Upload
phungtuyen
View
219
Download
5
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
2-153
Examination of drilling manufacturing operation made
by environmentally conscious way
Gyula Varga1, a
, Illes Dudas 2, b
1, 2
Department of Production Engineering
University of Miskolc
H-3515, Egyetemvaros a [email protected],
Abstract Drilling is one of the most commonly used machining operations. A twist drill has
numerous geometrical data such as angle of the tip, chisel edge angle, cutting lip length,
chisel edge length and helix angle. Each one of these data has affect on the cutting forces and
drilled hole qualities in different ways. Measurements were performed using different amount
of coolants and lubricants when inner and outer coolants admission. We measured the thrust,
torque, cutting tool wear, macroscopic and microscopic geometrical properties of the
machined surfaces. The drilling tool was examined by physical modelling. In this research the
measurement tasks, problems of the different parameters are examined. Furthermore, it
contains a mathematical model based on the roundness error.
Keywords: Drilled surface quality; minimal lubrication; hole roundness error;
environmentally conscious drilling
1. Introduction
Near Dry Machining is defined as the dispensing of cutting fluids at optimal flow rates,
small quantities of cutting fluid are allowed to the cutting zone directly [1, 2]. Papers relating
to Near Dry Machining are limited.
Near Dry Machining offers the following advantages: decreased use of metal working
fluids, reduced costs as compared to flood applications, reduced industrial hygiene hazard,
opportunity to employ more benign fluids (e.g., vegetable oils) and improved process
performance as compared to dry machining [3].
2. Literature review
Dowling and his co-authors [4] suggested the use of least squares method. Varghese and
his co-authors [5] proved that the least squares algorithm serves a good solution. Sun and his
co-authors [6] proposed a framework based Design of Experiment method for verifying the
estimation of circularity form errors. They based on the correlation among the controllable
factors, such as sampling method and form evaluation method. Jywe his co-authors [7], Roy
and Zhang [8], Samuel and Shunmugam [9], and Rajagopal and Anand [10] presented various
methods based on computational geometry, non-linear optimization, and using artificial
intelligence- based methods for the evaluation of the circularity.
Finally, a new model is proposed which can be used for both suggesting an inspection
plan given the value of acceptable error in the measurement of the circularity and for
estimating the circularity at the case of different parameters.
3. Circumstances of experiments
At our experiments we used the following circumstances [11]:
Machine tool: Manufacturing centre, type: MKC-500,
Lubrication: Oil: ÖMV-Öl X-Ultra-CF (without chlorine).
2-154
Cutting tool: twist drill (with right hand side flute) having inner cooling channels
(Ø 10,0 K20 GÜHRING VHM) with TiAlN coating
Further parameters can be found in Table 1.
Table 1. Values of some research parameters.
Coating of twist drills: TiAlN MoS2
Values of cutting speeds: 80 m/min 120 m/min
Feeds: 0,2 mm/rev 0,315 mm/rev
Coolants and lubrications: Minimal volume of lubricants Dry
hcmVoil /0 3 hcmVoil /10 3 hcmVoil /28 3
Criteria for drilling:
At least 15 m drilling length,
VBCorner max ≤ 0,5 mm, or till the damage of the twist drill
At measurements (at all twist drill clamping) we inspected the run out of the twist drill,
and when its value was smaller than 0,05 mm, we could begin the drilling.
4. Evaluation of measurement data
Each measurement was repeated at least three times when the same parameter setup
during executing our experiments. The evaluation was done by using mathematic statistics.
We determined the average, standard deviation, and relative deviation as well. The average
values of measured results were demonstrated as the function of the drilled length.
4.1. Results of measurements of roundness error
At the case of drilling experiments, after the given length of drilling (0.03m, 10m, 20m,
30m) we have examined the roundness errors of the drilled holes. The measuring was done on
the measuring equipment type TALYROND-73 made by TAYLOR-HOBSON (Fig. 1a). The
test specimens were clamped by a magnetic prism. We have drawn diagrams of roundness
error after each measurement. Here we are concentrating only on the roundness error of the
drilled holes. In order to make the possibility of comparing of the results, we measured the
same place of the holes of the roundness error. The measurements were done at the beginning
of the hole, and at the end of the hole, which is shown on Fig. 1b. The whole results of the
measuring activity is summarised in the research reports [12].
We used two different filters:
Switch B: the diagram contains the differences between the real and the theoretical
shape of the profile.
Switch N1 (normal): the diagram contains the surface roughness error and the
waveness error of the profile [13].
At measurements we used the standardised measuring arm (length is l=63,5 mm).
Figure 2 demonstrates descriptively the result of examination as the function of the length
of drilling. The measurement of the roundness error was done at the distance of 2mm from the
beginning and the end of the hole. These circles are signed at Fig. 1b. On Fig. 2 the
expression “at the beginning of the hole” means that the measurement was on the signed
circle.
4.2. Evaluations of experiments done by Factorial Experiment Design
By using of Factorial Experiment Design three times 8 experiments, multiplied three
times each, were elaborated. The codes and the technological and experimental data are given
in Table 2.
2-155
10
30
drilled surface
30
2
2
place of measurement
place of measurement
material: cast iron, (EN-GJL-200 (MSZ EN 1561))
Fig. 1. Measurements of roundness error, a) Roundness error measuring equipment type TALYROND-73,
b) Places of measuring of roundness errors of the holes on the section of the drilled specimen.
The result of the experiments can be seen on Fig. 2. Figure 2a shows the values of
roundness error when the volume of coolants and lubricants was hcmVoil /28 3 , while
Fig. 2b belongs to the case of hcmVoil /0 3 , that is for dry drilling. The evaluations of the
experiments were done by the method of full Factorial Experiment Design. Equation (1) valid
when the drilling length varies in between mLf 03,0 and mLf 30 , the volume of coolants
and lubricants from hcmVoil /0 3 till hcmVoil /28 3 , and from the beginning mlh 002,0
till the end mlh 028,0 of the hole in the workpiece. Although the length of the hole was
30mm long, but the measurements were done 2mm away from both end of the hole.
Table 2. Codes of specimen and technological and experimental data applied.
Number Length of
drilling, L0, m
Oil volume,
oilV , cm3/h
Length of hole,
lh, m
Cutting speed, vc,
m/min
1 0,03 10,0 0,002 80,00
2 30,0 10,0 0,002 80,00
3 0,03 28,0 0,002 80,00
4 30,0 28,0 0,002 80,00
5 0,03 10,0 0,028 80,00
6 30,0 10,0 0,028 80,00
7 0,03 28,0 0,028 80,00
8 30,0 28,0 0,028 80,00
hoilf
R
hoil
R
hf
R
oilf
R
h
R
oil
R
f
RR
error
lVLk
lVklLkVLklkVkLkkR
error
errorerrorerrorerrorerrorerrorerror
123
2313123210
(1)
where:
9398.440 errorRk 544.01 errorR
k 407.02 errorRk 2.9623 errorR
k
013.012 errorRk 817.2113 errorR
k 883.623 errorRk 481.0123 errorR
k
2-156
Length of drilling, m
0 03010 20 2010 30
40
10
30
20
50
40
10
30
20
50
Ro
un
dn
ess e
rro
r, R
, m
Ro
un
dn
ess e
rro
r, R
, m
Length of drilling, m
At the beginning of the hole At the beginning of the hole
At the end of the hole At the end of the hole
a) b)
Fig. 2. errorR - Measured values of roundness error,
a) at dry drilling ( hcmVoil /0 3 ), b) at Near Dry drilling ( hcmVoil /28 3 ),
Substituting the values of the parameters into Equation (1) the roundness error of the
drilled holes can be demonstrated. On the Fig. 3, it can be seen that the roundness error of the
drilled hole was smaller when higher value of coolants and lubricants ( hcmVoil /28 3 ) were
used. The roundness was smaller always at the end of the hole than at the beginning.
R 1 R 2
Fig. 3. Comparing of measured values of roundness errors of the twist drill.
5. Summary
This paper gave some remarks of successful implementation of near dry machining and
for different experimental parameters:
At the case of drilling of grey cast iron when the twist drill had inner cooling channels
we have managed assure appropriate cutting parameters.
Ro
un
dn
ess
erro
r, R
e,
m
Length of drilling, L0, m
Length of hole, lh, m
hcmVoil /0 3
hcmVoil /28 3
2-157
When using of at least hcmVoil /28 3 volume of lubricants we got smaller roundness
error than at the case of dry machining.
By the model we can plan the roundness error at the planning stage as well.
6. Acknowledgements
This publication was made in the frame of Hungarian – Polish Intergovernmental S&T
Cooperation Programme signed PL-2/2008, financially supported by National Office for
Research and Technology and its foreign contractual partner.
References
1. F. Klocke, G. Eisenblaetter. Dry Cutting. Annals of the CIRP-Manufacturing
Technology. 1997, 46/2, pp. 519-526.
2. F. Klocke, D. Lung. Minimalmengenkühlschmierung – Systeme. Werkzeuge und Medien.
In: VDI-Berichte. VDI-Verlag Düsseldorf. 2000, 1532, pp. 137-154.
3. K. Weinert. Trockenbearbeitung und Minimalmengenschmierung. Springer Verlag. 2000.
4. M.M. Dowling, P.M. Griffin, K.-L. Tsui, C. Zhou. Statistical issues in geometric feature
inspection using coordinate measuring machines. Technometrics. 1997, 39, 1, pp. 3-17.
5. P. Varghese, C. Zhang, H-P. Wang. A design of experiment approach to the selection of
CMM form-fitting algorithms. International Journal Prod. Res. 1996, 34, 10, pp. 2755-
2765.
6. A.Y.T. Sun, S. Anand, J.S.Y. Tang. Comprehensive design of experiments-based
framework for optimal CMM inspection and uncertainty analysis of form tolerances. Int.
J. Prod. Res. 2002, 40, 9, pp. 2097-2123.
7. W-H. Jywe, C-H. Liu, C-K. Chen. The min-max problem for evaluating the form error of
a circle. Measurement. 1999, 26, pp. 237-282.
8. U. Roy, X. Zhang. Establishment of a pair of concentric circles with the minimum radial
separation for assessing roundness error. Comput. Aided Design. 1992, 24, 3, pp. 161-
168.
9. G.L. Samuel, M.S. Shunmugam. Evaluation of circularity from coordinate and form data
using computational geometric techniques. Precis. Eng. 2000, 24, 3, pp. 251-263.
10. K. Rajagopal, S. Anand. Assessment of circularity error using a selective data partition
approach. Int. Journal Prod. Res., 1999, 37, 17, pp. 3959-3979.
11. G. Varga, I. Dudas. Modelling and Examinations of Environmentally Friendly Machining
Processes. Proc. of the TMT 2005. Antalya, Turkey. Sep. 26-30, 2005, pp. 121-124,
ISBN: 9958-617-28-5.
12. I. Dudas, Gy. Varga, T. Csermely, I. Tolvaj. Environmentally Friendly Cutting
Technologies – drilling with minimum quantity of coolant and lubricants or dry drilling.
(STD - 2EC sign, project number ERB CIPACT 930167). Report of Research Project,
University of Miskolc, Department of Production Engineering, Report 3. 1995, pp. 58,
(in Hungarian).
13. I. Tolvaj. Geometrical Examination made at Environmentally Friendly Drilling
Experiments. 9th International Conference on Tools, University of Miskolc, Miskolc.
Sept. 03-05, 1996, pp. 559-565, ISBN: 963 661 279 X.