55
Exam Review: March 9, 2010 50110Xm1Review.PPt Updated: March 8, 2010

Exam Review: March 9, 2010 50110Xm1Review.PPt Updated: March 8, 2010

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Exam Review: March 9, 2010 50110Xm1Review.PPt Updated: March 8, 2010

Exam Review: March 9, 2010

50110Xm1Review.PPt

Updated: March 8, 2010

Page 2: Exam Review: March 9, 2010 50110Xm1Review.PPt Updated: March 8, 2010

Intro501: Introduction to Cancer Biology and to the Course

(501Intro.ppt)

Page 3: Exam Review: March 9, 2010 50110Xm1Review.PPt Updated: March 8, 2010

Figure 1.11a The Biology of Cancer (© Garland Science 2007)

Banding pattern of normal metaphase human chromosomes

Page 4: Exam Review: March 9, 2010 50110Xm1Review.PPt Updated: March 8, 2010

Figure 1.11b The Biology of Cancer (© Garland Science 2007)

Fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) of normal metaphase human chromosomes

using chromosome specific DNA probes with different fluorescent dyes

Page 5: Exam Review: March 9, 2010 50110Xm1Review.PPt Updated: March 8, 2010

Figure 1.11c The Biology of Cancer (© Garland Science 2007)

Aneuploid karyotype of human breast cancer cell.

Note “scrambling” of colors demonstrating chromosomal reciprocal translocations

Page 6: Exam Review: March 9, 2010 50110Xm1Review.PPt Updated: March 8, 2010

Figure 1.11d The Biology of Cancer (© Garland Science 2007)

Intra-chromosonal inversion by M-band fluorescent in situ hybridization(mFISH)

Page 7: Exam Review: March 9, 2010 50110Xm1Review.PPt Updated: March 8, 2010

Figure 1.14a The Biology of Cancer (© Garland Science 2007)

Cytoskeleton:

Actin microfilaments

Microtubules

Intermediate filaments

Page 8: Exam Review: March 9, 2010 50110Xm1Review.PPt Updated: March 8, 2010

Figure 1.14b The Biology of Cancer (© Garland Science 2007)

Intermediate Filaments of epithelial cell (keratin) in green

Plasma membrane in blue

Page 9: Exam Review: March 9, 2010 50110Xm1Review.PPt Updated: March 8, 2010

Figure 1.14d The Biology of Cancer (© Garland Science 2007)

3T3 Mouse Fibroblast attached to fibronectin extra-cellular matrix by integrin receptors

Page 10: Exam Review: March 9, 2010 50110Xm1Review.PPt Updated: March 8, 2010

Clinical Presentation of Cancers

(Clinical.ppt)

Page 11: Exam Review: March 9, 2010 50110Xm1Review.PPt Updated: March 8, 2010

Please be sure to send in your name under “Send User Data” as Usual:

Then respond:

I am here for this Exam Review.

1. Yes2. No3. Not Sure

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20

21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40

41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80

81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95

Page 12: Exam Review: March 9, 2010 50110Xm1Review.PPt Updated: March 8, 2010

Figure 16.1b The Biology of Cancer (© Garland Science 2007)

Page 13: Exam Review: March 9, 2010 50110Xm1Review.PPt Updated: March 8, 2010

Figure 16.1a The Biology of Cancer (© Garland Science 2007)

Page 14: Exam Review: March 9, 2010 50110Xm1Review.PPt Updated: March 8, 2010

Figure 16.45a The Biology of Cancer (© Garland Science 2007)

Page 15: Exam Review: March 9, 2010 50110Xm1Review.PPt Updated: March 8, 2010

See Figure 11.1, Cancer incidence at various ages for men and women. p. 400. Weinberg.

Note maximum incidence per 100,000 population at about age 70, then drop off after that age. Serious incidence begins around age 35 except for breast cancer which can have an earlier onset depending on genetics.

Incidence of Various Kinds of Cancers in Men and Women as a Function of Age

Page 16: Exam Review: March 9, 2010 50110Xm1Review.PPt Updated: March 8, 2010

Figure 16.45c The Biology of Cancer (© Garland Science 2007)

Page 17: Exam Review: March 9, 2010 50110Xm1Review.PPt Updated: March 8, 2010

Figure 11.8b The Biology of Cancer (© Garland Science 2007)

Page 18: Exam Review: March 9, 2010 50110Xm1Review.PPt Updated: March 8, 2010

Figure 14.50a The Biology of Cancer (© Garland Science 2007)

Page 19: Exam Review: March 9, 2010 50110Xm1Review.PPt Updated: March 8, 2010

Figure 14.50b The Biology of Cancer (© Garland Science 2007)

Page 20: Exam Review: March 9, 2010 50110Xm1Review.PPt Updated: March 8, 2010

Epidemiology of Cancers

(Epidemio.ppt)

Page 21: Exam Review: March 9, 2010 50110Xm1Review.PPt Updated: March 8, 2010
Page 22: Exam Review: March 9, 2010 50110Xm1Review.PPt Updated: March 8, 2010

Figure 4.12 The Biology of Cancer (© Garland Science 2007)

Incidence of Burkitt’s Lymphoma in Relation to Infectious Disease Etiology:Aedes simpsoni mosquito transmission vector for malaria and Epstein Barr Virus co-infection

Page 23: Exam Review: March 9, 2010 50110Xm1Review.PPt Updated: March 8, 2010

Figure 2.20 The Biology of Cancer (© Garland Science 2007)

Cancer Incidence Following Migration

p. 45

Page 24: Exam Review: March 9, 2010 50110Xm1Review.PPt Updated: March 8, 2010

CigBooze

Page 25: Exam Review: March 9, 2010 50110Xm1Review.PPt Updated: March 8, 2010

Definitions of Classifications of Cancer

(DefClass.ppt)

Page 26: Exam Review: March 9, 2010 50110Xm1Review.PPt Updated: March 8, 2010
Page 27: Exam Review: March 9, 2010 50110Xm1Review.PPt Updated: March 8, 2010

Normal Secretory & Ciliated Epithelial Cells

Figure 16-19, ECB, 1998, p. 528RespCilia

Ciliated Epithelium ofHuman Respiratory Tract

Page 28: Exam Review: March 9, 2010 50110Xm1Review.PPt Updated: March 8, 2010

Figure 11.7 The Biology of Cancer (© Garland Science 2007)

Prpgression in Neoplastic Development: Weinberg, Chapter 11 on Multistep Tumorigenesis. Figure 11.7

Page 29: Exam Review: March 9, 2010 50110Xm1Review.PPt Updated: March 8, 2010

Cancer Incidence 2002: 1,285,000. Cancer Deaths 555,000. 43% Death RateCancer Incidence 2009: 1,479,000. Cancer Deaths 562,000. 38% Death Rate

Page 30: Exam Review: March 9, 2010 50110Xm1Review.PPt Updated: March 8, 2010

Table 2.3 The Biology of Cancer (© Garland Science 2007)p. 33

Page 31: Exam Review: March 9, 2010 50110Xm1Review.PPt Updated: March 8, 2010

Hematopoiesis (formation of blood cells)Fig 2-1, Kuby 4th Ed. p. 28

HematoAll

Page 32: Exam Review: March 9, 2010 50110Xm1Review.PPt Updated: March 8, 2010

Pluripotent Stem Celland Lymphoid andMyeloid Lineages

(Fig 2-1, Kuby 4th Ed. p. 28

Myeloid Stem Cell

StemCell

Page 33: Exam Review: March 9, 2010 50110Xm1Review.PPt Updated: March 8, 2010

Lymphoid Lineage

Fig 2-1 Kuby 4th Ed

p. 28

Page 34: Exam Review: March 9, 2010 50110Xm1Review.PPt Updated: March 8, 2010

MyeloidLineage(Kuby, Fig 2-1,4th Ed., p. 28)

Myeloid

Page 35: Exam Review: March 9, 2010 50110Xm1Review.PPt Updated: March 8, 2010

Figure 8.32 The Biology of Cancer (© Garland Science 2007)

Disease Progression in Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia

p. 293

Page 36: Exam Review: March 9, 2010 50110Xm1Review.PPt Updated: March 8, 2010

Model Systems in the Study of Cancers

(Models.ppt)

Page 37: Exam Review: March 9, 2010 50110Xm1Review.PPt Updated: March 8, 2010
Page 38: Exam Review: March 9, 2010 50110Xm1Review.PPt Updated: March 8, 2010

Figure 13.8 The Biology of Cancer (© Garland Science 2007) p. 539

Primary excised surgical tumor pieces

Surgical specimens after 3 to 6 months growth sub-cutaneously in SCID Mice

Prostate and colon cancer cell lines propagated in vitro and implanted

Comparisons of Two Primary Cancers vs the Cancers Propagated as Model Systems

Cancer Comparisons

Page 39: Exam Review: March 9, 2010 50110Xm1Review.PPt Updated: March 8, 2010

Cancer Model Systems In Vitro(in Cell, Tissue, or Organ Culture)

Normal Cells in Culture• Transformed Cells Chemically Virally By Irradiation• Neoplastic Cells from Animal Tumors• Neoplastic Cells Cultured from Human

Cancers

CxVitro

Page 40: Exam Review: March 9, 2010 50110Xm1Review.PPt Updated: March 8, 2010

Animal Tumor Models in VivoSource of the Tumor Challenge Cells

• Implanted Cultured Neoplastic Cells

• Transplanted from Donor Animals

Early vs Later Transplant Generations

• Induced in the Tumor-bearing Host Animals

Spontaneous (by Genetic Selection)

Chemical, Viral, Radiation Induction

• Excised fromVeterinaryAnimalsAnimlCx1

Page 41: Exam Review: March 9, 2010 50110Xm1Review.PPt Updated: March 8, 2010

Clinical Human Cancers as "Model" Systems

Advantages:• The Closest "Model" to the Ultimate Goals ...The Best Model for Human Cancer• Patient Feed-back and CooperationLimitations• Unmatched, genetically unique subjects• Powerful ethical limitations• Patient Independence and Failure to Comply• Prior or Concomitant TreatmentVideo on Clinical Trials in Patients

A note on Experimental Cancer Therapy and National Health-Care Policy –

Keith Olbermann, MSNBC Countdown, February 9, 2010

Page 42: Exam Review: March 9, 2010 50110Xm1Review.PPt Updated: March 8, 2010

Properties of Cancer Cells and Tissues

(CellProp.ppt)

Page 43: Exam Review: March 9, 2010 50110Xm1Review.PPt Updated: March 8, 2010

Figure 10.2 The Biology of Cancer (© Garland Science 2007) p. 359

Senescence of Human Fibroblasts Passaged Beyond 60 Cell Doublings

In Cell Culture

Page 44: Exam Review: March 9, 2010 50110Xm1Review.PPt Updated: March 8, 2010

Figure 10.11 The Biology of Cancer (© Garland Science 2007)p. 369

Telomeres* on normal cells protect chromosome ends

Cells with blocked telomere formation show extensive chromosme fusion leading to cell death* Telomeres labelled green by Fluorescence in situ

hybridization with DNA probe that recognizes repeated nucleotide base sequence in telomeric DNA

Protective Effect of Telomeres on Chromosome Integrity

Page 45: Exam Review: March 9, 2010 50110Xm1Review.PPt Updated: March 8, 2010

12 Different Cell-signaling pathways

potentially containing aberrant protein

components in 24 different patients with

pancreatic cancers.

From Science, Sept. 26, 2008

Jones et al.pp 1801-1806

Note integrin signaling

Page 46: Exam Review: March 9, 2010 50110Xm1Review.PPt Updated: March 8, 2010

Cancer Cell Heterogeneity

(Hetero.ppt)

Page 47: Exam Review: March 9, 2010 50110Xm1Review.PPt Updated: March 8, 2010

Figure 11.19 The Biology of Cancer (© Garland Science 2007)

p. 422Chromosome 11 is Blue-Green. Chromosome 17 is pink by FISH with DNA Probes

Pleural effusion,

non-small cell lung

carcinoma in a patient.

Heterogeneity in

chromosome number and

in nuclear size

Page 48: Exam Review: March 9, 2010 50110Xm1Review.PPt Updated: March 8, 2010

Progression in Cancer Initiation and Development

(Progress. Ppt)

Page 49: Exam Review: March 9, 2010 50110Xm1Review.PPt Updated: March 8, 2010

Progressive Steps in Neoplastic Cell Development:Hyperplasia and Dysplasia

Page 50: Exam Review: March 9, 2010 50110Xm1Review.PPt Updated: March 8, 2010

Progressive Steps in Neoplastic Cell Development:Cancer In situ and Invasive Cancer

Situ&Invade

Page 51: Exam Review: March 9, 2010 50110Xm1Review.PPt Updated: March 8, 2010

Figure 11.10 The Biology of Cancer (© Garland Science 2007)

p. 409

Loss of Tumor Suppressor Genes (TSG) in Progression in Colon Carcinoma

“DCC” Gene = Deleted in Colon Carcinoma

“APC” = Adenomatous polyposis coli gene (Cancer suppressor gene)“K-ras” = Oncogene activated, transduced, or mutated, first identified in virally-induced rat sarcoma

Page 52: Exam Review: March 9, 2010 50110Xm1Review.PPt Updated: March 8, 2010

R

T

K

R

T

K

Ras Pathway

SHC

GDP

GTP CD-GEGIIGAP

GTP

Elk1

c-FosATF2

c-Jun

Actin

Cytosk

eleton

PP P

P

P

P

Stress Fibers and Focal AdhesionsStress Fibers and Focal Adhesions

GeneExpression

GeneExpression

PLDPathway

PLDPathway

PMAPMA

Growth FactorsGrowth FactorsIncreased T Cell

AdhesionIncreased T Cell

Adhesion

IntegrinsIntegrins

β1β1β2β2 β2β2

β1β1β1β1SOS

p120-GAP

p190-B

Rho

PI3KPLC-ε

Rap1A

PLD RalBP1

PAKs

ERKs

ERKs

JNKK

JNKJNK

MEKK1

CDC42

Rac

MEKs

RafRalGDS

Ral

GRB2

TC

R

TC

R

AntigenAntigen

LckGEF

Ras Ras

2009ProteinLounge.com 2009ProteinLounge.com

C

Page 53: Exam Review: March 9, 2010 50110Xm1Review.PPt Updated: March 8, 2010

Figure 11.43 The Biology of Cancer (© Garland Science 2007)p. 459

hTert = Telomerase catalytic subunit

Page 54: Exam Review: March 9, 2010 50110Xm1Review.PPt Updated: March 8, 2010

A Note About Completing Matching Questions

1.Each response in column B can be used only once.

2.Strike off a response from Column B when you use it in column A.

3.You have to match the best response from column B to the item in column A, not just one that might fit.

4.If you use a less-than-optimal response from Column B, you won’t have that response when you need it.

5.Answer the matching items that you are completely sure about.

6.That reduces the number of options you have to deal with.

7.The more you actually know for sure, the easier this kind of question is because it reduces your uncertainties to a very low number of options.

Page 55: Exam Review: March 9, 2010 50110Xm1Review.PPt Updated: March 8, 2010

This slide will be set to anonymous so it should say “Not accepting user data”.

Your response is important so please provide your opinion.Please respond to the following:

This review for the mid-term exam was

Not

very

use

ful a

nd not

w...

Rea

sonab

ly use

ful. O

vera

..

A re

ally g

ood id

ea. Y

ou s.

..

33% 33%33%

1. Not very useful and not worth doing.

2. Reasonably useful. Overall worth doing.

3. A really good idea. You should do it for other exams.

0 of 95