Upload
ched-macquigg
View
218
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/6/2019 ethics oped
1/2
No one is perfect. The devil is in the details. No good deed goes unpunished Every
saying a clich and every saying accurately describes Bernalillo Countys Ethics
Ordinance. The ordinance was I believe an honest attempt to protect the public
from both the perception and reality of misbehavior by county employees and
elected officials. It created a set of standards and a process for enforcing those
standards.
Allegations against any county employee or elected official can be made through a
sworn complaint or anonymously. A web portal was set up to collect anonymous
complaints and not surprisingly the countys web portal quickly became the favorite
way to file a complaint.
No one is perfect In order to protect employees and officials from frivolous
complaints, anonymous complaints are reviewed by an independent investigator to
determine the validity of the allegation and the applicability of the ordinance.
Should facts supporting a violation be found, the ordinance requires that the
Internal Audit Contractor prepare the sworn complaint and present its investigationto the Ethics Board.
The ordinance clearly intends that a full board of five members be present to hear
complaints even providing for a replacement appointee where a member has a
conflict of interest.
To date, there have been three cases where the Internal Audit Contractor found
facts that support a violation of the countys Ethics Ordinance. Would it surprise you
that one of the complaints has been dismissed despite the fact that the full Ethics
Board hasnt heard a case in well over a decade? It certainly surprised me. In fact, I
was shocked!
The devil is in the details A constituent of mine recently quipped is it any surprise
that they found a way around the ordinance when the ordinance itself was taken
from Cook County Illinois? In point of fact, the shortcut to dismissal wasnt found in
Chicago, but right here in the City of Albuquerque.
At the last full meeting of the Ethics Board in October of 2010, the County Attorney
presented the board with a set of Rules and Regulations that included language
from the City of Albuquerque Ethics Board creating a review committee of three
members. The review committee made up of Ethics Board members appointed
by the Ethics Board Chair - has the authority to summarily dismiss complaints insecret prior to a public hearing. Thats how a case that was never heard by the
Ethics Board and never heard by the public was dismissed.
At the time the dismissed case was reviewed by the review committee, there
were two members of the Ethics Board still waiting to be confirmed and one of the
three review committee members was an appointee of the accused. County
Attorney Jeff Landers in a memo dated January 18, 2011, encouraged the three
8/6/2019 ethics oped
2/2
remaining members to review the case in spite of the fact that the board was
missing two members. Worse, he seemingly encouraged dismissal stating [a]s you
are aware, the review committee is able to review the Complaint and determine
whether it believes that the matter should be dismissed without hearing. How can
the public trust a ruling from a committee where one of three members was
appointed by the accused, the decision was made in secret, and the CountyAttorney appears to be encouraging dismissal without a public hearing?
The ethics ordinance created a two step process where an independent investigator
reviews a case to determine its merits, then presents the case to the full Ethics
Board. It does not include a review committee, and does not permit hearings by
less than the full board. The review committee process is a disservice to and
perhaps even a deception of the public. Not to mention the pall it casts over the
accused who is denied the opportunity of a public exoneration.
No good deed goes unpunished The three complaints found to have merit
including the dismissed complaint, have all been against Commission Chair andEthics Ordinance champion Maggie Hart Stebbins. Its the irony of ethics ordinances
that they can be used unethically and perhaps that is the case here. However, we
will never know for sure in at least one case because that case has been dismissed
in secret by a review committee.
The people of Bernalillo County deserve open, transparent, and ethical government.
There can be no shortcuts to dismissal and no short circuiting of the original process
created by the Commission. Valid complaints need to be heard in public not
dismissed behind closed doors. Its our responsibility as elected officials to restore
and maintain the trust in county government. Obviously, we still have a long way to
go.
Wayne Johnson
Bernalillo County Commissioner District 5
(505) 238-9352