2
BS 536 STUDIES ON TALL BUILDINGS: DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS Fall 2010-2011 Case Study: Eureka Tower by Sinan Bilgen Submitted to: Assoc.Prof.Dr. Mehmet Halis Günel Arch. H.Emre IlgÕn (MSc.) MIDDLE EAST TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY DEPARTMENT OF ARCHITECTURE / BUILDING SCIENCE PROGRAM METU e S Sin Submitted to: Assoc.P ch H BS536 S: DESIGN CONSIDERATIO 010-2 ureka Tow en PROGRAM *http://buildingdb.ctbuh.org/?do=building&building_id=544 (Retrieved in December 2010) Photography (front page): http://www.eurekatower.com.au/logo.jpg&imgrefurl (Retrieved in January 2011) *Photograpghy: http://www.architectureweek.com/2003/0305/tools_1Ͳ1.html (Retrieved in December 2010) *Owen Martin, Advances In The Structural Design Of HighͲRise Residential Buildings in Australia (2005) LOCATION: MELBOURNE, AUSTRALIA USE: RESIDENTIAL STATUS: IN USE START OF CONSTRUCTION: 2001 COMPLETION: 2006 STRUCTURAL HEIGHT: 297 METERS FLOORS: 91 FLOORS + 1 FLOOR BELOW GROUND ARCHITECT: FENDER KATSALIDIS ARCHITECTS STRUCTURAL ENGINEER: CONNEL MOTT MAC DONALD CONTRACTOR: GROCON EUREKA TOWER STRUCTURAL HEIGHT: 297 METERS OBSERVATORY HEIGHT: 282 METERS ASPECT RATIO: 7/1 TOP DRIFT: 600 mm ( 1/500) MATERIAL: CONCRETE CONCRETE STRENGTH: HIGH STRENGTH CONCRETE UP TO 100 MPA DAMPER: MASS LIQUID DAMPER Case Study: Eureka Tower by Sinan Bilgen Submitted to: Günel, lgÕn – Fall 2010 MOST NUMBER OF OUTRIGGER FLOORS IN THE WORLD 79 OUTRIGGER FLOORS /buil raph MOT 297 M 28 MET 7 600 ( 1/5 ONC ETE TRENGT H DAMPER: MOST NUMBER F OUTRIGG OR BELOW RO S ARCHITECT DON NAME * http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eureka_Tower (Retrieved in December 2010) * http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eureka_Rebellion (Retrieved in December 2010) Eureka Tower is named after the Eureka Stockade, a rebellion of gold miners in 1854. This has been incorporated into the design, with the building's gold crown representing the gold rush and a red stripe representing the blood spilt during the revolt. The blue glass cladding that covers most of the building represents the blue background of the stockade's flag and the white lines also represent the eureka stockade flag. The prospectus of the building suggests the white horizontal stripes represent the marking units on a surveyor's measuring staff spec h tal units on veyo t of nd of he resent the STRUCTURAL SYSTEM : GUNEL & ILGIN: OUTRIGGERED FRAME SYSTEM TARANATH: NA, BUT SIMILAR TO OUTRIGGER AND BELT TRUSS SYSTEM IN STEEL SMITH & COULL: NA, BUT SIMILAR TO OUTRIGGER BRACE STRUCTURES DEAN, MARTIN, EMERY, CHANCELLOR: ‘’ THE STRUCTURAL STABILITY IS PROVIDED BY A COMPOSITE SYSTEM COMPRISING THE FOLLOWING COMPONENTS: • COUPLED LIFT CORES • EXTERNAL TUBE BEAM COLUMN AND FRAME INCORPORATING TWO MEGA COLUMNS • AN EASTͲWEST AND NORTHͲSOUTH OUTRIGGER SHEAR WALL SYSTEM LINKING THE CENTRAL CORE TO THE PERIMETER FRAME.’’ STRUCTURAL MATERIAL : HIGH STRENGTH CONCRETE STEEL: FAST ERECTION BUT MORE CRANE DEPENDENT REDUCING MASS MELBOURNE: LOW SEISMICITY, FREQUENT WINDS CONCRETE: RESISTANT TO THE WIND LOADS MUCH MORE EFFECTIVE TO MATCH THE SPEED VS. TO STEEL IN AUSTRALIA * Dean,Martin,Emery and Cahncellor (2001) AC EA EST SYSTEM NG MATERI HIG TRE T ION REDU MAS MELBOURNE LOW SEIS CONCRETE N STEEL TUR ROVIDED BY A COMP THE FOLLOWING OMPONE RES AM COLUMN AND FR S ORTH Ͳ SO NT SITE http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eureka_Tower (Retrieved in January 2011) http://www.keller.co.uk/keller/services/studies/row/3420444 (Retrieved in Nowember 2010) ͲPROXIMITY TO THE YARRA RIVER. ͲWATER TABLE ONLY 2m BELOW GROUND. Ͳ MAKING BASEMENTS UNECONOMICAL. Ͳ 35 m DEEP PILED FOUNDATION SYSTEM ON THE 30 m DEEP SILT AND GRAVEL SITE. RA VER NL 2m B RO NG SEMENTS NE 5 m EP LED ON THE 30 m D LEVELS 101 Of The World’s Tallest Buildings, Eureka Tower (2006) Image: AEC Bytes, a case study of Advanced BIM Implementation (2004) Ͳ Levels 0 to10 Podium Ͳ Levels 11 to 24 River Rise Ͳ Levels 25 to 52 Premier Rise Ͳ Levels 53 to 80 Sky Rise Ͳ Levels 81 to 91 Summit Ͳ 10 Storey car park rises to 31 m and floor plan measures 60m x 80 m approx. Ͳ The western wing terminates at level 56. Ͳ The eastern wing terminates at level 65. Ͳ Mechanical Levels at 25,53,81,90,91,92 River R 25 to 52 em ise Ͳ Levels 3 to 8 ky Ͳ Lev 81 9 0 St PLAN ORGANIZATIONS 101 Of The World’s Tallest Buildings, Eureka Tower (2006) Dean,Martin,Emery and Cahncellor (2001) 1ͲRiver Rise; Levels 11Ͳ24 2ͲPremier Rise; Levels 25Ͳ52 3ͲSky Rise;Levels 56Ͳ64 4ͲSky Rise;Levels 65Ͳ80 h 11 4 Ris Levels 25 ky Rise;Levels 56 Ͳ 6 4 Ͳ Sky Rise;Lev RIVER RISE LEVELS 11 TO 24 Ͳ NFA/GFA = 0.83 Ͳ 80 MPa Concrete in Core Walls. Ͳ 100 Mpa Concrete in Columns. Drawn by Sinan B7LGEN with reference to Owen Martin Mix (2003) /GFA = 0.83 80 MPa Co ete in ore Walls 100 M RIVER RISE LEVELS 11 TO 24 Drawn by Sinan B7LGEN with reference to Owen Martin PERIMETER wn 3 RIVER RISE LEVELS 11 TO 24 Drawn by Sinan B7LGEN with reference to Owen Martin LEVELS 24 TO 25 Drawn by Sinan B7LGEN with reference to Dean,Martin,Emery and Cahncellor Drawn by Sina B 7 LG h reference PREMIER RISE LEVELS 25 TO 52 Ͳ NFA/GFA = 0.87 Ͳ 21 cm Post Tensioned Concrete Slab Drawn by Sinan B7LGEN with reference to Dean,Martin,Emery and Cahncellor Freyssinet Eureka Tower 87 m Po Tensioned Conc PREMIER RISE LEVELS 25 TO 52 Drawn by Sinan B7LGEN with reference to Dean,Martin,Emery and Cahncellor nb LEVELS 55 TO 56 Drawn by Sinan B7LGEN with reference to The Eureka Tower: A Case Study of Advanced BIM Implementation (2004) rawn by Sina 7 L h reference SKY RISE LEVELS 56 TO 65 Ͳ NFA/GFA = 0.87 Ͳ First Drop off at level 56. Ͳ 21 cm Post Tensioned Concrete Slab Drawn by Sinan B7LGEN with reference to The Eureka Tower: A Case Study of Advanced BIM Implementation (2004) Freyssinet Eureka Tower Dro off level 6. 1 cm Post Tensioned ncr lab SKY RISE LEVELS 56 TO 65 Drawn by Sinan B7LGEN with reference to The Eureka Tower: A Case Study of Advanced BIM Implementation (2004) nb

Eureka Tower - Sinan Bilgen

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    12

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

BS 536STUDIES ON TALL BUILDINGS: DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS

Fall 2010-2011

Case Study: Eureka Towerby

Sinan Bilgen

Submitted to: Assoc.Prof.Dr. Mehmet Halis GünelArch. H.Emre Ilg n (MSc.)

MIDDLE EAST TECHNICAL UNIVERSITYDEPARTMENT OF ARCHITECTURE / BUILDING SCIENCE PROGRAM

METU e S

Sin

Submitted to: Assoc.Pch H

BS536S: DESIGN CONSIDERATIO

010-2

ureka Tow

en

PROGRAM

*http://buildingdb.ctbuh.org/?do=building&building_id=544 (Retrieved in December 2010)•Photography (front page): http://www.eurekatower.com.au/logo.jpg&imgrefurl (Retrieved in January 2011)*Photograpghy: http://www.architectureweek.com/2003/0305/tools_1 1.html (Retrieved in December 2010)*Owen Martin, Advances In The Structural Design Of High Rise Residential Buildings in Australia (2005)

LOCATION: MELBOURNE, AUSTRALIAUSE: RESIDENTIALSTATUS: IN USESTART OF CONSTRUCTION: 2001COMPLETION: 2006STRUCTURAL HEIGHT: 297 METERSFLOORS: 91 FLOORS + 1 FLOOR BELOW GROUNDARCHITECT: FENDER KATSALIDIS ARCHITECTSSTRUCTURAL ENGINEER: CONNEL MOTT MAC DONALDCONTRACTOR: GROCON

EUREKA TOWER

STRUCTURAL HEIGHT: 297 METERSOBSERVATORY HEIGHT: 282 METERSASPECT RATIO: 7/1TOP DRIFT: 600 mm ( 1/500)MATERIAL: CONCRETECONCRETE STRENGTH: HIGH STRENGTH CONCRETE UP TO 100 MPADAMPER: MASS LIQUID DAMPER

Case Study: Eureka Tower by Sinan BilgenSubmitted to: Günel, lg n – Fall 2010

MOST NUMBER OF OUTRIGGER FLOORS IN THE WORLD79 OUTRIGGER FLOORS

/builraph

MOT

297 M28 MET7600 ( 1/5ONC

ETE TRENGT HDAMPER:

MOST NUMBER FOUTRIGG

OR BELOW ROS ARCHITECT

DON

NAME

* http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eureka_Tower (Retrieved in December 2010)* http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eureka_Rebellion (Retrieved in December 2010)

Eureka Tower is named after the Eureka Stockade,a rebellion of gold miners in 1854. This has beenincorporated into the design, with the building'sgold crown representing the gold rush and a redstripe representing the blood spilt during therevolt. The blue glass cladding that covers most ofthe building represents the blue background of thestockade's flag and the white lines also representthe eureka stockade flag. The prospectus of thebuilding suggests the white horizontal stripesrepresent the marking units on a surveyor'smeasuring staff

spech tal s

units on veyo

t ofnd of theresentthe

STRUCTURAL SYSTEM :

GUNEL & ILGIN: OUTRIGGERED FRAME SYSTEM

TARANATH: NA, BUT SIMILAR TO OUTRIGGER AND BELT TRUSS SYSTEM IN STEEL

SMITH & COULL: NA, BUT SIMILAR TO OUTRIGGER BRACE STRUCTURES

DEAN, MARTIN,EMERY, CHANCELLOR: ‘’ THE STRUCTURAL STABILITY IS PROVIDED BY A COMPOSITE

SYSTEM COMPRISING THE FOLLOWING COMPONENTS:• COUPLED LIFT CORES• EXTERNAL TUBE BEAM COLUMN AND FRAME INCORPORATING

TWO MEGA COLUMNS• AN EAST WEST AND NORTH SOUTH OUTRIGGER SHEAR WALL

SYSTEM LINKING THE CENTRAL CORE TO THE PERIMETER FRAME.’’

STRUCTURAL MATERIAL : HIGH STRENGTH CONCRETE

STEEL: FAST ERECTION BUT MORE CRANE DEPENDENTREDUCING MASS

MELBOURNE: LOW SEISMICITY, FREQUENT WINDS

CONCRETE: RESISTANT TO THE WIND LOADSMUCH MORE EFFECTIVE TO MATCH THE SPEED VS. TO STEEL INAUSTRALIA

* Dean,Martin,Emery and Cahncellor (2001)

A CEA EST

SYSTEM NG

MATERI HIG TRE

T IONREDU MAS

MELBOURNE LOW SEIS

CONCRETE

N STEEL

TURES

ROVIDED BY A COMPTHE FOLLOWING OMPONE

RESAM COLUMN AND FR

SORTH SO

NT

SITE

•http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eureka_Tower (Retrieved in January 2011)•http://www.keller.co.uk/keller/services/studies/row/3420444 (Retrieved in Nowember 2010)

PROXIMITY TO THE YARRA RIVER.

WATER TABLE ONLY 2m BELOW GROUND.

MAKING BASEMENTS UNECONOMICAL.

35 m DEEP PILED FOUNDATION SYSTEMON THE 30 m DEEP SILT AND GRAVEL SITE.

RA VER

NL 2m B RO

NG SEMENTS NE

5 m EP LEDON THE 30 m D

LEVELS

•101 Of The World’s Tallest Buildings, Eureka Tower (2006)•Image: AEC Bytes, a case study of Advanced BIM Implementation (2004)

Levels 0 to10 Podium

Levels 11 to 24 River Rise

Levels 25 to 52 Premier Rise

Levels 53 to 80 Sky Rise

Levels 81 to 91 Summit

10 Storey car park rises to 31 m andfloor plan measures 60m x 80 m approx.

The western wing terminates at level 56.

The eastern wing terminates at level 65.

Mechanical Levels at 25,53,81,90,91,92

River R

25 to 52 em ise

Levels 3 to 8 ky

Lev 81 9

0 St

PLAN ORGANIZATIONS

•101 Of The World’s Tallest Buildings, Eureka Tower (2006)•Dean,Martin,Emery and Cahncellor (2001)

1 River Rise; Levels 11 24

2 Premier Rise; Levels 25 52

3 Sky Rise;Levels 56 64

4 Sky Rise;Levels 65 80

h

11 4

Ris Levels 25

ky Rise;Levels 56 6

4 Sky Rise;Lev

RIVER RISE LEVELS 11 TO 24

NFA/GFA = 0.83

80 MPa Concretein Core Walls.

100 Mpa Concretein Columns.

• Drawn bySinan B LGENwith reference toOwen Martin

• Mix (2003)

NFA/GFA = 0.83

80 MPa Co etein ore Walls

100 M

RIVER RISE LEVELS 11 TO 24

•Drawn by Sinan B LGENwith reference to Owen Martin

PERIMETER

wn

3RIVER RISE LEVELS 11 TO 24

•Drawn by Sinan B LGEN with reference to Owen Martin

LEVELS 24 TO 25

•Drawn by Sinan B LGENwith reference to Dean,Martin,Emery and CahncellorDrawn by Sina B LG

h reference

PREMIER RISE LEVELS 25 TO 52

NFA/GFA = 0.87

21 cm Post TensionedConcrete Slab

• Drawn by Sinan B LGENwith reference to Dean,Martin,Emeryand Cahncellor

• Freyssinet Eureka Tower

87

m Po TensionedConc

PREMIER RISE LEVELS 25 TO 52

•Drawn by Sinan B LGENwith reference to Dean,Martin,Emery and Cahncellor

n b

LEVELS 55 TO 56

•Drawn by Sinan B LGENwith reference to The Eureka Tower: A Case Study of Advanced BIM Implementation (2004)

rawn by Sina Lh reference

SKY RISE LEVELS 56 TO 65

NFA/GFA = 0.87

First Drop off at level 56.

21 cm Post TensionedConcrete Slab

• Drawn by Sinan B LGENwith reference to The Eureka Tower:A Case Study of Advanced BIMImplementation (2004)

• Freyssinet Eureka Tower

Dro off level 6.

1 cm Post Tensionedncr lab

SKY RISE LEVELS 56 TO 65

•Drawn by Sinan B LGENwith reference to The Eureka Tower: A Case Study of Advanced BIM Implementation (2004)

n b

SKY RISE LEVELS 65 TO 66

•Drawn by Sinan B LGENwith reference to The Eureka Tower: A Case Study of Advanced BIM Implementation (2004)

awn y Sinarefe

SKY RISE LEVELS 66 TO 80

NFA/GFA = 0.83

Second Drop off at level 65.

40 MPa Concretein Core Walls.

60 MPa Concrete inColumns.

• Drawn by Sinan B LGENwith reference to The Eureka Tower:A Case Study of Advanced BIMImplementation (2004)

• Mix (2003)

83

ond op ff at level 65.

0 MPa ConcreteCor lls.

60 MPa CoColu

SKY RISE LEVELS 66 TO 80

•Drawn by Sinan B LGENwith reference to The Eureka Tower: A Case Study of Advanced BIM Implementation (2004)

n b

GENERAL PERSPECTIVE

•Drawn by Sinan B LGEN

LIQUID DAMPER

* Owen Martin, Advances In Structural Design Of High Rise Residential Buildings In Australia (2005)

A LIQUID MASS DAMPERHAS BEEN ADOPTED ON 90AND 91st FLOORS AS AROOFTOP WATERSTORAGETANK.

300.000 LITRES OF WATER ISALSO USED FOR EMERGENCYFIRE SPRINKLERS ANDDOMESTIC CONSUMPTION.

D MASS AMPAS BEE ADOPTED ON 90ND 91st F ASOOFTOP WATERSTO

TA

3

SITE PHOTOS 2004

December 2004

March 2004 April 2004 May 2004 August 2004

September 2004 October 2004 November 2004

*Hesham Mohamed Hassan El Shahawy

200

ptem

Ma

SKYDECK

*Photography: www.eurekaskydeck.com.au/pdf/visitorguides/English.pdf (Retrieved in Nowember 2010)

SKYDECK

*Vertical City Tv Programme Season 1 Episode 3 (Retrieved in Nowember 2010)

SKYDECK

*Vertical City Tv Programme Season 1 Episode 3 (Retrieved in Nowember 2010)

SKYDECK

*Vertical City Tv Programme Season 1 Episode 3 (Retrieved in Nowember 2010)

SKYDECK

*Vertical City Tv Programme Season 1 Episode 3 (Retrieved in Nowember 2010)

REFERENCESOwen Martin, Advances In The Structural Design Of High Rise Residential Buildings in Australia (2005)

http://www.eurekatower.com.au/logo.jpg&imgrefurl (Retrieved in January 2011)

www.fkaustralia.com (Retrieved in December 2010)

http://buildingdb.ctbuh.org/?do=building&building_id=544 (Retrieved in December 2010)

http://www.architectureweek.com/2003/0305/tools_1 1.html (Retrieved in December 2010)

Dean,Martin,Emery and Cahncellor . Tall Buildings and Urban Habitat. Cities In Thir d Millenium. 6 th WorldCongress of CTBUH (2001) Pages:395 399.

Australian Council On Tall Buildings and Urban Habitat, Australia by 2010 (2008)

http://buildingdb.ctbuh.org/ (Retrieved in December 2010)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eureka_Tower (Retrieved in December 2010)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eureka_Rebellion (Retrieved in December 2010)

101 Of The World’s Tallest Buildings, Eureka Tower (2006)

AEC Bytes, a case study of Advanced BIM Implementation (2004).

www.eurekaskydeck.com.au/pdf/visitorguides/English.pdf (Retrieved in Nowember 2010)

Mix (2003)

Vertical City Tv Programme Season 1 Episode 3 (Retrieved in Nowember 2010)

Freyssinet Eureka Tower

cem

reka_Tow rieve

/wiki/Eureka_Rebell trie

d’s Tallest Buildings a Tower

s, case study of Advanc d B

urekaskydeck.com.au/pd

Mix (2003)

Vertical City Pro

eyssinet

er 2010)

eved December

an Habit Cities In Thir d Millenium

Australia by 201 (2008)

mb