18
1 as Jornadas do Projeto INTERACT Evaluation of the residual agro-forestry biomass existing in the Ave and Sabor watershed Bolseira: Teresa Enes Orientadores: José Lousada, José Aranha e Domingos Lopes

Evaluation of the residual agro-forestry biomass existing

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    1

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Evaluation of the residual agro-forestry biomass existing

1as Jornadas do Projeto INTERACT

Evaluation of the residual agro-forestry biomass existing in the Ave and

Sabor watershedBolseira: Teresa Enes

Orientadores: José Lousada, José Aranha e Domingos Lopes

Page 2: Evaluation of the residual agro-forestry biomass existing

UTA

D -

16

no

vemb

ro’1

6INTERACT - Integrative Research in Environment, Agro-Chains and Technology

Research Line 3 – By-products, Waste Management and Valorisationof Agrarian Chain Production

• Project 4 – Biomass valorisation

Grant - BI/UTAD/INTERACT/BEST/227/2016

BIO-ECONOMY AND SUSTAINABILITY (BEST)

2Teresa Enes 2016

Page 3: Evaluation of the residual agro-forestry biomass existing

UTA

D -

16

no

vemb

ro’1

6

Introduction

Agro-forest systems support fundamental economic activities to theNorth of Portugal, such as the production of wine, fruits, cereals,livestock, forest biomass for wood or energy purposes.

Domestic production of renewable energy from agro-forestry biomass is extremely important:

• represents less environmental impacts;

• They encourage the development of the national economy and diversify energy sources;

• helps to reduce CO2 emissions helping to meet the Kyoto commitments;

• reduces the risk of forest fires.

3Teresa Enes 2016

Page 4: Evaluation of the residual agro-forestry biomass existing

UTA

D -

16

no

vemb

ro’1

6

Objectives

1) Evaluation and characterization of the different types of agro-forestry biomass in Northern Portugal;

2) Evaluation of the efficiency of different energy use processes for each type of biomass;

3) Development of technologies for combustion, pyrolysis and gasification appropriate to each type of biomass;

4) Socio-economic evaluation of the use of agro-forestry biomass as a substitute for fossil fuels.

4Teresa Enes 2016

Page 5: Evaluation of the residual agro-forestry biomass existing

UTA

D -

16

no

vemb

ro’1

6Study area location

5

Teresa Enes 2016

Page 6: Evaluation of the residual agro-forestry biomass existing

UTA

D -

16

no

vemb

ro’1

6

Methodologies

• Biophysical characterization of the study area:

Altimetry, Slope, Aspect, Climatology, road network and forest fires temporal occurrence.

• Land cover analyses (COS 2007)

Quantification of Forested and Agricultural areas.

6Teresa Enes 2016

Page 7: Evaluation of the residual agro-forestry biomass existing

UTA

D -

16

no

vemb

ro’1

6Methodologies (objective 1)

Agricultural areas

Identification and distribution of mainspecies/crops

Estimation of the area occupied by each species/crops

Estimates of residual biomass by means ofthe Páscoa et al. 2006 method, previews

presented

Literature Review on annual average residual productions for each crop – National

Agricultural Directory

Area * residual biomass = Total anual Production

Forested areas

Residual Biomassfrom Forested areas

Residual Biomass fromAgricultural areas 7

Teresa Enes 2016

Page 8: Evaluation of the residual agro-forestry biomass existing

UTA

D -

16

no

vemb

ro’1

6

Collection of forest and agricultural waste samples

Evaluation of ChemicalComposition

(CHONS)

Evaluation of the heating value

Methodologies (objective 2 - Evaluation of the efficiency of different energy use processes for each type of biomass )

8Teresa Enes 2016

Page 9: Evaluation of the residual agro-forestry biomass existing

UTA

D -

16

no

vemb

ro’1

6Preliminary Results on study area analysis: Slope

Slope classes (%) Area (%)

0 - 5 14

5 - 10 26

10 - 15 22

15 - 20 15

20- 25 10

25 - 30 6

>30 7

9Teresa Enes 2016

Page 10: Evaluation of the residual agro-forestry biomass existing

UTA

D -

16

no

vemb

ro’1

6Preliminary Results on study area analysis: Slope

Slope classes (%) Area (%)

0 - 5 10

5 - 10 23

10 - 15 20

15 - 20 15

20- 25 10

25 - 30 7

>30 15

10Teresa Enes 2016

Page 11: Evaluation of the residual agro-forestry biomass existing

UTA

D -

16

no

vemb

ro’1

6

Forested areas – 70 192 ha

(50% Total area)

Agricultural areas – 41 000 ha

(30% Total area)

Preliminary Results on study area analysis: Land cover

11Teresa Enes 2016

Page 12: Evaluation of the residual agro-forestry biomass existing

UTA

D -

16

no

vemb

ro’1

6

Forested areas – 145 000 ha (60% total area)

Agricultural areas – 89 000 ha (37% total)

Preliminary Results on study area analysis: Land cover

12Teresa Enes 2016

Page 13: Evaluation of the residual agro-forestry biomass existing

UTA

D -

16

no

vemb

ro’1

6Maritime pine stands location within the study area

Maritime pine – 3 280 ha

(5% total forested area)

• Pure stands

• Seedling and mature stands

13Teresa Enes 2016

Page 14: Evaluation of the residual agro-forestry biomass existing

UTA

D -

16

no

vemb

ro’1

6Maritime pine stands location within the study area

Maritime pine– 13 000 ha

(9% total forested Area)

14

• Pure stands

• Seedling and mature stands

Teresa Enes 2016

Page 15: Evaluation of the residual agro-forestry biomass existing

UTA

D -

16

no

vemb

ro’1

6Shrublands location within the study area

Shrublands: 12 190 ha

(17% Forested Area)

15

Teresa Enes 2016

Page 16: Evaluation of the residual agro-forestry biomass existing

UTA

D -

16

no

vemb

ro’1

6Shrublands location within the study area

Shrublands: 70 192 ha

(49% Forested Area)

16Teresa Enes 2016

Page 17: Evaluation of the residual agro-forestry biomass existing

UTA

D -

16

no

vemb

ro’1

6

Previews presented studies about North of Portugal

Age (years)

N (trees/ha)

h (m)

biomass(ton/ha)

Maritime pine (natural regeneration)

5 4800 2 60

Maritime pine 20 600 18 6,3

biomass (30% moisture)

Tops and branches

RegionAge

(years)biomass

(ton/ha)

Trás os Montes 5 11,2

Minho 5 6,4

Shrub landsForested lands

17Teresa Enes 2016

Page 18: Evaluation of the residual agro-forestry biomass existing

UTA

D -

16

no

vemb

ro’1

6Ave general view landscape

Sabor general view landscape

Thank you …. 18

Teresa Enes

Teresa Enes

Teresa Enes 2016