View
219
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
T H E NEWS IN F 0 c u s
fits of the trend rather than fight
it,” said Alan Schriesheim, direc-
tor of Argonne National Labora-
tory and chairman of the commit-
tee. During the 198Os, the share of
foreign ownership of U.S. manu-
facturing assets nearly tripled,
from 7.2 percent to 19.2 percent.
The committee concluded that
the growth of foreign investment
in U.S. R&D and the increase in
multinational alliances are poSi-
tive trends. To maximize the bene-
fits while minimizing the risks,
the committee also recommended
that:
l The federal government
should continue efforts to break
down barriers to U.S. investment
in foreign markets through exist-
ing trade laws. Trade barriers,
said the committee, “impose real
costs on U.S. citizens and raise
questions about the fairness and
value of foreign involvement
here.”
l Federal agencies should get
more latitude to benefit from the
R&D capabilities of U.S.-based,
foreign-owned firms. The commit-
tee notes that “foreign participa-
tion in publicly funded R&D is
regulated by confusing and at
times contradictory intergovem-
mental agreements and by U.S.
agency directives and guidelines.”
Euyope Reaches Timid Pact On Cross-Boydeu Access, Trade
A fter nearly a decade of wran-
gling, the battle over Euro-
pean Union cross border electric-
ity trade is settled, at least for
now. On June 20, EU ministers
reached a common position on a
draft directive that would open
EU countries’ electricity markets
to limited extra-national competi-
tion, with the prospect of a $56 bil-
lion market for power by the year
2003. A small market, open only
to the very largest customers-
100 GWh of annual usage or
more-would open sooner. Cus-
tomers using at least 20 GWh per
year would gain access in 2000,
and customers using 9 GWh per
year could be served by extra-na-
tional suppliers in 2003. The ar-
rangement could open 25 percent
of the market to outside supplier
access, with 32 percent of the mar-
ket reachable in six years.
But the extent of actual trading
will be constrained by limiting
provisions that could gut or
greatly restrict its purpose. Elec- tric&! de France, a steadfast foe of
open competition, won provi-
sions that appear to impose do-
mestic public service obligations
on foreign suppliers and call for
recovery of stranded costs. “There
cannot be a directive for us which
does not respect these two princi-
ples,” said France’s Industry Min-
ister Franck Borotra. In addition,
Ireland and Belgium won delays.
Though the main combatants
on the question were France and
Germany, nearly every EU mem-
ber had strong views on the mat-
ter, with countries such as the
U.K., Sweden, Norway and the
Netherlands preferring much
stronger liberalization. British En-
ergy Minister Tim Eggar, despite
the EU ban on his country’s beef,
decided against opposing the ac-
tion, saying “It’s better than no
deal.” And Germany’s RWE Ener-
gie AG, the country’s largest util-
ity with some 26 GW of installed
capacity, reacted negatively to the
compromise.
Despite the champagne corks
popping, the accord is not yet a
done deal. The arrangement must
still go before the European Parlia-
ment for its second opinion, then
come back to the Energy Council
for final approval, probably next
January.
Restructuring Watch
Southwestern Public Seyvice Backs Retail Wheeling in Texas
I n a June letter to Texas Gov.
George W. Bush, Southwestern Public Service Co. said allowing
retail customers to choose their
own power suppliers should be
“seriously considered” by the
next session of the legislature. In
August/September 2996 3