28
1 Evaluating a QTH Evaluating a QTH for Contesting and for Contesting and DXing DXing Steve London, N2IC Steve London, N2IC

Evaluating a QTH for Contesting and DXing

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Evaluating a QTH for Contesting and DXing. Steve London, N2IC. Factors to be considered. Site Selection Criteria Ionospheric propagation to maximize QSO’s and multipliers Relative rarity – country, state, prefix … Antenna-friendly government and neighbors Antenna-friendly environment - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Evaluating a QTH for Contesting and DXing

11

Evaluating a QTH for Evaluating a QTH for Contesting and DXingContesting and DXing

Steve London, N2ICSteve London, N2IC

Page 2: Evaluating a QTH for Contesting and DXing

22

Factors to be consideredFactors to be considered Site Selection CriteriaSite Selection Criteria

• Ionospheric propagation to maximize QSO’s and Ionospheric propagation to maximize QSO’s and multipliersmultipliers

• Relative rarity – country, state, prefix …Relative rarity – country, state, prefix …• Antenna-friendly government and neighborsAntenna-friendly government and neighbors• Antenna-friendly environmentAntenna-friendly environment• Cost of living and landCost of living and land• AccessibilityAccessibility• Availability and cost of resources for assembling stationAvailability and cost of resources for assembling station• Quiet receiving locationQuiet receiving location• Proximity to non-contesting amenities and employmentProximity to non-contesting amenities and employment• Do you really want to live there ?Do you really want to live there ?

Page 3: Evaluating a QTH for Contesting and DXing

33

Evaluating the location Evaluating the location

What are the propagation What are the propagation characteristics to the desired characteristics to the desired targets ?targets ?

What is the effect of local topography What is the effect of local topography ??

Is there an optimal, realizable Is there an optimal, realizable antenna system for the location ?antenna system for the location ?

Page 4: Evaluating a QTH for Contesting and DXing

44

A property to be A property to be consideredconsidered

Page 5: Evaluating a QTH for Contesting and DXing

55

Page 6: Evaluating a QTH for Contesting and DXing

66

Page 7: Evaluating a QTH for Contesting and DXing

77

How high can that How high can that mountain be before it mountain be before it affects my signal ? affects my signal ?

Page 8: Evaluating a QTH for Contesting and DXing

88

4.6 degree horizon

(tan-1 h/d)

How High is that Mountain ?

DeLorme TopoUSA

Page 9: Evaluating a QTH for Contesting and DXing

99

What about the curvature of the earth ?What about the curvature of the earth ?

H = D2/1.47727

H = Number of feet that object “drops”

D = Number of miles from object

Page 10: Evaluating a QTH for Contesting and DXing

1010

How strong is my How strong is my signal….with and without signal….with and without

the obstruction ?the obstruction ?

Page 11: Evaluating a QTH for Contesting and DXing

1111

Case StudyCase Study

Denver-to-JA/UA0/JTDenver-to-JA/UA0/JT 15 meters15 meters 0100Z0100Z March 30March 30 Sunspot Number = 70 (Solar Flux = Sunspot Number = 70 (Solar Flux =

120)120)

Page 12: Evaluating a QTH for Contesting and DXing

1212

Summary of StepsSummary of Steps

Model the terrain from your QTH in the Model the terrain from your QTH in the interesting directionsinteresting directions

Model your antennas over your terrainModel your antennas over your terrain Model the propagation to your targetModel the propagation to your target Compare the propagation to your target Compare the propagation to your target

with "real" terrain and "real“ antennas vs. with "real" terrain and "real“ antennas vs. "ideal" terrain and "ideal" antennas."ideal" terrain and "ideal" antennas.

Page 13: Evaluating a QTH for Contesting and DXing

1313

Model the TerrainModel the Terrain Paper USGS Topographic MapsPaper USGS Topographic Maps

• Draw a line from the tower base in the direction of Draw a line from the tower base in the direction of interestinterest

• Plot and read points along the linePlot and read points along the line• Painstaking !Painstaking !

Topographic Map Software (i.e. DeLorme Topographic Map Software (i.e. DeLorme TopoUSA)TopoUSA)• Easier, but still doesn’t automatically generate dataEasier, but still doesn’t automatically generate data

MicroDEM (Internet Freeware and included in MicroDEM (Internet Freeware and included in ARRL Antenna Book)ARRL Antenna Book)• Manipulates Digital Elevation Model (DEM) topographic Manipulates Digital Elevation Model (DEM) topographic

data available free on the internet.data available free on the internet.• Automatically generates azimuth terrain profile filesAutomatically generates azimuth terrain profile files

Page 14: Evaluating a QTH for Contesting and DXing

1414ARRL HFTA

Page 15: Evaluating a QTH for Contesting and DXing

1515ARRL HFTA

Model the Antenna over Flat Terrain

Page 16: Evaluating a QTH for Contesting and DXing

1616

Model the Antenna over the Actual Terrain

Page 17: Evaluating a QTH for Contesting and DXing

17

2-hop F2

3-hop F2

Transition

VOACAP

Model the Propagation

Page 18: Evaluating a QTH for Contesting and DXing

18

4.6 degree horizon, 50 foot high monobander over flat terrain

VOACAP

Put it all together !

Page 19: Evaluating a QTH for Contesting and DXing

19

1 degree horizon, 50 foot high monobander over flat terrain

VOACAP

Page 20: Evaluating a QTH for Contesting and DXing

2020

Compare !Compare !

Page 21: Evaluating a QTH for Contesting and DXing

2121

ConclusionsConclusions

Difficult to make sweeping statements Difficult to make sweeping statements based on 1 case studybased on 1 case study

This single case study would suggest:This single case study would suggest:  - The 4.6 % obstruction significantly   - The 4.6 % obstruction significantly

degrades performance to areas degrades performance to areas with with marginal openings.marginal openings.

Page 22: Evaluating a QTH for Contesting and DXing

2222

Useful ReferencesUseful References Propagation prediction software:Propagation prediction software:

• VOACAPVOACAP http://elbert.its.bldrdoc.gov/hf.html http://elbert.its.bldrdoc.gov/hf.html• VOACAP Quick Guide - OH6BG VOACAP Quick Guide - OH6BG http://www.uwasa.fi/~jpe/voacap/http://www.uwasa.fi/~jpe/voacap/• MultiNEC (http://www.qsl.net/ac6la)MultiNEC (http://www.qsl.net/ac6la)• ACE-HF (Reviewed Nov 2002 QST)ACE-HF (Reviewed Nov 2002 QST)• PropMan2000 (Sept 2001 QST)PropMan2000 (Sept 2001 QST)• WinCAP (Jan 2003 QST)WinCAP (Jan 2003 QST)

Topographic map software:Topographic map software:• DeLorme TopoUSADeLorme TopoUSA - http://www.delorme.com/topousa/default.asp - http://www.delorme.com/topousa/default.asp• MicroDEMMicroDEM – –

http://www.nadn.navy.mil/Users/oceano/pguth/website/microdem.htmhttp://www.nadn.navy.mil/Users/oceano/pguth/website/microdem.htm

Terrain analysis software:Terrain analysis software:• HFTA (HF Terrain Analysis)HFTA (HF Terrain Analysis) – ARRL Antenna Book, 20 – ARRL Antenna Book, 20thth edition, edition,

Page 23: Evaluating a QTH for Contesting and DXing

2323

N2IC/5 QTH …N2IC/5 QTH …

Page 24: Evaluating a QTH for Contesting and DXing

2424

Page 25: Evaluating a QTH for Contesting and DXing

2525

Page 26: Evaluating a QTH for Contesting and DXing

2626

Page 27: Evaluating a QTH for Contesting and DXing

2727

Page 28: Evaluating a QTH for Contesting and DXing

2828

What I Have Learned at the New QTHWhat I Have Learned at the New QTH

It’s easy to be moderately strongIt’s easy to be moderately strong• 30’ of height works well on the high bands30’ of height works well on the high bands

Not so easy to be REALLY strongNot so easy to be REALLY strong• Stacked yagis play predictably on flat terrainStacked yagis play predictably on flat terrain• No apparent stacking gain on a mountainNo apparent stacking gain on a mountain

Antenna and terrain modeling doesn’t tell Antenna and terrain modeling doesn’t tell the whole storythe whole story• HFTA has significant issues with complex HFTA has significant issues with complex

terrainterrain