Upload
faith-maloney
View
228
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Evaluation of Starter Pack 2Technical background
Statistical Services Centre
University of ReadingMalawi
23 August 2000
Background
• Objectives of Starter Pack
• Difficulty in measuring the net impact of Starter Pack
Objectives of Starter Pack
• To increase food production, in particular for maize
• To combat household food insecurity, particularly in the most vulnerable farm families
• Provision of legume crops to help improve soil fertility and diet
•
Difficulty in measuring the net impact of Starter Pack
• Difficulty in finding a baseline for comparison
• Year to year changes affected by weather• “All farmers” were eligible• Variation in size of effects depending on
farmer characteristics such as wealth, sex, location, etc
•
How to assess the impact of SP?
• Looking at the multi-dimensional aspects of the impact of Starter Pack
• Triangulating the estimates of production and months of food produced through– Year to year comparisons
– Recipients versus non-recipients
– Farmers’ perceptions and experience
– Independent measures of ‘impact’ from each module in the evaluation.
Modular approach
• Module 1: Agronomic Survey• Module 2: Microeconomic Impact and Willingness
to Pay • Module 3: Gender and Intra-household Distribution• Module 4: Sustainable Agriculture and Biodiversity• Module 5: Ground Truth Study for SP Logistics
Unit Starter Pack Register•
Selection of sites
• Random selection of villages and households within villages
• Stratification by FEWS poverty and food security indices (M2), food security index (M3) and sphere of influence clusters (M4)
• An optimal number of sites has been selected within the resources available
• These elements will make it possible to reach generalisable conclusions and capture variability
Module 1: Agronomic Survey
• Consultant: National Statistical Office
• Coverage: National
• 200 Enumeration Areas covering all RDPs in the country
• 2992 households visited
• 3527 individuals interviewed
• Methodology: household survey and field visits
Module 2: Microeconomic Impact and Willingness to Pay• Consultant: Mzuzu ADD, Ministry of Agriculture. Team
leader: Mr Francis Nyirenda
• participatory preliminary study followed by a household survey
• The study visited 120 villages distributed in 30 EPAs. Stratification by Poverty Index and Sphere of influence (VAM 1996). 1,200 households visited
• Quantitative and qualitative methodsof research were combined
•
Module 2Map of EPAs coveredand Number of villages visited
Module 3: Gender and Intra-household Distribution• Consultant: Chancellor College. Gender Studies and
Outreach Unit. Team Leader: Dr Lucy Binauli
• Preliminary phase based on participatory workshops
• Main phase based on restricted participatory methods combined with a short questionnaire
• Visited 48 villages in 24 EPAs throughout the country
• Consistent methodology and structured information recording used in all sites to allow integration of results
•
Module 3Map of EPAs coveredand Number of villages visited
Module 4: Sustainable Agriculture and Biodiversity
• Consultants: Elizabeth Cromwell (ODI), Patrick Kambewa (Chancellor College), Richard Mwanza (Concern Universal), Rowland Chirwa (Chitedze Research Station) and Kwera (NGO)
• Participatory study of 30 villages randomly selected in the whole of Malawi using the VAM (1996) classification of EPAs by Sphere of Influence
•
Module 4Map of EPAs coveredand Number of villages visited
Module 5: Ground Truth Study for SPLU
• Consultants: McNewman Msowoya, Mzuzu ADD, Peter Wingfield-Digby, Ian Wilson
• Census of 54 villages
• Comparison with the registration data for Starter Pack 2
• Comparison with the census 1998 results
• Assessment of the registration process in those villages.
Module 5Map of EPAs covered