2
Exam 2 questions in 2 hour You should be trying to maximise quantity. Largely predictable. The answer to the conventional question Of course you may just revise 2. You get credits to make links within topic, author and themes. Not many make good connections. Remind ourselves of what are the topics are. Started with Locke. It is in a sense, it could come up with any in the topic. There’s assumption that how property works. Please be creative be thinking about Locke. There are reasons why ideas of these are still viable. Mabo: Property and sovereignty. Lockean’s possessive individualism can explain negative property/radical tittle – indigenous people. What is involved in a Western European legal system try to get to the indigenous understanding and the process of recognition Hegel. Clearly seen – the idea of understanding what has to do with property What practicable relevance. Hayek: think about relationship between this 2 authors. The idea of property law as instrument that facilitate our autonomy. Bentham and Hayek focuses the theory of law itself and enrich itself. What is it about the institution of property law. Property as a singular form – it can be fragmented into different languages. Commons The issue about the commons is really about digital commons. Is there an argument that we can make with the consistent of commons? Cultural property

Exam Notes

  • Upload
    tp

  • View
    218

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Exam

2 questions in 2 hourYou should be trying to maximise quantity. Largely predictable. The answer to the conventional questionOf course you may just revise 2. You get credits to make links within topic, author and themes. Not many make good connections. Remind ourselves of what are the topics are. Started with Locke. It is in a sense, it could come up with any in the topic. Theres assumption that how property works. Please be creative be thinking about Locke. There are reasons why ideas of these are still viable.

Mabo:Property and sovereignty.Lockeans possessive individualism can explain negative property/radical tittle indigenous people. What is involved in a Western European legal system try to get to the indigenous understanding and the process of recognition

Hegel.Clearly seen the idea of understanding what has to do with propertyWhat practicable relevance. Hayek: think about relationship between this 2 authors. The idea of property law as instrument that facilitate our autonomy. Bentham and Hayek focuses the theory of law itself and enrich itself. What is it about the institution of property law. Property as a singular form it can be fragmented into different languages.

CommonsThe issue about the commons is really about digital commons. Is there an argument that we can make with the consistent of commons?

Cultural propertyPlease Mabel, the life of cultural property in the legal discourse. Post colonial politics. The time extended itself.

BodyDignity versus autonomy. Can a body not be an autonomy vs trading part of our bodyBody vs technical development.

You need to translate the form of the examiner what is it getting at. Have to accept and take on. The reality the exam is not closed.

The issue that you want to draw out. The questions is about autonomy. What you need to do which very few people do. What do you mean by autonomy?!Considerable leeway. What locke, myselfs view of autonomy. You need to take on the question in the first paragraph. Not dictionary merely. Autonomy for whom?

Idea with property and autonomys connection.Locke is making a connection with locke and propertyCONTRAST? -> Locke is articulating is very good sentiment of what it is owning sth. Explain why it is or how it is owning property is good for our autonomy. Some students suggested why their priority matters. Like radical title, why does it arise! You are simultaneously answering the question and doing the maneuver.

GET TO THE QUESTIONDONT FEEL LIKE YOU HAVE TO TALK ALL THE THING OF LOCKES AUTONOMYDO FEEL TO BE ENTITLED TO FOLLOW A THEME AND BE SPECIFIC!

Regrettablely, amazing years and years, answer looks exactly the same. Distinguish yourself