23
中国电动汽车推广的能源和环境影响 Energy and Environmental Impacts of Vehicle Electrification in China Ye Wu School of Environment, Tsinghua University March 21, 2013, Macao, China

EV in China MIECF2013 WU

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    2

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

中国电动汽车推广的能源和环境影响Energy and Environmental Impacts of

Vehicle Electrification in China

Ye Wu School of Environment, Tsinghua University

March 21, 2013, Macao, China

Background

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

1985 1990 1995 2000 2005Year

GD

P ($

)

The boost of economy

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

1600

1800

2000

1985 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004

Priv

ate

& N

on-P

rivat

e(10

000

Uni

ts)

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

Tota

l(10

000

Uni

ts)

Private Non-Private Total

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

1985 1990 1995 2000 2005Year

Veh

icle

per

100

0 pe

ople

(Uni

t)

Total auto population

Autos per 1000 people

-5000

0

5000

10000

15000

20000

25000

30000

35000

1991 1993 1995 1997 1999 2001 2003 2005

消耗

进口

Total consumption (10,000 tons)

Imported petroleum (10,000 tons)

-5000

0

5000

10000

15000

20000

25000

30000

35000

1991 1993 1995 1997 1999 2001 2003 2005

消耗

进口

Total consumption (10,000 tons)

Imported petroleum (10,000 tons)

Petroleum consumption

The rapid increase in vehicle population in China has been severely taxing the energy and material resources, and also posing a challenge to the mitigation of CO2 and urban criteria air pollutants.

Scenario Unit High Mid Low

Saturation Vehicles/1000 persons 600 500 400

2030 Stock million 528 471 407

Total automobile population will continue to increase rapidly, and will reach 210-240 million units in 2020, and 410-530 million units in 2030!

No matter which growth scenario, China will become the leading country in automobile population within the next 15 years.

Projection of China’s Vehicle Stock through 2030

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

200

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70

GDP per capita(1000 RMB Yuan)

LDPV

ow

ners

hip(

per 1

000

peop

le)

Beijing

Tianjin

Hebei

Shanghai

Jiangsu

Zhejiang

Guangdong

The fast growth in automobiles in developed regions in China will slow down after 2020. By 2030, the three well-developed regions will be the leading regions to move into the vehicle saturation period.

Regional Variation in Vehicle Stock in China

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030

LDPV

 stock (m

illion)

Jing‐Jin‐Ji Region(low)

Jing‐Jin‐Ji Region(high)

Yangtze‐River‐Delta Region(low)

Yangtze‐River‐Delta Region(high)

Pearl‐River‐Delta Region(low)

Pearl‐River‐Delta Region(high)

The Challenges We Are Facing

Short of crude oil resources and energy safety issueDependence in imported oil: NOW IS 57%Fuel economy

Climate change and global warmingCO2

CH4 and N2OBC…

Urban air pollution and urban mobility and sustainabilityCO, HC, NOX

PM2.5

EC/OCPAHS/HCHO…

The Challenges We Are Facing

Without penetration of advanced propulsion/fuel systems, oil consumption will reach as high as 0.67-1.19 billion tons, and trigger a much higher dependence with imported oil !

The new National Ambient Air Quality Standard tightens NO2 and PM10, and add two new items: 8-hour O3 and PM2.5. All these three air pollutants have a strong link with vehicles.

The Challenges We Are Facing

HEV/PHEV/EV Demonstration in China

By 2010, 25 cities:

3950 EVs,

7145 HEVs

800 PHEVs

11895 in Total

3 charging stations available as of Dec 20121 only for visiting/demo

1 only for Asian games service (only fast charging)

1 for bus 801 route (located in College-city)

College-city charging/swapping station (serving 2 years by local traffic committee)

Battery swapping:7-8 minutes (10 modules), semi-automatic operation, 10 battery modules each and 80-90 minutes full charging (AC,21kW),vehicle/battery ratio 1:1.5 in ideal condition;

Fast charging: 3 DC charging plots (max 400 kW), 70-90 minutes full charging.

Racetrack demo stationSupported by Southern Grid and Israel

Battery swapping applied

AC slow charging plot: 6-7 hours for full charging

Current status of charging infrastructure in 25 demo cities: 1) Guangzhou

61 charging stations available as of Dec 2012 (network in 200+ stations by 2015)

57: only for bus and taxi fleet

4: for both bus/taxi and private vehicles

2,400 AC charging plots

Nearly 600 fast charging plots

253 EV buses, 460 EV taxi, 1,781 PHEV for public use, mainly located in downtown and urban areas

2-3 hours for fast charging of bus (570V/180A) and taxi (360V/100A)

Subsidy: national/local subsidy to vehicle company (e.g., BYD)

Operation: China Potevio leasing batteries to bus company as well as operating charging stations

Current status of charging infrastructure in 25 demo cities: 2) Shenzhen

Fuel Cycle

Well to Pump

Pump to W

heels

Fuel Cycle

Well to Pump

Pump to W

heels

Fuel Cycle

Well to Pump

Pump to W

heels

PetroleumGasoline

Diesel

CoalNG

NuclearBiomass

Hydro, Solar, etc.

Electricity

The Boundary of LCA Analysis for Electric Vehicles: Fuel Cycle

Electricity Generation Mix in China in 2009

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

National NorthChina

NortheastChina

East China CentralChina

NorthwestChina

SouthChina

Gen

erat

ion

mix

coal oil gas hydro nuclear wind others

14,000

7,000

1,400

全年用电量

(亿千万时)

14,000

7,000

1,400

全年用电量

(亿千万时)

Electricity Generation Mix Forecast by Region in 2030

2.2%

5.3% 4.5% 1.5%

86.5%

Yangtze‐River‐Delta Region

60.2%

3.0%5.0%

28.7%

3.1%

Pearl‐River‐Delta Region

82.5%

1.5%

8.5%3.5%4.0%

6.0%5.5%

11.5%

9.5%

67.5%

5.0%

26.5%

9.0%

3.5%

56.0% 41.0%

11.0%

12.0%

29.0%7.0%

7 . 0 %2 9 . 0 %

1 2 . 0 %

1 1 . 0 %

4 1 . 0 %

Coal NG Hydro Nuclear Others

a) 2010 b) 2030(conservative)

c) 2030(aggressive)

94.8%

4.0%0.4%0.8%

Jing‐Jin‐JiRegion

3.0%

0.4% 3.5% 2.1%

91.0% 76.0%

12.0%6.5%

5.0%

LDPV (on-road fuel economy)

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

7.0

7.1

7.2

7.3

7.4

7.5

7.6

7.7

Top10 Top20 Top30 Top40 Top50 Top60LD

PV m

arke

t sha

re(

%)

LDPV

fuel

eco

nom

y (L

/100

km)

LDPV sales ranking

Fuel economy and market share of China Top 60 LDPV in 2010

LDPV market share LDPV fuel economy

LDPV (lab-test fuel economy)

Fuel Economy of GV, HEV, PHEV and EV

HEV (fuel economy)PHEV and EV (fuel economy)

Well-to-Wheels Petroleum Use of HEV/PHEV/EV

HEV can achieve 30% reduction in petroleum use relative to ICEV; while PHEV50 can achieve 50% reduction, and EV almost eliminates the petroleum use.In this study, we use a FE rate of 140% for HEV, 280% for CD mode and 120% for CS mode for PHEV50 (AER= 50 km), and 375% for EV relative to ICEV. For ICEV, FE values are 8.5, 7.3 and 6.4 L/100 km for 2010, 2020, and 2030, respectively.

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

ICEV

HEV

PHEV

50 EV

ICEV

HEV

PHEV

50 EV

ICEV

HEV

PHEV

50 EV

ICEV

HEV

PHEV

50 EV

ICEV

HEV

PHEV

50 EV

2010 2015 2020 2025 2030

Petroleum use (kJ/km

)

WTT TTWa) Jing‐Jin‐Ji Region

Well-to-Wheels Fossil Energy Use of HEV/PHEV/EV

The WTW fossil energy use reduction benefit is less than that of petroleum use for PHEV/EV.

In those regions that already have a sizeable proportion of clean electric energy (e.g., Pearl-River-Delta region) will have considerable reduction benefit with promotion of EV compared to HEV.

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

4000

ICEV

HEV

PHEV

50 EV

ICEV

HEV

PHEV

50 EV

ICEV

HEV

PHEV

50 EV

ICEV

HEV

PHEV

50 EV

ICEV

HEV

PHEV

50 EV

2010 2015 2020 2025 2030

Fossil fuel use (kJ/km

)

WTT TTWa) Jing‐Jin‐Ji Region

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

4000

ICEV

HEV

PHEV

50 EV

ICEV

HEV

PHEV

50 EV

ICEV

HEV

PHEV

50 EV

ICEV

HEV

PHEV

50 EV

ICEV

HEV

PHEV

50 EV

2010 2015 2020 2025 2030

Fossil fuel use (kJ/km

)

WTT TTWc) Pearl‐River‐Delta Region

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

4000

ICEV

HEV

PHEV

50 EV

ICEV

HEV

PHEV

50 EV

ICEV

HEV

PHEV

50 EV

ICEV

HEV

PHEV

50 EV

ICEV

HEV

PHEV

50 EV

2010 2015 2020 2025 2030

Fossil fuel use (kJ/km

)

WTT TTWb) Yangtze‐River‐Delta Region

Well-to-Wheels CO2 Emissions of HEV/PHEV/EV

The WTW CO2 reduction benefit is much less for PHEV/EV for those regions (e.g., Jing-Jin-Ji region) with dominant coal-fired power plants. However, in those regions that already have a sizeable proportion of clean electric energy (e.g., Pearl-River-Delta region) will relieve the overall CO2burden substantially with promotion of PHEV and EV in the future.

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

ICEV

HEV

PHEV

50 EV

ICEV

HEV

PHEV

50 EV

ICEV

HEV

PHEV

50 EV

ICEV

HEV

PHEV

50 EV

ICEV

HEV

PHEV

50 EV

2010 2015 2020 2025 2030

CO2 em

ission

s (g/km)

WTT TTWc) Pearl‐River‐Delta Region

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

ICEV

HEV

PHEV

50 EV

ICEV

HEV

PHEV

50 EV

ICEV

HEV

PHEV

50 EV

ICEV

HEV

PHEV

50 EV

ICEV

HEV

PHEV

50 EV

2010 2015 2020 2025 2030

CO2 em

ission

s (g/km)

WTT TTWa) Jing‐Jin‐Ji Region

300

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

ICEV

HEV

PHEV

50 EV

ICEV

HEV

PHEV

50 EV

ICEV

HEV

PHEV

50 EV

ICEV

HEV

PHEV

50 EV

ICEV

HEV

PHEV

50 EV

2010 2015 2020 2025 2030

CO2 em

ission

s (g/km)

WTT TTWb) Yangtze‐River‐Delta Region

0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

ICEV

HEV

PHEV

50 EV

ICEV

HEV

PHEV

50 EV

ICEV

HEV

PHEV

50 EV

ICEV

HEV

PHEV

50 EV

2015 2020 2025 2030

VO

C e

mis

sion

s (g/

km)

TTW

WTT

a) Jing-Jin-Ji region

PHEV and EV can achieve significant reduction in VOC emissions compared to that of conventional gasoline car.

Well-to-Wheels VOC Emissions of HEV/PHEV/EV

0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

ICEV

(Dom

estic

ICEV

HEV

PHEV

50 EV

ICEV

(Dom

estic

ICEV

HEV

PHEV

50 EV

ICEV

(Dom

estic

ICEV

HEV

PHEV

50 EV

ICEV

(Dom

estic

ICEV

HEV

PHEV

50 EV2015 2020 2025 2030

NO

x em

issi

ons (

g/km

)

TTW

WTT

0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

ICEV

(Dom

estic

ICEV

HEV

PHEV

50 EV

ICEV

(Dom

estic

ICEV

HEV

PHEV

50 EV

ICEV

(Dom

estic

ICEV

HEV

PHEV

50 EV

ICEV

(Dom

estic

ICEV

HEV

PHEV

50 EV

2015 2020 2025 2030

NO

x em

issi

ons (

g/km

)

TTW

WTT

a) Jing-Jin-Ji region b) Pearl River Delta region

EV might have higher NOX emissions than its gasoline counterpart, especially in those regions will high coal power generation mix (e.g., in Northern China).However, with rapid installation of SCR in coal power plants in the next decade, NOX emission from EV will decrease faster than that of gasoline car. In Pearl-river delta region with more clean power, EV might achieve reduction in NOX in ~2020.

Well-to-Wheels NOX Emissions of HEV/PHEV/EV

The Boundary of LCA Analysis for Electric Vehicles: Vehicle Material Cycle

车辆材料周期车辆材料周期

Energy Use of Key Materials by Major Process: Lithium and Copper as an Example

Life-Cycle Fossil Energy Use of HEV/PHEV/EV: Well-to-Tank, Tank-to-Wheels Plus Vehicle Cycle

Thank you for your attention !

Questions ?

Ye Wu

010-62796947

[email protected]