Upload
philip-griffin
View
217
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
EuthanasiaEuthanasia
Part IIPart IIEthics
Dr. Jason M. Chang
Active vs. Passive Euthanasia
American Medical Association’s (AMA) policy
“The intentional termination of the life of one human being by another – mercy killing – is
contrary to that for which the medical profession stands and is contrary to the policy of the
American Medical Association […] The cessation of employment of extraordinary means to prolong the life of the body when there is
irrefutable evidence that biological death is immanent is the decision of the patient and/or immediate family.” (AMA, Opinions of Judicial
Council, 1973)
Active vs. Passive Euthanasia
“The State has reaffirmed the line between ‘killing’ and ‘letting die’ ”-U.S. Supreme Court, Vacco v. Quill
The Difference Thesis
There is a moral difference between killing and letting die: it is morally worse to kill than to let
die.
James Rachels, “Active and Passive Euthanasia”
Objective of article:
• To refute the Difference Thesis
• To argue that there is moral difference between active and passive euthanasia
James Rachels, “Active and Passive Euthanasia”
Point #1: Active vs. Passive Euthanasia
• Patient with throat cancer
• Rachels’s pointo Active euthanasia is sometimes
preferable to passive euthanasia
James Rachels, “Active and Passive Euthanasia”
Point #2: No moral difference between killing and letting die
• Smith and Jones example
• Rachels’s pointo Difference Thesis is false
Winston Nesbitt, “Is Killing No Worse Than Letting Die?”Objective of article:
• To refute the examples presented by Rachels that presume to show that the Difference Thesis is false
Winston Nesbitt, “Is Killing No Worse Than Letting Die?”Revisiting Rachel’s Example:
• Nesbitt concedes that we both Smith and Jones equally reprehensible
• Nesbitt asks, “What are the grounds for judging Smith and Jones as reprehensible”
Images from: www.typetoken.com/140/140_Class8.ppt
Grounds for judging Smith
He killed his nephew for
personal gain
Grounds for judging Jones
He was prepared to kill
his nephew, and would have
done so if necessary
Winston Nesbitt, “Is Killing No Worse Than Letting Die?”
• Nesbitt’s revised example – Jones slips and hits his head
• In revised example, Jones is just as reprehensible as Smith
• What makes each equally morally reprehensible is that each was fully prepared to kill for motives of personal gain – NOT because killing and letting die are morally equivalent.
Winston Nesbitt, “Is Killing No Worse Than Letting Die?”
• Nesbitt’s second revised example – Jones draws the line at killing
Bibliography
Lewis Vaughn. “Euthanasia and Assisted Suicide”, in Contemporary Moral Arguments, 2nd edition, Oxford, (2013), 264-268
“Is Euthanasia Wrong III”. Retrieved from: <www.typetoken.com/140/140_Class8.ppt>