Upload
asher-anderson
View
213
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
EVOLVING TRENDS IN HIGH PERFORMANCE INFRASTRUCTURE
Andrew F. Bach
Chief Architect FSI – Juniper Networks
2
AGENDA
The Need For High Performance11
The challenge22
The limitations today 33
Resulting trends44
Impact on Data center Infrastructure55
3
AGENDA
The Need For High Performance11
The challenge22
The limitations 33
A better solution44
Junipers products and next steps55
4
TRANSACTIONS BECOME BANDWIDTH DISTRIBUTED TO THE FINANCIAL COMMUNITY (TERABITS/SEC) FROM OPRA SYSTEM
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 20150
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
5
400+ YEARS OF RAPID TECHNOLOGY ADOPTION
And a rich history of technology innovation in markets…
First stock ticker to disseminate data (1867)
First telephones on the trading floors (1878)
First electronic ticker display board (1966)
Wireless handheld devices on Trading floors 15 years before ipad invented (1995)
Industry’s first private network offeringglobal connectivity
Industry’s private network exceeds 1TbS
6
AGENDA
The Need For Speed11
The challenge22
The limitations 33
A better solution44
Junipers products and next steps 55
7
FSS CHALLENGES
Regulatory model is driving change Requirement for long term retention of data Requirement to archive meta data Real time risk management is now required
FSS is evolving to a commodity industry Time to market must be faster Product life time is shorting Margins are reducing driving OPEX reduction
Technology adoption is continuing to accelerating to meet accelerating business needs Fuel the race to the triple crown of technology (0 cost, 0 latency, 0 time to market);
Technology is a strategic weapon Bandwidth demand continues to grow at 30% - 50% per year. Comprehensive management and orchestration of the data center
Fundamental new architectures are required Flat Clos like architectures Tightly coupled datacenter network to the wide area optical network Tightly couple the Networks and the servers - SDN
8
A TYPICAL CHALLENGE
Matching engine
CustomerGatewaySymbol routing
risk management
TO
R
CORE
TO
R
TO
R
TO
R
TO
R
TO
R
TO
R
TO
R
CORE
CORE
CORE
Grand Total ≈150.0µS
Trade Plant Size:≈ 100 Servers≈ 1500 Ports
9
AGENDA
The Need For Speed11
The challenge22
The limitations today 33
A better solution44
Junipers products and next steps55
10
LATENCY REDUCTION TRENDS (TOR)
2008 2010 2011 2012 2013
Ethernet is narrowing the gap to Infiniband; industry tracking to < 450ns in 2013
11
SLOWING OF PROCESSOR SPEED
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 450
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
processor speed
processor speed
12
THE TRADE OFF AXIS
SC
ALE
RE
LIA
BIL
ITY
FEATURE VELOCITY
LATENCY
13
AGENDA
The Need For Speed11
The challenge22
The limitations 33
Resulting trends44
Junipers products and next steps55
14
A DIFFERENT APPROACH - DISTRIBUTED COMPUTING
Matching engine
TO
R
TO
RT
OR
TO
R
CORE
CORE
Grand Total ≈100.0µS Reduced by 50µS
Customer
Risk Management embedded in TOR
Symbol routing embedded in
TOR
NIC
NIC
Data pre/post processing
Trade Plant Size:≈ 60 Servers≈ 1000 Ports
15
APPLICATIONS EMBEDDED NETWORKING – THE NEW WAY TO REDUCE LATENCY AND COST
The race to zero is ending at about 200 – 500NS for a reasonable switch Need to focus on a different approach
Imbed application snippets into the switching fabric Lower latency Eliminates servers Reduces network ports
Imbed snippets at the control or data plane of the network Application can be embedded in a VM in the switch of into
a FPGA in the data path of the switch
16
RETURN OF THE CLOS DATA CENTER FABRICS
100% of all National market da runs on JNPR
90% Allequity order flow
All US markets distribute market data over JNPRData Center 1 LayerCarrier Hotel
CustomerConnections
17
DATA CENTER SIMPLIFICATION LOWERCOST AND EASE OF USE
Four architectures for a data center, all the same building blocks Stand alone TOR’s MC-LAG Virtual Chassis Fabric
Solutions range from classic to fabric
All share common management support
All are SDN enabled and support advanced management tools and scripting
18
WAN – FSS BUILDING THEIR OWN PRIVATE CARRIER NETWORKS
Lease a service/cloud Shared service Reduced agility Resiliency tested at failure time Easy solution – no need for a technical staff Good solution for a medium to small firm
Build and operate a private cloud Dedicated service Rapidly adaptable to meet changing requirements Customer defines and validates resiliency, easing regulatory
compliance Needs a small skilled staff Lower cost as third parties profit is removed
19
AGENDA
The Need For Speed11
The challenge22
The limitations 33
A better solution44
Impact on the data center infrastructure55
20
IMPACT ON COMPUTE AND NETWORK
Centralize processing where you can distribute where you mustProcessors and network switches and hitting natural limitsTo achieve a high performance infrastructure compute resource
must be distributedOptimize computing in the Server, NIC(FPGA), and network
Switches(VM’s and FPGA’s) – not just one place
Drive to Clos fabricsHeavy East – West TrafficCompounded Bandwidth growth > 20% per yearAll networks become virtual
21
BANDWIDTH DEMANDS
Servers will be requiring 40G As CPU cores increase by 2016 server bandwidth will need 40G High end servers will need 100G Servers at 100G will drive the need for network links of 400G and
1T
22
IMPACT OF SDN/NFV/ORCHESTRATION
Manages virtual fiber plant
Controls the adds/moves/changes from the servers via overlays
Increased need to design the cable plant correct and for a longer life
Merging of network, server, and storage teams into one
23
THANK YOU!