Evidence and Claims HO

  • Upload
    meadecm

  • View
    215

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/3/2019 Evidence and Claims HO

    1/2

    CompLit 122

    11/04/2009

    Evidence & Claims1

    Crucial site for connectionEvidence is the entirety of the primary materialand data that makes up the subject of the writing inquestion. (The subject, strictly speaking, is limitedto that portion of an unknown about which youhave claims to make.)

    A claim is an assertion that you make about yourevidence: an idea that you believe the evidencesupports. (The primary claim in a paper is thethesis, but the paper needs more claims to explainall the evidence.)

    Q: Can evidence prove that you are right?A: It can, but it doesn't have to...

    Corroborationproving the validity of a claimis one of the functions of evidence, but it isn't the only

    one and it isn't automatic. The relationship between evidence and claimsthe thought connections that haveoccurred to youvirtually always need to be explained. In fact, to prove comes from the Latin verb meaning to

    test. Each time you cite evidence or make a claim, your thesis is tested and your task is to connect them

    but how?

    1. Learn to recognize and support unsubstantiated assertions. (add evidence to every claim)

    The word unsubstantiated means without substancean unsubstantiated claim isn't

    necessarily false, it just offers no concrete stuff upon which the claim is based. More

    important, unsubstantiated claims deprive you of details, leaving both reader and writer

    stuck in a set of abstractions.

    2. Make details speak. (explain the relationship between evidence and claim)

    Your writing isn't about an innocent set of facts; you are writing about your own

    process of thinking. Thus, when you present the details that sparked your thought process,

    you need to accompany them with your thoughts. This is the meaning of making the implicit

    explicit; the evidence you cite might imply a certain interpretation on your part, but that

    interpretation is a necessary component of your paper2!

    Developing a thesis is more than repeating an idea; You need to build a

    paper by analyzing evidence in depth.

    1 Adapted from David Rosenwasser and Jill Stephen, Writing Analytically. 137-162

    2 In the terminology of Young, Becker and Pike, the interpretation which you argue in your paper would be called your

    unique view, and its implication would arise from the way your view of the unknown unitizes it. This is why the

    explanation of your interpretation is so important: without it the reader does not know what you think the examples

    'really' are.

  • 8/3/2019 Evidence and Claims HO

    2/2

    CompLit 122

    11/04/2009

    1 on 10 versus 10 on 1: or, developing a thesis is better than repeating an

    ideaAnalysis is the search for meaningful

    pattern. It attends to detail, traces

    impressions back to causes and searches out

    further questions rather than rushing to

    answers.

    Demonstration is the attempt to prove that a

    generalization is generally true. It fails to pay

    careful attention to detail, to incorporate

    evidence that counters its claim, and provide

    answers for simple questions instead of

    discovering interesting topics.

    The problem: 1 on 10

    1 on 10 describes the organization of a demonstration; the writer of a 1 on 10 essay provides

    one idea in ten different instances. (Think the five-paragraph essay extended to 12

    paragraphs.) The writer who reasserts the same idea about each example only produces a list,

    not a pieced of developed thinking, and the thesis never evolves or changes in complexity.

    ...

    The solution: 10 on 1

    10 on 1, in contrast, describes the organization of analysis; the writer narrows in focus and

    then analyzes in depth. He or she makes 103 points about a single representative issue or

    example. (The 1 is the unknown of your thesis, while the 10 are the points you make about

    that unknown) The result is an analysis which leads the writer to draw out as much meaning

    as possible from his or her examples.

    ...

    3 Or more than 10, or fewerhowever many points are necessary.

    Overly general

    claim

    Example 2 Example 3 Example 4 Example 10Conclusion

    Example 1

    Point 1

    Point 2

    Point 3

    Point 4

    Point 10

    Representative

    Example

    Conclusion Example 2 etc.

    The organization of 1 on 10

    The organization of

    10 on 1