48
Europeans and the Crisis IV 07 October 2011

Europeans and the Crisis IV 07 October 2011. Methodology

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Europeans and the Crisis IV 07 October 2011. Methodology

Europeans and the Crisis IV

07 October 2011

Page 2: Europeans and the Crisis IV 07 October 2011. Methodology

Methodology

Page 3: Europeans and the Crisis IV 07 October 2011. Methodology

Methodology

o Face-to-face interviews in the home of respondents

o Fieldwork: 3-18 September 2011

o Population: representative sample of people aged 15+

o Coverage: 27 European Union Member States

o Number of interviews: 26.856

Special Eurobarometer

3

Page 4: Europeans and the Crisis IV 07 October 2011. Methodology

Structure

Page 5: Europeans and the Crisis IV 07 October 2011. Methodology

Structure

A. Credit rating agencies

B. Convergence of budget policies

C. Pooling debt

D. Eurobonds

E. Europeans in the face of the crisis

• The current impact of the crisis

• The consequences of the crisis on working life

• Return to growth: when?

• The euro: has it acted as a “shock absorber”?

• Coordinated or individual action to deal with the crisis?

F. Solidarity between Member States

5

Page 6: Europeans and the Crisis IV 07 October 2011. Methodology

A. Credit rating agencies

Page 7: Europeans and the Crisis IV 07 October 2011. Methodology

7

A.1 CRA – One in two Europeans has heard of them

Total ‘Yes’: 50%

(1%)

Page 8: Europeans and the Crisis IV 07 October 2011. Methodology

*

4%

8

A.2 The influence of credit rating agencies: useful but controversial in the eyes of Europeans

Total “Agree”: 65% Total “Agree”: 64%

Total “Disagree” : 21%

*Basis: Questions asked to the 50% of people polled who have heard of CRA

Total “Disagree” : 18%

Page 9: Europeans and the Crisis IV 07 October 2011. Methodology

9

A.3 CRA– their role and the usefulness of the information provided by them: Europeans divided

* Basis: Questions asked to the 50% of people polled who have heard of credit rating agencies

Total 'Agree'

EU27 64%

NL 81%

SE 81%

FI 80%

CY 79%

DK 78%

… …

DE 58%

PT 55%

IE 54%

EL 54%

ES 54%

RO 48%

QA15.3 Information provided by credit rating agencies is useful to economic actors as support for

their financial decision-making *

Total 'Agree'

EU27 65%

LU 78%

CY 77%

BE 73%

DE 72%

IT 72%

CZ 53%

EE 51%

BG 50%

LT 49%

RO 48%

QA15.1Credit rating agencies have played a significant role in the development of the financial

crisis*

Page 10: Europeans and the Crisis IV 07 October 2011. Methodology

*

10

A.4 CRA– A majority of Europeans are in favour of the creation of an independent European credit rating agency

Total “Agree”: 65%

Total “Disagree” : 17%

* Basis: Question asked to the 50% of people polled who have heard of CRA

Page 11: Europeans and the Crisis IV 07 October 2011. Methodology

B. Convergence of budget policies

Page 12: Europeans and the Crisis IV 07 October 2011. Methodology

12

B.1 Europeans are in favour of budget convergence and escalating financial penalties

Total ‘In favour’: 67%

Total ‘Opposed’ : 18%

Total ‘In favour’: 68%

Total ‘Opposed’ : 19%

Page 13: Europeans and the Crisis IV 07 October 2011. Methodology

Total 'In favour' Total 'Opposed'Don't know

EU27 68% 19% 13%

EURO ZONE

72% 18% 10%

NON EURO

61% 21% 18%

QA10.2 Automatic application of escalating financial penalties for EU Member States which fail to comply with

jointly defined rules on debt and public deficit

Total 'In favour' Total 'Opposed'Don't know

EU27 67% 18% 15%

EURO ZONE

72% 15% 13%

NON EURO

58% 23% 19%

QA10.1 Including a preliminary consultation between European institutions and national political institutions in

the drafting process of national budgets

13

B.1 Budget convergence – eurozone/Non-eurozone

QA10 Specifically regarding the convergence between the budgetary policies of the EU Member States, tell me if you are in favour of oropposed to each of the following measures.

Page 14: Europeans and the Crisis IV 07 October 2011. Methodology

C. Pooling debt

Page 15: Europeans and the Crisis IV 07 October 2011. Methodology

15

C.1 A majority of Europeans support the idea of pooling part of the debt

66%

62%

61%

57%

50%

Page 16: Europeans and the Crisis IV 07 October 2011. Methodology

16

C.2 What consequences for the Member States having the least difficulties?

Page 17: Europeans and the Crisis IV 07 October 2011. Methodology

17

C.3 What consequences for the Member States having the most difficulties ?

Page 18: Europeans and the Crisis IV 07 October 2011. Methodology

D. Eurobonds

Page 19: Europeans and the Crisis IV 07 October 2011. Methodology

19

D.1 Two out of five Europeans have heard of Eurobonds

Total ‘Yes’: 42%

(1%)

Page 20: Europeans and the Crisis IV 07 October 2011. Methodology

20

D.2 Eurobonds– eurozone/non-eurozone

Total ‘Yes’: 46%

EUROZONE NON EUROZONE

Total ‘Yes’: 35%

(1%)

Page 21: Europeans and the Crisis IV 07 October 2011. Methodology

21

D.3 A majority of the Europeans in the eurozone who have heard of them are in favour of their creation

Total ‘In favour’: 38%

Total ‘Opposed’ : 33%

EUROZONE*Basis: Question asked to the 7510 respondents in the eurozone who have heard of eurobonds

*

Page 22: Europeans and the Crisis IV 07 October 2011. Methodology

E. Europeans in the face of the crisis

Page 23: Europeans and the Crisis IV 07 October 2011. Methodology

The current impact of the crisis

Page 24: Europeans and the Crisis IV 07 October 2011. Methodology

24

E.1 Europeans are increasingly concerned about their personal situation

Page 25: Europeans and the Crisis IV 07 October 2011. Methodology

Total 'Impact' Diff. EB76.1 -EB74.1

EU27 59% +7

PT 87% +17

DK 40% +16

IT 78% +13

NL 42% +13

MT 64% +12

UK 66% +12

IE 81% +11

SK 69% +11

EL 92% +9

FR 59% +9

CY 84% +9

LU 38% +9

PL 54% +9

25

E.2 Negative perceptions have increased

AT 34% +7

BG 83% +6

ES 67% +6

LT 73% +6

SE 23% +4

CZ 58% +3

EE 75% +3

HU 89% +3

BE 49% +2

DE 29% +2

SI 62% -4

FI 24% -4

RO 79% -6

LV 69% -9

QA1.4 To what extent do you consider that the current crisis is or is not having an impact on each of the following?

Your personal situation

Page 26: Europeans and the Crisis IV 07 October 2011. Methodology

The consequences of the crisis on working life

Page 27: Europeans and the Crisis IV 07 October 2011. Methodology

27

E.3 Levels more or less unchanged but still high

Page 28: Europeans and the Crisis IV 07 October 2011. Methodology

QA2 Here are some situations that could have arisen recently in your working life or in the working life of those around you. For each of them, please tell me if this has happened as a direct consequence of the crisis, if it has happened but was not a direct

consequence of the crisis, or if it has not happened at all. You have lost your job\ your partner (husband or wife, partner, etc.) has lost his\ her job

- Yes, as a direct consequence of the crisis -

One of your relatives has lost his\ her job

Diff. EB76.1 -EB74.1

EU27 23% =

CY 44% +13

EL 40% +11

BG 43% +8

PT 28% +8

IE 55% +5

… …

FR 12% -5

FI 6% -5

LT 42% -8

SE 5% -9

LV 45% -12

You have lost your job\ your partner (husband or wife,

partner, etc.) has lost his\ her job

Diff. EB76.1 -EB74.1

EU27 12% +1

EL 16% +6

CY 15% +6

PT 18% +6

IT 13% +5

MT 8% +5

… …

FI 5% -1

EE 20% -2

SE 4% -2

LV 28% -6

28

E.4 Working life consequences: The situation has deteriorated in the countries the most affected by the crisis

Page 29: Europeans and the Crisis IV 07 October 2011. Methodology

Return to growth: when?

Page 30: Europeans and the Crisis IV 07 October 2011. Methodology

30

E.5 The crisis is expected to last for many years: negative perceptions of the situation have worsened

+5

+3

-6

-3

EB75 Spring 2011

Page 31: Europeans and the Crisis IV 07 October 2011. Methodology

31

E.6 Gloomy outlook

Page 32: Europeans and the Crisis IV 07 October 2011. Methodology

We are already returning to growth

Diff. EB76.1 -EB75.2

EU27 8% -6

LV 9% +5

PL 9% +1

BG 2% +1

LT 8% =

… …

AT 16% -13

NL 6% -23

FI 5% -29

SE 16% -42

The crisis is going to last for many years

Diff. EB76.1 -EB75.2

EU27 41% +5

CY 46% +17

IT 41% +12

HU 54% +12

SI 52% +10

… …

IE 49% -1

MT 27% -2

PL 31% -4

LV 42% -11

32

E.7 The deterioration is particularly sharp and extends to northern EU countries

QA4 When it comes to a return to growth in (OUR COUNTRY), which one of the following opinions is closest to your own?

Page 33: Europeans and the Crisis IV 07 October 2011. Methodology

We are already returning to

growth

A return to growth will start in the coming months

A return to growth will start in the coming years

The crisis is going to last for many

yearsDon't know

EU27 8% 10% 36% 41% 5%

15-24 10% 14% 38% 32% 6%

25-39 9% 11% 38% 38% 4%

40-54 7% 10% 36% 44% 3%

55 + 7% 8% 33% 47% 5%

15- 7% 8% 29% 51% 5%

16-19 8% 10% 35% 43% 4%

20+ 9% 11% 41% 36% 3%

Still studying 11% 15% 40% 28% 6%

Self- employed 7% 12% 40% 38% 3%

Managers 11% 12% 42% 32% 3%

Other white collars 9% 12% 40% 37% 2%

Manual workers 8% 10% 35% 43% 4%

House persons 6% 8% 32% 48% 6%

Unemployed 4% 7% 31% 52% 6%

Retired 7% 8% 32% 47% 6%

Students 11% 15% 40% 28% 6%

Total 'Mitigated negative effects' 10% 15% 39% 34% 2%

Total 'Not mitigated negative effects' 7% 8% 35% 47% 3%

QA4 When it comes to a return to growth in (OUR COUNTRY), which one of the following opinions is closest to your own?

Age

Education (End of)

Respondent occupation scale

Euro during the crisis

33

E.8 The crisis is expected to last for many years: The most vulnerable categories at the heart of the storm

Page 34: Europeans and the Crisis IV 07 October 2011. Methodology

The euro: has it acted as a “shock absorber”?

Page 35: Europeans and the Crisis IV 07 October 2011. Methodology

E.9 Opinions of Europeans on whether or not the euro has mitigated the negative effects of the crisis are stable …

35

Page 36: Europeans and the Crisis IV 07 October 2011. Methodology

E.10 … even if views of Europeans are slightly less polarised

Total “Agree” : 34%

Total “Disagree” : 54%

36

Inner Pie: EB75 Spring 2011Outer Pie: EB76.1 Sept. 2011

Page 37: Europeans and the Crisis IV 07 October 2011. Methodology

QA3 Could you tell me to what extent you agree or disagree with the following statement: Overall the euro has mitigated the negative effects of the crisis.

Total 'Agree'Diff.

EB76.1 -EB75.2

EU27 34% =

UK 43% +17

ES 32% +5

EL 40% +4

CY 30% +4

BG 22% +1

FR 28% +1

RO 36% +1

PL 27% =

PT 33% =

DK 34% -1

IE 46% -1

LV 23% -1

LT 21% -1

E.12 Significant differences between Member States

37

HU 32% -3

SI 23% -3

EE 28% -4

CZ 21% -5

LU 40% -5

BE 38% -6

IT 47% -6

MT 36% -6

DE 28% -8

SK 47% -8

NL 33% -11

FI 39% -11

SE 20% -11

AT 41% -12

Page 38: Europeans and the Crisis IV 07 October 2011. Methodology

Coordinated or individual action to deal with the crisis?

Page 39: Europeans and the Crisis IV 07 October 2011. Methodology

E.13 Support for coordinated action to deal with the crisis is stable

39

EB75 Spring 2011

Page 40: Europeans and the Crisis IV 07 October 2011. Methodology

E.14 Europeans perceive closer coordination between Member States

40

- 3

+10

- 7

Page 41: Europeans and the Crisis IV 07 October 2011. Methodology

Tended to act in a coordinated way with the other EU

countries

Diff. EB76.1 -EB74.1

EU27 48% +10

DE 61% +20

BG 56% +19

PT 55% +18

FR 43% +14

BE 54% +13

LV 48% +13

RO 39% +12

SE 50% +12

UK 34% +12

SK 52% +11

LT 43% +9

LU 48% +9

IE 41% +8

E.15 Europeans perceive closer coordination between Member States

41

IT 53% +8

MT 61% +8

PL 47% +8

DK 32% +7

EE 54% +7

EL 55% +6

AT 50% +6

CY 56% +5

HU 50% +3

SI 47% +3

FI 70% +2

ES 46% +1

NL 35% -1

CZ 44% -8

QA6 Would you say that up until now, to face the crisis, the various EU Member States have…?

Page 42: Europeans and the Crisis IV 07 October 2011. Methodology

F. Solidarity between Member States

Page 43: Europeans and the Crisis IV 07 October 2011. Methodology

F.1 Financial solidarity vis-à-vis MS in difficulty – Polarisation of European opinion

43

- 1

+ 4

- 6

+ 1

+2

Polarisation of opinion

Page 44: Europeans and the Crisis IV 07 October 2011. Methodology

QA7 To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statement: In times of crisis, it is desirable for (OUR COUNTRY) to give financial help to another EU Member State facing severe

economic and financial difficulties.

Total 'Agree'Diff. EB76.1 -

EB74.1

EU27 50% +1

LU 72% +13

DK 71% +2

SE 67% =

NL 65% +9

BE 60% - 1

PL 57% +6

DE 54% +8

IT 53% =

IE 53% - 2

PT 53% - 3

EL 52% +4

ES 52% +3

FR 52% +1

F.2 Financial solidarity – Europeans who agreeSignificant differences between Member States

44

FI 52% - 6

MT 51% +4

CY 51% - 19

AT 50% - 5

UK 45% - 1

EE 44% - 12

LT 40% - 2

CZ 37% +2

HU 36% +1

LV 36% - 2

RO 34% +2

SK 32% - 3

BG 27% +3

SI 25% - 4

Page 45: Europeans and the Crisis IV 07 October 2011. Methodology

Total 'Disagree'

Diff. EB76.1 -EB74.1

EU27 44% +5

SI 74% +6

SK 65% +6

LV 62% +5

BG 62% +11

HU 61% +3

CZ 60% =

LT 56% +10

RO 56% +11

EE 53% +15

UK 50% +8

FI 47% +9

AT 46% +8

CY 46% +23

QA7 To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statement: In times of crisis, it is desirable for (OUR COUNTRY) to give financial help to another EU Member State facing severe

economic and financial difficulties.

F.3 Financial solidarity – Europeans who disagreeSignificant differences between Member States

45

EL 46% =

FR 45% +3

DE 44% -1

MT 42% +2

ES 40% +4

BE 39% +2

PT 39% +10

IT 38% +9

IE 37% +8

NL 34% -6

PL 33% +1

SE 32% +5

DK 28% =

LU 25% -7

Page 46: Europeans and the Crisis IV 07 October 2011. Methodology

*

F.4 Reasons for providing financial help – European solidarity prevails and has gained significant ground

46

+ 4

- 3

*Basis: Question asked to the 50% of respondents who ‘agree’ with financial solidarity

Page 47: Europeans and the Crisis IV 07 October 2011. Methodology

F.5 The scores for the reasons for not providing financial help are stable

47* Basis: Question asked to the 44% of respondents who ‘disagree’ with financial solidarity

*

Page 48: Europeans and the Crisis IV 07 October 2011. Methodology

Thank you for your

attention