Upload
ronia
View
50
Download
3
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
EU TRANSPORT POLICY - NEW DEVELOPMENTS. Tamás Fleischer Institute for World Economics of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences http://www.vki.hu/~tfleisch . Working Group „EU-Relations” Alps Adriatic Working Community 12th Meeting, Pécs, Europe House 28th April, 2005. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
EU TRANSPORT POLICY - NEW DEVELOPMENTS
Tamás FleischerInstitute for World Economics
of the Hungarian Academy of Scienceshttp://www.vki.hu/~tfleisch
Working Group „EU-Relations”Alps Adriatic Working Community12th Meeting, Pécs, Europe House
28th April, 2005
2
Transport Policy of the European Union –comments from a new member state
3
Hungarian Transport Policy 2003-2015
Transport Policy of the European Union –comments from a new member state
4
Hungarian Transport Policy 2003-2015
1990
2004
Transport Policy of the European Union –comments from a new member state
5
Hungarian Transport Policy 2003-2015
„Time to decide” 2001
1990
2004
Transport Policy of the European Union –comments from a new member state
6
„White Paper” 1992
Hungarian Transport Policy 2003-2015
„Time to decide” 2001
1990
2004
7
„White Paper” 1992
Hungarian Transport Policy 2003-2015
Hungarian Transport Policy 1996
„Time to decide” 2001
1990
2004
8
„White Paper” 1992
Trans-European Networks
Hungarian Transport Policy 2003-2015
Hungarian Transport Policy 1996
„Time to decide” 2001
1990
2004
9
„White Paper” 1992
Trans-European Networks
Hungarian Transport Policy 2003-2015
Hungarian Transport Policy 1996
„Time to decide” 2001
Pan-European Corridors, TINA
1990
2004
10
„White Paper” 1992
Trans-European Networks
Hungarian Transport Policy 2003-2015
Hungarian Transport Policy 1996
„Time to decide” 2001
Pan-European Corridors, TINA
A TEN revision 2004 (29 April)
1990
2004
11
Before 1992– There was no integrated transport policy in the union,
single sectorial targets main motivation was the regulation of the competition
EU CTP 1992 „Single network to the single market”– Integrated transport policy – but focus on one single layer
(international level)– Inter-modality, interoperability =>, free access, corridors,
TEN-T, single market Comparing the characteristics of western and eastern
European transport transport performance / unite of GDP, accidents, modal split (rail/road ratio) EU-25év CEE+15 év
Common Transport Policy (CTP) of the European Union 1992
12
Illustration of the necessity of interoperability: differences in voltage and electricity systems of railways of Europe
Common Transport Policy (CTP) of the European Union 1992
13Source: Az országos közúthálózat 1991-2000 évekre szóló-fejlesztési programja 1991, KHVM.
The birth of corridor thinking, renumbering the roads in 1975
TEN and its extension to the east
14
TEN and its extension to the east
What does the eastern extension of the TEN means ?
15 Extension of the grid toward the east
TEN and its extension to the east
16 Prolongation of the east-west corridors
TEN and its extension to the east
17
TEN and its extension to the east
Prolongation of the east-west corridors
18
TEN and its extension to the east
Prolongation of the east-west corridors
19
TEN and its extension to the east
Prolongation of the east-west corridors
20
Source: http://www.khvm.hu/EU-integracio/A_magyarorszagi_TINA_halozat/Image11.gif
Helsinki, or Pan-European transport corridors
TEN and its extension to the east
21
Dilemmas of the Central European Transport Policy in time of EU Enlargement
(1) Corridors (TEN) in western Europe were based on the internal demand of the area, namely on the necessity of the interconnection of well developed national networks (“Common network to the common market”)
(2) In the eastern part of Europe the starting point was external: the extension of the TEN network toward the east. Its priority is exaggerated in countries where internal connections also would need enforcement
(3) Furthermore, in Hungary interregional corridors are planned in a mistaken structure, strengthening the earlier single-centred hierarchy
22
Forrás: Útgazdálkodás 1994-1998. KHVM, Közúti Főos ztály
Hungary plans to lead the transit traffic through its most heavily loaded areas that would need rather protection
TEN and its extension to the east
23
24
EU Transport Policy 2001: „Time to Decide”
25
Main problems to solve: congestion, isolated regions, quality problems, deteriorated environment, accidents
Balance of the consequences of the 1992 CTP Main target: decoupling the link between the economic
and the transport growth - focus on road transport through charging, - with efficiency measures in other modes,- targeted investments… …into the TEN networks…
Sixty measures – in four blocks. - shift the balance between modes of transport, - eliminate bottlenecks, - place users at the heart of transport policy, - manage the globalisation of transport.
EU Transport Policy 2001: „Time to Decide”
26
EU Transport Policy 2001: „Time to Decide”
27
Summary
A transport policy collects the governmental strategies promoting the operation and development of activities belonging to the transport sector.
The basic documents of the transport policy of the past decade are the White Papers (CTP) of the European Union in 1992 and in 2001 (Time to Decide); while in Hungary the national Transport Policy of 1996 and 2004.
The documents of the EU earlier focused mainly on the overlay level of the networks between the single countries. Copying the unchanged priority of the construction of the corridors in domestic transport policies can be considered as a mistake.
Besides exaggerated priority of inter-regional axes, the Hungarian planners lead the through traffic across the conurbation of Budapest, in a single-centred structure, and built on that structure also the network of the logistic centres.
EU TRANSPORT POLICY - NEW DEVELOPMENTSTamás FleischerInstitute for World Economicsof the Hungarian Academy of Scienceshttp://www.vki.hu/~tfleisch<[email protected]>
Working Group „EU-Relations”Alps Adriatic Working Community12th Meeting, Pécs, Europe House28th April, 2005
THANKS FOR THE ATTENTION