16
10/28/22 Wilfred Drew, Associate L ibrarian, SUNY Morrisvill 1 GNED104 -- Library Research Methods Evaluation Of Your sources

Evaluation of Information

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

From GNED 104 course - Research - course I created at Morrisville State College

Citation preview

Page 1: Evaluation of Information

04/11/23 Wilfred Drew, Associate Librarian, SUNY Morrisville

1

GNED104 -- Library Research Methods

EvaluationOf

Your sources

Page 2: Evaluation of Information

04/11/23 Wilfred Drew, Associate Librarian, SUNY Morrisville

2

Evaluation of Your Sources.

Books, magazines, websites Criteria

• Authority/credibility • Content

Page 3: Evaluation of Information

04/11/23 Wilfred Drew, Associate Librarian, SUNY Morrisville

3

Evaluation of Your Sources -- Books

Authority/credibility 1. Is author's name included? 2. What is the expertise of the author? Is it related to the topic of the book?

A. EducationB. Profession C. Other publications

Page 4: Evaluation of Information

04/11/23 Wilfred Drew, Associate Librarian, SUNY Morrisville

4

Evaluation of Your Sources -- Books

Authority/credibility 3. What is the author's opinion? Is it backed up with facts (statistics, historical data, etc.)?4. Who publishes the item? Is there hidden "agenda," or a cause, or is it just a business?

Page 5: Evaluation of Information

04/11/23 Wilfred Drew, Associate Librarian, SUNY Morrisville

5

Evaluation of Your Sources -- Books

Authority/credibility 5. Is it a reliable source? Why? Does it

include a bibliography or works cited page?A. Check book reviewsB. Is it listed in other sources?

Page 6: Evaluation of Information

04/11/23 Wilfred Drew, Associate Librarian, SUNY Morrisville

6

Evaluation of Your Sources -- Books

Content1. When was item written?

A. Older material may be out of dateB. Older material may be useful for

historical research2. Is the content meaningful and useful? Why ?3. Is there evidence of any bias, either by the author or the publisher? Bias is not necessarily bad if it is obvious

Page 7: Evaluation of Information

04/11/23 Wilfred Drew, Associate Librarian, SUNY Morrisville

7

Evaluation of Your Sources -- Books

Content4. Is it objective or subjective (facts, or opinion/creative)?5. Is the information accurate? Why? 6. Is it primary source material? Did the person witness the event (primary) or just writing about it (secondary)?

Page 8: Evaluation of Information

04/11/23 Wilfred Drew, Associate Librarian, SUNY Morrisville

8

Evaluation of Your Sources -- Magazines

Authority/credibility 1. Is author's name included? 2. What is the expertise of the author?

(Education, profession, publications,etc.)

3. What is the author's opinion is? Is it backed up with facts (statistics, historical data, etc.)?

Page 9: Evaluation of Information

04/11/23 Wilfred Drew, Associate Librarian, SUNY Morrisville

9

Evaluation of Your Sources -- Magazines

Authority/credibility 4. Who publishes the item? Is there hidden

"agenda," or a cause, or is it just a business? [For example, Washington Monthly (a newspaper) is owned and published by the Unification Church]5. Is it a reliable source? Why? Does it include a bibliography or works cited page?

Page 10: Evaluation of Information

04/11/23 Wilfred Drew, Associate Librarian, SUNY Morrisville

10

Evaluation of Your Sources -- Magazines

Content1. When was item written?

A. Technical topics need current materialB. Older magazines may be useful for

certain topics2. Is the content meaningful and useful? Why ?

Page 11: Evaluation of Information

04/11/23 Wilfred Drew, Associate Librarian, SUNY Morrisville

11

Evaluation of Your Sources -- Magazines

Content3. Is there evidence of any bias, either by the author or the publisher? 4. Is it objective or subjective (facts, or opinion/creative)?

A. Newspapers such as National Inquirer or the Star are not considered factual!!

B. Many magazine articles in popular magazines may appear factual but are actually more subjective

Page 12: Evaluation of Information

04/11/23 Wilfred Drew, Associate Librarian, SUNY Morrisville

12

Evaluation of Your Sources -- Magazines

Content5. Is the information accurate? Why? 6. Is it primary source material?

A. Newspapers may be primary or secondary. If reporter witnessed the event in person then it is primary, if not it is secondary.

B. Be careful. Some articles may appear to be primary sources but are really secondary.

Page 13: Evaluation of Information

04/11/23 Wilfred Drew, Associate Librarian, SUNY Morrisville

13

Evaluation of Your Sources -- Web Pages

Authority/credibility 1. Is author's name included?

A. You must know who wrote or who is responsible for a website.

B. Do not use a site if there is no obvious author or group responsible for it.

2. What is the expertise of the author? A. Anyone can put up a webpage on any topic!!B. Expertise must be evaluated when looking at

web sites.

Page 14: Evaluation of Information

04/11/23 Wilfred Drew, Associate Librarian, SUNY Morrisville

14

Evaluation of Your Sources -- Web Pages

Authority/credibility 3. What is the author's opinion? Is it backed up with facts (statistics, historical data, etc.)? What is the source of the statistics or other facts?4. Who publishes the item? Is there hidden "agenda," or a cause, or is it just a business? (N.R.A. website would not give a balanced view on gun control)5. Is it a reliable source? Why? What other sites point to it?

Page 15: Evaluation of Information

04/11/23 Wilfred Drew, Associate Librarian, SUNY Morrisville

15

Evaluation of Your Sources -- Webpages

Content1. When was item written?

A. Many web sites never get updated.B. Don’t use a web site if there is no date for

when it was created or updated.

2. Is the content meaningful and useful? Why ?3. Is there evidence of any bias, either by the author or the publisher?

Page 16: Evaluation of Information

04/11/23 Wilfred Drew, Associate Librarian, SUNY Morrisville

16

Evaluation of Your Sources -- Webpages

Content4. Is it objective or subjective (facts, or opinion/creative)? Where is the web site housed? Who is the host site?5. Is the information accurate? Why? 6. Is it primary source material? Is the author involved in the events or simply restating ideas from others?