Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
1
Evaluation of compressor durability with new low GWP
Blend Refrigerants
William R. Hill, MACRAE, LLC
Andreas Rittsche, ILK Dresden
TMSS 0023
2
Background
Supplier Evaluations and Results ◦ Test Schedule
◦ Compressor Wear
◦ Oil Analysis
Results of testing at ILK Dresden ◦ Test Schedule
◦ Refrigerant analysis
◦ Oil Analysis
◦ Other Observations
Conclusions
Overview of Presentation
TMSS 0023
3
Background
TMSS 0023
Members of the MAC Refrigerant Blend
Cooperative Research Program
sponsored and supported these
activities ◦ Comparative durability tests were run with
R134a and AC6 refrigerant to confirm that
AC6 is acceptable for use in mobile air
conditioning systems
Compressor durability at supplier partners were run
Compressor durability was also run at ILK
Specially developed test rig, running R134a and
AC6 side-by-side
4
Supplier Test Schedules
TMSS 0023
Each compressor supplier [shown below]
from the MRB CRP selected a test schedule
to do this preliminary durability assessment
Test done in supplier lab at their expense
AC6 refrigerant supplier by Mexichem
R134a refrigerant supplied by testing lab
Oil for use with each compressor/refrigerant
combination selected by supplier
Evaluation criteria base on each supplier normal
criteria for acceptance
5
Supplier A
TMSS 0023
Test Schedule
Parameter Cycle 1 Cycle 2 Cycle 3
Time [h] 333 333 333
Compressor Speed [RPM] 1000 4000 6000
Evaporation Pressure [kPa] 450 300 280
Condensing Pressure [kPa] 2900 2300 2250
R134a AC6
Capacity
Not Run
Efficiency
Noise
Wear
Results
Hardware
Compressor Medium Variable compressor
System Small Car MAC system
6
Supplier B
TMSS 0023
Test Schedule
R134a AC6
Capacity
Efficiency
Noise
Wear
Results
Hardware
Compressor Medium Variable compressor
System Water Cooled Condenser
7
Supplier C
TMSS 0023
Test Schedule
R134a AC6
Capacity
Efficiency
Noise
Wear
Results
Compressor Small Variable compressor System Small Car MAC system
Hardware
8
Supplier D
TMSS 0023
Test Schedule
Parameter
Time [h] 400
Compressor Speed [RPM] 1000
Compressor Discharge Temp [deg C] 450
Condensing Pressure [kPa] 3100
R134a AC6
Capacity
Efficiency
Noise
Wear
Hardware
Results
Compressor Medium Variable compressor
System Water Cooled Condenser
9
Conclusions - Suppliers
TMSS 0023
Initial screening tests have been completed
in compressor supplier labs with AC6 as
compared to R134a
No significant differences were noted in the
performance of the compressors with these
two refrigerant alternatives during these tests
10
Durability Test at ILK Dresden
TMSS 0023
Main Objective was to analyze any breakdown of the
refrigerant and oil that may occur at severe
conditions over extended operation
Desiccant was saturated with H2O at the beginning
of the test to simulate worst case conditions for
break down of refrigerant and oil
Conditions for compressor were high load at three
different speeds
Two compressors were run at once with identical
systems AC6 refrigerant in one system
R134a refrigerant in the parallel system
ILK Experimental Set-up
11
12
Tests at ILK Dresden
TMSS 0023
Test Schedule
Parameter Cycle 1 Cycle 2 Cycle 3
Time [h] 333 333 333
Compressor Speed [RPM] 1000 4000 6000
Evaporation Pressure [kPa] 450 300 280
Condensing Pressure [kPa] 2900 2300 2250
Hardware
Compressor Medium Variable compressor
System Midsize car MAC system
Desiccant Saturated with H2O at beginning of test
Compressor Supplier X
R134a AC6
Refrigerant
Oil System Components
Compressor
Results
13
Compressor A / Oil A AC6 Refrigerant Contaminates
TMSS 0023
Major Contaminates are those
expected with AC6
No significant change over time
14
Compressor A / Oil A
R134a Refrigerant Contaminates
TMSS 0023
Major Contaminates are those expected with R134a
No significant change over time
15 TMSS 0023
Oil analysis During Test
No significant
differences in the
results from the two
refrigerants
16
Compressors after Test
PAPER #
AC6 R134a
17
Conclusions
TMSS 0023
No difference in system, component wear,
refrigerant, or oil, were detected in system
test at ILK
Initial screening tests for compressor
durability were successful
AC6 is acceptable to proceed to more
extensive durability testing once oil
optimization is completed