28
FHWA Report Mark R. Kehrli, Director, FHWA Office of Transportation Operations SCOTE Meeting June 26, 2017

Estimated Time Line for 2017 Edition - Transportation.org · Traffic Control Devices –MUTCD. ... WI MI IL AR MS AL SC NY MO LA IN OH FL GA TN KY ME VT NH MA RI CT 2 NJ DE ... -

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

FHWA Report

Mark R. Kehrli, Director, FHWA Office of Transportation Operations

SCOTE Meeting – June 26, 2017

MUTCD Initiatives

Traffic Incident Management Progress

Road Weather Management Goals

Work Zone Management

Operations Program Priorities

Office of Transportation Operations Programs

Performance Management Rulemaking

Connected Automated Vehicles (covered during afternoon session)

Freight – FAST Act and Other Activities

Other Office of Operations Programs

Office of Transportation Operations

MUTCD

Kevin Sylvester

Work Zones &

Road Weather

Paul Pisano

Traffic Incident &

Emergency Management

Kim Vasconez

Program Team Leaders

Office Structure

Next Edition of the MUTCD

Current Status

Pavement Marking Retro Rulemaking

Supplemental NPA docket closed May 4

Docket comments being analyzed (around 40 comments)

MUTCD

New Administration is identifying priorities

Still pursuing new Interim Approvals

4

Traffic Control Devices – MUTCD

Interim Approvals & Other Activities

FHWA continues to pursue new IAs that have

potential to address demonstrated needs

Bicycle Boxes (IA-18)

Alt. Signal Warrant 7—Crash Experience (IA-19)

2-Stage Bicycle Turn Box (IA-20 – NEW)

Policy Statements and Interpretations can also

address needs on an interim basis

Permanent Signing for Traffic Incidents (Official

Interp.)

CMS Policy Update (in progress)

5

Traffic Control Devices – MUTCD

Interim Approvals

RRFB (IA-11)

Numerous patent claims

Complex legal issues

Expect resolution very soon

Clearview (IA-5, Terminated)

Analyzing 24 submissions to Dec. 2016 RFI:

9 State DOTs 3 Organizations

2 Local agencies 8 Citizens

2 Toll agencies

3 new research reports being analyzed

SIGN Act6

Traffic Control Devices – MUTCD

National TIM Responder Training

Program Implementation Progress -

National TIM Responder Training

Program Implementation ProgressAs of June 12, 2017

Traffic Incident Management (TIM)

Train-the-Trainer Sessions• 313 sessions with 9,660 participants

• 23% of participants have provided training

In-Person Responder Training• 10,213 sessions with 234,814 participants

Web-Based Training (WBT) • 22,595 total | 17,408 NHI | 1,610 Other

• 3,577 ERSI Responder Safety Learning Network

Total Trained: 267,069

TIM Training Program Implementation Progress

Train-the-Trainer (TtT) SessionsAs of June 12, 2017

Traffic Incident Management (TIM)

313 TtT Sessions Conducted

WA

OR

CA

NV

ID

UT

NMAZ

ND

MN

IANE

MT

WY

COKS

OK

TX

WIMI

IL

AR

MSAL

SC

NY

MO

LA

IN

OH

FL

GA

TN

KY

MEVT

NH

MA

RICT

NJ2

DE

MDWVVA

DC

2

PA

2

3

2

2

SD

3

211

9

3

2

3

2

2

2

FHWA Sponsored

TtT Session Conducted

State/Local Led/Funded

TtT Session Conducted

TtT Session Planned

2

AK

HIPR

2

2

2

2

FHWA and State/Local

Co-Sponsored

TtT Session Conducted

3

2

2

2

2

NC

2

2

5

22

2

3

TIM Training Program Implementation Progress

Total Trained- As of May 31, 2015

TIM Training Program Implementation Progress

Total Trainers TrainedAs of June 12, 2017

Traffic Incident Management (TIM)

9,660 Trainers Trained

MA: 149

186

RI: 43

CT: 70

NJ: 247

DE: 32MD:

225

DC: 81

67

162

258

73

142

165

223117197

424

231

75

246

141

162171

532

334

61

68

140

59

460

81

122

184

304

41

203

269

188154

509

176

263

73

214357

VT: 43

NH: 53

56

39164

Canada:

8

TIM Training Program Implementation Progress

Total Trained- As of May 31, 2015

TIM Training Program Implementation Progress

Responder Training: In-Person and Web-BasedAs of June 12, 2017

Traffic Incident Management (TIM)

MA: 2,853[76]

1,351[1,085]

RI: 1,427[13]

CT: 772[227]

NJ: 8,286[136]

MD: 4,647[211]

DC: 1,992[35]

3,067[17]

1,006[213]

3,688[166]

1,134[24]

434[62]

7,314[418]11,717

[1,845]4,888[78]10,720

[267]

5,244[356]

4,619 [387]

227[30]

2,369[46]

7,313[19]

5,119[98]

8,079[62]

13,997[8,293]

8,198[342]

2,606[37]

2,603[31]

1,923[10]

1,071[7]

14,143[4,162]

357[93]

4,149[74]

3,494[115]

4,649[104]

1,399[30]

3,001[619]

10,608 [138]

5,463[90]3,158

[47]

2,978[74]

4,387[250]

875[29]

18,086[418]

VT: 1,265[30]

NH: 1,770[18]

352[63]

Mexico: 537

Number of Responders Trained: In-Person - 234,814 Web-Based - [22,595]

227[395] 3,421

[9]

DE: 319[58]

5,971[550]

Canada:

343 [47]

TIM Training Program Implementation Progress

Total Trained- As of May 31, 2015

TIM Training Program Implementation Progress

Total TrainedAs of June 12, 2017

Traffic Incident Management (TIM)

3,594

MA: 3,078

2,622

RI: 1,483

CT: 1,069

NJ: 8,669

MD: 5,083

DC: 2,108

3,151

1,381

4,112

1,231

638

7,897

13,7855,08311,184

6,024

5,237

332

2,661

7,473

5,3798,312

22,822

8,874

2,704

2,702

2,073

1,137

18,765

531

4,345

3,793

5,057

1,470

3,823

11,015

5,7413,359

10,439

3,228

4,900

977

6,73518,861

471 Mexico: 537

DE: 409

267,069 Total Trained

661

VT: 1,338

NH: 1,841

Canada:

398

TIM Training Program Implementation Progress

Total Responders to Be Trained- As of May 31, 2015

Total Percent TrainedSIP17 Goal: 20% as of June 12, 2017

Traffic Incident Management (TIM)

22.7% Percent Trained

(1,178,022) Total Responders To Be Trained

MA: 25.5%(12,079)

12.6%(20,777)

RI: 36.3%(4,080)

CT: 34.3%(3,120)

NJ: 29.1%(29,798)

MD: 21.9% (23,218)

DC: 32.3%(6,534)

30.0%(10,502)

36.1%

(11,394)

32.7%(3,770)

6.0%(10,627)

14.5%(54,500)37.1%

(37,126)16.6%(30,546)

20.4%(54,699)

45.5%(13,245)

26.3%(19,894)

3.3%(9,932)

43.7%(17,100)

16.5%(32,555)

30.7%(27,081)

29.1%(78,309)

28.6%(31,000)

42.0%(4,930)

28.5%(3,993)

26.3%(71,223)

4.5%(11,781)

16.5%(26,350)

42.1%(9,019)

22.5%(22,500)

18.8%(7,831)

26.7%(14,331)

19.8%(55,670)

20.1%(28,532)

38.7%(8,683)

31.7%

9.0%(54,443)

13.0%(7,510)

37.1%(18,177)

VT: 47.9%(2,796)

NH: 25.7%(7,175)

9.8%(4,797)

20.2%(3,270) 60.7%

(5,924)

10 - 19.9% Trained

5 - 9.9% Trained

0.1 - 4.9% Trained

32.1%(8,300)

(32,948)

3.1%(45,209)

9.0%(30,208)

12.5%(21,542)

DE: 8.7%(4,715)

20 - 29.9% Trained

30 - 39.9% Trained

40+% Trained

TIM Training Program Implementation Progress

Total To Be Trained By Discipline - As of May 31, 2015

Traffic Incident Management (TIM)

* NHI Web-Based Training totals are included in “Other Disciplines”

TIM Training Program Implementation Progress

Total To Be Trained By DisciplineAs of June 12, 2017

27,224 (61.0%)

22,000 (28.9%)

29,031 (34.3%)

12,654 (5.8%)

99,333 (26.5%)

76,827 (20.2%)

44,597

76,041

84,686

217,115

374,527

381,056

0 50,000 100,000 150,000 200,000 250,000 300,000 350,000 400,000 450,000

Other Disciplines

Towing and Recovery

Transportation/Public Works

EMS

Fire/Rescue

Law Enforcement

Total Trained Total To Be Trained

• Pathfinder

• Strengthen the working relationships across

State DOTs and the Weather Enterprise for the

dissemination of road weather information to

travelers that is clear, concise, impact-based,

and consistent

• Integrating Mobile Observations (IMO)

• Deploy advanced, vehicle-based technologies to

collect, transmit, and use weather, road

condition, and related vehicle data for improved

transportation system management

14

EDC-4: Weather-Savvy Roads

Road Weather

• Monday, August 21, 2017

• Approximately 200 million people live within a day’s

drive of the path of this total eclipse

• Some actions that State DOTs are taking:

• Suspending road work that day

• Coordinating traveler information messages with law

enforcement and others

• Monitoring related events (http://nationaleclipse.com)

• AASHTO task force

15

2017 Solar Eclipse

Source: FHWA

Road Weather

EDC-3: Smarter Work Zones

Successfully promoted the deployment of two

innovative strategies designed to optimize work

zone safety and mobility

Project Coordination 34 States implemented strategies to better coordinate

projects that minimize disruptions to safety and

mobility

Technology Application 41 States implemented a variety of ITS technology

solutions keep traffic moving safely through work

zones

Work Zones

EDC-3: Smarter Work Zones

Promoting the deployment of two innovative

strategies designed to optimize work zone

safety and mobility

Project CoordinationStrategies:

WISE tool:

Technology Application1a: Planning:

1b: Demonstrating:

Work Zones

Target: 25 (by 12/31/2016) Number of States Implementing: 34 Goal Met? Exceeded by 9

Target: 35

(by 12/31/2016)

Number of States Implementing 1a: 9

Number of States Implementing 1b: 32

Goal Met? Exceeded by 6

Target: 5 (by 12/31/2016) Number of States Implementing: 4 Goal Met? No

EDC-3: Smarter Work Zones

SWZ Interactive

ToolkitResources:• 13 Webinars

• 3 Fact Sheets

• 6 Case Studies

• 14 Marketing Products

• Specifications and other

project related info

• Peer Exchanges and

Workshops

• Training

• Demonstration Site Visits

• Other references

Work Zones

https://www.workzonesafety.org/swz/

Advanced Transportation and Congestion

Management Technologies Deployment (ATCMTD)

FAST Act Competitive grants for development of model deployment

sites for large-scale installation and operation

ATCMTD program

61 applications in response to NOFO

Requesting $354M of Federal funding for over $1B of total

project costs

Technical Review Teams currently reviewing

applications

ATCMTD

Transportation Performance Management

FHWA TPM Rulemaking: Status

TPM Related Rules Final Rule Published Rule Effective Date

Safety Performance Measures March 15, 2016 April 14, 2016

Highway Safety Improvement

ProgramMarch 15, 2016 April 14, 2016

Statewide and Non-Metropolitan

Planning; Metropolitan PlanningMay 27, 2016 June 27, 2016

Highway Asset Management Plans

for NHSOctober 24, 2016 October 2, 2017

Pavement and Bridge Condition

MeasuresJanuary 18, 2017 May 20, 2017

Performance of the NHS, Freight,

and CMAQ MeasuresJanuary 18, 2017 May 20, 2017*

* Except for portions of the rule related to the percent change in CO2 emissions from 2017

(GHG measure). Those portions are delayed and FHWA will be publishing an NPRM in the

Federal Register pertaining to this measure.

Transportation Performance Management

GHG Measure Delayed

While the rule took effect on May 20, 2017, certain

portions of the rule pertaining to the GHG measure (the

percent change in CO2 emissions from 2017, generated

by on-road mobile sources on the NHS) have been

delayed indefinitely.

FHWA will be publishing a NPRM in the Federal Register

pertaining to the GHG measure.

Transportation Performance Management

Final Measures: System Performance and Freight

Note: These measures contribute to assessing the National Highway Performance Program

(NHPP) and National Highway Freight Program (NHFP)

Measure Area Performance Measures

Performance of the National Highway System(Subpart E)

• Interstate Travel Time Reliability Measure: Percent of person-miles traveled on the Interstate that are reliable

• Non-Interstate Travel Time Reliability Measure: Percent of person-miles traveled on the non-Interstate NHS that are reliable

Freight Movement on the Interstate System (Subpart F)

• Freight Reliability Measure: Truck Travel Time Reliability (TTTR) Index

Transportation Performance Management

Measure Area Performance Measures

Measures to Assess the CMAQ Program – Traffic Congestion(Subpart G)

• Peak Hour Excessive Delay(PHED) Measure: Annual

Hours of Peak Hour Excessive Delay (PHED) Per

Capita

• Non-Single Occupancy Vehicle Travel (SOV)

Measure: Percent of Non-Single Occupancy

Vehicle (SOV) Travel

Measure to Assess the CMAQ Program – On-Road Mobile Source Emissions (Subpart H)

• Emissions Measure: Total Emissions Reduction

Final Measures: CMAQ Program

FAST Act Implementation Nationally Significant Freight and Highway program provides financial

assistance—competitive grants or credit assistance—to nationally and

regionally significant freight and highway projects that align with the

program goals

The program is funded at $4.5 billion in total over 5 years

FY16 awards for 18 grants totaling nearly $770 million, will be combined

with other funding from federal, state, local, and private sources to

support $3.6 billion in infrastructure investment in 15 states and the

District of Columbia

National Highway Freight Program provides funding for freight projects on

the National Highway Freight Network.

The program provides $6.3 billion in formula funds over five years for

States

Program funding – guidance issued

Freight

FAST Act Implementation Changes to Truck Size and Weight provisions - guidance issued

Critical Urban and Rural Freight Corridor designation process –

guidance issued.

State Freight Plans and State Freight Advisory Committees –

guidance issued November 2016; reviewing Plans for compliance

US DOT working on designation of the National Multimodal

Freight Network

National Strategic Freight Plan –US DOT is working on

completing a final Plan this year

Emergency Route Working Group to determine best practices for

expeditious State approval of special permits for vehicles involved in

emergency response and recovery

Freight

FAST Act Implementation The Fixing America's Surface Transportation Act (FAST Act)

directed the FHWA Administrator to establish a National Highway

Freight Network (NHFN) to strategically direct Federal resources

and policies toward improved performance of highway portions of

the U.S. freight transportation system. The NHFN includes the

following subsystems of roadways:

Primary Highway Freight System (PHFS)

Other Interstate portions not on the PHFS

Critical Rural Freight Corridors (CRFCs)

Critical Urban Freight Corridors (CUFCs)

FHWA working with States and Metropolitan Planning Organizations

on the certification of Critical Urban/Critical Rural Freight

Corridors.

Freight

Other Activities/Assistance Develop and maintain Freight Analysis Framework

Oversee truck size and weight regulatory requirements and

manage truck size and weight research activities

Lead National Truck Parking Coalition and Jason’s Law Survey

Provide freight professional development capacity building

Peer to Peer Program

Talking Freight

Training and Best Practices

Other Research

Freight Fluidity

FRATIS

Border Initiatives

U.S./European Union Urban Goods Movement Twinning Initiative

Freight

Thank You!