality.
6 The use of the Faith-Based Indicators for this and the other Standards for Accreditation by faith-based
schools is voluntary and not required, unless their use is directed by the head of a parent school system
such as a Diocesan/Archdiocesan or a similar system of schools. The Faith-Based Indicators allow faith-
based schools, if they desire, to include in their self-study and accreditation process Indicators of Quality
that address unique characteristics of and expectations for schools whose mission and educational
program are defined wholly or in part by their particular faith.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 72
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
C. Self-Assessment of Adherence to the Standard for Accreditation
X Our self-assessment is that our school MEETS this Standard for Accreditation
Our self-assessment is that our school DOES NOT MEET this Standard for
Accreditation for the following reason(s):
D. Root Cause Analysis
Foundational Issue: Finances
Are there finances standard
indicators not met or in need of
improvement that inhibit the
attainment of the organizational
capacity objective?
YES
X NO
Data to support your conclusion:
Survey monkey results showed that all
indicators were met.
Hypothesis derived from your
conclusion:
If Saint Joseph School Community continues
to address financial needs as they arise, then
the school will be able to make improvements
as needed.
E. Implications for Planning
E.1. List the school’s significant strengths in meeting the Finances Standard.
Process of delinquent tuition has improved significantly.
Finances are currently stable and projections indicate continued stability.
Enrolling families are informed in advance of all financial obligations for
attending school.
The school has written, reasonable and equitable tuition, collection and refund
policies.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 73
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
E.2. List the school’s significant areas in need of improvement in meeting the
Finances Standard.
A true per pupil cost needs to be ascertained:
o Total school expenses do not include technology. At this time, the Home
and School Association is funding most technological expenditures. These
expenditures are currently being transferred to the school to allow the
Home and School Association to fund more traditional items.
o Per pupil cost for Pre-K greatly depends on the number of students
enrolled and will vary. Salary and benefits base for teacher/teacher aides
is divided by the number of students in the program. At this time, this
salary and benefits for teachers and teacher aides are included in the
expenses for K – 8.
A physical building evaluation needs to be completed.
E.3. Based on the strengths and areas for improvement identified, list any
important next steps or strategic priorities related to Finances that should be
included in the action plan in the Plan for Growth and Improvement.
Technological infrastructure wiring needs to be completed.
Purchase of iPads and related accessories need to be finalized.
Purchase of new Data Server (M Drive).
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 74
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
F. Evidence to Support the Assessment of This Standard
Evidence School
Current operating budget (for main campus and each branch campus) X
Certified external audit letter conducted within the last two years (for main
campus and each branch) X
Student tuition and fee schedule (if applicable) X
Long-range financial plan X
Schedule of student tuition and fees (for non-public and proprietary
institutions) X
Evidence that the institution has no contingent liabilities or on-going
litigations that potentially could affect the institution’s ability to continue
operation
X
List of grants and other funding sources obtained in the last calendar year X
Publications provided to students outlining students’ financial obligations X
Summary of the institution’s insurance coverage (for main campus and
each branch) X
Policies related to finances, financial aid, and refunds X
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 75
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
FACILITIES STANDARD FOR ACCREDITATION
A. Issues Related To This Standard
The following requirements ask the school to provide a self-assessment of expectations
for quality included in this Standard for Accreditation. The information and data
requested in this section are not for evaluation purposes. Instead, the information and
data assist the school in making the determination whether it meets the Standard and
its Indicators of Quality.
A.1. PHYSICAL FACILITIES.
Facility Location Year
Constructed
Most Recent
Renovation Ownership
School building Downingtown,
PA 1986
X Owned
Leased
Junior High wing
of school
building
Downingtown,
PA 1998
X Owned
Leased
Gymnasium Downingtown,
PA 1999
X Owned
Leased
Science Lab Downingtown,
PA 2010
X Owned
Leased
Library, Prep
Office, Honors
Math
Downingtown,
PA 2011
X Owned
Leased
Parish Meeting
Center
Downingtown,
PA 1998 2014
X Owned
Leased
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 76
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
A.2. ADEQUACY OF FACILITIES.
BUILDINGS
Satisfactory Needs
Improvement Unsatisfactory
Not
Applicable
Saint Joseph School X
Saint Joseph Parish
Meeting Center
X
Saint Joseph Church X
IHM Convent at Saint
Joseph
X
Saint Joseph Rectory X
Saint Joseph Parish
Offices
X
RESIDENTIAL
FACILITIES Satisfactory
Needs
Improvement Unsatisfactory
Not
Applicable
Dormitories X
Sleeping rooms X
Common areas X
Dining areas X
Bathrooms X
Recreational areas X
Heating X
Lighting X
Ventilation X
Provisions for the
disabled (ADA) X
Cleanliness X
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 77
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
A.3. MAINTENANCE AND CLEANING STAFF:
Type of Facilities Personnel Number Adequacy of Type and Number
Maintenance 1
X Satisfactory
Needs Improvement
Unsatisfactory
Grounds
Outside
Contractor/
Lawn
Maintenance
X Satisfactory
Needs Improvement
Unsatisfactory
Other: Gym
X Satisfactory
Needs Improvement
Unsatisfactory
A.4. CONDITION OF FACILITIES.
Facility Satisfactory Needs
Improvement Unsatisfactory
Not
Applicable
School Building(s) X
Furnishings X
Provisions for the
Disabled X
Variety of Instructional
Spaces X
Laboratories X
Counseling/Guidance
Space(s) X
Health Services Space(s) X
Library/Learning Media
Center X
Administrative and
Support Spaces X
Offices and Planning
Spaces for the Faculty X
Heating, Ventilation, Air
Conditioning X
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 78
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
Facility Satisfactory Needs
Improvement Unsatisfactory
Not
Applicable
Electrical, Water, and
Sanitation Systems X
Energy Conservation
System X
Security System X
Storage Spaces X
Parking Spaces X
Athletic Fields X
Indoor Athletic Space(s) X
Cafeteria/Dining Space(s) X
Auditorium/Theater X
Dormitories X
A.4.a. Provide a description of proposed improvements and/or corrective actions that
need to be taken if a rating of “Needs Improvement” or “Unsatisfactory” is
assigned. Include a description of actions that have been initiated or are
formally planned.
Currently, the faculty lounge/lunchroom is the only available space to work if the
classroom is in use for foreign language classes. A quiet planning space, with
Wi-Fi and phones to call parents for conferences, should be made available.
Spanish teacher needs dedicated office space.
Storage space is very limited. Every teacher should be assigned space in the
closet for their use.
On the upper floor, there is only one bathroom to accommodate over 25 staff
members. Two more bathrooms need to be provided: one by the CCIU wing and
another in the same vicinity of the current restroom.
There is not enough space within the school for the band to practice.
Continued improvements are necessary in faculty room to accommodate
overlapping of lunches.
Current configuration of faculty room needs to be addressed.
Currently there is no air conditioning within the majority of the rooms in the
school. Excessive heat in classrooms is unhealthy for teachers and students.
Portable air conditioning units or fans that draw hot air from rooms needs to be
installed
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 79
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
A.5. ADEQUACY AND QUALITY OF MAINTENANCE/CLEANING.
Facility Satisfactory Needs
Improvement Unsatisfactory
Not
Applicable
School Building(s) X
Furnishings X
Provisions for the
Disabled X
Instructional Spaces X
Laboratories X
Counseling/Guidance
Space(s) X
Health Services Space(s) X
Library/Learning Media
Center X
Administrative and
Support Spaces X
Offices and Planning
Spaces for the Faculty X
Heating, Ventilation, Air
Conditioning X
Electrical, Water, and
Sanitation Systems X
Energy Conservation
System X
Security System X
Storage Spaces X
Parking Spaces X
Athletic Fields X
Indoor Athletic Space(s) X
Cafeteria/Dining Space(s) X
Auditorium/Theater X
Dormitories X
Chapel X
Other: Bathrooms X
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 80
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
A.5.a. Provide a description of proposed improvements and/or corrective actions that
need to be taken if a rating of “Needs Improvement” or “Unsatisfactory” is
assigned. Include a description of actions that have been initiated or are
formally planned.
Heating in some of the rooms, particularly in the second floor newer wing, is
either too hot or too cold in winter, and too hot in warm weather.
Knowledgeable HVAC personnel to evaluate system on a cold day and warm
day to adjust or replace heating unit in rooms. Air conditioning or powerful fans
should be provided to cool temperatures in rooms.
Increase the number of bathrooms for faculty on the second floor. There are 25
people or more using 1 restroom. Additional facilities need to be installed by the
CCIU wing and 2 more by the current bathroom area
Dining area for teachers is cramped. Although the new chairs are comfortable,
they take up a lot of space and provide less seating especially when lunch times
overlap three days a week. Incoming teachers need to use the restroom facilities
and so do the outgoing teachers. Staff members are making copies during lunch
periods; therefore copy machine needs to be relocated.
The areas listed above are those in need of improvement.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 81
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
B. Self-Assessment of Adherence to the Indicators of Quality
The school must meet this Standard for Accreditation to be granted “Accreditation” by
the Middle States Association. The Indicators of Quality for the Standard identify the
types of evidence that, when taken together, indicate whether the school meets the
Standard. The school may indicate other types of evidence particular to the school in the
“Other” section provided below. Rate the degree to which the school meets each
Indicator by using the following scale:
Rating of Adherence to the Indicator
1. Does Not Meet The evidence indicates the school system does not meet
the expectations of this Indicator
2. Partially Meets/In
Need of Improvement
The evidence indicates that the school system partially
meets the expectations of this Indicator and is in need of
improvement
3. Meets The evidence indicates the school system meets the
expectations of this Indicator
4. Exceeds The evidence indicates the school system exceeds the
expectations of this Indicator
Middle States Association Accreditation Standard 5:
Facilities
The Standard: School facilities are safe, clean, and well maintained. The physical
environment supports delivery of the educational program/services as well as optimal
student development and achievement. Facilities are appropriate and adequate to
implement the philosophy/mission of the school. They are regularly inspected for
effective operation and meet all applicable laws including health and safety code
requirements.
5.1 – 5.6: Indicators for all schools
MSA Indicator of Quality Rating
1 2 3 4
5.1 The school’s facilities and equipment are
appropriate for achieving its philosophy/mission
and are healthy, safe, and well maintained.
X
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 82
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
MSA Indicator of Quality Rating
1 2 3 4
5.2 The school plans for, funds, and schedules regular
preventative measures, repairs, and maintenance
of its facilities and equipment.
X
5.3.a The facilities offer a variety of spaces for
providing quality programs and services for all
segments of the school’s population and include
appropriate accommodation for instruction;
X
5.3.b The facilities offer a variety of spaces for
providing quality programs and services for all
segments of the school’s population and include
appropriate accommodation for instruction;
X
5.3.c The facilities offer a variety of spaces for
providing quality programs and services for all
segments of the school’s population and include
appropriate accommodation for administration;
X
5.3.d The facilities offer a variety of spaces for
providing quality programs and services for all
segments of the school’s population and include
appropriate accommodation for: conferences;
X
5.3.e The facilities offer a variety of spaces for
providing quality programs and services for all
segments of the school’s population and include
appropriate accommodation for student activities;
X
5.3.f The facilities offer a variety of spaces for
providing quality programs and services for all
segments of the school’s population and include
appropriate accommodation for storage of school
property; and
X
5.3.g The facilities offer a variety of spaces for
providing quality programs and services for all
segments of the school’s population and include
appropriate accommodation for storage for
student belongings.
X
5.4 Sufficient systems are in place to monitor and
adjust air quality to appropriate levels. X
5.5 Lighting is adequate and appropriate in student
and staff areas. X
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 83
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
MSA Indicator of Quality Rating
1 2 3 4
5.6 Sufficient space is available for ingress, egress,
and traffic flow within the facilities. X
B.1. Stakeholders’ comments to support the ratings:
There are too many staff members who need to use the restroom between classes,
with only three restrooms are available. These restrooms are not centrally located.
There is only one restroom is on the second floor for 25 staff members. , The
additional two restrooms are located within the teacher’s room which is far from all
classrooms. Additional facilities are needed on the second floor, by the CCIU wing
and by the current restroom by central stairwell.
The air temperature is extreme, being either too hot or too cold.
B.2. Evidence:
Indicator
No. Evidence
N/A A rating of 1 or 2 was not received in any of the indicators of quality.
C. Self-Assessment of Adherence to the Standard for Accreditation
X Our self-assessment is that our school MEETS this Standard for Accreditation
Our self-assessment is that our school DOES NOT MEET this Standard for
Accreditation for the following reason(s):
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 84
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
D. Root Cause Analysis
Foundational Issue: Facilities
Are there facilities standard
indicators not met or in need of
improvement that inhibit the
attainment of the organizational
capacity objective?
YES
X NO
Data to support your conclusion:
Stakeholders’ feedback and surveys provided
the data for this standard.
Hypothesis derived from your
conclusion:
Overall facilities are safe, clean and adequately
maintained.
E. Implications for Planning
E.1. List the school’s significant strengths in meeting the Facilities Standard.
The school is clean and maintained.
There is adequate room for the number of students.
Repairs are completed in a timely manner.
E.2. List the school’s significant areas in need of improvement in meeting the
Facilities Standard.
Improvement is needed to better regulate the air temperature during the hot and
cold months.
Additional faculty restrooms are needed.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 85
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
E.3. Based on the strengths and areas for improvement identified, list any
important next steps or strategic priorities related to Facilities that should be
included in the action plan in the Plan for Growth and Improvement.
As of today there are no proposed improvements.
A study should be conducted to determine the air quality and improvement
made.
Money should be appropriated for the air conditioners in the upper floor
classrooms.
Money should be appropriated for the upstairs restrooms.
F. Evidence to Support the Assessment of This Standard
Evidence School
Floor plan of facilities X
Long-range facilities plan X
Maintenance/repair schedules X
Plans for any facilities improvements X
Policies related to facilities X
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 86
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
SCHOOL CLIMATE AND ORGANIZATION STANDARD
FOR ACCREDITATION
A. Self-Assessment of Adherence to the Indicators of Quality
The school must meet this Standard for Accreditation to be granted “Accreditation” by
the Middle States Association. The Indicators of Quality for the Standard identify the
types of evidence that, when taken together, indicate whether the school meets the
Standard. The school may indicate other types of evidence particular to the school in the
“Other” section provided below. Rate the degree to which the school meets each
Indicator by using the following scale:
Rating of Adherence to the Indicator
1. Does Not Meet The evidence indicates the school system does not meet
the expectations of this Indicator
2. Partially Meets/In
Need of Improvement
The evidence indicates that the school system partially
meets the expectations of this Indicator and is in need of
improvement
3. Meets The evidence indicates the school system meets the
expectations of this Indicator
4. Exceeds The evidence indicates the school system exceeds the
expectations of this Indicator
Middle States Association Accreditation Standard 6:
School Climate and Organization
The Standard: The school’s organizational structure and climate facilitate
achievement of its core values as expressed in the philosophy/mission. The school
culture supports successful implementation of age- and developmentally appropriate
educational programs and services. Roles, responsibilities, expectations, and reporting
relationships are clearly defined. Administrative, instructional, and support staff are
qualified, competent, and sufficient in number to effectively provide quality
educational experiences. The school regularly conducts staff performance appraisals
and offers professional development opportunities informed by its philosophy/mission.
Relationships among the staff and leadership are collegial and collaborative.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 87
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
6.1 – 6.19: Indicators for all schools
MSA Indicator of Quality Rating
1 2 3 4
6.1 The school’s design, organization, climate, and
leadership support attainment of the school’s
philosophy/mission.
X
6.2 Designated, qualified leadership provides
coordination, supervision, and direction for the
educational program, student services, and
student activities.
X
6.3 A logical and clear table of organization for the
school includes written job descriptions that
specify levels of responsibility and reporting
relationships.
X
6.4 Administrative, instructional, and support staffs
are qualified, competent, and sufficient in number
to meet the needs of the total educational
program, student services, and student activities.
X
6.5 Staff members, including administrators, are
assigned to work based on their education,
preparation, experience, expertise, and
commitment to the school’s success.
X
6.6 The school implements written personnel policies
and procedures for the operation of the school and
makes them available to all employees.
X
6.7 The school implements written policies and
procedures for determining adequate
compensation, arriving at reasonable workloads
and acceptable working conditions, and defining
just and fair treatment for all staff.
X
6.8 The school implements written policies and
procedures for evaluating staff performance.
Performance appraisals are conducted with the
knowledge of the staff member and reported in
writing as well as verbally. Results are used to
make professional development
recommendations. Staff members have an
X
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 88
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
MSA Indicator of Quality Rating
1 2 3 4
opportunity to discuss and appeal their
appraisals.
6.9 Staff members are provided opportunities to offer
input into the content of their professional
development programs.
X
6.10 The school implements written policies and
procedures for handling complaints/grievances by
members of the staff.
X
6.11 The school implements written policies and
procedures for orienting and mentoring new staff
members.
X
6.12 The school implements written policies and
procedures to ensure that service providers not
employed by the school are appropriately
oriented, supervised, and supported.
X
6.13 The working environment for the staff promotes
collegiality, high expectations, trust, support, and
recognition for accomplishments and
contributions.
X
6.14 Professional satisfaction and good general morale
characterize the school’s staff. X
6.15 Staff members are committed to the school,
dedicated to their work, and take pride in the
outcome of their efforts.
X
6.16 The leadership encourages staff members’
affiliation with professional organizations. X
6.17 The school’s families and community demonstrate
commitment to, pride in, and support for the
school through participation, promotion of its
mission, and financial support.
X
6.18 Members of the staff, students, and their families
feel safe in the school.
X
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 89
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
MSA Indicator of Quality Rating
1 2 3 4
6.19 A clearly defined, written code of student conduct
supports an environment that is conducive to
learning and is understood by students, staff, and
families. The code is enforced fairly and
uniformly.
X
6.20 - 6.28: Indicators for schools that are part of a public school district,
archdiocesan/diocesan system, corporation, or other school
organization with a central office staff
These Indicators are not applicable to our school.
MSA Indicator of Quality Rating
1 2 3 4
6.20 A logical and clearly understood table of
organization exists for the system of schools with
written job descriptions that specify levels of
responsibility and reporting relationships.
X
6.21 The design, organization, and climate of the
system of schools support attainment of the
school’s philosophy/mission.
X
6.22 Administrative, instructional, and support staffs
of the central office are qualified, competent, and
sufficient in number to meet the needs of the total
educational program, student services, and
student activities.
X
6.23 Central office staff members possess the
qualifications of education, preparation,
experience, and commitment that contribute to the
school’s success. Staff members are assigned to
work by reason of their training and expertise.
X
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 90
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
MSA Indicator of Quality Rating
1 2 3 4
6.24 The central office’s leadership and staff work
cooperatively to create a climate for teaching and
learning that fosters the attainment of the school’s
philosophy/mission.
X
6.25 The organization implements written personnel
policies and procedures for the operation of the
system of schools and makes them available to all
employees.
X
6.26 The organization implements written policies and
procedures for determining adequate
compensation, arriving at reasonable workloads
and acceptable working conditions, and defining
just and fair treatment.
X
6.27 Central office leadership supports a
comprehensive program of professional
development for all members of the staff that
addresses system-wide learning expectations and
specific student needs by allocating appropriate
time and resources.
X
6.28 Central office leadership encourages the school
staff members’ affiliation with professional
organizations.
X
6.29 – 6.31: Indicators for schools with early age programs
X These Indicators are not applicable to our school.
6.32: Indicator for schools that provide distance education
X This Indicator is not applicable to our school.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 91
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
6.33 – 6.43: Indicators faith-based schools7
These Indicators are not applicable to our school.
MSA Indicator of Quality Rating
1 2 3 4
6.33 The school’s environment portrays an identifiable
integration of faith, life, and culture. X
6.34 Programs of study, activities, athletics, codes of
conduct, and discipline actions reflect the
religious values expressed in the school’s
foundational documents.
X
6.35 Appropriate attention is given in all school
programs and activities to values and traditions
that demonstrate and reinforce the school’s
religious nature.
X
6.36 The faculty is provided with opportunities to
advance its understanding of the religious beliefs
and foundational documents of the school.
X
6.37 The school provides formal and informal
opportunities for the spiritual development of the
faculty and staff members.
X
6.38 Professional development opportunities regularly
provide for the spiritual development of the
faculty and staff as spiritual leaders in the school
community.
X
6.39 The religious studies program for students is well
defined and consistent with the mission of the
school and the sponsoring institution.
X
6.40 Prayer and/or expressions of faith are integral
components of the school’s curriculum and daily
activities.
X
7 The use of the Faith-Based Indicators for this and the other Standards for Accreditation by faith-based
schools is voluntary and not required, unless their use is directed by the head of a parent school system
such as a Diocesan/Archdiocesan or a similar system of schools. The Faith-Based Indicators allow faith-
based schools, if they desire, to include in their self-study and accreditation process Indicators of Quality
that address unique characteristics of and expectations for schools whose mission and educational
program are defined wholly or in part by their particular faith.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 92
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
MSA Indicator of Quality Rating
1 2 3 4
6.41 Students play an appropriate role in planning,
organizing and conducting the school’s faith-
based experiences.
X
6.42 Criteria for hiring school personnel include an
assessment of the candidates’ understanding and
commitment to the foundational beliefs and
mission of the school.
X
6.43 The criteria for performance evaluations of the
faculty and staff members include understanding
and commitment to the mission and beliefs of the
school.
X
6.44 – 6.46: Indicators for all Pennsylvania public, independent, and faith-
based schools
These Indicators are not applicable to our school.
MSA Indicator of Quality Rating
1 2 3 4
6.44 The school has and implements a written policy
that requires all applicants for employment with
the school, including employees of independent
contractors but excluding employees who do not
have direct contact with students, to undergo the
following background checks prior to being hired
or contracted:
a. Pennsylvania State Police Request for Criminal
Records Check;
b. PA Department of Public Welfare Child Abuse
X
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 93
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
MSA Indicator of Quality Rating
1 2 3 4
History Clearance; and
c. Federal Criminal History Record Information
(CHRI) from a FBI fingerprint-based background
check.8
6.45 The school has and implements a written policy
that requires the school to review applicants’
required background check reports prior to their
being hired or contracted to determine the fitness
of the individual to work in a position in which
s/he will have contact with children.
X
6.46 The school has and implements a policy that
requires the school to keep on file copies of the
required background check reports for all staff
hired or contracted on or after April 1, 2007.9
X
A.1. Stakeholders’ comments to support the ratings:
Job description for existing staff and new staff is unavailable.
There is some feeling of a negative and apathetic atmosphere.
A.2. Evidence:
Indicator
No. Evidence
N/A A rating of 1 or 2 was not received in any of the indicators of quality.
8 Act 114 of 2006 (state law) specifies that all applicants for employment with public and private schools
including employees of independent contractors, but excluding employees who do not have direct
contact with students undergo background checks noted in Indicator 6.11. In addition, Act 114 extended
the background check requirements to include student teacher candidates prior to their field experience.
Student teacher background check reports are to be submitted to their higher education administrator.
9 Act 114 of 2006 and the PA Public School Code, Section 1-111 requires public and private schools to keep
a copy of each background check report for each staff person hired on or after April 1, 2007 for the
duration of time the individual is employed by that school. This also applies to school contractors.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 94
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
B. Self-Assessment of Adherence to the Standard for Accreditation
X Our self-assessment is that our school MEETS this Standard for Accreditation
Our self-assessment is that our school DOES NOT MEET this Standard for
Accreditation for the following reason(s):
C. Root Cause Analysis
Foundational Issue: School Climate and Organization
Are there school climate and
organization standard indicators
not met or in need of improvement
that inhibit the attainment of the
organizational capacity objective?
YES
X NO
Data to support your conclusion:
Stakeholders’ feedback and surveys provided
data for the standard.
Hypothesis derived from your
conclusion:
Saint Joseph School meets the School Climate
and Organization Standard for accreditation
by the Middle States Association
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 95
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
D. Implications for Planning
D.1. List the school’s significant strengths in meeting the School Climate and
Organization Standard.
Parents and students feel that the faculty and staff are committed to the school
and show dedication to their work.
The school’s families and community demonstrate commitment to, pride in, and
support for the school through participation, promotion of its mission, and
financial support.
Members of the staff, students, and their families feel safe in the school.
The school maintains and implements a written policy that requires all
applicants for employment within the school to comply with all state and federal
background checks prior to being hired: Pennsylvania State Police Request for
Criminal Records Check, PA Department of Public Welfare Child Abuse History
Clearance, Federal Criminal History Record Information from FBI fingerprint-
based background check.
The school’s religious identity can be seen in the school’s educational program,
services, activities, and curriculum.
D.2. List the school’s significant areas in need of improvement in meeting the
School Climate and Organization Standard.
A logical and clear table of organization for the school in order to provide
written job descriptions that specifies levels of responsibility.
Written policies and procedures for orienting and mentoring new staff members
are needed.
Ways to strengthen professional satisfaction and general morale among the
school’s staff are needed.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 96
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
D.3. Based on the strengths and areas for improvement identified, list any
important next steps or strategic priorities related to School Climate and
Organization that should be included in the action plan in the Plan for Growth
and Improvement.
Documents should be created that provide job descriptions and policies and
onboarding procedures for new staff members.
Provide social and professional opportunities to create more interaction amongst
the faculty and staff.
E. Evidence to Support the Assessment of This Standard
Evidence School
Organizational chart for the school and school system X
Floor plan of facilities X
Salary schedules and descriptions of benefits packages for teachers,
specialists, and support staff X
Contracts (e.g. union, collective bargaining agreements) X
Results of any climate survey X
Instruments used for evaluating the performance of the staff X
Professional development plan X
Policies related to school climate and organization X
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 97
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
HEALTH AND SAFETY STANDARD FOR ACCREDITATION
A. Issues Related To This Standard
The following requirements ask the school to provide a self-assessment of expectations
for quality included in this Standard for Accreditation. The information and data
requested in this section are not for evaluation purposes. Instead, the information and
data assist the school in making the determination whether it meets the Standard and
its Indicators of Quality.
A.1. EMERGENCY AND CRISIS PLANS:
Type of Emergency/Crisis Plan Effectiveness of
Plans
S NI U
An Internal Lockdown X
An External Lockdown X
A Medical Emergency X
An Assault
An Evacuation X
A Fire X
A Shelter in Place and Evacuation X
A.1.a. Provide a description of proposed improvements and/or corrective actions that
need to be taken if a rating of “Needs Improvement” or “Unsatisfactory” is
assigned. Include a description of actions that have been initiated or are
formally planned.
We have formed a Crisis Management Committee.
The Archdiocese of Philadelphia is updating their Crisis Management Program.
Administration and staff met with the local police department and plan to meet
with the three area schools in close proximity regarding evacuation plans.
Need to purchase supplies for Sheltering in Place: flashlights, walkie-talkies,
window shades, duct tape, water and food.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 98
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
A.2. EMERGENCY DRILLS:
Type of Emergency Drill Frequency of
Drills Quality of Drills
S NI U
Fire
Semi-Monthly
X Monthly X
Annually
Shelter in Place (Natural Disaster,
Flooding, Severe Weather, etc.)
Semi-Monthly
Monthly
X Annually X
Evacuation (Bomb Threat, etc.)
Semi-Monthly
Monthly
X Annually X
External Threat
Semi-Monthly
Monthly
X Annually X
Internal Threat
Semi-Monthly
Monthly
X Annually X
Bus Evacuation - Mandated by the
state
Semi-Monthly
Monthly
X Semi-
Annually X
A.2.a. Provide a description of proposed improvements and/or corrective actions that
need to be taken if a rating of “Needs Improvement” or “Unsatisfactory” is
assigned. Include a description of actions that have been initiated or are
formally planned.
We have formed a Crisis Management Committee.
The Archdiocese of Philadelphia is updating their Crisis Management Program
We have met with the local police department and plan to meet with the three
area schools regarding evacuation plans.
Beginning April 2014, the Crisis Management Committee has been meeting
periodically with Chrissy DePaolantonio, Chester County Safe Schools Planning
Coordinator, to create a School Safety Plan.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 99
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
A.3. HEALTH AND SAFETY INSPECTION SCHEDULE:
Type of Inspection Frequency
Results of
Inspections
S NI U
Fire Alarm System
Semi-Monthly
Monthly
X Annually X
Food Services
Semi-Monthly
Monthly
X Semi-
Annually X
Elevator
Semi-Monthly
X Monthly X
Annually
Internal Communications System
(NA - the system has not inspected)
Semi-Monthly
Monthly
Annually
Technology Arts/Industrial Arts
Equipment
Semi-Monthly
X Monthly X
Annually
Athletic Equipment
Semi-Monthly
Monthly
X Annually X
Playground Equipment
Semi-Monthly
Monthly
X Annually X
Water Supply
Semi-Monthly
Monthly
X Annually X
Swimming Pool Water N/A
Semi-Monthly
Monthly
Annually
Other: Pest Control
Semi-Monthly
X Monthly X
Annually
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 100
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
A.3.a. Provide a description of proposed improvements and/or corrective actions that
need to be taken if a rating of “Needs Improvement” or “Unsatisfactory” is
assigned. Include a description of actions that have been initiated or are
formally planned.
While the Internal Communication System works effectively every day, it has not
been formally tested.
A.4. SUMMARY OF HEALTH SCREENINGS:
Screening For Conducted By
Frequency
Vision Downingtown School District
Nurse: Roberta Aldrich, RN
Semi-
Monthly
Monthly
X Annually
Hearing Downingtown School District
Nurse: Roberta Aldrich, RN
Semi-
Monthly
Monthly
X Annually
Dental Downingtown School District
Dental Hygienist: Ann Yeager
Semi-
Monthly
Monthly
X Annually
Physical Primary Care Physician for
grade K and grade 6.
Semi-
Monthly
Monthly
Annually
Tuberculosis N/A
Semi-
Monthly
Monthly
Annually
Other: Body Mass Index Downingtown School District
Nurse: Roberta Aldrich, RN
Semi-
Monthly
Monthly
X Annually
Other: Scoliosis Downingtown School District
Nurse: Roberta Aldrich, RN
Semi-
Monthly
Monthly
X Annually
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 101
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
A.5. SUMMARY OF INNOCULATIONS:
Inoculation For In Grade Level
4 Doses or more Diphtheria and Tetanus Kindergarten
3 Doses or more Polio Kindergarten
2 Doses Measles, Mumps, and Rubella Kindergarten
3 Doses Hepatitis B Kindergarten
2 Doses Varicella Kindergarten
Tdap and Meningococcal 7th Grade
A.6. PROVISIONS FOR HEALTH AND SAFETY:
Health and Safety Issue Quality and Adequacy
S NI U
Adequate health care services at all times. X
Health care at school functions that take place away
from the school’s premises. X
Means to communicate internally in event of power
failure of evacuation of building. X
Means to communicate externally in event of power
failure of evacuation of building. X
Place(s) to assemble during an evacuation X
Proper and safe storage of dangerous substances. X
Fire blankets and/or eye wash stations in required areas. X
Automatic external defibrillators available and staff
personnel trained to use them. X
Panic buttons for dangerous equipment. N/A
Provisions for preventing the spread of infectious
substances and diseases. X
Safety lines in required areas. X
Students and the staff wearing eye and ear protection in
dangerous areas. X
Fire extinguishers available in all areas. X
Fire alarm pull stations in all areas. X
Evacuation notice and directions posted in all rooms
and spaces. X
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 102
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
A.6.a. Provide a description of proposed improvements and/or corrective actions that
need to be taken if a rating of “Needs Improvement” or “Unsatisfactory” is
assigned. Include a description of actions that have been initiated or are
formally planned.
According to survey results, there are no improvements or corrective actions that
need to be taken.
A.7. HEALTH AND SAFETY STAFF:
Type of Health and Safety Personnel Number Quality and Adequacy
S NI U
Certified Nurse 2 X
Local Police Security Officer * 1 X
*A police officer from Downingtown walks through school almost daily. He/she might
walk through or park to observe arrival or dismissal.
B. Self-Assessment of Adherence to the Indicators of Quality
The school must meet this Standard for Accreditation to be granted “Accreditation” by
the Middle States Association. The Indicators of Quality for the Standard identify the
types of evidence that, when taken together, indicate whether the school meets the
Standard. The school may indicate other types of evidence particular to the school in the
“Other” section provided below. Rate the degree to which the school meets each
Indicator by using the following scale:
Rating of Adherence to the Indicator
1. Does Not Meet The evidence indicates the school system does not meet
the expectations of this Indicator
2. Partially Meets/In
Need of Improvement
The evidence indicates that the school system partially
meets the expectations of this Indicator and is in need of
improvement
3. Meets The evidence indicates the school system meets the
expectations of this Indicator
4. Exceeds The evidence indicates the school system exceeds the
expectations of this Indicator
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 103
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
Middle States Association Accreditation Standard 7:
Health and Safety
The Standard: A safe, orderly, and healthy environment for teaching and learning is
provided. The school adheres to local, state, and federal government health and safety
requirements. Health, safety, preventive/emergency procedures, and crisis management
policies are clearly written, well documented, implemented, and updated regularly.
7.1 – 7.15: Indicators for all schools
MSA Indicator of Quality Rating
1 2 3 4
7.1 The school has satisfactory written procedures and
functional equipment with which to communicate
during fire and other emergencies, to summon
assistance, and to evacuate the school’s facilities.
X
7.2 The school provides adequate health care at
school functions that take place away from the
school’s premises.
X
7.3 Appropriate training is provided for all staff
members on how to implement emergency and
crisis plans, handle accidents and illnesses, and
prevent the spread of infectious diseases.
X
7.4 The school appropriately manages the storage and
administration of student medications. X
7.5 The school safely stores equipment and supplies. X
7.6 A system exists to account for the whereabouts of
students at all times. X
7.7 The school maintains comprehensive, current
health records for all students and staff. X
7.8 The school conducts and maintains written
records of regular emergency drills. X
7.9 Designated members of the staff inform faculty
and families (as appropriate to maintain
confidentiality) about students’ health or physical
needs.
X
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 104
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
MSA Indicator of Quality Rating
1 2 3 4
7.10 The school ensures that the staff is kept up–to-
date on relevant health, wellness, and safety
information and practices, including procedures
to deal with individual student needs.
X
7.11 Working relationships with local authorities and
health service providers are positive and ongoing. X
7.12 The educational program includes opportunities
for students to develop knowledge, attitudes, and
practices necessary for personal wellness and a
healthy lifestyle.
X
7.13 The school has an effective system to control access
to the school by visitors and other non-school
personnel.
X
7.14 Staff members model positive health and safety
practices. X
7.15 Safe drinking water is available throughout the
day for the staff and students. X
7.16: Indicator for schools with early age programs
X These Indicators are not applicable to our school.
B.1. Stakeholders’ comments to support the ratings:
Emergency procedures exist and recent updates are in the procress of being
implemented due to the change in the school campus.
More emergency drills and crisis management training are needed.
A system is needed to account for the whereabouts of students at all times.
Clearly defined guidelines for what can legally be communicated regarding student
health needs to faculty (HIPPA Laws) are needed.
There should be more integration of health and fitness education into the curriculum
of every grade level.
More educational training is needed for staff to improve personal wellness.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 105
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
B.2. Evidence:
Indicator
No. Evidence
7.15 School water was tested by the Downingtown Health Department
(January 15, 2014).
7.15 School water supply was reported safe for drinking and the results were
communicated to parents (January 16, 2014).
C. Self-Assessment of Adherence to the Standard for Accreditation
X Our self-assessment is that our school MEETS this Standard for Accreditation
Our self-assessment is that our school DOES NOT MEET this Standard for
Accreditation for the following reason(s):
D. Root Cause Analysis
Foundational Issue: Health and Safety
Are there health and safety
standard indicators not met or in
need of improvement that inhibit
the attainment of the
organizational capacity objective?
YES
X NO
Data to support your conclusion:
Stakeholders’ feedback and surveys provided
the data for this Standard.
Hypothesis derived from your
conclusion:
Health and Safety Standards are met.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 106
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
E. Implications for Planning E.1. List the school’s significant strengths in meeting the Health and Safety
Standard.
The Principal and staff are committed to improving the frequency and quality of
crisis management drills.
In March 2014, a Crisis Management Committee was formed.
There is daily police presence, both inside and outside of the school, to ensure
and promote safety.
E.2. List the school’s significant areas in need of improvement in meeting the
Health and Safety Standard.
More emergency drills are needed.
E.3. Based on the strengths and areas for improvement identified, list any
important next steps or strategic priorities related to Health and Safety that
should be included in the action plan in the Plan for Growth and
Improvement.
The March 2014 formation of a Crisis Management Committee to oversee drills
and training, and adherence to state, local and archdiocesan regulations
F. Evidence to Support the Assessment of This Standard
Evidence School
Emergency and crisis plans X
Records of most recent health and safety inspections X
Record of emergency drills X
Emergency Procedures section of Faculty Handbook X
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 107
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
EDUCATIONAL PROGRAM STANDARD FOR
ACCREDITATION
A. Issues Related To This Standard
The following requirements ask the school to provide a self-assessment of expectations
for quality included in this Standard for Accreditation. The information and data
requested in this section are not for evaluation purposes. Instead, the information and
data assist the school in making the determination whether it meets the Standard and
its Indicators of Quality.
A.1. SUMMARY OF THE EDUCATIONAL PROGRAM:
X The instructional hours are reported for one academic week.
TOTAL NUMBER OF INSTRUCTIONAL HOURS PER WEEK
Grade
Level
English/
Language
Arts
Math
Science
Social
Studies
The Arts
Other:
Language
Health/
P.E.
Technology
Other:
Religion
Pre-K
K 150 75 60 60 120 75 75
1 900 225 45 45 90 45 30 150
2 900 225 45 45 90 45 30 150
3 750 225 150 150 90 45 45 175
4 750 225 150 150 90 45 45 175
5 460 275 220 215 110 45 55 55 220
6 460 275 220 215 110 45 55 55 220
7 460 275 220 215 110 45 55 55 220
8 460 275 220 215 110 45 55 55 220
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 108
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
B. Self-Assessment of Adherence to the Indicators of Quality
The school must meet this Standard for Accreditation to be granted “Accreditation” by
the Middle States Association. The Indicators of Quality for the Standard identify the
types of evidence that, when taken together, indicate whether the school meets the
Standard. The school may indicate other types of evidence particular to the school in the
“Other” section provided below. Rate the degree to which the school meets each
Indicator by using the following scale:
Rating of Adherence to the Indicator
1. Does Not Meet The evidence indicates the school system does not meet
the expectations of this Indicator
2. Partially Meets/In
Need of Improvement
The evidence indicates that the school system partially
meets the expectations of this Indicator and is in need of
improvement
3. Meets The evidence indicates the school system meets the
expectations of this Indicator
4. Exceeds The evidence indicates the school system exceeds the
expectations of this Indicator
Middle States Association Accreditation Standard:
Educational Program
The Standard: An effective educational program for a school consists of both
carefully planned and well executed curriculum programs and solid instructional
pedagogy. Also fundamental to a successful educational program are the means to
assess student performance and growth as well as programmatic evaluation. Thus,
curriculum, instruction, and assessment are often considered to be the “heart” of any
school since these three components have such an impact on the total school experience
of students. The curriculum outlines what students should know and be able to do.
Instruction identifies effective ways for teachers to ensure student learning takes place.
Assessment indicates at what level students are able to demonstrate knowledge, skills,
and attitudes.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 109
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
8.1 – 8.16: Indicators for all schools
MSA Indicator of Quality Rating
1 2 3 4
8.1 Written curriculum guides identify program
objectives and define the scope and sequence of
the educational program. The guides are
functional.
X
8.2 The educational program provides instruction in
the basic subject areas of language arts and
literature (including early language development
and literacy skills, speaking, writing, and listening
communication skills), mathematics, the sciences,
and social sciences.
X
8.3 The educational program includes experiences in
visual and performing arts, health, world
languages, and physical education.
X
8.4 The educational program provides experiences
that promote students’ critical thinking,
reasoning, problem-solving skills, and study
skills.
X
8.5 The educational program includes instruction in
effective uses of information technology and
provides opportunities for application.
X
8.6 A variety of group learning settings (e.g.,
individual, small group, large group) is provided
for students daily.
X
8.7 The educational program offers opportunities for
development of social skills—such as increasing
self-control and a sense of individual and group
responsibility—in interaction with adults and
peers.
X
8.8 Written curriculum and instruction policies and
procedures provide direction to the staff,
leadership, and other stakeholders in the
development, implementation, and improvement
of the educational program.
X
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 110
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
MSA Indicator of Quality Rating
1 2 3 4
8.9 Provision is made for both horizontal and vertical
articulation and coordination of the educational
program among all levels of the school.
X
8.10 An overview of the educational program, school
policies and procedures, and other pertinent
information is available in written form to
students and their parents.
X
8.11 The educational program defines desired student
outcomes as expressed in terms of student
understanding, knowledge, attitudes, skills, and
habits.
X
8.12 Course or program objectives are simply stated
and understandable to students. X
8.13 The educational program considers the ages,
cultures, and varying levels of ability of students. X
8.14 The instructional program is designed to meet
students’ needs in accordance with the school’s
philosophy/mission.
X
8.15 The educational program and its expectations for
learning are understood and supported by the
school’s stakeholders.
X
8.16 Curriculum development is a dynamic, emergent
process influenced by the attributes and interests
of the children, their families, and teachers.
X
8.17 – 8.23: Indicators for schools with early age programs
X These Indicators are not applicable to our school.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 111
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
8.24 – 8.25: Indicators for schools with elementary school programs
These Indicators are not applicable to our school.
MSA Indicator of Quality Rating
1 2 3 4
8.24 The educational program places emphasis on the
development of cognitive, psychomotor, and
affective skills, plus the knowledge and
competencies that establish the basis for greater
understanding.
X
8.25 The educational program provides experiences
that prepare students for successful transition to
middle and secondary school settings.
X
8.26 – 8.27: Indicators for schools with middle school programs
These Indicators are not applicable to our school.
MSA Indicator of Quality Rating
1 2 3 4
8.26 The educational program provides activities and
experiences that assist early adolescents in
identifying their aptitudes and interests, self-
directed decision-making, and building self-
worth.
X
8.27 The educational program provides experiences
that prepare students for successful, smooth
transitions from elementary school to middle
school and from the middle school to secondary
school.
X
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 112
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
8.28 – 8.31: Indicators for schools with secondary school programs
X These Indicators are not applicable to our school.
8.32 – 8.36: Indicators for schools that provide distance education
X These Indicators are not applicable to our school.
8.37 – 8.48: Indicators for faith-based schools10
These Indicators are not applicable to our school.
MSA Indicator of Quality Rating
1 2 3 4
8.37 The religious nature of the school is appropriately
reflected throughout the curriculum. X
8.38 The school teaches the faith of the sponsoring
institution in accordance with its official teachings
and traditions.
X
8.39 Religious education of the students is a priority in
scheduling, budgeting, and planning. X
8.40 The religious education of the students is a
concern of all faculty members. X
8.41 The religious dimension of all areas of the
curriculum is acknowledged. X
8.42 The school provides religious formation programs
for its faith-community members that are based
on the faith-community’s beliefs, values, and
traditions.
X
10
The use of the Faith-Based Indicators for this and the other Standards for Accreditation by faith-based
schools is voluntary and not required, unless their use is directed by the head of a parent school system
such as a Diocesan/Archdiocesan or a similar system of schools. The Faith-Based Indicators allow faith-
based schools, if they desire, to include in their self-study and accreditation process Indicators of Quality
that address unique characteristics of and expectations for schools whose mission and educational
program are defined wholly or in part by their particular faith.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 113
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
MSA Indicator of Quality Rating
1 2 3 4
8.43 The religious education program is
developmentally appropriate in nature. X
8.44 Religious social teachings are integrated
throughout the school’s educational program. X
8.45 The curriculum for the health education
program(s) is consistent with the teachings and
values of the religious beliefs on which the school
is founded.
X
8.46 Faith development and community service
programs for students have clearly defined
objectives reflecting the mission of the school.
X
8.47 Faith development and community service
programs are seen as integral components of the
school’s educational programs. X
8.48 Faith-based experiences that foster the religious
formation of the students are provided regularly. X
B.1. Stakeholders’ comments to support the ratings:
Health education is integrated into the curriculum across all grade levels.
Transition to middle school and its expectations need to be developed.
B.2. Evidence:
Indicator
No. Evidence
A rating of 1 or 2 was not received in any of the indicators of quality.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 114
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
C. Self-Assessment of Adherence to the Standard for Accreditation
X Our self-assessment is that our school MEETS this Standard for Accreditation
Our self-assessment is that our school DOES NOT MEET this Standard for
Accreditation for the following reason(s):
D. Root Cause Analysis
Foundational Issue: Educational Program
Are there educational program
standard indicators not met or in
need of improvement that inhibit
the attainment of the
organizational capacity objective?
YES
X NO
Data to support your conclusion:
Stakeholders’ feedback and surveys provided
the data for this standard.
Hypothesis derived from your
conclusion:
St. Joseph School strives to incorporate the
religious and academic curriculum of the
Archdiocese of Philadelphia.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 115
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
E. Implications for Planning
E.1. List the school’s significant strengths in meeting the Educational Program
Standard.
The educational program is aligned with the curriculum of the Archdiocese of
Philadelphia.
The Archdiocese of Philadelphia provides written curriculum guides which are
functional, available and in use.
The school policies and procedures are available in written form and provided to
families in the Saint Joseph School handbook and on the school website.
E.2. List the school’s significant areas in need of improvement in meeting the
Educational Program Standard.
The educational program needs to provide students with more opportunities for
critical thinking, reasoning, problem solving and development of study skills.
Collaborative learning needs to be more prominent in the educational program.
Resources are limited for supporting students who are not performing at grade
level and who require more academic support in the classroom.
E.3. Based on the strengths and areas for improvement identified, list any
important next steps or strategic priorities related to Educational Program that
should be included in the action plan in the Plan for Growth and
Improvement.
Provide children with projects/assignments that allow them to apply critical
thinking, problem solving and study skills.
Allow for more collaborative learning, flexible grouping and formal and informal
speaking opportunities.
More professional development opportunities should be provided to teachers
regarding special education, meeting the needs of their students and
implementing differentiated instruction.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 116
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
F. Evidence to Support the Assessment of this Standard
Evidence School
Program of studies or other overview of the components of the educational
program X
Scope and sequence charts X
Written curriculum guides for each component of the educational program X
Master schedule X
Policies related to educational program X
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 117
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
ASSESSMENT AND EVIDENCE OF STUDENT LEARNING
STANDARD FOR ACCREDITATION
A. Issues Related To This Standard
The following requirements ask the school to provide a self-assessment of expectations
for quality included in this Standard for Accreditation. The information and data
requested in this section are not for evaluation purposes. Instead, the information and
data assist the school in making the determination whether it meets the Standard and
its Indicators of Quality.
A.1. EVIDENCE OF STUDENT LEARNING:
Name of Assessment Grade Level(s)
Administered
Curricular
Area(s)
Assessed
Evaluation of Most
Recent Results
S NI U
Terra Nova K - 7 Reading X
K - 7 Mathematics X
3 - 7 Language X
1 - 7 Social Studies X
1 - 7 Science X
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 118
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
B. Self-Assessment to Adherence to the Indicators Of Quality
The school must meet this Standard for Accreditation to be granted “Accreditation” by
the Middle States Association. The Indicators of Quality for the Standard identify the
types of evidence that, when taken together, indicate whether the school meets the
Standard. The school may indicate other types of evidence particular to the school in the
“Other” section provided below. Rate the degree to which the school meets each
Indicator by using the following scale:
Rating of Adherence to the Indicator
1. Does Not Meet The evidence indicates the school system does not meet
the expectations of this Indicator
2. Partially Meets/In
Need of Improvement
The evidence indicates that the school system partially
meets the expectations of this Indicator and is in need of
improvement
3. Meets The evidence indicates the school system meets the
expectations of this Indicator
4. Exceeds The evidence indicates the school system exceeds the
expectations of this Indicator
Middle States Association Accreditation Standard 9:
Assessment and Evidence of Student Learning
The Standard: The school systematically collects and rigorously analyzes
quantifiable and observable evidence of individual learning and growth from multiple
valid and reliable sources. Evidence of student learning is used to evaluate and improve
curriculum effectiveness, instructional practices, professional development, and
support services. Progress in student learning and performance is expected and is
accurately, clearly, and systematically reported to the school community.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 119
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
9.1 – 9.15: Indicators for all schools
MSA Indicator of Quality Rating
1 2 3 4
9.1 The leadership and staff commit to, participate in,
and share in accountability for student learning. X
9.2 Assessment of student learning and performance
is aligned with curriculum and instruction in a
coherent system consistent with the school’s
philosophy/mission.
X
9.3.a Assessment results are analyzed with appropriate
frequency and rigor for individual students as
they move through the school
X
9.3.b Assessment results are analyzed with appropriate
frequency and rigor for cohorts of students as they
move through the school
X
9.3.c Assessment results are analyzed with appropriate
frequency and rigor for comparable (local, state,
and national) groups outside of the school
X
9.4 Assessment results are used to make decisions
regarding allocation of resources. X
9.5 The assessment of student learning and
performance enables students to monitor their
own learning progress and teachers to adapt their
instruction to students’ specific learning needs.
X
9.6 Assessment methods and content address suitable
social, emotional, physical, and
cognitive/language goals for students.
X
9.7 Assessments take into account recent, reliable
research findings on child development and
growth.
X
9.8 Assessments reflect understanding of the unique
needs and backgrounds of each student. X
9.9 Records of students’ learning and performance are
maintained. General standards for transcript
control and use, including those related to
confidentiality, are known and observed.
X
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 120
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
MSA Indicator of Quality Rating
1 2 3 4
9.10 Assessment results are the basis for making
recommendations to families whose children may
benefit from further evaluation. Referrals to
specialists are made for early identification of
possible disabilities and/or health conditions.
X
9.11 Members of the staff work collaboratively with
colleagues and families to review data about
learners’ progress and to develop appropriate
strategies for continued progress.
X
9.12 Families are viewed as an important source of
information and insights about students. X
9.13 The school communicates its assessment policies
and practices to the total school community (e.g.,
via parent handbooks, web sites, teacher
handbooks, policy manuals).
X
9.14 Communication with families regarding students’
progress in learning and performance is regular,
productive, and meaningful.
X
9.15 Students learn and perform at levels expected, or
progress is being made to raise results
accordingly.
X
9.16: Indicator for schools with early age programs
X These Indicators are not applicable to our school.
9.17 - 9.20: Indicators for schools that provide distance education
X These Indicators are not applicable to our school.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 121
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
9.21: Indicator for faith-based schools11
These Indicators are not applicable to our school.
MSA Indicator of Quality Rating
1 2 3 4
9.21 Evaluation of the students’ knowledge of the
religious beliefs and values of the school is
included in the school’s assessment program.
X
B.1. Stakeholders’ comments to support the ratings:
No comments
B.2. Evidence:
Indicator
No. Evidence
A rating of 1 or 2 was not received in any of the indicators of quality.
C. Self-Assessment of Adherence to the Standard for Accreditation
X Our self-assessment is that our school MEETS this Standard for Accreditation
Our self-assessment is that our school DOES NOT MEET this Standard for
Accreditation for the following reason(s):
11
The use of the Faith-Based Indicators for this and the other Standards for Accreditation by faith-based
schools is voluntary and not required, unless their use is directed by the head of a parent school system
such as a Diocesan/Archdiocesan or a similar system of schools. The Faith-Based Indicators allow faith-
based schools, if they desire, to include in their self-study and accreditation process Indicators of Quality
that address unique characteristics of and expectations for schools whose mission and educational
program are defined wholly or in part by their particular faith.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 122
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
D. Root Cause Analysis
Foundational Issue: Assessment and Evidence of Student Learning
Are there school climate and
organization standard indicators
not met or in need of improvement
that inhibit the attainment of the
organizational capacity objective?
X NO
YES
Data to support your conclusion:
Stakeholder’s feedback and surveys provided
the data for this standard.
Hypothesis derived from your
conclusion:
Assessment and Evidence of Students
Learning standards have been met.
E. Implications for Planning
E.1. List the school’s significant strengths in meeting the Assessment and Evidence
of Student Learning Standard.
Teachers use a variety of assessments: collaborative/group work, subjective,
objective, research, oral reports, projects, listening, writing essays/short answer,
classwork and homework.
Assessment/evidence is used to make recommendations for Special Services
(Student Support Team, CCIU Reading, CCIU Math, CCIU Speech/Language,
CCIU Guidance).
Standardized tests are administered: Terra Nova allows a snapshot of overall
school performance.
Evaluations of the students’ knowledge of religious beliefs are administered and
evidence of them living their faith is assessed.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 123
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
E.2. List the school’s significant areas in need of improvement in meeting the
Assessment and Evidence of Student Learning Standard.
Concepts are addressed and assessed but not taken to the level of application in
many subject areas.
Assessment results are not regularly used to make decisions regarding allocation
of resources.
E.3. Based on the strengths and areas for improvement identified, list any
important next steps or strategic priorities related to Assessment and Evidence
of Student Learning that should be included in the action plan in the Plan for
Growth and Improvement.
Revise instruction based on assessment results and revisit concepts more
frequently.
Provide authentic examples of student work by using assessments for various
areas of study (ex. giving a science experiment to the English teacher to use for
evaluation).
Regularly use assessments to make decisions on the allocation of resources.
F. Evidence to Support the Assessment of This Standard
Evidence School
Example of student transcript X
Example student report card X
Reports of the results of assessments administered to students X
Policies related to assessment of student learning:
School-wide Terra Nova test results X
Option C/My Students Progress X
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 124
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
STUDENT SERVICES STANDARD FOR ACCREDITATION
A. Issues Related To This Standard
The following requirements ask the school to provide a self-assessment of expectations
for quality included in this Standard for Accreditation. The information and data
requested in this section are not for evaluation purposes. Instead, the information and
data assist the school in making the determination whether it meets the Standard and
its Indicators of Quality.
A.1. STUDENT SERVICES STAFF:
Type of Student
Services Personnel Number Source
Adequacy of
Type and Number
S NI U
Guidance Counselor 1
Staff
X Outsourced X
Psychologist 0
Staff
Outsourced
Psychiatrist 0
Staff
Outsourced
Substance Abuse
Counselor 0
Staff
Outsourced
Certified Special
Education Teacher 0
Staff
Outsourced
Special Education
Paraprofessional 0
Staff
Outsourced
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 125
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
Type of Student
Services Personnel Number Source
Adequacy of
Type and Number
S NI U
Food Services 1
X Staff X
Outsourced
Transportation
Services 6
Staff X
X Outsourced
Admissions
Counselor 0
Staff
Outsourced
Other: Reading
Specialist 1
Staff
X
X Outsourced
Other: Math
Specialist 1
Staff
X
X Outsourced
Other: Speech and
Language Therapist 1
Staff
X
X Outsourced
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 126
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
B. Self-Assessment of Adherence to the Indicators Of Quality
The school must meet this Standard for Accreditation to be granted “Accreditation” by
the Middle States Association. The Indicators of Quality for the Standard identify the
types of evidence that, when taken together, indicate whether the school meets the
Standard. The school may indicate other types of evidence particular to the school in the
“Other” section provided below. Rate the degree to which the school meets each
Indicator by using the following scale:
Rating of Adherence to the Indicator
1. Does Not Meet The evidence indicates the school system does not meet
the expectations of this Indicator
2. Partially Meets/In
Need of Improvement
The evidence indicates that the school system partially
meets the expectations of this Indicator and is in need of
improvement
3. Meets The evidence indicates the school system meets the
expectations of this Indicator
4. Exceeds The evidence indicates the school system exceeds the
expectations of this Indicator
Middle States Association Accreditation Standard:
Student Services
The Standard: The school implements written policies and procedures, in
partnership with families and the community, that provide all students with, or refer
them to, services that are age- and developmentally appropriate to optimize
opportunities for life-long success. Student services are systematic and integral to the
educational program. They are provided by qualified personnel, sufficiently financed,
periodically evaluated, and philosophy/mission appropriate.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 127
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
10.1 – 10.26: Indicators for all schools
Student Support Services
MSA Indicator of Quality Rating
1 2 3 4
10.1 Student support services address academic skills
development, social skills development, personal
growth, and career planning.
X
10.2 Counselors, administrators, teachers, and/or other
staff members share responsibility for providing
guidance and support to students.
X
10.3 The school is sensitive to the critical importance of
non-academic needs of students. A process is in
place to address students’ emotional and social
needs.
X
10.4 Assessment data are used to adapt curriculum
and teaching methods, provide personalized
counseling, and identify appropriate program
placement for students.
X
10.5 Career awareness activities are provided as
appropriate. X
10.6 Student support services extend into and
incorporate community services as needed. X
10.7 Student data are current, comprehensive, and
readily available for the staff’s use. X
10.8 Follow-up studies of graduates and other former
students are carried out and data are shared with
staff to help determine the effectiveness of the
school’s educational program and services.
X
10.9 The school offers an orientation program for new
students and their families to share the school’s
philosophy/mission, policies, procedures, and
expectations.
X
10.10 Families are provided with information about
child development, education, and related topics
through personal communications, pamphlets,
meetings, and referrals to web sites and other
resources.
X
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 128
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
Transportation Services
MSA Indicator of Quality Rating
1 2 3 4
10.11 Written policies and procedures are implemented
to ensure the safety of students when being
picked up, transported, and dropped off by
transportation provided by the school.
X
10.12 Appropriate training is provided to transportation
providers. X
10.13 Transportation services provided or contracted by
the school meet the safety requirements of all
appropriate legal authorities.
X
Food Services
MSA Indicator of Quality Rating
1 2 3 4
10.14 Student dining areas are functional and hygienic. X
10.15 Meals provided by the school meet generally
accepted nutritional standards. Information about
nutritional values of the foods is available.
X
10.16 Appropriate training is provided to food services
providers. X
10.17 Food services personnel meet the health
requirements of all appropriate authorities. X
10.18 Food service facilities are inspected regularly and
meet the health and safety requirements of all
appropriate authorities.
X
Services for Student with Special Needs
MSA Indicator of Quality Rating
1 2 3 4
10.19 The school implements written policies and
procedures to identify and address the needs of
students with special needs.
X
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 129
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
MSA Indicator of Quality Rating
1 2 3 4
10.20 The school provides or refers families to
appropriate related services and/or
accommodations to meet student needs.
X
10.21 As applicable, the school is in compliance with all
local, state, and federal requirements related to
students with special needs.
X
Admissions and Placement
MSA Indicator of Quality Rating
1 2 3 4
10.22 The school implements written admissions policies
and procedures. X
10.23 The school implements written policies and
procedures for placement of students in
appropriate programs and levels.
X
10.24 Applicants for enrollment and their families are
clearly informed of the philosophy/mission of the
school, the nature and extent of the educational
program and services available, tuition and fees (if
applicable), school policies, and expectations for
satisfactory student performance.
X
10.25 The school accepts students for whom there is a
reasonable expectation of success in the
educational program as appropriate and
interpreted by law.
X
10.26 All statements and representations relating to the
school’s educational programs, services, and
resources are clear, accurate, and current.
X
10.27 – 10.31: Indicators for schools that provide distance education
X These Indicators are not applicable to our school.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 130
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
10.32 – 10.35: Indicators for faith-based schools12
These Indicators are not applicable to our school.
MSA Indicator of Quality Rating
1 2 3 4
10.32 The guidance/counseling services reflect the
school’s religious identity and mission. X
10.33 Counseling and campus ministry personnel
cooperate on programs addressing emerging
student needs.
X
10.34 Guidance services support the development of the
faith-based community of the school. X
10.35 Admissions policies are consistent with the
school’s religious values and traditions. X
B.1. Stakeholders’ comments to support the ratings:
The quality of guidance services is strong; however, the ratio of guidance staff to
student population is inadequate to meet the needs of all the stakeholders in a
timely fashion.
The students indicate that they have enjoyed career days and other career activities
in the classroom and would like to have more of these types of activities.
Students feel the overall environment on their school buses needs to improve so that
the drivers are able to concentrate and operate the buses safely. Families are
concerned with overcrowding, noise, and disruptive behavior.
Although the food service program has improved, a significant number of students
commented that they would like to see an increase in the quantity and variety of
food available.
12
The use of the Faith-Based Indicators for this and the other Standards for Accreditation by faith-based
schools is voluntary and not required, unless their use is directed by the head of a parent school system
such as a Diocesan/Archdiocesan or a similar system of schools. The Faith-Based Indicators allow faith-
based schools, if they desire, to include in their self-study and accreditation process Indicators of Quality
that address unique characteristics of and expectations for schools whose mission and educational
program are defined wholly or in part by their particular faith.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 131
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
B.2. Evidence:
Indicator
No. Evidence
A rating of 1 or 2 was not received in any of the indicators of quality.
C. Self-Assessment of Adherence to the Standard For Accreditation
X Our self-assessment is that our school MEETS this Standard for Accreditation
Our self-assessment is that our school DOES NOT MEET this Standard for
Accreditation for the following reason(s):
D. Root Cause Analysis
Foundational Issue: Student Services
Are there student services standard
indicators not met or in need of
improvement that inhibit the
attainment of the organizational
capacity objective?
YES
X NO
Data to support your conclusion:
Stakeholder’s feedback and surveys provided
the data for this standard.
Hypothesis derived from your
conclusion:
Student Services standards have been met.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 132
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
E. Implications for Planning
E.1. List the school’s significant strengths in meeting the Student Services
Standard.
Our school has a strong support staff, provided through the Chester County
Intermediate Unit (CCIU), which provides services in the areas of
speech/language, reading, math and guidance counseling.
The guidance and counseling program provides students with individual
counseling and classroom guidance lessons based on the developmental needs of
the students.
Our school also has a Student Support Team (SST), which provides teachers and
parents with a process for addressing academic and behavioral concerns by
adjusting instruction and applying strategies in the classroom and at home to
meet measurable goals.
E.2. List the school’s significant areas in need of improvement in meeting the
Student Services Standard.
The school needs to improve the ratio of support staff to students requiring
services.
Although the nutritional quality and administration of the school lunch program
has improved significantly over the years, student survey input indicates that it
may be necessary to assess the quantity and variety of food being offered.
Although the indicators for quality of transportation services were met overall,
student survey input shows that there are significant concerns about the
environment on the buses. Issues mentioned include overcrowding, high noise
levels, and disruptive behaviors which may cause bus drivers to become
distracted.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 133
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
E.3. Based on the strengths and areas for improvement identified, list any
important next steps or strategic priorities related to Student Services that
should be included in the action plan in the Plan for Growth and
Improvement.
Additional staffing is needed for the guidance and counseling program. It may
be beneficial to have one counselor for Grades K - 4 and one for Grades 5 - 8.
Since the number of students with special needs is increasing, it would be
beneficial to establish a resource room with a certified special education teacher.
It may be helpful to survey students and parents about the current lunch
program to see if there are any adjustments needed. Perhaps students in Grades
6 - 8 could be offered the opportunity to purchase additional items if the quantity
of the food in the standard lunch is not sufficiently meeting their needs.
Since bus transportation is contracted through a local transportation company, it
may be beneficial to request a presentation for children and parents on bus
safety. This presentation may need to be repeated annually. It might also be
helpful to establish a “formal safety patrol” program such as the one offered
through the American Automobile Association.
F. Evidence to Support the Assessment of This Standard
Evidence School
Admissions criteria (if applicable) X
Description of guidance and counseling services available X
Results of follow-up studies of graduates
Policies related to student services X
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 134
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
STUDENT LIFE AND STUDENT ACTIVITIES STANDARD
FOR ACCREDITATION
A. Issues Related To This Standard
The following requirements ask the school to provide a self-assessment of expectations
for quality included in this Standard for Accreditation. The information and data
requested in this section are not for evaluation purposes. Instead, the information and
data assist the school in making the determination whether it meets the Standard and
its Indicators of Quality.
A.1. SUMMARY OF NON-ATHLETIC STUDENT ACTIVITIES.
Type of Student Activity
Number of
Students
Participating
Adequacy and
Quality of the
Activity
Student Council 28 S
Little Flowers (2013-2014) 38 S
Bricks for Kids 36 S
Band 80 S
Chorus 25 S
Music Ministry 27 S
Altar Servers 65 S
Science Fair 66 NI
Math Counts 20 S
Yearbook Committee 24 S
Talent Show 100 S
Jazz Band 15 S
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 135
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
Type of Student Activity
Number of
Students
Participating
Adequacy and
Quality of the
Activity
Legion of Mary 1 S
Passion Play 100 S
Drama Club (2014 – 2015) 18 S
A.2. SUMMARY OF ATHLETIC STUDENT ACTIVITIES.
Type of Student
Activity Available for
Number of
Students
Participating
Adequacy and Quality
of the Activity
Males Females S NI U
Soccer X X 32 X
Field Hockey X 17 X
Flag Football X X 22 X
Cross Country X 9 X
Volleyball X 27 X
Cheerleading X 10 X
Football X 8 X
Basketball X X 69 X
Ice Hockey X 10 X
Track X X 87 X
Lacrosse X X 52 X
Baseball X 33 X
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 136
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
B. Self-Assessment of Adherence to the Indicators of Quality
The school must meet this Standard for Accreditation to be granted “Accreditation” by
the Middle States Association. The Indicators of Quality for the Standard identify the
types of evidence that, when taken together, indicate whether the school meets the
Standard. The school may indicate other types of evidence particular to the school in the
“Other” section provided below. Rate the degree to which the school meets each
Indicator by using the following scale:
Rating of Adherence to the Indicator
1. Does Not Meet The evidence indicates the school system does not meet
the expectations of this Indicator
2. Partially Meets/In
Need of Improvement
The evidence indicates that the school system partially
meets the expectations of this Indicator and is in need of
improvement
3. Meets The evidence indicates the school system meets the
expectations of this Indicator
4. Exceeds The evidence indicates the school system exceeds the
expectations of this Indicator
Middle States Association Accreditation Standard 11:
Student Life and Student Activities
The Standard: A healthy atmosphere exists for all students. At all levels, non-
discriminatory, appropriate student activities that supplement classroom experiences or
community life are provided. An appropriate student activities program fosters a
positive intellectual, cultural, and social climate, promotes growth in student leadership
and social interaction skills, and encourages students’ special interests.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 137
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
11.1. – 11.6: Indicators for all schools
MSA Indicator of Quality Rating
1 2 3 4
11.1 Students are offered opportunities to build their
skills in handling responsibility, taking initiative,
leadership competencies, cooperation, and self-
direction.
X
11.2 Students, staff, families, and the community are
encouraged to offer input about and participate in
student activities.
X
11.3 Staff members, parents, and other volunteers who
lead or participate in student activities are
approved by the school’s leadership, suitably
qualified, and provide appropriate supervision to
students.
X
11.4 The school recognizes student accomplishments,
contributions, and responsibilities in meaningful
ways.
X
11.5 Relationships among staff, volunteers, and
students demonstrate respect, fairness, and
understanding.
X
11.6 The school holds events that include staff,
families, and children. X
11.7 – 11.9: Indicators for boarding schools
X These Indicators are not applicable to our school.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 138
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
11.10: Indicator for faith-based schools13
These Indicators are not applicable to our school.
MSA Indicator of Quality Rating
1 2 3 4
11.10 All student activities and athletics include
opportunities for the faith formation of the
students. X
B.1. Stakeholders’ comments to support the ratings:
Recognition should be given for all student accomplishments including school
and extracurricular activities.
Consideration should be given to improving CYO uniforms.
The number and variety of non-athletic clubs should be increased to include
theatre, cooking and foreign languages.
B.2. Evidence:
Indicator
No. Evidence
A rating of 1 or 2 was not received in any of the indicators of quality.
13
The use of the Faith-Based Indicators for this and the other Standards for Accreditation by faith-based
schools is voluntary and not required, unless their use is directed by the head of a parent school system
such as a Diocesan/Archdiocesan or a similar system of schools. The Faith-Based Indicators allow faith-
based schools, if they desire, to include in their self-study and accreditation process Indicators of Quality
that address unique characteristics of and expectations for schools whose mission and educational
program are defined wholly or in part by their particular faith.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 139
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
C. Self-Assessment of Adherence to the Standard for Accreditation
X Our self-assessment is that our school MEETS this Standard for Accreditation
Our self-assessment is that our school DOES NOT MEET this Standard for
Accreditation for the following reason(s):
D. Root Cause Analysis
Foundational Issue: Student Life and Student Activities
Are there student life and student
activities standard indicators not
met or in need of improvement that
inhibit the attainment of the
organizational capacity objective?
YES
X NO
Data to support your conclusion:
Stakeholder’s feedback and surveys provided
data for the standard.
Hypothesis derived from your
conclusion:
Student Life and Student Activities standards
have been met.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 140
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
E. Implications for Planning
E.1. List the school’s significant strengths in meeting the Student Life and Student
Activities Standard.
There is a strong, active CYO Program at Saint Joseph School that offers a variety
of sports to students. Our Band, Chorus and Music Ministry offer additional
performing arts options.
E.2. List the school’s significant areas in need of improvement in meeting the
Student Life and Student Activities Standard.
A more diverse selection of student activities to meet the interests of students
should be provided. Although we have a vibrant Performing Arts Program, it is
not supported financially and exists with limited space and offerings. The needs
of the Band and Choral Program would be more adequately met if there was a
designated rehearsal space within the school.
E.3. Based on the strengths and areas for improvement identified, list any
important next steps or strategic priorities related to Student Life and Student
Activities that should be included in the action plan in the Plan for Growth
and Improvement.
The addition of visual and performing arts will lead to an increase in intellectual
and cultural opportunities.
Stipends should be provided to encourage advisors for these groups.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 141
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
F. Evidence to Support the Assessment of This Standard
Evidence School
Samples of student publications—e.g., yearbook, student newspaper,
literary magazine X
Budget for all athletic activities X
Budget for all non-athletic activities X
Policies on academic eligibility
Policies related to student life and student activities X
*Some non-athletic activities are financed through the Home and School Association or
are provided by outside agencies or organizations, such as Bricks 4 Kidz, Drama Club,
and Chorus.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 142
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
INFORMATION RESOURCES AND TECHNOLOGY
STANDARD FOR ACCREDITATION
A. Issues Related To This Standard
The following requirements ask the school to provide a self-assessment of expectations
for quality included in this Standard for Accreditation. The information and data
requested in this section are not for evaluation purposes. Instead, the information and
data assist the school in making the determination whether it meets the Standard and
its Indicators of Quality.
A.1. INFORMATION RESOURCES AND TECHNOLOGY:
Type of Information/Technology Resource Quantity of
Resource
Quality and Adequacy
of Resource
S NI U
Curriculum Focused Printed Books 9314 X
Reference Printed Books 1844 X
Leisure Reading Printed Books 9718
Magazine/Journal Subscriptions 7 X
Online Subscriptions 1 X
Curriculum Specific Application Software
Programs 0
Administrative Application Software
Programs 1 X
Application Software Programs Available on
School Network 5 X
Networked Desktop Computers for Students 58 X
Networked Laptop Computers for Students 64 X
Stand Alone Desktop Computers for
Students 3 X
Stand Alone Laptop Computers for Students 0
Stand Alone Computers for Students in
Information Resources Center 0
Stand Alone Laptop Computers for Students
in Information Resources Center 0
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 143
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
Type of Information/Technology Resource Quantity of
Resource
Quality and Adequacy
of Resource
S NI U
Networked Computers for Students in
Information Resources Center 2 X
Networked Laptop Computers for Students
in Information Resources Center 0
Networked Desktop and/or Laptop
Computers for the Staff 1 X
Stand Alone Desktop and/or Laptop
Computers for the Staff in Classrooms/
Offices
0
Networked Desktop and/or Laptop
Computers for the Staff in Classrooms/
Offices
41 X
Classrooms with Hard-Wired Internet Access 34 X
Classrooms with Wireless Internet Access 34 X
LCD Projectors 33 X
Overhead Projectors 5 X
Classrooms with TV Monitor 0
Classrooms with Monitor Connected to
Computer 33 X
PDAs for Staff 0
PDAs for Students 0
Video Cameras 0
Video Recorders 0
Classrooms with Smart Board 25 X
Other: Apple TVs 16 X
Other: I-pads for Students 30 X
Other: I-Pads for Staff 20 X
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 144
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
A.2. FACILITIES FOR INFORMATION RESOURCES AND TECHNOLOGY:
Type of Information/Technology Facility Quality and
Adequacy of Facility
S NI U
Information Resources Center (library, media center) X
Technology Resource Center X
Storage for Information Resources X
Storage for Technology X
Facility for Electronic Production: NA
Office for Information Resources Staff X
Office for Technology Staff X
A.3. INFORMATION RESOURCES AND TECHNOLOGY STAFF:
Type of Information Resources and
Technology Personnel Number
Adequacy of Type and
Number
S NI U
Credentialed Information Resources Center
(library, media center) personnel 1 X
Information Resources Center (library,
media center) support personnel 2 X
Technology Support 1 X
Production: NA
B. Self-Assessment of Adherence to the Indicators Of Quality
The school must meet this Standard for Accreditation to be granted “Accreditation” by
the Middle States Association. The Indicators of Quality for the Standard identify the
types of evidence that, when taken together, indicate whether the school meets the
Standard. The school may indicate other types of evidence particular to the school in the
“Other” section provided below. Rate the degree to which the school meets each
Indicator by using the following scale:
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 145
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
Rating of Adherence to the Indicator
1. Does Not Meet The evidence indicates the school system does not meet
the expectations of this Indicator
2. Partially Meets/In
Need of Improvement
The evidence indicates that the school system partially
meets the expectations of this Indicator and is in need of
improvement
3. Meets The evidence indicates the school system meets the
expectations of this Indicator
4. Exceeds The evidence indicates the school system exceeds the
expectations of this Indicator
Middle States Association Accreditation Standard
Information Resources and Technology
The Standard: Information resources, materials, and technology are accessible and of
adequate scope, quantity, and quality to facilitate the school’s pursuit of its total
educational program. These resources encourage all students and staff to broaden and
extend their knowledge and skills. Access to appropriate information resources and
technology is provided for students and staff. Appropriate instruction is offered to
develop student and staff inquiry, research, and information literacy skills. Information
technology equipment is functional and well maintained.
12.1 – 12.11: Indicators for all schools
Information Resources
MSA Indicator of Quality Rating
1 2 3 4
12.1 Information resources are properly catalogued, housed, and
periodically reviewed for relevancy and currency. X
12.2 Media center staff is sufficient and appropriately qualified
to provide effective services to students and staff. X
12.3 Adequate orientation about the use of media services,
learning resources, and equipment is provided to the staff
and students.
X
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 146
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
MSA Indicator of Quality Rating
1 2 3 4
12.4 Information resources are appropriately supported annually
with funding from the school’s budget. X
12.5 Information resources are age- and developmentally
appropriate, current, and reflect social and cultural
diversity.
X
12.6 Staff and students are provided opportunities to offer input
into the types, quality, and format of the information
resources provided.
X
Technology
MSA Indicator of Quality Rating
1 2 3 4
12.7 The technology resources staff is sufficient and
appropriately qualified to provide effective
service to students and staff.
X
12.8 Technology resources are appropriately
maintained and supported annually with funding
from the school’s budget and our Home & School
Association.
X
12.9 Adequate skills training on the use of technology
resources and equipment is provided to the staff
and students.
X
12.10 The school implements written policies and
procedures for acceptable use of technology. X
12.11 Long-range planning activities are in place to
ensure that the school keeps pace with
technological changes.
X
12.12 – 12.13: Indicators for schools with early age programs
X These Indicators are not applicable to our school.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 147
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
12.14 – 12.15: Indicators for schools that provide distance education
X These Indicators are not applicable to our school.
B.1. Stakeholders’ comments to support the ratings:
Student & Parent comments include:
Netbooks or personal mobile devices need to be provided to all students
to better utilize technology in the classroom.
Students need additional access to the computer lab for academic work.
Netbooks need to be upgraded.
More time in the lab/in front of a computer is necessary to complete work.
Incorporate Bring Your Own Device.
Staff comments include:
More IT support is necessary to sustain the demands of the school staff.
Before the technology can be updated and improved, the wireless network
infrastructure needs to be improved.
Technology training is necessary, for all teachers, in order to better utilize
all new educational tools.
B.2. Evidence:
Indicator
No. Evidence
A rating of 1 or 2 was not received in any of the indicators of quality.
C. Self-Assessment of Adherence to the Standard for Accreditation
X Our self-assessment is that our school MEETS with this Standard for
Accreditation
Our self-assessment is that our school DOES NOT MEET this Standard for
Accreditation for the following reason(s):
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 148
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
D. Root Cause Analysis
Foundational Issue: Information Resources and Technology
Are there information resources
and technology standard indicators
not met or in need of improvement
that inhibit the attainment of the
organizational capacity objective?
YES
X NO
Data to support your conclusion:
Stakeholder’s feedback and surveys provided
data for this standard.
Hypothesis derived from your
conclusion:
Information Resources and Technology
standards have been met.
E. Implications for Planning
E.1. List the school’s significant strengths in meeting the Information Resources
and Technology Standard.
The financial support from our Home and School Association is an invaluable
strength for our entire Technology Program.
The students, parents, and staff of Saint Joseph School support our Acceptable
Use Policy, which is renewed each year.
The students and staff have adequate access to information resources and
technology. A desktop computer is provided for each teacher’s use in the
classroom. Many classrooms have one or two additional desktop PCs that are
available for the students’ use.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 149
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
E.2. List the school’s significant areas in need of improvement in meeting the
Information Resources and Technology Standard.
The current technology infrastructure is still not sufficient to support the
necessary increase of mobile devices in the school. The lack of performance and
functionality on the network has affected the use of this widely known
technology.
To keep up with the current trends in technology, the entire staff is in need of
training for continued Smart Board success and for the future training on mobile
devices that will be purchased for our students in the future.
It is suggested that there be on-site IT Support, on some kind of a rotating or bi-
monthly schedule, in addition to the technology teacher already on school
premises.
E.3. Based on the strengths and areas for improvement identified, list any
important next steps or strategic priorities related to Information Resources
and Technology that should be included in the action plan in the Plan for
Growth and Improvement.
There needs to be a dedicated funding source available for updating and
maintaining the school’s Information Resources and Technology.
The school has made the decision to improve the overall performance and
functionality of its wired and wireless network. This decision was made so that
the school can keep up with the current demands and advances in wireless
technologies and learning opportunities for our students and teachers. Doing so
will allow the school to focus resources on education-enhancing solutions.
F. Evidence to Support the Assessment of This Standard
Evidence School
The information resources and technology plan(s) X
Budget for information resources and technology X
Information skills curriculum X
Policies related to information resources and technology (AUP) X
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 150
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 151
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
SELF-ASSESSMENT OF THE
INDICATORS OF QUALITY FOR
CURRICULUM, INSTRUCTION, AND ASSESSMENT
s an educational institution, a school needs to give considerable attention to the
quality and comprehensiveness of its curriculum as well as the effectiveness of
the instructional pedagogy and assessment practices used to ensure student
success.
As part of its planning for growth and improvement, the school conducted an in-depth
self-examination of the curriculum, instructional program, and assessment practices for
those components of its educational program that are deemed essential to the areas of
student performance that have been identified as the priorities for growth and
improvement. Using the Middle States Indicators of Quality for Curriculum,
Instruction, and Assessment, this self-assessment required the school to look carefully
at its written curriculum, how the curriculum is delivered to the students, and the
practices used to assess the degree to which the students are achieving the learning
goals of the curriculum.
The overall purpose of this self-assessment is to identify any aspects of the school’s
curriculum, instructional pedagogy, and assessment practices that need to be developed
or improved to increase the likelihood that the school will be able to achieve the goals it
set for growing and improving student performance. Areas identified for development
and/or improvement should be included in the action plans for the measurable student
performance and organizational capacity goals that are the heart of the Plan for Growth
and Improvement.
While the Visiting Team does not evaluate the quality of the curricular components
selected for self-assessment, the Team will note those areas the school identified for
development and/or improvement and expects to see those areas addressed in the
action plans.
A
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 152
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
SELF-ASSESSMENT OF THE INDICATORS OF
QUALITY FOR CURRICULUM, INSTRUCTION, AND
ASSESSMENT IN THE
Religion
COMPONENT OF THE EDUCATION PROGRAM
The self-assessment of the degree to which this component of the school's education
program meets the Indicators of Quality for Curriculum, Instruction, and Assessment
was conducted by the following process:
X A subcommittee comprised of the following individuals:
Committee Member’s Name Role in the School’s Community (e.g. teacher,
parent, student, etc.)
Emily Novak (Chairperson) Teacher - Kindergarten
Diane Mascuilli (Chairperson) Teacher – Grade 8
Kathleen Delio Teacher – Grade 8 / Parent
Patricia Lewis Teacher – Grade 6
Sister Christine Lamb, IHM Teacher – Grade 5
Ruth Jung Teacher – Grade 3
Cathy Herb Teacher – Grade 2 / Parent
Patricia Cleveland Teacher – Pre-K
Patricia Galvin Teacher – Technology/ IT
Joanne Cardine Teacher – Music / Choral Director
Lorraine Geiling Teacher - Art
**NOTE: Committee size and composition may vary depending upon the school’s size, the
topic to be addressed, etc. If needed, add lines to the above chart.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 153
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
If the school used a committee to conduct the self-assessment, explain how all of the
school’s community of stakeholders was given opportunities to provide input into
the self-assessment.
At the end of the 2013-2014 School year, faculty and administration were asked to make
a determination for curricular areas in regards to the self-study. Along with Religion,
Science and ELA were the areas picked to examine. Members of the Religion committee
filled out the Indicators of Quality for Curriculum. The goal is to prepare students to be
21st Century learners equipped with the skills necessary to succeed. The results were
shared with faculty at the February 2015 Faculty meeting.
X Survey of the school’s stakeholders using the Middle States Survey:
Total Number of Surveys Returned 461
The results represent surveys completed by:
Students X
Parents X
Faculty and Staff X
Administrators X
A. ISSUES RELATED TO THE INDICATORS OF QUALITY
The following requirements ask the school system to provide a self-assessment of
expectations for quality for curriculum, instruction, and assessment in this component
of the school's educational program. The information and data requested in this section
are not for evaluation purposes. Instead, the information and data will assist the system
in making the determination whether it meets the Standard and its Indicators of
Quality.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 154
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
1. CURRICULAR COMPONENT SUMMARY: On the chart below, summarize the
course/program offerings for this component of the education program by completing each
column as described.
Grade Level: Religion is taught at all grade levels – from Pre-
Kindergarten through Grade 8.
Course Title: Catholic faith, Scripture, Church doctrine, morality, and
social justice. For curriculum that is specific to grade levels,
please see the Archdiocesan Curriculum Guidelines
Archdiocese of Philadelphia
Religion Guidelines
Pre-Kindergarten
First Trimester Second Trimester Third Trimester
Identity Advent Prayer
The Blessed Mother The Holy Family Sacraments
Prayer Epiphany Lent
Creation Christian Community The Easter Season
Feasts Respect for Ourselves and Others Mary, Mother of God, Our
Mother
The Trinity Feasts We Honor our
Parents/Guardians
Thanksgiving Prayer Celebration
Kindergarten
First Trimester Second Trimester Third Trimester
Prayer The Liturgical Year Prayer
Mary Prayer The Trinity
Christian Community Sacraments Saints
Saints The Holy Family Feasts and Special People
Feasts and Special People Feasts Easter Season
Traditional Prayer Worship Mary
Creation Sacramentals We Honor our
Parents/Guardians
The Bible Ordinary Time
Grade 1
First Trimester Second Trimester Third Trimester
God the Father Living in God’s World God the Holy Spirit
Creation God the Son: Jesus Christ Sacraments of Initiation
Titles of Mary Days in Honor of Mary Prayers to Mary; Mary
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 155
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
Liturgical Year Liturgical Year Liturgical Year
Saints (August to November) Saints (December to March) Saints (April to July)
Prayer Prayer Prayer
Social Justice Social Justice Social Justice
Sacramentals Sacramentals Sacramentals
Grade 2
First Trimester Second Trimester Third Trimester
Blessed Trinity The Mass: Liturgy of the Word Topics related to the Mass
Sacraments: Initiation, Healing,
and at the Service of Communion
The Mass: Liturgy of the
Eucharist
Mass and Eucharist
Titles of Mary; Rosary Days in Honor of Mary May Devotions
Liturgical Year Liturgical Year Liturgical Year
Saints (August to November) Saints (December to March) Saints (April to July)
Prayer Prayer Prayer
Social Justice Social Justice Social Justice
Sacramentals Sacramentals Sacramentals
Grade 3
First Trimester Second Trimester Third Trimester
The Trinity Sacraments: Healing God’s Law
Sacraments: Initiation Sacraments: At the Healing of
Communion
Christian Community
Titles of Mary Days in Honor of Mary Prayers to Our Lady
Liturgical Year Liturgical Year Liturgical Year
Saints (August to November) Saints (December to May) Saints (April to July)
Prayer Prayer Prayer
Social Justice Social Justice Social Justice
Sacramentals Sacramentals Sacramentals
Grade 4
First Trimester Second Trimester Third Trimester
God the Father Grace Jesus Christ: Our Redeemer
Commandments Sin Beatitudes; Works of Mercy
Conscience Virtue
Mary: Example of Faith
Mary: Example of Holiness
Days in Honor of Mary Apparitions
Days in Honor of Mary
Titles of Mary
Liturgical Year Liturgical Year Liturgical Year
Saints (August to November) Saints (December to March) Saints (April to July)
Prayer Prayer Prayer
Social Justice Social Justice Social Justice
Sacramentals Sacramentals
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 156
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
Grade 5
First Trimester Second Trimester Third Trimester
Sacraments Sacraments of Initiation Sacraments of Healing
Sacraments of Initiation Sacraments at the Service of
Communion
Major Beliefs about Mary
Prayers to Mary
Mary and Christian Devotion
Days in Honor of Mary
Shrines to Our Lady
Days in Honor of Mary
Liturgical Year Liturgical Year Liturgical Year
Saints (August to November) Saints (December to March) Saints (April to July)
Prayer Prayer Prayer
Social Justice Social Justice Social Justice
Sacramentals
Grade 6
First Trimester Second Trimester Third Trimester
The Bible Old Testament: Moses, Exodus,
and the Covenant
Old Testament: Important
Queens, Prophets, Biblical
Women
Old Testament: Choosing a
Special People
Old Testament: Joshua, Judges,
Kings of Israel
Christ Fulfills the Old Testament
Dogmas believed about Mary
Days in Honor of Mary
Prayers to Mary: Biblical Places
and Mary
Days in Honor of Mary
Mysteries of the Rosary
Liturgical Year Liturgical Year Liturgical Year
Saints (August to November) Saints (December to March) Saints (April to July)
Prayer Prayer Prayer
Social Justice Social Justice Social Justice
Sacramentals
Grade 7
First Trimester Second Trimester Third Trimester
New Testament Jesus the Christ Liturgy and Worship
Jesus Jesus is Lord The Liturgical Life of the Church
Mary in the Gospels
The Virginal Conception
Always a Virgin
Days in Honor of Mary
Prayers to Mary
Blessedness of Mary
Mother of God
Days in Honor of Mary
Prayers to Mary
Liturgical Year Liturgical Year Liturgical Year
Saints (August to November) Saints (December to March) Saints (April to July)
Prayer Prayer Prayer
Social Justice Social Justice Social Justice
Sacramentals
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 157
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
Grade 8
First Trimester Second Trimester Third Trimester
The Church: Concept, Marks,
Development
The Dignity of the Human
Person, Human Freedom,
Human Conscience
The Ten Commandments
Liturgy: Sacraments and
Sacramentals
The Virtues, Sin, Mercy Christian Prayer
The Tradition of Prayer
Expressions of Prayer
Marian Churches and Shrines Law, Grace and Christian
Holiness
Challenges to Prayer
The Lord’s Prayer – “Our Father”
Mary in Art Titles of Mary
Days in Honor of Mary
Prayer to Mary
Mary and Christian Devotion
Days in Honor of Mary
Prayer to Mary
Liturgical Year Liturgical Year Liturgical Year
Saints (August to November) Saints (December to March) Saints (April to July)
Prayer Prayer Prayer
Social Justice Social Justice Social Justice
Hours per Week:
Grade Level(s)
Course Title
Hours per
Semester/Year
Pre-
Kindergarten
N/A
Kindergarten 75
Grade 1 150
Grade 2 150
Grade 3 Specific course titles/topics of study are 175
Grade 4 listed in the chart above. 175
Grade 5 220
Grade 6 220
Grade 7 220
Grade 8 200
X The instructional hours are reported for one academic week.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 158
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
2. Describe any gaps or omissions in the sequences of courses taught in this
component of the educational program. Provide a description of proposed
improvements and/or corrective actions that need to be taken. Include a description
of actions that have been initiated or are formally planned.
Curriculum is mandated by the Archdiocese of Philadelphia.
3. Describe any unnecessary repetitions in the sequences of courses taught in this
component of the educational program. Provide a description of proposed
improvements and/or corrective actions that need to be taken. Include a description
of actions that have been initiated or are formally planned.
There are no repetitions in the sequences of courses. Loyola Press is used from
Kindergarten through Grade 8.
4. ASSESSMENT RESULTS:
Name of Assessment/
Test Area(s) Assessed
Level of Student
Performance
S NI U
School-based Assessments Areas of the Religion
Curriculum are assessed
using a variety of
assessment tools.
X
End-of-the-Year
Assessments X
Projects X
Service Projects X
B. SELF-ASSESSMENT OF THE INDICATORS OF
QUALITY
The Indicators of Quality for Curriculum, Instruction and Assessment identify the
types of evidence that, when taken together, indicate whether the school meets the
expectations for quality in its educational program.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 159
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
Rating of Adherence to the Indicator
1. Does Not Meet The evidence indicates the school system does not meet
the expectations of this Indicator
2. Partially Meets/In
Need of Improvement
The evidence indicates that the school system partially
meets the expectations of this Indicator and is in need of
improvement
3. Meets The evidence indicates the school system meets the
expectations of this Indicator
4. Exceeds The evidence indicates the school system exceeds the
expectations of this Indicator
INDICATORS OF QUALITY FOR CURRICULUM
Indicators for All Schools
MSA Indicator of Quality Rating
1 2 3 4
CI.1. The development of the curriculum is based on a
thorough assessment of the basic concepts, skills,
and knowledge required of all students to fulfill the
stated goals of the program.
X
CI.2.The curriculum has established priorities, objectives,
and goals for all courses and units within the
program that are based on clearly defined
expectations for all students.
X
CI.3. The curriculum is designed to ensure the alignment
of teaching strategies, learning activities,
instructional support, instructional resources, and
assessment.
X
CI.4. The curriculum defines desired student outcomes
as expressed in terms of student understanding,
knowledge, attitudes, skills, and habits.
X
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 160
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
MSA Indicator of Quality Rating
1 2 3 4
CI.5. The curriculum provides experiences that promote
students’ critical thinking, reasoning, problem-
solving skills, and study skills.
X
CI.6. The learning expectations of the curriculum address
the diverse learning needs of the students without
compromising the essential knowledge and skills
students are expected to learn.
X
CI.7. Course objectives in the curriculum are simply
stated and understandable to students. X
CI.8. The skills and knowledge of the curriculum are
well-articulated and coordinated between all
teachers at each grade level and by teachers across
grade levels.
X
CI.9. Elementary, middle level, and secondary level staff
members work cooperatively to provide a
meaningful, and logical progression of learning
activities in the curriculum.
X
CI.10. The curriculum is designed to foster active
involvement of students in the learning process. X
CI.11. Instructional activities in the curriculum provide
opportunities for both exploration and
specialization in the content.
X
CI.12. The curriculum’s objectives and expectations for
learning are understood and supported by the
school community’s stakeholders.
X
CI.13. Parents and students are provided appropriate
opportunities to provide input into the
development of curriculum.
X
CI.14. Written curriculum guides identify objectives and
define the scope and sequence of the curriculum.
The guides are functional and in use.
X
CI.15. Learning materials used in the curriculum are
current and are selected to fulfill the goals and
objectives of the curriculum.
X
CI.16. Current best practices in, including the use of
technology and other media, are considered in the X
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 161
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
MSA Indicator of Quality Rating
1 2 3 4
selection of learning materials and media.
CI.17. Decisions made regarding the curriculum are
based on data about student performance,
knowledge about organizational development, and
research about best practices in curriculum,
instruction, and assessment.
X
CI.18. The content and instructional activities in the
curriculum are consistent with the school’s
philosophy/mission. X
CI.19. Administrative leadership and support are
provided in the coordination and articulation of the
curriculum.
X
CI.20. The curriculum is reviewed and evaluated
regularly and systematically. The curriculum
review/evaluation process includes safeguards to
ensure that the written curriculum is actually
taught. The review process focuses on what is to be
deleted from the curriculum as well as what is to be
added.
X
Stakeholders’ comments to support the ratings:
CI.8 – While most grade level teachers communicate among themselves, there is
little communication across the different grade levels.
CI.9 – Time is needed for staff members to work cooperatively to provide a
meaningful and logical progression of learning activities in the curriculum.
CI.13 – The curriculum is set by the Archdiocese.
CI.20 – The curriculum is provided by the Archdiocese.
Evidence:
• All ratings met or exceeded the standard.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 162
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
INDICATORS OF QUALITY FOR INSTRUCTION
Indicators for All Schools
MSA Indicator of Quality Rating
1 2 3 4
II.1. A variety of teaching strategies and techniques is
used to meet the needs of individual students in the
curriculum.
X
II.2. The scope and pacing of lessons in the curriculum
are appropriate for the students. X
II.3. Provision is made for appropriate amounts of
learning time for all aspects of the curriculum. X
II.4. Students are provided with additional assistance to
address specific learning challenges in the
curriculum when needed.
X
II.5. Students and teachers demonstrate mutual respect
toward each other in classes. X
II.6. Students demonstrate an understanding of cultural
differences by maintaining respect for each other in
classes.
X
II.7. Class sizes in promote and allow for varied
instructional strategies to be used. X
II.8. Meaningful and frequent communications with
parents are used to promote student learning in the
curriculum.
X
II.9. Members of the faculty are qualified, competent, and
dedicated to the objectives of the curriculum. X
II.10. Members of the faculty maintain safe, positive, and
supportive classroom environments. X
II.11.The faculty is provided with continuing
professional growth activities that support the
effective fulfillment of curriculum objectives.
Support for effective use of research-based
instructional practices is provided to teachers.
X
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 163
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
Stakeholders’ comments to support the ratings:
• All ratings met or exceeded the standard.
INDICATORS OF QUALITY FOR ASSESSMENT
Indicators for All Schools
MSA Indicator of Quality Rating
1 2 3 4
AI.1. Assessment of student learning and performance is
aligned with curriculum and instruction in the
curriculum
X
AI.2. A variety of methods for assessing student learning
is used in the curriculum. X
AI.3. Assessment results in the curriculum are analyzed
with appropriate frequency and rigor for
individual students as they move through courses
in the curriculum.
X
a. Assessment results in the curriculum are analyzed
with appropriate frequency and rigor for cohorts
of students as they move through courses in the
curriculum.
X
b Assessment results in the curriculum are analyzed
with appropriate frequency and rigor for
comparable (local, state, and national) groups
outside of the school.
X
AI.4. The assessment of student learning and
performance in the curriculum enables students to
monitor their own learning progress and teachers
to adapt their instruction to students’ specific
learning needs.
X
AI.5. Records of students’ learning and performance are
maintained in the curriculum. X
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 164
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
MSA Indicator of Quality Rating
1 2 3 4
AI.6. Timely and useful evaluative information and
feedback regarding learning in the curriculum is
provided to students and parents (as appropriate).
X
AI.7. Assessment data on student learning are used to
measure the presence or absence of achievement in
the curriculum.
X
AI.8. Assessment data on student learning are used to
identify students needing additional support in the
curriculum.
X
AI.9. Placement/enrolment in courses in the curriculum
is based on a thorough analysis of students’
interests and potential as well as on students' past
performance.
N/A
AI.10. Students in the curriculum are learning and
performing at levels expected, or progress is being
made to raise results accordingly.
X
Stakeholders’ comments to support the ratings:
• All ratings met or exceeded the standard.
C. ROOT CAUSE ANALYSIS
Curriculum Design Issues
Content
Are the skills required for
improvement in student
performance included in the
current curriculum?
X YES NO
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 165
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
Data to support your conclusion:
Archdiocesan guidelines and supplemental
materials are provided by the Office for
Catechetical Formation (i.e. Saints of the Day).
Hypothesis derived from your
conclusion:
Sequence
Are the skills required for
improvement in student
performance scheduled to be
taught before the administration
of the assessment?
X YES NO
Data to support your conclusion: Material is reviewed and retaught. All grades use
the same series and have access to the same
publisher resources and website.
Hypothesis derived from your
conclusion:
Pacing
Are the skills required for
improvement in student
performance given sufficient time
in the current pacing of the
curriculum?
X YES NO
Data to support your conclusion:
Lesson plans and weekly assessments
Format
Are the skills required for
improvement in student
performance taught in a format
consistent with the format in
which they will be tested?
X YES NO
Data to support your conclusion:
Hypothesis derived from your
conclusion:
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 166
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
Curriculum Delivery Issues
Teacher Awareness of Content
Are teachers aware that the skills
required for improvement in
student performance are included
in the current curriculum?
X YES NO
Data to support your conclusion:
Hypothesis derived from your
conclusion:
Teacher Awareness of Sequencing
Are teachers aware that the skills
required for improvement in
student performance are
scheduled to be taught prior to
the administration of the
assessment?
X YES NO
Data to support your conclusion:
Hypothesis derived from your
conclusion:
Teacher Awareness of Pacing
Are teachers spending the
specified time on the skills
required for improvement in
student performance?
X YES NO
Data to support your conclusion:
Hypothesis derived from your
conclusion:
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 167
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
Teacher Awareness of Format
Are teachers aware of the
assessment objectives and the
format in which the skills required
for improvement in student
performance will be tested?
X YES NO
Data to support your conclusion:
Hypothesis derived from your
conclusion:
Teacher Resources
Do teachers have the resources
they will need to provide initial
instruction and supplementary or
remedial instruction and
formative assessment of the skills
required for improvement in
student performance?
X YES NO
Data to support your conclusion:
Hypothesis derived from your
conclusion:
Teacher Skills
Do teachers have the professional
knowledge and skills to teach
students the skills required for
improvement in student
performance?
X YES NO
Data to support your conclusion:
Teachers are required to attain Catechetical
certification and annual updates.
Hypothesis derived from your
conclusion:
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 168
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
C.1 Describe any improvements related to this component of the educational
program made within the past five years.
Implemented a Pre-Kindergarten program that follows the Archdiocesan
guidelines for Religion.
Encouragement to attend daily Mass has increased.
C.2 List the significant strengths of the school in this component of the
educational program.
Use of technology including Holy Heroes, Stump the Shepherd, and cross-
curricular activities, including Art and Music.
C.3 List the significant areas for improvement of the school in this component of
the educational program.
Increased faculty modeling of reverence and participation during school prayer
time.
Increased student reverence and participation during school prayer time.
C.4 Based on the strengths and areas for improvement identified, list any important
next steps or strategic priorities related to this component of the educational
program that should be included in the action plans in the Plan for Growth and
Improvement.
Raise awareness among faculty and staff of the importance of modeling
reverence and participation.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 169
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
SELF-ASSESSMENT OF THE INDICATORS OF
QUALITY FOR CURRICULUM, INSTRUCTION, AND
ASSESSMENT IN THE
English Language Arts - Writing
COMPONENT OF THE EDUCATION PROGRAM
The self-assessment of the degree to which this component of the school's education
program meets the Indicators of Quality for Curriculum, Instruction, and Assessment
was conducted by the following process:
X A subcommittee comprised of the following individuals:
Committee Member’s Name Role in the School’s Community (e.g. teacher,
parent, student, etc.)
Ann McCauley Kindergarten teacher
Marsha Kotanchik Grade 1 teacher
Kristen Fazzini Grade 1 teacher
Meredith DeMuth Grade 2 teacher
Geri Eberhardt Grade 3 teacher
Charlotte Bigley Grade 4 teacher
Sister Hannah Miller Grade 4 teacher
Abigail Scogna Grade 5 teacher
Linda Sharpless Grade 6 teacher
Karen McDonald Grade 6 teacher
Susan Heavens Grade 7 teacher
Michelle Mattioni Grade 7 teacher
Mary Welsh Honors Math teacher
Theresa Ducassoux Music/Band teacher
**NOTE: Committee size and composition may vary depending upon the school’s size, the
topic to be addressed, etc. If needed, add lines to the above chart.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 170
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
If the school used a committee to conduct the self-assessment, explain how all of the
school’s community of stakeholders was given opportunities to provide input into
the self-assessment.
At the end of the 2013-2014 School year, faculty and administration were asked to make
a determination for curricular areas in regards to the self-study. Along with Religion,
Science and ELA were the areas picked to examine. Members of the Writing Committee
filled out the Indicators of Quality for Curriculum. The goal is to prepare students to be
21st Century learners, equipped with the skills necessary to succeed. The results were
shared with faculty at a February 2015 faculty meeting.
X Survey of the school’s stakeholders using the Middle States Survey:
Total Number of Surveys Returned 471
The results represent surveys completed by:
Students X
Parents X
Faculty and Staff X
Administrators X
A. ISSUES RELATED TO THE INDICATORS OF QUALITY
The following requirements ask the school system to provide a self-assessment of
expectations for quality for curriculum, instruction, and assessment in this component
of the school's educational program. The information and data requested in this section
are not for evaluation purposes. Instead, the information and data will assist the system
in making the determination whether it meets the Standard and its Indicators of
Quality.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 171
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
1. CURRICULAR COMPONENT SUMMARY: On the chart below, summarize the
course/program offerings for this component of the education program by completing each
column as described.
Grade Level: ELA is taught at all grade levels – Kindergarten through
Grade 8
Course Title: Reading, Writing, Language, Speaking, Listening, Media,
Technology (Please refer to the Archdiocesan Curriculum
guidelines for very specific information regarding the ELA
course of study.)
Key Points in English Language Arts
Reading
The standards establish a “staircase” of increasing complexity in what students
must be able to read so that all students are ready for the demands of college-
and career-level reading no later than the end of high school. The standards also
require the progressive development of reading comprehension so that students
advancing through the grades are able to gain more from whatever they read.
Through reading a diverse array of classic and contemporary literature as well as
challenging informational texts in a range of subjects, students are expected to
build knowledge, gain insights, explore possibilities and broaden their
perspective. While the standards are building blocks for successful classrooms, it
was acknowledged that teachers, school districts and states need to decide on
appropriate curriculum. As a result, reading lists were intentionally not offered.
Instead, numerous sample texts were presented to help teachers prepare for the
school year and to provide expectations for parents and students.
The standards mandate certain critical types of content for all students, including
classic myths and stories from around the world, foundational U.S. documents,
seminal works of American literature and the writings of Shakespeare. The
standards appropriately defer the many remaining decisions about what and
how to teach to states, districts, and schools.
Writing
The ability to write logical arguments based on substantive claims, sound
reasoning and relevant evidence is a cornerstone of the writing standards, with
opinion writing---a basic form of argument---extending down into the earliest
grades.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 172
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
Research---both short, focused projects (such as those commonly required in the
workplace) and longer term in depth research---is emphasized throughout the
standards but most prominently in the writing strand since a written analysis
and presentation of findings is so often critical.
Annotated samples of student writing accompany the standards and help
establish adequate performance levels in writing arguments,
informational/explanatory texts, and narratives in the various grades.
Speaking and Listening
The standards require that students gain, evaluate, and present increasingly
complex information, ideas and evidence through listening and speaking as well
as through media. An important focus of the speaking and listening standards is
academic discussion in one-on-one, small-group and whole-class settings.
Formal presentations are one important way such talk occurs, but so is the more
informal discussion that takes place as students collaborate to answer questions,
build understanding and solve problems.
Language
The standards expect that students will grow their vocabularies through a mix of
conversations, direct instruction and reading. The standards will help students
determine word meanings, appreciate the nuances of words, and steadily expand
their repertoire of words and phrases. The standards help prepare students for
real life experience at college and in 21st century careers. The standards
recognize that students must be able to use formal English in their writing and
speaking, but that they must also be able to make informed, skillful choices
among the many ways to express themselves through language. Vocabulary and
conventions are treated in their own strand not because skills in these areas
should be handled in isolation but because their use extends across reading,
writing, speaking, and listening.
Media and Technology
Just as media and technology are integrated in school and life in the twenty21st
century, skills related to media use (both critical analysis and production of
media) are integrated throughout the standards.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 173
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
Hours per Week: Indicate the number of hours of instructional time devoted to each program/
course per semester/year.
Grade Level(s)
Course Title
Hours per
Semester/Year
Kindergarten 150
Grade 1 855
Grade 2 855
Grade 3 Course titles/topics are listed specifically 710
Grade 4 In the above chart. 710
Grade 5 460
Grade 6 460
Grade 7 460
Grade 8 460
X The instructional hours are reported for one academic week.
2. Describe any gaps or omissions in the sequences of courses taught in this
component of the educational program. Provide a description of proposed
improvements and/or corrective actions that need to be taken. Include a
description of actions that have been initiated or are formally planned.
The Archdiocese of Philadelphia and the PA State Department of Education
administer curriculum guidelines and common core standards that are used in all
curriculum areas and at all grade levels. Teaching and planning is developed from
these guidelines. Therefore, no gaps or omissions in the sequence of the ELA
program exist.
3. Describe any unnecessary repetitions in the sequences of courses taught in this
component of the educational program. Provide a description of proposed
improvements and/or corrective actions that need to be taken. Include a
description of actions that have been initiated or are formally planned.
There are no unnecessary repetitions in the sequence of courses.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 174
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
4. ASSESSMENT RESULTS:
Name of Assessment/
Test Area(s) Assessed
Level of Student
Performance
S NI U
School-based Assessments
Reading, Writing,
Speaking, Listening,
Language
X
End-of-the-Year
Assessments
Reading, Writing,
Speaking, listening,
Language
X
Standardized Assessments Reading, Writing,
Listening, Language X
Projects
Reading, Writing,
speaking, Listening,
Language
X
B. SELF-ASSESSMENT OF THE INDICATORS OF
QUALITY
The Indicators of Quality for Curriculum, Instruction and Assessment identify the
types of evidence that, when taken together, indicate whether the school meets the
expectations for quality in its educational program.
Rating of Adherence to the Indicator
1. Does Not Meet The evidence indicates the school system does not meet
the expectations of this Indicator
2. Partially Meets/In
Need of Improvement
The evidence indicates that the school system partially
meets the expectations of this Indicator and is in need of
improvement
3. Meets The evidence indicates the school system meets the
expectations of this Indicator
4. Exceeds The evidence indicates the school system exceeds the
expectations of this Indicator
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 175
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
INDICATORS OF QUALITY FOR CURRICULUM
Indicators for All Schools
MSA Indicator of Quality Rating
1 2 3 4
CI.1. The development of the curriculum is based on a
thorough assessment of the basic concepts, skills,
and knowledge required of all students to fulfill the
stated goals of the program.
X
CI.2.The curriculum has established priorities, objectives,
and goals for all courses and units within the
program that are based on clearly defined
expectations for all students.
X
CI.3. The curriculum is designed to ensure the alignment
of teaching strategies, learning activities,
instructional support, instructional resources, and
assessment.
X
CI.4. The curriculum defines desired student outcomes
as expressed in terms of student understanding,
knowledge, attitudes, skills, and habits.
X
CI.5. The curriculum provides experiences that promote
students’ critical thinking, reasoning, problem-
solving skills, and study skills.
X
CI.6. The learning expectations of the curriculum address
the diverse learning needs of the students without
compromising the essential knowledge and skills
students are expected to learn.
X
CI.7. Course objectives in the curriculum are simply
stated and understandable to students. X
CI.8. The skills and knowledge of the curriculum are
well-articulated and coordinated between all
teachers at each grade level and by teachers across
grade levels.
X
CI.9. Elementary, middle level, and secondary level staff
members work cooperatively to provide a
meaningful and logical progression of learning
activities in the curriculum.
X
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 176
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
MSA Indicator of Quality Rating
1 2 3 4
CI.10. The curriculum is designed to foster active
involvement of students in the learning process. X
CI.11. Instructional activities in the curriculum provide
opportunities for both exploration and
specialization in the content.
X
CI.12. The curriculum’s objectives and expectations for
learning are understood and supported by the
school community’s stakeholders.
X
CI.13. Parents and students are provided appropriate
opportunities to provide input into the
development of curriculum.
X
CI.14. Written curriculum guides identify objectives and
define the scope and sequence of the curriculum.
The guides are functional and in use.
X
CI.15. Learning materials used in the curriculum are
current and are selected to fulfill the goals and
objectives of the curriculum.
X
CI.16. Current best practices in, including the use of
technology and other media, are considered in the
selection of learning materials and media.
X
CI.17. Decisions made regarding the curriculum are
based on data about student performance,
knowledge about organizational development, and
research about best practices in curriculum,
instruction, and assessment.
X
CI.18. The content and instructional activities in the
curriculum are consistent with the school’s
philosophy/mission.
X
CI.19. Administrative leadership and support are
provided in the coordination and articulation of the
curriculum.
X
CI.20. The curriculum is reviewed and evaluated
regularly and systematically. The curriculum
review/evaluation process includes safeguards to
ensure that the written curriculum is actually
taught. The review process focuses on what is to be
X
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 177
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
MSA Indicator of Quality Rating
1 2 3 4
deleted from the curriculum as well as what is to be
added.
Stakeholders’ comments to support the ratings:
Stakeholders’ comments focused on a lack of connection between the lower and
upper grades and the need for more technology to be integrated into the
curriculum.
Parents and students are not involved in curriculum development.
Evidence:
Indicator
No. Evidence
CI.8
Time has not been made available during Faculty meetings for
coordination across grade level. There have not been sufficient Faculty
meetings scheduled.
CI.9
Time has not been made available during Faculty meetings for
coordination across grade level. There have not been sufficient Faculty
meetings scheduled.
CI.13
While we follow the curriculum provided by the Archdiocese, we have not
adequately utilized the talents of parents or addressed the interest of
students.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 178
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
INDICATORS OF QUALITY FOR INSTRUCTION
Indicators for All Schools
MSA Indicator of Quality Rating
1 2 3 4
II.1. A variety of teaching strategies and techniques is
used to meet the needs of individual students in the
curriculum.
X
II.2. The scope and pacing of lessons in the curriculum
are appropriate for the students. X
II.3. Provision is made for appropriate amounts of
learning time for all aspects of the curriculum. X
II.4. Students are provided with additional assistance to
address specific learning challenges in the
curriculum when needed.
X
II.5. Students and teachers demonstrate mutual respect
toward each other in classes. X
II.6. Students demonstrate an understanding of cultural
differences by maintaining respect for each other in
classes.
X
II.7. Class sizes in promote and allow for varied
instructional strategies to be used. X
II.8. Meaningful and frequent communications with
parents are used to promote student learning in the
curriculum.
X
II.9. Members of the faculty are qualified, competent, and
dedicated to the objectives of the curriculum. X
II.10. Members of the faculty maintain safe, positive, and
supportive classroom environments. X
II.11.The faculty is provided with continuing
professional growth activities that support the
effective fulfillment of curriculum objectives.
Support for effective use of research-based
instructional practices is provided to teachers.
X
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 179
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
Stakeholders’ comments to support the ratings:
Teachers use a variety of teaching methods in order to meet the needs of individual
students
More professional growth activities to support the fulfillment of curriculum
objectives are needed.
Evidence:
Indicator
No. Evidence
N/A A rating of 1 was not received in any of the Indicators of Quality for
Instruction
INDICATORS OF QUALITY FOR ASSESSMENT
Indicators for All Schools
MSA Indicator of Quality Rating
1 2 3 4
AI.1. Assessment of student learning and performance is
aligned with curriculum and instruction in the
curriculum
X
AI.2. A variety of methods for assessing student learning
is used in the curriculum. X
AI.3. Assessment results in the curriculum are analyzed
with appropriate frequency and rigor for
individual students as they move through courses
in the curriculum.
X
b. Assessment results in the curriculum are analyzed
with appropriate frequency and rigor for cohorts
of students as they move through courses in the
curriculum.
X
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 180
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
MSA Indicator of Quality Rating
1 2 3 4
b Assessment results in the curriculum are analyzed
with appropriate frequency and rigor for
comparable (local, state, and national) groups
outside of the school.
X
AI.4. The assessment of student learning and
performance in the curriculum enables students to
monitor their own learning progress and teachers
to adapt their instruction to students’ specific
learning needs.
X
AI.5. Records of students’ learning and performance are
maintained in the curriculum. X
AI.6. Timely and useful evaluative information and
feedback regarding learning in the curriculum is
provided to students and parents (as appropriate).
X
AI.7. Assessment data on student learning are used to
measure the presence or absence of achievement in
the curriculum.
X
AI.8. Assessment data on student learning are used to
identify students needing additional support in the
curriculum.
X
AI.9. Placement/enrolment in courses in the curriculum
is based on a thorough analysis of students’
interests and potential as well as on students' past
performance.
X
AI.10. Students in the curriculum are learning and
performing at levels expected, or progress is being
made to raise results accordingly.
X
Stakeholders’ comments to support the ratings:
Integrating more technology into the classroom and curriculum would benefit
students and sustain an updated learning environment.
Foreign language classes should be offered throughout Grades K - 8.
After school clubs and time to receive additional support in subject areas would
help students to challenge and improve their academic level.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 181
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
Evidence:
Indicator
No. Evidence
N/A A rating of 1 was not received in any of the Indicators of Quality for
Instruction
C. ROOT CAUSE ANALYSIS
Curriculum Design Issues
Content
Are the skills required for
improvement in student
performance included in the
current curriculum?
X YES NO
Data to support your conclusion:
Our teachers follow the CCSS provided by OCE.
Our reading series is aligned to the CCSS, as well
as the curriculum guidelines.
Hypothesis derived from your
conclusion:
As teachers follow the guidelines and standards
and communicate across grade levels, skills and
knowledge will be well-articulated and
coordinated.
Sequence
Are the skills required for
improvement in student
performance scheduled to be
taught before the administration
of the assessment?
X YES NO
Data to support your conclusion: Professional teaching requires that all skills and
concepts be taught before all assessments are
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 182
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
administered.
Hypothesis derived from your
conclusion:
When teachers thoroughly teach skills and
concepts before assessing students, positive
outcomes will result.
Pacing
Are the skills required for
improvement in student
performance given sufficient time
in the current pacing of the
curriculum?
YES X NO
Data to support your conclusion:
There is not enough time given in each unit for
skills to be fully mastered.
Format
Are the skills required for
improvement in student
performance taught in a format
consistent with the format in
which they will be tested?
X YES NO
Data to support your conclusion:
Teachers use Common Core aligned materials to
teach and assess their students.
Hypothesis derived from your
conclusion:
When teachers use the materials provided to
them, and assess using those same materials,
students will be successful.
Curriculum Delivery Issues
Teacher Awareness of Content
Are teachers aware that the skills
required for improvement in
student performance are included
in the current curriculum?
X YES NO
Data to support your conclusion:
All teachers have a copy of the CCSS and
curriculum guidelines.
Hypothesis derived from your
conclusion:
As teachers utilize their awareness of the skills
included in the curriculum, improvement in
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 183
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
student performance will result.
Teacher Awareness of Sequencing
Are teachers aware that the skills
required for improvement in
student performance are
scheduled to be taught prior to the
administration of the assessment?
X YES NO
Data to support your conclusion:
It is common teaching practice, implemented by
faculty, to teach skills before assessing them.
Hypothesis derived from your
conclusion:
When teachers teach skills before assessing
students, performance will improve.
Teacher Awareness of Pacing
Are teachers spending the
specified time on the skills
required for improvement in
student performance?
X YES NO
Data to support your conclusion:
Teachers follow the guidelines put forth in their
reading series for pacing.
Hypothesis derived from your
conclusion:
As teachers follow the guidelines for pacing in
their texts, student performance will improve.
Teacher Awareness of Format
Are teachers aware of the
assessment objectives and the
format in which the skills required
for improvement in student
performance will be tested?
X YES NO
Data to support your conclusion:
Teachers follow the guidelines put forth in their
reading series for objectives and formats for
teaching skills.
Hypothesis derived from your
conclusion:
When teachers examine their reading texts and
follow the objectives and format provided,
student improvement will result.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 184
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
Teacher Resources
Do teachers have the resources
they will need to provide initial
instruction and supplementary or
remedial instruction and
formative assessment of the skills
required for improvement in
student performance?
X YES NO
Data to support your conclusion:
Teachers are provided with the necessary
materials needed to provide instruction and
assessment.
Hypothesis derived from your
conclusion:
As teachers use the provided materials,
instruction and assessment will take place.
Teacher Skills
Do teachers have the professional
knowledge and skills to teach
students the skills required for
improvement in student
performance?
X YES NO
Data to support your conclusion:
All teachers have the necessary knowledge and
skills.
Hypothesis derived from your
conclusion:
When teachers use their knowledge and skills,
improvement in student performance will result.
C.1 Describe any improvements related to this component of the educational
program made within the past five years.
All grade levels are currently using the Writing Process when teaching and
applying writing in all subject areas.
Grammar workbooks and Reading series have been updated to better support
the writing process.
The implementation of SMART boards and technology in the classrooms has
enhanced the teaching of writing in the classroom.
Implementation of the Common Core State Standards has increased the focus of
writing in the classroom.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 185
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
C.2 List the significant strengths of the school in this component of the
educational program.
Since implementing the CCSS, each genre of writing is taught across grade levels,
such as Persuasive, Narrative, etc.
Student writing pieces are displayed throughout the school.
Writing occurs across the curricular areas.
Collaborative efforts are made among the faculty to share ideas and streamline
the writing process.
C.3 List the significant areas for improvement of the school in this component of
the educational program.
More support is needed for struggling readers and writers.
Consistent expectations need to be expressed through rubrics.
C.4 Based on the strengths and areas for improvement identified, list any important
next steps or strategic priorities related to this component of the educational
program that should be included in the action plans in the Plan for Growth and
Improvement.
The steps for the writing process will be displayed in classrooms.
Meetings among grade level teachers to establish consistent terminology for the
writing process will occur, and these terms will be distributed to the faculty.
A file will be created on the Server in the Teacher Share Folder for teachers to
post rubrics for sharing.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 186
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
SELF-ASSESSMENT OF THE INDICATORS OF
QUALITY FOR CURRICULUM, INSTRUCTION, AND
ASSESSMENT IN THE
Science
COMPONENT OF THE EDUCATION PROGRAM
The self-assessment of the degree to which this component of the school's education
program meets the Indicators of Quality for Curriculum, Instruction, and Assessment
was conducted by the following process:
X A subcommittee comprised of the following individuals:
Committee Member’s Name Role in the School’s Community (e.g. teacher,
parent, student, etc.)
Mrs. Susan Brunner Teacher – Grade 7
Mrs. Bernadette Louden Teacher – Grade 8
Sr. Catherine Masino Principal
Mrs. Jane Brennan Teacher – Grade 3
Mrs. Kelly Myers Teacher – Grade 4
Mrs. Jackie Dale Teacher – Kindergarten
Mrs. Kathy Mullen Teacher – Grade 5
Ms. Heather Leen Teacher – Grade 1
Ms. Lisa Marciano Teacher – Grade 2
Mrs. Julie Leimkuhler Teacher – Physical Education
**NOTE: Committee size and composition may vary depending upon the school’s size, the
topic to be addressed, etc. If needed, add lines to the above chart.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 187
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
If the school used a committee to conduct the self-assessment, explain how all of the
school’s community of stakeholders was given opportunities to provide input into
the self-assessment.
At the end of the 2013-2014 school year, faculty and administration were asked to make
a determination for curricular areas in regards to the self-study. Along with Religion,
Science and ELA were the areas picked to examine. Members of the Science Committee
filled out the Indicators of Quality for Curriculum. The goal is to prepare students to be
21st Century learners equipped with the skills necessary to succeed. The results were
shared with faculty at a February 2015 faculty meeting.
X Survey of the school’s stakeholders using the Middle States Survey:
Total Number of Surveys Returned 471
The results represent surveys completed by:
Students X
Parents X
Faculty and Staff X
Administrators X
A. ISSUES RELATED TO THE INDICATORS OF QUALITY
The following requirements ask the school system to provide a self-assessment of
expectations for quality for curriculum, instruction, and assessment in this component
of the school's educational program. The information and data requested in this section
are not for evaluation purposes. Instead, the information and data will assist the system
in making the determination whether it meets the Standard and its Indicators of
Quality.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 188
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
1. CURRICULAR COMPONENT SUMMARY: On the chart below, summarize the
course/program offerings for this component of the education program by completing each
column as described.
Grade Level: Science is taught at all grade levels – Kindergarten through
Grade 8.
Course Title: Saint Joseph School uses LabLearner as their Science
curriculum.
LabLearner Science Curriculum
LabLearner™ is a 100% research-based, hands-on system of PreK-8 science education
that includes a fully equipped in-school laboratory, complete curriculum including all
assessments, on-line parent and teacher resources, and teacher professional
development. Developed by Cognitive Learning Systems (CLS) in conjunction with
practicing scientists and educators, LabLearner incorporates the latest in brain research
and classroom practice into a program that teaches students science in a way they can
truly understand and enjoy. Students in the LabLearner Program engage in hands-on
experiments performed in a laboratory setting as well as in lessons integrated into their
classroom. Experiments and classroom lessons use metacognitive tools that prompt
students to use numerous learning and thinking strategies.
The LabLearner curriculum was written around basic scientific concepts. These
concepts were identified after careful research and focus group work with classroom
teachers, practicing curriculum developers, and practicing scientists in all the basic
scientific disciplines. The scientific concepts are strategically readdressed throughout
the K-8 experience.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 189
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
Hours per Semester/Year: Indicate the number of hours of instructional time devoted to each
program/ course per semester/year.
Grade Level(s)
Course Title
Hours per
Week
Kindergarten 60
1 45
2 45
3 Course titles, topics are listed specifically 150
4 in the above chart 150
5 220
6 220
7 220
8 220
X The instructional hours are reported for one academic week.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 190
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
2. Describe any gaps or omissions in the sequences of courses taught in this
component of the educational program. Provide a description of proposed
improvements and/or corrective actions that need to be taken. Include a
description of actions that have been initiated or are formally planned.
We are in the process of transitioning from the traditional Archdiocesan science
program to the LabLearner program. As a result, there will be gaps in the science
curriculum and skills. The teachers will address the gaps in skills and content as
they arise.
3. Describe any unnecessary repetitions in the sequences of courses taught in this
component of the educational program. Provide a description of proposed
improvements and/or corrective actions that need to be taken. Include a
description of actions that have been initiated or are formally planned.
With the full implementation of Lab Learner, there will be no unnecessary
repetitions in sequences of the courses taught in our educational program.
4. ASSESSMENT RESULTS:
Name of Assessment/
Test Area(s) Assessed
Level of Student
Performance
S NI U
Teacher designed
assessments
All areas of the Science
Curriculum X
Program generated
assessments
All areas of the Science
Curriculum X
Science lab investigation Scientific, Problem Based
Inquiry X
Standardized tests All areas of the Science
Curriculum X
Science Fair Exhibits All areas of the Science
Curriculum X
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 191
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
4.a. Provide a description of proposed improvements and/or corrective actions that
need to be taken if a rating of “Needs Improvement” or “Unsatisfactory” is
assigned. Include a description of actions that have been initiated or are
formally planned.
Implementation of LabLearner Program 2014- 2015 school year
Consistent instruction across all levels
Weekly use of Science Lab
B. SELF-ASSESSMENT OF THE INDICATORS OF
QUALITY
The Indicators of Quality for Curriculum, Instruction and Assessment identify the
types of evidence that, when taken together, indicate whether the school meets the
expectations for quality in its educational program.
Rating of Adherence to the Indicator
1. Does Not Meet The evidence indicates the school system does not meet
the expectations of this Indicator
2. Partially Meets/In
Need of Improvement
The evidence indicates that the school system partially
meets the expectations of this Indicator and is in need of
improvement
3. Meets The evidence indicates the school system meets the
expectations of this Indicator
4. Exceeds The evidence indicates the school system exceeds the
expectations of this Indicator
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 192
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
INDICATORS OF QUALITY FOR CURRICULUM
Indicators for All Schools
MSA Indicator of Quality Rating
1 2 3 4
CI.1. The development of the curriculum is based on a
thorough assessment of the basic concepts, skills,
and knowledge required of all students to fulfill the
stated goals of the program.
X
CI.2.The curriculum has established priorities, objectives,
and goals for all courses and units within the
program that are based on clearly defined
expectations for all students.
X
CI.3. The curriculum is designed to ensure the alignment
of teaching strategies, learning activities,
instructional support, instructional resources, and
assessment.
X
CI.4. The curriculum defines desired student outcomes
as expressed in terms of student understanding,
knowledge, attitudes, skills, and habits.
X
CI.5. The curriculum provides experiences that promote
students’ critical thinking, reasoning, problem-
solving skills, and study skills.
X
CI.6. The learning expectations of the curriculum address
the diverse learning needs of the students without
compromising the essential knowledge and skills
students are expected to learn.
X
CI.7. Course objectives in the curriculum are simply
stated and understandable to students. X
CI.8. The skills and knowledge of the curriculum are
well-articulated and coordinated between all
teachers at each grade level and by teachers across
grade levels.
X
CI.9. Elementary, middle level, and secondary level staff
members work cooperatively to provide a
meaningful, and logical progression of learning
activities in the curriculum.
X
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 193
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
MSA Indicator of Quality Rating
1 2 3 4
CI.10. The curriculum is designed to foster active
involvement of students in the learning process. X
CI.11. Instructional activities in the curriculum provide
opportunities for both exploration and
specialization in the content.
X
CI.12. The curriculum’s objectives and expectations for
learning are understood and supported by the
school community’s stakeholders.
X
CI.13. Parents and students are provided appropriate
opportunities to provide input into the
development of curriculum.
X
CI.14. Written curriculum guides identify objectives and
define the scope and sequence of the curriculum.
The guides are functional and in use.
X
CI.15. Learning materials used in the curriculum are
current and are selected to fulfill the goals and
objectives of the curriculum.
X
CI.16. Current best practices in, including the use of
technology and other media, are considered in the
selection of learning materials and media.
X
CI.17. Decisions made regarding the curriculum are
based on data about student performance,
knowledge about organizational development, and
research about best practices in curriculum,
instruction, and assessment.
X
CI.18. The content and instructional activities in the
curriculum are consistent with the school’s
philosophy/mission.
X
CI.19. Administrative leadership and support are
provided in the coordination and articulation of the
curriculum.
X
CI.20. The curriculum is reviewed and evaluated
regularly and systematically. The curriculum
review/evaluation process includes safeguards to
ensure that the written curriculum is actually
taught. The review process focuses on what is to be
X
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 194
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
MSA Indicator of Quality Rating
1 2 3 4
deleted from the curriculum as well as what is to be
added.
Stakeholders’ comments to support the ratings:
Stakeholder’s comments revolved around communication and organization of the
curriculum at all grade levels. With the implementation of LabLearner these are
currently being addressed.
Evidence:
INDICATORS OF QUALITY FOR INSTRUCTION
Indicators for All Schools
MSA Indicator of Quality Rating
1 2 3 4
II.1. A variety of teaching strategies and techniques is
used to meet the needs of individual students in the
curriculum.
X
Indicator
No. Evidence
C.I. 8
Time has not been made available during Faculty meetings for coordination
across grade level. There have not been sufficient Faculty meetings
scheduled.
C.I. 9
Time has not been made available during Faculty meetings for coordination
across grade level. There have not been sufficient Faculty meetings
scheduled.
C.I. 13
While we follow the curriculum provided by the Archdiocese, we have not
adequately utilized the talents of parents or addressed the interest of
students.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 195
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
MSA Indicator of Quality Rating
1 2 3 4
II.2. The scope and pacing of lessons in the curriculum
are appropriate for the students. X
II.3. Provision is made for appropriate amounts of
learning time for all aspects of the curriculum. X
II.4. Students are provided with additional assistance to
address specific learning challenges in the
curriculum when needed.
X
II.5. Students and teachers demonstrate mutual respect
toward each other in classes. X
II.6. Students demonstrate an understanding of cultural
differences by maintaining respect for each other in
classes.
X
II.7. Class sizes in promote and allow for varied
instructional strategies to be used. X
II.8. Meaningful and frequent communications with
parents are used to promote student learning in the
curriculum.
X
II.9. Members of the faculty are qualified, competent, and
dedicated to the objectives of the curriculum. X
II.10. Members of the faculty maintain safe, positive, and
supportive classroom environments. X
II.11.The faculty is provided with continuing
professional growth activities that support the
effective fulfillment of curriculum objectives.
Support for effective use of research-based
instructional practices is provided to teachers.
X
Stakeholders’ comments to support the ratings:
Parents need to be better informed about the curriculum.
Encourage parents to visit the school, teacher and textbook websites.
More professional development is needed.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 196
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
Evidence:
Indicator
No. Evidence
N/A A rating of 1 was not received in any of the Indicators of Quality for
Instruction
INDICATORS OF QUALITY FOR ASSESSMENT
Indicators for All Schools
MSA Indicator of Quality Rating
1 2 3 4
AI.1. Assessment of student learning and performance is
aligned with curriculum and instruction in the
curriculum
X
AI.2. A variety of methods for assessing student learning
is used in the curriculum. X
AI.3. Assessment results in the curriculum are analyzed
with appropriate frequency and rigor for
individual students as they move through courses
in the curriculum.
X
c. Assessment results in the curriculum are analyzed
with appropriate frequency and rigor for cohorts
of students as they move through courses in the
curriculum.
X
b. Assessment results in the curriculum are analyzed
with appropriate frequency and rigor for
comparable (local, state, and national) groups
outside of the school.
X
AI.4. The assessment of student learning and
performance in the curriculum enables students to
monitor their own learning progress and teachers
to adapt their instruction to students’ specific
learning needs.
X
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 197
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
MSA Indicator of Quality Rating
1 2 3 4
AI.5. Records of students’ learning and performance are
maintained in the curriculum. X
AI.6. Timely and useful evaluative information and
feedback regarding learning in the curriculum is
provided to students and parents (as appropriate).
X
AI.7. Assessment data on student learning are used to
measure the presence or absence of achievement in
the curriculum.
X
AI.8. Assessment data on student learning are used to
identify students needing additional support in the
curriculum.
X
AI.9. Placement/enrollment in courses in the curriculum
is based on a thorough analysis of students’
interests and potential as well as on students' past
performance.
X
AI.10. Students in the curriculum are learning and
performing at levels expected, or progress is being
made to raise results accordingly.
X
Stakeholders’ comments to support the ratings:
Standardized test results need to be distributed in a timely manner.
Results need to be reviewed by faculty members upon receipt.
Time should be dedicated at the final and opening faculty meetings to analyze and
review data.
Evidence:
Indicator
No. Evidence
N/A A rating of 1 was not received in any of the Indicators of Quality for
Assessment.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 198
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
C. ROOT CAUSE ANALYSIS
Curriculum Design Issues
Content
Are the skills required for
improvement in student
performance included in the
current curriculum?
X YES NO
Data to support your conclusion:
The LabLearner program was implemented in the
fall of 2014 to provide skills necessary for
improvement.
Hypothesis derived from your
conclusion:
As the LabLearner program is implemented
student performance will improve.
Sequence
Are the skills required for
improvement in student
performance scheduled to be
taught before the administration
of the assessment?
X YES NO
Data to support your conclusion: Pre-test, Power Point presentation, and laboratory
investigations are performed before assessment.
Hypothesis derived from your
conclusion:
Student performance will improve will improve
with the implementation of Pre-test, Power point
presentation, and laboratory investigations
performed before assessment.
Pacing
Are the skills required for
improvement in student
performance given sufficient time
in the current pacing of the
curriculum?
X YES NO
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 199
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
Data to support your conclusion:
Implementation of LabLearner program allows for
sufficient time for improvement of student
performance.
Format
Are the skills required for
improvement in student
performance taught in a format
consistent with the format in
which they will be tested?
X YES NO
Data to support your conclusion:
Performance Assessments are drawn from skills
and data developed in the Lab investigations.
Hypothesis derived from your
conclusion:
Continued use of the lab will help students
develop skills needed to be successful on
Performance Assessments.
Curriculum Delivery Issues
Teacher Awareness of Content
Are teachers aware that the skills
required for improvement in
student performance are included
in the current curriculum?
X YES NO
Data to support your conclusion:
LabLearner program provides an in depth
explanation of each cell. Added resources which
include teacher videos, student videos, and
supplemental resources can also be found online at
the LabLearner website.
Hypothesis derived from your
conclusion:
Continued use of LabLearner resources will help
students develop skills needed to be successful in
Science.
Teacher Awareness of Sequencing
Are teachers aware that the skills
required for improvement in
student performance are
scheduled to be taught prior to
X YES NO
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 200
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
the administration of the
assessment?
Data to support your conclusion:
LabLearner program provides an in depth
explanation of skills required to be successful in
each cell. Added resources which include teacher
videos, student videos, Procedural Toolbox, and
Cognitive Toolbox can also be found online at the
LabLearner website.
Hypothesis derived from your
conclusion:
Continued use of LabLearner resources will help
teachers develop skills to successfully teach
Science.
Teacher Awareness of Pacing
Are teachers spending the
specified time on the skills
required for improvement in
student performance?
X YES NO
Data to support your conclusion:
Teachers work as grade level teams to prepare for
each lesson in each Cell. Each teacher spends 3-4
lessons a week so that all skills are thoroughly
covered.
Hypothesis derived from your
conclusion:
Continued grade level team preparation and strict
adherence to LabLearner program will provide
opportunities for teachers to spend time on
Science.
Teacher Awareness of Format
Are teachers aware of the
assessment objectives and the
format in which the skills required
for improvement in student
performance will be tested?
X YES NO
Data to support your conclusion:
LabLearner provides a spiraling curriculum that
includes Grades K-8.
Hypothesis derived from your
conclusion:
As students’ progress through the LabLearner
Program they are provided with opportunities for
Performance Assessment as well as traditional
assessments.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 201
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
Teacher Resources
Do teachers have the resources
they will need to provide initial
instruction and supplementary or
remedial instruction and
formative assessment of the skills
required for improvement in
student performance?
X YES NO
Data to support your conclusion:
The LabLearner program builds on previously
taught skills. The skills are reviewed in the post
lab and revisited the following week in pre-lab.
Hypothesis derived from your
conclusion:
As students’ progress through the program,
resources both supplementary and remedial are
made available through the spiraling curriculum.
Teacher Skills
Do teachers have the professional
knowledge and skills to teach
students the skills required for
improvement in student
performance?
X YES NO
Data to support your conclusion:
LabLearner was a new curriculum introduced in
the fall of 2014. Professional development will
provide teachers with the future necessary skills.
Hypothesis derived from your
conclusion:
Teachers will need to access the background
knowledge as they teach new content through the
program.
C.1 Describe any improvements related to this component of the educational
program made within the past five years.
A new science lab was installed September 2010.
LabLearner curriculum was purchased in September 2014 and incorporated in
Grades Pre-K - 8.
Classes have a scheduled, dedicated lab time once a week.
In 2013, Grade 5 received new text books.
In 2010, Grades 6 and 7 received additional text books.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 202
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
C.2 List the significant strengths of the school in this component of the
educational program.
Teachers provide individual, small group and large group instruction each day.
LabLearner lessons provide hands-on experiences. Learning that can be
transferred to other areas of the curriculum for all students.
Students interact with one another in groups using lab materials; students follow
written lab procedures as well as record and interpret results from investigations
through writing, graphs and lab reports.
Students are able to transfer data into computer class to create electronically
generated graphs and data charts.
Program facilitates a smooth transition in science skills across all grade levels,
from Pre-K through Grade 8.
The program provides a strong math connection through the use of graphs,
calculations and formulas.
Students in Grades 4 - 8 are able to compete in a school science fair and continue
on to Chester County and Delaware Valley Science Fair.
Teachers have demonstrated a strong commitment to implementing the program
and collaborating with each other.
Parent volunteers have generously donated their time and talent to assist
teachers and students in the lab.
C.3 List the significant areas for improvement of the school in this component of
the educational program.
LabLearner identifies objectives and defines the scope and sequence of the
program; however, many teachers are finding it challenging to communicate the
content without prior in-service in curriculum areas.
The curriculum does not entirely align with the required current standardized
tests.
Relative background information, in a student format, is needed in the program.
More authentic teacher-generated assessments within the program are needed.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 203
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
C.4 Based on the strengths and areas for improvement identified, list any important
next steps or strategic priorities related to this component of the educational
program that should be included in the action plans in the Plan for Growth and
Improvement.
Considerations for common planning time to facilitate the alignment of the
science program through Grades K to 8.
In-service and educational opportunities need to be made available for teachers
to further understand the complexities of the curriculum.
Use of text to compliment topics in LabLearner curriculum.
Including standard requirements for answers in LabLearner Student Data Record
across grade levels.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 204
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 205
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
THE PLAN FOR GROWTH AND IMPROVEMENT
he culminating activity of the Excellence by Design self-study and planning
process is the development of a Plan for Growth and Improvement in student
performance and the school’s capacity to produce the levels of student
performance it desires and that are expected by its community of stakeholders.
The heart of the Plan for Growth and Improvement is composed of:
The three, four, or five areas of student performance and organizational capacity
the Planning Team has identified as most in need of growth and improvement,
The measurable objectives that have been developed to address those needs, and
The action plans the school will implement to achieve its objectives.
A. STUDENT PERFORMANCE AND ORGANIZATIONAL
CAPACITY OBJECTIVES
The centerpiece of the school's Plan for Growth and Improvement is formed by the
three, four, or five areas of measurable objectives the school has identified as being the
highest priorities for growth and improvement if the school is to move closer to
achieving its Mission. At least two of the objectives must focus on areas of student
performance that have been determined to be priorities for growth and improvement.
The remaining one, two, or three objectives may be either student performance
objectives and/or objectives focused on growing and improving the school's
organizational capacity to produce the levels of student performance desired and
expected by the school's community of stakeholders. Space is provided below to
evaluate the maximum number of objectives. This limited number of objectives is
suggested so the school can focus on the most critical aspects of student performance
without diverting its energies in too many directions.
To identify these priority areas, the Planning Team asked itself:
What are the gaps between what we say in our Profile of Graduates regarding
what we want our graduates to know, be able to do, and/or what qualities we
want them to demonstrate and our students’ actual performance in those areas?
T
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 206
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
Which of these gaps constitute the highest priorities for narrowing if we are to
move closer over the next seven years to achieving our mission?
Are there areas of our organization's capacity that must be improved in order to
improve our students' performance to the levels we desire and expect
Specifying clear and measurable student performance objectives identifies the school's
commitment to achieve specific end results and thus, is tied directly to accountability.
The objectives must be written in such a way that they outline growth in student
performance for the next seven years and represent a major focus for growth and
improvement in student performance in the school. The objectives should be consistent
with the mission and should extend and define the aim portion of the mission in more
specific detail. Objectives explicate in measurable terms the key end results that the
school seeks to realize from its mission, as expresses in its Profile of Graduates. Not
only should the objectives be related to the school's mission, but where there is also a
district or system plan, the objectives should be linked to one or more of the district’s or
system’s objectives.
The term “student performance” is intended to be defined in the broadest possible
terms. The objectives submitted for accreditation may be focused on any of the
outcomes expected of students as stated in the Profile of Graduates.
A.1. Student Performance Objective #1:
By the year 2022, students of Saint Joseph School will demonstrate an increase in their
faith practices while modeling true discipleship in the community.
A.2 Student Performance Objective #2:
By the year 2022, students will demonstrate an increased understanding of the writing
process across the curriculum, including the progression of appropriate writing skills
from Grades K - 8.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 207
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
A.3 Student Performance Objective #3:
By the year 2022, all students will meet or exceed their anticipated scores as measured
by the Terra Nova Standardized Test at the local level.
A.4 Organizational Capacity Objective #1:
By the year 2022, all teachers will participate in professional development as provided
by the school in Religion, Writing and Science. Additionally, faculty will participate in
at least 15 hours of continuing education per year in other related areas.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 208
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
MIDDLE STATES COMMISSIONS ON
ELEMENTARY AND SECONDARY SCHOOLS
TECHNICAL REVIEW OF OBJECTIVES
Date of Review January 13, 2015
School Name St. Joseph School, Downingtown, PA
Review Number #1
Staff Reviewer Dr. Angela Rufo
Projected Visit Dates April 26 – 29, 2015
Protocol Excellence By Design
Next Steps:
X
Objectives are approved as submitted. This approval denotes that the
objective(s) meet the technical criteria. The Visiting Team will conduct the
Second Level of Review (see the Guide for Self-Study and Accreditation for
the criteria) during the Team’s visit.
Minor modifications recommended. Do not resubmit.
Baseline data needed. Please resubmit when data are available.
Modifications required. Please make changes and resubmit as soon as
possible.
Call me at (610) 696-0939 or email at [email protected] to discuss.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 209
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
General Comments about All Objectives
Yes No
1 Has the school identified three, four, or five objectives for
accreditation purposes? X
Comments:
Yes No
2
Do at least two of the objectives focus on growing and improving
areas of student performance as expressed in the school’s
Mission?
X
Comments:
Technical Review of Student Performance Objectives
Student Performance Objective #1: As submitted by the school: Student Performance Objective #1: Religion
By the year 2022, Saint Joseph School students will demonstrate an increase in their
faith practices while modeling true discipleship in the community as measured by:
1. Student reverence and participation during all school prayer times will increase
by 10%
Baseline Year 2014
Kindergarten 70%
Grade 1 70%
Grade 2 70%
Grade 3 80%
Grade 4 80%
Grade 5 70%
Grade 6 70%
Grade 7 60%
Grade 8 80%
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 210
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
2. The percentage of classes attending weekday Mass twice per month will increase
by 50%
Baseline Year 2014
Kindergarten 0%
Grade 1 0%
Grade 2 33%
Grade 3 66%
Grade 4 33%
Grade 5 66%
Grade 6 66%
Grade 7 33%
Grade 8 33%
3. The percentage of classes completing two service projects per trimester will
increase by 100%
Baseline Year 2014
All grades currently participate in one service project per trimester.
4. Classes spending at least 15 minutes per month in the presence of the Blessed
Sacrament will increase by 100%.
Baseline Year 2014
This will begin with the 2015- 2016 School year.
Student Performance Objective #1: Technical Review Criteria
Yes No
1
Is the objective stated as a desired end result in student
performance? (What do we expect our students to know? What do
we expect them to do with what they know? And/or What
qualities or characteristics do we want them to demonstrate?)
X
Comments:
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 211
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
Yes No
2 Does the objective address expectations for as many of the
school’s students as possible? X
Comments:
Yes No
3 Does the objective relate to culminating expectations for students
at or near the end of their experiences in the school? X
Comments:
Yes No
4
Is the objective related to improvement in an area of academics?
(Note: If none of the student performance objectives relate to
academics, the school needs to be prepared to explain why
academics are not a priority for growth over the next seven years.
X
Comments:
Yes No
5 Is the realization of the objective stated as seven years from the
year of the team’s visit? X
Comments:
Yes No
6
Has the school identified how it will measure progress toward the objective over
the next seven years, i.e.:
1) Have measures been identified to determine achievement
of the objective? X
2) Are baseline data included for each assessment? (MSA
requires that at least one measure has baseline data in place
by the time the team arrives.)
X
3) Is the baseline year in which the data for each assessment
were collected included? X
4) Are challenging and appropriate seven-year performance
targets set for each assessment used to measure achievement
of the objective?
X
Comments:
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 212
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
Yes No
7 Has the school identified multiple forms of assessment to measure
accomplishment of this objective when appropriate and available? X
Comments:
Yes No
8 Is the objective measured by both external and internal
assessments when appropriate and available? X
Comments:
Suggestions for Revising Student Performance Objective #1:
Student Performance Objective #2: As submitted by the school: Student Performance Objective #2: Writing
By the year 2022, Saint Joseph School students will demonstrate an increased
understanding of the writing process across the curriculum, including the progression
of appropriate writing skills from Grades 1-8, as measured by:
1. Students' organization of ideas within a given piece of writing will increase by
5%
Baseline Year: 2014
Grade 1 60%
Grade 2 87%
Grade 3 76%
Grade 4 78%
Grade 5 69%
Grade 6 94%
Grade 7 93%
Grade 8 90%
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 213
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
2. Students will improve their use of beginning and ending sentences within a
paragraph by 5%
Baseline Year: 2014
Grade 1 47%
Grade 2 52%
Grade 3 50%
Grade 4 84%
Grade 5 47%
Grade 6 96%
Grade 7 94%
Grade 8 87%
3. Students will improve sentence fluency within a given piece of writing by 5%
Baseline Year: 2014
Grade 1 40%
Grade 2 80%
Grade 3 50%
Grade 4 61%
Grade 5 65%
Grade 6 96%
Grade 7 93%
Grade 8 95%
4. Students will improve their use of proper conventions within a given
piece of writing by 10%
Baseline Year: 2014
Grade 1 42%
Grade 2 77%
Grade 3 48%
Grade 4 52%
Grade 5 63%
Grade 6 90%
Grade 7 74%
Grade 8 78%
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 214
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
Student Performance Objective #2: Technical Review Criteria
Yes No
1
Is the objective stated as a desired end result in student
performance? (What do we expect our students to know? What do
we expect them to do with what they know? And/or What
qualities or characteristics do we want them to demonstrate?)
X
Comments:
Yes No
2 Does the objective address expectations for as many of the
school’s students as possible? X
Comments:
Yes No
3 Does the objective relate to culminating expectations for students
at or near the end of their experiences in the school? X
Comments:
Yes No
4
Is the objective related to improvement in an area of academics?
(Note: If none of the student performance objectives relate to
academics, the school needs to be prepared to explain why
academics are not a priority for growth over the next seven years.
X
Comments:
Yes No
5 Is the realization of the objective stated as seven years from the
year of the team’s visit? X
Comments:
Yes No
6
Has the school identified how it will measure progress toward the objective over
the next five years, i.e.:
1) Have measures been identified to determine achievement
of the objective? X
2) Are baseline data included for each assessment? (MSA X
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 215
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
Yes No
requires that at least one measure has baseline data in place
by the time the team arrives.)
3) Is the baseline year in which the data for each assessment
were collected included? X
4) Are challenging and appropriate seven-year performance
targets set for each assessment used to measure
achievement of the objective?
X
Comments:
Yes No
7 Has the school identified multiple forms of assessment to measure
accomplishment of this objective when appropriate and available? X
Comments:
Yes No
8 Is the objective measured by both external and internal
assessments when appropriate and available? X
Comments:
Suggestions for Revising Student Performance Objective #2:
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 216
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
Student Performance Objective #3: As submitted by the school: Student Performance Objective #3: Science
By the year 2022, Saint Joseph School students from Grades 1 - 8 will demonstrate
proficiency in science as measured by:
1. The percentage of students proficient or advanced in science lab performance
will increase by 10%
Baseline Year: 2014
Grade 1 47%
Grade 2 54%
Grade 3 67%
Grade 4 85%
Grade 5 77%
Grade 6 51%
Grade 7 45%
Grade 8 71%
2. The mean National Percentile per grade in Terra Nova Science tests will increase
by 5%
Baseline Year: 2014
Grade 1 69%
Grade 2 66%
Grade 3 62%
Grade 4 77%
Grade 5 65%
Grade 6 69%
Grade 7 74%
Grade 8 NA
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 217
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
3. The percentage of students expressing positive attitudes towards science, as
indicated by a science interest survey, will increase by 10%
Baseline Year: 2014
Grade 1 81%
Grade 2 56%
Grade 3 61%
Grade 4 52%
Grade 5 46%
Grade 6 62%
Grade 7 61%
Grade 8 45%
Student Performance Objective #3: Technical Review Criteria
Yes No
1
Is the objective stated as a desired end result in student
performance? (What do we expect our students to know? What do
we expect them to do with what they know? And/or What
qualities or characteristics do we want them to demonstrate?)
X
Comments:
Yes No
2 Does the objective address expectations for as many of the
school’s students as possible? X
Comments:
Yes No
3 Does the objective relate to culminating expectations for students
at or near the end of their experiences in the school? X
Comments:
Yes No
4
Is the objective related to improvement in an area of academics?
(Note: If none of the student performance objectives relate to
academics, the school needs to be prepared to explain why
academics are not a priority for growth over the next seven years.
X
Comments:
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 218
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
Yes No
5 Is the realization of the objective stated as seven years from the
year of the team’s visit? X
Comments:
Yes No
6
Has the school identified how it will measure progress toward the objective over
the next five years, i.e.:
2) Have measures been identified to determine achievement
of the objective? X
2) Are baseline data included for each assessment? (MSA
requires that at least one measure has baseline data in place
by the time the team arrives.)
X
3) Is the baseline year in which the data for each assessment
were collected included? X
4) Are challenging and appropriate seven-year performance
targets set for each assessment used to measure
achievement of the objective?
X
Comments:
Yes No
7 Has the school identified multiple forms of assessment to measure
accomplishment of this objective when appropriate and available? X
Comments:
Yes No
8 Is the objective measured by both external and internal
assessments when appropriate and available? X
Comments:
Suggestions for Revising Student Performance Objective #3:
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 219
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
Technical Review for Organizational Capacity Objectives
Organizational Capacity Objective #1: As submitted by the school:
By the year 2022, teachers will demonstrate increased participation in professional
development as measured by:
Increasing the percentage of time spent in faculty meetings sharing information,
insights, and resources to 20%.
Baseline Year 2014
This will begin with the 2015-2016 school year.
Increasing the number of professional development hours to 6 per year, in
addition to those acquired at general faculty meetings.
Baseline Year 2014
This will begin with the 2015-2016 school year.
Organizational Capacity Objective #1: Technical Review Criteria
Yes No
1
Is the objective stated as a desired end result in organizational
capacity? (What does the school system have to do better or
differently in its programs, services, activities, and/or operations
to produce the levels of student performance desired?)
X
Comments:
Yes No
2
Does the objective address one or more areas addressed by the
Middle States Standards for Accreditation in need of growth
and/or improvement in order for the school system to be able to
achieve the desired levels of student performance?
X
Comments:
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 220
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
Yes No
3 Is the realization of the objective stated as seven years from the
year of the team’s visit? X
Comments:
Yes No
4
Has the school identified how it will measure progress toward the objective over
the next seven years, i.e.:
1) Have measures been identified to determine achievement
of the objective? X
2) Are baseline data included for each measure? (MSA
requires that at least one measure has baseline data in place
by the time the team arrives.)
X
3) Is a baseline year in which the data sets for each assessment
were collected included? X
4) Are challenging and appropriate seven-year performance
targets set for each assessment used to measure
achievement of the objective?
X
Comments:
Yes No
5 Has the school identified multiple forms of assessment to measure
accomplishment of this objective when appropriate and available? X
Comments:
Yes No
6 Is the objective measured by both external and internal
assessments when appropriate and available? X
Comments:
Suggestions for Revising Organizational Capacity Objective #1:
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 221
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
B. ACTION PLANS Action plans describe the methods the school will use to accomplish its mission/philosophy and its performance/capacity
objectives. Action plans provide detailed descriptions of the specific actions required to achieve desired results outlined in
the student performance improvement and organizational capacity objectives. This is the “doing” part of the plan. Action
plans can and should include multiple activities that will engage the school in improvement activities for the next seven
years. Action plans should be specific and tell in detail how the school will accomplish its objectives. Action plans should
relate directly to the objectives, but they also should be related to the mission/philosophy.
Action Plans
ACTION PLAN Objective: By the year 2022, Saint Joseph School will demonstrate an increase in the faith practices of its students
while modeling true discipleship in the community.
Strategy #1: Faculty will further their understanding of fundamental Catholic traditions in order to foster an
increase in reverence and meaningful participation during all school prayer times.
Action Step
Person(s)/Group(s)
Responsible
Timeline
for
Completion
Resources
Needed
Indicators of
Success
Status
1. Faculty retreats
will provide
opportunities for
continual
education.
Religion Coordinators
and committee
School Year
2015-2016
Local retreat
facilities
Attendance
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 222
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
Professional Development Needs for Strategy #1:
1. Provide off-campus retreats.
2. Various workshops addressing Catholic faith, traditions and prayer.
2. All teachers will
model reverence
and
participation.
Faculty School Year
2015
N/A Quiet during
prayer times
In progress
3. Teachers will
pray a variety of
traditional
Catholic prayers
with students.
Faculty School Year
2015
IHM Prayer
Cards
Increased
participation
4. Establish a
faculty Religion
committee
Faculty Spring, 2015 Faculty Committee is
formed
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 223
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
Strategy #2: Students will attend weekday Mass twice per month.
Action Step
Person(s)/Group(s)
Responsible
Timeline for
Completion
Resources
Needed
Indicators of
Success
Status
1. Attend Mass
twice monthly.
Teachers of Grades K - 4*
Teachers of Grades 5 - 8*
*Includes First Friday
Mass
Fall 2015 Church All classes are
attending Mass
during
scheduled times.
2. Discuss with the
Pastor the
availability of the
main church for
9:00 am Mass
Administrators, Religion
Coordinators and Pastor
Spring 2015 Church All classes are
attending 9:00
Mass in the
main church
3. Generate a sign
up calendar.
Religion Coordinators Fall 2015 Calendar Calendar
reflects
attendance
Professional Development Needs for Strategy #2:
1. N/A
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 224
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
Strategy #3: Students will increase service to the parish community by completing two service projects per trimester.
Action Step
Person(s)/Group(s)
Responsible
Timeline for
Completion
Resources
Needed
Indicators of Success
Status
1. Develop a
calendar of
monthly
activities
Grade level teams Fall 2017 Faculty Calendar is developed
2. Contact
priests,
PREP, and
local
community
sources
Grade level teams Fall 2017 Faculty Acknowledgment from
organization
Professional Development Needs for Strategy #3:
1. Teachers will research various organizations that are in need.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 225
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
Strategy #4: Each homeroom will spend at least 15 minutes, monthly, in the presence of the Blessed Sacrament.
Action Step
Person(s)/Group(s)
Responsible
Timeline for
Completion
Resources
Needed
Indicators of
Success
Status
1. Establish a faculty
Religion
committee
Faculty Spring, 2015 Faculty Committee is
formed
2. Create calendar to
document
attendance
Religion Committee Fall 2016 Blank
calendar for
each month
Calendar
completed by
each
homeroom
Professional Development Needs for Strategy #4:
1. Provide off-campus retreats.
2. Various workshops addressing Catholic faith, traditions and prayer.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 226
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
ACTION PLAN
Objective: By the year 2022, students will demonstrate an increased understanding of the writing process across the
curriculum, including the progression of appropriate writing skills from Grades 1 - 8.
Strategy #1: Grade level partners will create a plan to identify how each genre of writing is taught, what projects are
completed, and how they are integrated into each content area.
Action Step
Person(s)/Group(s)
Responsible
Timeline for
Completion
Resources
Needed
Indicators of
Success
Status
1. Meet with grade
partners to
identify types of
genres taught
and projects
completed
within those
genres.
All teachers 1-8 Beginning 2015-
2016 school year
and ongoing
Common
Core
Standards by
grade level
Meetings are
conducted.
Minutes of the
meetings are
maintained and
reported to the rest
of the faculty
2. Share, discuss
and record
strategies used to
teach each genre
and how these
All teachers 1-8 Ongoing
through
meetings and
Teacher Share
Folder on server
Reading
series,
English
series,
various web
Strategies will be
recorded and
distributed among
grade levels.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 227
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
are integrated
into other areas
of the curriculum
sites &
teacher files
3. Meet with fellow
faculty in Grades
K-3, 4 - 5, and 6 -
8 to compare and
coordinate
strategies from
initial grade level
meeting
Teachers from Primary,
Intermediate and Middle
School ELA will meet in
specified levels
Each group will
meet once a
trimester for the
first year, and as
needed going
forward
Grade level
materials
Meetings are
conducted to
coordinate
strategies
discussed at initial
grade level
meetings.
Minutes are
recorded and
distributed among
faculty.
4. Meet with
Grades K-8 to
devise a plan for
streamlining and
integrating the
writing process
across the grades
to maintain
consistency
throughout the
curriculum.
Representatives from
each grade will meet at
the start of the school
year to share progress
from the previous year
Beginning the
school year 2016-
2017 (Year 2 of
implementation)
Materials
from level
meetings for
each grade
All invitees accept
the invitation.
Committee is
formed.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 228
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
Professional Development Needs for Strategy #1:
1. Time is needed for teachers to meet in their respective groups to develop a list of genres taught and the strategies
used.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 229
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
ACTION PLAN
Objective: Objective: By the year 2022, students in Grades 1 - 7 will demonstrate proficiency in science as measured
by:
a. the percentage of students proficient or advanced in science lab performance will increase by 10%;
b. the National Percentile per grade in Terra Nova Science test will increase by 5% ;
c. the percentage of students expressing positive attitudes towards science, as indicated by a science interest survey
will increase by 10%.
Strategy #1: Increase the percent of students who are proficient or advanced in science lab performance
Action Step
Person(s)/Group(s)
Responsible
Timeline for
Completion
Resources Needed
Indicators of
Success
Status
1. Create a rubric to
measure
performance in
science lab
Science Committee 12/1/2014-
1/31/2015
Science teachers
from Grades K - 8
Full data
collected by
1/31/2015
Complete
2. Compile data from
rubrics to form
baseline
Heather Leen
Kathy Mullen
12/1/2014-
1/31/2015
Teachers
Time
Full data
collected by
1/31/2015
Complete
3. Review rubric
periodically and
update
Science Teachers Ongoing Time
Sample rubrics
Science curriculum
Ongoing
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 230
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
4. Create a resource
file of teacher
created rubrics and
assessments
Faculty Ongoing Science teachers for
Grades K - 8
Ongoing
5. Monitor teacher
created and
administered
assessments
Administration
Science Coordinators
Ongoing Administration
Faculty
Ongoing
Professional Development Needs for Strategy #1:
1. Additional LabLearner in-service for further understanding of curriculum
2. In-service focusing on various assessments including rubrics
3. Clearly define the role and responsibility of the Science Coordinator in conjunction with the professional
development objective
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 231
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
Strategy #2: Analyze and review the Terra Nova Science scores for the next 7 years.
Action Step
Person(s)/Group(s)
Responsible
Timeline for
Completion
Resources Needed
Indicators of
Success
Status
1. Establish a Terra
Nova science
baseline score for
grade level 1 and 7.
Science Committee September
2014 to
January 2015
Terra Nova Results
Completion of
baseline scores
Complete
2. Analyze scores in
sub categories to
determine patterns
of weakness
Faculty Ongoing Terra Nova Results
Time
Completion of
score analysis
3. Track Terra Nova
science performance
for all students in
Grades 1 - 7
Science Coordinators
Faculty
End of each
year
Terra Nova Results Tracking
Complete
4. Implement a
comprehensive
science curriculum
across all grades
Science Committee
Faculty
Administration
2022 LabLearner
program and
materials
Completion of
comprehensive
science
curriculum
5. Implement a cross
curricular approach
to assessment
(Science/writing)
Faculty
Teachers of
Science/ELA
Ongoing Interdepartmental
planning time
Improved
responses for
LabLearner
Data Record.
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 232
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
6. In-service on
various forms of
assessments for
content area
subjects
Administration
IU resources (Eileen
Weaver)
Staff members
Ongoing In-service meeting
times
Presenters/resources
for in-service
Varied
assessment
tools used in
content area
subjects
(science)
7. Investigate the Lab
Learner program for
formal and informal
assessments/assess
ment opportunities
Science Teachers (all
grades and levels)
Ongoing Allocated grade
specific and cross
grade meeting times
(monthly)
Improved
proficiency in
areas noted as
weaknesses on
Terra Nova
8. Establish a
committee to
supervise
implementation,
organization and
progress of new
strategies
Administration
establishes a rotating
member committee of
science teachers to
review submitted
science assessments
2015-2016
school year
Bi-monthly meeting
of committee during
school hours(subs
provided)
More authentic
assessments;
A database of
assessment
tools available
to all teachers
in Teacher
Share Folder
Professional Development Needs for Strategy #1:
1. Selection of member committee
2. Time available for analyzing scores
3. Time available for meeting with other teachers
4. Faculty meeting time dedicated to lab learner upkeep and maintenance
5. Time available for science teachers to review submitted science assessments
6. Presenters and resources for in-services
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 233
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
Strategy #3: Evaluate student interest in science at various grade levels through the use of surveys.
Action Step
Person(s)/Group(s)
Responsible
Timeline for
Completion
Resources
Needed
Indicators
of Success
Status
1. Establish a committee
to create/evaluate
interest inventories
Jackie Dale
Julie Leimkuhler
Lisa Marciano
12/1/2014-
1/31/2015
Analyze the data
and numerical
percentages
indicating
findings
-compare data
collected (boys
vs. girls)
Full data
collected by
1/31/2015
Complete
2. Create grade specific
interest inventories for
students(reflective/writ
ten, self-assessment)
Jackie Dale
Julie Leimkuhler
Lisa Marciano
12/1/2014-
1/31/2015
Computer lab
Survey monkey
type system
teachers(5)
administration
System to
analyze data
received
Full data
collected by
1/31/2015
Complete
3. Administer initial
interest survey and
compile baseline data
Jackie Dale
Julie Leimkuhler
Lisa Marciano
Pat Galvin
12/1/2014-
1/31/2015
Science teachers
for each class
grade 1 - 8
Full data
collected by
1/31/2015
Complete
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 234
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
4. Provide opportunities
to demonstrate the
importance of science
and science curriculum
Administrators Faculty Ongoing -Science fairs
-Participation in
Lab Learner
-Science
assemblies
-Outside
resources such
as speakers and
Science
Explorers
-STEM career
day
Ongoing
5. Continue yearly
student interest
inventories
Faculty Ongoing Science teachers
for each class
Grades 1 - 8
Ongoing
Professional Development Needs for Strategy #3:
1. Science in-service focused on increasing awareness of Science among students
2. Additional LabLearner in-service prior to school opening and mid-year
3. In-service focusing on the development of learning in specific grades
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 235
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
ACTION PLAN
Objective: By the year 2022, teachers will demonstrate increased participation in Professional Development as
measured by
Strategy #1: Increasing the percentage of time spent in Faculty meetings sharing information, insights, and
resources to 20%.
Action Step
Person(s)/Group(s)
Responsible
Timeline for
Completion
Resources
Needed
Indicators of
Success
Status
1. Curriculum
coordinators will
be identified
All Faculty members Spring 2015 Policies and
Procedures of
Archdiocese
Coordinators
named
2. Review
responsibilities of
Curriculum Area
Coordinators
All Faculty members Spring 2015 Policies and
Procedures of
Archdiocese
Form
requirement
signature is
returned
3. Curriculum
coordinators will
disseminate
workshop
information
Curriculum Coordinators Spring - Fall
2015
OCE Teacher
Portal,
Office of
Catechetical
Formation,
CCIU, etc.
Workshops
attendance
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 236
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
4. Faculty will
attend outside
workshops
All Faculty members Fall 2015 Professional
Development
Funds &
reimbursements
Certificate of
completion.
5. Schedule teacher
share at Faculty
meetings
Administration Faculty
members
School Year
2015-2016
Time allotted
on agenda
All teachers
share
6. Coordinators and
Administration
meet regularly
Administration
Coordinators
School Year
2015-2016
Funds for
substitutes
Time allotted
for meetings
All meetings
take place.
Professional
Development
Hours
verified
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 237
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
Strategy #2: Increasing the number of Professional Development hours to 6 per year in addition to those acquired at
general Faculty meetings
Action Step
Person(s)/Group(s)
Responsible
Timeline for
Completion
Resources
Needed
Indicators of
Success
Status
1. Establish a
committee to
delineate Faculty
responsibilities
and obligations.
Members appointed by
Principal
Spring 2015 Policies and
procedures of
Archdiocese
Committee
established
and
responsibilities
delegated
2. Inform Faculty of
professional
development
obligations
Principal May 2015
Faculty Meeting
Faculty
meeting
Contract
signature
3. Create an online
tracking system
to record hours
on MSP
Committee members Summer 2015 MSP System is
created
4. Create a template
for reporting
hours back to
Faculty members.
Committee members Summer 2015 Electronic
communication
Computer
skills
Template
created
Excellence by Design (2012) Page 238
Self-Study Document
©2012, Middle States Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools
5. Establish
periodic
reminders of the
status of
Professional
Development
Vice- Principal Fall 2015 Electronic
communication
Academic
Calendar
Reminders
sent
6. Professional
Development
hours will be
included in end
of year formal
evaluation
Administration May – June 2016 Evaluations Evaluation
signed