Upload
kaila-moreno
View
217
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Evolutionary Evolutionary Perspectives Perspectives
on Rapeon Rape
Starting PointsStarting PointsLanguage: “Victims” vs. “Survivors”Averages: Individual differences in
rapists, victimsMale rapists, female victims
Definitional Issues (1)Definitional Issues (1)Definitions:
Penile-Vaginal? Force or threat of force? Resistance?
“Copulation involving either the individual’s resistance to the best of his/her ability, or the reasonable likelihood that such resistance would result in death or bodily harm to the victim or others whom he/she commonly protects.” (Palmer, 1989)
Definitional Issues (2)Definitional Issues (2)
Semantic IssuesSemantic IssuesRape vs. forced copulation
Animal models“They know not what they do”
Sex vs. violence Rapist’s or victims perspective?
Attractiveness, harm to victim, sex & affection
Legal ramifications
Modern Historical Context (1)Modern Historical Context (1)Miller (1931)
Rape is unique to humans because of reshaping of the pelvis
Brownmiller (1975) Non-human animals do not engage in
rape because mating in the wild is controlled by the female estrous cycle
Feminist theory During rape, “the sexual act is not
concerned with sexual gratification but with the deployment of the penis as a concrete symbol of masculine social power” (Sanday, 1990)
Rape "is nothing more or less than a conscious process of intimidation by which all men keep all women in a state of fear" (Brownmiller, 1975)
Modern Historical Context (2)Modern Historical Context (2)
Non-Human Animal ResearchNon-Human Animal ResearchResearch has been conducted on non-
human primates, fish, frogs, elephant seals
Considerable focus has been given to waterfowl Synchronicity Mate guarding Sperm competition following FC Predictive models
Insect ResearchInsect ResearchWing perching in the damselflyPanorpa scorpionfly (Thornhill, 1980)
Three mating strategies
Likelihood of Committing Likelihood of Committing RapeRape
Rape scenario study (Malamuth et al, 1980) 17% endorsed rape scenario 51% endorsed scenario with the
condition that they wouldn’t get caught
Additional 21% scored middle of the scale
Evolutionarily-relevant information (Thornhill & Thornhill, 1991) Over-representation of women of high
reproductive age (RA) Women of RA more likely to be
subjected to penile-vaginal rape RA associated with ejaculate in the
reproductive tract
Rape & EPRape & EP
Women of RA suffer more than post-RA women or pre-RA girls
Married women suffer moreNegative correlation between signs of
violence and sufferingPenile-vaginal rape caused more
suffering only in RA womenRelationship to rapist (stranger, friend,
family)
Psychological PainPsychological Pain
Thornhill & Thornhill (1990a,b,c,d)
Rape AvoidanceRape AvoidanceChavanne & Gallup (1998)
During ovulatory phase of menstrual cycle, women engage in fewer risky behaviours
Participants taking birth control pills showed little variation
Effect is not an artifact of reduced sex drive or reduced general activity
EP Theories: By-productEP Theories: By-productSymons (1979), Palmer (1991)
Insufficient evidence for adaptation Rape is on a continuum of behaviours
and is a byproduct of other adaptations (e.g., partner variety and impersonal sex)
Ellis (1989); Malamuth (1996) Biosocial factors (e.g., delinquency)
and neurological differences
EP Theories: AdaptationEP Theories: AdaptationShields & Shields (1983)
Victim “vulnerability detector”Thornhill & Thornhill (1983)
Mate Deprivation hypothesisAgreement between adaptationist & by-
product theories Facultative vs. obligate genes Psychological pain & mate choice
violation
Synthesis (1)Synthesis (1)EP framework can integrate proximate
& ultimate causes into an overarching framework (e.g., Malamuth, 1996)
Synthesis (1)Synthesis (1)EP framework can integrate proximate
& ultimate causes into an overarching framework (e.g., Malamuth, 1996)
Delinquency
Attitudes (Violence)
Sexual Promiscuity
Hostile Masculinit
y
Coerciveness against Women
Parental Violenc
e
Child Abuse
Feminists vs. evolutionists?Sex vs. violence?
Muelenhard et al (1996): Control/consentNew research direction
Rape as a short-term mating strategy and the Micro-Mate Deprivation hypothesis (Lalumière et al, in preparation; Lalumière et al, 1996; Lalumière & Quinsey, 1996; Quinsey & Lalumière, 1995)
Synthesis (2)Synthesis (2)
The Wrap-UpThe Wrap-UpDefinitional & semantic issuesHistorical contextNon-human animal & insect researchRape in humans
Likelihood of committing, evolutionary evidence, psychological pain, avoidance
Rape theories (adaptation vs. by-product)New research directions
Things to ComeThings to ComeStatus, Prestige, & Dominance
Dominance hierarchies EP theories of dominance Multilevel-selection and hierarchies Submissiveness