Upload
moke
View
30
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Beyond Busan: From Aid to Development Effectiveness and South Korea’s Challenges as an Emerging Donor. Eun Mee Kim* & Jae Eun Lee** * Dean & Professor, Graduate School of International Studies Director, Institute for Development and Human Security Ewha Womans University - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Eun Mee Kim* & Jae Eun Lee*** Dean & Professor, Graduate School of International Studies
Director, Institute for Development and Human SecurityEwha Womans University
** Ph. D. Candidate, Graduate School of International StudiesEwha Womans University
DSA ConferenceNovember 3, 2012
Table of Contents
I. Introduction II. From Aid to Development EffectivenessIII. New Global PartnershipIV. South Korea’s Challenges as an Emerging Donor
2
I. IntroductionGlobal Partnership for Effective Development
New global development cooperation framework launched Growing importance of emerging donors’ influence in
development activities South Korea as an emerging donor
Joined OECD DAC as 24th member Hosted G20 Summit Meeting (2010) & Busan HLF-4 (2011)
Led discussion and efforts towards a new global framework Encouraged participation of emerging donors (including BRICs)
Steering Committee of Global Partnership Representative of providers of development cooperation (with
EU and US)
3
II. From Aid to Development Effectiveness1. Evolution of Aid Effectiveness Framework Millennium Development Goals by 2015 Monterrey Consensus (2002)
Commitment to increase development finance HLF-1 (First High-Level Forum on Aid Effectiveness), Rome (2003)
Need for more effective management of aid for maximization of development impact
Led by OECD/DAC WP-EFF Aid Harmonization
4
II. From Aid to Development Effectiveness1. Evolution of Aid Effectiveness Framework HLF-2, Paris (2005)
Paris Declaration endorsed 5 Principles: Ownership, Alignment, Harmonization, Results-
based Management, Mutual Accountability Practical and action-oriented roadmap by 2010: Goals with
specific indicators & target years, monitoring process HLF-3, Accra (2008)
Accelerate and deepen implementation of the Paris Declaration Three areas for improvement: Ownership, Inclusive Partnership,
Delivering Results
5
II. From Aid to Development Effectiveness1. Evolution of Aid Effectiveness Framework Analysis of the Paris Declaration Monitoring Survey (OECD, 2011):
Real, but slow and uneven results Real changes in aid management and delivery practicesParis Principle as global norms for development cooperation Targets far from being universally achieved
An Increasingly Complex Development Environment New Global Development Challenges including food insecurity,
climate change and armed conflict Enlarging role for different actors and stakeholdersAid as a catalyst of development - complementary to other
development resources
6
II. From Aid to Development Effectiveness2. HLF-4, Busan (2011) The most inclusive agreement on global development
cooperation 2,500 participants: (1) 160 donor and partner countries including
South-South partners; and (2) 70 international organizations, NGOs, congresses, and business corporations
Negotiating status given to diverse development stakeholders on an equal footing: NGOs, business corporations
Reaffirmed commitment for MDGs and sustainable development
7
II. From Aid to Development Effectiveness2. HLF-4, Busan (2011) “Busan Partnership for Effective Development Cooperation”
(Outcome Document) Shared Principles:
Ownership of development priorities by developing countries Focus on results Inclusive development partnerships Transparency and accountability
Shared Principles of ownership, results and accountability are directly derived from the Paris Principle
New Commitments: Inclusive partnerships; Transparency
8
II. From Aid to Development Effectiveness
Commitments for Effective Development: South-South
Cooperation and Triangular Cooperation
Private Sector and Development
Combating Corruption and Illicit Flows
Climate Change Finance
Commitments for Effectiveness of Development Cooperation: Ownership, Results and
Accountability Transparent and
Responsible Cooperation Sustainable Development in
Situations of Conflict and Fragility
Strengthening Resilience and Reducing Vulnerability
9
II. From Aid to Development Effectiveness2. HLF-4, Busan (2011)Focus shifts from technical aid effectiveness towards new development effectiveness agenda
Development effectiveness is a progressively more ambitious agenda, more complex, and can create difficulties in operationalization and evaluation
Concerns about the unfinished business of Paris and AccraGlobal Partnership for Effective Development Cooperation as the New Framework is launched (June 2012)
10
III. New Global Partnership (June 2012- ) 1. Governance
(1) Ministerial MeetingReviews progress in implementing Busan commitmentsMeets every 18-24 months, alternating back-to-back with UNCDF (UN
Capital Development Fund) and OECD DAC High Level Meetings (2) Steering Committee
Steers the work of the ministerial meeting including strategic priorities and agenda
Acts as Ambassadors of Global Partnership to other international/regional processes
3 Co-Chairs and 15 Steering Committee Members 11
Ministerial Meeting
Steering Committee
Secretariat: OECD/ UNDP
Agenda & Priorities
Tasks & Assignments
Guidance
Support
Support
(3) Secretariat: OECD & UNDP UNDP will partner with OECD to support the new framework
UNDP newly joined the secretariat for the new framework Helps strengthen legitimacy of the HLF process and the new framework for universal rules and norms Division of labor:
OECD: Analytical expertise UNDP: Brings breadth based on international development work in the field
12
(4) Monitoring Indicators and Process Global Monitoring of the Busan Partnership
Participation of South-South providers in the monitoring framework is voluntary
10 Indicators: Efforts to reduce burden associated with collecting data Indicators on civil society, private sector, and gender equality newly introduced Indicators on civil society & private sector to be further discussed and detailed definitions and measurement issues to be finalized by late 2012 (Hong 2012)
Target Year: 2015
13
14
Paris Principle HLF-4 Shared Principles
HLF-4 Commitments for Effective DC
HLF-4 Commitments for Effective Development
HLF-4 Indicators for Monitoring
Ownership Ownership Ownership, Results and Accountability
South-South and Triangular Cooperation
Results
Alignment Focus on Results Transparent and Responsible Cooperation
Private Sector and Development
Civil Society
Harmonization Inclusive Development Partnerships
Sustainable Development in Conflict and Fragile Situations
Combating Corruption and Illicit Flows
Private Sector
Managing for Results
Transparency and Accountability
Resilience and Reducing Vulnerability
Climate Change Finance Transparency
Mutual Accountability
Predictability
Parliamentary Scrutiny
Mutual Accountability
Gender Equality
Effective Institutions - Using developing countries’ system
Aid Untying
Comparison of HLF Principles
III. New Global Partnership 2. Remaining Challenges (1) “Loose alliance” in order to encourage participation of emerging donors
“Differentiated commitments” to encourage South-South partners’ participation in the new framework
Reduce commitments to common principles as “voluntary” for South-South Cooperation of BRICS
(2) Need to ensure monitoring of implementation(3) Follow-up Process
Impact of the Busan Partnership depends on follow-upEnsure that monitoring indicators are applied to traditional
donors and gradually extended to other HLF-4 stakeholders (Oxfam 2012)
15
IV. South Korea’s Challenges as an Emerging Donor 1. Leadership in the Steering Committee
Further strengthen South-South partners’ political commitment Contributed to active participation of South-South partners in the Busan Partnership Bridging Role between traditional and emerging donors
Steering Committee South Korea is 1 of 3 representatives of Providers of Development CooperationCo-Chairs (Ministerial Level):
Ms. Armida Alisjahbana, Minister of State for National Development Planning, Indonesia Ms. Justine Greening, Secretary of State for International Development, U.K. Ms. Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala, Minister of Finance, Nigeria
Steering Committee Members (Senior Level): Representatives of Recipients (5), Recipient and Providers (1), Providers (3) of
Development Cooperation, Private Sector (1), Parliamentarians (1), Civil Society (1), Multilateral Development Banks(1) , UNDP/UNDG (1), and OECD/DAC (1)
16
Steering Committee Members
17
Recipients (5) Mr. Brahim Adoum Bachar, Secretary General, Ministry of Economy and Planning Chad
Mr. Luis Fernando Carrera Castro, Secretary for Planning and Programming, Presidency Guatemala
Mr. Iqbal Mahmood, Senior Secretary, Ministry of Finance Bangladesh
Ms. Noumea Simi, Assistant Chief Executive Officer, Ministry of Finance Samoa
Mr. Helder da Costa, Director of the International Secretariat of the G7+, Ministry of Finance
Timor-Leste
Recipients & Providers (1)
Mr. Luis Olivera, Executive Director, Peruvian Agency for International Cooperation (APCI) Peru
Providers (3) Mr. Gustavo Martin Prada, Director EC
Ms. Enna Park, Director General for Development Cooperation, Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade
South Korea
Mr. Donald Steinberg, Deputy Administrator, US Agency for International Development U.S.
Private Sector (1) John Sullivan, Center for International Private Enterprise
Parliamentarians (1) Mr. Martin Chungong, Director, Division of Programmes, Inter-Parliamentary Union
Civil Society (1) Ms. Mayra Moro-Coco, BetterAid
Multilateral Development Banks (1)
Ms. Sophie Sirtaine, Director, Corporate Reform and Strategy, Operations Policy and Country Services, World Bank
UNDP/UNDG(1) Ms. Sigrid Kaag, Assistant Secretary General and Assistant Administrator, Bureau for External Relations and Advocacy, UNDP
OECD/DAC (1) Mr. Brian Atwood, Chair, Development Assistance Committee, OECD
IV. South Korea’s Challenges as an Emerging Donor
2. Develop National Strategy for Global PartnershipReform policies and processes for development cooperationMore coherent and harmonized approach based on agreement by diverse actors
18
IV. South Korea’s Challenges as an Emerging Donor
3. Strengthen Political Support for ODA Strong political commitment of the new President (2013-)Reaffirmation of goals of South Korea’s ODA: Volume and Global leadershipContinued improvement of the Aid System Increase participation and involvement of CSOsHuman resource building at home: Education and training of development cooperation experts
19
20