ethics oped

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/6/2019 ethics oped

    1/2

    No one is perfect. The devil is in the details. No good deed goes unpunished Every

    saying a clich and every saying accurately describes Bernalillo Countys Ethics

    Ordinance. The ordinance was I believe an honest attempt to protect the public

    from both the perception and reality of misbehavior by county employees and

    elected officials. It created a set of standards and a process for enforcing those

    standards.

    Allegations against any county employee or elected official can be made through a

    sworn complaint or anonymously. A web portal was set up to collect anonymous

    complaints and not surprisingly the countys web portal quickly became the favorite

    way to file a complaint.

    No one is perfect In order to protect employees and officials from frivolous

    complaints, anonymous complaints are reviewed by an independent investigator to

    determine the validity of the allegation and the applicability of the ordinance.

    Should facts supporting a violation be found, the ordinance requires that the

    Internal Audit Contractor prepare the sworn complaint and present its investigationto the Ethics Board.

    The ordinance clearly intends that a full board of five members be present to hear

    complaints even providing for a replacement appointee where a member has a

    conflict of interest.

    To date, there have been three cases where the Internal Audit Contractor found

    facts that support a violation of the countys Ethics Ordinance. Would it surprise you

    that one of the complaints has been dismissed despite the fact that the full Ethics

    Board hasnt heard a case in well over a decade? It certainly surprised me. In fact, I

    was shocked!

    The devil is in the details A constituent of mine recently quipped is it any surprise

    that they found a way around the ordinance when the ordinance itself was taken

    from Cook County Illinois? In point of fact, the shortcut to dismissal wasnt found in

    Chicago, but right here in the City of Albuquerque.

    At the last full meeting of the Ethics Board in October of 2010, the County Attorney

    presented the board with a set of Rules and Regulations that included language

    from the City of Albuquerque Ethics Board creating a review committee of three

    members. The review committee made up of Ethics Board members appointed

    by the Ethics Board Chair - has the authority to summarily dismiss complaints insecret prior to a public hearing. Thats how a case that was never heard by the

    Ethics Board and never heard by the public was dismissed.

    At the time the dismissed case was reviewed by the review committee, there

    were two members of the Ethics Board still waiting to be confirmed and one of the

    three review committee members was an appointee of the accused. County

    Attorney Jeff Landers in a memo dated January 18, 2011, encouraged the three

  • 8/6/2019 ethics oped

    2/2

    remaining members to review the case in spite of the fact that the board was

    missing two members. Worse, he seemingly encouraged dismissal stating [a]s you

    are aware, the review committee is able to review the Complaint and determine

    whether it believes that the matter should be dismissed without hearing. How can

    the public trust a ruling from a committee where one of three members was

    appointed by the accused, the decision was made in secret, and the CountyAttorney appears to be encouraging dismissal without a public hearing?

    The ethics ordinance created a two step process where an independent investigator

    reviews a case to determine its merits, then presents the case to the full Ethics

    Board. It does not include a review committee, and does not permit hearings by

    less than the full board. The review committee process is a disservice to and

    perhaps even a deception of the public. Not to mention the pall it casts over the

    accused who is denied the opportunity of a public exoneration.

    No good deed goes unpunished The three complaints found to have merit

    including the dismissed complaint, have all been against Commission Chair andEthics Ordinance champion Maggie Hart Stebbins. Its the irony of ethics ordinances

    that they can be used unethically and perhaps that is the case here. However, we

    will never know for sure in at least one case because that case has been dismissed

    in secret by a review committee.

    The people of Bernalillo County deserve open, transparent, and ethical government.

    There can be no shortcuts to dismissal and no short circuiting of the original process

    created by the Commission. Valid complaints need to be heard in public not

    dismissed behind closed doors. Its our responsibility as elected officials to restore

    and maintain the trust in county government. Obviously, we still have a long way to

    go.

    Wayne Johnson

    Bernalillo County Commissioner District 5

    (505) 238-9352

    [email protected]