39
Evaluation of Geomorphic Reclamation Performance and Models in the Southwestern United States M. Stone, J. Stormont, E. Epp, C. Byrne, S. Rahman, R. Powell, W. Rider, and S. Perkins Presented by Colin Byrne, May 20 th , 2014 Advances in Geomorphic Reclamation at Coal Mine Sites: A Technical Interactive Forum and Field Tour May 20-22, 2014

Evaluation of Geomorphic Reclamation and Models …...Evaluation of Geomorphic Reclamation Performance and Models in the Southwestern United States M. Stone, J. Stormont, E. Epp, C

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    3

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Evaluation of Geomorphic Reclamation and Models …...Evaluation of Geomorphic Reclamation Performance and Models in the Southwestern United States M. Stone, J. Stormont, E. Epp, C

Evaluation of Geomorphic Reclamation Performance and Models in the

Southwestern United States M. Stone, J. Stormont, E. Epp, C. Byrne, S.

Rahman, R. Powell, W. Rider, and S. Perkins

Presented by Colin Byrne, May 20th, 2014

Advances in Geomorphic Reclamation at Coal Mine Sites: A Technical Interactive Forum and Field Tour

May 20-22, 2014

Page 2: Evaluation of Geomorphic Reclamation and Models …...Evaluation of Geomorphic Reclamation Performance and Models in the Southwestern United States M. Stone, J. Stormont, E. Epp, C

Study Background • 2 year study began in August 2012 • Funded by Office of Surface Mining • Working in collaboration with BHP-

Billiton o La Plata Mine

• Results and Conclusions currently being developed

Page 3: Evaluation of Geomorphic Reclamation and Models …...Evaluation of Geomorphic Reclamation Performance and Models in the Southwestern United States M. Stone, J. Stormont, E. Epp, C

La Plata Mine, New Mexico

• Open pit mine that produced coal until 2002 • Over 800 hectares in size • Approx. 6000 ft elevation • Approx. 12 inches of annual precipitation • Reclaimed using GeoFluvTM approach

Page 4: Evaluation of Geomorphic Reclamation and Models …...Evaluation of Geomorphic Reclamation Performance and Models in the Southwestern United States M. Stone, J. Stormont, E. Epp, C

Objectives 1. Evaluate the effectiveness of geomorphic

reclamation at producing conditions that closely mimic those found in natural analog basins and channels

2. Assess the effectiveness of watershed models in informing the geomorphic reclamation process o Water Erosion Prediction Project (WEPP) o Sediment, Erosion, Discharge by Computer Aided Design (SEDCAD)

3. Assess seed germination potential based on soil characteristics using the Hydrus 1-D model

Page 5: Evaluation of Geomorphic Reclamation and Models …...Evaluation of Geomorphic Reclamation Performance and Models in the Southwestern United States M. Stone, J. Stormont, E. Epp, C

Selection of Watersheds • Three watersheds selected due to similarities in

slope, aspect, and size o Well Vegetated Reclaimed Site o Moderately Vegetated Reclaimed Site o Undisturbed Natural Site

• Watersheds sit within 2.5 km of one another

Page 6: Evaluation of Geomorphic Reclamation and Models …...Evaluation of Geomorphic Reclamation Performance and Models in the Southwestern United States M. Stone, J. Stormont, E. Epp, C

Selection of Watersheds

Undisturbed Natural Watershed

Well Vegetated Reclaimed Watershed

Moderately Vegetated Reclaimed Watershed

Page 7: Evaluation of Geomorphic Reclamation and Models …...Evaluation of Geomorphic Reclamation Performance and Models in the Southwestern United States M. Stone, J. Stormont, E. Epp, C

Objective 1

• Evaluate the effectiveness of geomorphic reclamation at producing conditions that closely mimic those found in natural analog basins and channels

Page 8: Evaluation of Geomorphic Reclamation and Models …...Evaluation of Geomorphic Reclamation Performance and Models in the Southwestern United States M. Stone, J. Stormont, E. Epp, C

Field Sampling • In situ soil measurements

o Temperature o Moisture content o Vegetation o Infiltration rates

• Disturbed soil sampling o Particle size distribution o Specific gravity o Organic matter o Cation exchange capacity

• Undisturbed soil sampling o Saturated hydraulic conductivity o Water retention curves

• Check-dams installed • V-notch weirs installed

Page 9: Evaluation of Geomorphic Reclamation and Models …...Evaluation of Geomorphic Reclamation Performance and Models in the Southwestern United States M. Stone, J. Stormont, E. Epp, C

Field Sampling

Page 10: Evaluation of Geomorphic Reclamation and Models …...Evaluation of Geomorphic Reclamation Performance and Models in the Southwestern United States M. Stone, J. Stormont, E. Epp, C

Site Soil Characteristics % Gravel % Sand

% Silt % Clay

Page 11: Evaluation of Geomorphic Reclamation and Models …...Evaluation of Geomorphic Reclamation Performance and Models in the Southwestern United States M. Stone, J. Stormont, E. Epp, C

Site Soil Characteristics

Page 12: Evaluation of Geomorphic Reclamation and Models …...Evaluation of Geomorphic Reclamation Performance and Models in the Southwestern United States M. Stone, J. Stormont, E. Epp, C

Site Soil Characteristics

Organic Matter

Cation Exchange Capacity

Page 13: Evaluation of Geomorphic Reclamation and Models …...Evaluation of Geomorphic Reclamation Performance and Models in the Southwestern United States M. Stone, J. Stormont, E. Epp, C

Rainfall-Runoff Field Data

Page 14: Evaluation of Geomorphic Reclamation and Models …...Evaluation of Geomorphic Reclamation Performance and Models in the Southwestern United States M. Stone, J. Stormont, E. Epp, C

Objective 2 • Assess the effectiveness of watershed

models in informing the geomorphic reclamation process o How well do the models predict runoff and erosion totals

from sites? o How much field collected data is necessary to produce

reasonable results?

Page 15: Evaluation of Geomorphic Reclamation and Models …...Evaluation of Geomorphic Reclamation Performance and Models in the Southwestern United States M. Stone, J. Stormont, E. Epp, C

Water Erosion Prediction Project (WEPP)

• Development by the USDA began in 1985 to expand upon the Universal Soil Loss Equation (USLE) o USLE – gives annual erosion predictions o WEPP – spatial and temporal information about erosion and

deposition on a hillslope or watershed

Page 16: Evaluation of Geomorphic Reclamation and Models …...Evaluation of Geomorphic Reclamation Performance and Models in the Southwestern United States M. Stone, J. Stormont, E. Epp, C

Applications of WEPP • Agricultural Sites • Forested Sites • Rangeland Sites • Geomorphic Reclamation Sites at La Plata Mine

Page 17: Evaluation of Geomorphic Reclamation and Models …...Evaluation of Geomorphic Reclamation Performance and Models in the Southwestern United States M. Stone, J. Stormont, E. Epp, C

WEPP Overview Model Inputs

o Topography • Hillslope • Watershed

o Channels, hillslope, impoundments, outlets

o Climate data o Soil data o Vegetation management

Model Output

o Runoff Volumes and Hydrographs o Sediment yields o Characteristics of Eroded Sediment

Page 18: Evaluation of Geomorphic Reclamation and Models …...Evaluation of Geomorphic Reclamation Performance and Models in the Southwestern United States M. Stone, J. Stormont, E. Epp, C

Delineation of Watersheds

Page 19: Evaluation of Geomorphic Reclamation and Models …...Evaluation of Geomorphic Reclamation Performance and Models in the Southwestern United States M. Stone, J. Stormont, E. Epp, C

Study Watersheds at La Plata Mine

0 to 100 % slope

Page 20: Evaluation of Geomorphic Reclamation and Models …...Evaluation of Geomorphic Reclamation Performance and Models in the Southwestern United States M. Stone, J. Stormont, E. Epp, C

Importing Watersheds to WEPP Model

Page 21: Evaluation of Geomorphic Reclamation and Models …...Evaluation of Geomorphic Reclamation Performance and Models in the Southwestern United States M. Stone, J. Stormont, E. Epp, C

Defining Hillslopes Hillslope defined by cross-section taken in Arc-GIS

Hillslope defined by 10 equidistant slope points

Hillslope defined by simplified S-shape using average slope

Page 22: Evaluation of Geomorphic Reclamation and Models …...Evaluation of Geomorphic Reclamation Performance and Models in the Southwestern United States M. Stone, J. Stormont, E. Epp, C

WEPP Watershed Approaches • Natural, Well Vegetated, & Moderately Vegetated

o Cross-section Hillslope o 10 slope points Hillslope o Simplified S-shape Hillslope

Page 23: Evaluation of Geomorphic Reclamation and Models …...Evaluation of Geomorphic Reclamation Performance and Models in the Southwestern United States M. Stone, J. Stormont, E. Epp, C

Initial WEPP Results

• WEPP model unable to handle the complexities of the cross-sectional description of the hillslope

Page 24: Evaluation of Geomorphic Reclamation and Models …...Evaluation of Geomorphic Reclamation Performance and Models in the Southwestern United States M. Stone, J. Stormont, E. Epp, C

WEPP Runoff Prediction

Page 25: Evaluation of Geomorphic Reclamation and Models …...Evaluation of Geomorphic Reclamation Performance and Models in the Southwestern United States M. Stone, J. Stormont, E. Epp, C

WEPP Erosion Prediction – Hillslope Approaches

Page 26: Evaluation of Geomorphic Reclamation and Models …...Evaluation of Geomorphic Reclamation Performance and Models in the Southwestern United States M. Stone, J. Stormont, E. Epp, C

WEPP Erosion Prediction – Watershed Approaches

Page 27: Evaluation of Geomorphic Reclamation and Models …...Evaluation of Geomorphic Reclamation Performance and Models in the Southwestern United States M. Stone, J. Stormont, E. Epp, C

Effects of Increased Vegetation at Reclaimed Sites

Page 28: Evaluation of Geomorphic Reclamation and Models …...Evaluation of Geomorphic Reclamation Performance and Models in the Southwestern United States M. Stone, J. Stormont, E. Epp, C

GeoWEPP • Geospatial interface for the WEPP model

developed at the University at Buffalo

• Works as an add-on to ArcMap

• A DEM of the modeled site is required

• Optional layers include: o Soils layer o Vegetation/Land Use file

Page 29: Evaluation of Geomorphic Reclamation and Models …...Evaluation of Geomorphic Reclamation Performance and Models in the Southwestern United States M. Stone, J. Stormont, E. Epp, C

GeoWEPP – Best Calibration Inputs

Page 30: Evaluation of Geomorphic Reclamation and Models …...Evaluation of Geomorphic Reclamation Performance and Models in the Southwestern United States M. Stone, J. Stormont, E. Epp, C

GeoWEPP – Flowpaths and Hillslopes

Natural Site

Well Vegetated Site Moderately Vegetated Site

Page 31: Evaluation of Geomorphic Reclamation and Models …...Evaluation of Geomorphic Reclamation Performance and Models in the Southwestern United States M. Stone, J. Stormont, E. Epp, C

Spatial Erosion Prediction Natural Site Well Vegetated Site Moderately Vegetated Site

Page 32: Evaluation of Geomorphic Reclamation and Models …...Evaluation of Geomorphic Reclamation Performance and Models in the Southwestern United States M. Stone, J. Stormont, E. Epp, C

Results RMSE(GeoWEPP) = 18.3 RMSE(SEDCAD) = 25.1

Page 33: Evaluation of Geomorphic Reclamation and Models …...Evaluation of Geomorphic Reclamation Performance and Models in the Southwestern United States M. Stone, J. Stormont, E. Epp, C

Objective 3

• Assess seed germination potential based on soil temperature and moisture content using the Hydrus 1-D model

Page 34: Evaluation of Geomorphic Reclamation and Models …...Evaluation of Geomorphic Reclamation Performance and Models in the Southwestern United States M. Stone, J. Stormont, E. Epp, C

Soil Hydraulic Properties

θr =residual water content θs =saturated water content h =pressure head α, n, m =empirical coefficient

• Van Ganuchten unsaturated hydraulic properties

• Field test and laboratory experiments -Tension infiltrometer test -Falling head test -Hanging column test -Pressure plate test -Dew point potentiometer test

• Determination technique -Curve fitting by RETC -Inverse simulation by HYDRUS 2D

Page 35: Evaluation of Geomorphic Reclamation and Models …...Evaluation of Geomorphic Reclamation Performance and Models in the Southwestern United States M. Stone, J. Stormont, E. Epp, C

Soil Moisture Measurement and Modeling

• Volumetric water content by TDR • Solving Richard’s unsaturated flow equation by

HYDRUS 1D

Page 36: Evaluation of Geomorphic Reclamation and Models …...Evaluation of Geomorphic Reclamation Performance and Models in the Southwestern United States M. Stone, J. Stormont, E. Epp, C

Determination of Germination Potential

θHT = Hydrothermal time (MPa-degree-days) tg = Germination time for g fraction Tb = Threshold temperature ψb = Threshold water potential PTG = Progress towards germination

1/PTG/hour= 1/tg/24

Germination of bottlebrush squirreltail

Wet weather

North aspect

Blue grama

Cheat grass

South aspect

Blue grama

Cheat grass

Dry weather

North aspect

Blue grama

Cheat grass

South aspect

Blue grama

Cheat grass

Page 37: Evaluation of Geomorphic Reclamation and Models …...Evaluation of Geomorphic Reclamation Performance and Models in the Southwestern United States M. Stone, J. Stormont, E. Epp, C

Conclusions • WEPP hillslopes and watersheds can not be too complex, as the model

will over predict sediment yields • Based on soil properties, topography, and vegetation, WEPP predicts the

reclaimed sites will perform in a similar manner to surrounding natural landscapes

• Calibration of models is difficult and results have proven insignificant, perhaps due to climate or soil densities below the surface

• GeoWEPP may aid in a qualitative assessment of site performance, providing information about which areas are most susceptible to runoff and eroded sediment production

• Hydrus 1-D is able to produce soil moisture contents within the range measured throughout the course of the study. Application of this data to study seed germination potential is underway

Page 38: Evaluation of Geomorphic Reclamation and Models …...Evaluation of Geomorphic Reclamation Performance and Models in the Southwestern United States M. Stone, J. Stormont, E. Epp, C

Acknowledgements

Page 39: Evaluation of Geomorphic Reclamation and Models …...Evaluation of Geomorphic Reclamation Performance and Models in the Southwestern United States M. Stone, J. Stormont, E. Epp, C

Questions?