1
1083 had a PCC. More AA patients (22%) received a PCC compared to NHW patients (16%) while in hospital (P<0.001). In univariate analyses, AA race (OR, 1.50; 95% CI; 1.27-1.76), and insurance (Medicaid [OR, 1.90; 95% CI, 1.50-2.40] and Medicare [OR; 1.24; 95% CI, 1.07-1.43] each vs. private insurance) were asso- ciated with higher odds of PCC. After adjusting for insurance status, race, and severity of illness, AA and Medicaid patients had higher odds (OR, 1.31; 95% CI, 1.10-1.55, and OR, 1.72; 95% CI, 1.29-2.29) of PCC than NHW and private insur- ance patients, respectively. Conclusions. Hospitalized AA patients with advanced cancer were more likely to receive a PCC than NHW, even after adjusting for insur- ance status and severity of illness. Implications for research, policy, or practice. Rates of PCC found in this study, con- trary to previous studies, show increased use of palliative care among hospitalized AA patients. A better understanding of the factors associated with inpatient PCC, especially race, insurance, and socioeconomic status, is needed to help inform the development of interventions to improve access to palliative care for all patients with advanced cancer. Examining Palliative Care in Advanced Heart Failure: A Team-Based Approach (SA523-B) Glendon Tait, MD MSc FRCPC, Dalhousie Uni- versity and University of Toronto, Halifax, NS, Canada. Denise Marshall, MD, McMaster Univer- sity, Grimsby, ON, Canada. Joanna Bates, MD, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada. Valerie Schulz, MD MPH, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada. Lorelei Lingard University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada. Kori Ladonna University of West- ern Ontario London, ON, Canada. (All authors listed above had no relevant finan- cial relationships to disclose.) Objectives 1. Understand the perspectives of patient- identified heart failure team members. 2. Understand the factors that influence team-based care delivery in the context of advanced heart failure. 3. Identify opportunities for improving the provision of palliative care in advanced heart failure. Background. Although heart failure (HF) is a leading cause of death in Canada, there are few palliative care resources available for individuals living with advanced HF. In the wake of recent calls for improved palliative care integration for these patients, this study sought to understand how HF care teamsdcomplex entities comprised of HF patients, caregivers and healthcare profes- sionalsdcurrently perceive and experience the challenge of meeting palliative needs. Research Objectives. 1) To develop a theoret- ical model of the HF team as a complex adaptive system for advanced HF care. 2)To identify op- portunities to support and enable HF care team members, including palliative care experts, to effectively address patients’ palliative needs. Methods. Using a constructivist grounded the- ory approach, patients with NYHA Class III or IV were interviewed and asked to identify key members of their care team: for each patient, a team sampling unit (TSU) of three to eight in- terviews was formed. Analysis within and across TSUs was conducted using a constant compara- tive approach to identify key themes. Results. From 148 interviews, TSUs have been created for 42 index patients at three study sites in two provinces. Preliminary analysis suggests that the theme of navigation is central to the team’s work to meet patient needs, both acute and palliative. Navigation appeared to be impacted by both patient factorsdsuch as symp- tom complexity, mobility, agency and apprecia- tion of illnessdand team factorsdsuch as personal and professional relationships. Conclusions. When patient agency is high and patients are in tune with their symptoms, navi- gation appears to be positively impacted; pa- tients appear more likely to seek appropriate medical assistance and their healthcare pro- viders act more adaptively, perhaps because of their trust of patients who have an appreciation of their illness to direct aspects of their care. These results suggest that how patients interact with their HF team and navigate the system are complex phenomena not readily reducible to linear models. Implications for research, policy, or practice. Improving palliative care in HF may require system-based interventions that support care delivery adaptable to unique patient-team interactions and that capture the unique fea- tures that come with local systems and con- texts. 462 Vol. 47 No. 2 February 2014 Schedule With Abstracts

Examining Palliative Care in Advanced Heart Failure: A Team-Based Approach (SA523-B)

  • Upload
    kori

  • View
    212

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

462 Vol. 47 No. 2 February 2014Schedule With Abstracts

1083 had a PCC. More AA patients (22%)received a PCC compared to NHW patients(16%) while in hospital (P<0.001). In univariateanalyses, AA race (OR, 1.50; 95% CI; 1.27-1.76),and insurance (Medicaid [OR, 1.90; 95% CI,1.50-2.40] and Medicare [OR; 1.24; 95% CI,1.07-1.43] each vs. private insurance) were asso-ciated with higher odds of PCC. After adjustingfor insurance status, race, and severity of illness,AA and Medicaid patients had higher odds (OR,1.31; 95% CI, 1.10-1.55, and OR, 1.72; 95% CI,1.29-2.29) of PCC than NHW and private insur-ance patients, respectively.Conclusions. Hospitalized AA patients withadvanced cancer were more likely to receive aPCC than NHW, even after adjusting for insur-ance status and severity of illness.Implications for research, policy, orpractice. Rates of PCC found in this study, con-trary to previous studies, show increased use ofpalliative care among hospitalized AA patients.A better understanding of the factors associatedwith inpatient PCC, especially race, insurance,and socioeconomic status, is needed to helpinform the development of interventions toimprove access to palliative care for all patientswith advanced cancer.

Examining Palliative Care in AdvancedHeart Failure: A Team-Based Approach(SA523-B)Glendon Tait, MD MSc FRCPC, Dalhousie Uni-versity and University of Toronto, Halifax, NS,Canada. Denise Marshall, MD, McMaster Univer-sity, Grimsby, ON, Canada. Joanna Bates, MD,University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC,Canada. Valerie Schulz, MD MPH, University ofWestern Ontario, London, ON, Canada. LoreleiLingard University of Western Ontario, London,ON, Canada. Kori Ladonna University of West-ern Ontario London, ON, Canada.(All authors listed above had no relevant finan-cial relationships to disclose.)

Objectives1. Understand the perspectives of patient-

identified heart failure team members.2. Understand the factors that influence

team-based care delivery in the context ofadvanced heart failure.

3. Identify opportunities for improving theprovision of palliative care in advancedheart failure.

Background. Although heart failure (HF) is aleading cause of death in Canada, there are fewpalliative care resources available for individualsliving with advanced HF. In the wake of recentcalls for improved palliative care integration forthese patients, this study sought to understandhow HF care teamsdcomplex entities comprisedof HF patients, caregivers and healthcare profes-sionalsdcurrently perceive and experience thechallenge of meeting palliative needs.Research Objectives. 1) To develop a theoret-ical model of the HF team as a complex adaptivesystem for advanced HF care. 2)To identify op-portunities to support and enable HF careteam members, including palliative care experts,to effectively address patients’ palliative needs.Methods. Using a constructivist grounded the-ory approach, patients with NYHA Class III orIV were interviewed and asked to identify keymembers of their care team: for each patient, ateam sampling unit (TSU) of three to eight in-terviews was formed. Analysis within and acrossTSUs was conducted using a constant compara-tive approach to identify key themes.Results. From 148 interviews, TSUs have beencreated for 42 index patients at three study sitesin two provinces. Preliminary analysis suggeststhat the theme of navigation is central to theteam’s work to meet patient needs, both acuteand palliative. Navigation appeared to beimpacted by both patient factorsdsuch as symp-tom complexity, mobility, agency and apprecia-tion of illnessdand team factorsdsuch aspersonal and professional relationships.Conclusions. When patient agency is high andpatients are in tune with their symptoms, navi-gation appears to be positively impacted; pa-tients appear more likely to seek appropriatemedical assistance and their healthcare pro-viders act more adaptively, perhaps because oftheir trust of patients who have an appreciationof their illness to direct aspects of their care.These results suggest that how patients interactwith their HF team and navigate the system arecomplex phenomena not readily reducible tolinear models.Implications for research, policy, orpractice. Improving palliative care in HF mayrequire system-based interventions that supportcare delivery adaptable to unique patient-teaminteractions and that capture the unique fea-tures that come with local systems and con-texts.