Upload
winter
View
32
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Ethics and Values. in Public Policy. How Should We Decide?. Utilitarianism, deontology, casuistry Market, politics, authority. Making Public Policy. How should we decide how to decide what our policies should be? We can let people choose for themselves (markets) - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Ethics and Values
in Public Policy
Mark Carl Rom
How Should We Decide? Utilitarianism, deontology, casuistry Market, politics, authority
Mark Carl Rom
Making Public Policy How should we decide how to decide what
our policies should be?We can let people choose for themselves
(markets)We can have the public choose for everyone
(democracy)We can have leaders decide for everyone
(authority)
Mark Carl Rom
Which is Better? When should we use
Markets?Democracy?Authority?
All have advantages/disadvantages No one form dominates the others
Mark Carl Rom
Steps in Policy Choice Step 1: Is there a problem? What is it?
Step 1A: If “No”• No explicit policy• Citizens may choose whatever actions they like,
subject to existing policies• Example: Marriage? Child bearing? Child rearing?
Step 1B: If “Yes”, then go to Step 2
Mark Carl Rom
Steps in Policy Choice Step 2: Should we decide collectively or
individually?Policy choice: This is a individual decision
problem; go to Step 1A (leave it to individual choice)
Policy choice: This is a collective decision problem; go to Step 3
Mark Carl Rom
Steps in Policy Choice Step 3: How should we choose the policy?
Step 3A: Policy selected through democratic choice (voting).
Step 3B: Policy delegated to authorities (who might be experts).
Mark Carl Rom
Types of Decisions Two main questions:
Does the outcome of the decision affect only my welfare, or the welfare of others?• Private outcomes: my welfare only• Public outcomes: others’ welfare
Is the decision made me alone, or by the group as a whole?• Individual decisions: made individually• Collective decisions: made by the group
Mark Carl Rom
Types of Policy Decisions Individual
DecisionCollective Decision
Private Outcome Liberty of the individual! Consequence: individual satisfaction.
Leave it to the market!
Tyranny of the majority:Consequence: theft of rights!
Politics may hurt the public!
Public Outcome Tyranny of the minority:Consequence: Few positive externalities; many negative ones.
The market may hurt the public!
Liberty of the group!Consequence: social welfare.
Leave it to the politics!
Mark Carl Rom
Collective Decisions What kind of issues should trigger
collective decisions? What kind of issues should trigger
individual decisions? Hard cases…
What decisions truly only affect the individuals who make them?
What decisions truly affect the public?
Mark Carl Rom
Private-Public Decisions What actions should trigger collective
decisions? If individual decisions cause:Material harmsElevated risk of harmAmenity harmsEmotional or psychological harmsSpiritual or moral harms
Mark Carl Rom
Public-Private Decisions What actions should trigger collective
decisions? If individual decisions cause: Structural harms (damage to organizations or
communities)Accumulative harms (actions that damage
only if enough people do them)Harms to a community or society if individuals
fail to take action So….what actions do NOT affect others?
Mark Carl Rom
The Three Conflicts
Markets
Experts Politics
EfficiencyEquity
Institutional Reform
Mark Carl Rom
How do experts decide? Professional training: Typically focuses on
Efficiency (economists) Equity (political scientists) Rights (lawyers)
“Expert failure” Cognitive limits Cognitive impairments Uncertainty Value conflicts Preferences Power
Mark Carl Rom
How do politics decide? Goal: To learn the “Will of the People” Process: Voting
Plurality Majority Unanimity Proportional representation Borda counting Approval counting Optimal majority rule
Different procedures will lead to different outcomes
Mark Carl Rom
Criteria for “Good” Voting Systems http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
Voting_system But…no voting rule satisfies all criteria!
Mark Carl Rom
Who Should Win?
BetterA
C
B
8
B
C
A
7
C
B
A
6
Number of Voters in Group
Mark Carl Rom
Policy: The Federalism ‘Game’
Mark Carl Rom
How do Markets Decide? Markets: a set of institutions for reducing
transaction costs in exchange of goods and services
Preconditions: diverse preferences, diverse endowments, economies of scale, specialization
Benefits: gains from trade, gains in productive efficiency, prices convey information
Mark Carl Rom
Markets are efficient Under perfect competition (PC)
Perfect and free informationPrice takingPrivate decisionsPrivate goods
Market failures: when PC does not exist, experts MAY improve efficiency
Mark Carl Rom
Market Failure Three main types of market failures
1. Markets fail if governments remove, or fail to create, the ´infrastructure´ of market processes• Property rights, legal system
2. Markets fail if governments create, or fail to remove, impediments to market processes• Taxes, subsidies
3. Markets fail to perform efficiently because of inherent violations of the goal of Pareto optimality• Informational asymmetries, externalities, economies of scale
Mark Carl Rom
Markets v. Politics The contest between efficiency and equity
There is (no) agreement about what is efficient meansThere is no agreement about what is equitable
• Equal shares (Rawls)• Equal needs (Marx)• Equal contributions (Smith)
Equity and efficiency: conflict or compatibleTradeoffs?More of both?
Mark Carl Rom
Politics vs. Markets Do markets or politics best ensures
legitimate rewards to individual effort, consistent with preserving rights of others?Markets handle allocation efficientlyPolitics in a democracy will be redirected
towards redistributionExperts do not agree about what to do
Mark Carl Rom
Experts v. Politics Preferences x Institutions = Outcomes
If preferences change, and institutions remain constant, outcomes will change
If institutions change, and preferences remain constant, outcomes will change
Political actors focus on outcomes, and seek to manipulate either preferences or institutions
Experts do not agree what outcomes, or institutions, are preferable
Mark Carl Rom
Tensions Markets and Politics
Equity Policies• Income (re)distribution• Resource allocation• Externality control
Theory: Individual vs. collective decisions. Practice: Who actually has power in markets
and politics?
Mark Carl Rom
Tensions Markets and Experts
Efficiency Policies• Market structure• Externality control• Public goods• Information asymmetry
Theory: Potential for enhancing efficiency Practice: What are real motives and insights of
both?
Mark Carl Rom
Tensions Politics and Experts
Institutional Reform Policies• Institutional design• Values (equity and efficiency)• Information
Theory: Both work for “public interest” Practice: Politicians reluctant, experts
ignorant
Mark Carl Rom
How Should We Decide? Utilitarianism, deontology, casuistry Market, politics, experts