15
Final meeting Palermo, July 4 5 th 2012 NO PROFIT EUROPE NO PROFIT EUROPE GRUNDTVIG PARTNERSHIPS

EVALUATION: FINAL REPORT

  • Upload
    bernie

  • View
    37

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

GRUNDTVIG PARTNERSHIPS. EVALUATION: FINAL REPORT. NO PROFIT EUROPE. Final meeting Palermo, July 4 – 5 th 2012. INTRODUCTION - PREMISES. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: EVALUATION:  FINAL REPORT

Final meetingPalermo, July 4 – 5th 2012

NO PROFIT EUROPENO PROFIT EUROPE

GRUNDTVIG PARTNERSHIPS

Page 2: EVALUATION:  FINAL REPORT

Evaluation and monitoring is a transversal activity applied within working teams and partnerships with the aim of creating the conditions to continuously check the project work in progress and the achievement of expected interim and final outcomes, so as:

•to highlight the possible divergences between what has been planned and actually realised;

•to identify the risk areas;

•to adopt the proper measure to ensure the achievement of goals defined

2

INTRODUCTION - PREMISES

Page 3: EVALUATION:  FINAL REPORT

Evaluation and Monitoring of “NO PROFIT EUROPE” project activities,

have been implemented through a desk analysis action, using semi-

structured grids sent to all partners, by e-mail, to be filled in and

returned to coordinator PEGASO Soc. Coop. Sociale (in charge of

evaluation and monitoring).

In this case the grids will ask for information concerning the work in progress of:

•Activities (meetings);•Approach of partners•Satisfaction level of each partner;•Correspondence between expectancies and activities actually made .

3

INTRODUCTION - PREMISES

Page 4: EVALUATION:  FINAL REPORT

•PEGASO Soc.Coop. Sociale, Palermo (IT) (Coordinator)

•OAKE Associates Ltd, Manchester, Manchester (UK)

•IFAID Institut de Formation et d’Appui aux Initiatives de Développement, Bordeaux (FR)

•ELLINIKH ETAIRIA DIOIKISEOS EPICHIRISEON (EEDE) (Hellenic Management Association - ΗΜΑ), Athens (EL)

•CARITAS Archidiecezji Gdańskiej, Gdansk (PL)

4

PARTNERS INVOLVED

Page 5: EVALUATION:  FINAL REPORT

5

EVALUATION OF EACH MEETING

Kick-off meeting: Palermo (IT) 28st – 29th October 2010

2nd meeting in Athens (EL): 10th – 11th February 2011

3rd meeting in Bordeaux (FR): 30th June – 1st July 2011

4th meeting in Lichfield (UK): 24th – 25th November 2011

5th meeting in Sopot (PL): 24th – 25th May 2012

Final meeting in Palermo (IT): 4th – 5th July 2012 (not

evaluated here, as Global Final Evaluation is introduced

during Final meeting)

Page 6: EVALUATION:  FINAL REPORT

6

MEETING IN PALERMO: 28th – 29th OCTOBER 2010

Page 7: EVALUATION:  FINAL REPORT

7

MEETING IN ATHENS: 10th – 11th February 2011

Page 8: EVALUATION:  FINAL REPORT

8

MEETING IN BORDEAUX: 30th JUNE– 1st JULY 2011

Page 9: EVALUATION:  FINAL REPORT

9

MEETING IN LICHFIELD: 24th – 25th NOVEMBER 2011

Page 10: EVALUATION:  FINAL REPORT

10

MEETING IN SOPOT: MAY 2012

Page 11: EVALUATION:  FINAL REPORT

11

GLOBAL EVALUATION OF MEETINGS

Kick-off meeting: Palermo (IT) 28st – 29th October 2010

2nd meeting in Athens (EL): 10th – 11th February 2011

3rd meeting in Bordeaux (FR): 30th June – 1st July 2011

4th meeting in Lichfield (UK): 24th – 25th November 2011

5th meeting in Sopot (PL): 24th – 25th May 2012

Final meeting in Palermo (IT): 4th – 5th July 2012 (not

evaluated here, as Global Final Evaluation is introduced

during Final meeting)

Page 12: EVALUATION:  FINAL REPORT

12

GLOBAL EVALUATION OF MEETINGS

Page 13: EVALUATION:  FINAL REPORT

THE MOST QUOTED GENERAL ASPECTS HAVE BEEN:Coherency of topics with the principles of Leonardo da Vinci’s Subprogramme and LLP;Feedback among partners;Transparence and clarity of proposals;Cooperation and work team;Clear and comprehensive communication;Sharing information;Cultural exchange.

THE LEAST QUOTED GENERAL ASPECTS HAVE BEEN:Agenda flexibility;Suitability of time spent for each topic.

13

COMMENTS - MEETINGS

Page 14: EVALUATION:  FINAL REPORT

ATTITUDE OF PARTNERS :Involvement of partners in the activities of the project;High motivation about activities/tasks developed according to Work Plan;In general, attitude of partners has been active towards the project and overall items scheduled in each meetings agenda.

OVERALL SATISFACTION DEGREE:In general, partners are very satisfied (83,03%) and satisfied (16,97%) with the implementation of activities.

HAVE THE EXPECTATIONS BEEN SATISFIED? Expectations satisfied for about 88,85% of partner organisations (in despite of some unforeseen absence in some meeting);Expectations are partly satisfied only for 11,15%.

14

COMMENTS - MEETINGS

Page 15: EVALUATION:  FINAL REPORT

15

Thank you for your attention