34
Examining the Relationship of Quality IEPs to Student Progress A Reflective Process to Promote Reasonable Calculations for Educational Benefit 25 Industrial Park Road, Middletown, CT 06457-1520 · (860) 632-1485 Connecticut State Department of Education · Division of Educational Programs and Services January 27, 2006

Examining the Relationship of Quality IEPs to Student Progress A Reflective Process to Promote Reasonable Calculations for Educational Benefit 25 Industrial

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Examining the Relationship of Quality IEPs to Student Progress A Reflective Process to Promote Reasonable Calculations for Educational Benefit 25 Industrial

Examining the Relationship of Quality IEPs to Student Progress

A Reflective Process to Promote Reasonable Calculations for Educational

Benefit

25 Industrial Park Road, Middletown, CT 06457-1520 · (860) 632-1485

Connecticut State Department of Education · Division of Educational Programs and Services January 27, 2006

Page 2: Examining the Relationship of Quality IEPs to Student Progress A Reflective Process to Promote Reasonable Calculations for Educational Benefit 25 Industrial

10/27/05SERC

2

What is “Educational Benefit”?

Determine with a Neighbor

What does this term mean to you?

Page 3: Examining the Relationship of Quality IEPs to Student Progress A Reflective Process to Promote Reasonable Calculations for Educational Benefit 25 Industrial

10/27/05SERC

3

What is Educational Benefit?

Instruction that is reasonably calculated to enable the child to achieve passing marks and advance from grade to grade

Judge Rehnquist

BOE v. Rowley decision, June 28,1982

Page 4: Examining the Relationship of Quality IEPs to Student Progress A Reflective Process to Promote Reasonable Calculations for Educational Benefit 25 Industrial

10/27/05SERC

4

Educational Benefit

Educational Benefit can be measured by… Passing marks Advancement from grade to grade Progress toward goals and objectives Improved scores on district/statewide

assessments/ alternate assessment Passing the high school exit exam

Page 5: Examining the Relationship of Quality IEPs to Student Progress A Reflective Process to Promote Reasonable Calculations for Educational Benefit 25 Industrial

10/27/05SERC

5

IDEA ‘04

The IEP must include… “a statement of the special education and related

services and supplementary aids and services,…to be provided to the child,…

to advance appropriately toward attaining the annual goals;

to be involved in and make progress in the general education curriculum … and to participate in extracurricular and other nonacademic activities…”

Section 614 (d)(1)(A)(i)(IV)Section 614 (d)(1)(A)(i)(IV)

Page 6: Examining the Relationship of Quality IEPs to Student Progress A Reflective Process to Promote Reasonable Calculations for Educational Benefit 25 Industrial

10/27/05SERC

6

Focused Monitoring

“The primary focus of Federal and State monitoring activities…

improving educational results and functional outcomes for all children with disabilities”

Section 616 (a)(2)Section 616 (a)(2)

Page 7: Examining the Relationship of Quality IEPs to Student Progress A Reflective Process to Promote Reasonable Calculations for Educational Benefit 25 Industrial

10/27/05SERC

7

Why Procedural Compliance is Not Enough?

“You can be in compliance with all 755 required items and not be achieving results for students with disabilities.”

Alan Coulter

Page 8: Examining the Relationship of Quality IEPs to Student Progress A Reflective Process to Promote Reasonable Calculations for Educational Benefit 25 Industrial

10/27/05SERC

8

Current Underlying Concept

Compliance Consists of Two Interrelated Elements:

Educational Procedures

+

Educational Benefit (Results)

BOE v. Rowley, decision, June 28, 1982

www.hdc.lsuhsc.edu

Page 9: Examining the Relationship of Quality IEPs to Student Progress A Reflective Process to Promote Reasonable Calculations for Educational Benefit 25 Industrial

10/27/05SERC

9

How is Educational Benefit Obtained?

“instruction… should be reasonably calculated to enable the child to achieve passing marks and advance from grade to grade”

Judge Rehnquist

BOE v. Rowley decision, June 28,1982

Page 10: Examining the Relationship of Quality IEPs to Student Progress A Reflective Process to Promote Reasonable Calculations for Educational Benefit 25 Industrial

Assessing for Educational Benefit

A Process for Districts to Examine IEPs

Page 11: Examining the Relationship of Quality IEPs to Student Progress A Reflective Process to Promote Reasonable Calculations for Educational Benefit 25 Industrial

10/27/05SERC

11

Educational Benefit Analysis

Reviewing IEP documentation for a 3-year cycle

Analyzing the relationship among needs, goals, and services

Comparing progress across annuals Looking for patterns in the planning process Discussing if the IEP was reasonably planned

to result in educational benefit Reviewing the child’s progress

Page 12: Examining the Relationship of Quality IEPs to Student Progress A Reflective Process to Promote Reasonable Calculations for Educational Benefit 25 Industrial

10/27/05SERC

12

Steps for the Process

STEP 1Chart what is recorded in the IEPs about needs, goals and objectives, services and progress.

STEP 2Analyze the needs, goals and services within each IEP for alignment.

STEP 3Compare across each IEP to determine progression of progress (or lack of progress).

Page 13: Examining the Relationship of Quality IEPs to Student Progress A Reflective Process to Promote Reasonable Calculations for Educational Benefit 25 Industrial

10/27/05SERC

13

STEP 1

Jigsaw the documentation of each IEP

Look for… Present Level of Performance (p 3) Goals & Objectives, Accommodations &

Modifications (pp 4 & 8) Services (p 5) Progress made on annual goals (p 4)

Page 14: Examining the Relationship of Quality IEPs to Student Progress A Reflective Process to Promote Reasonable Calculations for Educational Benefit 25 Industrial

10/27/05SERC

14

STEP 1

For each IEP Record what is written on the IEP.

Information must be present in the IEP Information is verbatim as much as possible Short-hand and abbreviations are ok, but

paraphrasing or summarizing is not

Color Coded Green- what is written in IEP Blue-strengths Red-supporting documents (psy. evals)

Page 15: Examining the Relationship of Quality IEPs to Student Progress A Reflective Process to Promote Reasonable Calculations for Educational Benefit 25 Industrial

Present Levels

Concerns Goals/ Objectives

Services Progress

Academic/Cognitive Language Arts:

Domain

Page 16: Examining the Relationship of Quality IEPs to Student Progress A Reflective Process to Promote Reasonable Calculations for Educational Benefit 25 Industrial

Present Levels

Concerns Goals/ Objectives

Services Progress

Academic/Cognitive Language Arts:

KTEA Reading 3.4 G.E.Oral Reading Inventory 3.2 G.E.

Present Level

Page 17: Examining the Relationship of Quality IEPs to Student Progress A Reflective Process to Promote Reasonable Calculations for Educational Benefit 25 Industrial

Present Levels

Concerns Goals/ Objectives

Services Progress

Academic/Cognitive Language Arts:

KTEA Reading 3.4 G.E.Oral Reading Inventory 3.2 G.E.

Comp. is sig. below grade level

Concerns

Page 18: Examining the Relationship of Quality IEPs to Student Progress A Reflective Process to Promote Reasonable Calculations for Educational Benefit 25 Industrial

Present Levels

Concerns Goals/ Objectives

Services Progress

Academic/Cognitive Language Arts:

KTEA Reading 3.4 G.E.Oral Reading Inventory 3.2 G.E.

Comp. is sig. below grade level

Improve comp of read material from 3.2 to 5.0

Given passage state 2 detailsGiven passage ans correctly 5/6 W quest

Goals, Objectives, Accommodations,

& Modifications

Page 19: Examining the Relationship of Quality IEPs to Student Progress A Reflective Process to Promote Reasonable Calculations for Educational Benefit 25 Industrial

Present Levels

Concerns Goals/ Objectives

Services Progress

Academic/Cognitive Language Arts:

KTEA Reading 3.4 G.E.Oral Reading Inventory 3.2 G.E.

Comp. is sig. below grade level

Improve comp of read material from 3.2 to 5.0

Given passage state 2 detailsGiven passage ans correctly 5/6 W quest

Learning center 3.75 hrs/wk

Service

Page 20: Examining the Relationship of Quality IEPs to Student Progress A Reflective Process to Promote Reasonable Calculations for Educational Benefit 25 Industrial

Present Levels

Concerns Goals/ Objectives

Services Progress

Academic/Cognitive Language Arts:

KTEA Reading 3.4 G.E.Oral Reading Inventory 3.2 G.E.

Comp. is sig. below grade level

Improve comp of read material from 3.2 to 5.0

Given passage state 2 detailsGiven passage ans correctly 5/6 W quest

Learning center 3.75 hrs/wk

S

S

S

Progress

Page 21: Examining the Relationship of Quality IEPs to Student Progress A Reflective Process to Promote Reasonable Calculations for Educational Benefit 25 Industrial

Present Levels

Concerns Goals/ Objectives

Services Progress

Academic/Cognitive Language Arts:

KTEA Reading 3.4 G.E.Oral Reading Inventory 3.2 G.E.

Comp. is sig. below grade level

Improve comp of read material from 3.2 to 5.0

Given passage state 2 detailsGiven passage ans correctly 5/6 W quest

Learning center 3.75 hrs/wk

S

S

S

Page 22: Examining the Relationship of Quality IEPs to Student Progress A Reflective Process to Promote Reasonable Calculations for Educational Benefit 25 Industrial

10/27/05SERC

22

STEP 2

For each IEP The group will determine the alignment

between each component The recorder will draw circles and

arrows to show alignment

Page 23: Examining the Relationship of Quality IEPs to Student Progress A Reflective Process to Promote Reasonable Calculations for Educational Benefit 25 Industrial

Present Levels

Concerns Goals/ Objectives

Services Progress

Academic/Cognitive Language Arts:

KTEA Reading 3.4 G.E.Oral Reading Inventory 3.2 G.E.

Comp. is sig. below grade level

Improve comp of read material from 3.2 to 5.0

Given passage state 2 detailsGiven passage ans correctly 5/6 W quest

Learning center 3.75 hrs/wk

S

S

S

Page 24: Examining the Relationship of Quality IEPs to Student Progress A Reflective Process to Promote Reasonable Calculations for Educational Benefit 25 Industrial

10/27/05SERC

25

STEP 3

Comparing each IEP The group will determine if there was a

change from the previous IEP to the next IEP

The recorder will note the changes using 0, +, or –

Page 25: Examining the Relationship of Quality IEPs to Student Progress A Reflective Process to Promote Reasonable Calculations for Educational Benefit 25 Industrial

Present Levels

Concerns Goals/ Objectives

Services Progress

Academic/Cognitive Language Arts:

KTEA Reading 3.4 G.E.Oral Reading Inventory 3.2 G.E.

Comp. is sig. below grade level

Improve comp of read material from 3.2 to 5.0

Given passage state 2 detailsGiven passage ans correctly 5/6 W quest

Learning center 3.75 hrs/wk

S

S

S

o No change from prior year

+ Increased complexity or progress

- Decreased complexity or progress

Page 26: Examining the Relationship of Quality IEPs to Student Progress A Reflective Process to Promote Reasonable Calculations for Educational Benefit 25 Industrial

Present Levels

Concerns Goals/ Objectives

Services Progress

Academic/Cognitive Language Arts:

KTEA Reading 3.4 G.E.Oral Reading Inventory 3.2 G.E.

Comp. is sig. below grade level

Improve comp of read material from 3.2 to 5.0

Given passage state 2 detailsGiven passage ans correctly 5/6 W quest

Learning center 3.75 hrs/wk

S

S

S

KTEA Reading 2.1 G.E.Oral Reading Inventory 2.5 G.E.

+

Page 27: Examining the Relationship of Quality IEPs to Student Progress A Reflective Process to Promote Reasonable Calculations for Educational Benefit 25 Industrial

Present Levels

Concerns Goals/ Objectives

Services Progress

Academic/Cognitive Language Arts:

KTEA Reading 3.4 G.E.Oral Reading Inventory 3.2 G.E.

Comp. is sig. below grade level

Improve comp of read material from 3.2 to 5.0

Given passage state 2 detailsGiven passage ans correctly 5/6 W quest

Learning center 3.75 hrs/wk

S

S

S

Comp. is sig. below grade level

+

O

Page 28: Examining the Relationship of Quality IEPs to Student Progress A Reflective Process to Promote Reasonable Calculations for Educational Benefit 25 Industrial

Present Levels

Concerns Goals/ Objectives

Services Progress

Academic/Cognitive Language Arts:

KTEA Reading 3.4 G.E.Oral Reading Inventory 3.2 G.E.

Comp. is sig. below grade level

Improve comp of read material from 3.2 to 5.0

Given passage state 2 detailsGiven passage ans correctly 5/6 W quest

Learning center 3.75 hrs/wk

S

S

S

+

O

Improve comp of read material from 2.5 to 4.0

+

Page 29: Examining the Relationship of Quality IEPs to Student Progress A Reflective Process to Promote Reasonable Calculations for Educational Benefit 25 Industrial

Present Levels

Concerns Goals/ Objectives

Services Progress

Academic/Cognitive Language Arts:

KTEA Reading 3.4 G.E.Oral Reading Inventory 3.2 G.E.

Comp. is sig. below grade level

Improve comp of read material from 3.2 to 5.0

Given passage state 2 detailsGiven passage ans correctly 5/6 W quest

Learning center 3.75 hrs/wk

S

S

S

+

O

Given passage state 2 details

+

O

Page 30: Examining the Relationship of Quality IEPs to Student Progress A Reflective Process to Promote Reasonable Calculations for Educational Benefit 25 Industrial

Present Levels

Concerns Goals/ Objectives

Services Progress

Academic/Cognitive Language Arts:

KTEA Reading 3.4 G.E.Oral Reading Inventory 3.2 G.E.

Comp. is sig. below grade level

Improve comp of read material from 3.2 to 5.0

Given passage state 2 detailsGiven passage ans correctly 5/6 W quest

Learning center 3.75 hrs/wk

S

S

S

+

O

Given passage ans correctly 6/6 W quest

+

O

-

Page 31: Examining the Relationship of Quality IEPs to Student Progress A Reflective Process to Promote Reasonable Calculations for Educational Benefit 25 Industrial

Present Levels

Concerns Goals/ Objectives

Services Progress

Academic/Cognitive Language Arts:

KTEA Reading 3.4 G.E.Oral Reading Inventory 3.2 G.E.

Comp. is sig. below grade level

Improve comp of read material from 3.2 to 5.0

Given passage state 2 detailsGiven passage ans correctly 5/6 W quest

Learning center 3.75 hrs/wk

S

S

S

+

O+

O

-

O

Learning center 3.75 hrs/wk

Page 32: Examining the Relationship of Quality IEPs to Student Progress A Reflective Process to Promote Reasonable Calculations for Educational Benefit 25 Industrial

Present Levels

Concerns Goals/ Objectives

Services Progress

Academic/Cognitive Language Arts:

KTEA Reading 3.4 G.E.Oral Reading Inventory 3.2 G.E.

Comp. is sig. below grade level

Improve comp of read material from 3.2 to 5.0

Given passage state 2 detailsGiven passage ans correctly 5/6 W quest

Learning center 3.75 hrs/wk

S

S

S

+

O+

O

-

O

Page 33: Examining the Relationship of Quality IEPs to Student Progress A Reflective Process to Promote Reasonable Calculations for Educational Benefit 25 Industrial

Present Levels

Concerns Goals/ Objectives

Services Progress

Academic/Cognitive Language Arts:

KTEA Reading 3.4 G.E.Oral Reading Inventory 3.2 G.E.

Comp. is sig. below grade level

Improve comp of read material from 3.2 to 5.0

Given passage state 2 detailsGiven passage ans correctly 5/6 W quest

Learning center 3.75 hrs/wk

S

S

S

+

O+

O

-

O

Page 34: Examining the Relationship of Quality IEPs to Student Progress A Reflective Process to Promote Reasonable Calculations for Educational Benefit 25 Industrial

10/27/05SERC

35

Keeping Track

+ ∆